British Journal of General Practice, November 2013 611
1. nasal blockage/obstruction/congestion in patients with ARS found that 15 patients 2. or discoloured nasal discharge would need to be treated with antibiotics before a benefit would be seen in a single 3. or cough (day and night time) case.6 The number needed to treat (NNT) was lower at 8 for those with a finding This diagnosis is open and makes of purulent discharge in the pharynx. differentiation from the common cold The review could not find a justification difficult. for the use of antibiotics in ARS, even in A common cold (acute viral rhinosinusitis) those patients with symptoms for more has duration of symptoms of <10 days. than 7–10 days. This highlights a pitfall in Acute post-viral rhinosinusitis is seen identifying patients with a bacterial cause when symptoms worsen after 5 days or who would benefit from antibiotics. It is symptoms are persistent beyond 10 days difficult to directly compare studies where but <12 weeks duration. Finally, acute there is no consistent choice or dose of bacterial rhinosinusitis (ABRS) would be antibiotic. A Cochrane Review found only a indicated by the presence of at least 3 of: small benefit in patients treated for ARS with symptoms longer than 7 days in primary 1. discoloured discharge (unilateral care but 80% of patients not treated recover predominance); within 2 weeks anyway.7 A Dutch study 2. severe local pain (unilateral reported an incidence of complications predominance); of 3 per million per population annually 3. fever, that is, >38°C; and the prescribing of antibiotics does not appear to reduce the rate of complications 4. elevated inflammatory markers (CRP); from ARS.8 A Cochrane Review did not find and any deleterious results in patients with 5. ‘double sickening’ whereby the patient’s upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) in condition deteriorates. whom antimicrobial therapy was delayed.9 Therefore, patients should not be The majority of patients presenting with prescribed antibiotics routinely or a delayed symptoms of ARS will have a common cold. antibiotic prescribing strategy could be This is followed by post-viral rhinosinusitis employed. Antibiotics should be reserved and only a very small proportion of patients for patients who are systemically unwell; will have ABRS and therefore will be symptoms are persistent beyond 10 days, amenable to management with antibiotics. a worsening of symptoms after 5 days, or There is no role for imaging for suspected in those with severe symptoms after this ARS in primary care.3 time period (clinically, severe local pain, fever, discoloured discharge, or double COMPLICATIONS OF ACUTE sickening).3 If antibiotics are prescribed RHINOSINUSITIS after weighing up the risks and benefits, Although relatively rare, the sequelae amoxicillin, doxycycline, or clarithromycin of complications can be devastating. for 7 days can be considered, with Complications can be divided into co-amoxiclav as a backup if no improvement intracranial, bony (osseous), and orbital is seen within the first 48 hours. with the latter being most common. If patients require antibiotics and still Orbital complications range from show no signs of improvement, then preseptal cellulitis to orbital abscess and referral to ENT is required. cavernous sinus thrombosis. Intracranial complications usually result in encephalitis Steroids Box 1. Red flag signs in ARS or abscess. Osteomyelitis can result from Intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) form the warranting urgent referral to infection of the bone. Finally, an episode of mainstay of treatment in rhinosinusitis. ENT ARS can become chronic if no resolution Meltzer et al conducted a large trial of 981 Red flags occurs. patients.10 They found INCS as monotherapy • Frontal swelling in ARS provided a significant improvement • Severe frontal headache (worse than MANAGEMENT in symptoms compared to placebo patient has experienced before) • Neurological signs The management guidelines of ARS by (P<0.001) and amoxicillin (P = 0.002). The • Signs of meningitis on clinical examination GPs have been summed up by EPOS same author found INCS to increase the • Reduced level of consciousness 2012.3 Referral for ARS to ENT should be number of ‘minimal-symptom’ days in • Reduced visual acuity immediate for any of the ‘red flag’ signs in patients suffering ARS.11 A Cochrane Review • Double vision (diplopia) • Periorbital oedema/erythema (cellulitis) Box 1. also supported the use of INCS, either • Displaced globe as monotherapy or adjuvant to antibiotics • Opthalmoplegia Antibiotics (when indicated) but these studies also Young et al ’s meta-analysis of antibiotic use relied on the confirmation of diagnosis
612 British Journal of General Practice, November 2013
