Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 54 views

    Claims - Evidence - Reasoning (C-E-R) Writing Graphic Organizer / 7th

    Uploaded by

    Toot Scoot
    1. The document presents a CER (Claim-Evidence-Reasoning) graphic organizer discussing whether electromagnetic radiation from cell phones are dangerous to human health. 2. The claim is that cell phone radiation is not dangerous, and evidence includes that brain cancer rates decreased as cell phone use increased yearly and cell phones deliver non-ionizing radiation in small doses unlike atomic bombs. 3. Reasoning includes that a study found no link between increased cell phone use and brain cancer in England from 1985 to 2007.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Claims - Evidence - Reasoning (C-E-R) Writing Graphic Organizer / 7th

    Uploaded by

    Toot Scoot
    54 views4 pages
    1. The document presents a CER (Claim-Evidence-Reasoning) graphic organizer discussing whether electromagnetic radiation from cell phones are dangerous to human health. 2. The claim is that cell phone radiation is not dangerous, and evidence includes that brain cancer rates decreased as cell phone use increased yearly and cell phones deliver non-ionizing radiation in small doses unlike atomic bombs. 3. Reasoning includes that a study found no link between increased cell phone use and brain cancer in England from 1985 to 2007.

    Original Description:

    Conceptual Physics Project

    Original Title

    Cer_Conceptual_Physics

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1. The document presents a CER (Claim-Evidence-Reasoning) graphic organizer discussing whether electromagnetic radiation from cell phones are dangerous to human health. 2. The claim is that cell phone radiation is not dangerous, and evidence includes that brain cancer rates decreased as cell phone use increased yearly and cell phones deliver non-ionizing radiation in small doses unlike atomic bombs. 3. Reasoning includes that a study found no link between increased cell phone use and brain cancer in England from 1985 to 2007.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    54 views4 pages

    Claims - Evidence - Reasoning (C-E-R) Writing Graphic Organizer / 7th

    Uploaded by

    Toot Scoot
    1. The document presents a CER (Claim-Evidence-Reasoning) graphic organizer discussing whether electromagnetic radiation from cell phones are dangerous to human health. 2. The claim is that cell phone radiation is not dangerous, and evidence includes that brain cancer rates decreased as cell phone use increased yearly and cell phones deliver non-ionizing radiation in small doses unlike atomic bombs. 3. Reasoning includes that a study found no link between increased cell phone use and brain cancer in England from 1985 to 2007.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 4

    Claims – Evidence – Reasoning (C-E-R) Writing Graphic Organizer / 7th

    Remember​: The purpose of this Graphic Organizer is to help make connections between the claim, the evidence of
    that claim, and the reason that the evidence supports that claim. The order that you use it doesn’t matter (questions
    first, claim first, evidence first, or reason first).
    Question

    Are electromagnetic radiation waves from cell phones dangerous to human health?

    Claim

    Electromagnetic waves from cell phones are not dangerous to human health.

    Reason 1 Transition Evidence Source


    Words
    Cell Phone https://fortuned
    use per day 1. As an otcom.files.wor
    increased illustration… dpress.com/201
    yearly, but . 1/07/cellphone_
    the amount use_vs_brain_c
    of new 2.In ancer.jpg?quali
    brain general... ty=80
    cancer
    diagnoses
    decreased
    over the
    years.

    Reason 2 Transition Evidence Source


    Words
    Cell Phones Dale Preston, a leading expert in radiation induced https://drive.go
    deliver non 2. And… cancers, says there’s no sign of a “sudden spike of ogle.com/file/d/
    ionizing risk” in any of his research on cancer in bomb survivors. 0B6y0PD5RPIh
    radiation in 3. With this In fact he suspects tumors were already GdzNYRlp6M2
    thousands in mind…. increasing in frequency in the 1950s, before the records dKaG8/view?us
    of small were being kept. He is skeptical about drawing p=sharing
    doses. parallels between atomic bomb radiation and cell phone
    radiation (since the A-Bombs deliver ionizing
    radiation in one big dose, while cell phones deliver
    non-ionizing radiation in thousands of small doses.)
    Reason 3 Transition Evidence Source
    Words
    There is no Hopefully the evidence will continue to mount. In the https://drive.go
    link 1.Then.. current issue of Bio-Electromagnetics a study of ogle.com/file/d/
    between the brain cancer in England found that “the increased use of 0B6y0PD5RPIh
    increased 2.And... mobile phones between 1985 and 2003 has not GdzNYRlp6M2
    use of cell led to a noticeable change in the incidence of brain cancer dKaG8/view?us
    phones and in England between 1998 and 2007.” p=sharing
    harmful
    effects such
    as brain
    cancer.

    Transition Conclusion
    Words
    Electromagnetic waves from cell phones are not dangerous to human health.
    1. As shown When the cell phone usage increased yearly, the total number of brain
    above…. cancer diagnoses dropped. Cell phones deliver much less radiation in
    extremely small amounts unlike atomic bombs that deliver huge amounts of
    2.To radiation all at once. And a study found no correlation between increased
    summarize... cell phone usage and brain cancer.

    Adapted from: Sandra Yellenberg SCCOE ​https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Nje-XeDNC8eJsMG4SN2VkbFqWnpX0T7k

    You might also like