AL Ghazali1

AL-GHAZALI
THE MYSTIC
A Study of the Life and Personality of
Abu Hamid Muhammad al-Tusi al-Ghazali, together
with an account of his Mystical Teaching and an
estimate of his place in the History of Islamic Mysticism
By
MARGARET SMITH, M.A., D.Lit.
Al-Hijra PUBLISHERS
CHAPTER I
CONTENTS
PART I. AL-GHAZALI'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY
Page
9
al-Ghazali's birth at Tus. His early years and education under a Sufi guardian and at Jurjan. His
college-life at Nishapur. His travels nd appointment to the Nizamiyya re College at Baghdad. His
interest in Sufism. His breakdown and signation.
1983
Hijra International Publishers Mian Chambers, 3-Temple Road, Lahore
CHAPTER II - - 23
The new Ghazali. His conversion and period of retirement. Life as a recluse at Damascus and
Jerusalem. His return to active life and teaching in Baghdad and NfshLpur. His final retirement
to Tus. His later years and death.
CHAPTER III 40
al-Ghazalfs character and personality. His sociability and love of travel. His tolerance and
charity to others. His love of animals and birds. His interest in gardens and plants.
CHAPTER IV -
al-Ghazali's family relationships. His brother Ahmad. His mother and sisters. His home-life. His
friends and students and disciples.
CHAPTER V
al-Ghazall's literary style. His wide resources. His power of illustration and extensive use of
imagery.
CHAPTER VI 82
al-Ghazall as poet and his views on poetry. His interest in music and its effects. His love of
Beauty.
PART II. AL-GHAZAL I'S MYSTICAL TEACHING
CHAPTER VIII - - - `
105
al-Ghazall's Sources. Neo-Platonism. Arab Philosophy. Jud;r The New Testament. Christian
Mysticism. Islamic ands I5ufj Sources.
55 67
Accurate Printers Paisa Akhbar, Lahore

CHAPTER VII - - -
al-Ghazali as Mystic. His otherworldliness and recourse to solitude. The life of Prayer and
Praise.
9r
FL 480
8 CONTENTS-continued
CHAPTER IX
al-Ghazall's Teaching on the Nature of of Being. . God as Beauty and Light. The human soul, its
nature and origin.
CHAPTER X
The beginning of the soul's ascent to relation to the Creator. The Veils of pentance and
Conversion. Asceticism.
Page 133
the Godhead. The Unity The wonders of Creation. God and the soul of Man.
God. The creature in its Darkness and, Light. ReThe Purgative Life.
147
CHAPTER XI
The Mystic Path. The servant in relation to his Lord. The active life of virtue. The solitary life of
Meditation and Recollection. T he llluminative Life.
CHAPTER XII
The end of the Path. Love and its fruits. Fellowship, Gnosis, the Beatific Vision and Union. The
lover and the Beloved. The life of the Saints in God.
CHAPTER XIII
al-Ghazall's influence. Upon Islam and Sufism. Upon the Religious Orders. Upon Suhrawardf:
Ibn al-Arahl: al-Sha'ranl. Upon Jewish Thought. Upon MMediaaval Christian Mysticism : St.
Thomas Aquinas: Dante Alighieri. Blaise Pascal.
CHAPTER XIV
- 227
Summary of al-Ghazall's Mystical teaching. His original contribution to the Sufi doctrine. His
place in the history of Islamic Mvsticism.
PREFACE
THIS book owes its origin to the honour done me by the Committee of Manchester College,
Oxford, in electing me to a Senior Research Studentship, which I held from 1936 to 1938.
During this period I was able to investigate the material which was afterwards used for this book,
the publication of which has been delayed by circumstances beyond my control. I owe a debt of
deep gratitude to Manchester College for the opportunity thus given of undertaking this study,
and also for the opportunity of working in Oxford, where I found much help for my work.
In times like these it is well to turn our thoughts from the things which are temporal to the things
which are abiding and eternal. When we study the life and work of the mystics, we see that their
inward vision did not make them less capable of serving other men, but rather of living a fuller
life for others in the world, while at the same time they sought always to live a life of the closest
fellowship with God.
159
198
MARGARET SMITH.
LONDON,
Alai-, 1944.
CHAPTER I
al-Ghazdlis birth at Tits. His Early Years and
Education. His Travels and Professional Work. His
interest in Sufism.
Abu Ilamid Muhammad b. Muhammad b. Muhammad b. Ta'us Ahmad al-Tusi al-Shafi'i, known
as al-N_ishapuri, the Proof of Islam, the Ornament of Religion, the Guide to the True Faith, was
born in 450 /1058 at Tifs, near the modern Meshhed, in Khurasan. This district, in the North East
of the old Persian Empire, had been chosen by the 'Abbasids as the centre for the propaganda
which preceded the establishment of their empire in the eight century A.D., and from that time
onwards it was conspicuous for the number of religious teachers, writers, and especially poets,
whom it produced.'
Tus itself, comprising the two townships of Tabaran and Nawgan, was a town of considerable
size, well-built and thickly populated, famous for its waters and its trees and the mineral deposits
in the neighbouring mountains, and still more famous as the birthplace of some of the most
outstanding personalities in the history of Islam. Among these was Abu Àll al-Hasan b. Ishaq,
known as Ni?am al-hulks, who held this district as a fief, conferred on him by the Caliph Malik
Shah, and built there
l two cathedral mosques. The Nipam al-hulk was destined to play a great part in the life of al-
Ghazali himself. Two famous poets were also natives of Tus, Firdawsi (ob. 416/1025), author of
the Shdhndma, the greatest of Persian epic poems, and the celebrated 'Umar Khayyam,3 who
was contemporary with al-Ghazali.
M 1 These included the two great mystics, Abu Yazld al-Bistaml and Husayn b. Alansiir al-
Hallaj (cf. Pp. 125 ff z1G below) and the Sufi poet Abu Sa'ld b. Abi'l-Khayr. (cf. R. A.
Nicholson, Studies in Islamic Mvsncism, pp. 1-76).
• Ob. 485 X1092. Cf. E. G. Browne, Literary Hislorv of Persia, II. Pp. 175 t}.
• Ob. c. 517,11125. Cf. ibid., pp. 252 ff.
PART I.
AL-GHAZALI'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY
9
ro -: ' AL-GHAZALI'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY
al-Ghazali's nisba, according to the most reliable authorities,
was derived from the village of Ghazala, near hus. He was, therefore, a Persian, though most of
his books were written in Arabic. Some thirty years before al-Ghazali's birth, the Seljuq Turks
had begun';to overrun the North and East of Persia ; in 429 A.A. Tughtil Bey had taken Nishilpilr
and in he had established himself in Baghdad. He was ruling A as " King of the East and of the
West " at the time of al-Ghazali's birth, and five years later was succeeded by his nephew Alp
Arslan.
al-Ghazali was not the first scholar of distinction in his family: there had been another Abu
Hamid al-Ghazali, his uncle, a teacher
whose authority was recognised by jurisconsults and savants
from far and wide, who was also a writer. He was buried at
Tus. I al-Ghazali's father, however, like his grandfather, was a
spinner and seller of wool, a poor man but devout. It is related
that when his day's spinning was finished, he used to frequent
the company of the divines, and spent what he could in their
service. After listening to their sermons, he used to beseech
God, with all humility, to grant him a son who should be a preacher
and a divine. His prayer was answered, for he had two sons,
Abu Hamid Muhammad, who became the greatest religious
teacher of Islam, and Abu'1-Futiih Ahmad, surnamed Maid
al-Din (the Glory of Religion), who had such power in preaching
that his congregations were said to tremble with fear at his words,
and he also, like his brother, was a mystic.= Besides this one
brother, al-Ghazali had several sisters.
Their father died when his sons were still young and before
his death he committed them to the care of a Sufi friend, to whom
he stated that he had greatly regretted his own lack of education,
and he wished that his sons should have what he had lacked
therefore, such money as he was able to leave them was to be
spent entirely on their education. al-Ghazali's education at
this stage would probably consist of what he describes later as
the right school course for a boy, i.e., the study of the Qur'an
and Traditions, to which he adds what, in his own case, probably
' Cf. Subkf, Tabagat, III, p. 36. Ibid., Ill, pp, 102 ff Cf. also p, 54,
AL-GHAZALI'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY rr
came from his Sufi guardian-stories of the saints and their spiritual states, " in order that the love
of the godly may be implanted within him," He includes also the committal to memory of poems
"which contain the mention of passionate
love and lovers." I
This Sufi friend undertook the education of the two boys until the small legacy was exhausted,
and then, since he was himself a poor man, he advised them to betake themselves to a madrassa
(college or academy), where, as students, they would have rations assigned to them, and this they
did. al-Ghazali afterwards said of this period in his life, " We sought learning for the sake of
something other than God, but He would not allow it to be for anything but Himself." 2 It was
perhaps with the thought of what he owed to this Sufi friend in his mind that al-Ghazali wrote
later on : " Let the student be assured that more is due to the teacher than the father, for the
teacher is the cause to him of eternal life and the father the cause only of his temporal life. It was
for that reason that Alexander, when asked whether he honoured his teacher or his father the
more, replied, ' My teacher, most certainly.' " s
al-Ghazali writes also of the right conduct- of the pupil towards the teacher, which may well
have been impressed upon him at this age, that the pupil ought to listen attentively to the teacher
and not speak except when asked questions, nor should he contradict his master, saying : " So
and so said the opposite of what you say." Nor should the pupil give advice to his teacher, in
opposition to his expressed opinion, in order to appear more learned than he is. It may well be
that in his later years, al-Gliazali's conscience reproached him in this respect, for he was
undoubtedly an ambitious, and probably a conceited boy, at any rate fully aware of his own
exceptional ability. He adds that the pupil should not discuss matters in class with his fellow-
pupils, nor be restless, but should sit silent, with eyes cast down, as quiet and well-behaved as if
he were at prayer. A scholar should not pester the teacher when he is tired, nor, when he leaves
should the pupil follow him, asking questions along the road, which
' MI. Rida, .4ba Hdmid, p. 32. 2 al-Subki, Tab, IV, p. 102, rblrzini al-':lvual, p. 130.
