Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 146 views

    Revisioner

    Uploaded by

    JeromeKmt
    1) On April 5, 1933, the US government took physical possession of citizens' gold but people retained equitable title to constitute lawful money to avoid charges of theft. 2) Two codes - 12 USC 411 and 95a(2) - provide access to lawful money upon demand and assure full discharge of obligations upon transfer of payments to the US. 3) A Certificate of Live Birth creates a legal persona for the infant and associated equitable title to their labor/property that can be reclaimed by proving life, then transferred to the US to discharge obligations incurred by the infant.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Revisioner

    Uploaded by

    JeromeKmt
    146 views1 page
    1) On April 5, 1933, the US government took physical possession of citizens' gold but people retained equitable title to constitute lawful money to avoid charges of theft. 2) Two codes - 12 USC 411 and 95a(2) - provide access to lawful money upon demand and assure full discharge of obligations upon transfer of payments to the US. 3) A Certificate of Live Birth creates a legal persona for the infant and associated equitable title to their labor/property that can be reclaimed by proving life, then transferred to the US to discharge obligations incurred by the infant.

    Original Description:

    Revisioner

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1) On April 5, 1933, the US government took physical possession of citizens' gold but people retained equitable title to constitute lawful money to avoid charges of theft. 2) Two codes - 12 USC 411 and 95a(2) - provide access to lawful money upon demand and assure full discharge of obligations upon transfer of payments to the US. 3) A Certificate of Live Birth creates a legal persona for the infant and associated equitable title to their labor/property that can be reclaimed by proving life, then transferred to the US to discharge obligations incurred by the infant.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    146 views1 page

    Revisioner

    Uploaded by

    JeromeKmt
    1) On April 5, 1933, the US government took physical possession of citizens' gold but people retained equitable title to constitute lawful money to avoid charges of theft. 2) Two codes - 12 USC 411 and 95a(2) - provide access to lawful money upon demand and assure full discharge of obligations upon transfer of payments to the US. 3) A Certificate of Live Birth creates a legal persona for the infant and associated equitable title to their labor/property that can be reclaimed by proving life, then transferred to the US to discharge obligations incurred by the infant.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    Full Discharge via Lawful Money Reversionary Interest Transfer Instrument

    per 12 USC 411 & 95a(2)

    On April 5, 1933, the physical possession and legal title to lawful money (gold) was taken from the
    people. But the people had to retain the equitable title to this lawful money or else it would have
    amounted to theft, and McFadden’s charges of theft and treason on May 23, 1993 lodged with the
    Judiciary would have had to been prosecuted. These charges were mitigated by the passing of HJR 192
    on June 5, 1933 which provided for the possibility of “discharge upon payment” of all obligations. This
    remedy was subtly effected by two United States Codes: 1) 12 USC 411 which provides access to this
    lawful money “upon demand”, and 2) 12 USC 95a(2) which assures “full discharge” of all obligations
    upon assignment or transfer of payments to the United States. Later, the State provided people a
    Certificate of Live Birth (COLB) as evidence of the people’s equitable title to their labor taken by the
    State at birth (to mitigate similar charges of theft and involuntary servitude).

    This COLB creates a PERSON identified by the NAME of an INFANT that is presumed abandoned by the
    mother/informant at a birth event and, after seven years of non-appearance/activity, is also presumed
    dead, enabling the State to become the Executor of the INFANT’s “estate” in probate. However, this
    presumption of death always has the possibility of being rebutted by a subsequent “appearance” of the
    INFANT as being “alive”. Therefore, this equitable title exists in the form of a “reversionary interest”
    in this INFANT’s property/labor “estate”. Once Proof of Life for INFANT is established, said
    “reversionary interest” in the decedent’s estate re-vests in the INFANT as the “living beneficiary” of
    same. Said INFANT must thereafter, in order to honorably perform the terms of the 1933 constructive
    trust to discharge obligations incurred by said INFANT, assign or transfer (partially or wholly) said
    “reversionary interest”, in the form of lawful money demanded (12 USC 411), to the United States
    who, in turn, as trustee thereof, must then apply said lawful money interest payment as full discharge
    of the obligation to the extent thereof by operation of law (12 USC 95a(2)).

    So, how is this assignment or transfer performed by the INFANT when bills/obligations are received
    by the INFANT?

    See the proposed sample in this folder of how a “bill” looks when it becomes a transfer instrument to
    effect this transfer, named Lawful Money Reversionary Interest Transfer Instrument-sample.pdf

    Notice that the amount on the bill is a positive number – representing the CREDIT of the NATION
    extended by the people in the form of labor expended to produce all of the products and services in the
    nation. The INFANT holds the equitable title to this CREDIT, and is liable to release this credit to the
    United States as payment. The bill just needs the INFANT’s authorization/instruction added to it to
    properly transfer this equitable title to the United States. Then both the legal and equitable titles of
    both the credit and the obligation amounts are now vested in that one piece of paper, and when that
    signed instrument is returned to the party that sent it, then that party is now the Holder in due course
    of the legal and equitable titles to both the asset and liability amounts for that account and must then
    present that Lawful Money Reversionary Interest Transfer Instrument to the United
    States as payment, or else, by refusal to present payment to the United States or to provide in return
    evidence of dishonor of same by the Unites States for acceptance for honor supra protest, the debt is
    discharged by operation of law (UCC 3-603, as enacted in State general statutes and codes) for the
    INFANT, and the Holder in due course of that instrument is now liable for that payment..

    You might also like