Government of Nepal: District Transport Master Plan (DTMP)
Government of Nepal: District Transport Master Plan (DTMP)
Government of Nepal: District Transport Master Plan (DTMP)
District Transport
Master Plan (DTMP)
Ministry of Federal Affairs
and Local Development
Department of Local Infrastructure
Development and Agricultural
Roads (DoLIDAR)
District Development Committee,
Bajura
Volume I: Main Report
April, 2013
Prepared by the North Star Engineering Consultant (P) Ltd for the District Development Committee
(DDC) and District Technical Office (DTO), Bajura with Technical Assistance from the Department of
Local Infrastructure Development and Agricultural Roads (DoLIDAR), Ministry of Federal Affairs and
Local Development and grant supported by DFID.
FOREWORD
i
PREFACES/ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The District Transport Master Plan of Bajura District has been prepared for RTI sector
maintenance Pilot, DoLIDAR under the Contract Agreement between RTI sector
Maintenance Pilot and North Star Engineering Consultant (P) Ltd, contract no. RTI
sector_DTMP/001/012 to carry out the task of updating / preparing of DTMP of Bajura district
of Nepal.
We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the Project Co-ordinator Mr. Ganga
Bhadur. Basnet (SDE), and Er. Manoj Kumar Sherestha of RTI sector whose valuable co-
operation and suggestions guided us to accomplish the agreed task to this level. Account
and Administrative personnel of the project are also thankful for their liberal cooperation in
the financial and administrative dealings. We would also like to convey our sincere thanks to
LDO of Bajura DDC, Mr Bishnu Bdr. Ghimere, DTO Chief Mr. Ganesh Kumar Giri, Planning
officer of Bajura DDC Mr. Ram Bdr. Sahi, Engineers, Sub-engineer and other staffs of DDC
and DTO, Bajura for their extended help and regular support and coordination at different
levels while working at the field level.
The local leaders and local people from Bajura district are also thankful for their help and
suggestion for the selection and identification of the District Core Road Network. We hope,
this updated / prepared DTMP of Bajura District will be very helpful and a valuable guideline
for the planning and development of effective and systematic transport network in Bajura
District.
_____________________
Dhurba Raj Tripathi
On behalf of
North Star Engineering Consultant Pvt. Ltd
ii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Bajura District is located in Seti Zone of the Far-western Development Region of Nepal. It
borders with Mugu and Kalikot district to the East, Bhajang district to the West, Humla to the
North and Accham to the South. The district with Martadi as Headquarters has 27 VDCs, 9
Ilakas and 1 constituency areas. The district has total area of 2,188 km² and had a
population of 134,912 in 2011 census. Geographically the district is divided in three distinct
regions from north to south viz. Higher Himalayan Region, Higher Mountain and mid –
Mountains.
The district inventory identified just over 147 km of roads, including 94km of strategic roads
and 53km of rural roads. In coordination with the DTICC and DDC, 9 rural roads with a length
of 52km were identified as making up the district road core network (DRCN), and the
remaining 1.5km were classified as village roads. The existing DRCN roads link up only 7 of
the 27 VDC headquarters. All of the DRCN roads are earthen fair-weather roads.
Annual conservation costs are estimated at NPR 1.559 million based on the first year, and
will be updated in the ARMP based on actual annual maintenance needs as determined in
the annual road condition survey. For the full five-year period the conservation costs will
come to NPR 7.794 million. An analysis of the road network, identified the need for
improvement, of all the DRCN roads in order to bring them to a maintainable all-weather
standard and provide them with a proper road surface in light of existing traffic volumes.
Since, the traffic volume is very low and also the SRN within the district is still not all weather,
the major improvement in this DTMP has not been focused except the minor cross drainage
and retaining structure work. Although, the existing DRCN demand major cross drainage
structure 660m bridges for all weather improvement, due the lack of available budget and
very low traffic volume budget has not been allocated for construction of bridges as it
requires high construction cost. However, the required improvements and their estimated
costs are listed below.
.
Improvement type Requirement Cost (NPR)
Bridges 660 m ‐
Slab culverts 0 m ‐
Causeways 90 m 900,000
Hume pipes 15 units 150,000
3
Masonry retaining walls 430 m 4,300,000
Gabion retaining walls 3567.5 m3 8,918,750
Lined drains 0 m ‐
Widening 0 m ‐
Rehabilitation 0 km ‐
Gravelling 0 km ‐
Blacktopping 0 km ‐
New construction 143.10 km 572,400,000
Total 586,668,750
iii
The available budget for the road sector for the coming five years (fiscal year 2070/71 to
2074/75) is estimated to be NPR 230.162 million. Allocation to the district road core network
was set at 95% of the total road sector budget, which was subsequently allocated firstly to
the annual maintenance needs, secondly to the improvement needs and lastly to new
construction. This budget is insufficient to cover all the estimated costs of conservation,
improvement and new construction. However, it allows all conservation requirements to be
covered throughout the DTMP period and almost all selected improvement works to be
completed before the end of the DTMP period. The remaining improvement works will be
carried out in the next DTMP. All new construction is not possible within this DTMP period
and will also be carried out under the next DTMP.
