Bernal Vs House

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

BERNAL V JV HOUSE (1930)

G.R. No. L-30741 January 30, 1930


TOMAS BERNAL and FORTUNATA ENVERSO, plaintiffs-appellants, vs. J. V. HOUSE and TACLOBAN ELECTRIC and ICE
PLANT, LTD., defendants-appellee.

FACTS:
On the evening of April 10, 1925, the procession of Holy Friday was held in Tacloban, Leyte. Fortunata Enverso with her
daughter Purificacion Bernal came from another municipality to attend the religious celebration. After the procession was
over, the woman and her daughter, accompanied by two other persons by the names of Fausto and Elias, passed along a
public street named Gran Capitan. The little girl was allowed to get a short distance in advance of her mother and her
friends. When in front of the offices of the Tacloban Electric & Ice Plant, Ltd., and automobile appeared from the opposite
direction which so frightened the child that she turned to run, with the result that she fell into the street gutter. At that
time there was hot water in this gutter or ditch coming from the Electric Ice Plant of J.V. House. When the mother and her
companions reached the child, they found her face downward in the hot water. Her clothes were immediately removed
and, then covered with a garment, the girl was taken to the provincial hospital. There she was attended by the resident
physician, Dr. Victoriano A. Benitez. Despite his efforts, the child died that same night at 11:40 o'clock.
Defense:
The hot water was permitted to flow down the side of the street Gran Captain with the knowledge and consent of the
authorities; that the cause of death was other than the hot water; and that in the death the plaintiffs contributed by their
own fault and negligence.

DECISION OF LOWER COURTS:


(1) Court of First Instance – Leyte: denied them P15,000 damages from J.V. House and the Tacloban Electric & Ice Plant,
Ltd., for the death of the child as a consequence of burns alleged to have been caused by the fault and negligence of the
defendants.

ISSUE:
Whether the company is liable

RULING:
Yes.
The mother and her child had a perfect right to be on the principal street of Tacloban, Leyte, on the evening when the
religious procession was held. There was nothing abnormal in allowing the child to run along a few paces in advance of
the mother. No one could foresee the coincidence of an automobile appearing and of a frightened child running and falling
into a ditch filled with hot water.
The contributory negligence of the child and her mother, if any, does not operate as a bar to recovery, but in its strictest
sense could only result in reduction of the damages.
The plaintiffs are Tomas Bernal and Fortunata Enverso. The latter was the mother of Purificacion Bernal and the former
was the natural

father, who had never legally recognized his child. The daughter lived with the mother, and presumably was supported by
her. Under these facts, recovery should be permitted the mother but not the father.
As to the defendants, they are J.V. House and the Tacloban Electric & Ice Plant, Ltd., J.V. House was granted a franchise by
Act No. 2700 of the Philippine Legislature approved on March 9, 1917. He only transferred this franchise formally to the
Tacloban Electric & Ice Plant, Ltd. on March 30, 1926, that is, nearly a year after the death of the child Purificacion Bernal.
Under these facts, J.V. House is solely responsible.

You might also like