This article was downloaded by: [Dalhousie University]

On: 11 July 2014, At: 09:04

Publisher: Routledge
Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered
office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK

Sport in Society: Cultures, Commerce,

Media, Politics
Publication details, including instructions for authors and
subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fcss20

1
Sport and diplomacy: an introduction
a b
Geoffrey Allen Pigman & J. Simon Rofe
a
Department of Political Sciences, University of Pretoria, South
Africa
b
SOAS, University of London, UK
Published online: 10 Dec 2013.

To cite this article: Geoffrey Allen Pigman & J. Simon Rofe (2014) Sport and diplomacy: an
1
introduction , Sport in Society: Cultures, Commerce, Media, Politics, 17:9, 1095-1097, DOI:
10.1080/17430437.2013.856612

To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2013.856612

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the
“Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis,
our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to
the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions
and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors,
and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content
should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources
of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims,
proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever
or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or
arising out of the use of the Content.

This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any
substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing,
systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms &
Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-
and-conditions
 Sport in Society, 2014
Vol. 17, No. 9, 1095–1097, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2013.856612

Sport and diplomacy: an introduction1

Geoffrey Allen Pigmana* and J. Simon Rofeb
a
Department of Political Sciences, University of Pretoria, South Africa; bSOAS, University of
London, UK

This volume of Sport in Society focuses on the interrelationships between international

sport and diplomacy. Its genesis came from the establishment in 2011 of the Diplomacy
and International Sport research group by directors Stuart Murray (Bond University),
Geoffrey Allen Pigman (University of Pretoria) and J. Simon Rofe (SOAS, University
Downloaded by [Dalhousie University] at 09:04 11 July 2014

of London). Already scholars of diplomacy and interested in the phenomenon of

international sport, we each discovered independently that there was a significant lacuna
in the literature linking diplomatic studies to international sport. Our endeavours aim to
craft a greater understanding of how the two subjects are interrelated, in the first instance
to contribute to scholarship in the two fields, but not least in the second because both sport
and diplomacy have the capacity to influence the lives of millions of people across the
planet.
The international dimension of sporting competition has been considered extensively
in sociological literature by scholars like David Black and Robert Redeker. A few seminal
case studies highlighting the part played by international sport in international relations
and diplomacy have also recently been published, including articles by Manzenreiter
(2008) and Chehabi (2001). However, the publication of these works highlighted the
fact that no systematic attempt to understand international sport and its rôle in diplomacy
had yet been undertaken. We decided to establish the research group in an attempt to fill
that void.
The time for a systematic investigation of sports-diplomacy is ripe for two primary
reasons. First, nowhere has the diffusion and redistribution of political and economic
power in our globalizing world been more visible to the general public and scholars alike
than in international sport. Around the world on any given day, at almost any hour,
sporting experiences that once were limited to thousands are now shared by millions. Now,
the UEFA Champions League, the National Basketball Association, Formula One
motorsports or Master’s Series tennis matches are experiences shared even by people with
access to the most rudimentary technologies, particularly across the Global South. Kicked
off by the Beijing Summer Olympics, the period since 2008 has witnessed the spread of
the world’s largest sporting mega-events, the Olympic Games and the FIFA football
(soccer) World Cup, to the BRICS nations, with the 2010 FIFA World Cup in South
Africa, upcoming Olympiads in Sochi, Russia (2014), and Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2016),
and the 2014 FIFA World Cup in Brazil.

1
The guest editors, Geoffrey Allen Pigman and J. Simon Rofe, would like to extend their thanks in
this endeavour to Boria Majumdar, editor-in-chief of Sport in Society: Cultures, Commerce, Media
and Politics.

*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

q 2013 Taylor & Francis

 1096 G. A. Pigman and J. S. Rofe

The second rationale for investigating sports-diplomacy at this juncture is the relative
rise in the importance of soft power, the power to persuade and attract, as a major
development in international relations since the end of the Cold War. As diplomacy is one
of the primary and perhaps most important tools of soft power, there has been a heightened
interest in diplomacy, and in particular the techniques of public diplomacy and place
branding, amongst scholars and the general public alike. International sporting
competition is perceived increasingly as an ideal channel for nations, regions and cities
to share their identities, their merits and ‘brands’ with the rest of the world.
The papers in this volume are intentionally both methodologically heterodox and
theoretically diverse, reflecting the burgeoning field of enquiry bringing together sport and
diplomacy. To embark upon this endeavour, Stuart Murray and Geoffrey Allen Pigman
propose a broad theoretical taxonomy of the sport diplomacy relationship. The papers that
follow paint a richer picture of these relationships by considering a range of sports
(football, rugby, tennis, speed skating), international sporting institutions (IOC, FIFA,
Downloaded by [Dalhousie University] at 09:04 11 July 2014

