10.chapter 10 O TPM PDF
10.chapter 10 O TPM PDF
10.chapter 10 O TPM PDF
10
O-TPM
N.V.Rajelli
11.01.2012
BACKGROUND O-TPM
High
Management
Loss
High
More vehicle Procurement
Turn around Cost
Time
High
Office Processing
Time
• Leader- N.V.RAJELLI • Leader- S.L.KADU • Leader- S.A.SHASTRI • Leader- S.D.DAWALKAR • Leader- P.D.SIRSALKAR • Leader- S.R.NAIR
6 TPM Circles
D) Pioneering 2.Customer 2.1. Prevention of rejection 2.1.1) Implementation of TPM activities at Vendor
Technology complaint due to Vendor parts end
reduction - 2.2. Prevent Transit damage 2.1.2) Number of self certified vendors.
Zero of finished parts . 2.2.1) Number of improved packing.
3.1.1) Material scheduling by MRP system.
3.1.Reduction of Raw material
3.Decrease 3.2.1) Number of cost negotiations
Inventory & Finished
cost 3.2.2) Number of cheaper alternatives
Goods
– 20 %Down 3.2.Cost saving activities 3.2.3) Number of alternative sources.
Availability of electricity
Relocation of sitting
arrangement
Reduction of searching
time
Reduction in vehicle turn
around time.
Vendor up gradation by
TPM way
Improvements in packing
standards
Cheaper alternatives,
group orders, VA/VE
Material handling
improvements
OBJECTIVE
Elimination of Management losses, Focus on improvement to
reduce the cost for achieve best ‘O - TPM’ management.
TARGETS O-TPM
Sr. Mfg. Office Bench Mark Target
Factor Parameter UOM
No Side Side (2009-10) (Mar-12)
P Total 28540 0
Production Loss due to shortage of Mins
2 12184 0
Man-power. /Month
Hours
3 Processing Time Loss 429 100
/Month
4 Occur
Inward Material & parts rejection 12 0
/Month
Q Handling defect during internal Qty.
5 150 0
material movement. /Month
Value Lacs
6 Purchasing cost Reduction 101 80
/Month
Nos /Man /
M 11 Kaizen / Man/ Month Month. 1 2
Q4
Q4
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q3
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q4
Q1
Q1
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q2
Q2
Q3
Q4
Formation of ‘O-TPM’
1 Committee and
Chairman
List of Department
3
Wise Activity
Department Wise Loss
4
Identification
5 Target Setting
Reduce Losses By
6
Kaizen Way
Horizontal Deployment
7
Of Kaizen
Sustenance of 1S,2S
8
Activity
No arrangement for More space for material Vertical space usage for
Systematic material arrangement
Systematic material storage storage Material storage
MANAGEMENT LOSS
56044 Plant
52000 Total Management
Loss In Minutes
42000 Loss
32000 26760 24484
22000 Shop wise Loss
12000 4800
2000
7) op C p
-0 D ho
6 Sh BM –09-10 LP S
-(0 ne in
t
B
M
chi Pa
a
M
Loss in
Loss in Minutes Loss in Minutes
Sr.No. Details Minutes Paint
Machine shop LPDC
shop
Sub Contracting
2 3500 2240 1200
Parts
Additional
Source Supplier
Less Capacity Transportation
delay
KK Pillar PM Pillar
Alternate Source Long distance
Supplier supplier
•Provision of conveyors •Provision Express
feeder line for
Local Ware- •Provision of flow racks continuous electrical
House supply.