Within the DTMP period no roads will be gravelled nor blacktopped. The main concentration
of this DTMP will be new DRCN construction connecting VDC headquarters to district
headquarters or SRN to provide minimum level of access to at least fair weather standard.
At present the number of VDC headquarters with access to the SRN is only 5 with 26%
population and DRCN is 2 with 9% population. Moreover, 21 VDC with 71% population has
no access to SRN or DRCN. Thus, at the end of DTMP, additional 16 number of VDC will
have access to fair-weather DRCN, increasing population from 9% to 73%. The number of
VDC headquarters with no access to DRCN roads will remain at 7, while the percentage of
the district population with no access to DRCN roads will reduce at 22%.
iv
ABBREVIATIONS
v
CONTENTS
FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................. i
prefaces/Acknowledgement .................................................................................................. ii
Executive summary............................................................................................................... iii
Abbreviations ......................................................................................................................... v
CONTENTS............................................................................................................................. vi
1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1
2. District road core network (DRCN) .................................................................................. 3
2.1 Total road network ........................................................................................................ 3
2.2 National Highways and Feeder Roads ......................................................................... 3
2.3 District Road Core Network .......................................................................................... 3
2.4 Village roads ................................................................................................................. 4
3. District Transport Perspective Plan (DTPP) .................................................................... 7
3.1 Conservation................................................................................................................. 7
3.2 Improvement ................................................................................................................. 8
3.3 New construction ........................................................................................................ 10
3.4 District Transport Perspective Plan ............................................................................ 11
4. Cost estimation ................................................................................................................ 14
4.1 Conservation............................................................................................................... 14
4.2 Improvement ............................................................................................................... 15
4.3 New construction ........................................................................................................ 15
4.4 DTPP costs ................................................................................................................. 16
5. Ranking............................................................................................................................. 17
5.1 Conservation............................................................................................................... 17
5.2 Improvement ............................................................................................................... 17
5.3 New construction ........................................................................................................ 18
6. District Transport Master Plan (DTMP) .......................................................................... 19
6.1 Five Year Projected Financial resources .................................................................... 19
6.2 Budget allocation ........................................................................................................ 19
6.3 DTMP outputs ............................................................................................................. 21
6.4 DTMP outcome ........................................................................................................... 21
Annex 1 Traffic data ............................................................................................................ 23
Annex 2 Population served ................................................................................................ 24
Annex 3 Location of proposed interventions ................................................................... 26
vi
TABLES
Table 2.1.1 Total road length in Bajura Distict(km) .............................................................. 3
Table 2.2.1 National Highways and Feeder Roads in Bajura District (km) .......................... 3
Table 2.3.1 Total Road Length in Bajura District (km) ......................................................... 4
Table 2.3.2 District Road core network in Bajura District (km) ...................................... 4
Table 3.1.1 Conservation requirements ............................................................................... 8
Table 3.2.1 Sections of the district road core network requiring rehabilitation..................... 8
Table 3.2.2 Sections of the district road core network requiring gravelling.......................... 9
Table 3.2.3 Required cross drainage structures .................................................................. 9
Table 3.2.4 Required protective structures ........................................................................ 10
Table 3.2.5 Sections of the district road core network requiring widening ......................... 10
Table 3.2.6 Sections of the district road core network requiring blacktopping ................... 10
Table 3.3.1 Sections of the district road core network requiring new construction.. 11
Table 3.4.1 District Transport Perspective Plan ................................................................ 12
Table 4.1.1 Standard unit costs for conservation .............................................................. 14
Table 4.1.2 Estimated conservation costs for the first year (NPR ‘000) ............................ 14
