A Guide To The Management of Acute Rhinosinusitis in Primary Care

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Clinical Intelligence

Neil Foden, Christopher Burgess, Kathryn Shepherd and Robert Almeyda

A guide to the management of acute


rhinosinusitis in primary care
management strategy based on best evidence and recent European guidelines

INTRODUCTION parainfluenza, and influenza with rhinovirus


The terms rhinitis and sinusitis have being the most common. The commonest
been superseded by rhinosinusitis, which organisms in acute bacterial rhinosinusitis
represents the understanding that the two (ABRS) include Streptococcus pneumonia
conditions usually coexist. Rhinosinusitis (41%) and Haemophilus influenza (35%).
can be subdivided into acute and chronic. Other causes include anaerobes, Moraxella,
Acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) presents an Strep spp and Staphylococcus aureus.4
enormous burden in primary care. It is Most cases of ARS are viral. Bacterial
estimated that around 1–2% of visits to a GP rhinosinusitis occurs most commonly
in Europe are for symptoms of ARS.1 secondary to a viral infection. Other risk
ARS is seen across a wide spectrum of factors for ARS include allergies, cigarette
ages, but is less common in the paediatric smoking, and anatomical variation.5
group due to the relative immature Seasonal variations in the incidence of ARS
development of the sinuses in children have also been reported, with cases being
(maxillary and ethmoidal sinuses develop much more likely during the first early
during gestation, whereas the frontal and months of the year.
sphenoid sinuses begin to develop at the
age of 3 years but are not fully developed DEFINITION AND DIAGNOSIS
until late adolescence). A consequence of The European Position Paper on
patients presenting to primary care is the rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps (EPOS 2012)3
associated high pharmacy costs. Ashworth presents an evidence-based approach to
et al found that a prescription for antibiotics the treatment of all types of rhinosinusitis.
was given in 92% of patients with symptoms A definition of ARS in adults for use in
of ARS.2 primary care is:3
This article provides a summary of the
current best evidence for the management Sudden onset of two or more symptoms,
of ARS in primary care and highlights the one of which should be either nasal
recent guidelines provided by the European blockage/obstruction/congestion or nasal
Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal discharge (anterior/posterior nasal drip):
Polyps (EPOS2012).3
+/– facial pain/pressure
AETIOLOGY AND PATHOPHYSIOLOGY +/– reduction or loss of smell
N Foden, MBChB (Hons), SpR in
otolaryngology; C Burgess, BM BCh, SpR The paranasal sinuses are lined by
in otolaryngology; R Almeyda, ORL-HNS, pseudostratified ciliated columnar epithelia for <12 weeks;
consultant in otolaryngology, Department Of containing basal cells, columnar cells, and with symptom free intervals if the problem
Otolaryngology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford.
K Shepherd, MBChB (Hons) GP, Manor Health mucus-secreting goblet cells. Secretions is recurrent, with validation by telephone or
Centre, Wirral. aid humidification, olfaction, and filtration. interview.
Address for correspondence Cilia are crucial to mucus clearance. The
Neil Foden, John Radcliffe Hospital, cilia can be damaged by smoking, chronic ARS becomes chronic rhinosinusitis
Otolaryngology, Headley Way, Oxford, OX3 9DU. nasal disease, or genetic predisposition (CRS) when symptoms persist for more
E-mail: [email protected]
such as primary cilia dyskinesia. When the than 3 months. ARS can be considered as
Submitted: 7 February 2013; final acceptance:
15 March 2013.
clearance of mucus from the paranasal recurrent but only if the previous episode
©British Journal of General Practice 2013; sinuses to the meati of the nose is has fully resolved.
63: 611–613. interrupted, mucus trapping can occur with ARS in children is defined as:3
increased risk of infection.
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X674620 Viral causes of the common cold include Sudden onset of two or more of the
respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), rhinovirus, symptoms:

