Early Math FINE PDF
Early Math FINE PDF
Early Math FINE PDF
*This publication was originally developed by the Harvard Family Research Project as the
FINE Newsletter in May 2016. The Harvard Family Research Project separated from the
Harvard Graduate School of Education to become the Global Family Research Project as of
January 1, 2017. It is no longer affiliated with Harvard University. Please direct all reprint
requests to the Harvard Graduate School of Education.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Q & A with Laura Overdeck of Bedtime Math: Helping Families and Children Cuddle Up to Math
Margaret Caspe……………………………………………………………………………………8
Expert Commentary to “Daddy Says This New Math Is Crazy”: Three Tips for Teachers
Marlene Kliman…………………………………………………………………………………...16
Helping Teachers of Mathematics Integrate the Knowledge and Culture of Families Into Their
Practice
Margaret Caspe and Laura Alves…………………………………………………………………....19
This compilation of articles written by researchers and program developers offers important lessons
about engaging families in children’s learning of mathematics anywhere, anytime. Taken together,
they show that
• math is part of our everyday lives, and as such, is conditioned by relationships, culture, and
values;
• math can be an enjoyable parent-child experience; and
• digital media can be harnessed to promote math learning—for children and parents.
We invite you to share this issue with interested friends and colleagues. We also hope you’ll send
us what you are doing to support family engagement in early math.
1Duncan, Greg J., Chantelle J. Dowsett, Amy Claessens, Katherine Magnuson, Aletha C. Huston, Pamela Klebanov,
Linda S. Pagani, Leon Feinstein, Mimi Engel, and Jeanne Brooks-Gunn. 2007. “School Readiness and Later
Achievement.” Developmental Psychology 43, 6: 1428-1446.
These examples are amusing because we can all imagine young children advocating to be picked up
or wanting more cookies, but it’s important for families and educators to recognize these
interactions for what they are: opportunities for children to build on their foundational mathematics
knowledge as it is connected to their lived experiences.
Young children’s math development begins in infancy and continues throughout the early childhood
years and beyond. And children learn math anytime, anywhere, even before they go to preschool.
For this reason, families are critical to supporting children’s mathematics development. They can
provide this support directly by using objects for counting, stacking, and recognizing shapes. They
can also provide support indirectly, by connecting their children to math learning environments
outside of the home (e.g., in libraries, museums, early childhood programs). But to do so, families
need access to information about what math development is and how to support it, which is often
not clear or readily available.
Generally, families and educators recognize that number concepts are important for children’s math
development (for instance, knowledge of how many items are in a set, knowledge of the ordered list
of number words apart from counting objects, knowledge that one object is paired with exactly one
number word and that number symbols represent quantities). However, this is not the only area that
should be supported. Specifically, geometry and measurement also represent important areas young
children benefit from learning about in their homes and community settings.
Core geometry concepts include shape (two-dimensional and three-dimensional objects), spatial
orientation (where one is in space and how to get around), and relationships (where objects are in
relation to one another). Young children are also ready to learn about measurement beginning with
activities where they use rulers in addition to practicing with nonstandard units, such as a piece of
string.
Families can support children’s math development by providing environments that are rich in
learning. Families can teach children to see and name small quantities, count, and point out shapes.
How can families use print and media to support children’s math development?
Reading together is an important experience that can be used to teach about many subjects,
including mathematics. Examples of high-quality storybooks include The Very Hungry
Caterpillar, Mouse Count, and Inside Outside, all of which families can use during story time. Young
children are also exposed to many forms of technology, including television, online programming,
and app-based experiences. Given children’s inability to escape technology, families can take
advantage of it to support children’s mathematics learning.
The articles in this series clearly point to important lessons for both practitioners and families:
• Families matter for children’s math development. When families are engaged in their
children’s math learning—for example, by telling entertaining math stories, playing digital
media games, and doing hands-on mathematics activities at home—children’s understanding
of math concepts and math competencies increase.
• Mathematics learning starts in infancy and happens everywhere, all the time. For this
reason, families are critical to supporting math learning, and research from this series shows
that families can do it in unpressured and socially positive ways. For example, reading all
kinds of books with math content that is either implicit or explicit can lead to enjoyable
parent‒child conversations.