Table 4.2.1 Standard unit costs for improvement activities ............................................... 15
Table 4.2.2 Cost estimate for improvement measures (NPR ‘000) ................................... 15
Table 4.3.1 Standard unit costs for new construction ........................................................ 15
Table 4.3.2 Cost estimate for new construction (NPR ‘000) .............................................. 16
Table 4.4.1 DTPP costs (NPR ‘000) .................................................................................. 16
Table 5.1.1 Ranking of conservation works (NPR ‘000) .................................................... 17
Table 5.2.1 Ranking of improvement works (NPR ‘000) .................................................... 18
Table 5.3.1 Ranking of construction works (NPR ‘000) ..................................................... 18
Table 6.1.1 Estimated funding levels (roads) for next five years (in NPR ‘000)................. 19
Table 6.2.1 DTMP investment plan ................................................................................... 20
Table 6.3.1 DTMP output ................................................................................................... 21
Table 6.4.1 Standard of DRCN roads ................................................................................ 21
Table 6.4.2 Population with access to road network ......................................................... 21
FIGURES
Figure 1 Map of Nepal indicating Bajura District ................................................................. 1
Figure 2 Total Road Inventory ............................................................................................ 5
Figure 3 District Road Core Network (DRCN) .................................................................... 6
Figure 4 District Transport Perspective Plan (DTPP) ....................................................... 13
Figure 5 District Road sector budget allocation ................................................................ 19
Figure 6 District Transport Master Plan (DTMP)............................................................... 22
vii
1. INTRODUCTION
Bajura District, a part of Seti Zone, of Far western Region (Sudur Pashchimanchal), is one of
the seventy-five districts of Nepal, a landlocked country of South Asia. The district,
with Martadi as its district headquarters, covers an area of 2,188 km² and had a population of
134,912 in 2011 census. The district has 27 VDCs, 9 Ilakas and 1 constituency areas. The
district is situated in Longitude between 81º 10’ 20” to 81º 48’ 27” East and Latitude 29º 16’
21” to 29º 56’ 56” North. Geographically the district is divided in three distinct regions from
north to south viz. Higher Himalayan Region, Higher Mountain and mid – Mountains. The
Higher Himalayan region comprises of Saipal Himalayan range; High Mountain region
comprises of Doha Lekh and Ghori Lekh. Similarly, Mid Mountain range comprises different
ranges of mountains e.g. Malika Temple. The annual rainfall is about 13,433 mm and
temperatures vary from 0 ºC to 40 ºC. The livelihood of more than 80% of the district
population depends on agriculture farming, mainly small scale livestock. Due to low level of
agricultural production, the majority of the households face acute food shortages for a large
part of the year.
According to the National Census 2011, the total population of the district is 134,912
comprising 69,106 female (51%) and 65,806 male (49%) residing in 24,908 households.
Bajura district has an average population density of around 62 people per square km. The
average family size is 5.4. Life expectancy of the people is 58 years. The average literacy
rate is about 32%. Bajura district has a multi ethnic composition with Chhetri, Kami, Thakuri,
Brahman, Magar, Damai, Sarki, Newar, Sherpa, Rai kirati and Sanyashi (Giri and Puri). The
common language is Nepali (96%) followed by Bhote Sherpa (0.46%) and Tamang (0.42 %).
1
Although accessibility to Bajura is very poor, this is improving rapidly. The Government
strategy is mainly focused on the connection of VDC headquarters with all weather motor
able roads to SRN or District headquarters. Moreover, the DDC body of Bajura district has
given higher priority on rural roads.
2
2. DISTRICT ROAD CORE NETWORK (DRCN)
This chapter gives an overview of the existing roads in Bajura district, distinguishing between
strategic roads and rural roads. It goes on to identify those rural roads that make up the
district road core network (DRCN) that will form the basis for this DTMP. The remaining rural
roads are classified as village roads.
Table 2.2.1 National Highways and Feeder Roads in Bajura District (km)
The resulting District Road Core Network in Bajura district is shown in Figure 3 at the end of
this chapter. The DRCN consists of 9 district roads with a total length of 52 km. The
remaining 1.50 km of existing rural roads are not considered to be DRCN roads and are
classified as village roads under the responsibility of the VDCs (see also section 2.3). All
DRCN roads are currently earthen roads and are considered fair-weather only (see Error!
Not a valid bookmark self-reference.Table 2.3.1). A complete list of the DRCN roads and
their characteristics is provided in
3
Table 2.3.1 Total Road Length in Bajura District (km)
It is recommended that the VDCs organise maintenance workers to carry out the emergency
and routine/recurrent maintenance of these roads to ensure they remain accessible. Any
upgrading or new construction of village roads falls outside the scope of this DTMP and is
the responsibility of the VDCs.
4
Figure 2 Total Road Inventory
5
Figure 3 District Road Core Network (DRCN)
Surface Type
Code Total length Black New
Gravel Earthern
Top Construction
67DR001 21 ‐ ‐ 4 17
67DR002 12.6 ‐ ‐ 7.3 5
67DR003 11.5 ‐ ‐ 8.2 3
67DR004 11.7 ‐ ‐ 11.7 ‐
67DR005 5.9 ‐ ‐ 5.9 ‐
67DR006 1.5 ‐ ‐ 0.9 0.6
67DR007 16.1 ‐ ‐ 2.4 13.7
67DR008 43.2 ‐ ‐ 7.9 35.2
67DR009 17.2 ‐ ‐ 3.5 13.7
67DR010 7.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ 7.2
67DR011 9.1 ‐ ‐ ‐ 9.1
67DR012 13.7 ‐ ‐ ‐ 13.7
67DR013 4.0 ‐ ‐ ‐ 4.0
67DR014 4.6 ‐ ‐ ‐ 4.6
67DR015 15.8 ‐ ‐ ‐ 15.8
195.0 51.8 143
6
3. DISTRICT TRANSPORT PERSPECTIVE PLAN (DTPP)
This chapter looks at the required interventions regarding conservation, improvement and
new construction of the district road core network. It provides a complete list of all works
required in the DRCN, which together form the District Transport Perspective Plan (DTPP).
