Memorandum of Agreement (MOA)
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA)
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA)
Instead, the Court focused on resolving these questions: is donor’s tax a direct
or indirect tax? Consequently, who is liable to pay for it?
Of course, it is a safe assumption that the BIR is well aware that donor’s tax is
a direct tax that should be paid by the giver or contributor. In fact, the term
“donor’s tax” already implies that it is a tax on the donor, and not on the
recipient.
Further, all the relevant requirements to pay the tax point toward the donor as
the party that must report, file, and pay the tax. Nowhere is there a
requirement that the donee must pay for the tax, whether directly or in behalf
of the donor.
However, in trying to justify the filing of the case against the donee, it is evident
that the BIR was mindful of the fact that the donor was a foreign entity beyond
its tax jurisdiction. Unable to enforce its authority on the donor, the BIR
instead went after the taxpayer-donee, a domestic corporation subject to the
laws of the Philippines.
The CTA disagreed with the BIR. As the tax sought to be imposed is a donor’s
tax, the Court ruled that a donee may not be made liable for its payment.
Section 13 of Revenue Regulation No. 2-2003 explicitly provides that the
person making a donation shall be the one required to accomplish and file a
donor’s tax return. This is in line with Section 98 of the Tax Code, which
provides that the donor’s tax shall be levied on the transfer by any person,
resident or nonresident, of a property by gift.
Thus, it is clear under the law, as well as the BIR’s regulations, that the
donor’s tax is a direct tax that can only be imposed on, and paid by, the donor.
Consequently, the CTA ruled that the liability for donor’s tax falls on the
donor’s shoulders and is, therefore, not transferable.
This case is novel in the sense that the principle of “non-transferability of the
burden of direct tax” had not been previously applied to donor’s tax. Although
the Supreme Court (SC) already had occasion to explain the nature of direct
and indirect taxes, jurisprudence only goes so far as to state that transfer
taxes, specifically donor’s tax, are classified as direct taxes. The recent CTA
case, therefore, is the first court decision to directly apply the said principle to
donor’s taxes.
There were other issues left undecided by the CTA because answering the
question on who should bear the tax seemed the end of it. However, it would
have been equally important, if not more so, to discuss whether additional
capital contribution should be considered a donation in the first place.
For now, we may have to wait for the resolution of the BIRs’ appeal to see if this
other equally important issue will be tackled more directly -- pardon the pun.
Unfortunately, until the BIR reconsiders this position, other taxpayers may find
it necessary to contest similar assessments or impositions.
The views or opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and
do not necessarily represent those of Isla Lipana & Co. The firm will not accept
any liability arising from the article.
Not so, with the issuance of Revenue Regulations (RR) No. 12-2018,
the consolidated regulations governing the imposition and payment of
estate and donor’s taxes, implementing the provisions of Republic Act
(RA) No. 10963, or the “Tax Reform for Acceleration and Inclusion”
(TRAIN) Law.
The donor’s tax for each calendar year is now at a uniform rate of 6
percent, which is imposed on the “net gifts” received by the donee
(recipient of the donation) in excess of the P250,000.00 threshold for
exempt gifts, and is computed on a cumulative basis over a period of
one calendar year. “Net gifts” is defined as the “net economic benefit
from the transfer that accrues to the donee.”
The donor’s tax shall not be applicable unless and until there is a
“completed gift.” A donation of property is perfected from the
moment the donor knows of the acceptance of the donee, and is
completed by the delivery of the property to the donee. The applicable
law at the time of the perfection/completion of the donation shall
determine the imposition of the donor’s tax. Thus, the 6 percent
donor’s tax shall only be applicable to donations that have been
perfected or completed on or after January 1, 2018, the the date of
effectivity of the TRAIN Law.
Generally, when property is transferred for less than its FMV at the
time of the execution of the Deed of Sale, the difference between the
FMV and the selling price for the property shall be deemed a gift and
shall be included in computing the amount of gifts received by the
donee for the calendar year.