• Families and educators must share responsibility for supporting early math
development. Families need guidance and ideas for how to support early math
development. Educators in a variety of settings (such as teachers, home-based providers, and
librarians) can provide families with tips and ideas to encourage math learning. Similarly,
educators need to understand the cultural nature of mathematics, and incorporate family and
community practices into their teaching practice.
The free, developmentally appropriate research and programs provided throughout this series are
relevant to children and families from diverse cultural and linguistic backgrounds, and they provide
families and early childhood educators with rigorous math activities that are fun for the whole
family.
Parents and their children often read together, bonding as they explore reality and fiction, the
everyday and the fantastic. Children can learn about nature, animals, monsters, trucks, letters, and
words. Books can also help children learn about different math topics, including number,
operations, shape, space, and measurement. Book reading is a safe way for parents anxious about
math to engage their children in a warm, unpressured math activity, and for both to learn that math
can be fascinating and a source of intellectual excitement.
• Some books teach math directly. Counting books involve determining the number of objects
on a page. Shape books may define the figures, saying explicitly that a triangle has three
sides.
• Other storybooks, like Elevator Magic, ground the concepts in a cohesive narrative in which
characters explore math ideas and solve problems, like which button to press if the goal is to
make an elevator go from the 10th floor to another floor five levels down.
• A third category of storybooks includes math “implicitly.” On the surface, Goldilocks and the
Three Bears is about a young girl who goes for a walk in the woods and finds herself alone in
the bears’ home, where she gets into trouble. However, beneath the surface important math
concepts of size and order support the narrative. Papa Bear has a big bowl of porridge and
Baby Bear has a small bowl. Mama’s bed is both smaller than Papa’s but larger than Baby’s.
The story makes no sense unless the child understands the relative sizes of the bears and
how they relate to the bowls of porridge and beds.
Good books, implicitly or explicitly, can cultivate an interest in reading and in math. While reading,
parents can engage their children in stimulating math discussions. “Which bed is smallest? Why do
you think it belongs to Baby Bear?” Parents can use storybooks to engage their children in thinking
and talking about math.
• Read Together: It’s important that parents find opportunities to read with the child.
Storybooks alone will not guide children’s learning. Storybooks are not Apps for children to
use on their own. It’s the parent-child interaction that facilitates learning.
• Ask Questions: Parents should pause at appropriate points and ask questions like, “How do
you know?” and “How can you make sure?” and “Why is that the right answer?” Children
need to learn to explain and justify their thinking.
• Support the child’s learning: Parents can also support and reinforce children’s learning.
For example, in our study a father was reading Monster Music Factory with his young son when
three tambourines emerged from the machine. “How many tambourines?” the father asked,
prompting his son to practice counting the instruments. Although the father could have
been satisfied with the correct answer “three,” he instead took the opportunity to reinforce
the three-ness of the tambourines. “Want to touch them and hear the sound?” As the child
touched each tambourine, one at a time, the father counted along, “One, two, three.”
• Extend the child’s learning: Another good strategy is to help the child transfer learning to
new examples. For instance, in the example above, after the father and son counted
tambourines, the father went on to point to the three-eyed, three-armed monster. He asked,
“How many eyes does that guy have?” The goal was to draw connections between different
representations of three. His son was learning that the concept of three can characterize not
only tambourines but any three distinct items: three parts of a larger whole, such as eyes, or
three sounds, such as the shakes of the tambourines.
Bedtime Math is a nonprofit organization that strives to help kids love and appreciate math in
their everyday lives. Bedtime Math provides families and children fun math stories and
problems they can share together, and offers afterschool instructors and librarians a
curriculum for running math clubs.
In essence, Bedtime Math is a series of daily math problems that are embedded
within funny stories, riddles, or facts about the real world that families and children
can share and solve together before bedtime. Families can access the problems by
signing up for free daily emails, downloading the free Bedtime Math mobile app, or
by simply going to the Bedtime Math website. We also have a series of books with
many of the same problems. Each math story has three levels of challenge tailored to
fit three approximate age groups: wee ones (2–5), little kids (6–8), and big kids (9 and
older).