For the works forming part of the DTPP, chapter 4 will subsequently provide cost estimation,
while chapter 5 will rank the works according to priority and chapter 6 will select those priority
works that can be carried out in the next 5 years and thus form part of the District Transport
Master Plan (DTMP).
3.1 CONSERVATION
Conservation refers to the actions required to repair a road and keep it in good and passable
condition. For DTMP planning purposes standard costs per kilometre for each maintenance
type are applied to the entire district road core network, whereby for certain maintenance
type’s distinction is made according to the surface type of the road. Identification of the actual
maintenance requirements of each road is made annually in the ARMP. Conservation
activities include:
1. Emergency maintenance - Basic repairs aimed at removing landslides and repairing
damage to the road that inhibit the proper use of the road and make it impassable.
This mainly takes place during and after the rainy season. A provisional lump sum is
reserved for the entire district road core network based on the network length.
Allocation to specific road sections is based on the actual need for clearing landslides
or repairing washouts and cuts in the road.
2. Routine maintenance - General maintenance of the road aimed at preventing damage
by ensuring the proper working of the different road elements (retaining walls,
drainage system, carriageway, etc.) and cutting vegetation. This is carried out each
year on a more or less continuous basis. Routine maintenance is required for the
entire district road core network. The specific requirements for routine maintenance
are determined on an annual basis through the road condition survey and defined in
the ARMP.
3. Recurrent maintenance - Repairs of minor damage to the road surface and road
structures to bring them back to good condition. This is generally carried out once or
twice a year. Recurrent maintenance is required for the entire district road core
network, whereby distinction is made according to the surface type. The specific
requirements for recurrent maintenance are determined on an annual basis through
the road condition survey and defined in the ARMP.
4. Periodic maintenance - Larger repairs to the road largely aimed at renewing the road
surface through regravelling, resealing or overlays. It is generally carried out with
several years interval. Although periodic maintenance is only required for specific
sections of the district road core network, a lump sum allocation is made for the entire
district road core network based on average annual requirements, distinguishing
between different surface types. The specific periodic maintenance requirements are
determined on an annual basis through the annual road condition survey and defined
in the ARMP.
In case of Bajura District, volume of traffic is very low and also the SRN within the district is
still not all weather. Moreover, there are only two DRCN on which traffic ply over and traffic
volume is negligible, thus it doesn’t requires all four type of conservation. Hence, only the
emergency maintenance has been recommended from DTICC and included in this DTMP.
The length of roads to be included under each conservation type for the first year is indicated
below. This is basically the entire district road core network in as far as it does not require
rehabilitation.
7
Table 3.1.1 Conservation requirements
3.2 IMPROVEMENT
Improvement refers to actions required to improve a road to bring it to a maintainable all-
weather standard. It includes the following actions, which for Bajura are described in more
detail in the subsequent sections.
1. Rehabilitation - Significant repairs required to bring a very poor road back to a
maintainable standard. This does not include any changes to the original surface
type.
2. Gravelling - Placement of a gravel layer to make it all-weather and ensure that the
road remains passable during the rainy season.
3. Cross drainage - Placement of suitable cross-drainage structures with the aim of
making the road all-weather and ensuring that the road remains passable even during
the rainy season
4. Protective structures - Placement of retaining walls and lined side drains to avoid
excessive damage to the road during the rainy season and bring it to a maintainable
standard.
5. Blacktopping - Placement of a blacktop layer in roads with traffic volumes exceeding
50 passenger car units (PCU) to reduce damage to the road surface
6. Widening - Increase of the road width in roads with traffic volumes exceeding 500
passenger car units (PCU) to ensure the proper flow of traffic.
3.2.1 REHABILITATION
No rehabilitation needs were identified in the district road core network.
Table 3.2.1 Sections of the district road core network requiring rehabilitation
3.2.2 GRAVELLING
As the entire district road core network needs to be brought to an all-weather status,
gravelling of the road surface is required for all the earthen sections in the DRCN. Since,
there is only two DRCN in district on which vehicle ply over, also the volume of traffic is very
low. Moreover, the SRN is still not all weather, in such situation no DRCN has been
recommended and projected for gravelling. For Bajura this concerns the total of 0 km of
DRCN roads.
8
Table 3.2.2 Sections of the district road core network requiring gravelling
9
Table 3.2.4 Required protective structures
3.2.5 WIDENING
Widening of the district road core network in Bajura is required only in specific locations to
bring it up to the minimum standard and to ensure sufficient space in the curves. Additional
widening to a higher standard is not required because of very low traffic volumes.
Table 3.2.5 Sections of the district road core network requiring widening
3.2.6 BLACKTOPPING
An analysis of the traffic data for the different roads making up the district road core network
(see Annex 1) shows that there are no roads that are eligible for blacktopping (traffic volume
exceeds 50 PCU). The total length for blacktopping is 0 km. The blacktopping of the roads
will be treated as a second phase of improvement after they have been gravelled.
