Cold Pressor Test As A Predictor of Hypertension
Cold Pressor Test As A Predictor of Hypertension
Cold Pressor Test As A Predictor of Hypertension
Original Article
1
Department of Physiology, Nepal Medical College, Kathmandu, Nepal.
2
Nepal Medical College, Kathmandu, Nepal.
3
Ganesh Man Singh Memorial Academy of ENT and Head and Neck Studies, TU Teaching Hospital,
Kathmandu, Nepal.
Abstract
Background: Early detection of proneness to hypertension may help an individual to lead a healthy life by altering the life
style. Subjects having the predisposing factors of hypertension tend to show higher and prolonged responsiveness to blood
pressure following stress.
Methods: Normotensive, non-smoking healthy sedentary male students and staff of Nepal Medical College (n=50, age
group 18-35 years) participated in the study, conducted between May 2008 and June 2008. Participants with hypertensive
parents, either or both, were considered volunteers from hypertensive families. The cold pressor test was carried out. The
changes in blood pressure and heart rate among the volunteers of the hypertensive and normotensive families were compared
using Student’s t-test.
Results: In the present study, sympathetic stimulation exerted through the cold pressor test resulted in an elevation of
blood pressure and heart rate in all the young male normotensive individuals. Blood pressure and heart rate returned to the
baseline 5 minutes after the withdrawal of the stressor in the cases of the volunteers with no history of familial hypertension.
On the other hand, the subjects whose parents, either or both, were reported to be hypertensive showed elevated diastolic
blood pressure even 5 minutes after the withdrawal of the stressor.
Conclusion: The present study revealed that the normotensive young male subjects who presented prolonged elevated
diastolic pressure in response to sympathetic stimulation through the cold pressor test were prone to develop hypertension
in the future.
J Teh Univ Heart Ctr 3 (2009) 177-180
*
Corresponding Author: Prakash Adhikari, Department of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, Ganesh Man Singh Memorial Academy of ENT and Head
and Neck Studies, TU Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal. Tel: +977 9851015002. Email: [email protected].
have an exaggerated stress-induced cardiovascular response either or both, were currently on antihypertensive drugs and
at a younger age.5 The sympathetic nervous system plays whether or not they were diabetic. Volunteers whose parents
a prime role in the pathogenesis of essential hypertension. were non-diabetic, hypertensive, or normotensive were
Subjects with a positive history of familial hypertension, included in the study. Participants either of whose parents
high resting heart rate, or transient increase in arterial was reported hypertensive were considered volunteers from
hypertension are reported to have revealed blood pressure hypertensive families. Among the study population (Nepalese
hyper-responsiveness to stress stimuli mediated by an over- population of the said age group) the normal blood pressure
activity of the sympathetic nervous system.6 among the males was found to be around 118/73 mmHg10
After being stimulated by a stressor, the sympathetic system and blood pressure more than 140/90 mmHg was regarded
triggers a rise in heart rate and blood pressure; nevertheless, as hypertension.9
heart rate and blood pressure usually tend to return to normal First, heart rate and blood pressure were recorded from
levels within a very short period of time after the withdrawal the left hand. The sphygmomanometer cuff was kept in situ
of the stressor.7 Elevated blood pressure and heart rate prevail for the next measurement of blood pressure. The right hand
for a longer time in the susceptible individual. Naturally, of the subject was immersed in a mixture of ice and water
the persons presenting higher cardiovascular reactivity to a (4˚C) for 1 minute (Cold pressor test). At the completion
stressor and slower rate of recovery after the withdrawal of of the one minute, blood pressure and heart rate were
the stressor causing the sympathetic stimulation may be at a measured and the subject was asked to remove his hand
high risk of developing hypertension in their future life. The from the cold water.11 The subject’s hand was thereafter
present study was designed to explore the cardiovascular wrapped up in a warm towel for 3 minutes, and he was
reactivity to stress (cold stress) and the recovery time after the allowed to rest. Five minutes after the cold pressor test, heart
withdrawal of the stressor in normotensive young adults. rate and blood pressure were noted once more (recovery).
Table 1. Base line, stress and recovery heart rate and blood pressure in normotensive and hypertensive families*
............Volunteers........................Conditions............................HR...............................SBP (mmHg)...................DBP (mmHg)...................MP (mmHg)..........
Normotensive Baseline 74.28±10.56 112.24±10.05 71.04±9.86 84.77±9.24
Family (n=25) 4˚C exposure 74.76±10.38 118.72±10.21** 75.05±10.01 89.59±9.42
Recovery 73.92±10.00 112.96±9.34 71.52±9.47 85.33±8.87
178
Cold Pressor Test as a Predictor of Hypertension
TEHRAN HEART CENTER
return to the baseline following the aforesaid experimental both- were hypertensive) showed greater and prolonged
condition. responsiveness to sympathetic stimulation in comparison to
the subjects from the non-hypertensive families, indicating
the hyper responsiveness of the sympathetic nervous system
Discussion to stressor stimuli in the offspring of hypertensive adults.
13. Keele CA, Neil E, Joels N. The heart and circulation. In: Keele CA, Neil
E, Joels N, eds. Samson Wright's Applied Physiology. 13th ed. Oxford/
New York: Oxford university Press; 1996. p. 65-152.
14. Widgren BR. Wikstrand J, Berglund G. Andersson OK. Increased
response to physical and mental stress in men with hypertensive parents.
Hypertension 1992;20:606-611.
15. Tortora GJ, Grabowski SR. Measuring blood pressure. In: Tortora GJ,
Grabowski SR, eds. Principles of anatomy and physiology. 9th ed. New
York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc; 2000. p. 670-737.
180