Septic Peritonitis: CE Article

CE Article 3 CE
CREDITS
Septic Peritonitis
William T. N. Culp, VMD, DACVS
University of California-Davis
David E. Holt, BVSc, DACVS

University of Pennsylvania
Abstract: Bacterial septic peritonitis is a serious condition that requires immediate treatment. The pathogenesis is complex,
and the list of diagnostic differentials is extensive. The keys to successful treatment are early recognition of the condition and
elimination of the causative organism. Multiple options for draining the peritoneal cavity exist, and further studies are neces-
sary to establish specific, evidence-based guidelines. The prognosis is generally guarded in dogs and cats. Much depends on
whether the patient develops concurrent sepsis, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, or multiple organ dysfunction
syndrome.
S
eptic peritonitis is a life-threatening condition that Neutrophils, Macrophages, and Mast Cells
occurs secondary to many intraabdominal diseases in Normally, the peritoneal cavity contains a diverse array of
dogs and cats. This article reviews bacterial peritonitis cells capable of reacting to antigens.10,11 When a peritoneal
and sepsis and describes treatment options and prognosis. injury occurs, vasoactive substances (e.g., histamine) are
released. Histamine from degranulating resident peritoneal
Anatomy and Intrinsic Defense Systems of the mast cells stimulates vasodilation and exudation of fluid con-
Peritoneal Cavity taining complement and opsonins that are capable of coat-
Mesothelium ing bacteria, promoting phagocytosis and encouraging an
The peritoneal cavity is lined with a serous layer of meso- influx of neutrophils and macrophages into the peritoneal
thelial cells.1–3 After peritoneal injury, regeneration begins cavity.7,10,11 Peritoneal mast cells, neutrophils, macrophages,
with an influx of round cells that eventually transform into and lymphocytes interact to promote cytokine expression,
mesothelial cells. This regeneration can occur as rapidly as chemoattraction, and phagocyte recruitment. Phagocytes
4 hours after injury.2 kill bacteria by generating reactive oxygen species, acidify-
ing vacuoles containing phagocytosed bacteria, and releas-
Intraperitoneal Fluid ing hydrolytic lysosomal enzymes.11
A small amount of fluid is normally found within the perito-
neal cavity. This fluid constantly lubricates organs to prevent Complement System
friction. Normal human peritoneal fluid has been shown to Complement system proteins control inflammation and
have antimicrobial activity against gram-positive and gram- assist in bacterial phagocytosis.10 The complement system
negative bacteria.4 can be activated by the presence of antigen–antibody com-
Fluid injected into the abdomen is dispersed throughout plexes, endotoxin, damaged cells, and other components of
the peritoneal cavity within 15 minutes to 2 hours.5 It is likely bacterial cell walls.12 Activated forms of complement com-
that peritoneal contaminants are disseminated by a similar ponents 3 and 5 are formed and act as anaphylotoxins. The
movement of peritoneal fluid.2,6 Fluid moves toward the dia- secondary effects of these complement proteins are vaso-
phragm, where it is absorbed by diaphragmatic lymphat- dilation, chemotaxis of neutrophils, degranulation of mast
ics.6–8 Bacteria in contaminated peritoneal fluid penetrate cells and basophils, clearance of immune complexes, and
the diaphragm through 8- to 12-μm gaps (stomata) between cytolysis.7,10,11
the peritoneal mesothelial cells and enter specialized lym-
phatic collecting vessels (lacunae).7 The bacteria travel from Fibrin and Abscesses
these vessels to the mediastinal lymph node and eventually The fluid exuded into the inflamed peritoneal cavity con-
to the thoracic duct system and bloodstream.8,9 tains plasma proteins, including fibrinogen and thrombo-
Vetlearn.com | October 2010 | Compendium: Continuing Education for Veterinarians® E1

©Copyright 2010 MediMedia Animal Health. This document is for internal purposes only. Reprinting or posting on an external website without written permission from MMAH is a violation of copyright laws.
FREE
CE Septic Peritonitis
FIGURE 1 ity.16 Any major abdominal organ may act as the septic nidus
for peritonitis.
Gastrointestinal
Leakage of contents from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is
the most common cause of septic peritonitis in dogs and
cats. GI diseases account for 38% to 75% of cases of sec-
ondary septic peritonitis,20–25 and GI ulceration accounts for
24% to 35% of GI-associated peritonitis cases21,23,25 (FIGURE
1). Conditions that predispose dogs to GI ulceration include
underlying hepatic disease (33%) and administration of
NSAIDs and corticosteroids.26 Concurrent administration of
NSAIDs and corticosteroids or administration of NSAIDs at
a higher-than-approved dosage may increase the risk of GI
ulceration.27 Many different NSAIDs28–30 have been linked
to ulcer-associated peritonitis in dogs. Carprofen was a
Perforated gastric ulcer. potential cause of a duodenal ulcer in a feline case report.31
Corticosteroid administration has been associated with
plastin.7 Tissue thromboplastin converts prothrombin to colonic perforation and peritonitis in dogs with interverte-
thrombin, which activates fibrinogen. Fibrin is generated, bral disk disease.32
polymerizes, and accumulates—in part because fibrinoly- Septic peritonitis can also occur after GI resection and
sis is down-regulated.13 Fibrin walls off bacteria, preventing anastomosis.33,34 In one study of 121 dogs that underwent
phagocytosis by neutrophils and macrophages and leading this procedure, the overall dehiscence rate was 15.7%, and
to abscess formation.6,7,11 However, fibrin also prevents sys- dehiscence was often fatal (73.7% mortality).33 Dogs that
temic bacterial spread. In one study performed in mice, pre- required resection and anastomosis for foreign-body entrap-
vention of adhesion formation resulted in earlier systemic ment or traumatic injury were significantly more likely to
spread of bacteria and higher mortality.14 have anastomotic dehiscence. Risk factors associated with
anastomotic leakage in another retrospective study included
Etiology preoperative peritonitis, hypoalbuminemia, and the pres-
Primary Peritonitis ence of an intestinal foreign body.34 The leakage rate for
In human medicine, peritonitis is generally categorized as dogs in that study was 14%. None of the 25 cats in the study
primary, secondary, or tertiary. Primary peritonitis occurs developed leakage.34
spontaneously, meaning that no obvious intraperitoneal Primary GI neoplasia and non-GI neoplasia (gastrinoma,
cause of bacterial contamination is found.8,15,16 This process mast cell tumors)26 can cause GI perforation. Neoplasia is
is more common in people than in companion animals and a common cause of GI leakage in cats, accounting for 25%
is generally associated with the presence of ascites sec- of septic peritonitis cases in one study.35 Adenocarcinoma
ondary to alcoholic cirrhosis.15,16 The presence of bacteria and lymphosarcoma were the most common neoplasms
in the peritoneal cavity in primary peritonitis is attributed reported.35
to spread via a hematogenous or lymphogenous route or Other documented causes of GI leakage include gastric
to bacterial translocation through an intact intestinal wall.15 necrosis secondary to gastric dilatation–volvulus (GDV),
Feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) is the most common cause gastropexy site leakage, megacolon perforation, postopera-
of primary peritonitis in companion animals.8,17 FIP occurs tive GI biopsy site dehiscence, uremic gastropathy, stress-
in two major forms: dry (granulomatous) or wet (effusive).18 induced GI lesions, and traumatic wounds.8,17,26,34–36
The wet form is characterized by abdominal effusion and Bite wounds to the abdomen should be explored imme-
peritonitis. The pathogenesis of this process is complex and diately to evaluate for viscus rupture that may result in the
still not fully elucidated.18 A retrospective study evaluating leakage of bacteria into the peritoneal cavity.37,38 Bacteria
peritoneal effusion in 65 cats found only four cases of effu- from the attacking animal’s mouth can contaminate the peri-
sive FIP.19 toneal cavity even in the absence of GI perforation. Gunshot
injuries can cause extensive damage to the stomach and
Secondary Peritonitis intestines. Five dogs in one series of 84 gunshot wounds had
Secondary peritonitis is the most common form of perito- peritoneal penetration.39 All five dogs had multiple, severe
nitis encountered in companion animals and results from intestinal injuries, emphasizing the need for early surgical
leakage of bacteria-containing fluid into the peritoneal cav- intervention in such cases.39
E2 Compendium: Continuing Education for Veterinarians® | October 2010 | Vetlearn.com

FREE
Septic Peritonitis CE
FIGURE 2 FIGURE 3
Severe pancreatitis with abscessation. Ruptured prostatic abscess (arrow).
Biliary Tract Urogenital