Table 3.2.6 Sections of the district road core network requiring blacktopping
10
Table 3.3.1 Sections of the district road core network requiring new construction
11
Table 3.4.1 District Transport Perspective Plan
Stone Causeway (m)
Masonry walls (m3)
Rehabilitation (km)
Pipe culvert (units)
maintenance (km)
maintenance (km)
maintenance (km)
maintenance (km)
Blacktopping (km)
Gabion walls (m3)
New construction
CC Causeway (m)
Slab culvert (m)
Gravelling (km)
Lined drain (m)
Widening (m)
Emergency
Bridge (m)
Recurrent
Periodic
Routine
(km)
Code
67DR001 4.00 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 15.00 ‐ 80.00 120.00 ‐ 17.00
67DR002 7.35 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 120.00 ‐ ‐ ‐ 3.00 ‐ 270.00 ‐ 5.30
67DR003 8.22 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 120.00 ‐ ‐ 10.00 3.00 ‐ 300.00 ‐ 3.20
67DR004 11.70 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 60.00 ‐ ‐ 30.00 7.00 30.00 720.00 ‐ ‐
67DR005 5.89 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 130.00 ‐ ‐ 15.00 2.00 320.00 757.50 ‐ ‐
67DR006 0.90 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 300.00 ‐ 0.60
67DR007 2.40 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 500.00 ‐ 13.70
67DR008 8.00 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 80.00 ‐ ‐ 10.00 ‐ ‐ 300.00 ‐ 35.20
67DR009 3.50 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 150.00 ‐ ‐ 10.00 ‐ ‐ 300.00 ‐ 13.70
67DR010 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 7.20
67DR011 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9.10
67DR012 13.70
67DR013 4.00
67DR014 4.60
67DR015 15.80
Total 51.96 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 660 ‐ ‐ 90 15 430 3,568 ‐ 143.10
12
Figure 4 District Transport Perspective Plan (DTPP)
Surface Type
Code Total length Black New
Gravel Earthern
Top Construction
67DR001 21 ‐ ‐ 4 17
67DR002 12.6 ‐ ‐ 7.3 5
67DR003 11.5 ‐ ‐ 8.2 3
67DR004 11.7 ‐ ‐ 11.7 ‐
67DR005 5.9 ‐ ‐ 5.9 ‐
67DR006 1.5 ‐ ‐ 0.9 0.6
67DR007 16.1 ‐ ‐ 2.4 13.7
67DR008 43.2 ‐ ‐ 7.9 35.2
67DR009 17.2 ‐ ‐ 3.5 13.7
67DR010 7.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ 7.2
67DR011 9.1 ‐ ‐ ‐ 9.1
67DR012 13.7 ‐ ‐ ‐ 13.7
67DR013 4.0 ‐ ‐ ‐ 4.0
67DR014 4.6 ‐ ‐ ‐ 4.6
67DR015 15.8 ‐ ‐ ‐ 15.8
195.0 51.8 143
13
4. COST ESTIMATION
For the cost estimation, use has been made of standard costs for the different activities
required. For the conservation activities this results in an estimation of annual costs, while for
improvement and new construction activities this result in an estimation of the total costs
required.
4.1 CONSERVATION
The costs of the required conservation measures have been calculated using the following
standard costs. These standard costs have been applied to the entire district road core
network, whereby distinction is made based on the surface type in the case of recurrent and
periodic maintenance. It must be noted here that the standard costs for periodic maintenance
are the average annual costs, but that the cost for applying periodic maintenance in a
specific section every several years will be higher (the cumulative cost of several years). The
estimated costs for the first year are presented below, while the costs for subsequent years
will vary slightly as road surface types change as a result of improvements. Detailed cost
estimations for the actual maintenance needs in any given year will be presented in the
ARMP.
For the first year the estimated costs for conservation of the DRCN come to NPR 1.559
million. Based on this cost for the first year, the costs for conservation of the DRCN for the
next 5 years are estimated at NPR 7.794 million. These costs will change slightly as the
roads are improved and the standard conservation costs change. This will be updated in the
ARMP on an annual basis.
Table 4.1.2 Estimated conservation costs for the first year (NPR ‘000)
Total annual
Emergency
Total length
Total 5‐year
Gravel (km)
(blacktop)
(blacktop)
Recurrent
Recurrent
Recurrent
(earthen)
Routine
Blacktop
Periodic
Periodic
Earthen
(gravel)
(gravel)
(km)
(km)
(km)
cost
cost
Code
14
4.2 IMPROVEMENT
The costs of the required improvement measures have been calculated using the following
standard costs. These standard costs have been applied to the identified improvement
requirements presented in the previous chapter.