12 AL-GHAZALI'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY
suggests a personal recollection of his own eager desire for know
ledge. Nor should the pupil criticise his teacher for outward
conduct which he thinks unlawful, since the teacher is aware,
as the boy is not, of the inner motives for it. I
It is possible, too, that there is a reference to his own boyhood
in his father's house and that of his guardian, in the recommend
ations which al-Ghazali makes later on for the upbringing of boys.
A boy, he considers, should be brought up austerely and trained
to be hardy, and the mother is responsible as much as the father
for his training in good conduct. His bed should be hard, so
that his limbs may be sturdy and he will not put on superfluous
flesh. His food and clothing should be simple, and he should
take plenty of active exercise, and not be allowed to grow lazy.
He ought not to be boastful in regard to what his father may
possess, but modest and courteous in his dealings with others,
realising that dignity consists in giving, not in taking. Greed is to be regarded as contemptible,
and the love of money as a vile
and poisonous thing. A boy should not speak except when spoken to, and should listen to those
older than himself and stand in their presence. If beaten by his teacher, he should not cry out or
make a fuss, but behave courageously. After schoolhours a boy should be allowed to play and
enjoy himself, for all work and no play " will deaden a boy's heart and spoil his intelligence and
make life grievous unto him."
An illustration which al-Ghazali uses later suggests that one of the amusements which he
enjoyed as a boy was a marionette show, for he says that the one who relates his actions to
himself, because he supposes that what is seen in the visible world has no cause in the invisible
world, is like the boy who is looking at the showman's play. From behind a curtain the showman
produces puppets, which appear to dance and stand and sit yet they do not move of themselves,
but are moved by wires, invisible in the darkness, which are in the hands of the showman. He is
hidden from the sight of the boys who watch, and they enjoy the performance and wonder at
these bundles of rags which are dancing and playing and standing and sitting. Those who are
wiser than the boys know that something causes the
I Bidayat al-Hidaya, p. 40.
AL-GHAZALI'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY 13
movement, the puppets do not move of themselves, but even they perhaps do not know how it is
managed, nor understand the matter as the showman understands it. So it is, too, al-Ghazali adds,
with the people of this world, who fail to realise that all things and all events are the outcome of
the Divine Will. The boy, he holds, must obey both his parents and his teacher and all who are
set in authority over him. As soon as he reaches years of discretion, he must learn to fulfil his
religious duties and to realise that this world is only a place of preparation for the next. al-
Ghazali concludes with the statement that if the boy's upbringing is sound, he will find this rule
of life acceptable to him as an adult and it will be as deeply impressed on his heart as the
inscription is engraved upon the stone.
He adds a story, which he may have beard from his Sufi guardian, of the Sufi Sahl b. 'Abd Allah
al-Tustari (ob. 2831896), who, when he was but.three years old, used to get up at night to watch
his uncle M. b. Suwar at prayer. On one occasion his uncle asked the child if he would not also
give praise to his Creator. The boy asked how he should praise Him, and his uncle replied : "
When you put on your night-gown, say three times within your heart, without moving -your
tongue, " God is with me, God is watching me, God is looking upon me." The boy learnt to say it
and then his uncle told him to say it seven times each night, and the child did so. Then his uncle
said " Say it eleven times. The boy carried out his instructions and, speaking of it afterwards,
said that the sweetness of the words sank into his heart. At the end of a year his uncle said, "
Bear in mind what you have learnt and continue to do this for the rest of your life." I
While still a boy al-Ghazali began the study of jurisprudence in Tus"under Shaykh Ahmad b. M.
al-Radhkani al -Tusi, 3 and then travelled to Jurjan, in Mazardaran, to study under the Imam Abu
Nasr al-Isma'ill, 3 of whose lectures he made notes. Returning to Pis, he met with an adventure
which is recorded by most of his biographers, on the word of al-Ghazali himself.
i Ihya. III, pp. 63, 64. IV, P. 85

Sublet, Tab. III, p. 36.
$ Ibid., p. 37. The date here given for Abu Na.5r's-death appears to be
an error.
r
The party was attacked by highway robbers, who carried off all that the travellers had with them.
al-Ghazali went after them, though warned by the chief of the brigands that he imperilled his life
by so doing. He persisted, however, and begged only for the return of his precious note-books,
which could be of no value to them. " What are your note-books ? " asked the robber-chief, and
al-Ghazali explained that they contained notes of the lectures he had recently heard and
represented his knowledge of them. The 'robber laughed and said, " How can you lay claim to
this knowledge when we have taken it from you ? Beipg separated from your knowledge, you
remain without it." Then he ordered one of his men to restore the note-books to their owner. al-
Ghazali felt that the words of the robber were to be taken as Divine guidance to him, and when
he had reached Tus, he betook himself to study for three years, during which time he committed
to memory all the contents of his note-books, so that if he were robbed again, he could not be de-
prived of his learning.
It seems probable that it was during these three years that al-Ghazali was studying Sufism under
the guidance of Yusuf al-Nassaj. al-Ghazali said later of himself : " At the beginning of my
career, I knew nothing of the spiritual 'states' of the righteous and the 'stations' of the gnostics
until I associated / with my Shaykh Yusuf al-Nassaj in Tus, but he did not cease to ' polish' me
by means of self-discipline until I was favoured with revelations and I heard the voice of God in
a dream saying to me, ' Abd Hamid.' My first thought was that perhaps Satan was addressing me,
but He said : 'Not so, it is your Lord Who is everywhere present with you. 0 Abu Hamid,
abandon your formal rules, and seek the company of those whom I have appointed to be My
friends in the earth, who have renounced both heaven and earth, for love of Me.' Then I said : '
By Thy Glory, hast Thou not made me to think rightly of Thee (i.e., as they do) ? ' • He answered
: ' I have done so, and that which separates you from them is your pre-occupation with the love
of this world : therefore depart from it of your own choice, before you are cast out of it with
ignominy. For I have
' Subkf, Tab., IV, p. 103.
shed upon you the radiance of My glorious Presence, therefore, stretch forth your hand and
obtain.' Then I woke up, happy and rejoicing, and came to my Shaykh' YCisuf al-Nassaj and told
him of my dream. He smiled, saying : ' 0 Abit Hamid, these are but the planks we use at the
beginning, which now we have kicked away, but if you continue in my company, your inward
vision shall be anointed with the antimony of the Divine assistance, until you behold the Throne
of God and those who are round about it. When you have reached that stage, you will not be
satisfied until you contemplate what the eye cannot see. So will you be purified from the
defilement of your human nature and rise above the limitations of your intellect and you will
hear the Voice of God Most High, saying unto you, as unto Moses, ' Verily I am God, the Lord
of all created things."' I
111 470/1077-8, al-Ghazali went to Nishapiir, and there, with other students from BS,' joined the
classes of Abu'l-Ma'ali al-Juwayni, known as the Imam al-Haramayn, a under whom he studied
theology, philosophy, logic, dialectic and natural science, and possibly also heard something
more of Sufism, for it is stated that the Imam had been a pupil of Abu Nu'aym al-Isfahani 4 and
when he himself was dealing with the doctrines of the Sufis and their mystic states (aAwdl)e he
used to draw tears from all present5
al-Ghazali early gave proof of great ability and also of a tendency to scepticism. He engaged in
debates with other students and seems to have been successful in refuting their arguments. The
Imam al-Haramyn allowed much freedom to his students, and this freedom acted as a stimulus to
the genius of his brilliant .pupil. Even at this early age al-Ghazali was lecturing to his fellow-
students and beginning to write,-and at this time his health suffered from his over-application to
work. Describing al-Ghazali, with two other pupils of his, the Imam al-Haramayn said
M. al-Murtadk, lthdf, p. 9. Al. Ride, Abu Maslid, pp. 22, 23,

• Cf. Ibn ' Asakir, Kitdb Tabyin, fol. 87.
• "Imam of the Two Sanctuaries," so-called because he taught at both
Mecca and Medina. Ob. 478 11085, For a full account of his career cf. Subki
Tab. III. pp. 249 ff.
4 Ob. 430/1038, the author of the great biography of the saints known as
the Hllyal al-Awdhyd.
