Chennai Radha Engineering Works (P) LTD.: Near Miss / Incident Report & Investigation Form

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

CREW-OHSAS-FRM-040-

CHENNAI RADHA ENGINEERING WORKS (P) LTD. DOC NO: IVR-001

SITE: JSW/PORT
NEAR MISS / INCIDENT
REPORT & INVESTIGATION FORM DATE: 30/03/2017

1. Person(s) Involved:

Name: Mr.Nooki naidu & Mr.Mathan

Contact No: 78887991172 & 9075048859 Department / Section: Mechanical & operation

Employee: Visitor: Contractor: Other (Specify): Machine

2. Details of near miss / incident :

Site / Location: Ship Unloader No.3

Date: 30.03.2017 Shift: A Time: 07:30AM

3. Severity level of the Incident:

Fatal Serious Harm Minor Harm No Harm Y

4. Treatment Given:

Nil First Aid MTI Hospitalized

What treatment was given?

By Whom N

5. Description of what happened:-


During unloading operation of MV. Q HOUSTON, In SUL-03, the main hoist rope ( LHO & RHO ) quick release links
were broken due to sudden impact load on the hoist rope. Grab filled with excess cargo so tripped due to overload. Then
operator tried to open the grab to release excess cargo, at that moment these incident was happened.

6. Describe the cause /potential cause of the near miss / incident / accident: -
1) Sudden jerks created during unloading could have caused main hoist LHO & RHO quick release link to split into two half

2) The material constituting the quick release link may also be weak.

3) There was a delay on showing overload warning/trip.

Contributory Factors (refer to these when identifying the cause of the near miss / incident / accident)
Immediate Causes Substandard Acts
- Guarding - Operating without authority
- Defective tools or equipment - Disabling safety devices [ Y ]
- Hazardous arrangements - Using unsafe equipment
- Unsafe conditions - Non-use of Personal Protective Equipment
- Unsafe design - Non-use of PTW, lock out / isolation systems
- Housekeeping - Unsafe positioning (Y)
- Environmental conditions - Distraction / fooling about

Please complete the other side of this form

June 2005
Has a significant hazard been identified? [No] Y/N
If yes, please investigate this hazard and update the Hazard Register in your department or section accordingly

7. Chance of the near miss, incident or accident recurring:

One of Daily Weekly Monthly 6 Monthly +

8. Corrective Action: (What will be done to minimise the risk of this happening again)
Suggested Action Responsible

1) SUL operator were advised for do not open the grab during
Overload condition. Down the grab immediately. _ Operation
2) Load cell calibration to be done. _ E&I
3) Quick release coupling calibration to be done. _ MMD
4) Training required from OEM for better operation _ Operation

Person in control of the workplace: Name: Pankaj A Churi

Signed: Position: Operation In\cCharge – CREW BERTH-3A & 6A

9. Manager and Investigation team’s Comments:

After investigation we found many observation points behind it which should be rectified immediately to avoid such type of
incidents reoccurring in future. We also discussed about all the above observation points to our SUL operators and Attenders in tool
box meeting & create awareness regarding this to avoid the same in future.
Signed: Mr. K. Senthil Kumar Position: Resident Manager- CREW BERTH-3A & 6A
Date: 25/03/2017

June 2005

You might also like