RFU), events (Olympics, Rugby World Cup, Football World Cup, UEFA Champions
League, Commonwealth Games, Grand Slam tennis tournaments) and nations (UK,
Romania, New Zealand, Australia). At the same time, the papers address an equally wide
range of contemporary diplomatic actors (national governments, cities, international
sporting federations, transnational firms, transnational social groups) and functions or
processes (representation, communication, multi-level diplomacy, public diplomacy,
celebrity diplomacy). Mark Pope explores the public diplomacy surrounding the London
2012 Olympiad in the light of a cosmopolitan discourse that questions openness and levels
of inclusiveness in the London Games. J. Simon Rofe probes the role played by an iconic
sporting institution – English football club Manchester United – as a non-state actor in
traditional and new understandings of diplomacy. Alan Tomlinson, focusing on FIFA,
addresses the challenges faced by international sporting bodies in attracting and
maintaining public confidence in them as facilitators for international sporting
competition. Anthony Deos evaluates New Zealand’s use of relational public diplomacy
as a means of attracting tourism and investment on the occasion of their hosting the 2011
Rugby World Cup. Antoaneta Vanc investigates Ilie Nastase’s role as a celebrity ‘anti-
diplomat’ in representing a Romanian government seeking to project an international
image distinct from the Soviet bloc during the cold war. Caitlin Byrne analyses the
diplomatic relationship between international sporting federations and host cities, using
the case study of negotiations between the Commonwealth Games Federation and Gold
Coast, as Gold Coast prepares to host the 2018 Commonwealth Games. In addition to the
scholarly papers, a shorter paper by a sporting practitioner, Olympic speed skater Blake
Skjellerup, offers a highly personal and insightful reflection on how competitors engage in
multiple diplomatic representations through their practice in international sport. The
scholarly papers not only draw deeply upon the literatures of international relations and
diplomatic studies, but they also draw broadly from other literatures: history, sociology,
political theory and philosophy, urban studies, political science and political economy,
amongst others. Research methods range from historical and contemporary documentary
research to first-person interviews, investigative journalism, quantitative analysis and
participant – observer research.
The divergence across so many metrics that we were able to include in this volume
highlights the value of, and the need for, methodological and disciplinary pluralism as
this research area emerges. In addition to providing an ideal vehicle for drawing linkages
between existing literatures, sports-diplomacy research makes an important contribution
to pushing out the already expanding and porous, and still contested, boundary of what
 Sport in Society 1097

constitutes contemporary diplomacy. The papers collectively also make the case for the
importance of developing theoretical frameworks for organizing the documentation of
sports-diplomacy to date and for generating new case study research. Between them,
these papers should offer future researchers an assemblage of tools for making
comparisons and recognizing patterns in the varied relationships between diplomacy and
international sport.
The research that has been undertaken for this volume has also identified a key issue
for scholars and practitioners of sports-diplomacy going forward. There is tremendous
variation in the standards of sports-diplomacy as it has been practised and an even wider
divergence in the extent to which it has been able to achieve stated objectives. Hence there
is a great need for benchmarking – identifying and disseminating standards of best
practice – both in the technical practice of sports-diplomacy and in the values, ethics and
objectives underlying it, and for capacity building. Governments, international sporting
federations, civil society organizations, global and regional firms that sponsor sporting
Downloaded by [Dalhousie University] at 09:04 11 July 2014

competition and international media firms that broadcast sport can all learn from one
another not only how to do what they do better but also how to think about what they do
from a more critical and well-informed perspective. At their worst, crises in international
sport can undermine dramatically a sport’s public credibility and thus its ability to bring
people together and mediate difference in a diplomatic sense, as the recent scandals
engulfing professional cycling have illustrated. It is our objective that the forthcoming
sports-diplomacy research, of which we hope that this volume is only the first major
product, will contribute significantly to that learning process.

References
Chehabi, H. E. 2001. “Sport Diplomacy Between the United States and Iran.” Diplomacy &
Statecraft 12 (1): 89 – 106.
Manzenreiter, Wolfram. 2008. “Football Diplomacy, Post-Colonialism and Japan’s Quest for
Normal State Status.” Sport in Society 11 (4): 414– 428.