Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1K views

    Validation Instrument

    Uploaded by

    Robert Delos Santos Zarate
    The document contains two appendices from Pangasinan State University regarding the validation of a research instrument. Appendix D includes a questionnaire that experts were asked to complete, rating how valid they found each item and criteria of the instrument. Appendix E displays the results, showing the mean rating for each item across five experts. Based on the scale provided, the instrument was found to be highly valid overall, expected to provide unbiased data allowing for 8-10% error.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Validation Instrument

    Uploaded by

    Robert Delos Santos Zarate
    1K views4 pages
    The document contains two appendices from Pangasinan State University regarding the validation of a research instrument. Appendix D includes a questionnaire that experts were asked to complete, rating how valid they found each item and criteria of the instrument. Appendix E displays the results, showing the mean rating for each item across five experts. Based on the scale provided, the instrument was found to be highly valid overall, expected to provide unbiased data allowing for 8-10% error.

    Original Description:

    Thesis

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document contains two appendices from Pangasinan State University regarding the validation of a research instrument. Appendix D includes a questionnaire that experts were asked to complete, rating how valid they found each item and criteria of the instrument. Appendix E displays the results, showing the mean rating for each item across five experts. Based on the scale provided, the instrument was found to be highly valid overall, expected to provide unbiased data allowing for 8-10% error.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    1K views4 pages

    Validation Instrument

    Uploaded by

    Robert Delos Santos Zarate
    The document contains two appendices from Pangasinan State University regarding the validation of a research instrument. Appendix D includes a questionnaire that experts were asked to complete, rating how valid they found each item and criteria of the instrument. Appendix E displays the results, showing the mean rating for each item across five experts. Based on the scale provided, the instrument was found to be highly valid overall, expected to provide unbiased data allowing for 8-10% error.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 4

    Appendix D

    Questionnaire Establishing the Content Validity of the Research


    Instrument

    Republic of the Philippines


    PANGASINAN STATE UNIVERSITY
    OPEN UNIVERSITY SYSTEMS
    Lingayen, Pangasinan

    Questionnaire Establishing the Content Validity of the Instrument

    Name of Evaluator (optional):_________________________________________


    Position / Academic Rank: ___________________________________________
    Field of Specialization: ______________________________________________
    Higher Education Institution: _________________________________________
    Location: _________________________________________________________
    Date: ____________________________________________________________

    Direction: This tool asks for your evaluation of the questionnaire to be used in
    the data gathering for the investigation stated above, to establish its validity. You
    are requested to give your honest assessment using the criteria stated below;
    please check only one from the selection.

    Scale Interpretation Description


    The questionnaire is valid and can provide
    5 Very Highly Valid unbiased data for the investigation, allowing 0-5
    % error.
    The questionnaire is valid and can provide
    4 Highly Valid unbiased data for the investigation, allowing 8-10
    % error.
    The questionnaire is valid and can provide
    3 Valid unbiased data for the investigation, allowing 11-
    15 % error.
    The questionnaire is valid and can provide
    2 Less Valid unbiased data for the investigation, allowing 16-
    20% error.
    The questionnaire is valid and can provide
    1 Not Valid at All unbiased data for the investigation, allowing 21-
    25 % error.
    Validators’ Questionnaire Assessment

    Rating
    Criteria
    5 4 3 2 1
    Item Content Analysis
    1. The items are focused on a single problem.
    2. The items meet the specified Mathematical skills.
    3. Over specific knowledge is avoided.
    4. The items emphasize higher level of thinking.
    5. The item is not based on opinion.
    Problem Solving Performance Test Analysis
    6. The directions are clearly stated and that wording
    lets the examinee know exactly what is being asked.
    7. The problems are clearly stated and logical.
    8. The problems are neither too easy nor too difficult.
    9. The problems has the capability to measure the
    different Mathematical skills within a given timeframe.
    10. The number of problems presented are enough for
    the understanding of Grade 10 students.
    11. The problems included in the test are relevant to the
    needs of the students.
    12. The problems provided are adequate coverage of
    the topics in the syllabus.
    Overall Test Content Analysis
    13. The test measures the Mathematical skills acquired
    by Grade 10 students.
    14. The test is comprehensive enough for the purpose
    of the study.
    15. The language level used is appropriate for the
    students.
    16. The level of difficulty is appropriate for the students.

    Comments and Suggestions:


    ____________________________________________________________________
    ____________________________________________________________________
    __________________________________________________________________

    ______________________________________
    Signature over Printed Name of the Validator
    Appendix E
    The Results of the Instrument Validation by the Experts

    Republic of the Philippines


    PANGASINAN STATE UNIVERSITY
    OPEN UNIVERSITY SYSTEMS
    Lingayen

    The Results of the Instrument Validation by the Experts

    Item No. Expert Expert Expert Expert Expert


    Mean
    1 2 3 4 5
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    12
    13
    14
    15
    16

    Average Mean

    Scale Interpretation Description


    The questionnaire is valid and can
    4.21 -5.00 Very Highly Valid provide unbiased data for the
    investigation, allowing 0-5 % error.
    The questionnaire is valid and can
    3.41 -4.20 Highly Valid provide unbiased data for the
    investigation, allowing 8-10 % error.
    The questionnaire is valid and can
    2.61 -3.40 Valid provide unbiased data for the
    investigation, allowing 11-15 % error.
    The questionnaire is valid and can
    1.81 -2.60 Less Valid provide unbiased data for the
    investigation, allowing 16-20% error.
    The questionnaire is valid and can
    1.00 -1.80 Not Valid at All provide unbiased data for the
    investigation, allowing 21-25 % error.

    You might also like