5 Ibn Khallikan, Biog. Dirt., I. p. 413.
i
x6 AL-GHAZALI'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY
" al-Ghazali is a sea to drown in, al-Kiya is a raging lion and al-Khawafi is a burning fire," He is
reported to have said also: "al-Khawafi's strong point is verification, al-Ghazali's is speculation,
and al-Kiya's is explanation." 1 While the Imam appeared to be proud of his distinguished pupil,
it is said that he was really jealous of him, because al-Ghazali excelled his master in the
quickness of his explanations and in his natural capacity, and it was not acceptable to the older
man that al-Ghazali, still in his early twenties, should already have won a reputation for writings
which showed that he had made himself the master of every subject to which he had applied
himself. It is related that when al-Ghazali had written his Kitdb al-Mankhiil, he showed it to the
Imam al-Haramayn, who observed : " You have buried me while I am still alive. Why did you
not have patience to wait until I was dead ? For your book has thrust my writings out of sight." s
It was during th s, period that al-Ghazali became impatient of dogmatic teaching and abandoned
the policy of dependence upon authority (taglad) : "he rose up to free, his mind from that
irksome captivity, in order to seek for that which aroused the attention of the rational soul of
itself, and thereby to facilitate for the soul the attainment of its happiness and joy." 8 From his
boyhood, al-Ghazali tells us, he had been possessed by the
desire to comprehend the real meaning of things for himself
and he had come to'the conclusion that the greatest hindrance
in the search for truth was the acceptance of beliefs on the
authority of parents and teachers, and a rigid adherence to the
heritage of the past. He remembered the traditional saying
ascribed to the Prophet that " Every child is born with a naturally
religious disposition ('ala'i fitra), then his parents make him into
a Jew or a Christian or a Magian," and he was anxious to know
what was that innate disposition before it was affected by un
reasoned.convictions imposed by others. So he set out to secure
a knowledge which left no room for doubt, and involved no
possibility of error or conjecture, and, finding that none of the
knowledge which he had acquired, except that which was based
s Subkr, T'ab., IV, pp. 103, 1o6. For an account of the subsequent careers of these two fellow-
students cf. pp. 6o ff. below. r Yhfi'f, Mir'& al-Janaii, fol. x57 b.
3 Mi'yar al-'Ilm (Tarjamat al-Mu£annaf), p. 2.
AL-GHAZALI'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY . 17
on first-hand experience, satisfied these conditions, from this time onwards he became a seeker
after absolute truth and was content with no lower standard. He expressed this in a couplet which
became famous
" Take what you see and let hearsay alone,
When the sun has risen, what need have you of Saturn ? " He justified his scepticism by saying :
" He who does not doubt, does not investigate, and he who does not investigate does not
perceive, and he who does not perceive remains in blindness and error." All kinds of knowledge,
he felt, should be investigated by the scholar, for all might be a help to him and the true scholar
should be hostile to none, " For men are hostile to that of which they are ignorant." He says also
that it is the business of the true investigator to embark " on the deep waters of what is obscure
(al-ishkdl), from which the common folk should be ,kept away, just as boys are kept away from
the bank of the Tigris, lest they should be drowned. But those who are strong may embark upon
such studies just as the skilled swimmer is free to dive into deep waters.'
During this period al-Ghazali was also studying under the Sufi Abu 'Ali al-Fact b. M. b. 'Ali al-
Farmadhi al-Tiisi, 2 a pupil of al-Ghazali s uncle and of al-Qushayri, 3 who had established a
circle for instruction, held, we are told, in a garden full of flowers, at Nishapur, where he enjoyed
the patronage of Ni4am al-Mulk. His teaching attracted large numbers of Sufis and strangers
from other parts, since he was considered to be the greatest leader on the mystic Path. He died in
Tus in 477 /1084. From al-Farmadhi al-Ghazali learnt more of the Sufi " Way " and followed his
directions in regard to observing the daily duties of good works and works of supererogation,
while engaged in frequent devotions and earnestly striving the while to attain to salvation.
Passing beyond this stage, he took to asceticism and self-mortification, but did not find that these
brought him
r al-Muagidh pp. 3 ff. Miran al-'Aural, pp. 164, 165. 74. at-Risalat
al-Wa'izlyyat, p. iso.
a Cf. J3ml, Nafahft al-Uns, pp. 422, 419.
* Ob. 465 X1074. His Risdla is one of the earliest and most valuable treatises on Sufism, in
Arabic, and was later one of al-Ghazklf's chief sources for the
study of Sufism.
B
z8 AL GIIAZALI'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY
to his goal. I It was probably to this period that al-Ghazali was
referring .when he stated: "When I desired to set forth upon
the Sufi Path, and to drink of their wine, I considered my soul
and saw that it was encompassed by many veils. So I retired
into solitude and occupied myself with self-discipline and self
mortification for forty days, and I was given knowledge which
I had not possessed before, purer and finer than. I had yet known,
and I considered it, and lo, it contained a legalistic element.
Then I betook myself again to solitude and occupied myself
with discipline and self-mortification for forty days, and then

I was given other knowledge, still finer and purer than that I
possessed at first, and I rejoiced in it : then I e,Lamined it and
behold, it contained a speculative element. So I returned
to solitude a third time, for forty days again, and I received other
knowledge, still finer and purer, but when I examined it, behold
it contained an admixture of knowledge acquired by human
means ('ilm) and so I had not yet overtaken those possessed of
knowledge from on high (al-'alum ai-Laduniyya).' So I realised
that writing over what, has been erased is not like writing on what was originally pure and clean,
and I had not really separated myself from speculation except in a few matters." .3 No doubt the
increasing attraction of the Sufi teaching, with its insistence upon a direct personal experience of
God added to Ghazali s critical dissatisfaction with dogmatism: „.
The Imam al-Haramyn died in 478 /io85', after teaching in Nishapur for nearly thirty years, and
his biographer records that at the moment of his death, his .students, who numbered four hundred
and one, broke their pens and ink-horns and allowed a full year to elapse before they resumed
their studies.' Alp Arslan. had been succeeded by Malik Shah in 467/1072, and al-Ghazali now
betook himself to the-.royal camp, where Malik Shah's great Vizier Nizant al-Mulk had gathered
around him a circle of the most distinguished scholars of the time, who frequented his levees and
dedicated their books to him. The Vizier had a great regard for the $fifis, and had received visits
' Subkr, Tab.. IY, p. log,
' Cf. at-Rujjrr a -Ladunivya, pp. 22 ff.
' Subkr,' Tab., IV. pp. 9, so. At. Rica, op. Cit., p. 23. Mi.rfatis, rtlrdf, p. 9.
' Iba KhalikLn, op. cit,, II. n. 122.
AL-GHAZALI'S LIFE AND, PERSONALITY 19
from both the Imam al-Haramayn and al-Qushayri. to whom he showed great honour. Of him,
after his death, his son-in-law wrote
'" Niram al-Mulk was a precious pearl, formed of pure nobility by
God the All-Merciful,
So fine was it that the age did not realise its worth, and its' Maker,
jealous for its honour, restored it to its shell."'
Nizam al-Mulk not only encouraged the scholars of the age to come to his court, but he also
founded a number of colleges, Sfifi monasteries, and mosques, in different provinces, building
colleges in Baghdad, Balkh, Nishapur, Herat, Isfahan, Basra, Merv, Amul (in Tabaristan) and
Mosul, so that it was said of him that there was a college founded by him in every city of 'Iraq
and Khurasan.2
al-Ghazali, whose fame as a scholar had preceded him, was received with much favour by the
Vizier, who honoured him and made rnuch of him. NiZAm al-Mulk held frequent assemblies for
debate and discussion and al-Ghazitli soon made his mark at these and was conspicuous for his
skill in debate. He assumed the leadership among his fellow-scholars, as he had done in
Khurasan, and his fame became widespread. Travellers came from afar to hear him and, as his
biographer says, "he was one of those whom men pointed out."
al-Ghazali's reputation as a scholar and especially his profound knowledge of Muslim theology
and philosophy led Niz, am al-Mulk to appoint him to the Chair of Theology at the Nizamiyya
College at Baghdad,- in 484 lrogr, when al-Ghazali was only thirty-four. These Colleges or
Academies had taken the place of the mosques, as centres of instruction, because of the
increasing numbers of students devoted to learning, who needed some means of maintaining
themselves. A madrassa had been founded in Baghdad as early as 383/993 and before long most
of the larger cities possessed such schools of learning. To found such a centre of knowledge was
reckoned a pious deed and the endowments were made sufficient to cover the general costs of
maintenance, the stipends of professors and lecturers,
I Cf. Ibn Khallikan, I. p. 413. Similar verses were also inscribed over the tomb of Suhrawardi
alJlagtul (ob. 58711rg11. 2 M. Rid.. op, cit., p. io.
M
zn AL-GHAZALT'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY
and to provide scholarships for students. The buildings were
made of stone and over the door was carved a dedicatory in
scription, while the interior included an open courtyard, contain
ing a large tank, and behind was the oratory. Round this court
yard were arcades and small rooms opening into the court, ,together with lecture-rooms and
libraries. The upper storey of.the building consisted of an open hall, furnished with circular,
arched windows, with a pillar in the centre. Every encouragement was given to 'scholarship and
learning by the authorities, and the poor scholar, travelling in pursuit of learning, could find free
board and 'lodging at these colleges. There were libraries, both public and private, available for
the use of students, the first to be established in Baghdad being Ma'mnn's " House of Wisdom"
(Bayt al-Hikma), founded in 2x5/830. In the thirteenth century Baghdad possessed no fewer.
than thirty-six libraries.
