Construction and Building Materials 16 (2002) 123–131

Effect of random inclusion of sisal fibre on strength behaviour of soil

J. Prabakara,*, R.S. Sridharb
a
Regional Research laboratory (CSIR), Bhopal, India
b
Coimbatore Institute of Technology, Coimbatore, India

Received 21 July 2000; received in revised form 23 July 2001; accepted 9 January 2002

Abstract

Construction of building and other civil engineering structures on weak or soft soil is highly risky on geo-technical grounds
because such soil is susceptible to differential settlements, poor shear strength and high compressibility. Improvement of load
bearing capacity of the soil may be undertaken by a variety of ground improvement techniques like stabilisation of soil, adoption
of reinforced earth technique etc. Reinforced earth technique is considered as an effective ground improvement method because
of its cost effectiveness, easy adaptability and reproducibility. Therefore, in the present investigation, sisal fibre has been chosen
as the reinforcement material and it was randomly included in to the soil at four different percentages of fibre content, i.e. 0.25,
0.5, 0.75 and 1% by weight of raw soil. Four different lengths of fibre, i.e. 10, 15, 20 and 25 mm are also considered as one of
the parameters of this study. The main objective of this investigation had been focused on the strength behaviour of the soil
reinforced with randomly included sisal fibre. The reinforced soil samples were subjected to compaction and triaxial compression
tests. The results of these tests have clearly shown a significant improvement in the failure deviator stress, Shear strength
parameters (C and f) of the studied soil. It can be concluded that sisal fibre can be considered as a good earth reinforcement
material. 䊚 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Sisal fibre; Reinforcement; Soil; Cohesion; Friction

1. Introduction same technique, random inclusion of various types of

fibres is also considered as a soil reinforcement material.
The concept of earth reinforcement is an ancient These fibres act to interlock particles and group of
technique and demonstrated abundantly in nature by particles in a unitary coherent matrix. This work inves-
animals, birds and the action of tree roots. Constructions tigates the use of sisal fibre for similar purpose.
using this techniques are known to have existed in the Soil mass reinforced with randomly distributed dis-
fifth and fourth millenniums BC w4x. This concept is crete fibres resembles the conventional earth reinforce-
used for the improvement of certain desired properties ment in many of its properties. The preparation is quite
of soil like bearing capacity, shear strength (C and f), similar to that of admixture stabilisation. Mostly the
permeability characteristics, etc. This concept and prin- discrete fibres are simply added and mixed with the
ciple was first developed by Vidal w7x by which he soil, much the same as cement, lime or any other
demonstrated that the introduction of reinforcing ele- additives.
ments in a soil mass increases the shear resistance of One of the main advantages of randomly distributed
the medium. Presently, the soil reinforcement technique fibres is the maintenance of strength isotropy and
is well established and is used in variety of applications absence of potential failure plane, that can develop
like improvement of bearing capacity, filter and drainage parallel to the oriented reinforcement w1x. Very limited
control, etc., conventional methods of reinforcement information has been reported on the use of randomly
consists of continuous inclusions of strips, fabrics, and distributed discrete fibres for soil reinforcement, e.g.
grids into an earth mass. But as a modification of the
some limited information available of the use of jute
*Corresponding author. Fax: q91-755-587042. and coir fibres w6x. Metal fibres, metal strips and
E-mail address: [email protected] (J. Prabakar). artificial fibres of polymer compound had been consid-

0950-0618/02/$ - see front matter 䊚 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 9 5 0 - 0 6 1 8 Ž 0 2 . 0 0 0 0 8 - 9
124 J. Prabakar, R.S. Sridhar / Construction and Building Materials 16 (2002) 123–131