by radiology or nasendoscopy,12 which There is little evidence to date to REFERENCES 1. Lindbaek M. Acute sinusitis: guide to selection potentially makes the application of this recommend the use of herbal remedies of antibacterial therapy. Drugs 2004; 64(8): review difficult in primary care. In addition, and compounds in treating ARS.3 805–819. a further meta-analysis has found the 2. Ashworth M, Charlton J, Ballard K, et al. benefit of INCS likely to be greater in higher CONCLUSION Variations in antibiotic prescribing and doses and for therapy exceeding 21 days.13 The decision to hold off treatment and consultation rates for acute respiratory infection in UK general practices 1995–2000. Br J Gen Therefore INCS are recommended for use investigations can be difficult for the GP Pract 2005; 55(517): 603–608. in patients with ARS as monotherapy or in when faced with a patient suffering from 3. Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Mullol J, et al. EPOS conjunction with oral antibiotics, when they ARS. There are also well-known issues 2012: European position paper on rhinosinusitis are indicated in severe cases. with the over-prescription of antibiotics and nasal polyps 2012. A summary for otorhinolaryngologists. Rhinology 2012; 50(1): and subsequent problems with microbial 1–12. Saline nasal douche resistance. As such, a conservative 4. Gwaltney JM Jr. Acute community-acquired Nasal saline irrigation enhances the approach in the initial management of ARS sinusitis. Clin Infect Dis 1996; 23(6): 1209–1223; movement of mucus secretions and should be considered. Patients can have a quiz 1224–1205. thins secretions. A systematic review further review after a few days. 5. Adams TB, Wharton CM, Quilter L, Hirsch T. recommended saline douching for adults The association between mental health and ARS is extremely common in primary care. acute infectious illness among a national with ARS and in children with ARS in It presents a large economic burden to an sample of 18- to 24-year-old college students. J conjunction with other medications used already overwhelmed universal healthcare Am Coll Health 2008; 56(6): 657–663. in the treatment of ARS.14 However a system and affects sufferers’ quality of life. 6. Young J, De Sutter A, Merenstein D, et al. Cochrane Review looking at the benefit Immediate referral to an ENT department Antibiotics for adults with clinically diagnosed in URTIs could not prove with confidence must be made for the patient who presents acute rhinosinusitis: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet 2008; 371(9616): a benefit.15 Although nasal irrigation with with any red-flag signs associated with 908–914. saline solution has a limited effect in adults ARS and extra caution should be given 7. Ahovuo-Saloranta A, Borisenko OV, Kovanen with ARS,3 there are no harmful side effects with regards to the immunocompromised N, et al. Antibiotics for acute maxillary sinusitis. to their use and patients using them may Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (2): patient where early referral to a local ENT CD000243. gain some benefit. department should be considered. 8. Hansen FS, Hoffmans R, Georgalas C, Fokkens WJ. Complications of acute rhinosinusitis in The Other therapies Netherlands. Fam Pract 2012; 29(2): 147–153. No benefit has been found in the use of 9. Spurling GK, Del Mar CB, Dooley L, Foxlee R. decongestants or antihistamines in children Delayed antibiotics for respiratory infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (3): with ARS following a Cochrane Review.16 CD004417. Another study found no evidence for the use 10. Meltzer EO, Bachert C, Staudinger H. Treating of antihistamines in adults with ARS, except acute rhinosinusitis: comparing efficacy and in those with co-existing allergic rhinitis.3 Provenance safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray, A Cochrane Review considered the use amoxicillin, and placebo. J Allergy Clin Immunol Freely submitted; not externally peer 2005; 116(6): 1289–1295. of antihistamine–decongestant–analgesic reviewed. 11. Meltzer EO, Gates D, Bachert C. Mometasone combinations for the common cold, finding furoate nasal spray increases the number of some benefit in adults and older children Competing interests minimal-symptom days in patients with acute (none in younger children), but benefits [No competing interests rhinosinusitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol must be weighed against the side effects Discuss this article 2012; 108(4): 275–279. 12. Zalmanovici A, Yaphe J. Intranasal steroids for risks.17 Further studies are required. acute sinusitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Steam inhalation has not been shown to Contribute and read comments about 2009; (4): CD005149. be beneficial and cannot be recommended this article on the Discussion Forum: 13. Hayward G, Heneghan C, Perera R, Thompson on the current evidence base.18 http://www.rcgp.org.uk/bjgp-discuss M. Intranasal corticosteroids in management of acute sinusitis: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Ann Fam Med 2012; 10(3): 241–249. 14. Hildenbrand T, Weber R, Heubach C, Mosges R. [Nasal douching in acute rhinosinusitis]. Laryngorhinootologie 2011; 90(6): 346–351. 15. Kassel JC, King D, Spurling GK. Saline nasal irrigation for acute upper respiratory tract infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (3): CD006821. 16. Shaikh N, Wald ER, Pi M. Decongestants, antihistamines and nasal irrigation for acute sinusitis in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (9): CD007909. 17. De Sutter AI, van Driel ML, Kumar AA, et al. Oral antihistamine-decongestant-analgesic combinations for the common cold. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (2): CD004976. 18. Singh M. Heated, humidified air for the common cold. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (5): CD001728.
British Journal of General Practice, November 2013 613
Copyright of British Journal of General Practice is the property of Royal College of General Practitioners and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.