Bile leakage often results in septic peritonitis.40,41 Bile leak- Rupture of a pyometra is a potential but uncommon cause
age can occur from trauma, gallbladder infarction, necro- of septic peritonitis. This complication occurs either before
tizing cholecystitis, cholelithiasis, and iatrogenic biliary surgery or during surgical manipulation of the friable uterus.
damage (e.g., intraoperative manipulation, gallbladder Escherichia coli is the bacteria isolated in most cases of pyo-
expression, gallbladder aspiration).41–43 A retrospective study metra.53 Although not routinely evaluated in clinical practice,
evaluating 17 dogs and two cats with biliary tract leakage a lower blood endotoxin concentration is associated with
found septic effusion in 10 cases (seven due to necrotiz- a better prognosis in dogs with pyometra.54 A retrospective
ing cholecystitis and three due to trauma).41 Although not study of pyometra in 183 cats found that seven cats (3.8%)
compared statistically, animals in that study with septic bile developed uterine rupture. Four of these cats died as a result
peritonitis seemed to have a lower survival rate than those of septic peritonitis.55
with aseptic peritonitis.41 In another study evaluating extra- Prostatic abscessation can be life-threatening, and rup-
hepatic biliary surgery in dogs, septic bile peritonitis was ture of prostatic abscesses (FIGURE 3) resulting in septic
significantly associated with mortality.44 peritonitis has been reported to occur relatively frequently
in dogs (17 of 92 cases; 18%).56 Seven of these 17 dogs died
Pancreatic/Splenic/Hepatic within 1 week due to sepsis.
Abscessation of the pancreas, liver, or spleen is rare in dogs Septic peritonitis secondary to infection from the urinary
and cats. Pancreatic abscesses (FIGURE 2) are usually seque- system is rare.57 Documentation of renal abscessation is lim-
lae to the development of necrotizing pancreatitis, but they ited to a few case reports and a large retrospective study of
can also occur when a pancreatic pseudocyst becomes 61 dogs that included only three cases.58 Septic peritonitis
infected.45 Hepatic abscesses have been documented more may also be associated with trauma to the urinary tract and
often than pancreatic or splenic abscesses but are still a very subsequent urine leakage.58 One retrospective study evaluat-
uncommon finding in dogs and cats.46–49 The development ing uroperitoneum in cats found three positive bacteriologic
of septic peritonitis secondary to hepatic abscess rupture cultures among the five samples submitted from the peri-
was only documented in one case among several retrospec- toneal cavity.59 Enterococcus spp were the most commonly
tive studies.47–49 Septic peritonitis has also been documented isolated organisms in that study.59 Four cases of septic peri-
secondary to liver lobe torsion in one dog50 and liver lobe tonitis secondary to urinary tract infection were reported
necrosis in one cat.35 in another retrospective study.35 Sources of infected urine
Splenic abscesses accounted for 0.3% of all splenic dis- included a ruptured urinary bladder (n = 2) and leakage
ease in dogs in one large retrospective study51 and 1.7% from a diseased bladder (n = 1); the source was unknown
of all splenic disease in cats in another retrospective in a cat with pyelonephritis.35
study.52 However, these studies did not mention whether
the abscesses were septic or nonseptic, and the feline ret- Tertiary Peritonitis
rospective study included splenic abscessation in a general Tertiary (recurrent) peritonitis has not been documented in
category of splenitis.52 dogs and cats. In humans, tertiary peritonitis refers to a

FREE
FIGURE 4 cally important to this cascade, facilitating the
intracellular signaling that leads to cytokine
release after interacting with MD-2.65,68
The process by which gram-positive bac-
teria induce their effects is less well under-
stood. Gram-positive bacteria contain many
substances—including peptidoglycan, teichoic
acid, and polysaccharide–hyaluronic acid
capsules—that can act as proinflammatory
agents.65,69 Peptidoglycan released by bacteria
has demonstrated proinflammatory activities
that are mediated via the cell surface molecule
CD14. Teichoic acid also seems to use CD14
This figure demonstrates the process by which endotoxin (LPS) binds receptors to induce proinflammatory actions,
to LPS-binding protein (LBP), accelerating further binding between such as the production of cytokines, includ-
LPS and CD14 on macrophages. Binding is further promoted by interactions
ing interleukin 1 (IL-1), tumor necrosis factor
between CD14, TLR, and MD-2. The result of these interactions is the release of
cytokines (IL-1, TNF) from the macrophage. (CD14 = cluster differentiation antigen
(TNF), and nitric oxide (NO). Gram-positive
14, IL-1 = interleukin 1, LPS = lipopolysaccharide, MD-2 = extracellular adaptor pro- capsules are capable of inducing resistance
tein, TLR = Toll-like receptor, TNF = tumor necrosis factor) to phagocytosis.69 Gram-positive bacteria can
also produce superantigenic toxins that can
recurrent infection of the peritoneal cavity after an episode lead to T-lymphocyte activation and cytokine release.65,69
of primary or secondary peritonitis.60 This syndrome tends to
occur after optimal surgical treatment and manifests as sys- Cytokines
temic sepsis without an evident septic focus.61,62 Organisms The major cytokines in the inflammatory process are IL-1 and
cultured from the peritoneal cavity in cases of tertiary peri- TNF-α.67,70 Both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria
tonitis tend to come from the GI tract or to be lesser patho- can cause the release of these cytokines.69,70 IL-1 and TNF-α
genic organisms such as Candida spp or Staphylococcus initiate many events, including activation of the arachidonic
epidermidis.15,62 Bacterial translocation is thought to play a acid cascade, production of acute-phase proteins in the liver,
role in these cases because humans with severe illness are and induction of fever and intravascular coagulation.7,11,61
more likely to have intestinal hypoperfusion, altered gut These cytokines also signal peritoneal mesothelial cells to
flora, and inadequate gut barrier function.62 Recent studies release interleukin 8 (IL-8),11 which acts as a chemoattractant
of tertiary peritonitis have found a possible association with for polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs).
endocrine dysfunction and immune paralysis.62 Platelet-activating factor (PAF), high mobility group box-1
(HMGB1), and macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF)
Pathophysiology are cytokines or cytokine-like substances that are released
Bacteria from macrophages secondary to TNF-α activation.61,67 PAF may
The presence of a bacterial contaminant within the perito- be produced from the same membrane phospholipid as leukot-
neal cavity induces the cascade of events associated with rienes during inflammation.71 Leukotrienes and PAF increase
septic peritonitis. In animals, peritonitis is most commonly vascular permeability and PMN activation.71 LPS has been
associated with gram-negative bacteria.20,21,23,36 The effects shown to increase levels of HMGB1. Patients with increased
of gram-negative bacteria are primarily related to endotoxin levels of HMGB1 during sepsis have higher mortality.67 In mice,
(lipopolysaccharide [LPS]). Endotoxin is composed of three MIF has been shown to act as a proinflammatory agent and
parts: lipid A and two groupings of polysaccharides, the can alter the antiinflammatory effects of glucocorticoids.67
R-core and the O-polysaccharide.7,63 Most toxic effects are
attributed to the lipid A segment64 (FIGURE 4). Hypovolemia/Hypoproteinemia
Endotoxin binds to LPS-binding protein, thereby acceler- The combined effects of the inflammatory mediators (espe-
ating the binding of LPS to the cluster differentiation (CD) cially cytokines) increase vascular permeability and vaso-
14 antigen gene receptor on macrophages.7,14,63 A specific dilation.72 Increased vascular permeability results in fluid
interaction between the CD14 receptors, Toll-like receptors and albumin influx into the peritoneal cavity. The resulting
(TLRs, which initiate cellular activation), and the lympho- decreased albumin concentration in the intravascular space
cyte antigen MD-2 (another cell surface molecule) also pro- and decreased albumin synthesis in the liver during times of
motes binding.64–66 This binding stimulates macrophages to stress73 allow more fluid to extravasate as oncotic pressure
release multiple cytokines67,68 (FIGURE 4). TLR-4 is specifi- decreases.

FREE
As more fluid enters the peritoneal cavity, hypovolemia

worsens. This results in decreased venous return to the Key Facts
heart with subsequent decreased cardiac output and poor
• Septic peritonitis may not be immediately recognizable
tissue perfusion. Cardiac compromise may be worsened by
based on physical examination.
the release of a myocardial depressant factor.
• Peritoneal fluid analysis is essential to diagnosing and
Arachidonic Acid Cascade treating septic peritonitis.
The activation of the arachidonic acid cascade by endotoxin • Severe sequelae such as systemic inflammatory
and bacteria-induced cytokine release results in the produc- response syndrome or multiple organ dysfunction
tion of leukotrienes, prostacyclins, and prostaglandins.7,11,12,61 syndrome may still occur after the nidus of infection has
These substances recruit leukocytes such as PMNs and been removed.
eosinophils to the site of inflammation and can result in
vasodilation.7,61,71
fluid has also been shown to lead to increased bacterial
Coagulation Abnormalities numbers and decreased bacterial clearance.8
Many studies have documented coagulation abnormalities
that accompany sepsis.67,74–76 Both animals and humans have Nitric Oxide
been shown to develop a procoagulant state.67,75,76 Endotoxin Endotoxin, interferon γ (IFN-γ), lipoteichoic acid, and pep-
initiates coagulation by stimulating expression of tissue tidoglycan stimulate macrophage production of NO.65,69 In
factor,67,75 which in turn activates the intrinsic and extrin- addition, IL-1 and TNF can initiate transcription and transla-
sic coagulation pathways to produce fibrin. Fibrinolysis is tion of NO synthase.69 NO causes vasodilation, decreasing
impaired by high levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor systemic vascular resistance and resulting in hypotension.70
type 1 and down-regulation of tissue factor pathway inhibi- NO can also interact with reactive oxygen molecules (e.g.,
tor (TFPI), protein C, protein S, and antithrombin III.13,67,76 superoxide) to generate a series of cytotoxic nitrogen radi-
The role of sepsis in TFPI system dysfunction is not fully cals, including peroxynitrite.65
understood, but some authors have suggested that TFPI All of these processes culminate in the initiation of sys-
may not be able to deactivate the increased levels of tis- temic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and sep-
sue factor associated with sepsis.13 In addition, the structure sis. Antiinflammatory cytokines are produced to attenuate
of TFPI may be altered by the endothelial injury induced this massive reaction but can be overwhelmed. Eventually,
by inflammatory cytokines.13 Higher amounts of protein the effects of vascular compromise, poor tissue perfusion,
C are consumed, contributing to a decrease in levels. The thromboembolism, and infarction manifest as multiple organ
anticoagulant activity of protein C is also decreased by dysfunction syndrome (MODS), including acute respiratory
sepsis-induced increases in levels of protein C inhibitor.13 distress syndrome, pulmonary thromboembolism, pleural
Antithrombin III levels fall as liver production decreases and effusion, renal hypoperfusion and infarction, GI hypoperfu-
peripheral consumption and inactivation by activated neu- sion and perforation, vomiting, diarrhea, malaise, and neu-
trophils increase.13,77 The imbalance associated with a highly rologic infarction.
procoagulant state and decreased fibrinolytic activity results
in clinical disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and Clinical Signs
the formation of microvascular thromboses, further compro- Dogs and cats with septic peritonitis generally present with
mising tissue perfusion.13,77 vague signs. Many have a history of lethargy, depression,
vomiting, diarrhea, or collapse. These signs are nonspe-
Adjuvant Substances cific, and unless the history includes a penetrating perito-
Intraperitoneal mucin, bile, foreign bodies, hemoglobin, and neal wound or obvious trauma, the index of suspicion for
blood can worsen septic peritonitis. Gastric mucin decreases peritonitis may not be high. Clinical signs of vomiting and
the phagocytic activity of intraperitoneal macrophages by diarrhea may be associated with a primary GI problem (e.g.,
exerting an anticomplement effect.7,8 Bile salts destroy peri- foreign body) or may occur due to the developing peritoni-
toneal mesothelial cells, inhibit PMN function,11 and lower tis. Icterus may be encountered in animals with severe pan-
surface tension, leading to altered cell adhesion and destruc- creatitis or primary biliary disease. Hematuria, pollakiuria,
tion of red blood cells.8 Foreign material in the peritoneal polyuria, and polydipsia are common indications of uro-
cavity may induce bacterial translocation.11 Hemoglobin acts genital diseases such as urinary tract infection or pyometra.
as an adjuvant substance by interfering with chemotaxis Abdominal discomfort and distention are often noticed on
and phagocytic activities.7 Blood can be an excellent growth abdominal palpation.
medium for bacteria,11 and the presence of intraperitoneal Many animals with septic peritonitis present in shock