Table 1 specific gravity and compaction behaviour are also

Engineering properties of soil used in the study studied besides the triaxial tests. This paper intended to
SL. Soil properties Values present the results of investigation to assess the useful-
no. (%) ness of sisal fibres as soil reinforcement material. It
mainly describes on effect of sisal fibre in soil, the
1. Specific gravity 2.71
compaction behaviour of soil, strength and deformation
2. Grain size analysis behaviour of such soil.
Gravel 0.0
Sand 6.38
Silt 78.48 2. Materials and experimental details
Clay 15.14
3. Consistency limit 2.1. Materials
Liquid limit 31.36
Plastic limit 17.47 For the present study, a C-f soil sample of wood
Plasticity index 14.09
brown colour was collected from Kasturiba Nagar on
4. I.S Classification CL Raisen Road, approximately 12 km from Bhopal railway
5. Compaction study 14.80 station. The soil sample was collected in polythene
Optimum moisture content 1.780 gycc gunny bags and then air-dried. Engineering properties
Maximum dry density of this soil are listed in Table 1. Sisal fibre used in this
6. Shear parameters study has been collected from Jagdalpur in Bastar Distt,
Cohesion 19 KNym2 of Madhya Pradesh. Special attention was given to
Angle of shearing resistance 90
select sisal fibre diversified from a single batch of sisal
crop of particular agricultural land in order to avoid
variations in the material properties. The sisal fibre was
ered useful as reinforcement material due to their uni- air dried to remove moisture from it. The physical and
form material properties and reproducibility. Only mechanical properties of the sisal fibre are presented in
recently, the natural fibres have tried in the field of soil Table 2. Untreated sisal fibres were used for experimen-
reinforcement w6x due to their affordable cost, strength, tal study.
friendly environmental nature and bulk availability. In
addition to these stated advantages it has some practical
2.2. Preparation of samples
drawbacks, such as reproducibility and biodegradability.
The problem of biodegradability can be effectively
overcome by applying chemical coatings on fibres using By conducting preliminary pilot experiments, four
polymer compounds. This is a proven solution for different lengths of fibre as 10, 15, 20 and 25 mm, were
biodegradability of natural fibres w5x. Though there are been chosen for this study. Each length of fibre was
plenty of natural materials available for being used a added to the soil at four different percentages, i.e. 0.25,
soil reinforcement material to improve certain engineer- 0.50, 0.75 and 1%. After 1%, the mixing of soil–fibre
ing properties of soil such as jute, coir, sisal, bamboo, was felt very difficult as the fibres are sticking together
wood, palm leaf, coconut leaf truck, coir dust, cotton to form lumps. This also caused pockets of low density.
and grass, etc., research workers are concentrating with So it has decided to stop with 1% fibre content. This
limited varieties of materials like bamboo, jute, and coir investigation reports the effect of (a) length and (b)
and other materials are presently left without consider- quantity of fibre on: (i) compaction; (ii) strength; (iii)
ation in the field of soil reinforcement. Out of these CBR; and (iv) swelling of the soil. Thus, 16 samples
unexperimented materials, sisal fibre has an attractive of soil specimens admixed with sisal were tested for
prospect of being used as a natural material for soil each of the above four properties. All the tests were
reinforcement in the forms of (a) simple fibres, (b) also extended to the unreinforced soil specimen as
geotextile, and (c) geosynthetics (after being given reference tests, to make comparison between the strength
chemical–thermal treatment).
Table 2
In order to understand completely the strength behav- Physical and mechanical properties of sisal fibre
iour of a non-expansive C-f soil randomly reinforced
with sisal fibre and also to assess the suitability of sisal SL. Properties Values
fibre as a reinforcement material, a series of experiments no.
were carried out on a non-expansive soil sample with 1. Unit weight 962 kgym3
different percentages of fibre inclusion. Undrained tri- 2. Specific gravity 0.962
axial tests are performed on sisal fibre reinforced soil to 3. Average diameter 0.25 mm
analyse the stress–strain behaviour of the innovative 4. Initial moisture loss 3.5%
5. Breaking tensile strength 286 Nymm2
material. Other important engineering properties like
 J. Prabakar, R.S. Sridhar / Construction and Building Materials 16 (2002) 123–131 125

Fig. 1. Effect of fibre length on maximum dry density of soil.