At Baghdad, not only theology, but medicine and.philosophy were taught, and the School of
Baghdad was characterised from the first by its scientific spirit, accepting as valid only what was
confirmed by experiment. There was complete freedom to peach for any teacher who was
competent and knew his subject, and the lectures at Baghdad were attended by Muslim scholars
from all parts of the Empire. While there were fixed days and hours for individual lecturers, there
was no time-limit
to lectures, nor any limit to the number of lectures that might
be delivered on a given subject. The lecture usually took the

form of a prepared treatise and was taken down verbatim by
the class. The lecturer could not use the work of other scholars
except by written permission, nor could members of the class
make use of the substance of the lecture without the lecturer's

leave. F I
The Nizamiyya College, to which al-Ghazali was appointed, had been built by Nizam al-Mulk in
457 /ro65, the first Director being Abu Ishaq al-Shirazi, who died in 476 /io83. 2 His biographer
states that when al-Ghazali arrived to take up his
' Cf. Ku. Bukhsh, Islamic Civilisation, 11, pp. 51 ff. J. Hell, The Arab
Civilisation, PP. 79, 8o. F. Wastenfeld, Die Academien der Araber & ihre Lehrer, pp. 8 if.
' Cf. Subkl, jab., 111, pp. 88 ff. for a detailed account of Abu Ishaq's career.
appointment at the Nizamiyya, the jurists came to him and said " We have been told that it has
been the custom for everyone who teaches in this building to invite the jurists to be present and
listen, and we wish you to invite us to your lectures on theolo' ('ilm)" al-Ghazali replied : "Most
willingly, but on one of -tVo conditions, either you shall provide refreshments for the day, and I
shall fix the date, or the other way round." They said " No, you shall provide refreshments, and
we wish to be invited for to-day." He rejoined : " Then the food provided must be what I can
manage, and it will be bread and vinegar and herbs." Then thdy exclaimed : " No, by God, but
you shall fix the day, and we will supply provisions : we intend to have a supply of chicken and
of sweetmeats." Then al-Ghazali said, " Very well, then, the day shall be two years hence." So
they admitted that they were baffled and left it all to him.'
But, none the less, al-Ghazali received a warm welcome in Baghdad. We are told that he
astonished the Baghdadis by the excellence of his lectures, his fluent delivery, the extent of his
learning, the subtlety of his allusions, and the lucidity of his explanations, and they conceived a
great regard for him and treated him " as the apple of their eye. His lectures attracted large
classes, which included the chief savants of the time. His wealth and position became such that
his household and the number of his followers were said to exceed those. of the great nobles and
Amirs and even the court of the Caliph himself. He became the Imam of 'Iraq, as he had been
Imam of Khurasan.2 In addition to lecturing, al-Ghazali was called upon to give legal decisions,
based on the Canon. Law (falawa), e.g., Yusuf b. Tashfin, chief of the Almoravides, who had
conquered Spain in A.D. io88, formed an unfavourable opinion of the independent Muslim
chiefs who exercised authority there, and referred the matter to al-Ghazali, among others, for his
opinion and al-Ghazali, in consultation with Abu Bakr Turtishi, a wellknown authority on law
and tradition (ob. 520 /1126), addressed letters of advice to Yusuf, urging him to govern with
justice, and at the same time sent decisions with regard to these Muslim
1 Subkt, Tab., IV, p. 113.
+ Subkt, op. cit., IV. p. 1o7. Jam!, Nafahdt al-Uns, p. 327. Ibn 'Asakir,
op, cit., fol. 88a.
chieftains, authorising him to execute upon them the Divine sentence, and- this YUsuf did,
depriving them of their dignities and replacing them by his own relatives' al-Ghazali was also
engaged in writing throughout this period, to which his earlier works belong.
But in spite of the exacting nature of his work " the fire of his burning intellect was not
quenched," says one of his biographers, " nor his eagerness to unveil the truth in its-entirety." He
began to doubt even the evidence of his senses and for two months was a complete sceptic, but
gradually, by the help of God, as he believed, his mind recovered its equilibrium and his power
of reasoning returned, and he then applied himself resolutely to the search for truth, by an
exhaustive study of the writings of the scholastic theologians, the philosophers, and finally, of
the Sufis, believing that the truth must have been attained by one of these groups of thinkers.
His_ investigations led him to reject the first two, though he did not fail to make use of their met
o s and, to some_ ex eat, of_ffieit co: ncTus , nn Tis racer wnFrigs, 2 but he was Ted to
concentrate his attention on Sufism, eing convinced that the mystics, and they alone, among the
seekers for truth, had really attained their purpose.'
Meanwhile his classes continued to attract increasing numbers, and at this time included three
hundred of the most distinguished students of the time, and one hundred of the sons of the
princely families. At the height of his reputation, with a brilliant future' before him, and all that
the world could offer at his feet, the young professor suffered a complete physical breakdown,
and for a time was incapable of lecturing. When he recovered, he announced that he was going
on pilgrimage to Mecca, appointed
his brother Ahmad to take his place in the Nizamiyya College,
gave away all his wealth, except the small amount necessary
to maintain his family, and in 488 Jro96 he left Baghdad, with
the intention never to return thither.

Ihn Khalduu, Histoire des Berberes, pp. 79, 82.
' It was as a result of his pre-occupation with philosophy at this time that he wrote his Magasid
al-Falasifa (The Aims of the Philosophers) setting forth their position, without criticising it, and
this was followed by his Ta/afut al-Falasifa (The Destruction of the Philosophers), a refutation of
their teaching.
+ a1-Mungidh, PP. 4 ff.
CHAPTER II
The new Ghazali. His conversion and period of retirement. His return to active life. His later
years and his death.
The reasons for the abandonment of his career and for the rejection of all that the world had to
offer him-a decision which astonished and perplexed all who, heard of it-al-Ghazzll sets forth in
his apologia pro vita sua.1 In this he states that through his study of Sufism, he had come to
realise that knowledge of the way to God was not.the same as experience of that way that to
know the meaning of the renunciation of worldliness.was not the same thing as actually to
renounce this world and all its gifts. From his study of the writings of the $uf-is and their lives,
he saw that Si fism consisted not in words but-in actual experience. The attainment of the world
to come, for which he sought, depended upon his detachment from this present world' and the
directing of his whole concern towards God. This could only be accomplished by abandoning
reputation and wealth and fleeing from worldly pre-occupations and ties. As he reflected upon
his position in Baghdad, it seemed to al-Ghazali that he was fettered on every hand : his best
work consisted of his studies and his teaching and he felt that he was giving his time to what was
of no real importance or help in his purpose of drawing near to God, for the real motive of his
work was the desire for fame and self-glorification. It must have been of this time that he was
thinking, when he wrote later on : "The strongest ties which fetter the soul are those of the
creatures and the love of position, for the joy of exercising authority and control and of being
superior to others and of being their leader is the joy which in this world most prevails over the
souls of the intelligent. And how should it not be so, since its object is one of the attributes of
God Himself, namely, Lordship (rububiyya) ? For domination is naturally loved and desired by
the heart, because it is related to what is
r al.Mungidh min at•Dalal (The Deliverer from Error).
23
Divine-the search for power on the part of men is not blame
worthy, worthy, but power is of two kinds, the power which is alloyed
with all kinds of cares and quickly vanishes, for it is transitory
and belongs to this life, and the power which is eternal and
belongs to the next life. Man has been created subject to death
('ajul), desirous of what is transient, and so he is tempted by what
is only temporal."'
al-Ghazali felt at this time as if he were standing on the edge of
a precipice whence he would be hurled to destruction, unless he
drew-back in time. He reflected for some time on his position,
unable to make up his mind ; one day he resolved to leave
Baghdad and to cut loose from all these hindrances to spiritual
progress, and the next day the resolve weakened. " I put one
foot forward," he writes, "and withdrew the other." In the
morning he felt a sincere desire to seek the things pertaining to eternal life, in the evening
worldly and sensual desires got the better of him. The love of this world urged him to remain
where .he was, while at the same time the voice of conscience was calling insistently to him : "
Set out, set out, for but little of life remains and the journey before you is long. All your actions
and all your knowledge are nothing but hypocrisy and pretension. If you do not prepare now for
the life to come, when will you prepare ? If you do not detach yourself now, when will you do it
? " So al-Ghazali wrestled with the temptations of the world, the flesh and Satan for nearly six
months, and it was to this inward struggle that his breakdown was due. He was probably thinking
of this illness when he wrote : "We have sometimes seen a learned man fall sick with some
infirmity which affects the head and the breast, so that-his soul shuns all knowledge, and he
forgets what he has learnt and it becomes confused to him, and all that he has acquired in the past
remains hidden within his memory and his recollections." 3 The Caliph, hearing of the
Professor's illness, sent his own physician, among others, to treat him. When the doctors had
done their best for him and
t zhyA, IV, pp. 67, 68.
• Cf, St. Pau's description of a similar state of spiritual conflict Romans VII. 15-24, and St,
Augustine's Confessions, Bk. VIII. Chap. ii. Cf. H. Frick. Ghazdlis Selhstbiographie ; ein
Vergleich mil Auguslins Konfessionen.