FREE
FIGURE 5 tion, and cholelithiasis.43 Liver enzyme values may also rise
in animals without primary liver disease and may be related
to alterations in hepatic perfusion.35
Animals with poor perfusion or sepsis may have hyper-
lactatemia.81 The plasma lactate level has been shown to be
a prognostic indicator in dogs with GDV,82 but its usefulness
as a prognostic indicator in septic peritonitis is less clear.
Septic patients may demonstrate hyperglycemia or hypo-
glycemia.83 Proposed mechanisms for hypoglycemia include
Pneumoperitoneum in a cat secondary to GI perforation endotoxin-induced hepatic glycogen depletion, increased
due to lymphoma. peripheral glucose use, and impaired gluconeogenesis.83
due to hypovolemia from intraperitoneal fluid loss and the Radiography and Ultrasonography
effects of SIRS. Animals may present in one of three broad Survey radiography is generally a first-line diagnostic tool
stages of shock: compensatory, early decompensatory, and when evaluating a dog or cat with suspected peritonitis.
terminal decompensatory. The clinical signs depend on Loss of abdominal serosal detail, ileus, and pneumoperi-
when the animal is evaluated.78 In the compensatory stage toneum are radiographic signs suggestive of intraperito-
of shock, animals are generally hypermetabolic with tachy- neal disease. Loss of serosal detail can be caused by free
cardia, tachypnea, and hypertension and may have injected peritoneal fluid or a mass effect. Ileus can be seen as a
mucous membranes with a rapid capillary refill time. In result of bowel obstruction secondary to neoplasia or for-
early decompensatory shock, tachycardia continues, but eign body ingestion but may also be induced by peritoni-
blood pressure decreases. In addition, the animal may have tis.84 Pneumoperitoneum that occurs without any history of
depressed mentation, poor pulse quality, pale mucous mem- recent surgery or penetrating wounds is most commonly
branes, and a prolonged capillary refill time. Tachycardia is of GI origin85 and warrants immediate surgical explora-
not as common in cats as in dogs during this stage. When tion (FIGURE 5). Radiography can also be used to diagnose
terminal decompensatory shock is reached, bradycardia, specific diseases, including GDV, GI foreign bodies,86 pyo-
hypotension, pale or cyanotic membranes, weak or absent metra,53 cholelithiasis, biliary emphysema,43 and organo-
pulses, and severe mental depression develop. Renal failure megaly secondary to intraabdominal abscessation (hepatic,
and pulmonary edema may also be encountered.78,79 splenic, renal, prostatic)46,47,49 or neoplasia.86
Ultrasonography can generally localize a tumor or mass
Diagnostics to a specific organ and guide sampling of free peritoneal
Clinicopathologic Findings fluid. Specific findings on ultrasonography relative to the
Anemia and leukocytosis are common abnormalities noted many disease processes that can lead to septic peritonitis
on complete blood cell count in animals with septic peri- are beyond the scope of this article.
tonitis. Band neutrophils are often present, and if the
infection is long-standing, the animal may be leukopenic. Peritoneal Fluid Analysis
Coagulation profiles may be normal in the early stages of Sample Collection
septic peritonitis, but prothrombin time (PT) and activated Several techniques can be used to obtain a sample of fluid
partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) often become pro- from the peritoneal cavity and have been detailed else-
longed. In animals with DIC, thrombocytopenia and higher where.87–91 All techniques involve clipping the hair in the
levels of fibrin degradation products and D-dimer may be area that will be tapped, preparing the abdomen with ster-
encountered. A hypercoagulable state can be detected by ile technique, and sterile introduction of a needle or an
thromboelastography.80 over-the-needle catheter. Ideally, this procedure should
Serum biochemistry findings vary widely depend- be performed with ultrasonographic guidance. Although
ing on the underlying cause and stage of the peritonitis. definitive studies are lacking, clinical experience with ultra-
Extravasation of protein-rich fluid rapidly leads to hypoal- sound-guided fluid aspiration suggests that this technique
buminemia. Increases in blood urea nitrogen and creatinine has a much higher yield than blind peritoneal tapping and
values may be prerenal (i.e., from decreased kidney perfu- decreases the need for diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL).
sion) or associated with primary renal disease such as pyelo- DPL is likewise superior to blind needle paracentesis.92 A
nephritis or (rarely) renal abscessation. Uroperitoneum may study comparing needle paracentesis, catheter paracentesis,
also result in azotemia or alterations in electrolytes. Liver and DPL found an accuracy rate of less than 50% for needle
enzyme levels increase with many primary hepatic and bil- paracentesis compared with 94.6% for DPL. DPL was 100%
iary diseases, such as biliary mucocele, gallbladder infarc- accurate in dogs with septic peritonitis.92

FREE
Complications are uncommon with these techniques. FIGURE 6

Needle paracentesis is generally considered safe, but there
is some disagreement about whether a syringe should be
attached to the needle.92 Some authors believe that the
lack of syringe attachment allows for the introduction of
air, causing pneumoperitoneum that confounds diagnos-
tics.91 Others think that suction with a syringe may increase
the risk of obstruction with omentum or abdominal viscera
and impede sample collection.91 Overall complication rates
for the placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters and DPL
have been reported at 4.7%; for significant complications
(e.g., splenic laceration, urinary bladder puncture), the rate
is 1.6%.91
Cytology
Normal cell counts for the peritoneal cavity are <3000 ×
106/L in small animals.89 One study 93 evaluated the use of Peritoneal fluid cytology shows (1) predominantly neu-
trophils that are mildly to moderately degenerate in
DPL preoperatively and postoperatively to assess cell count
morphology and (2) occasional mononuclear cells. A large
and intraabdominal enzyme content. The surgeries per- mesothelial cell is present in the center of the image.
formed in that study included GI resection and anastomosis,
cystotomy, gastrotomy, pyloromyotomy, and repair of a dia- the peritoneal fluid total nucleated cell count was >13,000
phragmatic laceration. Macrophages and segmented neutro- cells/μL.96 Cytology was diagnostic for septic peritoneal effu-
phils were the most common cells found in the peritoneal sion in 86% of the cases in the latter study.96 Other reports
fluid, and preoperative nucleated cell counts ranged from 71 have found cytology to be accurate in diagnosing septic
to 697 cells/μL. White blood cell and nucleated cell counts peritonitis 57%,25 87%,26 and 100%96 of the time.
were significantly increased in postoperative fluid compared
with preoperative fluid.93 pH
Septic effusions generally contain increased numbers of Peritoneal fluid pH as an indicator of septic peritonitis has
neutrophils and macrophages, and intracellular or extracel- been evaluated in dogs and cats. In one study,96 the pH of
lular bacteria may be present (FIGURE 6). Peritoneal fluid the fluid in septic effusions in cats was significantly lower
samples are specifically evaluated for degenerate neutro- than the pH of the fluid in nonseptic effusions. This study
phils. Bacterial toxins cause changes in the cell membrane did not find the same to be true in dogs. Comparison of
permeability of neutrophils, leading to cell and/or nuclear blood pH to peritoneal fluid pH was not found to be useful
swelling, nuclear fragmentation, and eosinophilic nuclear for dogs or cats.96
chromatin.88,90 The lack of degenerate neutrophils does not
rule out septic peritonitis,88 and it is important to differen- Glucose
tiate degenerate neutrophils from aging and toxic neutro- A study has found that comparing blood glucose levels to
phils.94 The presence of intracellular bacteria is diagnostic peritoneal glucose levels is diagnostic for peritonitis in 100%
for septic peritonitis.90 of dogs and 92% of cats.96 When the blood glucose concen-
Reagent strips that test for the presence of leukocytes in tration exceeded the peritoneal fluid glucose concentration
peritoneal fluid have been used to diagnose primary perito- by >20 mg/dL, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% in
nitis in humans. A PMN count of ≥250 cells/μL in ascitic fluid dogs and 86% and 100%, respectively, in cats.96
is considered the “gold standard” for diagnosis of primary
peritonitis, and in humans, the sensitivity and specificity of Lactate
some of these strips have been reported as high as 88.2% Peritoneal fluid lactate concentration has been evaluated in
and 99.6%, respectively.95 The use of these strips to diagnose two studies. In the first,96 a blood-to-peritoneal fluid lactate
peritonitis in small animals has not been evaluated. concentration of less than −2.0 mmol/L was found to be 100%
Results of using total peritoneal fluid leukocyte counts sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of a septic peritoneal
and cytology to diagnose septic peritonitis have been vari- effusion in dogs but did not reach statistical significance in
able. Peritoneal leukocyte counts ranged from 5,400/μL to cats. The second study97 reported an accuracy of 95% in the
43,100/μL in an experimental peritonitis model.93 One study diagnosis of septic peritonitis in dogs when the peritoneal
found an 86% sensitivity and a 100% specificity for peritoni- fluid lactate concentration was >2.5 mmol/L. When using a
tis in dogs and 100% sensitivity and specificity in cats when blood-to-peritoneal fluid lactate concentration difference of