People often tell me, “I know to read to my kids, but it never occurred to me to do
math with them.” Bedtime Math fills this void, and gives families a way to get
involved in their kids’ math learning in a fun way. It’s important to emphasize that
these problems are not quizzes or workbooks. Although we provide families with the
answers, they are intended to be fun ideas to get families and children taking a
journey to talking about logic and finding solutions. For example, we created a
nationwide math activity for preschools and families to get involved in called March
of the Stuffed Animals. We are asking children to bring their favorite stuffed animals
to school and take a census of them. We want math to be something exciting to all
students—everywhere, all the time—and for schools to be a partner to help get this
idea out there.
We’re really excited here because researchers at the University of Chicago recently
conducted a randomized control trial of our app and found that using the app
increases math achievement among first graders across the school year. What was
really exciting was that even using the app as little as once a week makes a difference.
We also found that the app makes a difference especially for children whose parents
have anxiety about math. We speculate that what Bedtime Math is doing is giving
families and children comfort in talking about numbers and awareness of how math
is in everything, and that, in turn, is changing the types of conversations that are
happening in the home. Because remember: Our app is not about instruction about
math per se. It just offers short math problems.
In addition to the external impact studies, we also collect data using a variety of
metrics to help us improve what we do. We’re always interested in the types of
content that families and children are most likely to read—anything about vehicles,
animals, and food is always a big hit—and we find that videos are a big draw. For
Crazy 8s, we look at retention of kids across sessions and to understand from
coaches what some of the challenges are to holding math clubs. Some of the most
common challenges are finding space and working out scheduling.
What recommendations would you offer families who want to get more
engaged in their children’s math learning?
Finally, and maybe most importantly: Don’t say you hate math! You need to be
aware of how you talk about math.
Teaching cases are valuable tools in preparing educators to engage effectively with families.
They involve real world situations and consider the perspectives of various stakeholders,
including teachers, school leaders, parents, students, and other community members.
Through case-based discussion, students enhance their critical thinking and problem-solving
skills and consider multiple perspectives. “Daddy Says This New Math is Crazy” is a teaching
case that illustrates the mismatches that can occur in the teaching and learning of math. The
case is followed by Marlene Kliman’s commentary about ways to collaborate with families in
the development of children’s math abilities. See the appendix for case discussion questions.
Lena wiped her eyes and breathed a slow, calming breath before explaining. “Last night I was trying
so hard to get my homework done, but I couldn't remember how you taught us to do our two-digit
by two-digit multiplication. So I asked my daddy to help me out and when I tried to explain to him
what you had taught us about multiplication he said it sounded crazy. He said he had a better way to
do the problem, but when he showed me, it just didn't make sense. He had me multiplying and
adding all sorts of numbers up and down and diagonally. When I had to write my explanation of
how I did the problem I didn't even know where to begin! Ms. Martin, I am so confused. Daddy
says the way you are teaching us sounds crazy, but yesterday in class it really made sense to me. Is it
crazy?”
Beth walked into the teachers' lounge to spend her free period correcting the previous night's
homework. Her confidence and mood began to decline as she examined page after page of
incomplete, incorrect math homework. In many cases, her students appeared to perform traditional
While Beth was contemplating this question, two colleagues, Ray Donaldson and Darlene Brown
entered the lounge, threw down their mountainous stacks of papers, and plopped down into the
tattered vinyl chairs. Noticing Beth's pensive look, Ray, a fellow fourth grade teacher sarcastically
asked, “Beth, so what about this job could possibly have you looking so concerned?” The group
giggled realizing the humor in such a statement.
“Well Ray, to name one of the hundred things, I am struggling with the new Investigations
curriculum. The classroom implementation of the program is really going well. My students are
progressing nicely and are obviously enjoying math. In my own experience, I have never seen such a
positive student response to a math curriculum. But homework has been such a problem for my
students. Just this morning Lena was really upset about her father's help with an assignment. After
telling her that the math we are teaching here is ‘crazy,’ he taught her the traditional algorithm for
two-digit by two-digit multiplication. She was so confused about how to solve the problem, and who
she should believe.”