•Provision of Trolleys
•Provision of Bins
0
Why 5 : Single Source 0
Before(June-10) After (Aug-11)
30000 6
2 65
0
76 40
0
BM
30
93%
27500 2 4
Loss in Minutes
25000 2
22500
20000 81
0 MANAGEMENT LOSS IS REDUCED BY
17500 16
15000
30 Target A) MACHINE SHOP - 93 %
12500 98 4 0
10 80 0 Zero
10000 73 72 68
2 80 0 8 6 0
7500 46 42 384 364 5 0
5000
0
34 25 80
1
B) LPDC SHOP - 89 %
2500 0
0
C) PAINT SHOP - 90 %
1
12
1
11
1
1
10
11
11
1
11
11
)
1
09
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
r-
9-
0/
0/
0/
0/
n.
ug
ec
ov
ly
ep
pr
ay
ct
8-
Ma
'Ju
'0
'J u
-1
-1
-1
-1
'O
'A
'D
'N
'S
'A
'M
(0
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
et
M.
rg
B.
Ta
PPC
Supplier produces
Communicate
material as per plan
Communicate plan to
Monthly / weekly Purchase supplier
Suppliers
Production plan
System based re order Material Receipt as
Stores Payment
Requirement Material issue
Disbursement
Communication as per plan
Production
Daily / hourly Finished goods
Production plan
Dispatch Accounts
Invoice Copy
Finished goods
Customer
Payment receipt
Information Input Output
Vehicle waiting
Manual activity To Auto More P.O. More GRN
Processing Clearance
Change Method activity activity(86 Hrs) (49 Hrs)
Individual to De centralized
Counting time Reduction open p.o. To Centralize
activity
250 240
200
Mins / 150
Trip
120
9 Kaizens
100
50
implemented
0
Before After
0
300 29 Shop
24
0 BM Floor
250
59%
Time in Hours
0
19 0 0
200 18 18 5
16
0 5
14 13 5 0 0 0 0 0
150 12 12 12 12 12 12
0
10
100
BM – 2009-10
50
ACTUAL STATUS
0) 11 11 11 11 11 y 11 n 11 y 11 g 11 t1
1 1 1 1
t 1 ov 1 ec 1 ar 12
( 09- 1 010- 010- 010- 010- 'Apr a Ju ul u ep 'Oc N D
. 2 2 2 2 'M ' 'J 'A 'S ' ' tM
B.M Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 arge TARGET
T
BM(09-
Parameter. Apr. 11 May.11 Jun.11 July.11 Aug.11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11
10)
Turn around
290 165 140 135 125 120 120 120 120 120
time ( Mins )
Trips / Day 49 59 71 72 80 82 83 84 84 84
Sales Qty /
594810 671066 821742 844214 894912 944727 946762 948650 952015 956288
Month
VEHICLE TURN AROUND TIME ( MINS / TRIP ) INCREASE IN VEHICLE AVAILABILITY TRIPS / DAY
BM 60 % BM
90
84
84
84
0
83
90
82
29
80
300 1.7 Times
72
80
71
250
Trips / Day
Min / Trip
70
59
5
16
200
0
60
5
14
5
13
49
12
12
12
12
12
12
150 50
0
10
100 40
50 30
) ) 11 y 1 1 n 11 y 1 1 g 11 11 11 11 11 12
1 1
-10 pr 1 ay 1 un 1
1 11 11 11 t 11 11 11 12 -10 r l pt 'Oct Nov Dec ar
(0 9
' A M 'J Jul y 'Aug Sept 'Oc 'Nov 'Dec t M ar (09 'Ap 'Ma ' Ju ' J u 'Au
'S e ' ' et
M
BM
' ' ' e BM rg
rg Ta
Ta
,India
Horizontal Deployment For Alternative Source Horizontal Deployment For Group Buying
Sr. Item Description Existing Source Alternate Source Benefit Sr. Item Description Month Source Benefit
No Yearly Saving No Yearly Saving
1 PSSC Drill Rajesh Sales Anand Techno Rs. 1 Lacs. 1 Water Glycol Apr-10 Hardcastle Rs. 0.25 Lacs
Dia.5mm
2 PCD Reamer Apr-10 KJK Poly Diamond Rs. 1 Lacs
2 D Type Heater Rathi Trading Power Heat Rs. 1 Lacs.
Enterprises 3 Silicon Carbide Heater May-10 S.S. Enterprises Rs. 0.05 Lacs
3 Coverall 88 Foseco Acme Foundary Rs. 0.9 Lacs
Foundary
BM
Amount in Lacs / Month
110
55
20 %
0.