The resulting estimated costs come to NPR 14.269 million as indicated in the table below
Masonry walls
Rehabilitation
CC causeways
Blacktopping
Gabion walls
Lined drains
Slab culverts
Total length
Pipe culvert
causeways
Gravelling
Total cost
Widening
Bridges
Stone
(km)
Code
67DR001 4.00 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 150 ‐ 800 300 ‐ 1,250
67DR002 7.35 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 30 ‐ 675 ‐ 705
67DR003 8.22 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 100 30 ‐ 750 ‐ 880
67DR004 11.70 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 300 70 300 1,800 ‐ 2,470
67DR005 5.89 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 150 20 3,200 1,894 ‐ 5,264
67DR006 0.90 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 750 ‐ 750
67DR007 2.40 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,250 ‐ 1,250
67DR008 8.00 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 100 ‐ ‐ 750 ‐ 850
67DR009 3.50 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 100 ‐ ‐ 750 ‐ 850
Total 51.96 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 900 150 4,300 8,919 ‐ 14,269
For new construction, the following standard costs have been applied to estimate the costs
involved.
The resulting estimated costs for new construction come to NPR 572.400 million.
15
Table 4.3.2 Cost estimate for new construction (NPR ‘000)
Length Opening
Code Description Gravelling Bridges Total cost
(km) up
67DR001 Dhap ‐ Khaptad Tourism Road 17.00 68,000 68,000
Barahbise‐ Dhanalta‐Delta‐
67DR002 5.30 21,200 21,200
Lamgaun(Aatichaur) Road
Maure‐ Kailashmandu‐ Badimalika
67DR003 3.20 12,800 12,800
Road
67DR004 Shera ‐ Aatichaur Agriculture Road ‐ ‐ ‐
Martadi‐Majhigaun(Jugada)‐Pinalek‐
67DR005 ‐ ‐ ‐
Aatichaur‐Thamlek Road
67DR006 Pandusain‐ VDC center Link Road 0.60 2,400 2,400
67DR007 Kolti ‐ Kuru‐ Budinanda Tourism Road 13.70 54,800 54,800
Piluchur‐Baddhau‐ Boldhik ‐Kawadi ‐
67DR008 35.20 140,800 140,800
Bichhaiya Road
67DR009 Piluchur‐Jukot ‐ Sappata Road 13.70 54,800 54,800
Padubaula (Gudukhati) ‐ Dogadi VDC
67DR010 7.20 28,800 28,800
Center
67DR011 Maure‐Toli ‐ Chhatra Road 9.10 36,400 36,400
67DR012 Jugada ‐ Manakot ‐Dahakot Road 13.70 54,800 54,800
67DR013 Kolti ‐ kotila VDC center Road 4.00 16,000 16,000
67DR014 Jukot ‐ Wai VDC Link Road 4.60 18,400 18,400
67DR015 Piluchur ‐ Jagnnath ‐ Gortee Road 15.80 63,200 63,200
Total 143.10 572,400 572,400
16
5. RANKING
The ranking of the required interventions determines the order in which they will be carried
out. This ranking is done separately for conservation, improvement and new construction.
Ranking is done according to the cost per person served, whereby the costs are the
estimated costs of the previous chapter. For the calculation of the population served, use is
made of the population data for the VDCs linked by the road concerned. This data is
presented in Annex 2.
5.1 CONSERVATION
Ranking of roads for conservation is based on the total conservation costs per person served
by the road. This ranking of roads will be updated each year in the ARMP based on the
actual cost estimates for the year concerned. An example ranking is provided in the table
below based on standard costs for the first year.
3. Recurrent
4. Recurrent
5. Recurrent
Cost/person
Total length
(NPR '000)
Population
6. Periodic
7. Periodic
2. Routine
Total cost
(blacktop)
(paved)
(gravel)
(gravel)
(earth)
served
(NPR)
(km)
Code
67DR006 0.90 27 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 27 6,751 4
67DR001 4.00 120 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 120 14,086 9
67DR007 2.40 72 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 72 7,134 10
67DR002 7.35 221 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 221 20,376 11
67DR009 3.50 105 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 105 9,401 11
67DR005 5.89 177 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 177 14,165 12
67DR003 8.22 247 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 247 16,458 15
67DR008 8.00 240 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 240 15,107 16
67DR004 11.70 351 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 351 10,708 33
The allocation of maintenance funding will follow a specific sequence indicated below, and
will be applied to the road ranking as defined in the ARMP. This will be of particular
importance where funding is insufficient to cover all conservation costs.
1. Emergency maintenance
2. Routine maintenance
3. Recurrent maintenance paved roads
4. Recurrent maintenance gravel roads
5. Recurrent maintenance Earthen roads
6. Periodic maintenance blacktop roads
7. Periodic maintenance gravel roads
5.2 IMPROVEMENT
In the case of improvement activities, ranking is again based on the basis of the total cost per
person served. The resulting order of the roads is shown in the table below. In the case of
roads requiring blacktopping, the improvement of the road has been split into two phases.
The first phase includes all improvements to bring the road to a maintainable all-weather
standard (gravelling, widening, cross drainage and protective structures), while the second
phase only includes the blacktopping. This has been done to avoid unnecessarily delaying
17
the improvement of such roads to all-weather gravel standard due to the additional cost of
blacktopping (increasing the cost per person served).
