17 - Debajit Mahanta - OM05: Solution To Question-7 (pg-451)

Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 8

17_Debajit Mahanta_OM05

Solution to Question-7 (pg-451)

Spectragen's purchasing department has developed the following estimates:

Anneal Outsourcing
in-house annealing
Number of parts per year 25000 25000
Fixed cost per year ($) 85000 0
Variable cost per part ($) 32 38

So total cost per year,


For annealing in house ($) 885000 (Fixed cost+variable cost)
For outsourcing annealing ($) 950000 (Fixed cost+variable cost)

Since total cost for outsourcing annealing is more than anneal in-house so Spectragen Inc. should purchase the a
n Inc. should purchase the annealing equipment and anneal the parts.
17_Debajit Mahanta_OM05

Solution to Question-7 (pg-453)

Matrix

Performance factor Factor weight Economic data($) Rating/score


Price 0.15 68 1
Delivery schedule 0.25 0.8
Schedule reliability 0.25 0.4
Video card quality 0.2 0.8
Video card features 0.15 0.5
Total aggregate score
in performance

So from the above observation I would recommend vendor AVG since its aggregate weighted score of 0.74 is more t

The following factors would be important in such a decision:

(a) The performance of the supplier


(b) The satisfaction level of the customers
(c ) The existing market share of both the Matrix and AVG
hanta_OM05

Matrix AVG

Weighted score Economic data($) Rating/score Weighted score


0.15 76 0.89 0.13
0.2 0.8 0.20
0.1 0.6 0.15
0.16 0.6 0.12
0.075 0.9 0.14

0.685 0.74

aggregate weighted score of 0.74 is more than the weighted score of 0.685 for Matrix.
17_Debajit Mahanta_OM05

Solution to Case Acme

1. Ans: The POM software library has been used to solve the transportation problem

2. Ans: From the POM software I have got the following details

Assembly department
Fabrication 1 2 3
department
A 0 2000 10000
B 0 19000 0
C 5000 0 4000

Explanation of the above solution:


From the abobe table the following has been observed to minimize the total monthly costs,

Number of products that should be transferred from fabrication department A to assembly department 1
Number of products that should be transferred from fabrication department A to assembly department 2
Number of products that should be transferred from fabrication department A to assembly department 3

Number of products that should be transferred from fabrication department B to assembly department 1
Number of products that should be transferred from fabrication department B to assembly department 2
Number of products that should be transferred from fabrication department B to assembly department 3

Number of products that should be transferred from fabrication department C to assembly department 1
Number of products that should be transferred from fabrication department C to assembly department 2
Number of products that should be transferred from fabrication department C to assembly department 3

3. Ans: Given that,

Fabrication Assembly Total cost


department department ($/unit)
1 16.2
A 2 18.4
3 21.3
1 15.1
B 2 12.8
3 18.15
1 12.5
C 2 16.35
3 17.89
So the total monthly cost($) will be= 627060
(results from my plan)

4. Ans: Total production cost for the products that are transferred from fabrication department A to all the three assembly d
Total production cost for the products that are transferred from fabrication department B to all the three assembly d
Total production cost for the products that are transferred from fabrication department C to all the three assembly d

Since the total production cost in fabrication department is less than the other fabrication departments hence I wou

5. Ans: The following factors should be considered in determining such a shipping plan.

(a) Transportation cost


(b) Delivery of goods in time
(c ) Quality and condition of the goods
(d) Dependability and consistency of transportation service
(e) Shipping products to be insured
embly department 1 0
embly department 2 2000
embly department 3 10000

embly department 1 0
embly department 2 19000
embly department 3 0

embly department 1 5000


embly department 2 0
embly department 3 4000
ent A to all the three assembly departments ($) 249800
ent B to all the three assembly departments ($) 243200
ent C to all the three assembly departments ($) 134060

cation departments hence I would choose fabrication department C.

You might also like