“Oh Beth, this is just the beginning,” Darlene Brown confessed. “This will happen every time a new
program or curriculum is thrown in front of your face and you're expected to understand and
implement it. Parents are rarely notified of the changes when they happen. Nor are they told about
the benefits and challenges of the new curriculum or how to deal with it at home. Basically, the
teachers have to spend the next few years demystifying and defending the program to parents
hoping they will either embrace it or give up questioning it. By that time we are changing the
curriculum again anyway. Don't worry honey, you'll get use to it.”
Ray and Darlene chuckled empathetically for Beth. Ray added, “Actually, the other day I got a note
from one of the directors of the after school program down the street. I guess they're getting some
questions and grief from parents because the tutors don't understand the homework, which is done
during the program. This made me think that our school should extend the professional
development around the curriculum not just to teachers, but also to parents and after school
program tutors.”
“While they're at it, how about a course for the teaching staff on working with parents. I'm 10 years
into this profession and I still don't have a handle on that one,” admitted Darlene.
“So obviously I'm not the first teacher to feel the gap between what we know about the curriculum
and what parents know. Why isn't this being addressed?” Beth asked.
Darlene explained, “The problem is finding someone who'll listen and then hoping they'll act on
your suggestion. When you have as many years as we do you tend to act first without asking, hoping
no one will mind.”
Ray scrunched his face in a guilty manner, “Well, to be honest I haven't done a great job addressing
the issue. I guess I've just been encouraging families to attend the math nights and sending the unit
letters home consistently, being sure to print them in Spanish and English.”
Darlene lightly punched Ray in the shoulder. “Oh come on Ray, you know full well those family
nights aren't enough. Yeah, the attendance is great and the idea of families spending quality time
together focused on academics is exciting, but is that all the parents need?”
Realizing her free period was up, Beth packed up her worn canvas bag, said her goodbyes, and
trudged back to her classroom. As she passed the front office she nearly collided with the principal.
“Oh, good morning, Maestra. I have been looking for you. I just got a phone call from Lena's father,
Mr. Caridon, and he would like you to call him regarding Lena's homework last night. He said they
were having trouble and that Lena got upset when he tried to help. I told him you would call him
when you had a moment today.”
“Last night she came to me asking if I could remind her which of the digits of the left number went
with which digits of the right number? I told her that whatever she was talking about seemed a bit
mixed up and she first had to set the numbers up on top of each other. I thought it was rather
strange that she didn't do this to begin with, so I asked her to bring me her textbook to help her
figure it out. When she told me they didn't have a book I was pretty surprised. From there I just had
to use the way I was taught to do multiplication in elementary school. Why is Ms. Martin teaching
math skills differently from the way I was taught? Maybe it is explained in the letters she sends home
each month or so, but my wife and I really don't understand them. I called Ms. Martin today to
express my concerns and maybe schedule a meeting to talk about this new math program.”
“My biggest concern is how parents are being prepared to deal with the new math. A lot of parents
don't understand the shift in teaching methods and conclude that it's ‘crazy.’ I don't think they
realize how this attitude undermines our teaching and sends negative messages to the students. I
know that Principal Ramirez has made family involvement a priority for our school and started math
nights, where parents can play some of the math games we use in the classroom. However, I think
parents may need to see teachers teach a lesson, or explain the Investigations approach to teaching
basic concepts such as multiplication or division. Somehow we need to defend why we've chosen
this program and how parents can support it in the home.”
“Oh, hello Ms. Martin, thanks for calling me back. I guess Lena already told you that we had a bit of
trouble with the assignment. Well actually, my issue is a bit larger than that one assignment. I am
really struggling to understand this new math curriculum. Last night I showed my daughter a simple
two-digit by two-digit multiplication problem setup and she stared at it with a puzzled look on her
face. It was as if she'd never seen it before. In talking to other parents, they seem to have similar
experiences and concerns. The kids don't even have math textbooks to refer to. I really think you are
a great teacher and care a lot about your students. Lena tells us this all the time. But I am seriously
questioning the math instruction that is going on in your classroom.”