18
6. DISTRICT TRANSPORT MASTER PLAN (DTMP)
The District Transport Master Plan (DTMP) that covers the next five years is prepared based
on the projected financial resources available and the prioritized transport interventions as
listed in the DTPP. Year-wise targets are prepared for the different roads and intervention
types.
Table 6.1.1 Estimated funding levels (roads) for next five years (in NPR ‘000)
95% 5%
District Road Core Network Village roads
DTMP
1. Conservation
of DRCN roads
For village
2. Improvement roads
of DRCN roads
3. New construction
of DRCN roads
ARMP
19
Based on this distribution of the estimated budget, the available annual budget for each
intervention type and the resulting district road core network length by surface type can be
calculated. The results are shown in the following table.
Item Year
Fiscal year 2070/71 2071/72 2072/73
2073/74 2074/75
Total budget 37,700 41,470 45,61750,179 55,197
Non‐DRCN roads 1,885 2,074 2,281 2,509 2,760
DRCN budget 35,815 39,397 43,33647,670 52,437
Core network length (km) 51.96 51.96 51.96 51.96 51.96
Blacktop (km) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Gravel (km) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Earthen (km) 51.96 51.96 51.9651.96 51.96
Conservation (NPR ‘000) 1,559 1,559 1,5591,559 1,559
Emergency 1,559 1,559 1,559 1,559 1,559
Routine
Recurrent (blacktop)
Recurrent (gravel)
Recurrent (earthen)
Periodic (blacktop) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Periodic (gravel) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Improvement Cost BT GR 34,256 BT GR 37,838 BT GR 41,777 BT GR 46,111 BT GR 50,878 BT GR
67DR002 705 ‐ ‐ 705 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
67DR003 880 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 880 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
67DR008 850 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 850 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
67DR001 1,250 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,250 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
67DR009 850 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 850 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
67DR006 750 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 750 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
67DR007 1,250 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,250 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
67DR004 2,470 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,470 ‐ ‐
67DR005 5,264 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5,264 ‐ ‐
Total improvement 705 ‐ ‐ 1,730 ‐ ‐ 2,100 ‐ ‐ 2,000 ‐ ‐ 7,734 ‐ ‐
New Construction Cost ER 33,551 ER 36,108 ER 39,677 ER 44,111 ER 43,144 ER
67DR004 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
67DR005 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
67DR006 2,400 0.60 2,400 0.60 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
67DR003 12,800 3.20 12,800 3.20 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
67DR002 21,200 5.30 18,351 4.59 2,849 0.71 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
67DR013 16,000 4.00 ‐ 16,000 4.00 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
67DR011 36,400 9.10 ‐ 8,400 2.10 28,000 7.00 ‐ ‐ ‐
67DR014 18,400 4.60 ‐ 8,859 2.21 9,500 2.38 ‐ ‐
67DR010 28,800 7.20 ‐ ‐ 2,177 0.54 20,000 5.00 ‐
67DR012 54,800 13.70 ‐ ‐ ‐ 24,111 6.03 ‐
67DR001 68,000 17.00 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 26,000 6.50
67DR015 63,200 15.80 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 17,144 4.29
67DR009 54,800 13.70 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
67DR007 54,800 13.70 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
67DR008 140,800 35.20 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
143.1
Total new construction = 49.15 km 33,551 8.39 36,108 9.03 39,677 9.92 44,111 11.03 43,144 10.79
20
6.3 DTMP OUTPUTS
Based on the investment plan presented above, all DRCN roads (51.96km) will be conserved
for the duration of the DTMP period. All of these roads will also receive the cross drainage
and protective structures required to make them maintainable fair-weather roads. Due to low
road density and less traffic volume all the existing earthen roads will not be improved to
grave standard at the end of the DTMP period and will be improved in the next DTMP. The
same goes for the new construction which will only take place after the existing DRCN roads
have been improved to maintainable all weather standards (some of these roads may be
constructed using VDC funding).
Of the total DTMP budget, NPR 7.794 million will be spent on conservation; NPR 14.269
million on improvements and NPR 196.591 million. This will use up the entire DTMP budget
for the five-year period.
Total
Fair‐weather All‐weather gravel All‐weather blacktop
length
km km % km % km %
Start of DTMP 51.96 51.96 100% ‐ 0% ‐ 0%
End of DTMP 51.96 51.96 100% ‐ 0% ‐ 0%
Difference ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ 0%
The number of VDC headquarters with access to the SRN is 5 with 26% population.
Similarly, the number of VDC with access to fair-weather DRCN roads will increase from 2 to
18 and the district population with access to the fair-weather DRCN roads will increase from
9% to 73%. The number of VDC headquarters with no access to DRCN roads will remain at
7, while the percentage of the district population with no access to DRCN roads will remain at
22%.