behaviour of unreinforced soil and to that of reinforced 125 8C when heated for 36 h. This implies that the
soil. results of water content tests were not affected by the
high temperature in the oven.
2.3. Testing programme
2.3.2. Undrained triaxial compression test
Soil reinforced with randomly included sisal fibre had The conventional undrained triaxial compression test
been taken as the prime sample material for the present was performed at a strain rate of 1.27 mmymin under
investigation, in order to predict its behaviour under the the confining pressures (s3) of 69, 138 and 207 kNy
influence of fibre inclusion. As a prerequisite, the m2. The remoulded soil specimens with and without
engineering and physical properties (specific gravity, reinforcement were prepared in standard mould at the
liquid limit, plastic limit, IS classification and shear optimum moisture content (14.8%) with maximum dry
strength parameters) of the particular soil selected for density (1.780 gycm3) using I.S. light compaction. The
this study were also determined in the laboratory accord- amount of fibre added was similar to that specified in
ing to the relevant I.S.-2720 w2x. The following tests Section 3.1. The cylindrical shaped triaxial test speci-
were performed for all the 17 (one unreinforced sample mens were obtained by driving sample extruder and
along with 16 fibre-reinforced samples) test samples. specimens were ejected out and trimmed off so that the
finished dimensions of the specimen being 38 mm in
2.3.1. Compaction test diameter and 76 mm in length. These specimens were
A compaction test was carried out adopting the I.S. tested in triaxial testing machine under undrained
light compaction method as specified in I.S. 2720 (Part condition.
VII) w3x. Each soil sample was prepared by initial dry
mixing of raw soil (3 kg) and corresponding quantity 3. Results and discussions
of fibre according to percentage (by weight of raw soil)
of fibre content. Then water was added and mixed again The effect of sisal fibre addition in soil on compaction
until the water spreads all over the soil. The dry and shows that the shape of the compaction curves are
wet mixing of soil–fiber–water was carried out in a similar to that of unreinforced sample. For all samples,
non-porous metal tray in order to avoid water loss. All the dry density increases with increase in water content
the 17 test samples were subjected to this test and up to the point of optimum moisture content beyond
respective optimum moisture content and maximum dry which increase in water content reduces the dry density.
density of all combinations were determined. Determi- The effect of fibre length on maximum dry density
nation of water content was carried out by the oven of soil is shown in Fig. 1. For any particular percentage
drying method. In this method there is a possibility of of fibre content, dry density decreases with increase in
sisal fibre being affected by high temperature. For this fibre length. Therefore, it implies that the maximum dry
purpose, ignition loss test was performed on the raw density of the soil is decreases with increase in fibre
sisal fibre and it was found that the loss of weight was length. Maximum dry density is recorded for 10-mm
only due to the evaporation of initial moisture content fibre included soil where it ranges from 1.775 to 1.760
present in it. Further, no ash was found produced nor gycm3, and maximum dry density is lowest in the case
the change of colour of sisal fibre at a temperature of of 25-mm fibre included soil where it ranges from 1.710
126 J. Prabakar, R.S. Sridhar / Construction and Building Materials 16 (2002) 123–131

Fig. 2. Effect of fibre content on maximum dry density of soil.

to 1.658 gycm3 in 25-mm density included soil, as it ordinary soil, and a further increase in fibre content
reduced the maximum dry density by 6.85% to that of reduced the OMC. But in all cases, the OMC is greater
the unreinforced soil. than that of raw soil. Addition of 1% fibre (25 mm)
caused a reduction of 16.67% in OMC. The effect of
3.1. Effect of fibre length of OMC fibre content on OMC is presented in Fig. 4.