FREE
Box 1 less than −1.5 mmol/L, the accuracy was 90% for the diagno-
sis of septic peritoneal effusion in dogs. Lactate concentra-
Medical Management Checklist for the tion differences were diagnostically inaccurate in cats.97
Treatment of Septic Peritonitisa
Culture
Fluid therapy Gram-negative bacteria predominate in septic peritonitis. E.
• Crystalloids coli is the most commonly isolated organism, being found
—Plasmalyte A in 57% to 74% of cultures from the peritoneal cavity. Other
—Lactated Ringer’s solution common gram-negative bacteria include Klebsiella and
—Normosol-R Bacteroides spp.20,21,25,36 Gram-positive bacteria that have been
• Colloids isolated include Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Enterococcus,
—Hetastarch and Clostridia spp.20,21,23,36 Commonly, multiple species of
—Dextrans bacteria are isolated from a septic peritoneum. In one report,
multiple organisms were isolated in 15 of 19 (79%) cases.36
Blood products
In dogs with cholelithiasis, bile cultures are often positive
—Fresh whole blood
for aerobic or anaerobic bacteria. One study40 found a posi-
—Stored whole blood
tive aerobic culture in 14 of 20 dogs and a positive anaerobic
—Packed red blood cells
—Plasma culture in eight of 18 dogs. Although cholelithiasis with sec-
—Albumin ondary biliary tract rupture is uncommon in dogs, it should
be considered in the differential diagnosis when a dog has
Analgesia septic peritonitis.
• Intravenous bolus In 23 cases of necrotizing cholecystitis treated surgically,
—Buprenorphine: 0.005–0.02 mg/kg IV, IM, SC q4–6h bacteria were found in 13 of 16 (81%) of gallbladder mucosa
• Constant-rate infusion samples submitted for culture. The most common bacterial
—Fentanyl: 1–5 μg/kg/h isolate was E. coli (69%). Nine of the 23 dogs died in the
—Lidocaine: 30–50 μg/kg/min perioperative period; the deaths were attributed to sepsis,
—Ketamine: 0.1 mg/kg/h peritonitis, or debilitation.98 E. coli has also been isolated in
59% to 96% of cases of pyometra52 and approximately 85%
Gastrointestinal protectants of cases of prostatic abscessation.55
• Antiemetics
—Metoclopramide: 0.1–0.5 mg/kg PO, SC q8h or
Medical Management
1–2 mg/kg/d IV CRI
Fluids
—Dolasetron: 0.6–1 mg/kg/d IV, PO
Fluid resuscitation is essential to the management of dogs
—Chlorpromazine: 0.2–0.5 mg/kg IM, SC q6–8h
• Antisecretory and cats with septic peritonitis. The goal of resuscitation is
—Famotidine: 0.5–1 mg/kg IV, IM, PO, SC q12–24h to restore and maintain tissue perfusion. The loss of large
—Omeprazole: 0.5–1 mg/kg PO q24h volumes of fluid and protein from the vasculature into the
• Cytoprotective peritoneal cavity, combined with vasodilation secondary to
—Sucralfate: 0.5–1 g PO q8h (dogs) systemic inflammation, can result in shock. BOX 1 provides
0.25–0.5 g PO q8–12h (cats) a checklist for the treatment of septic peritonitis.
—Misoprostol: 1–5 μg/kg PO q6–8h Both crystalloids and colloids are often necessary for
adequate resuscitation. Intravenous (IV) crystalloid solutions
Antibiotics (empiric) are the initial mainstay of intravascular volume replacement.
• Gram-positive coverage Ongoing resuscitation with crystalloids alone may lead to
—Ampicillin: 22 mg/kg IV q8h an increased capillary hydrostatic pressure and a decreased
—Clindamycin: 10 mg/kg IV, PO q12h plasma oncotic pressure. This decreased oncotic pressure
• Gram-negative coverage from dilutional and sepsis-associated hypoalbuminemia,
—Enrofloxacin: 10–15 mg/kg IV, PO (dogs) combined with the increased vascular permeability seen in
5 mg/kg IV, PO (cats) sepsis, can result in significant fluid extravasation from the
—Cefotaxime: 25–50 mg/kg IV, IM, SC q8h vasculature into the interstitial tissue spaces.
• Anaerobic coverage
Synthetic colloids such as hetastarch and dextrans
—Metronidazole: 10 mg/kg IV, PO q12h decrease the fluid volume requirement for resuscitation.
a
All dosages listed are for dogs and cats unless otherwise indicated. Natural colloids such as fresh whole blood, stored whole
blood, and plasma can also be given but do not provide

FREE
as significant an increase in colloid osmotic pressure (COP) with biliary obstruction and rupture because fat-soluble
as do synthetic colloids. Synthetic and natural colloids are vitamins, including vitamin K, cannot be absorbed without
often administered simultaneously because natural colloids bile emulsification of fat. Coagulation abnormalities are also
can provide other important substances such as coagulation commonly associated with nonbiliary peritonitis. In one
factors and albumin. study, septic dogs were found to have significantly longer PT
Several factors should be considered when administering and aPTT and higher levels of fibrin degradation products
crystalloids and colloids. In a patient with shock, boluses of and D-dimers than control dogs.74 When the PT and aPTT
both fluid types may be necessary. A shock bolus of crys- are prolonged, plasma should be given until these values
talloids in dogs (90 mL/kg) and cats (55 mL/kg) should be are within normal limits.
given over 10 to 15 minutes.8 The initial bolus of hetastarch An animal receiving a transfusion of blood products
in shock patients is 10 to 20 mL/kg given as quickly as should be watched carefully. It is especially important to
possible.99 Further boluses of these fluids may be required monitor pulse, temperature, and respiratory rate during the
depending on the patient’s status. If further colloidal sup- first 30 minutes of the transfusion. If a patient appears to be
port is necessary, synthetic colloids can be continued as experiencing a transfusion reaction, the transfusion should
a constant-rate infusion (CRI) at a dose of 1 mL/kg/h.99 be stopped immediately.103
Higher doses may be necessary if the COP remains low.
When administering CRIs of crystalloids and colloids simul- Antibiotics
taneously, the amount of crystalloid can be decreased by as If septic peritonitis is suspected, antibiotic use is manda-
much as 40% to 60%.99 tory. Ideally, the antibiotic regimen should be based on the
Fluid resuscitation goals include maintaining the mean results of culture and susceptibility testing. However, in
arterial blood pressure above 80 mm Hg and the heart rate most cases, empirical therapy is instituted while awaiting
between 80 and 120 bpm in dogs and 180 and 200 bpm in these test results. Dosing should be based on an under-
cats. Other parameters to maintain include central venous standing of the pharmacodynamic properties that predict
pressure (6 to 8 cm H2O) and urine output (>1 mL/kg/h). antimicrobial efficacy.
New human guidelines focus on arterial lactate levels and Antibiotic pharmacology is reviewed extensively else-
mixed venous oxygen saturation as more sensitive and spe- where.104 In general, β-lactam drugs (e.g., penicillins,
cific indicators of tissue perfusion.100 When administering cephalosporins) are classified as time-dependent, meaning
synthetic colloids, a COP of 17 mm Hg should be main- that their bactericidal effect corresponds to the amount of
tained while avoiding volume overload.99,101 time their plasma and tissue concentrations remain above
the minimum inhibitory concentration for the pathogen.
Blood Products Therefore, β-lactams should be administered frequently
Blood products can be required in animals with septic peri- to enhance efficacy. Conversely, fluoroquinolones and
tonitis for a variety of reasons. Animals with bleeding GI aminoglycosides are concentration-dependent drugs with
ulcers, peritonitis secondary to trauma, GDV, or avulsion maximum effect when a high peak plasma concentration is
of the short gastric blood vessels may need transfusions attained, even if only for a short period of time. Therefore,
of whole blood or packed red blood cells. The decision to the entire dose of these drugs is appropriately administered
transfuse an anemic patient with whole blood or packed once daily. General recommendations for broad-spectrum
red blood cells depends on several factors. In dogs and empiric antibiotic treatment in cases of septic peritonitis
cats, transfusions should often be given if the packed cell include either a penicillin or cephalosporin for gram-pos-
volume (PCV) drops below 20%.102 Other factors to consider itive coverage combined with either a fluoroquinolone or
include a massive loss of blood volume (>30%), ongoing an aminoglycoside for gram-negative coverage until culture
hemorrhage, inadequate response to fluid resuscitation, or and susceptibility data become available.
severe clinical signs (e.g., collapse). Transfusing 10 mL/kg Anaerobes are a large component of normal GI flora,
of packed red blood cells or 20 mL/kg of whole blood can especially in the colon. Not all anaerobes are susceptible
increase the PCV by 10%.102 to penicillins, and many are resistant to cephalosporins.105
Whole blood, packed red blood cells, and plasma can The addition of an antibiotic with documented or enhanced
be used for colloidal support, but these products can raise antianaerobic activity (e.g., metronidazole) is often justified
the oncotic pressure by only a limited amount.101 This and should be considered empirically while awaiting cul-
increase is often transient because of the ongoing loss of ture results.
albumin into the peritoneal cavity. However, fresh frozen
plasma transfusions are often used clinically to treat coagu- Analgesics
lation abnormalities associated with peritonitis and sepsis. Abdominal pain has been extensively described elsewhere86
Coagulation abnormalities should be suspected in animals and may be either visceral (dull) or somatic (piercing).