“Well, Mr. Caridon, the principal mentioned that you were concerned about the homework, but she
didn't mention your greater concern.”
“I didn't actually get into much detail with her. She seemed a bit rushed and quickly suggested I
attend the upcoming math night as a way to get involved and learn more. Maybe that would be a
good event for my wife and I to attend.”
The people and events in this case are based on real life accounts, but have been disguised to protect confidentiality.
Most parents, whatever their academic background, recognize the importance of math for children’s
school and career success; they are eager to support children’s learning at home.1 Yet, today’s
parents are likely to have learned arithmetic as a set of memorized facts and algorithms, in contrast
to current Common Core–aligned curricula that emphasize children developing the mathematical
knowledge needed to devise and explain their own arithmetic strategies.2
The “Daddy Says This New Math Is Crazy” case suggests the need to reconcile two sometimes
competing goals:
1. For teachers to implement a math curriculum that they (or their district leaders) believe is of
great benefit to children but that diverges substantially from traditional arithmetic, and
2. For parents to support their children’s math learning and feel confident that their children
are gaining a solid math education.
Below are several suggestions for achieving both goals simultaneously, illustrated with examples
drawn from Nana y Yo y las Matemáticas, a program in which parents and other caregivers
experience a new approach to math alongside their preschoolers over the course of a
year.3 Although the program involves younger children, the parallels are many: Most parents initially
harbor views that preschool math consists of little more than memorizing the counting sequence
and perhaps naming shapes. And at times they question the project approach, which involves
exploring shapes, quantities, patterns, measurement, and logic through play, crafts, and active
games.
Make communication with parents the focus of homework. Use the school day for engaging
students in learning or practicing with new strategies; for homework, ask them to demonstrate a
now-familiar approach to their parents. For instance, if they are grappling with two-digit-by-two-
digit multiplication in the classroom, have them demonstrate an approach to solving a two-digit-by-
one-digit problem to their parents. This gives parents a glimpse of the strategies children learn at
school and a basis for their reassurance that children can, in fact, carry out arithmetic computations
successfully and with understanding and meaning.
In Nana y Yo y las Matemáticas, parents report that the whole family benefits when children bring
home a math-related craft to share with family members or a math game to play with others at
home. Through these mathematical interactions with family members, children come to solidify
their understandings, and family members begin to appreciate just how much children are learning
and the value of the Nana y Yo y las Matemáticas approach.
Consider capturing children’s classroom problem solving on video. Inviting parents into the
classroom might help to allay their concerns, but visits to the classroom during the school day are
not feasible for all parents. With near-ubiquitous smartphones, even in low-income communities,
teachers can bring snippets of the classroom to parents via occasional videos sent via text.4
1 Johnson, J., Rochkind, J., and Ott, A. (2014, April 14). Are we beginning to see the light? Public
Agenda http://www.publicagenda.org/pages/math-and-science-ed-2010-full-survey-results; National Center for
Families Learning (Spring, 2014). Family Engagement Brief. Retrieved
from http://www.familieslearning.org/pdf/NCFL_Family_Engagement_Brief_.pdf
2 National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core
state standards for mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/Math/
3Nana y Yo y las Matemáticas, a collaboration between YMCA of Silicon Valley and TERC, builds upon the YMCA’s
Early Learning Readiness programs for children from birth to age 5 and their parents, grandparents, and other
caregivers. Nana y Yo y las Matemáticas is generously funded by the Heising-Simons Foundation.
4 Smith, A. (2015, April 1). U.S. smartphone use in 2015. Pew Research Center. Retrieved
from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/01/us-smartphone-use-in-2015/
Diane Kinch, president of TODOS, and Marta Civil, vice president of TODOS and a professor of
mathematics education at the University of Arizona, talk about ways to develop and support
mathematics educators to engage families in their teaching practices. Below are four interrelated
ideas that persist throughout their work:
1. Mathematics is cultural.
Mathematics is often viewed as a
discipline, consisting of correct
numbers, formulas, and
algorithms that exist in a
vacuum, without consideration
of language, culture, and time.