• al-Risalal al-Laduniyya, p. 48..
were baffled, admitting that the cause was spiritual, not physical, al-Ghazali tells us that he
surrendered himself to the mercy of 'God, and in Him found the salvation' which he had sought
so long for himself.
He had asked a Sufi friend whether he should not devote himself to studying the Word of God
(the Qur'an), but the Sufi did not advise that, saying :»" The Way (to God) consists in
perseverance in cutting off all hindrances and healing the soul of the evil that afflicts it, and in
concerning yourself with that until it becomes habitual to you, The most effective means of
ensuring that is to leave your native land and your own country, to depart from 'Iraq, and betake
yourself to a life of seclusion and avoidance of sin. Then when that state is established in your
heart, you should give yourself continually to solitude, for the purpose of reflection and
meditation upon the kingdom of heaven and earth, until your attributes are made perfect, and you
are adorned with the virtues after being thus set free from the vices. When that has come to pass,
you will be fit to become an Imam and make it your sole concern to call men unto God."'
In this way, al-Ghazali says, God made it easy for him to abandon position and wealth and
family ties and friends. Fearing lest the Caliph and his personal friends should prevent him from
carrying out his real purpose of going to Syria in order to follow the Sufi Path and live a life of
devotion, he stated that he was going on pilgrimage and so departed. s
It was not the case that al-Ghazali now discovered that mysticism, that is, Sufism, was the way of
spiritual progress, he had been realising that fact over a period of years, by his theoretical study
of it, but now he consecrated himself to it, to make it part of his own personal experience. So he
left Baghdad and went to Syria, and remained there for nearly two years, occupying himself, as
lie tells us, " simply in retreat and solitude, self-discipline and self-mortification, being pre-
occupied with the cleansing of the soul, the amendment of character, and the purification of the
heart for the recollection of God Most High," in accordance with what he had learnt
.11i'pa, al-'11m (Tarjanm), pp. io, ii. a al-Mnngidh, pp. zo ff.
from his study of Sufism.' It was no doubt in reference to this period that he wrote afterwards in
his Rawdat al-Tilibiu (The Garden of the Seekers) : " True happiness and everything else that is
worth while, which remains with you when your ship is wrecked, consists in two things, one of
which is peace of mind, with the heart's freedom from all save God, and the other is the filling of
the heart thus freed, with the knowledge of Gnel Most Glorious, for it was to this end that all
things were created. The result of combining these two things is a fine personality." 2
al-Ghazali went to Damascus, where he arrived in 489/ro96. It is related that he entered the city
in the garb of a poor man and sat at the door of the Khangah al-Samisatiyya, a until an unknown
faqir gave him leave to enter and he then busied himself in sweeping the court for ablutions
attached to the monastery, and in doing the work of a servant there. Then, one day, when he was
sitting in the court of the 'Umayyad mosque, where a number of muftis were sitting talking
together, a villager, came to them, seeking a legal decision (fatwa), but they gave him no reply.
al-Ghazali, engaged in meditation, saw that no one gave the man any answer and that he was
troubled thereby, so he called the rustic to him and gave him a reply. The villager, however,
scoffed at him, saying : " The muftis gave me no decision and how can this ignorant fagir tell me
what I want to know." The muftis, meanwhile, were observing them and when
al-Ghazali had finished speaking, they called the villager and
asked him what that common fellow had said to him. When
the peasant explained the matter, they came to al-Ghazali and,
recognising him, surrounded him, requesting him to establish a
discussion circle for them. He held out the hope of meeting them
the next day, but instead he left the city that night.' Sdme of
his biographers says that after his stay there, he visited Jerusalem
and then returned to'Damascus, though al-Ghazali himself does
not mention such a visit to Jerusalem, but only the fact that he
settled down to a life of seclusion in Damascus, in the mosque
of the 'Umayyads, where he spent much time in prayer and

I al-Alungidl, p. 22.
1 Op. Cit., p. 234
3 The monastery belonging to the people of Samis3t, on the Euphrates. ' Subki, Tab., IV, p. 104.
meditation in the minaret of the mosque, which is now called the Minaret of al-Ghazali.' There
he shut himself in, so that he might be free from interruption. This place of retreat is said to have
been the cell of Shaykh Nasr al-Maqdisi, and it is related that al-Ghazali originally set out, with
the idea of joining Shaykh Nasr, and reached Damascus on the day of the Shaykh's death. It
happened that he went into the mosque, wearing the garb of a faqir, and came upon Shaykh
Nasr's seat in this place of retreat (zawiya). While he was there, a group of students arrived and
entered into conversation with him, after they had considered him and looked at him for a long
time, and as they talked with him, " they found him an ocean, inexhaustible." Then he asked
them what Shaykh Nasr was doing, and they replied : " He is dead and-we have just returned
from his funeral. When his end was approaching, we asked him who would be his successor and
teach his followers, and he said: ' When my funeral is over, return to my cell and you will find
someone there, a stranger,' and he described you to us. He told us to give that stranger his
greetings, for he would be his successor." al-Subki, who relates this story, is doubtful whether it
can be accepted as true. He points out that Shaykh Nasr died in 4904097 and 'that if this did
occur, it could not have been when al-Ghazali first arrived in Damascus, but after his return from
Jerusalem. He thinks, however, that al-Ghazali may have joined Shaykh Nasr when he first
reached Damascus in 489 /1096, and it would have been natural enough for him to return to his
former place
of retreat.'
1 Ibn Jubayr (ob. 1217 A.D), a traveller and writer belonging to Granada, who has left an
account of his travels between 1183 and 1135, says : The mosque has three monastic cells, one at
the Western side, which is like a high tower, comprising spacious dwellings and roomy cells, all
of them locked off and inhabited by pious Maghribins, and the highest of the chambers was the
retreat of Abu Hamid al-Ghaz3ll, may God have mercy on him, and to-day it is inhabited by the
jurist al-ZAhid Abii 'Abdallah b. Said." p. 266. Y 4ot also states : " Under the Dome of Nasr are
two black and white columns, which are said to have come from the throne of Baigls (the Queen
of Sheba), but God knows best. The Western minaret of the mosque is that in which al-GhazAll
used to worship, and Ibn Tumart (cf. pp. 63 . below). It is said
{fia~W-us;e-d-f be a fire-temple and that a flame of fire rose from it, which the
people of Harran used to worship." Geog. Worferbucb, II, p. 596.
1 Subkl, Tab., IV, p. 104.. al-Dhahabf stated that al-GhazAll joined h'agr, but that Na$r
appointed one of his own pupils, Na. r A112h a1-ilasltI, to succeed
him. Ibid.
1
28 AL-GHAZALr'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY
al-Ghazali now lived the life of an ascetic, wearing coarse clothing and practising the greatest
abstinence in the matter of food and drink, and giving most of his time to devotion. He found
leisure for writing, too, and while here he wrote the greatest of all his works, the Ihya 'Ulum al-
Din (The Revivification of Religion). His biographers relate that one day al-Ghazali happened to
enter one of the Damascus colleges' and found a lecturer there who was quoting his teaching, and
using the words - al-Ghazali said ... " and, fearing lest he should be overtaken
ity pride, he left Damascus and began to wander about the country. He himself states that. he
went to Jerusalem, where he gave himself up to the contemplative life, spending much of his
time in prayer in the great Mosque of 'Umar, where, as in Damascus, he secluded himself,
locking the door of his retreat behind him. As time went on, he seems to have gathered round
.him a circle of disciples. Abu'l-Futiih al-Maraghf stated at
a conference in Amul, in Tabaristan, that he had been present
at a gathering in Jerusalem, at the " Cradle of Jesus," a which
included al-Ghazali, Ismaìl al-Hakimi, Abu'l-Hasan al-Basri
and Ibrahim al-Shabbak al-Jurjani3 and a large number of pious
strangers, and these verses were improvised, one account says,

by al-Ghazali himself
" May I be your ransom, if it were not for love you would have
ransomed me,
But by the magic of two eye-pupils, you have made me captive. I came to you when my breast
was straitened by desire.
Had you known how great was my longing, you would have come to me,'
Abu'l-Hasan al-Basri was filled with ecstasy and his emotion so affected those present that one
of the company died on the spot, a
From Jerusalem, al-Ghazali went to Hebron and the Hijaz and thence to Egypt, visiting Cairo
and Alexandria, where he stayed for a time, and there he seems to have resumed his
1 It is said to have been the Amlniyya Mladrassa, but this was not founded
until A.H. 514, after al-Ghazali s death, Cf. l5'ustenfeld, op. cit., p. 43. Cf. Le Strange, Palestine
under the Moslems, p. r66. Cf. p. 63 below.
Subkl, Tab. IV, p. 205.
scholarly, activities, and taken up teaching again.' After. this he appears to have taken once more
to a wandering life, visiting various sanctuaries and shrines, living all the time the life of an
ascetic, eating dry bread, wearing rags, carrying a bag for his scanty provisions and a staff in his
hand, seeking to purify his soul by self-discipline and good works until, as his biographer says,
he became the " Pivot of Existence " (Qu(ib al-Wujud), a general blessing to all creatures and a
guide to the attainment of- the' satisfaction of the All-Merciful.2 It seems most probable
xJ that it was during this period that someone followed him, as he was wandering in the open
country, wearing a patched garment and carrying a water-jar and staff. Now that person had
previously seen him in his lecture-room, lecturing to an audience of three hundred students and a
hundred of the notables of Baghdad, and he' said : " O Imam, is not the work of teaching better
than this?" al-Ghazali looked at him with indifference and replied: ."When the full moon of
happiness has arisen, in the firmament of desire, then the sun of reason approaches the setting-
place of attainment," and he recited these verses
" I- abandoned the love of Layla and my happiness was afar off,
And I returned to the companionship of my fast halting-place.
