Consumer Projection
Consumer Projection
Consumer Projection
Consumer Rights
Right to Safety
The Consumer Protection Act defines this right as a
protection against goods and services that are
‘hazardous to life and property’. This particularly applies
to medicines, pharmaceuticals, foodstuffs, and
automobiles. The right requires all such products of
critical nature to life and property to be carefully tested
and validated before being marketed to the consumer.
Right to Information
This right mentions the need for consumers to be
informed about the quality and quantity of goods being
sold. They must be informed about the price of the
product and have access to other information specific to
the product that they wish to consume.
Right to Choose
The consumer must have the right to choose between
different products at competitive prices. Thus, the
concept of a competitive market where many sellers sell
similar products must be established to ensure that the
consumer can actually choose what to consume and in
what quantity. This is to avoid monopoly in the market.
Right to be Heard
The purpose of this right is to ensure that the consumer
gets due recognition in consumer courts or redressal
forums. Basically, when a consumer feels exploited, he
has the right to approach a consumer court to voice his
complaint. This right gives him/her due respect that
his/her complaint will be duly heard. The right
empowers consumers to fearlessly voice their concerns
and seek justice in case they are exploited.
Right to Consumer Education
Consumers must be aware of their rights and must have
access to enough information while making
consumption decisions. Such information can help them
to choose what to purchase, how much to purchase and
at what price. Many consumers in India are not even
aware that they are protected by the Act. Unless they
know, they cannot seek justice when they are actually
hurt or exploited.
RESPONSIBILITIES
The Responsibility to be aware of the quality and
safety of goods and services before purchasing.
The Responsibility to gather all the information and
facts available about a product or service as well as to
keep abreast of changes and innovations in the
marketplace.
The Responsibility to Think Independently and make
choices about well considered needs and wants.
The Responsibility to Speak Out, to inform
manufacturers and governments of needs and wants.
The Responsibility to Complain and inform business
and other consumers of dissatisfaction with a product
or service in a fair and honest manner.
The Responsibility to be an Ethical Consumer and to
be fair by not engaging in dishonest practices which
cost all consumers money.
The Responsibility to Respect the Environment and
avoid waste, littering and contribution to pollution.
Responsibilities of a Consumer
The consumer has a certain responsibility to carry as an
aware consumer can bring changes in the society and
would help other consumers to fight the unfair practice
or be aware of it.
Case study
1. magi
Maggi noodles was launched in India in 1984 by Nestle.
It is today the highest soldnoodles in India. With 60%
market share (2010 report)in its bowl, Maggi Noodles
continues to be an undisputed leader for almost 30
years
Abstract
The favourite and the most preferred instant food
product of children, magi noodles, got entangled in its
ethical issues of the ingredients being used. The safety
of the consumers was found to be hazardous inclining
us to give its detailed study with facts and figures. The
study focuses on the destructive positioning and its
aftermath. The corporate social responsibility of nestle
india was tremendously cross questioned with its after
test results, by food regulatory authorities. The public
relations of the company got worsely affected with the
issues stated. It made us further focus on its
repositioning state as well as its policies of managing
the crisis period.
The Crisis
Maggi instant noodles came under the scanner for
three main reasons. The first was the aforementioned
violation of the regulations for adding lead and MSG
into the product. As against the maximum limit of 2.50
parts per million (ppm), the amount of lead detected in
the Maggi samples was perilously high at 17.2 ppm.
The second offence was mentioning 'No added MSG'
on the packaging, which is an act of mislabeling. Also, it
launched 'Maggi Oats Masala Noodles' without
meeting the appropriate norms of standardisation. On
June 5, 2015, a nationwide ban was imposed on Maggi
by FSSAI (Food Safety and Standards Authority of
India).
Prior to the ban, Maggi owned nearly 80% of the
market share in the instant noodles segment. In the
blink of an eye, its share plummeted to zero. The crisis
was grave and it was a state of emergency for Nestle
India. The company was neither prepared for it nor did
it have any immediate plan of action to overcome it. It
only played with fire by initially denying the allegations
of hazardous composition of Maggi. But when it was
proven guilty for the second time, the customers were
furious. There were instances of mass protests by
Maggi lovers who were hurt by the severe breach of
trust. Maggi was losing not only its market share but
also credibility. A three decade long relationship was at
stake. It was time to act before it was too late.
Nestle Acts
Nestle had scarcely imagined that this could be its
worst crisis in decades. Perhaps the magnitude of the
controversy was underestimated at the outset. This
was surprising, given that it was a Swiss multinational
corporation. Apparently, the existing leadership was
taken off-guard and could not take a call over the
future plan of action.