Addition of 10-mm fibre has led to an increase in 3.4. Influence of fibre inclusion on shear strength
OMC compared to that of raw soil. A further increase parameters
in fibre length causes a decrease in the OMC. The
maximum OMC (19.2%) is recorded for 10-mm fibre Both the length of fibre and percentage of fibre
length at 0.25% fibre content, and the lowest OMC in content played an important role in the development of
the case of 25-mm fibre of 1% fibre content. Fig. 3 shear strength parameters C and f of the fibre reinforced
shows the relationship between fibre length and OMC. soil. Table 3 shows the values of cohesion (C) mobilised
The decrease in OMC by increasing fibre content may and angle of internal friction (f) of the reinforced soil.
be due to the presence of water content in sisal fibre. It is observed that by increase in fibre content, the value
This may be the reason for the initial increase in OMC of cohesion increases, but beyond 0.75% reinforcement
when fibre is included in the soil. the cohesion value drastically reduced. The maximum
value of cohesion observed in 0.75% reinforcement the
3.2. Effect of fibre content on maximum dry density cohesion value drastically reduced. The maximum value
of cohesion observed in 0.75% fibre content of 20-mm
The effect of fibre content on maximum dry density fibre as 66 kPa, which is 3.67 times more than that of
is presented in Fig. 2. For any particular fibre length, unreinforced soil. The lowest value of cohesion is in the
an increase in fibre content causes a reduction in dry case of 10-mm fibre at 1% fibre content where it is 28
density. As already explained this is due reduction of kPa, which is 1.56 times more than that of raw soil.
average unit weight of the solids in the soil fibre mixture. The influence of fibre length on the cohesion value also
It is observed from Figs. 1 and 3 that the plot of significant as the length increases. The cohesion mobi-
variation of dry density with respect to fibre length as lised by the fibre is maximum when the length of the
well as fibre content, is more or less parallel. fibre is 20 mm. Of course there is no much variation in
the fraction angle as it ranges from 50 to 10, and the
3.3. Effect of fibre content on OMC variation is not in the systematic order. Beyond 25-mm
fibre length reinforcement, the friction angle remains
The OMC is decreased with increase in fibre content. the same at 58. It is generally agreed that reinforcement
The maximum OMC is recorded as 19.2% for 0.25% does not have a significant influence on the improvement
fibre content, and as low as 16% for soil with 1% of of angle of shearing resistance. The increase in the
25-mm fibre. The initial inclusion of fibre at 0.25% cohesion of soil–fibre matrix may due to the increase
caused a sudden hike in the OMC than that of the in the confining pressure due to the development of
 J. Prabakar, R.S. Sridhar / Construction and Building Materials 16 (2002) 123–131 127

Fig. 3. The relationship between the fibre length and the OMC.

tension in the fibre and the moisture in the fibre helps age of fibre and length of fibre are presented in Figs. 5
to form absorbed water layer to the clay particles, which and 6.
enables the reinforced soil to act as single coherent The stress–strain relationship of unreinforced soil and
matrix of soil fibre mass. soil reinforced with sisal fibre are drawn. Patterns of
The variation of cohesion with percentage of fibre stress–strain curves for all reinforced samples indicates
content is linear. Though the cohesion value is increased improvement in the deviator stress while fibre is includ-
with increase in fibre content, the amount of increase is ed in different proportion in different lengths. Deviator
quite less for the same percentage of fibre content of stress of fibre included soil also increased with increase
different lengths. The variation of friction angle with in confining pressure (s3). Failure deviator stresses of
fibre content shows a non-linear variation. In general, unreinforced soil are 68.37, 97.93 and 117.02 kNym2
the angle of internal friction increased with increase in corresponding to the confining pressures of 69, 138 and
fibre content up to 0.75% fibre content and then reduced. 207 kNym2, respectively. The maximum failure stresses
The maximum value of f obtained is 108 and smallest are recorded for soil reinforced with 0.75% of 20-mm
value being 58. The variation of cohesion with percent- fibre as 222.21, 220.89 and 261.65 kNym2 correspond-

Fig. 4. Effect of fibre content on OMC.

128 J. Prabakar, R.S. Sridhar / Construction and Building Materials 16 (2002) 123–131

Table 3 ing to the confining pressures of 69, 138 and 207 kNy
Shear parameters of the reinforced soil m2, respectively. Except for soil reinforced with 25-mm
SI. Fibre Fibre Cohesion Angle of length fibres, the failure stress keeps on improving, but
no. length content (kPa) internal for 25-mm fibre included soil the failure stress reduced
(mm) (%) friction even less than that of unreinforced soil. The variation
(degrees) of f with fibre content and length of fibre is presented
1. 0 0 18 9 in Figs. 7 and 8.
2. 10 0.25 36 7 To express the results in terms of a dimensionless
3. 10 0.50 56 6 quantity, a parameter ‘strength ratio (R f )’, which is
4. 10 0.75 62 9
5. 10 1.00 28 7 defined as the ratio of the shear strength of reinforced
6. 15 0.25 38 6.5 soil to the shear strength of unreinforced soil has been
7. 15 0.50 58 6 selected, i.e. mathematically.
8. 15 0.75 62 8.5
9. 15 1.00 38 6 RfsŽs1ys3.r Reinforced soilyŽs1
10. 20 0.25 40 7
11. 20 0.50 54 8
ys3.r Unreinforced soil
12. 20 0.75 66 10
13. 20 1.00 40 7
The values of failure stress observed at 10% strain
14. 25 0.25 39 5.5 level and strength ratio of soil are presented in the Table
15. 25 0.50 60 5 4. The failure strain adopted in this test for the calcu-
16. 25 0.75 64 5 lation of peak deviator stress was 10% though the
17. 25 1.00 35 5 literature recommend 20% is practically not advisable
for soils under application of loads and therefore decided

Fig. 5. Variation of cohesion with length of fibre.