FREE
Analgesia is an important aspect of presurgical and post- dogs and cats with septic peritonitis. In humans, physiologic
surgical management. Opioids are a first-line choice for the doses of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone in a group of
treatment of pain in patients with septic peritonitis. Some septic patients with inadequate adrenocorticotropic hor-
opioids, such as morphine and hydromorphone, can induce mone stimulation resulted in a significantly reduced risk of
GI ileus and vomiting and cause dose-dependent respiratory death at 28 days.110 The incidence and role of adrenal insuf-
depression. These drugs should be avoided in patients for ficiency in septic peritonitis is under investigation in com-
whom further GI upset is contraindicated. Buprenorphine panion animals.
tends to have fewer GI effects and may be a better option The dose of corticosteroids in septic patients varies based
for these patients. The usual dose of buprenorphine in dogs on the purpose of administration. High doses of cortico
and cats is between 0.005 and 0.02 mg/kg. CRIs of analgesics steroids (hydrocortisone, 150 mg/kg, and dexamethasone, 4
may also be required. Common medications that are used in to 10 mg/kg)1,111 have been used in the treatment of shock,
analgesic CRIs include fentanyl, lidocaine, and ketamine. whereas much lower “stress” doses (hydrocortisone, 1 mg/
kg,112 and dexamethasone, 0.5 to 1 mg/kg) are used to treat
Gastrointestinal Protectants relative adrenal insufficiency.
Most dogs and cats with septic peritonitis benefit from GI
protectants. As these animals often experience vomiting, Insulin
antiemetics such as dopamine antagonists, serotonin antago- As with humans, septic companion animals often develop
nists, and phenothiazines may be indicated. Metoclopramide, insulin resistance.113,114 A study114 evaluating intensive insulin
a dopamine antagonist, has some prokinetic activity and is therapy in 1548 critically ill human patients found a decreased
contraindicated in cases of GI obstruction because increases mortality in those whose glucose levels were maintained
in peristalsis may lead to further “bunching” of intestine. with insulin at ≤110 mg/dL. Patients with a septic focus and
Phenothiazines have been associated with sedation and secondary MODS had the greatest reduction in mortality.114
hypotension.106
Drugs that decrease gastric acid secretion may also be Protein C
used. Commonly employed H2-receptor antagonists include Protein C levels can be decreased in people74 and dogs75
famotidine and cimetidine. Proton pump inhibitors (e.g., with sepsis. A multicenter study74 evaluating the administra-
omeprazole) are considered better alternatives to H2-receptor tion of protein C to humans with septic conditions found
antagonists in patients with gastric ulcers.106 some promising results. In that study, 840 patients received
Sucralfate and misoprostol are commonly used in cases a placebo and 850 patients received activated protein C. The
of GI ulceration. Sucralfate binds with ulcers and coats the patients receiving the protein C had a 19.4% reduction in
mucosa to prevent acid damage. Misoprostol has both anti- the relative risk of death and a 6.1% reduction in the abso-
secretory and cytoprotective properties, directly inducing GI lute risk of death compared with those in the control group.
ulcer healing. However, the incidence of bleeding was higher in the group
that received activated protein C.74
Other Medical Treatments
Corticosteroids Fluconazole
The use of corticosteroids in the treatment of septic perito- The antifungal azoles have demonstrated antiinflammatory
nitis remains controversial.107 Steroids were previously advo- properties by interfering with leukocyte function.115 It has
cated in the treatment of septic shock, based on membrane been suggested that fluconazole may decrease mortality in
stabilization and decreased vascular permeability.1 Steroids patients with bacterial sepsis.115 Fluconazole caused no side
also exert antiinflammatory effects by modulating cytokines effects (e.g., hepatotoxicosis) in a group of dogs with bacte-
(including IL-1 and TNF) and stimulating production of anti- rial peritonitis, but the number of subjects was too small
inflammatory factors such as IL-10 and IL-1 receptor antago- to determine whether fluconazole therapy produced any
nist.108 However, a lack of efficacy in the treatment of sepsis improvement in outcome.116
and septic shock has been reported,107 and their routine use
has fallen out of favor. Surgical Management
Recently, much attention has been paid in human medi- Despite the induction of numerous inflammatory cascades
cine to the early treatment of adrenal insufficiency in sep- in septic peritonitis, the crucial therapeutic intervention is
tic patients.108,109 In humans, sepsis and SIRS are the most surgical removal of the nidus of infection, once the ani-
common causes of acute adrenal insufficiency,108 decreasing mal is stabilized. After the patient is anesthetized, the hair
production of the glucocorticoids that help to modulate the over the abdomen should be generously clipped and the
inflammatory response in sepsis.109 area prepared with sterile technique and draped. The surgi-
It may be beneficial to obtain a baseline cortisol level in cal approach involves a large ventral midline incision often

FREE
extending from just caudal to the xiphoid cartilage to just Diagnostic positive-contrast imaging of the urinary tract
cranial to the pubis. can generally locate the site of urine leakage before surgery.
Obvious contamination of the peritoneal cavity should Unilateral ureteral ruptures are treated by primary repair
be removed immediately and thorough abdominal explo- or unilateral ureteronephrectomy, provided the contralat-
ration performed. When the inciting organ is identified, it eral kidney is functioning normally. Bladder ruptures are
should be isolated from the rest of the peritoneal cavity with located and sutured with 3-0 or 4-0 polydioxanone suture in
laparotomy sponges. a simple interrupted pattern. Incomplete urethral tears may
Leakage from the GI tract is the most common cause of be managed with an indwelling urethral catheter for several
bacterial peritonitis. Perforated gastric ulcers can generally days to weeks; complete urethral transections often require
be treated by partial gastrectomy. Duodenal ulcer resection surgical repair.
may be performed by a local resection of diseased tissue, Copious peritoneal lavage is an appropriate part of the
Y-U antral advancement flap pyloroplasty, or biliary rerout- standard of care for animals with septic peritonitis. The
ing, depending on the location and size of the ulcer. It is peritoneal cavity is viewed as a large, contaminated wound,
essential that sutured bowel edges be healthy and demon- and lavage with a large volume of warm, balanced electro-
strate sufficient blood supply. If a previous GI anastomosis lyte solution is used to remove bacteria and proinflamma-
has dehisced, the entire area must be removed and another tory cytokines, GI contents, hemoglobin, mucus, and bile.
anastomosis performed. The anastomosis site is reinforced However, peritoneal lavage is not entirely benign and may
by omental wrapping or serosal patching.117 Serosal patch- impair normal peritoneal defense mechanisms. Bacteria
ing has been used to treat defects in the small intestine, adhere to the peritoneal surfaces and may not be removed
colon, and urinary bladder.118 This technique involves sutur- by low-pressure lavage. Lavage may disseminate bacteria,
ing loops of jejunum over an area of questionable viability. remove opsins and complement proteins necessary for
As pancreatic abscesses are uncommon and little stud- phagocytes, prevent phagocytes from gaining access to bac-
ied, results of various treatment methods should be inter- teria, and damage peritoneal mesothelial cells.122 Detailed,
preted with caution. Omentalization of the abscess cavity controlled clinical trials studying the efficacy of lavage in
and abdominal closure resulted in better survival (five of companion animals with septic peritonitis are lacking. The
eight patients) than treatment by open peritoneal drainage following recommendations are based on experimental and
(one of four patients) in one study.119 human clinical studies:
Omentalization has also largely replaced Penrose drain-
age or partial prostatectomy for the treatment of prostatic • A large volume of lavage fluid should be used (e.g., 500
abscessation.120 Long-term resolution of disease (>12 months) mL to 1 L in a cat, several liters in large dogs).
was achieved in 19 of 20 dogs treated with omentalization. • A ll of the lavage fluid must be aspirated from the perito-
One dog had a ruptured prostatic abscess before surgery but neal cavity.
was successfully treated by combining prostatic omentaliza- • The addition of antibiotics to the lavage fluid has not
tion with open abdominal drainage.120 proved beneficial, provided the animal is receiving appro-
Treatment of abscesses in other abdominal organs priate doses of antibiotics parenterally.
generally involves removal of the organ in question. • The addition of chlorhexidine to the lavage fluid has not
Ovariohysterectomy is recommended in cases of pyometra; proved beneficial. Experimentally, 0.05% chlorhexidine
care should be taken to prevent leakage from the uterus reduced bacterial numbers in residual lavage fluid and
during its removal. Liver lobe resection, nephrectomy, and improved survival in a mouse peritonitis model,123 but it
splenectomy are recommended for abscessation of the liver, is potentially toxic to normal cells.
kidneys, and spleen, respectively. One study evaluating per- • Povidone iodine should never be added to lavage fluid,
cutaneous drainage and alcoholization of hepatic abscesses as it has been associated with high mortality and scleros-
in five dogs and one cat obtained favorable results in all six ing, encapsulating peritonitis.122
animals.121
Uroperitoneum presents a specific and urgent challenge Early postoperative enteral nutrition appears to be bene-
because of potential life-threatening hyperkalemia. Every ficial in experimental peritonitis, but a distinct survival ben-
effort should be made to reestablish normal renal function efit has not been demonstrated. Potential benefits include
and urine flow. In cases of bladder rupture, an indwell- increased anastomotic strength and more rapid healing, pos-
ing urinary catheter and a peritoneal dialysis catheter are itive nitrogen balance, and decreased bacterial translocation
placed to drain urine from the bladder and peritoneal cavity, through a compromised GI mucosal barrier.
respectively. Serum potassium and calcium levels and acid– In a rat peritonitis model, early postoperative enteral
base status should be normalized, if possible, before the feeding resulted in a significantly higher nitrogen level,
animal is anesthetized for laparotomy. higher anastomotic bursting strength, and lower TNF-α lev-