For this reason, mathematics is
sometimes equated with
intelligence in our society—that
there are abstract ideas and
symbols that people either grasp
or don’t. Consequently,
mathematics is often used as a
gatekeeper in schools and
applied to sort those who succeed and those who don’t. What TODOS helps mathematics
teachers understand is that mathematics is an activity that exists largely outside of school,
and it involves interactions among people in a community, based in part on their values,
beliefs, and culture. Families, in particular parents who have been schooled outside the U.S.,
are likely to bring different ways to do mathematics. For example, families might use a
comma, instead of a period, to indicate decimals. Differences might also extend beyond
simple functions. For example, families might view that the long division algorithm
traditionally taught in the U.S. is “inefficient” because students should be able to do the
subtraction in their head. When designing initiatives for family engagement in mathematics,
4. Learning is most powerful when families, students, and teachers are co-learners.
Teachers are best served if they develop the mindset that everyone is a mathematics learner.
Whether parent, student, teacher, or researcher, every person has his or her own values and
beliefs about what “counts” as mathematics and how it should be taught and learned. There
are a number of creative approaches for teachers to explore different beliefs in a
RESEARCH BACKGROUND
Early mathematics ability is a strong predictor of later mathematics achievement and overall
academic success.1 The study described in this paper attempts to evaluate an intervention designed
to engage families and promote mathematics learning in preschool children.2 The intervention model
includes a school-based curriculum whereby families attend weekly parent support meetings and
then use in-the-home PBS KIDS digital games, videos, and hands-on activities, all related to early
mathematics and all provided in both Spanish and English.
METHOD
Theoretical Framework
This work is guided by the PBS Ready to Learn Math Framework (see Figure 1). The framework
includes four main mathematical concepts, including algebraic thinking, and measurement and data.
Each concept is accompanied by concrete mathematical tasks that support these concepts.
For me, with my daughter, it was fun . . . I learned how to ask her more questions, and we found a way to
learn together.
I think the most exciting thing is to see more [parent] awareness of math all around. If there is something we
did, I think it was to at least open their eyes to see that there was math everywhere and that they can use it.
You know, by being in the car and playing a simple game of counting cars. Just opening their eyes to that.
IMPLICATIONS
Digital media, coupled with parent training on how to use it to support children’s learning,
is an effective way to improve mathematical competencies and narrow school readiness
gaps. The current intervention, if scaled up to reach more low-income preschool families, could
have a profound effect on kindergarten readiness in children in low-income communities, and could
perhaps affect children’s future academic careers. The intervention allows for children at all income
levels to progress in their mathematics abilities, and, most importantly, allows children in low-
income families to progress toward meeting important standards for kindergarten readiness.
With training, early childhood educators are well suited to support families in choosing and
utilizing digital media that can support children’s learning. As families gain more access to
educational digital products, they may look to early childhood educators for guidance around how to
responsibly and effectively use these new tools to support their children’s learning. Policymakers,
schools of education, and professional developers of early childhood education preservice and in-
service should anticipate families’ and providers’ needs as they build capacity of teachers and other
professionals to provide this support to families with young children.
This research digest is a summary of McCarthy, B., Li, L., Tiu, M., Atienza, S., & Sexton, U.
(2015). Learning with PBS KIDS: A study of family engagement and early mathematics
achievement. San Francisco, CA: WestEd. Retrieved
from https://www.wested.org/resources/learning-with-pbs-kids/
1 Burchinal, M., McCartney, K., Steinberg, L., Crosnoe, R., Friedman, S. L., McLoyd, V., & Pianta, R. (2011). Examining
the black-white achievement gap among low-income children using the NICHD study of early child care and youth
development. Child Development, 82(5), 1404–1420; Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston,
A. C., Klebanov, P., Pagani, L. S., Feinstein, L., Engel, M., Brooks-Gunn, J., Sexton, H., Duckworth, K. & Japel, C.
(2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446; Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D.,
Ramineni, C., & Locuniak, M. N. (2009). Early math matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics
outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 850–867.
