Ona Vs CIR

Lorenzo Ona v.
CIR, 45 SCRA 74
FACTS:
Petitioners were surviving heirs of Julia Bañales. An action for partition of estate was instituted wherein Oña
was appointed as the administrator. He was also appointed as the guardian of the minor children. No partition
took place however. Instead, the funds and properties were used to increase income. It was invested in many
things. The income derived was then divided equally among the petitioners. This prompted the Commissioner
to hold that there was a formed unregistered partnership and subjected them to corporate income tax.
HELD:
The petitioners pose for our resolution the following questions: (1) Under the facts found by the Court of Tax
Appeals, should petitioners be considered as co-owners of the properties inherited by them from the deceased
Julia Buñales and the profits derived from transactions involving the same, or, must they be deemed to have
formed an unregistered partnership subject to tax under Sections 24 and 84(b) of the National Internal Revenue
Code? (2) Assuming they have formed an unregistered partnership, should this not be only in the sense that they
invested as a common fund the profits earned by the properties owned by them in common and the loans granted
to them upon the security of the said properties, with the result that as far as their respective shares in the
inheritance are concerned, the total income thereof should be considered as that of co-owners and not of the
unregistered partnership? And (3) assuming again that they are taxable as an unregistered partnership, should
not the various amounts already paid by them for the same years 1955 and 1956 as individual income taxes on
their respective shares of the profits accruing from the properties they owned in common be deducted from the
deficiency corporate taxes, herein involved, assessed against such unregistered partnership by the respondent
Commissioner?
It is thus incontrovertible that petitioners did not, contrary to their contention, merely limit themselves to holding
the properties inherited by them. Indeed, it is admitted that during the material years herein involved, some of
the said properties were sold at considerable profit, and that with said profit, petitioners engaged, thru Lorenzo
T. Oña, in the purchase and sale of corporate securities. It is likewise admitted that all the profits from these
ventures were divided among petitioners proportionately in accordance with their respective shares in the
inheritance. In these circumstances, it is Our considered view that from the moment petitioners allowed not only
the incomes from their respective shares of the inheritance but even the inherited properties themselves to be
used by Lorenzo T. Oña as a common fund in undertaking several transactions or in business, with the intention
of deriving profit to be shared by them proportionally, such act was tantamount to actually contributing such
incomes to a common fund and, in effect, they thereby formed an unregistered partnership within the purview
of the above-mentioned provisions of the Tax Code. It is but logical that in cases of inheritance, there should be
a period when the heirs can be considered as co owners rather than unregistered co-partners within the
contemplation of our corporate tax laws aforementioned.
Before the partition and distribution of the estate of the deceased, all the income thereof does belong commonly
to all the heirs, obviously, without them becoming thereby unregistered co-partners, but it does not necessarily
follow that such status as co-owners continues until the inheritance is actually and physically distributed among
the heirs, for it is easily conceivable that after knowing their respective shares in the partition, they might decide
to continue holding said shares under the common management of the administrator or executor or of anyone
chosen by them and engage in business on that basis. Withal, if this were to be allowed, it would be the easiest
thing for heirs in any inheritance to circumvent and render meaningless Sections 24 and 84(b) of the National
Internal Revenue Code.

Ona Vs CIR

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ona Vs CIR

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ona Vs CIR

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Lorenzo Ona v.

You might also like