Do Your Takeoff Homework Runway Length Matters: Understanding The Potential Hazards of Intersection Takeoffs
Do Your Takeoff Homework Runway Length Matters: Understanding The Potential Hazards of Intersection Takeoffs
Do Your Takeoff Homework Runway Length Matters: Understanding The Potential Hazards of Intersection Takeoffs
071
SAFETY
ALERT September 2017
HIGHWAY
U
nderstanding the Potential Hazards of RAILROAD
Intersection Takeoffs
PIPELINE
The problem
Typically used to save time, intersection takeoffs are a common practice in aviation, especially in
general aviation operations. However, pilots may not fully understand the potential risks associated
with conducting intersection takeoffs.
If an aircraft experiences a problem while conducting an intersection takeoff, the available runway
remaining to abort the takeoff or perform an emergency landing is reduced or eliminated, resulting in
greater risk of injury or aircraft damage.
Related accidents
The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has investigated several accidents involving pilots
who were conducting intersection takeoffs, including the following:
Instead of using the full runway length of 6,179 ft for
takeoff, the pilot of a Monnett Sonex experimental am-
ateur-built airplane chose to conduct an intersection
takeoff with about 2,570 ft of available runway. Short-
ly after takeoff, the airplane lost engine power and
impacted parked vehicles near the departure end of
the runway during the pilot’s attempt to turn back for
an emergency landing (figure 1 shows the airplane’s
takeoff and flightpath). Had the pilot used the entire
runway for takeoff, there likely would have been suffi-
cient available runway remaining to land the airplane
following the loss of engine power. (CEN15FA249)
Figure 1. Map showing Monnett Sonex airplane’s flightpath
A sport pilot of a Luscombe 8A and his flight
instructor initiated takeoff from a runway intersection,
eliminating nearly 700 ft of usable runway. About
100 ft above the runway, the engine lost partial power.
With insufficient runway remaining on which to land
and obstacles at the end of the runway that made a
straight-ahead, off-airport landing hazardous, the flight
instructor attempted to maneuver toward the ramp
area adjacent to the runway. The airplane experienced
an aerodynamic stall, impacted the runway in a nose-
down attitude, and came to rest inverted (figure 2
shows the main wreckage). In addition, the airplane
was 68 pounds over its maximum gross weight and Figure 2. Main wreckage of Luscombe 8A
density altitude was over 2,000 ft, which affected the
airplane’s performance. The flight instructor sustained
serious injuries and the sport pilot sustained fatal
injuries. (ERA12FA491)
For schedule expedience, the pilot of a
Piper PA-32 airplane, operated as a 14
Code of Federal Regulations Part 135
flight, chose to conduct an intersection
takeoff using 5,550 ft of an 8,700-ft-long
runway (figure 3 shows an overview of
the runway environment). After takeoff,
the airplane experienced a partial loss
of engine power. The airplane stalled at
a low altitude during the pilot’s attempt
to return to the runway and impacted
airport property. One passenger died, five
sustained serious injuries, and one person
sustained minor injuries. Based on the
accident flightpath, the additional 3,150 ft
of runway likely would have been sufficient
to enable a straight-ahead landing on the
runway after the power loss rather than a
Figure 3. Runway overview
turnback. (WPR13LA045)
The FAA’s “Airplane Flying Handbook” (FAH-H-8083-3B), chapter 5, “Takeoffs and Departure Climbs,” provides
guidance regarding proper takeoff procedures. Takeoffs may seem simple but often present the most hazards of
any phase of flight.
The FAA’s “Pilot’s Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge” (FAA-H-8083-25B), chapter 2, “Aeronautical Decision-
Making,” provides pilots a systematic approach to determine the best course of action in response to a given set
of circumstances.
An article in the July 2004 issue of Flight Training Magazine, an Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association publication,
discusses the importance of alerting potentially conflicting traffic of the intent to conduct an intersection takeoff.
NTSB report AAR-08/03/SUM discusses a 2006 fatal accident in which a de Havilland DHC-6-100 being operated
as a local parachute operation flight lost power in the right engine shortly after an intersection takeoff.
A companion video to this safety alert can be accessed from the Aviation Safety Alerts link.
The reports for the accidents referenced in this safety alert are accessible by NTSB accident number from the
Aviation Accident Database link, and each accident’s public docket is accessible from the Accident Dockets link
for the Docket Management System. Safety Alert Prevent Aerodynamic Stalls at Low Altitude (SA-019) can be
accessed from the Aviation Safety Alerts link.
www.twitter.com/ntsb
The NTSB’s Aviation Information Resources web page, www.ntsb.gov/air,
www.facebook.com/ntsbgov
provides convenient access to NTSB aviation safety products. This Safety
www.youtube.com/user/ntsbgov
Alert and others can be accessed from the Aviation Safety Alerts link at
www.instagram.com/ntsbgov
www.ntsb.gov.
www.flickr.com/photos/ntsb
The NTSB is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation
accident in the United States and significant accidents in other modes of transportation—highway, marine,
railroad, and pipeline. The NTSB determines the probable cause of the accidents and issues safety
recommendations aimed at preventing future accidents. For more information, visit www.ntsb.gov.