Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 32 views

    Poster Feb 29 2016 DSA Decision Frame Final Released

    Uploaded by

    Anonymous K5KWaphi
    This framework provides a map for the relationship between various interrelated systems in applying DSA. It identifies five levels of well construction that correspond to levels in the Purdue/ISA-95 reference model, from enterprise management to physical processes. The diagram demonstrates how a Manufacturing Execution System interacts with control levels. It highlights workflows in well construction execution and locates onsite and remote centers relative to the hierarchy.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Poster Feb 29 2016 DSA Decision Frame Final Released

    Uploaded by

    Anonymous K5KWaphi
    32 views1 page
    This framework provides a map for the relationship between various interrelated systems in applying DSA. It identifies five levels of well construction that correspond to levels in the Purdue/ISA-95 reference model, from enterprise management to physical processes. The diagram demonstrates how a Manufacturing Execution System interacts with control levels. It highlights workflows in well construction execution and locates onsite and remote centers relative to the hierarchy.

    Original Description:

    asdas

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This framework provides a map for the relationship between various interrelated systems in applying DSA. It identifies five levels of well construction that correspond to levels in the Purdue/ISA-95 reference model, from enterprise management to physical processes. The diagram demonstrates how a Manufacturing Execution System interacts with control levels. It highlights workflows in well construction execution and locates onsite and remote centers relative to the hierarchy.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    32 views1 page

    Poster Feb 29 2016 DSA Decision Frame Final Released

    Uploaded by

    Anonymous K5KWaphi
    This framework provides a map for the relationship between various interrelated systems in applying DSA. It identifies five levels of well construction that correspond to levels in the Purdue/ISA-95 reference model, from enterprise management to physical processes. The diagram demonstrates how a Manufacturing Execution System interacts with control levels. It highlights workflows in well construction execution and locates onsite and remote centers relative to the hierarchy.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    DSA Decision Making and Control Framework

    Program Manager: John de Wardt, DE WARDT AND CO


    [email protected] Photo
    Permitted

    A
    Purdue Model
    Computer Integrated Website: www.dsaroadmap.org
    Manufacturing (CIM) model created List value
    in 1989 at the International Purdue
    Workshop on Industrial Computer
    Purpose of the DSA Decision and Control making Framework from DSA
    This framework provides a map for the relationship of various interrelated systems in the application of DSA.
    Systems.
    The five levels for well construction identified on the left-hand side of the graphic and listed below correspond to the five layers defined in the framework
    It was developed to improve the Purdue / ISA-95 reference model:
    probability that a truly integrated • Level 4 - Enterprise management. Managing business-related activities of the drilling operation (business planning and logistics).
    information system could be rapidly
    achieved.
    • Level 3 - Operations management. Managing workflows to drill, protect the hole, and complete the well.
    • Level 2 - Execution management. Supervising, monitoring, and controlling the physical processes with real-time controls and software.
    This model provides a construct of • Level 1 - Machine control. Sensing and manipulating the physical processes.
    the relationships connected to shop • Level 0 - Physical processes. Defining actual physical processes of the drilling and completion operation (Well construction).
    floor activities.

    Original Purdue - 1989

    List issues
    that need
    review in
    the
    framework

    International Automation Society – ISA 95


    Enterprise-control system integration

    MES Impact
    This diagram demonstrates the
    interaction of the Manufacturing
    Execution Systems with the levels of
    control in ISA 95.

    The planning, design and execution work List items


    flows through the levels within the
    hierarchy provide a basis for development
    States Definition for Automation that need
    of similar workflows for drilling planning
    and operations This “state machine” concept of the drilling process is fundamental to drilling to be
    systems automation, and all tasks, models and activities during drilling correlate
    with the current state of the drilling process. Consequently, it is critical that the expanded
    current state be well known and communicated to all users, and that the transition in their
    to a new state be broadcast simultaneously to all users in real time.
    Manufacturing Execution System Systems and Centers description
    Overview of terms with regard to ISA 95 levels This version highlights the work flows in the Well Construction Epics, User Stories and Use Cases in the
    Execution System and Data Acquisition. It also locates the onsite and
    remote centers relative to the hierarchy.
    The combination of epics (drill a stand), user stories (fast, safe connection), and use
    cases (discrete activities) provides the framework to identify systematic needs from
    framework
    The distinction between control / operations and interpretation / the automation system providing the industry with a framework to track and control
    excellence centers is that the former performs in the supervisory what is happening during any automated activity, including sharing a common
    control loop and the latter analyses data to feed new parameters to understanding of the intent of the controlling automation system at any time.
    the former.

    You might also like