10
100
1
.4
8
.9
92
4
.5
90
1
.1
89
1
88
.7
1
.2
90 85
84
4
.4
.2
.5
82
.2
81
81
81
80
80
80
80
80
70
STEP-4
APPROACH – INVENTORY REDUCTION O-TPM
Inventory Reduction
Direct Indirect
Material Material
( 8 days) ( 2 days)
BM 49.5% BM 34 % BM 85 %
5
8
7
9
6
3.
5
4
3.
3.
4
4
3.
8
2. 8
3.
2.25
87
3.
4 4
1.
1
92
2. 4
1
83 2
82
Number Of Days
Number Of Days
Number Of Days
79
75
9
65
3.
6
63
3.
8
2.
2 1.
35
34
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
3
2.
23
2. 9
2.
16
1.75
2.
2.
3
2
3
08
1
2.
2 2
1.
2.
1.5
0
2.
2.
1.25 8
0.
2 8
2 1 5
0. 8 5 3 4
4 .3 3 .3 .3 2 .3 1 .3 1 .2 9
0. 0 0. 0
1 0.75
0.5 0 0 0 0 2
1 0.
0 0.25
0
0
0 ) -1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 2 ) 1 1 1 11 11 11 2
10
)
-1
1
-1
1 11 1 1 11 12 -1 0 0 y 1 ly 1 p t 1 ov 1 ar 1 9-
10
10
-1
10
-1 y1 ly pt ov r1
y1 t1 ov ar
9 1 1 a u e 0 0 a u Se Ma
9- 10 10 ay ul ep (0 2 0 20 'M 'J 'S 'N t M . ( 0 2 2 'M 'J ' 'N t
M.
0 0 0 J N M e
M.
( 2 2 ' M ' ' S '
et e B.
M Q2 Q4 rg
B. Q2 Q4 rg B. Q2 Q4 rg Ta
Ta Ta
INVENTORY Total Numbers – 7200 Sets INVENTORY Total Numbers – 2800 Set
BINS FOR SAND CORES ONLINE SUPPLY OF CORES ACTIONS
61 %
1) Component wise Minimum Inventory
decided
Quality
Improvements
Kaizen ,
Poka yoke
implementation Material
Handling
improvements
Develop
Self
Certified vendors
‘2S’ implementation
To avoid mix up
1
Crank Case Handle
LH 1
Bar
Crank Case
23 Cylinder Block
RH 35
3W4S
POKAYOKE
BEFORE AFTER
DEVELOPED 40 NOS
SELF CERTIFIED
VENDORS
Unit Of
Sr. No. Makigami Topic Before After
Measurement
Paint Shop
Management Loss
Down By 90%
BM 60%
BM 20%
Nos /Man
M 11 Kaizen / Man/ Month / Month. 0.50 2 1.92
3
800
Nos / Month
Nos / Man
584 2.5
600
487
2
393
400 1.82 1.9 2
307
225 1.56 1.64 1.72 1.5
1.44 147 1.5
200 1 1
50 72
0 0.5
BM / 09-10 Q1 / 10-11 Q2 / 10-11 Q3 / 10-11 Q4 / 10-11 Q1 / 11-12 Q2 / 11-12 Q3/ 11-12 Target
March 12
Kaizen/Month Kaizen / Man / Month
BM Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Target
Month
09-10 10-11 10-11 10-11 10-11 11-12 11-12 11-12 Mar-12
Cumm. Kaizen trend 50 72 147 225 307 393 487 584 1050
Kaizen / Man / Month 1 1.44 1.50 1.56 1.64 1.72 1.82 1.90 2.0
Kaizen
implementation
Award photo
Highest suggestion
Recommendation
For Award Best suggestion