Fig. 6. Variation of cohesion with fibre content.

 J. Prabakar, R.S. Sridhar / Construction and Building Materials 16 (2002) 123–131 129

Fig. 7. Variation of p with length of fibre.

to restrict the failure strain at 10% level. The strength ment in the deviator stress of fibre reinforced soil. For
ratio decreases with increases in confining pressure. a specific length of fibre and confining pressure (s1),
deviator stress increased with increase in fibre content.
3.5. Effect of fibre length on deviator stress This is continues up to 0.75% fibre content beyond
Effect of length has significant influence on the shear which the deviator stress decreases. For all lengths of
strength of samples. For a specific percentage of fibre fibre, the peak strength ration occurs at 0.75% fibre
content and confining pressure, introduction of sisal inclusion. The maximum strength ratio is obtained as
fibre improves the deviator stress. This improvement 3.250, while the soil was reinforced with 0.75% of 20-
keeps on increasing with increase in fibre length up to mm fibre. This shows an increase of 325% in strength
20 mm. Beyond 20 mm, a further increase in fibre ratio over unreinforced soil. At 1% fibre inclusion of
length caused a reduction in the deviator stress. 25-mm fibre in the confining pressures 138 and 207
Increased length of fibre reduces the soil–fibre inter- kPa, the shear strength is less than that of unreinforced
locking, which may be the reason for the reduction in soil. Increase in fibre content beyond 0.75%, reduces
deviator stress when the fibre length is increased after the soil particles and therefore resulted in less mobilis-
20 mm. Inclusion of 20-mm fibre at 0.75%, recorded ation of cohesion. This may be the reason for the
the maximum deviator stress as 261.65 kPa when the reduction of deviator stress after 0.75% fibre content.
confining pressure is 2.7 kPa and maximum strength
ration as 3.250, when the confining pressure is 69 kPa. 4. Conclusions
3.6. Effect of fibre content on deviator stress
Based on the experiments conducted to study the
Percentage of fibre content included in to the soil as influence of sisal fibre inclusion on the strength behav-
reinforcements plays a significant role on the improve- iour of soil under various tests conditions, the following

Fig. 8. Variation of p with length of fibre.

130 J. Prabakar, R.S. Sridhar / Construction and Building Materials 16 (2002) 123–131

Table 4
Failure deviator stress and strength ratio of reinforced soil

SI. Fibre Fibre Failure stress (kPa) Strength ratio

no. length content
(mm) (%)

1. 0 0 68.37 97.93 117.02 1.000 1.000 1.000

2. 10 0.25 103.99 122.12 142.30 1.521 1.247 1.216
3. 10 0.50 134.48 144.25 164.06 1.967 1.473 1.402
4. 10 0.75 166.41 195.08 221.87 2.434 1.992 1.896
5. 10 1.00 81.52 90.72 107.82 1.192 0.926 0.921
6. 15 0.25 106.79 133.57 146.33 1.562 1.364 1.250
7. 15 0.50 141.59 146.21 164.65 2.071 1.493 1.407
8. 15 0.75 182.55 200.56 224.91 2.670 2.048 1.922
9. 15 1.00 90.45 113.21 123.75 1.323 1.156 1.058
10. 20 0.25 114.39 118.35 151.20 1.673 1.209 1.292
11. 20 0.50 142.00 174.87 155.15 2.076 1.786 1.326
12. 20 0.75 222.21 220.89 261.65 3.250 2.256 2.236
13. 20 1.00 99.93 144.63 135.43 1.462 1.477 1.157
14. 25 0.25 97.50 110.47 124.28 1.426 1.128 1.062
15. 25 0.50 137.42 142.39 150.49 2.010 1.454 1.286
16. 25 0.75 150.88 157.86 165.27 2.207 1.612 1.412
17. 25 1.00 77.71 90.80 95.48 1.137 0.927 0.816
s3 69 138 207 69 138 207
(kPa)