2The intervention was developed, with funding from the U.S. Department of Education, as part of the CPB and PBS
Ready to Learn initiative, which supports children and family learning through the development and dissemination of
multiplatform math content for preschool children, especially those from low-income families.
3 Quasi-experimental design studies are frequently used when it is not logistically feasible to conduct a randomized
controlled trial where subjects are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups. Instead, quasi-experimental designs
typically allow the researcher to influence the assignment to the treatment condition using some criterion other than
random assignment.
5The research team collected data using the Test of Early Mathematics Ability, Third Edition (TEMA-3), a researcher-
developed assessment of mathematics skills related to the concept of shape, parent surveys, parent focus groups, and
parent meeting observations.
6 Technical Note: Adjusted mean differences in TEMA-3 scores show that the intervention group’s scores on the post-
test were higher, on average, than those of the comparison group (point estimate of 2.93; minimum detectable effect size
[MDES] = 0.22), a difference that was statistically significant (at the 0.05 level) after accounting for differences in
baseline test results and participant ethnicity.
Taniesha A. Woods, PhD, is the vice president of research and quality improvement at Lutheran Social Services
of New York. Taniesha’s research provides insight about ways to support teachers in their knowledge and delivery of
high-quality mathematics instruction, with an emphasis on improving the learning outcomes of low-income and poor
children. Her publications include the National Research Council report Mathematics Learning in Early
Childhood: Paths Toward Excellence and Equity and the book Preparing Early Childhood Educators
to Teach Math: Professional Development That Works.
Herbert Ginsburg is Professor of Psychology and Education at Teachers College, Columbia University. His work
focuses on the development of mathematical thinking in young children. He is currently engaged in development and
evaluation of math storybooks
Colleen Uscianowski is a PhD student in Cognitive Studies in Education at Teachers College, Columbia
University. She was formerly a special education teacher and adjunct lecturer at Hunter College. She conducts
research on early childhood math education and leads professional development workshops for teachers and principals
that focus on improving math instruction for at-risk students.
Victoria Almeda is a PhD student in Cognitive Studies in Education at Teachers College, Columbia University.
Her research interests include early mathematics education and learning analytics.
Cassie Freeman is a post-doctoral researcher in the Human Development department at Teachers College,
Columbia University. She designs and researches professional development and school change initiatives, focused on
mathematics teaching and learning.
Marlene Kliman is a senior scientist at TERC, a nonprofit STEM education research and development
organization in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Her background is in mathematics, development of mathematical
thinking, and educational technology. For more than 30 years, she has designed materials and methods for bringing
relevant, engaging, and hands-on math to a wide range of audiences inside and outside of school. She was one of the
authors of the first edition of the Investigations math curriculum.
Betsy McCarthy, PhD As a senior research associate at WestEd, Betsy provides technical assistance and
research expertise for a number of large projects, including Ready to Learn: Expanded Learning Through Transmedia
Content Study, in collaboration with the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) and the Public Broadcasting
Service (PBS).
• What is the teacher's role in explaining and defending curriculum changes to parents? What
is the school's role?
• How do you evaluate Lena's father's concerns about the new math?
• If you were Beth Martin, how would you defend the strengths of the new math curriculum
to Lena's father?
Objective II. To explore outreach activities for informing and engaging parents in curriculum
changes.
• Why aren't math nights at Winner Elementary School working as well as expected?
• What other strategies could the school use to earn parent support for the new math
curriculum?
• What skills do parents need to participate in their children's math learning at home and how
can the school promote these skills?
• How do Ray Donaldson and Darlene Brown, the senior teachers who empathize with Beth
Martin's concerns, deal with parents' confusion? How can communication among teachers
and school leadership improve to find joint solutions to supporting parents?
Since 1983, our team has provided leadership to promote strategies that build pathways for
children’s whole development across all learning environments. For more information, contact:
Web: https://globalfrp.org/
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @GlobalFRP
Facebook: GlobalFamilyResearchProject