FREE
els. TNF-α has the ability to decrease the synthesis of col- three cases (two dogs with sump-Penrose drainage and one
lagen and up-regulate collagenase activity, contributing to with open peritoneal drainage).130
potential anastomotic breakdown and leakage.124 Several studies have reported results of primary closure
In another study,125 mortality in human patients receiv- without the use of abdominal drainage,24,25 open drainage
ing early postoperative enteral nutrition via a jejunostomy compared with primary closure,25,128 and open peritoneal
tube was similar to that in a control group (19.1% and 18.2%, drainage.20–22,25 It is difficult to compare results between
respectively). However, the patients in the study group had studies because of the heterogeneity of the patient popu-
a positive nitrogen balance by the third postoperative day, lations, the lack of a single standard for patient care, and
whereas those in the control group had a negative nitrogen variability in the surgeons’ preference. None of the three
balance until the end of the study. Furthermore, the patients treatment options (primary closure, open peritoneal drain-
receiving early enteral nutrition had significantly fewer sep- age, or closed suction drainage) seems to have an obvious
tic complications compared with the control group. survival benefit based on the available clinical information
In one veterinary study,36 14 of 23 animals with peritoni- in companion animals. The lack of statistically significant
tis received nutritional support with either total parenteral survival differences in studies that compare peritoneal drain-
nutrition or a feeding tube. Nine of these 14 patients sur- age methods may be associated with small sample sizes but
vived. Although nutritional support was not associated with may also reflect the possibility that other factors (e.g., sever-
outcome in this study, this may have been due in part to ity of sepsis, preoperative and postoperative management)
small group numbers. are more important in determining survival.
Peritoneal Drainage Prognosis

Once the underlying disease process has been treated, the Mortality in 50 dogs with septic peritonitis was reported to
peritoneal cavity lavaged, and the fluid aspirated, the sur- be 68%, regardless of drainage technique.131 A study of 51
geon must decide whether postoperative peritoneal drain- cats with septic peritonitis35 found a mortality of 30% in 23
age is required and, if so, whether the abdomen should be cats that were treated by surgical exploration. Treatment was
left open. There are no clear-cut, objective guidelines for not pursued in the other 28 cats either because the cats died
this decision. Prevailing opinion views the peritoneal cavity or were euthanized before treatment could be attempted,
in the same manner as any other contaminated wound: if or because the extent of disease found during exploratory
substantial contamination remains despite the surgeon’s best surgery was too great.35
efforts, drainage options include open peritoneal drainage Prognostic indicators in dogs and cats with septic perito-
and the placement of a closed suction or sump drain.126,127 nitis have been evaluated in two studies.22,36 In one study,22
Advantages of open peritoneal drainage include effec- survivors had significantly lower preoperative values for
tive removal of excess amounts of peritoneal fluid, easier alanine aminotransferase and γ-glutamyl transferase than
access for reexploration of the peritoneal cavity, and the nonsurvivors. In the other study,36 animals that experienced
creation of an environment unfavorable to anaerobic bacte- hypotension that was not correctable with treatment by IV
ria.127 Complications associated with open peritoneal drain- fluids and those that developed respiratory dysfunction or
age include evisceration of abdominal organs, formation of DIC had a worse prognosis.
intestinal fistulae, visceral adhesion to the peritoneal ban-
dage, nosocomial infection of the peritoneum, excessive Conclusion
fluid loss, and hypoproteinemia with secondary peripheral The clinical syndrome of septic peritonitis presents a thera-
edema.21,22,128 In humans, vacuum-assisted suction is com- peutic challenge. Although prognoses vary, the potential for
monly employed when open peritoneal drainage is used to sepsis and its sequelae makes timely diagnosis and treat-
prevent abdominal compartment syndrome.129 ment essential. More study is needed to identify treatment
Closed-suction drainage is being used in patients with modalities that can be directed at specific targets involved in
septic peritonitis with increasing frequency. A clinical study the inflammatory cascade, but advances in human medicine
found it to be effective for treating generalized peritonitis, are promising.
reporting no clinically significant complications.23 Potential
concerns with any intraabdominal drain include ineffective References
1. Withrow SJ, Black AP. Generalized peritonitis in small animals. Vet Clin North Am
drainage secondary to omental or serosal walling off of the Small Anim Pract 1979;9:363-379.
2. Hosgood GL, Salisbury SK. Pathophysiology and pathogenesis of generalized peri-
drain and nosocomial infection. tonitis. Probl Vet Med 1989;1:159-167.
Sump-Penrose drainage has been compared with open 3. Swann H, Hughes D. Diagnosis and management of peritonitis. Vet Clin North Am
drainage in normal dogs,130 yielding no significant differ- Small Anim Pract 2000;30:603-615.
4. Bercovici B, Michel J, Miller J, Sacks TG. Antimicrobial activity of human perito-
ences in blood chemistry, peritoneal fluid analysis, or neal fluid. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1975;141:885-887.
necropsy findings. Nosocomial infections were cultured in 5. Hosgood G, Salisbury SK, Cantwell HD, et al. Intraperitoneal circulation and drain-