British Journal of General Practice, November 2013 611


1. nasal blockage/obstruction/congestion in patients with ARS found that 15 patients
2. or discoloured nasal discharge would need to be treated with antibiotics
before a benefit would be seen in a single
3. or cough (day and night time)
case.6 The number needed to treat (NNT)
was lower at 8 for those with a finding
This diagnosis is open and makes of purulent discharge in the pharynx.
differentiation from the common cold The review could not find a justification
difficult. for the use of antibiotics in ARS, even in
A common cold (acute viral rhinosinusitis) those patients with symptoms for more
has duration of symptoms of <10 days. than 7–10 days. This highlights a pitfall in
Acute post-viral rhinosinusitis is seen identifying patients with a bacterial cause
when symptoms worsen after 5 days or who would benefit from antibiotics. It is
symptoms are persistent beyond 10 days difficult to directly compare studies where
but <12 weeks duration. Finally, acute there is no consistent choice or dose of
bacterial rhinosinusitis (ABRS) would be antibiotic. A Cochrane Review found only a
indicated by the presence of at least 3 of: small benefit in patients treated for ARS with
symptoms longer than 7 days in primary
1. discoloured discharge (unilateral care but 80% of patients not treated recover
predominance); within 2 weeks anyway.7 A Dutch study
2. severe local pain (unilateral reported an incidence of complications
predominance); of 3 per million per population annually
3. fever, that is, >38°C; and the prescribing of antibiotics does not
appear to reduce the rate of complications
4. elevated inflammatory markers (CRP);
from ARS.8 A Cochrane Review did not find
and
any deleterious results in patients with
5. ‘double sickening’ whereby the patient’s upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) in
condition deteriorates. whom antimicrobial therapy was delayed.9
Therefore, patients should not be
The majority of patients presenting with prescribed antibiotics routinely or a delayed
symptoms of ARS will have a common cold. antibiotic prescribing strategy could be
This is followed by post-viral rhinosinusitis employed. Antibiotics should be reserved
and only a very small proportion of patients for patients who are systemically unwell;
will have ABRS and therefore will be symptoms are persistent beyond 10 days,
amenable to management with antibiotics. a worsening of symptoms after 5 days, or
There is no role for imaging for suspected in those with severe symptoms after this
ARS in primary care.3 time period (clinically, severe local pain,
fever, discoloured discharge, or double
COMPLICATIONS OF ACUTE sickening).3 If antibiotics are prescribed
RHINOSINUSITIS after weighing up the risks and benefits,
Although relatively rare, the sequelae amoxicillin, doxycycline, or clarithromycin
of complications can be devastating. for 7 days can be considered, with
Complications can be divided into co-amoxiclav as a backup if no improvement
intracranial, bony (osseous), and orbital is seen within the first 48 hours.
with the latter being most common. If patients require antibiotics and still
Orbital complications range from show no signs of improvement, then
preseptal cellulitis to orbital abscess and referral to ENT is required.
cavernous sinus thrombosis. Intracranial
complications usually result in encephalitis Steroids
Box 1. Red flag signs in ARS or abscess. Osteomyelitis can result from Intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) form the
warranting urgent referral to infection of the bone. Finally, an episode of mainstay of treatment in rhinosinusitis.
ENT ARS can become chronic if no resolution Meltzer et al conducted a large trial of 981
Red flags occurs. patients.10 They found INCS as monotherapy
• Frontal swelling in ARS provided a significant improvement
• Severe frontal headache (worse than MANAGEMENT in symptoms compared to placebo
patient has experienced before)
• Neurological signs The management guidelines of ARS by (P<0.001) and amoxicillin (P = 0.002). The
• Signs of meningitis on clinical examination GPs have been summed up by EPOS same author found INCS to increase the
• Reduced level of consciousness 2012.3 Referral for ARS to ENT should be number of ‘minimal-symptom’ days in
• Reduced visual acuity immediate for any of the ‘red flag’ signs in patients suffering ARS.11 A Cochrane Review
• Double vision (diplopia)
• Periorbital oedema/erythema (cellulitis) Box 1. also supported the use of INCS, either
• Displaced globe as monotherapy or adjuvant to antibiotics
• Opthalmoplegia Antibiotics (when indicated) but these studies also
Young et al ’s meta-analysis of antibiotic use relied on the confirmation of diagnosis

