Failure Analysis of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers: Raj Kulsange MIS No.:121524006
Failure Analysis of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers: Raj Kulsange MIS No.:121524006
Failure Analysis of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers: Raj Kulsange MIS No.:121524006
Heat Exchangers
Raj Kulsange
MIS no.:121524006
Under Guidance of:
Dr. S. B. Patil
Hot Fluid
Cold Fluid
Station Mov
ary ing
head head
Direct
contact
Indirect • Regenerators
contact • Recuperators
Cross • Automobile
flow radiator
Cross • Automobile
flow radiator
Cross • Automobile
flow radiator
Multiple Shell
and Tube
Pass
Compact
Heat
Exchanger
Condenser
Evaporators
Environment
Stress
Corrosion Tensile
Cracking Stress
Susceptible
Material
High temperature
progressive
deformation of a
material at constant
stress is called
creep
HOW TO CALCULATE…?
Heat Q = U* A*LMTD
Transfer
rate
Overall
Heat
Transfer Area required for
coefficient heat transfer
Correction
Factor can be
found from data
book
• Design is safe
If yes
• Either change design
If no parameters or change the
material
College Of Engineering Pune
Improving life of tubes from fracture mechanics point
of view and reducing induced vibrations
Background…
1. The stresses in the heat exchanger tubes are mostly created by
water pressure flowing inside the tubes and vapor pressure of
the input/output steam/condensed in the entrance/exit areas.
2. Because of the high speed of the entrance steam during
entering into heaters, it can create vibration bending stresses
in the tubes located in the entrance area.
3. Fracture mechanics analysis including the fatigue crack
growth behavior can be used to predict the amount of bending
stress on the tubes in service
• Try to reduce
If No vibrational bending
stresses Δσ
Ci = a1 + a2Aa3
…Where, a1 = 8000, a2 = 259.2 and a3 = 0.93 for exchanger made with
stainless steel for both shell-and-tubes.
annual
Pumping operating
And…
power time
(h/yr)
Co = PCeH
Where Co is annual operating cost and can be
calculated as…
Energy Cost
College Of Engineering Pune
Cost optimization of shell and tube heat
exchanger
Each time the optimization algorithm changes the values of the design
variables do, Ds and B in an attempt to minimize the objective function.
Present approach uses the following steps for optimal heat exchanger design:
Step 1: Assuming values of a set of design variables and estimating heat
transfer area of the heat exchanger based on the required heat duty and other design
specification.
Step 2: Evaluation of the capital investment, operating cost and formulation of
the objective function.
Step 3: Utilization of the PSO algorithm to select a new set of values for the
design variables.
Step 4: Iteration of the previous steps until a minimum of the objective
function is found.
Optimum
point
Initial
point
1. After checking design from heat transfer point of view, designer has freedom to
choose between to modify the design of heat exchanger or to change its material.
Due to constraints of design one should try changing material.
2. If design is safe from heat transfer point of view it will not fail at high temperatures.
3. The vibration of tube is one of the main reasons of failure which can be prevented
by using of an impingement plate under the entrance gate, or installing one or two
baffle plates (DTS plates) supporting heat exchanger tubes in the input steam
region.
4. Life estimation from fracture mechanics point of view gives more accurate results
as it is not conservative method unlike life estimation from S-N curve.
5. If heat exchanger will fail in service, then the cost of each failure will be significant
as it can affect the production. Hence total cost incurred in operation of heat
exchanger must be optimized.
6. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm gives best way to optimize the cost.