Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3K views

    Criteria For Validating Research Instrument

    Uploaded by

    jorge maiz
    This document outlines criteria for validating a research instrument proposed by Carter V. Good and Douglas E. Scates. The criteria include 8 questions about whether the instrument's questions are on the subject being studied, clear, extract meaningful and stable responses, show a reasonable variation in responses, and are consistent with existing knowledge. Three jurors are to rate the instrument on each of the 8 criteria from 1 to 4 and provide an average rating and interpretation. Suggestions for modifications can also be included.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Criteria For Validating Research Instrument

    Uploaded by

    jorge maiz
    3K views2 pages
    This document outlines criteria for validating a research instrument proposed by Carter V. Good and Douglas E. Scates. The criteria include 8 questions about whether the instrument's questions are on the subject being studied, clear, extract meaningful and stable responses, show a reasonable variation in responses, and are consistent with existing knowledge. Three jurors are to rate the instrument on each of the 8 criteria from 1 to 4 and provide an average rating and interpretation. Suggestions for modifications can also be included.

    Original Title

    criteria-for-validating-research-instrument (1).docx

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document outlines criteria for validating a research instrument proposed by Carter V. Good and Douglas E. Scates. The criteria include 8 questions about whether the instrument's questions are on the subject being studied, clear, extract meaningful and stable responses, show a reasonable variation in responses, and are consistent with existing knowledge. Three jurors are to rate the instrument on each of the 8 criteria from 1 to 4 and provide an average rating and interpretation. Suggestions for modifications can also be included.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    3K views2 pages

    Criteria For Validating Research Instrument

    Uploaded by

    jorge maiz
    This document outlines criteria for validating a research instrument proposed by Carter V. Good and Douglas E. Scates. The criteria include 8 questions about whether the instrument's questions are on the subject being studied, clear, extract meaningful and stable responses, show a reasonable variation in responses, and are consistent with existing knowledge. Three jurors are to rate the instrument on each of the 8 criteria from 1 to 4 and provide an average rating and interpretation. Suggestions for modifications can also be included.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Criteria for Validating the Research Instrument

    (By: Good and Scates)

    Kindly rate the instrument for “_______title of the


    study_____” based on the criteria set forth by Carter V.
    Good and Douglas E. Scates, with the following criteria:

    4- Excellent; 3- Very Good; 2-Good;1-Needs Improvement.

    Criteria 4 3 2 1
    1 Are the questions on the subject?
    2 Are the question perfectly clear and un ambiguous?
    Do the questions get at something stable, well-
    considered, non-superficial and non-ephemeral but
    3
    something which is typical of the individual or of the
    situation?
    Do the questions pull or have or extractive power
    4 that is.. it will be respondents to by a large enough
    proportion of respondents?
    Do the responses shown reasonable range of
    5
    variation?
    Is the information obtained consistent? Does it agree
    6
    with what is known?
    7 Are the items sufficiently inclusive?
    Is there a possibility of using an external criterion to
    8
    evaluate the questionnaire?

    Average __Ave_ - Interpretaion

    Comments/Suggestions and Modifications:


    _____________________________________________________________________
    _____________________________________________________________________
    _____________________________________________________________________
    _____________________________________________________________________

    __________________________________
    Validator’s Signature over Printed Name
    2

    Criteria for Validating the Research Instrument


    CONSOLIDATED RESULT
    (By: Good and Scates)

    Kindly rate the instrument for “_______title of the


    study_____” based on the criteria set forth by Carter V.
    Good and Douglas E. Scates, with the following criteria:

    4- Excellent; 3- Very Good; 2-Good;1-Needs Improvement.

    Criteria Juror 1 Juror 2 Juror 3

    1 Are the questions on the subject?

    2 Are the question perfectly clear and un ambiguous?


    Do the questions get at something stable, well-
    considered, non-superficial and non-ephemeral but
    3
    something which is typical of the individual or of the
    situation?
    Do the questions pull or have or extractive power
    4 that is.. it will be respondents to by a large enough
    proportion of respondents?
    Do the responses shown reasonable range of
    5
    variation?
    Is the information obtained consistent? Does it agree
    6
    with what is known?

    7 Are the items sufficiently inclusive?

    Is there a possibility of using an external criterion to


    8
    evaluate the questionnaire?

    Average __Ave_ - Interpretaion

    Comments/Suggestions and Modifications:


    _____________________________________________________________________
    _____________________________________________________________________
    _____________________________________________________________________
    _____________________________________________________________________

    __________________________________
    Validator’s Signature over Printed Name

    You might also like