Well Control
Well Control
Well Control
Well Control
PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
Geology
PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
Sedimentation
3 PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
Pore Pressure
• Normal formation
pressure is equal to the
4 PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
Normal Pore Pressure
MW Gradients Example area
Fresh water 8.3 ppg .433 psi/ft Rocky mountain
5 PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
Overburden Pressure
• Overburden pressure is
total pressure exerted
Column of formation
by the formation
weight (fluid + rock)
• Overburden pressure
usually is in the range
of 19 – 21 ppg.
6 PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
Example 1
• Assume Normal pore
pressure to calculate
formation /overburden
pressure at the bottomhole
• Ppore = 8.5 ppg
5500 ft
• Poverburden = 1 psi/ft
Solution
= 2430 psi
Poverburden = 1 psi/ft × 5500
= 5500 psi
7 PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
Fracture Pressure
8 PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
Example 2
• If the fracture gradient at the
bottomhole is 0.8 psi/ft
estimate the required
bottomhole pressure to
5500 ft
fracture the formation.
Solution
= 4400 psi
9 PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
Basics of Well Control
PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
Equivalent Mud Weight
• Pressure usually is expressed in equivalent
mud weight (ppg) or gradient.
HP 0.052 ppg TVD
HP
ppg
0.052 TVD
psi
PressureGradient 0.052 ppg
ft
11 PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
Example 3
• What is the equivalent mud weight for a
reservoir at the depth of 12000 ft with
8000 psi pressure? What is the minimum
mud weight to drill into the reservoir?
HP
ppg
0.052 TVD
8000
ppg 12.82 Equivalent mud weight
0.052 12000
Solution
• Minimum mud weight = 12.9 ppg
12 PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
Pressure Calculation
• The general pressure calculation Psurface
equation considers pressure at the
surface.
HP Psurface 0.052 ppg TVD
14 PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
U-Tube
Drill String Annulus
• U-tube is a simple
schematic of the
well used for well
control purposes.
• The simple concept
of u-tube is
consistent BHP from
drillstring and
annulus.
BHP
15 PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
Example 5
350 psi
? ppg
14 ppg
6000 ft
in the left column to
balance the pressure at
the bottomhole.
BHP
16 PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
Example 5 - Solution
350 psi
6000 ft
4720 0.052 ? ppg 6000
? ppg 15.12
MW of drilling fluid 15.2
If you workout LHS and RHS parametric
Psurface
? ppg MWppg
0.052 TVD
BHP
17 PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
Frictional Pressure
• To circulate the mud in the well, energy is
needed to overcome frictional pressure in
the circulation system
– Drillstring
– Nozzles
– Annulus
• In most cases during well control operation,
annular pressure drop can be ignored.
18 PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
Pressure Drop Estimation
• Killing is done using a heavier mud.
• Heavier mud has higher pressure drop
• If the rheological properties of mud stays
the same, the pressure loss in the system
estimated using
MWKill
Pkill Poriginal
MWoriginal
19 PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
Goal of Well Control
20 PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
Kill Weight Mud
• Kill weight mud calculation is the same
as the one in Example 5.
• From Example 5
Psurface
MWkill MWoriginal
0.052 TVD
21 PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
Keep The BHP Constant
22 PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
Initial Circulating Pressure
Pstandpipe
• Initial circulating pressure
is equal to the sum of
23 PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
Final Circulating Pressure
Pstandpipe
• The pressure required to circulate
the mud at the SPR, when the kill
24 PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
ICP - FCP
• Initial circulating pressure is greater than
FCP.
• As the kill mud displaces the original mud
in the drillpipe
– Hydrostatic pressure increases.
– Frictional pressure increases.
• The HP is greater than frictional pressure
increase.
• As the result of these two factors
circulating pressure drops.
25 PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
ICP – FCP (cont.)
26 PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
Drillpipe Pressure Schedule
2500
2500
5100
28 PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
Casing Pressure
PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
Kill Sheet
• TVD=6000 ft • Pump factor = 0.09 bbl/stk
PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
Pre-recorded Information
0.1
14.0
30 420 30 420
32 PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
Wait & Weight Worksheet
Round up to the accuracy of 0.1 ppg
33 PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
Drill String Volume & Stroke Calculations
34 PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
Annular Volume & Stroke Calculations
35 PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
Annular Volume & Stroke Calculations
36 PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
RECORDED KICK INFORMATION
10000 15.0
10000 920
500 450
750 171.19
20 1712
14.0 896.27
1354.8
30 8962.7
3.0 10674.7
37 PETE 225-lab
© Copyright, 2005, TAMU
Pressure
920
Chart 171.2 873
342.4 826
513.6 779
684.8 732
856 685
1027.2 638
1198.4 591
1369.6 544
1540.8 497
1712 450
10674.7 450