FREE
age in the dog. Vet Surg 1989;18:261-268. 38. Bjorling DE, Crowe DT, Kolata RJ, et al. Penetrating abdominal wounds in dogs and
6. Fry DE. Surgical infection. In: O’Leary JP, ed. The Physiologic Basis of Surgery. cats. JAAHA 1982;18:742-748.
Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2002:231-234. 39. Fullington RJ, Otto CM. Characteristics and management of gunshot wounds in
7. Heemken R, Gandawidjaja L, Hau T. Peritonitis: pathophysiology and local defense dogs and cats: 84 cases (1986-1995). JAVMA 1997;210:658-662.
mechanisms. Hepatogastroenterology 1997;44:927-936. 40. Kirpensteijn J, Fingland RB, Ulrich T, et al. Cholelithiasis in dogs: 29 cases (1980-
8. Kirby BM. Peritoneum and peritoneal cavity. In: Slatter D, ed. Textbook of Small 1990). JAVMA 1993;202:1137-1142.
Animal Surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2003:414-445. 41. Ludwig LL, McLoughlin MA, Graves TK, et al. Surgical treatment of bile peritonitis
9. Dunn DL, Barke RA, Knight NB, et al. Role of resident macrophages, peripheral in 24 dogs and 2 cats: a retrospective study (1987-1994). Vet Surg 1997;25:90-98.
neutrophils, and translymphatic absorption in bacterial clearance from the peritoneal 42. Holt DE, Mehler S, Mayhew PD, et al. Canine gallbladder infarction: 12 cases
cavity. Infect Immun 1985;49:257-264. (1993-2003). Vet Pathol 2004;41:416-418.
10. Heel KA, Hall JC. Peritoneal defences and peritoneum-associated lymphoid tissue. 43. Mehler SJ, Bennet RA. Canine extrahepatic biliary tract disease and surgery. Com-
Br J Surg 1996;83:1031-1036. pend Contin Educ Pract Vet 2006;28:302-314.
11. Hall JC, Heel KA, Papadimitriou JM, et al. The pathobiology of peritonitis. Gastro- 44. Mehler SJ, Mayhew PD, Drobatz KJ, et al. Variables associated with outcome
enterology 1998;114:185-196. in dogs undergoing extrahepatic biliary surgery: 60 cases (1988-2002). Vet Surg
12. Gandawidjaja L, Hau T. Anatomic, physiologic, bacteriologic and immunologic as- 2004;33:644-649.
pects of peritonitis. Acta Chir Belg 1997;97:163-167. 45. Edwards DF, Bauer MS, Walker MA. Pancreatic masses in seven dogs following
13. Nimah M, Brilli RJ. Coagulation dysfunction in sepsis and multiple organ system acute pancreatitis. JAAHA 1990;26:189-198.
failure. Crit Care Clin 2003;19:441-458. 46. Grooters AM, Sherding RG, Johnson SE. Hepatic abscesses in dogs. Compend
14. Echtenacher B, Freudenber MA, Jack RS. Differences in innate defense mechanisms Contin Educ Pract Vet 1995;17:833-840.
in endotoxemia and polymicrobial septic peritonitis. Infect Immun 2001;69:7271- 47. Farrar ET, Washabau RJ, Saunders HM. Hepatic abscesses in dogs: 14 cases
7276. (1982-1994). JAVMA 1996;208:243-247.
15. Johnson CC, Baldessarre J, Levison ME. Peritonitis: update on pathophysiology, 48. Schwarz LA, Pennick DG, Leveille-Webster C. Hepatic abscesses in 13 dogs: a re-
clinical manifestations, and management. Clin Infect Dis 1997;24:1035-1047. view of the ultrasonographic findings, clinical data and therapeutic options. Vet Radiol
16. Laroche M, Harding G. Primary and secondary peritonitis: an update. Eur J Clin Ultrasound 1998;39:357-365.
Microbiol Infect Dis 1998;17:542-550. 49. Sergeeff JS, Armstrong PJ, Bunch SE. Hepatic abscesses in cats: 14 cases (1985-
17. Seim HB. Management of peritonitis. In: Bonagura JD, Kirk RW, eds. Current Vet- 2002). J Vet Intern Med 2004;18:295-300.
erinary Therapy XII: Small Animal Practice. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1995:933- 50. McConkey S, Briggs C, Solano M, et al. Liver torsion and associated bacterial peri-
937. tonitis in a dog. Can Vet J 1997;38:438-439.
18. Gaskell R, Dawson S. FIP-related disease. In: Ettinger SJ, Feldman EC, eds. Text- 51. Spangler WL, Culbertson MR. Prevalence, type, and importance of splenic dis-
book of Veterinary Internal Medicine. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2000:137-139. eases in dogs: 1,480 cases (1985-1989). JAVMA 1992;200:829-834.
19. Wright KN, Gompf RE, DeNovo RC. Peritoneal effusion in cats: 65 cases (1981- 52. Spangler WL, Culbertson MR. Prevalence and type of splenic diseases in cats: 455
1997). JAVMA 1999;214:375-381. cases (1985-1991). JAVMA 1992;201:773-776.
20. Woolfson JM, Dulisch ML. Open abdominal drainage in the treatment of general- 53. Fransson BA, Ragle CA. Canine pyometra: an update on pathogenesis and treat-
ized peritonitis in 25 dogs and cats. Vet Surg 1986;15:27-32. ment. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 2003;25:602-611.
21. Greenfield CL, Walshaw R. Open peritoneal drainage for treatment of contami- 54. Okano S, Tagawa M, Takase K. Relationship of the blood endotoxin concentration
nated peritoneal cavity and septic peritonitis in dogs and cats: 24 cases (1980-1986). and prognosis in dogs with pyometra. J Vet Med Sci 1998;60:1265-1267.
JAVMA 1987;191:100-105. 55. Kenney KJ, Matthiesen DT, Brown NO, et al. Pyometra in cats: 183 cases (1979-
22. Winkler KP, Greenfield CL. Potential prognostic indicators in diffuse peritonitis 1984). JAVMA 1987;191:1130-1132.
treated with open peritoneal drainage in the canine patient. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 56. Mullen HS, Matthiesen DT, Scavelli TD. Results of surgery and postoperative com-
2000;10:259-265. plications in 92 dogs treated for prostatic abscessation by a multiple Penrose drain
23. Mueller MG, Ludwig LL, Barton LJ. Use of closed-suction drains to treat general- technique. JAAHA 1990;26:369-379.
ized peritonitis in dogs and cats: 40 cases (1997-1999). JAVMA 2001;219:789-794. 57. Hardie EM. Peritonitis from urogenital conditions. Probl Vet Med 1989;1:36-49.
24. Lanz OI, Ellison GW, Bellah JR, et al. Surgical treatment of septic peritonitis with- 58. Hardie EM, Rawlings CA, Calvert CA. Severe sepsis in selected small animal surgi-
out abdominal drainage in 28 dogs. JAAHA 2001;37:87-92. cal patients. JAAHA 1986;22:33-41.
25. Staatz AJ, Monnet E, Seim HB. Open peritoneal drainage versus primary closure 59. Aumann M, Worth LT, Drobatz KJ. Uroperitoneum in cats: 26 cases (1986-1995).
for the treatment of septic peritonitis in dogs and cats: 42 cases (1993-1999). Vet JAAHA 1998;34:315-324.
Surg 2002;31:174-180. 60. Malangoni MA. Evaluation and management of tertiary peritonitis. Am Surg
26. Stanton ME, Bright RM. Gastroduodenal ulceration in dogs. J Vet Intern Med 2000;66:157-161.
1989;3:238-244. 61. Broche F, Tellado JM. Defense mechanisms of the peritoneal cavity. Curr Opin Crit
27. Lascelles BDX, Blikslager AT, Fox SM, et al. GI tract perforation in dogs treated with Care 2001;7:105-116.
a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor: 29 cases (2002-2003). JAVMA 2005;227:1112- 62. Buijk SE, Bruining HA. Future directions in the management of tertiary peritonitis.
1117. Intensive Care Med 2002;28:1024-1029.
28. Vonderhaar MA, Salisbury SK. Gastroduodenal ulceration associated with flunixin 63. Kruth SA. Endotoxemia. In: Greene CE, ed. Infectious Diseases of the Dog and Cat.
meglumine administration in three dogs. JAVMA 1993;203:92-95. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1998:222-226.
29. Gfeller RW, Sandors AD. Naproxen-associated duodenal ulcer complicated by 64. Aderem A, Ulevitch RJ. Toll-like receptors in the induction of the innate immune
perforation and bacteria- and barium sulfate-induced peritonitis in a dog. JAVMA response. Nature 2000;406:782-787.
1991;198:644-646. 65. Cohen J. The immunopathogenesis of sepsis. Nature 2002;420:885-891.
30. Reed S. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced duodenal ulceration and 66. Vasselon T, Detmers PA. Toll receptors: a central element in innate immune re-
perforation in a mature Rottweiler. Can Vet J 2002;43:971-972. sponses. Infect Immun 2002;70:1033-1041.
31. Runk A, Kyles AE, Downs MO. Duodenal perforation in a cat following the admin- 67. Evans TJ. The role of macrophages in septic shock. Immunobiology 1996;195:655-
istration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication. JAAHA 1999;35:52-55. 659.
32. Toombs JP, Collins LG, Graves GM, et al. Colonic perforation in corticosteroid- 68. Tomlinson JE, Blikslager AT. Interactions between lipopolysaccharide and the in-
treated dogs. JAVMA 1986;188:145-150. testinal epithelium. JAVMA 2004;224:1446-1452.
33. Allen DA, Smeak DD, Schertel ER. Prevalence of small intestinal dehiscence and 69. Sriskandan S, Cohen J. Gram-positive sepsis. Infect Dis Clin North Am
associated clinical factors: a retrospective study of 121 dogs. JAAHA 1992;28:70-76. 1999;13:397-412.
34. Ralphs SC, Jessen CR, Lipowitz AJ. Risk factors for leakage following intestinal 70. Dinarello CA. Proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines as mediators in
anastomosis in dogs and cats: 115 cases (1991-2000). JAVMA 2003;223:73-77. the pathogenesis of septic shock. Chest 1997;112:321S-329S.
35. Costello MF, Drobatz KJ, Aronson LR, et al. Underlying cause, pathophysiolog- 71. Hansen B. Leukotrienes. J Vet Intern Med 1989;3:59-72.
ic abnormalities, and response to treatment in cats with septic peritonitis: 51 cases 72. Brady CA, Otto CM. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, and mul-
(1990-2001). JAVMA 2004;225:897-902. tiple organ dysfunction. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2001;31:1147-1162.
36. King LG. Postoperative complications and prognostic indicators in dogs and cats 73. Mazzaferro EM, Rudloff E, Kirby R. The role of albumin replacement in the critically
with septic peritonitis: 23 cases (1989-1992). JAVMA 1994;204:407-414. ill veterinary patient. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2002;12:113-124.
37. Davidson EB. Managing bite wounds in dogs and cats. Part I. Compend Contin 74. Bernard GR, Vincent JL, Laterre PF, et al. Efficacy and safety of recombinant hu-
Educ Pract Vet 1998;20:811-820. man activated protein C for severe sepsis. N Engl J Med 2001;344:699-709.