And my desires called out to me, Gently, for these
Are the stations,of one whom you love, go slowly, alight."
I had-spun..a- fine thread for them .and I did not find
A wearer for my thread, so I broke my spindle." -
It was probably during this period of wandering that be paid a visit to Hamadan, and we are told
that he had as his companion while wandering, Ably Tahir al-Shabbak (called also al-Shaybanit
a fellow-pupil of the Imam al-Haramayn.
al-Ghazali now returned to his own country and for a time was teaching in Baghdad and
lecturing on the Ikya, though evidently still living a life of semi-retirement. He established
himself also as a preacher and " spoke with the tongue of those who have attained to the Truth."
He no longer based his teaching on the authority of others, nor did he rely for his instruction on
the Traditions. He was now engaged in, calling men to repentance,
Cf. H. Gtsche, p. 248. Subkl, Tab. IV, p. 105.
i Ibid.
s Dlunkwi, al-Kaadkib, fols. i94b, t95a. Afi'pnr al-'Ilm (Tarjania).
p. is.
AL-GHAZALI'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY
9
1
urging them to turn their backs on this world, and to prepare for the journey to the world to
come, seeking guidance for themselves from those who were possessed of gnosis and the Divine
enlightenment. 1 It is said that one day his brother Ahmad came to him and recited these verses
You have sought to guide others and have not guidance yourself,
Men listen to your preaching but you do not listen to theirs, 0 whetstone, how lpng will you
sharpen iron, And yet not receive a cutting edge yourself ? "2
It was perhaps on account of this fraternal rebuke, added to his own sense of unworthiness, that
al-Ghazali became dissatisfied with himself as a preacher. Ibn Sam'anf quotes a letter of his to
Abu Hamid A. b. Salamat in which he writes : " I do not think myself worthy to preach, for
preaching is like a tax and the property on which it is levied is the acceptance of the moral for
oneself. How, then, can anyone who has no property pay a tax ? How shall one who has no
garment himself clothe another ? When is the. shadow straight, if the wood is crooked ?" 8
Abu Said al-Nawgani 4 related that while attending al-Ghazali's
lectures on the 1'hya he heard him recite these verses
He has made their native lands dear unto men, Places wherein their hearts long to be
When men remember their homes, they are mindful
Of childish days there and they yearn for return."
And then al-Ghazali wept and his hearers wept with him.8
Once again he gave up his work at Baghdad and retired to Tus, living a life of seclusion,
occupying himself with reflection and his spiritual state, aiming at guidance and spiritual help for
each one who sought him out and visited him. Then, after a time he began to write again and
produced a number of books.
r Subkr, Tab. IV, p. 105. When u these
Ibcaf, p. 8 Ibn Khallikin attributes similar verses to Ibn T6mart. ~4hen they bade thee were
they lent them your assistance,
How often did you forbid them to thee re n indifference
How often did you admonish sonsin) were we not obeyed. Whetstone (of others' wit), howyet
gwiu you sharpen heeded.
a ' 5ubkedge yourself? Riog. Diet., III, p. 21 n steel and never receive
jab. IV, p. 112.
Ibid., p. 63.
i Ibid., p. 112.
At this time his manner of life met with general approval and his authority was unquestioned.
This state of things continued until Fakhr al-Mulk Jamal al-Shuhada became Vizier and
established his court and retinue in Khurasan ; he heard where al-Ghazali was living and was
informed of his high reputation and his great learning and the spiritual state to which he attained,
in the purity of his faith, and his manner of life. So Fakhr al-Mulk sought for a blessing from him
and visited him and listened to his teaching, and then besought him not to let his rare qualities
and gifts remain fruitless, without profit to others, giving no light from their radiance. The Vizier
used every importunity and pressed al-Ghazali until at last he agreed to go, and was carried off to
Nishapur, where he was appointed as lecturer in the Maymuna Nizamiyya College, being unable
to escape from the pressure put upon him by the Government. This was irk 4q_q_[_iio6-7. al-
Ghazali himself considered that this was the will of God, Who had aroused the desire of Fakhr
al-Mulk, in order that al-Ghazali should combat the decay of faith among Muslims. He felt also
that the desire for peace and protection from worldly persecution were not sufficient motives to
justify him in persisting in a life of solitude. Furthermore, he had consulted a number of
spiritually-minded men, possessed of vision, and they were unanimous in advising him to quit
his life of seclusion and go forth from his retreat. In addition to this, a number of these pious men
had dreams which confirmed their decision, and indicated that God had predetermined this event
for the beginning of the century (A.H. 500). " For God Most High," writes al-Ghazali, " had
promised a revival of religion at the beginning of every century." So he hoped that this was his
God-given task and he went to Nishapur with this purpose in view. " The impulse was not from
myself, but from God and it was not I who acted, but He Who made me act. I asked Him,
therefore, first to make me regenerate and then to give regeneration to others through me : to
guide me unto the Truth and then to enable me to guide others thereto."'
His intention, then, was to give all the guidance he could to
r al•Mangidb, p. 3a.
others, by making known the results of his long meditation, and
to benefit those who sought him out, but without any return
to what he had abandoned, or allowing himself to be fettered
by the desire for reputation or controversy and disputation
with his opponents. Now, he was often attacked and opposed
and suffered calumny and slander and disparagement, but he
remained unmoved by it and was not concerned to reply to those
who cast aspersions upon him. Abu'l-Hasan 'Abd al-Ghafir
al-Farisi, who had known a7-Ghazali before his conversion and
his long absence from the world, found a great change in him
now. He saw nothing of his former corruption and his contemp
tuous attitude towards other men, whom he despised in his pride
and arrogance, being deluded by what he had been given of
eloquence and intellectual power and the opportunity for good
works, added to his desire for reputation and a high position.
He had now completely changed and was free from these defects.
'Abd al-Ghafir supposed at first that he was simply restraining
himself, but he was convinced, after investigating the matter,
that it was not so, but that the man had recovered his sanity
after being possessed by an evil spirit.
al-Ghazali used to talk to his disciples at night, of what had
happened to him, from the time when the nature of the journey
along the road to God was first revealed to him, and how he
attained to the mystic experience, after he had for so long been
absorbed in his studies, and had realised his superiority to others, in his teaching, and the ability
by which God had distinguished him in regard to all types of learning, and his capacity for
research and criticism, until at last he had freed himself from preoccupation with theory, apart
from practice and concern with the life to come, and what might help him thereto. So he had
betaken himself to the study of Sufism under al-Farmadhi.I They asked him then how he came to
be willing to leave his life of retirement in his own home and to return to Nishapiir when
summoned thither, and he justified his action by saying that his religion did not allow him to
reject the call and to deprive students of the benefit they might gain through his teaching.
1 Subkr, Tab. IV, pp. log, iog. Cf. also IV, p. 9 and p. 17 above. Yafi'i, op. ri' , f0?. 258a.
ATE-GHAZALT'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY 33
He felt it -was incumbent on him to communicate the truth and to give utterance to it. 'Abd al-
Ghafir felt that be was sincere in his explanation. A statement made by al-Ghazali in one of his
books has a bearing on this decision. He says there that the work of the teacher is to perfect the
hurn n heart, to adorn and purify it and to urge it to draw near to God. Teaching, therefore, is a
form of service to God Most High, a kind of vicegerency of God, and the most glorious of
vicegerencies, for God has given to the learned mart that. knowledge which is the most
distinctive of human attributes : he is, as it were, the treasurer of His most precious treasure, who
is given leave to expend it upon everyone who has need of it, and what rank is more glorious,
asks al-Ghazali; than that of the servant who is a mediator between God Himself and His
creatures, in bringing them near to Him, and showing then the way to salvation? 1 al-Ghazali
added that he gave up his teaching work, before it gave him up. a As noted above, he had to
suffer much opposition and calumny, and Fakhr al-Mulk, who might have protected him against
such attacks, was assassinated in A..x. 5oo/rtob-y. It was possibly at this time, not earlier, as his
biographers assume, that al-Ghazali thought of taking refuge in the West, with Yusuf'b. Tashfinf
the. Sultan of Morocco, of whose just administration he had heard (cf. P. 2I above), but hearing
of Yi suf's death, which occurred in this year, he abandoned the groject.r
He retired once more to his home in Tus and established a college for students of theology, close
by, and also a convent for Sufis. It must have been during this period that once again he was
summoned by the Grand Vizier al-Sa'id to take up teaching again in the Nizamiyya College in
Baghdad, but al-Ghazali
wrote him a decisive letter of refusal, reminding him that he had given up that same work, in
order to betake himself to a life of
devotion, for the sake of God and in accordance with His purpose.
He writes : " Know that men are divided into three groups,
in turning towards what is their Qfbla (the,: direction towards which all Muslims turn in prayer).
