Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 167 views

    Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-313874652
    The document is a rubric for assessing Genius Hour projects. It evaluates projects across several criteria including planning and organization, content, creativity, product, stretch, writing style and conventions, and presentation. For each criteria there are descriptors for performance at a 4 (highest), 3, 2, and 1 (lowest) level.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-313874652
    167 views1 page
    The document is a rubric for assessing Genius Hour projects. It evaluates projects across several criteria including planning and organization, content, creativity, product, stretch, writing style and conventions, and presentation. For each criteria there are descriptors for performance at a 4 (highest), 3, 2, and 1 (lowest) level.

    Original Title

    rubric

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document is a rubric for assessing Genius Hour projects. It evaluates projects across several criteria including planning and organization, content, creativity, product, stretch, writing style and conventions, and presentation. For each criteria there are descriptors for performance at a 4 (highest), 3, 2, and 1 (lowest) level.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    167 views1 page

    Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-313874652
    The document is a rubric for assessing Genius Hour projects. It evaluates projects across several criteria including planning and organization, content, creativity, product, stretch, writing style and conventions, and presentation. For each criteria there are descriptors for performance at a 4 (highest), 3, 2, and 1 (lowest) level.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    Name _____________________________

    Genius Hour Project Assessment Rubric


    Criteria 4 3 2 1
    Planning & Project showed Project showed Project planning Project was __ x3=___
    Organization extensive adequate planning & organization poorly planned or (max. 12 pts.)
    planning & & organization. was lacked
    organization inconsistent. organization.
    throughout.

    Content Advanced & Shows Shows some Shows little


    shows deep understanding of understanding understanding of __ x5= ___
    understanding the topic. of topic. topic. Project (max. 20 pts.)
    beyond grade Related to Partially does not address
    level. On track Inquiry Question. related to Inquiry Question
    with Inquiry Inquiry
    Question. Question.

    Creativity Strong evidence Evidence of Some evidence Little evidence ___ x3=____
    of divergent divergent of divergent of divergent (max 12 pts.)
    thinking thinking thinking in thinking in
    throughout throughout project. project
    project. project.

    Product Is highly Is engaging, Some parts are Is not engaging, ___ x4=____
    engaging, professional, & engaging, professional, or (max 16 pts.)
    professional, & interesting to the professional, & interesting to
    interesting to the audience. interesting to the audience
    audience. the audience.

    Stretch Product is a big Product is a Product is a Product is not a ___x2=____


    stretch- stretch- many stretch-a few stretch-NO new _
    completely new to new elements for new elements elements for (max 8 pts.)
    student! student! for student! student!
    Writing Exceptionally well -Writing is good! Writing is Some writing is
    Style & written! satisfactory fair. __ x3= ___
    Very few errors! Some errors. Multiple errors. -Important (max. 12 pts.)
    Conventions
    Great job on Good job editing. Needs more points
    editing. editing. incomplete.
    Poor
    proofreading &
    editing
    Presentation Speaker was Speaker was Speaker was Speaker was
    clear & confident. usually clear & sometimes clear unclear &/or not __ x5=___
    Presentation fit confident. &/or confident. confident. (max. 20
    allotted time. Presentation fit Presentation Presentation pts.)
    Audience was allotted time. almost fit didn’t fit
    highly considered Audience was allotted time. allotted time.
    considered Audience was Audience was
    considered. not considered.

    You might also like