Behavioral Vs Cognitive Approach

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Behavioral Vs Cognitive

Theory of Learning
BY ZARMINA KANWAL

Bahria University
KARACHI CAMPUS
Behavioral Vs Cognitive Approach

There are two major perspectives that attempt to explain the components of learning. The two
perspective are behavioral and cognitive approaches. Behavioral approaches view learning as a
behavior. The behavior is observable and can be measured. Cognitive approaches explain
learning as the acquisition of knowledge and the processing of information. There are several big
questions in the field of learning theory that both of these perspectives attempt to answer. The
most important question is: How does learning occur?

Behavioral Approach

Behavioral theories stress the importance of the environment in encouraging learning. Behaviorists speak
a great deal about stimulus response. The stimulus comes from the environment and the individual
responds. Behaviorists see learning as an experience in reinforcement. Individual difference is not a major
concern as everyone should act in a similar manner when facing similar stimuli.

The original behaviorists claimed that internal states like cognition, emotions and moods were too
subjective to give any credence to and that genetics should have no place in psychology; they believed
that observable behaviors were the only factors in psychology worth considering.

The law of effect principle developed by Edward Thorndike suggested that responses closely followed by
satisfaction will become firmly attached to the situation and, therefore, more likely to reoccur when the
situation is repeated. Conversely, if the situation is followed by discomfort, the connections to the
situation will become weaker, and the behavior of response is less likely to occur when the situation is
repeated. Imagine that you arrive early to work one day by accident. Your boss notices and praises your
diligence. The praise makes you feel good, so it reinforces the behavior. You start showing up for work a
little bit early each day to keep receiving your boss’s commendations. Because a pleasing consequence
followed the behavior, the action became more likely to be repeated in the future.

Thorndike would place a cat inside the puzzle box


and then place a piece of meat outside the box and
then observe the animal’s efforts to escape and
obtain the food. He recorded how long each animal
took to figure out how to free itself from the box.

Eventually, the cats would press the lever, and the


door would open so that the animal could receive
the reward. Even though first pressing the lever
occurred simply by accident, the cats became likely
to repeat it because they had received an award
immediately after performing the action.

Thorndike noted that with each trial, the cats


became much faster at opening the door. Because
pressing the lever had led to a favorable outcome,
the cats were much more likely to perform the behavior again in the future. Thorndike termed this the
“Law of Effect,” which suggested that when satisfaction follows an association, it is more likely to be
repeated. If an unfavorable outcome follows an action, then it becomes less likely to be repeated.

Conditioning is one of the main themes of behaviorists, and they name two major types of
conditioning, classical and operant.

Classical conditioning was discovered


by Ivan Pavlov during his famous
experiment with dogs. Every time
Pavlov fed a dog, he rang a bell. Pavlov
then rang the bell without feeding the
dog, and the dog salivated at the sound
of the bell. Pavlov had conditioned the
dog to respond to the bell by salivating.
Pavlov’s experiment served as the one
of the cornerstones of behaviorism.

The food acted as an unconditioned


stimulus to the dog, because food is
something that a dog is naturally drawn
to. Likewise, the salivation of the dog
was an unconditioned response to that
stimulus because food naturally causes
a dog to salivate. But the sound of a bell
doesn’t naturally cause a dog to salivate,
so the bell acted as a conditioned
stimulus and the salivation at the sound of the bell was a conditioned response.

Operant conditioning (sometimes called instrumental conditioning) operates through reward (for good
behavior) and punishment (for bad behavior).
Cognitive Approach

Cognitivist agree with the influence of the environment in learning but downplay its role. For them,
learning is about how students’ encode, store, and or transfer learning within their mind. The learner’s
thoughts play an important role in their learning. Reflection
and asking questions all play a part in the learning of
students.

Imagine what it would be like if you did not have a mental


model of your world. It would mean that you would not be
able to make so much use of information from your past
experience or to plan future actions.

Schemas are the basic building blocks of such cognitive


models, and enable us to form a mental representation of
the world.
When a person’s existing schemas are capable of explaining
what it can perceive around it, it is said to be in a state of
equilibrium, i.e., a state of cognitive (i.e., mental) balance.

Cognitive approach views intellectual growth as a process


of adaptation (adjustment) to the world. This happens
through:

Assimilation: Which is using an existing schema to deal with a new object or situation.
Accommodation: This happens when the existing schema (knowledge) does not work, and needs to be
changed to deal with a new object or situation.
Equilibration: This is the force which moves development along. Piaget believed that cognitive
development did not progress at a steady rate, but rather in leaps and bounds.

Equilibrium occurs when a child's schemas can deal with most new information through assimilation.
However, an unpleasant state of disequilibrium occurs when new information cannot be fitted into
existing schemas (assimilation). Equilibration is the force which drives the learning process as we do not
like to be frustrated and will seek to restore balance by mastering the new challenge (accommodation).
Once the new information is acquired the process of assimilation with the new schema will continue
until the next time we need to make an adjustment to it.

You might also like