conclusions are made. When the soil is reinforced with is linear. There is no specific trend in the variation of
the sisal fibre, it reduces the dry density of the soil due friction angle with length of fibre. Up to 0.75% fibre
to a low specific gravity and unit weight of sisal fibre. content, the cohesion is said to be improved linearly
The maximum dry density of reinforced soil ranges from with increase in the fibre content. But for the same fibre
1.775 to 1.698 gycm3. The increase in the fibre length content of different length of fibre, the amount of
and fibre content also reduces the dry density of the increase of cohesion is quite less.
soil. The variation is linear for both cases. Initial The non-linear variation of f with percentage of fibre
introduction of fibre in to the soil causes an increase in content leads to a conclusion that the behaviour of the
OMC, and a further increase in both length and fibre fibre included soil may be non-linear in high stress
content reduce OMC. The OMC range of reinforced soil regions.
is between 19.2 and 16.0%.
The shear stress of fibre reinforced soil is improved References
due to the addition of the sisal fibre. The shear stress is
increased non-linearly with increase in length of fibre w1x Chakraborty TK, Dasgupta SP. Randomly reinforced fly ash as
up to 20 mm and beyond, where an increase in length foundation material. Proceedings of the Indian Geotechnical
reduces the shear stress. The increase in the length of Conference igc96. Madras, India, 1996:231–235.
w2x I.S. 2720 (Part I). Indian standard for preparation of dry soil
fibre fails to interlock the soil particles and therefore,
samples for various tests. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Stan-
soil–fibre particles do not act as a single coherent dards publications, 1983.
matrix. The shear stress of reinforced soil is also w3x I.S. 2720 (Part VII). Indian standard for determination of water
increased with increase in confining pressure (s3). The content—dry density relationship using light compaction. New
percentage of fibre content also influences the shear Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards publications, 1980.
strength as the shear stress improves non-linearly with w4x Jones CJFP. Earth reinforcement and soil structure. Butter-
increase in fibre content. But beyond 0.75% fibre con- worths advanced series in geotechnical engineering. 1985.
w5x Khazanchi AC, Saxena M, Rao TC. Material science of natural
tent, the shear stress reduces with increase in fibre organic fibers reinforced composites in polymer–cement–mud
content. When the percentage of fibre content is matrix for construction engineering. Proceedings of Interna-
increased, the density of the soil fibre mass is reduced tional Conference on Textile Composites in Building Construc-
and thus may be the reason for this reduction. tion, Part 1. Pluralis, France, 1990:69–76.
The value of cohesion is increased due to the inclusion w6x Mandal JN, Murti MVR. Potential for use of natural fibers in
geotextile engineering. Proceedings of the International Work-
of sisal fibre. The maximum value of cohesion is
shop on Geotextiles. Bangalore, India, 1989:251–254.
obtained as 66 kPa as against 18 kPa of unreinforced w7x Vidal H. The principle of reinforced earth. Highway research
soil. Up to 20-mm length, the increase in the length of record no. 282. Highway research record no. 282. 1969. p. 1 –
fibre increases the value of cohesion and this variation 16.
 J. Prabakar, R.S. Sridhar / Construction and Building Materials 16 (2002) 123–131 131

