The document discusses the lack of understanding about what drives coffee quality and how to properly measure it. While specialty coffee is a major market, little scientific research has been done on cup quality. Some factors like altitude and variety are known to impact taste, but methods for sensory and laboratory evaluation of quality are inconsistent. With better research on genetics, agronomy, processing and storage, there is huge potential to differentiate coffee quality similarly to the wine industry and take it to new levels.
The document discusses the lack of understanding about what drives coffee quality and how to properly measure it. While specialty coffee is a major market, little scientific research has been done on cup quality. Some factors like altitude and variety are known to impact taste, but methods for sensory and laboratory evaluation of quality are inconsistent. With better research on genetics, agronomy, processing and storage, there is huge potential to differentiate coffee quality similarly to the wine industry and take it to new levels.
The document discusses the lack of understanding about what drives coffee quality and how to properly measure it. While specialty coffee is a major market, little scientific research has been done on cup quality. Some factors like altitude and variety are known to impact taste, but methods for sensory and laboratory evaluation of quality are inconsistent. With better research on genetics, agronomy, processing and storage, there is huge potential to differentiate coffee quality similarly to the wine industry and take it to new levels.
The document discusses the lack of understanding about what drives coffee quality and how to properly measure it. While specialty coffee is a major market, little scientific research has been done on cup quality. Some factors like altitude and variety are known to impact taste, but methods for sensory and laboratory evaluation of quality are inconsistent. With better research on genetics, agronomy, processing and storage, there is huge potential to differentiate coffee quality similarly to the wine industry and take it to new levels.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 16
Insufficient understanding
of the mechanisms affecting quality coffee and measuring quality
Turning coffee into wine
The flow Expose the paradigm Describe what we know about cup quality Give you cup quality literature review draft Explain why the paradigm exists Discuss the need for better cup quality evaluation methods Discuss potential for huge cup quality improvements Explain why and how coffee will become the new ‘wine’ Specialty coffee and coffee science disconnect Coffee Cup Quality
The main specialty coffee market
driver The Paradigm
Despite the market’s ‘value’, precious
little is known about coffee cup quality – And even less in the public domain What do we really know?
There is variability for coffee cup quality
– Coffees do taste different High altitude coffee tastes different than low altitude coffee Some varieties give different cup characteristics The country and region seem to influence the cup The digestive tracts of cats don’t seem to add any value to the cup Etc. etc....zzzzzzz Coffee quality research literature review Based on searching global scientific databases over time and space for research that has something/anything to do with...
Coffee Cup Quality
Why the extreme paucity ? Young industry: 15-20 years old Coffee cup quality variability exists at ORIGIN – Once the bean has been picked...not much left Origin research has mainly focused on yield and disease resistance improvement...not cup quality Most origin research infrastructures and capacities are challenged with a lack of necessary human and budgetary resources Coffee consuming countries have disparate specialty industries: not organized Coffee Cup Quality Evaluation “If you’re going to improve it, you got to be able to measure it”
Sensory Bio-tech lab
SCAA method NIRS
CoE method GC ICO standards Lab measurements of “Q” method known ‘quality’ precursor Consumer panels compounds – Chlorogenic acid Expert panels – Citric acid Hundreds of ‘secret – pH and/or private methods’ – Sucrose The problem Current sensory methods are too variable to use for scientific purposes Current hi-tech methods are not well correlated to sensory methods Can we really improve coffee cup quality and take to the level of the wine industry’s level of differentiation? The Geisha-Esmeralda Story is just one confirmation The Geisha-Esmeralda Story Ethiopian land race growing as an accession in an arabica genetic collection Picked up by a curious producer who takes it to Panama, multiplies it and grows it out One day, somebody separates it from the others and tastes it It blows the sensory evaluation scores off the chart Exploiting natural genetic variability
The Geisha is just ONE of thousands of land
races that are out there Possibilities in cup quality differentiation are almost limitless The potential to push the quality envelope beyond our wildest dreams is REAL In addition to genetic variability... Agronomy: effects of fertilizers, spacing, exposure, pruning, mulching, etc.... Processing: effect of pulping methods, soaking, strains of yeast in fermentation... Storage: effects of packaging materials, coffee seed research, gas treatments, shelf life work... Roasting and brewing research Summary