To begin with, in June 2015 itself, Nestle announced a
recall of all its instant noodles from the markets. It
began to be executed within two days. At the same
time, the other step was confidence building measures.
It regularly called for press conferences and also
approached the Bombay High Court for relief, following
which the Court permitted export of Maggi to other
countries. Further, Nestle India sought help from APCO
Worldwide, a US based Public Relations firm. They set
up a mechanism for maintaining customer
relationships, be it through a customer services
helpline or posting FAQs regarding recent
developments on its website, not to mention its
presence on social media platforms like Facebook and
Twitter, where representatives answered all sorts of
questions asked by irate customers.
Nestle decided to destoy more than $50million worth
of magi noodles in india after they were deemed
unsafe by regulators
Repositioning of nestle
After the lift of 5 months ban from magi noodles, the
production got started from its tahilwal plant, himachal
Pradesh with its other plants located at nanjangud,
Karnataka,moga, Punjab, goa, and patnagar, himachal
Pradesh
Facts of revival
1. the food regulator FSSAI on 16th november , 2015
moved to supreme court against the Mumbai high
court order to lift a ban on magi noodles in india. The
FSSAI claimed that the high court favoured the
company.
2. the company stated that they would continue with
the existing formula of the product and would not
change their ingredients.
3. the orders of FSSAI and Maharashtra food regulator
fda was annulled by high court for the ban of 9 variants
of magi noodles. The court stated that the hearing was
not given to the manufacturer which does not entail
the natural justice.
3.on august 13, the Bombay high court gave a
significant respite to the company by lifting the ban on
the sale of the noodle, while also ordering fresh tests
to be conducted in three separate labs to ascertain
that the product complied with the country’s food
safety norms. The court order meant the original
product safety certificate of the watchdog remained
valid.
Recommendations
The frequent checks/inspection by the
government regulatory authorities is suggested to
be implemented for avoiding the extreme
situations of crisis’s related to food products.
The philosophy of corporate social responsibility
should not just be a matter of theoretical world
but needs to be compulsively incorporated to
prevent the health hazard of the society.
The food production industries should focus more
on the nutritional constituents of the food rather
than just to enhance its taste to influence the
targeted population.
Conclusion
The nestle india could succeed in sustaining ad regaini
its lost image ..... see phone.
2. dairy milk
Introduction to Case
Cadbury is a brand which almost everyone knows. Even
after completion of more than 100 years, the brand is
into hearts of many people & it also leaves a significant
mark amidst all the competition. Cadbury stands tall in
food product sector. Cadbury is world’s leader in
chocolates and it is also one of the topmost FMCG
brands in India. Cadbury decided to enter Indian
market in 1948. Cadbury India began its operations in
India by importing chocolates. On 19th July 1948
Cadbury was incorporated in India. Cadbury has a
share of over 67% in the market, which is the highest
Cadbury brand share globally. Cadbury now has 5
manufacturing units all over India. Cadbury operates in
India with following categories of products: Chocolate,
Confectionery, Beverages, Biscuits and Candy.Cadbury
was performing very well since its incorporation in
India But, suddenly in 2003 Cadbury came across a
problem of worms.
In 2003, just a month before Diwali few instances of
worms in its Dairy Milk Bars were reported in
Maharashtra. In eight outlets across Maharashtra
worms were found. In October 2003, customers in
Mumbai complained about finding worms in Cadbury
Dairy Milk Bars.
Problems Faced by Cadbury:
When these worms were found in some of the dairy
milk bars, Maharashtra Food and Drugs Administration
responded quickly to this case and it seized the stocks
of chocolate bars which were manufactured in
Cadbury’s Pune Plant.
Cadbury in defense issued a statement where it
mentioned that problem of worms was not at the
manufacturing stage but the problem arose due to
poor storage facility by the retailers.
Recovery Strategy:
Project Vishwas:
Cadbury was losing on its sales and also reputation was
being hampered. So, recovering from this type of
situation was a challenge for Cadbury. In the month of
October only Cadbury launched Public Relations (PR)
campaign ‘Vishwas’ which was an education initiative
covering 190,000 retailers in key states.
Change in Packaging:
January 2004, the company launched a new
Ad Campaign:
Current Situation:
After that Incident Cadbury now takes great care of all
the products they have. Cadbury is currently leading
the market in chocolates segment. Market share of the
Cadbury Dairy Milk is around 35% in India. Cadbury
has not faced any controversy related to products after
that incident.