Fdtihat al-'Ufam, p. 7.
s Yafi'i, op. C it ff. 258a, 258b. Subkr, Tab. IV, iog.
a Subkl, Tab. IV, p. 104. Vafi'r, op, cit., fol. 256b. N
t
(a) The people at large, who limit their consideration to this
transient world, and of these the Prophet expressed his disapproval
when he said : "No wolves attacking the sheepfold are more
destructive to the faith of the Muslim than the love of wealth
and honour."
(b) The second are the elect, who give their chief attention
to the next world, knowing that it is more excellent and more
enduring than this, and they do good works for its sake, but the
Prophet showed how they are in error, when he said : " This
world is forbidden to those who belong to the next, and the next
is forbidden to those who belong to this, and both are forbidden
to those who belong to God Most High."
(c) The third are the elect of the elect, and they are those who
know that beyond everything is something else which belongs
to those that set, I and the wise man does not love that which
sets (i.e., is but transient). These are convinced that this world
and the world to come are but the creation of God and the most
important things in them are eating and pro-creation, which
are shared with the brutes and the reptiles and neither of the two represents a high rank.
Therefore they have turned away from both and turned towards their Creator, Who is the Author
of their being and their King. To them has been revealed the meaning of "God is more exalted
and abides,"' and they are convinced of the truth of : " There is no god but God," and none who
turns aside to what is other than Him is free from secret polytheism. For them all existent things
are divided into two, God and what is other than God. They have considered this under the
similitude of the two scales of a balance, and their heart is the tongue of that balance. Whenever
they see their hearts inclining towards what is noble and honourable, they judge that the scale is
weighted down by good works, and when they see their hearts inclining towards what is base,
they judge that the scale is weighted down by evil deeds.
As the first class are common in comparison with the second, so also the second class are
common in comparison with the third, and the three classes can be reduced to two. Therefore I
say that
t Sera VI, 6.
' SQra XX, ys.
the Chief Vizier has summoned me to descend from the higher rank to that which is lower and I,
for my part, summon him to ascend from the lower to the higher, which is the highest of the
high. The road which leads to God Most High, from Baghdad and from Tiffs and from every
other place, is one, no one of them is nearer than any other. Therefore I ask God to arouse him
from the sleep of heedlessness, so that he may consider the morrow while it is still to-day, before
the matter is taken out of his hands. So farewell." 1
During this. time in 'ins, al-Ghazaii was dividing up his time in the way best fitted to serve the
needs of those around him. He devoted himself to reading the Qur an, to studying the Traditions
afresh, to associating with the godly, to teaching work, and to prayer, so that he should not waste
a single moment of his own time or of the time of those with him, content now " to wait with
Love for Death's unhasting ,feet." " The mystic," he wrote, " is always mindful of death, because
he has been promised union with his Beloved and the lover never forgets such a promise. So he
desires the coming of death, in order that he may be delivered from this sinful world and be
transported
1 into the Presence of Him Who made the worlds. The highest stage is not to choose for oneself,
either life or death, but to desire most that which is most desired by his Lord," and he quotes the
words of the Sufi Shibli, as he lay dying, " The house in which Thou dwellest hass no need of a
lamp." 2 As the shadows lengthen, to look upon His Face is enough for His lover, who knows
that he is passing out of darkness into eternal light. So al-Ghazali passed his last days in
tranquillity, waiting, " until Time itself overtook him and the days withdrew the gift that had
been bestowed upon his generation and God Most High called him to the glory of His own
Presence." 3
He died on Monday the i4th of Jumada II, A.H. 505 (Dec. 18th, A.D. IIII), at the age of fifty-
three. His brother Ahmad relates that at dawn on the day of his death al-Ghazali performed his
ablutions and prayed and then said : " Bring me my shroud,"
IL Mi'y8r al-'Ilea (Tarja*aa), pp. II. as. Khwinskl,.Raa4dl al-Jaankl, p. req.
• Ihya, IV, p. +30.
• Subkt, Tab. I , p. 109. YA6'l, OP. Cit. fol. 258b.
and taking it, he kissed it and laid it over his eyes and said " Most gladly. do I enter into the
Presence of the King, and he
stretched odt his feet and went forth to meet Him, and so passed into the Paradise of God, "
worthy of all honour, of loftier station than the stars, giving more guidance to men than the full
moon when darkness has fallen."' He was buried outside
labaran., in a grave near that of the poet Firdawsi, and Ibn al-Sam'anl records that he visited his
grave there.
There is a story to the effect that when al-Ghazali fell ill and felt that his death was approaching,
he sent away those who were with him and no one entered his presence until the next morning,
when they went in as he had bidden them and they found him facing the Qibla, clad in his
shroud, dead, and at his head they found a sheet of paper bearing these verses
" Sa to my friends, when they look dpon me, dead, Weeping for me and mourning me in sorrow
Do' ot believe that this corpse you see is myself. In the name of God, I tell you, it is not I, I am a
spirit, and this is naught but flesh It was my abode and my garment for a time. I am a treasure, by
a talisman kept hid, Fashioned of dust, which served me as a shrine, I am a pearl, which has left
its shell deserted, It was my prison, where I spent my time in grief. I am a bird, and this body
was my cage
Whence I have now flown forth and it is left as a token, Praise be to God, Who bath now set me
free,
And prepared for me my place in the highest of the heavens. Until to-day I was dead, though
alive in your midst. Now I live in truth, with the grave-clothes discarded. To-day I hold converse
with the saints above, Now, with no veil between, I see God face to face. I look upon the Tablet
2 and therein I read, Whatever was and is and all that is to be. Let my house fall in ruins, lay my
cage in the ground, Cast away the talisman, 'tis a token, no more. Lay aside my cloak, it was but
my outer garment. Place them all in the grave, let them be forgotten. I have passed on my way
and you are left behind. Your place of abode was no dwelling-place for me.
• MunAwf, op. cit., fol. 195 4. Mi'var al-'Ilm (Tarjama), p, 13.
dab. IV, p. 106.
• al-Law-(1 al-ma lfus.
A ALT' E AND PERSONALITY 37
Think no is death, nay, it is life,
A life that s es all we could dream of here, While in this world. Here we are granted sleep,
Death is but sleep, sleep that shall be prolonged. Be not affrighted when death draweth nigh, It is
but the departure for this blessed home. Think of the mercy and love of your Lord, Give thanks
for His grace and come without fear. What I am now, even so shall you be, For I know that you
are even as I am. The souls of all men came forth from God, The bodies of all are compounded
alike Good and evil, alike it was ours.
I give you now a message of good cheer
May God's peace and jov for evermore be yours." 1
There were many elegies composed in honour of al-Ghazali after his death, the most famous
being that of the poet Abu'lMuzaffer al-Abiwardi (Ob. 507 X1113). z The Imam Isma'il al-
Hakimi 3 also expressed his grief in lines taken from one of the most celebrated qasidas of Abu
Tammam 4
" I wondered how to endure it, when deprived of him by death,
I, who shed tears of blood, when he was away from me,
But these are times when so much seems strange,
That we have ceased to wonder thereat."5
One of al-Ghazali's pupils, the well-known Sufi Abu'l-'Abbas al-Alishi composed verses in
praise of both his teacher and his teacher's masterpiece, the Ibya.I
It is related that just after al-Ghazali's death, Abu'l-'Abbas Ahmad b. Abi'l-Khayr al-Yamani,
known as al-Sayyad, had a vision. He was sitting at the open gates of Heaven and lo, a band of
angels were descending to the earth, bearing robes of
1 Brit. Mus. Add. 76561. Murtada, op. cit., p. 43. These verses have been attributed to Ahmad al-
Ghazali, but certain of them are found in Abu Hamid's Tahasin al-Zunun, It is related that
Suhrawardi al-'%Iagtul (ob. 587/1191)
recited some of these lines shortly before his death. Cf. von. Kremer. Gesch. der Nerrs. Ideen des
Islams, pp. 132, 133.
YSqut, Georg. Worterbuch (Iilu'jam al-B ddan) III. p. 561; Qazwini,
Athar al-Bilad, II, p. 278. Subkl, op. cit.. IV, p. 115.
3 Cf, p. 63 below.
• Abu Tammam Habib b. Aws, a distinguished poet who died c. A.A. 850, the author of the
.Iamasa.
• M. Rida, op. cit., p- 26. Ibn KhaI!ikan, op. cit., II, p. 623
- Yafm'f, op. cit., fol. 257a. Mi'yar al-'Ibn (Tarjanral, p. 13 Khwdnsari, Rautilt al-Jaunt, p. 184,
Subki,
honour, green in colour, and with them a noble steed. They alighted at the head of a certain tomb
and brought one forth from his grave, and having invested him with the robes, set him on that
steed, and ascended with him to the heavens, continuing to ascend with him from one heaven to
another until he had passed through all the Seven Heavens' and, ascending beyond them, he
traversed the Seventy Veils.' " I was filled with wonder at that," said Abu'l-'Abbas, " and I
desired to know who that rider was, and I was told : " It is al-Ghazali," and I did not know then,
that he had attained to martyrdom." a It is said that al-Ghazali occupied the position of Qu;b, the
supreme head of the Sufr hierarchy, for a period of threee days.'