Further reading Mandal JN, Manjunath VR. Bearing capacity of strip footing resting
on reinforced sand subgrades. J Constr Build Mater 1995;9(1):35 –
8.
Akinmusura JO, Akinbolade JA. Stability of loaded footings on
Narayana swamy Shetty KR, Chandrashekar M. Behavior of fiber
reinforced soil. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 1981;107(6):819 –27.
reinforced lateritic soil under circular footing. Proceedings of the
Andersland OB, Khattak AS. Shear strength of kaoliniteyfiber soil
First Indian Geotextiles Conference on Reinforced Soil. Bombay,
mixtures. Proceedings of the International Conference on Soil
India, 1988:C41–C46.
Reinforcement. Paris, France, 1979:11–16.
Pandey SN, Majumdar AK. Manufacturing, testing and application
Binquet J, Lee KL. Bearing capacity tests on reinforced earth slabs.
of jute as geotextiles. Proceedings of the International Workshop
J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 1975;101(12):1241 –55.
on Geotextiles. Bangalore, India, 1989:240–246.
Garg KG, Saranswami A. Behavior of reinforced sand samples in
triaxial shear. Proceedings of Indian Geotechnical Conference Punmia BC. Text book of soil mechanics and foundation engineering,
igc91. Surat, India, 1991:359–361. 13th ed. New Delhi, India: Lakshmi Publications, 1994.
Gray DM, Ohashi H. Mechanics of fiber reinforcement in sand. J Radhakrishnan Nair V. Manufacturing, testing and application of coir
Geotech Eng Div ASCE 1983;109(3):819 –27. as geotextiles with particular reference to erosion control. Proceed-
Hore DJ. Laboratory study of granular soils reinforced with randomly ings of the International Workshop on Geotextiles. Bangalore,
oriented descrete fibre. Proceedings of the International Conference India, 1989:237–239.
on Use of Fabrics in Geotechnical Engineering. Paris, France, Ramanatha Ayyar TS, Joseph J, Beena KS. Bearing capacity of sand
1977:47–52. reinforced with coir rope. Proceedings of the First Indian Geotex-
Hota S, Dash PK. Load carrying capacity of strip footing on vertical tiles Conference on Reinforced Soil. Bombay, India, 1988:A11–
metal sheet reinforced sand bed. Proceedings of the Indian Geo- A16.
technical Conference igc91. Surat, India, 1991:341–343. Ramanatha Ayyar TS, Krishnaswamy NR, Viswanadhan BVS. Geo-
I.S. 2720 (Part IIIySec. 1). Indian standard for determination of synthetics for foundation on a swelling clay. Proceedings of the
specific gravity (fine grained soil). New Delhi: Bureau of Indian International Workshop on Geotextiles. Bangalore, India,
Standards publications, 1980. 1989:176–180.
I.S. 2720 (Part IIIySec. 2). Indian standard for determination of Shankariah B, Narahari R. Bearing capacity of reinforced sand beds.
specific gravity (fine, medium and coarse grained soils). New Proceedings of the First Indian Geotextiles Conference on Rein-
Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards publications, 1980. forced Soil. Bombay, India, 1988:C9–C14.
I.S. 2720 (Part IV). Indian standard for grain size analysis. New Subramaniyam, MS, Bujang bin kim Haut A, Md. Ariff bin Md.
Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards publications, 1975. Thayoob A. Bearing capacity of footings on reinforced earth.
I.S. 2720 (Part XVI). Indian standard for laboratory determination of Proceedings of the International Symposium on Strides in Civil
CBR. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards publications, 1965. Engineering ‘93. Madras, India, 1993:SO63–SO68.
Khanna SK, Justo CEG. Highway engineering, 7th ed. Roorkee, Suresh A. Strength and deformation behavior of fabric reinforced
India: Nemchand & Brothers publications, 1993. earth. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Strides in
Krisnaswamy NR, Srinivaulu Reddy N. Behavior of reinforced earth Civil Engineering ‘93. Madras, India. 1993:SO47–SO50.
under triaxial compression. Proceedings of the First Indian Geotex- Tripathy UC, Dash PK, Patra CR. The behavior of square fottings on
tiles Conference on Reinforced Soil. Bombay, India, 1988:A41– sand bed reinforced with perforated geotextiles. Proceedings of the
A46. Indian Geotechnical Conference igc92. Calcutta, India, 1992:243–
Krisnaswamy NR, Raghavendra HB. Behavior of reinforced earth 245.
under direct shear test. Proceedings of the First Indian Geotextiles Venkatappa Rao G, Sunil Gupta A. Geotextiles reinforced clay.
Conference on Reinforced Soil. Bombay, India, 1988:C47–C52. Proceedings of the Indian Geotechnical Conference igc92. Cal-
Mandal JN, Divshikar DG. Large scale shear box tests with inclined cutta, India, 1992:261–264.
reinforcement. Proceedings of the First Indian Geotextiles Confer- Venkatappa Rao G, Kate JM, Faisal shamsher A. Strength behavior
ence on Reinforced Soil. Bombay, India, 1988:C73–C77. of geotextile reinforced sand under axisymmetric loading. J Indian
Mandal JN, Viswamohan A. Performance studies on California Geotech Eng 1996;26(2):175 –99.
bearing ratio values using geosynthetics. Proceedings of the Inter- Yang Z. Strength and deformation characteristics of reinforced sand.
national Workshop on Geotextiles. Bangalore, India, 1989:255– Ph.D. thesis submitted to the University of California, Los Angeles,
258. USA, 1972.