612 British Journal of General Practice, November 2013


by radiology or nasendoscopy,12 which There is little evidence to date to
REFERENCES
1. Lindbaek M. Acute sinusitis: guide to selection
potentially makes the application of this recommend the use of herbal remedies
of antibacterial therapy. Drugs 2004; 64(8): review difficult in primary care. In addition, and compounds in treating ARS.3
805–819. a further meta-analysis has found the
2. Ashworth M, Charlton J, Ballard K, et al. benefit of INCS likely to be greater in higher CONCLUSION
Variations in antibiotic prescribing and doses and for therapy exceeding 21 days.13 The decision to hold off treatment and
consultation rates for acute respiratory infection
in UK general practices 1995–2000. Br J Gen Therefore INCS are recommended for use investigations can be difficult for the GP
Pract 2005; 55(517): 603–608. in patients with ARS as monotherapy or in when faced with a patient suffering from
3. Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Mullol J, et al. EPOS conjunction with oral antibiotics, when they ARS. There are also well-known issues
2012: European position paper on rhinosinusitis are indicated in severe cases. with the over-prescription of antibiotics
and nasal polyps 2012. A summary for
otorhinolaryngologists. Rhinology 2012; 50(1):
and subsequent problems with microbial
1–12. Saline nasal douche resistance. As such, a conservative
4. Gwaltney JM Jr. Acute community-acquired Nasal saline irrigation enhances the approach in the initial management of ARS
sinusitis. Clin Infect Dis 1996; 23(6): 1209–1223; movement of mucus secretions and should be considered. Patients can have a
quiz 1224–1205. thins secretions. A systematic review further review after a few days.
5. Adams TB, Wharton CM, Quilter L, Hirsch T. recommended saline douching for adults
The association between mental health and
ARS is extremely common in primary care.
acute infectious illness among a national with ARS and in children with ARS in It presents a large economic burden to an
sample of 18- to 24-year-old college students. J conjunction with other medications used already overwhelmed universal healthcare
Am Coll Health 2008; 56(6): 657–663. in the treatment of ARS.14 However a system and affects sufferers’ quality of life.
6. Young J, De Sutter A, Merenstein D, et al. Cochrane Review looking at the benefit Immediate referral to an ENT department
Antibiotics for adults with clinically diagnosed
in URTIs could not prove with confidence must be made for the patient who presents
acute rhinosinusitis: a meta-analysis of
individual patient data. Lancet 2008; 371(9616): a benefit.15 Although nasal irrigation with with any red-flag signs associated with
908–914. saline solution has a limited effect in adults ARS and extra caution should be given
7. Ahovuo-Saloranta A, Borisenko OV, Kovanen with ARS,3 there are no harmful side effects with regards to the immunocompromised
N, et al. Antibiotics for acute maxillary sinusitis. to their use and patients using them may
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (2):
patient where early referral to a local ENT
CD000243.
gain some benefit. department should be considered.
8. Hansen FS, Hoffmans R, Georgalas C, Fokkens
WJ. Complications of acute rhinosinusitis in The Other therapies
Netherlands. Fam Pract 2012; 29(2): 147–153. No benefit has been found in the use of
9. Spurling GK, Del Mar CB, Dooley L, Foxlee R. decongestants or antihistamines in children
Delayed antibiotics for respiratory infections.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (3):
with ARS following a Cochrane Review.16
CD004417. Another study found no evidence for the use
10. Meltzer EO, Bachert C, Staudinger H. Treating of antihistamines in adults with ARS, except
acute rhinosinusitis: comparing efficacy and in those with co-existing allergic rhinitis.3 Provenance
safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray, A Cochrane Review considered the use
amoxicillin, and placebo. J Allergy Clin Immunol Freely submitted; not externally peer
2005; 116(6): 1289–1295.
of antihistamine–decongestant–analgesic reviewed.
11. Meltzer EO, Gates D, Bachert C. Mometasone combinations for the common cold, finding
furoate nasal spray increases the number of some benefit in adults and older children Competing interests
minimal-symptom days in patients with acute (none in younger children), but benefits [No competing interests
rhinosinusitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol
must be weighed against the side effects Discuss this article
2012; 108(4): 275–279.
12. Zalmanovici A, Yaphe J. Intranasal steroids for
risks.17 Further studies are required.
acute sinusitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Steam inhalation has not been shown to Contribute and read comments about
2009; (4): CD005149. be beneficial and cannot be recommended this article on the Discussion Forum:
13. Hayward G, Heneghan C, Perera R, Thompson on the current evidence base.18 http://www.rcgp.org.uk/bjgp-discuss
M. Intranasal corticosteroids in management of
acute sinusitis: a systematic review and meta-
analysis. Ann Fam Med 2012; 10(3): 241–249.
14. Hildenbrand T, Weber R, Heubach C, Mosges
R. [Nasal douching in acute rhinosinusitis].
Laryngorhinootologie 2011; 90(6): 346–351.
15. Kassel JC, King D, Spurling GK. Saline nasal
irrigation for acute upper respiratory tract
infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;
(3): CD006821.
16. Shaikh N, Wald ER, Pi M. Decongestants,
antihistamines and nasal irrigation for acute
sinusitis in children. Cochrane Database Syst
Rev 2012; (9): CD007909.
17. De Sutter AI, van Driel ML, Kumar AA, et al.
Oral antihistamine-decongestant-analgesic
combinations for the common cold. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev 2012; (2): CD004976.
18. Singh M. Heated, humidified air for the common
cold. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (5):
CD001728.

British Journal of General Practice, November 2013 613


Copyright of British Journal of General Practice is the property of Royal College of General
Practitioners and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a
listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print,
download, or email articles for individual use.

You might also like