Population
Population
Population
VDCs
VDCs
VDCs
VDCs
%
%
%
%
Start of DTMP 5 34,526 26% 21 95,351 71% 2 12,651 9% 0 ‐ 0%
End of DTMP 5 34,526 26% 7 29,714 22% 18 97,857 73% 0 ‐ 0%
‐ ‐
Difference ‐ ‐ 0% ‐49% 16 85,206 64% ‐ ‐ 0%
14 65,637
21
Figure 6 District Transport Master Plan (DTMP)
Surface Type
Code Total length New
Black Top Gravel Earthern
Construction
67DR001 10.5 ‐ ‐ 4.0 6.5
67DR002 12.6 ‐ ‐ 7.3 5.3
67DR003 11.4 ‐ ‐ 8.2 3.2
67DR006 1.6 ‐ ‐ 0.9 0.7
67DR010 5.5 ‐ ‐ ‐ 5.5
67DR011 9.1 ‐ ‐ ‐ 9.1
67DR012 6.0 ‐ ‐ ‐ 6.0
67DR013 4.0 ‐ ‐ ‐ 4.0
67DR014 4.6 ‐ ‐ ‐ 4.6
67DR015 4.3 ‐ ‐ ‐ 4.3
69.7 20.4 49.3
Outcome road length
Total length Fair‐weather All‐weather gravel All‐weather blacktop
km km % km % km %
Start of DTMP 51.96 51.96 100% ‐ 0% ‐ 0%
End of DTMP 51.96 51.96 100% ‐ 0% ‐ 0%
Difference ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 0% ‐ 0%
Outcome access
Direct access to SRN No access to road Fair‐weather core roads All‐weather core roads
VDCs Population % VDCs Population % VDCs Population % VDCs Population %
Start of DTMP 5 34,526 26% 21 95,351 71% 2 12,651 9% 0 ‐ 0%
End of DTMP 5 34,526 26% 7 29,714 22% 18 97,857 73% 0 ‐ 0%
Difference ‐ ‐ 0% ‐ 14 ‐ 65,637 ‐49% 16 85,206 64% ‐ ‐ 0%
22
ANNEX 1 TRAFFIC DATA
Total Car‐Jeep‐
Code Motorcycle Tractor Truck‐Bus PCU VPD
Length (km) Minibus
67DR001 4.00 ‐ ‐
67DR002 7.35 4 2 4 12 6
67DR003 8.22 ‐ ‐
67DR004 11.70 5 2 6 17 8
23
ANNEX 2 POPULATION SERVED
Road
67DR001
67DR002
67DR003
67DR004
67DR005
67DR006
67DR007
67DR008
67DR009
67DR010
67DR011
67DR012
67DR013
67DR014
67DR015
SN VDC/municipality Population
SRN
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 Atichaur 4,277 X
2 Baddhu 5,059 X
3 Wai 3,383 X
4 Barhabis 8,374 X X X
5 Bichhaiya 2,723
6 Bramhatola 6,431 X X
7 Budhiganga 4,042 X
8 Chhatara 3,712 X
9 Dahakot 4,438 X
10 Dogadi 3,456 X
11 Gotree 6,030 X
12 Gudukhati 5,130 X X
13 Jagannath 3,587 X
14 Jayabageswori 2,512 X
15 Jugada 5,358 X X
16 Jukot 3,230 X X
17 Kailasjmandau 9,586 X X
18 Kanda 3,200 X
19 Kolti 7,134 X X X
20 Kotila 3,224 X X
21 Kuldeumandau 6,872 X X X
22 Manakot 2,688 X
23 Martadi 8,807 X X
24 Pandusain 6,751 X
25 Rugin 2,914 X
24
SN
26 Sappata
27 Tolidewal
Total
Total population
VDC/municipality
134,154
Population
3
14,086 67DR001
3
20,376 67DR002
2
16,458 67DR003
2
10,708 67DR004
2
14,165 67DR005
1
6,751 67DR006
1
7,134 67DR007
3
15,107 67DR008
25
2
X
9,401 67DR009
2
8,586 67DR010
3
X
18,363 67DR011
3
12,484 67DR012
Road
2
10,358 67DR013
2
6,613 67DR014
3
12,841 67DR015
0
‐ 0
0
‐ 0
0
‐ 0
0
‐ 0
0
‐ 0
0
‐ 0
0
‐ 0
0
‐ 0
5
34,526 SRN
ANNEX 3 LOCATION OF PROPOSED INTERVENTIONS
End chainage (km) or
Stone Causeway (m)
Masonry walls (m3)
Start chainage (km)
Rehabilitation (km)
Pipe culvert (units)
Blacktopping (km)
Gabion walls (m3)
CC Causeway (m)
Slab culvert (m)
or X‐coordinate
Gravelling (km)
Lined drain (m)
Widening (m)
Y‐coordinate
Length (km)
Bridge (m)
Road code Road Name
26
Photo 01: Participants in the Orientation workshop in Bajura District