FREE
75. DeLaforcade AM, Freeman LM, Shaw SP, et al. Hemostatic changes in dogs with tion and treatment. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1997;19:193-199.
naturally occurring sepsis. J Vet Intern Med 2003;17:674-679. 104. Greene CE, Watson ADJ. Antibacterial chemotherapy. In: Greene CE, ed. Infec-
76. Karamarkovic A, Radenkovic D, Milic N, et al. Protein C as an early marker of se- tious Diseases of the Dog and Cat. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1998:185-205.
vere septic complications in diffuse secondary peritonitis. World J Surg 2005;29:759- 105. Dow SW. Management of anaerobic infections. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim
765. Pract 1988;18:1167-1181.
77. Zeerleder S, Hack E, Wuillemin WA. Disseminated intravascular coagulation in sep- 106. Eddlestone SM. Drug therapies used in GI disease. Compend Contin Educ Pract
sis. Chest 2005;128:2864-2875. Vet 2002;24:452-467.
78. Moore KE, Murtaugh RJ. Pathophysiologic characteristics of hypovolemic shock. 107. Lefering R, Neugebauer EA. Steroid controversy in sepsis and septic shock: a
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2001;31:1115-1128. meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 1995;23:1294-1303.
79. Day TK. Shock: pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. In: Slatter D, ed. Text- 108. Marik PE, Zaloga GP. Adrenal insufficiency in the critically ill. Chest 2002;122:1784-
book of Small Animal Surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2003:1-17. 1796.
80. Donahue SM, Otto CM. Thromboelastography: a tool for measuring hypercoagula- 109. Koo DJ, Jackman D, Chaudry IH, et al. Adrenal insufficiency during the late stage
bility, hypocoagulability, and fibrinolysis. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2005;15:9-16. of polymicrobial sepsis. Crit Care Med 2001;29:618-622.
81. Karagiannis MH, Reniker AN, Kerl ME, et al. Lactate measurement as an indicator 110. Annane D, Sebille V, Charpentier C, et al. Effect of treatment with low doses of
of perfusion. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 2006;28:287-300. hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone on mortality in patients with septic shock. JAMA
82. De Papp E, Drobatz KJ, Hughes D. Plasma lactate concentration as a predictor of 2002;288:862-871.
gastric necrosis and survival among dogs with gastric dilatation-volvulus: 102 cases 111. Kemppainen RJ. Principles of glucocorticoid therapy in nonendocrine disease. In:
(1995-1998). JAVMA 1999;215:49-52. Bojrab MJ. Current Veterinary Therapy (CVT) IX Small Animal Practice. Philadelphia:
83. Miller SI, Wallace RJ, Musher DM, et al. Hypoglycemia as a manifestation of sepsis. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 1986:954-962.
Am J Med 1980;68:649-654. 112. Ng PC, Lee CH, Bnur FL, et al. A double-blind, randomized, controlled study of
84. Hoffer RE. Peritonitis. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1972;2:189-194. a “stress dose” of hydrocortisone for rescue treatment of refractory hypotension in
85. Smelstoys JA, Davis GJ, Learn AE, et al. Outcome of and prognostic indicators for preterm infants. Pediatrics 2006;117:367-375.
dogs and cats with pneumoperitoneum and no history of penetrating trauma: 54 cases 113. Shangraw RE, Jahoor F, Miyoshi H. Differentiation between septic and postburn
(1988-2002). JAVMA 2004;225:251-255. insulin resistance. Metabolism 1990;38:983-989.
86. Heeren V, Edwards L, Mazzaferro EM. Acute abdomen: diagnosis. Compend Con- 114. Van Den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in criti-
tin Educ Pract Vet 2004;26:350-362. cally ill patients. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1359-1367.
87. Perman V, Osborne CA, Stevens JB. Laboratory evaluation of abnormal body fluids. 115. Tariq M, Moutaery AA, Arshaduddin M, et al. Fluconazole attenuates lung injury
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1974;4:255-268. and mortality in a rat peritonitis model. Intensive Care Med 2003;29:2043-2049.
88. Cowell RL, Tyler RD, Meinkoth JH. Abdominal and thoracic fluid. In: Cowell RL, 116. Davis KM, Hardie EM, Mathews KG, Lascelles BDX. Effect of fluconazole on out-
Tyler RD, Meinkoth JH, eds. Diagnostic Cytology and Hematology of the Dog and Cat. come of septic peritonitis. Proc ACVS Vet Symp 2005:E6.
2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999:142-158. 117. Hosgood G. The omentum—the forgotten organ: physiology and potential surgi-
89. Baker R, Lumsden JH. Pleural and peritoneal fluids. In: Baker R, Lumsden JH, eds. cal applications in dogs and cats. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1990;12:45-50.
Color Atlas of Cytology of the Dog and Cat. St. Louis: Mosby; 2000:159-176. 118. Crowe DT. The serosal patch. Vet Surg 1984;13:29-38.
90. Alleman AR. Abdominal, thoracic, and pericardial effusions. Vet Clin North Am 119. Johnson MD, Mann FA. Treatment for pancreatic abscesses via omentalization
Small Anim Pract 2003;33:89-118. with abdominal closure versus open peritoneal drainage in dogs: 15 cases (1994-
91. Beal M. Approach to the acute abdomen. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2004). JAVMA 2006;228:397-402.
2005;35:384-394. 120. White RAS, Williams JM. Intracapsular prostatic omentalization: a new technique
92. Crowe DT. Diagnostic abdominal paracentesis techniques: clinical evaluation in for management of prostatic abscesses in dogs. Vet Surg 1995;24:390-395.
129 dogs and cats. JAAHA 1984;20:223-230. 121. Zatelli A, Bonfanti U, Zini E. Percutaneous drainage and alcoholization of hepatic
93. Bjorling E, Latimer KS, Rawlings CA, et al. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage before and abscesses in five dogs and a cat. JAAHA 2005;41:34-38.
after abdominal surgery in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1983;44:816-820. 122. Platell C, Papadimitriou JM, Hall JC. The influence of lavage on peritonitis. J Am
94. Connally HE. Cytology and fluid analysis of the acute abdomen. Clin Tech Small Coll Surg 2000;191:672-680.
Anim Pract 2003;18:39-44. 123. Bondar VM, Rago C, Cottone FJ, et al. Chlorhexidine lavage in the treatment of
95. Sapey T, Kabissa D, Fort E, et al. Instant diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peri- experimental intra-abdominal infection. Arch Surg 2000;135:309-314.
tonitis using leukocyte esterase reagent strips: Nephur-Test® vs. MultistixSG®. Liver 124. Khalili TM, Navarro RA, Middleton Y, et al. Early postoperative enteral feeding in-
Int 2005;25:343-348. creases anastomotic strength in a peritonitis model. Am J Surg 2001;182:621-624.
96. Bonczynski JJ, Ludwig LL, Barton LJ, et al. Comparison of peritoneal fluid and pe- 125. Singh G, Ram RP, Khanna SK. Early postoperative enteral feeding in patients
ripheral blood pH, bicarbonate, glucose, and lactate concentration as a diagnostic tool with nontraumatic intestinal perforation and peritonitis. J Am Coll Surg 1998;187:142-
for septic peritonitis in dogs and cats. Vet Surg 2003;32:161-166. 146.
97. Levin GM, Bonczynski JJ, Ludwig LL, et al: Lactate as a diagnostic test for septic 126. Donner GS, Ellison GW. The use and misuse of abdominal drains in small animal
peritoneal effusions in dogs and cats. JAAHA 2004;40:364-371. surgery. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1986;8:705-714.
98. Church EM, Matthiesen DT. Surgical treatment of 23 dogs with necrotizing chole- 127. Hosgood G. Drainage of the peritoneal cavity. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet
cystitis. JAAHA 1988;24:305-310. 1993;15:1605-1616.
99. Rudloff E, Kirby R. The critical need for colloids: administering colloids effectively. 128. Orsher RJ, Rosin E. Open peritoneal drainage in experimental peritonitis in dogs.
Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1998;20:27-43. Vet Surg 1984;13:222-226.
100. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment 129. Gracias VH, Braslow B, Johnson J, et al. Abdominal compartment syndrome in
of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1368-1377. the open abdomen. Arch Surg 2002;137:1298-1300.
101. Kirby R, Rudloff E. The critical need for colloids: maintaining fluid balance. Com- 130. Hosgood G, Salisbury SK, DeNicola DB. Open peritoneal drainage versus sump-
pend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1997;19:473-482. Penrose drainage: clinicopathological effects in normal dogs. JAAHA 1991;27:115-
102. Kristensen AT, Feldman BF. General principles of small animal blood component 121.
administration. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1995;25:1277-1290. 131. Hosgood G, Salisbury SK. Generalized peritonitis in dogs: 50 cases (1975-1986).
103. Harrell K, Parrow J, Dristensen A. Canine transfusion reactions. Part II. Preven- JAVMA 1988;193:1448-1450.

FREE
3 CE
CREDITS CE Test This article qualifies for 3 contact hours of continuing education credit from the Auburn University College of Veterinary
Medicine. To take individual CE tests online and get real-time scores, visit Vetlearn.com. Those who wish to apply this credit to fulfill
state relicensure requirements should consult their respective state authorities regarding the applicability of this program.
1. In dogs and cats, the bacteria that cause b. toxic neutrophils d. treatment of adrenal insufficiency
septic peritonitis most commonly origi- c. mesothelial cells e. promotion of wound healing
nate from the d. macrophages
a. uterus. e. intracellular bacteria 8. The options for surgical management of
b. bladder. septic peritonitis do not include
c. stomach/intestines. 5. When evaluated in a peritoneal effusion, a. omentalization.
d. liver. ________ has not been found to be use- b. serosal patching.
e. spleen. ful in the diagnosis of septic peritonitis c. copious lavage with a balanced electro-
in dogs. lyte solution.
2. Which of the following does not directly a. glucose d. removal of the nidus of infection.
contribute to the intrinsic defense sys- b. lactate e. lavage with iodine.
tem of the peritoneal cavity? c. total nucleated cell count
a. complement d. pH 9. ________ is not a disadvantage of open
b. neutrophils e. cytology peritoneal drainage.
c. macrophages a. Evisceration of abdominal organs
d. mast cells 6. The organism most commonly cultured b. Nosocomial infection
e. fibrinogen from peritoneal effusions in cases of c. Hypoproteinemia
septic peritonitis is d. Increased likelihood of anaerobic
3. What substance is the primary contribu- a. Streptococcus pyogenes. infection
tor to the pathophysiology induced by b. Clostridium perfringens. e. Formation of intestinal fistulae
gram-negative bacteria? c. Escherichia coli.
a. endotoxin d. Enterococcus faecalis. 10. ________ has been associated with a
b. teichoic acid e. Staphylococcus aureus. negative outcome in cases of septic
c. peptidoglycan peritonitis.
d. polysaccharide/hyaluronic acid capsule 7. Which is not a benefit of corticosteroids a. Respiratory dysfunction
e. slime layer in patients with septic peritonitis? b. Open peritoneal drainage
a. decreased vascular permeability c. Anemia
4. The presence of ________ in a perito- b. decreased negative effects of inflam- d. Hypertension
neal effusion is diagnostic for septic matory cytokines such as IL-1 and TNF e. Peritoneal fluid lactate concentration
peritonitis. c. promotion of production of antiinflam- >2 mmol/L
a. red blood cells matory factors such as IL-10

©Copyright 2010 MediMedia Animal Health. This document is for internal purposes only. Reprinting or posting on an external website without written permission from MMAH is a violation of copyright laws.

Septic Peritonitis: CE Article

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Septic Peritonitis: CE Article

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Septic Peritonitis: CE Article

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CE Article 3 CE

David E. Holt, BVSc, DACVS

Vetlearn.com | October 2010 | Compendium: Continuing Education for Veterinarians® E1

E2 Compendium: Continuing Education for Veterinarians® | October 2010 | Vetlearn.com

Severe pancreatitis with abscessation. Ruptured prostatic abscess (arrow).

Biliary Tract Urogenital

Vetlearn.com | October 2010 | Compendium: Continuing Education for Veterinarians® E3

E4 Compendium: Continuing Education for Veterinarians® | October 2010 | Vetlearn.com

As more fluid enters the peritoneal cavity, hypovolemia

Vetlearn.com | October 2010 | Compendium: Continuing Education for Veterinarians® E5

E6 Compendium: Continuing Education for Veterinarians® | October 2010 | Vetlearn.com

Complications are uncommon with these techniques. FIGURE 6

Vetlearn.com | October 2010 | Compendium: Continuing Education for Veterinarians® E7

E8 Compendium: Continuing Education for Veterinarians® | October 2010 | Vetlearn.com

Vetlearn.com | October 2010 | Compendium: Continuing Education for Veterinarians® E9

E10 Compendium: Continuing Education for Veterinarians® | October 2010 | Vetlearn.com

Vetlearn.com | October 2010 | Compendium: Continuing Education for Veterinarians® E11

Peritoneal Drainage Prognosis

E12 Compendium: Continuing Education for Veterinarians® | October 2010 | Vetlearn.com

Vetlearn.com | October 2010 | Compendium: Continuing Education for Veterinarians® E13

E14 Compendium: Continuing Education for Veterinarians® | October 2010 | Vetlearn.com

Vetlearn.com | October 2010 | Compendium: Continuing Education for Veterinarians® E15

You might also like