Bernardo V Legaspi

BERNARDO V LEGASPI
29 Phil 12
MORELAND; December 23, 1914
NATURE
Appeal from a judgment of CFI Manila dismissing the complaint on the merits filed in an action to recover damages for injuries
FACTS
- Due to a collision between the respective automobiles of Bernardo and Legaspi, the former filed an action to recover damages for
injuries sustained by his car which he alleged were by reason of Legaspi's negligence in causing said collision.
Legaspi, on the other hand, filed a cross-complaint alleging it was Bernardo's fault. He also asks for damages.
- The lower court found upon the evidence that both the plaintiff and the defendant were negligent in handling their automobiles and
that said negligence was of such a character and extent on the part of both as to prevent either from recovering.
ISSUE
WON the parties may recover damages
HELD
1. NO
- Where two automobiles, going in opposite directions, collide on turning a street corner, and it appears from the evidence and is
found by the trial court that the drivers thereof were equally negligent and contributed equally to the principal occurrence as
determining causes thereof, neither can recover of the other for damages suffered.
BERNAL V HOUSE
54 PHIL 327
MALCOLM; January 30, 1930
FACTS
-
Fortunata Enverso with her daughter Purificacion Bernal went to Tacloban, Leyte to attend the procession of Holy Friday.
After the procession, they, accompanied by two other persons, passed along a public street named Gran Capitan.
The little girl was allowed to get a short distance in advance of her mother and her friends.
While in front of the offices of the Tacloban Electric & Ice Plant, Ltd., an automobile appeared on which frightened the child. She
turned to run, but fell into the street gutter. At that time there was hot water in this gutter or ditch coming from the Electric Ice Plant of
J.V. House.
When the mother and her companions reached the child, they found her face downward in the hot water.
The girl was taken to the provincial hospital. Despite his efforts, the child died that same night.
It was certified that the cause of death was "Burns, 3rd Degree, whole Body", and that the contributory causes were "Congestion of
the Brain and visceras of the chest & abdomen.
The defense was that the hot water was permitted to flow down the side of the street Gran Captain with the knowledge and consent
of the authorities; that the cause of death was other than the hot water; and that in the death the plaintiffs contributed by their own
fault and negligence.
The trial judge, however, after examination of the evidence presented by the defendants, failed to sustain their theory of the case,
except as to the last mentioned special defense. He nevertheless was led to order the dismissal of the action because of the
contributory negligence of the plaintiffs.
ISSUE
WON the action should be dismissed due to the contributory negligence of the plaintiffs
HELD
NO
- The death of the child was the result of fault and negligence in permitting hot water to flow through the public streets, there to
endanger the lives of passers-by who were unfortunately enough to fall into it
- The mother and her child had a perfect right to be on the principal street of Tacloban, Leyte, on the evening when the religious
procession was held.
- There was nothing abnormal in allowing the child to run along a few paces in advance of the mother. No one could foresee the
coincidence of an automobile appearing and of a frightened child running and falling into a ditch filled with hot water.
- The doctrines announced in the much debated case of Rakes vs. Atlantic, Gulf and Pacific Co. ([1907], 7 Phil., 359), still rule.
Article 1902 of the Civil Code must again be enforced. The contributory negligence of the child and her mother, if any, does
not operate as a bar to recovery, but in its strictest sense could only result in reduction of the damages.
DISPOSITION Judgment appealed from was in part be reversed and in the court of origin another judgment was issued in favor of
Fortunata Enverso and against J.V. House for the amount of P1,000, and for the costs of both instances.
SEPARATE OPINION
ROMUALDEZ [dissent]
- Even taking the finding that the defendant by its negligence helped to bring about the accident which resulted in the death of the
child Purificacion Bernal, plaintiff, by negligence, contributed to that most regrettable result.
- Judgment appealed from should be affirmed.

Bernardo V Legaspi

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Bernardo V Legaspi

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Bernardo V Legaspi

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

BERNARDO V LEGASPI

You might also like