It is also related that someone saw al-Ghazali, after his death, in a dream and asked about his
state and he replied : " If it were not for this 'strange' knowledge, all would be well with us." His
biographer is anxious that no one should imagine that "this strange knowledge " should be
interpreted to mean the mystical knowledge of al-Ghazali. This, he holds, would be a Satanic
device to prevent others from following in al-Gbazali's. steps and would mean that they were
veiled from God and hindered from attaining to the highest degreee of saint-hood. He interprets
the words to mean that, since it was a celestial vision, of one now in the Presence of God, no
longer concerned with the things of sense, the " strange knowledge " was that which was
concerned only with this world, with human affairs and relationships, which could have no
bearing whatever on life in the world to come, for death means separation front them. So perhaps
al-Ghazali regretted having concerned himself with the worldly knowledge which was strange to
the heavenly places. But his biographer points out that the knowledge of the mysteries of
devotion and what belongs to the world to come could not be " strange " to one who had attained
to that world, therefore he urges his readers not to misinterpret these words, lest they be
1 Cf. pp. no ff below.
• Cf, pp. z47'ff. below.
• Subkl, op. cit., IV, p. '4x.
" The station of the Q. r.,^~ is the station of Perfect Manhood-his due title is Director of Souls
and he is a blessing to those who invoke his aid, because he comprehends the innate capacities of
all mankind and, like a camel-driver, speeds everyone to his home." R. A. Nicholson, The
Mystics of Islam, p. 165.
.4L-GHAZALI'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY 39
hindered from seeking spiritual knowledge, but to acquire of worldly knowledge only as much as
was really necessary.'
A number of other visions of al-Ghazali after his death are mentioned by his biographers.'
Miraculous gifts (karamcU) were also ascribed to him as to all the great saints of Islam.
A
1 Munawl, op. cit., fol. ig8b.
' Cf. Qazwinl, op. Cit., Pp. 277, 278. YaL'!, Mie al-Janan, fols. 2S9a, bJam!, of. cit., pp. 423,
424. Subk1, Tab, pp. zz6, 131, 132. Munawi, fol. 9Sa.
CHAPTER III
al-Ghazdli's Character and Personality. His sociability.
His love of travel. His fondness for and knowledge of.
animals and Plants.
There is much that may be learned of al-Ghazali's character
and personality from what we know of his life, and still more
from his own writings. His eager curiosity and desire to investi
gate all branches of knowledge, his intellectual pride and self
confidence, were qualities natural to one possessed of such out
standing gifts, and natural to his youth, but there were other more
essential and more lasting traits which are revealed as being
more truly characteristic of him. He seems to have been
sociable and fond of company and given to hospitality. It is good to eat in company, he observes,
for it will mean friendly and profitable conversation during meals. He was probably a chess-
player, for he remarks that when a man is an expert at chess, he rejoices in the game and if he is
kept from it for a time, he will not give it up and cannot endure to be deprived of it. He observes
also that one who is expert at the game is prepared to sacrifice his castle and his knight, without
hesitation, in order to win the game, while the uninstructed spectator laughs at him and is
surprised at his action. Elsewhere he notes that the expert at chess, for all its baseness (i.e., it is
only a game) cannot refrain from instructing others in it and speaking about his own moves,
because of the pleasure he takes in his knowledge and skill in the game. 1
Sociability he considers to be one of the marks of an attractive character and the unsociable man
will be found to have an unpleasant personality. An attractive personality naturally secures
affection and friendship and good relations with others, while an evil character produces dislike
and jealousy and quarrels. " The believer both gives and receives friendship and there is no good
in anyone who does neither." al-Ghazali quotes the
1 Kfmiva at-Sa'uda, p. 18. Ihya, IV, pp. 321, 264.
AL-GHAZALI'S LIFE AND PERSOWALITY 41
Prophet's saying that when God wishes well to anyone He gives that one a good friend who, if he
is neglectful, remembers him, and if he is mindful, helps him. The Prophet said that two friends
meeting together were like two hands, one of which washes the other, and he also said : " To
certain people it will be granted to sit around the Throne of God on the Day of resurrection and
their faces will shine like the moon, on the night when it is full. Others will flee in terror, but
they will remain, and other will fear, but they will be unafraid. These are the friends of God
"upon whom there shall be no fear, neither shall they grieve," 1 who are clothed in light and the
prophets and martyrs desire to be of their number. The radiance of their beauty is manifest to the
Blessed in Paradise, even as the light of the sun, and it is written upon their foreheads that they
are " Those who love one another in God." Y
There were five qualities which al-Ghazali thought to be desirable in a friend who was to be a
real companion in intellectual interests, in religion and in worldly affairs,. and all five of these
qualities were conspicuous in al-Ghazali. himself.' The first quality was that of intelligence, he
considered that there was no good to be derived from the companionship of the foolish, which
.which would end only in alienation and separation, An intelligent enemy, he thinks, is better
than a foolish friend. The second quality is an attractive disposition, and by an unpleasant
character al-Ghazali means that of a man who is lacking in selfcontrol, who gives way to anger
and to lust. The third is a high moral standard, no friendship is to be sought with an evil-doer,
who persists in deadly sin. The fourth is freedom from greed, for the company of one who
desires this world's goods is deadly poison, and the fifth is sincerity, for the man who cannot be
trusted is " like a mirage which makes what is distant seem near to you, and what is near to seem
far away." Friends are of three types, he observes, the one with whom you have fellowship in
religion, the one whose company you seek in worldly affairs, and the one whose company you
avoid as evil and a temptation. The first is like food, which is indispensable to life, the second is
1 Sura II, 36.
2 1hya, II, PP. 6, 138 ff.
J. t:
like medicine, necessary at one time, but not at another, and the
third like disease, for which there is no need at all. 1
People on the whole, al-Ghazali adds, are like trees and plants,
some of which give shade but bear no fruit, for example, the
friend who is a help to you for this life, but not for the next
what is of benefit in this life is like the shade which quickly
passes away. Some trees bear fruit, but give no shade, like a
friend who gives you help in regard to the world to come, but not
in the affairs of this world, and there are some plants which give
neither fruit nor shade, such as the mimosa (Egyptian thorn),
Which tears the clothes and produces neither food nor drink." 2
al-Ghazali had a high ideal of the duties involved in friendship, which in his view included
silence .and speech, each in its due time. Friendship, he held, must be based on fidelity and
single-minded sincerity, -and fidelity meant not' only continual regard for a friend until his death,
but also,,after his death, for his children and his friends. He quotes his master al-Shafi'r who
wrote of his friendship with M, b. 'Abd al-Hakim :
My friend fell sick and I visited him,
Then I fell sick from my anxiety for him.
And my friend then came to visit me
And I was cured by looking upon him."s
While commending the custom of visiting the shrines of the saints,
to seek a blessing, he expresses the view that, in general, visiting
the living is more meritorious than visiting the dead.
From contact with others is learnt courtesy and understanding and the meaning of the good life in
relation to God and one's fellows, an experience which cannot be realised in solitude.
Unsociability may be a form of pride : al-Ghazali tells the story
V of an Israelite who wrote three hundred and sixty books on different types of knowledge
(hikma) and supposed that'he had won the Divine approval for his work, but he received.a
prophetic message, saying : " Thou hast filled the earth with hypocrisy, I will have none of it."
So the Israelite retired into an underground cave and thought that by so doing he.had secured
what he sought, but there came another message to say that he could
Bidr+yatal-H152ya, PP. 41. 42. Tyd, 11, pp. 150, 151. Ibid., p. 165.
I
AL-GIAZALI'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY 43
not expect the Divine approval unless he mixed with men and endured tribulation from them. So
he went forth into the markets and mixed with men and sat with them and fed them and ate with
them and walked with them, and then at last came the message : "Now hast thou attained to My
good pleasure." 1
We should judge that al-Ghazali was generous and hospitable, from the accounts given of his
large household, and from his own expression of deep admiration for these qualities. He quotes
the words of the Prophet : " Generosity brings us near to God and to man and to Paradise," and
again : " Generosity is one of the trees of Paradise, the branches of which hang down to the earth
and he who takes hold of one of its branches can climb thereby up to Paradise." He quotes also
the saying of lbn Sammak : z " I marvel at one who buys slaves (i.e., for the purpose of
manumission), with his wealth, and does not buy free men with his kindness." He also quotes the
lines
" You belong to wealth if you retain it,
But when you spend it, wealth belongs to you."
He tells with approval a story, comparable to that of the Widow's Mite, related by Abu'l-Hasan,
of how al-Hasan and al-Husayn, the Prophet's grandsons, and 'Abdallah. b. Ja'far$ went on
pilgrimage, and, having lost their baggage, suffered from hunger and thirst. They came upon an
old woman, in a tent of camel's hair, and asked her for something to drink. She had one ewe
lying under the lower flaps of the tent and she bade them milk it and mix water with the milk.
They asked them if she had anything to eat. She replied : " Nothing except this ewe. Let one of
you slaughter her and I will prepare you something to eat." Then one of them killed the ewe and
skinned it and the old woman prepared food for them and they ate and rose up to depart. When
they set off, they told her that they were people of the Quraysh and if they returned in safety, she
should come to them and they would deal kindly with her.
They went their way, and when her husband returned and she told him what had happened, he
was angry and exclaimed
1 I4yd, II, p. 213,
3 Ob. 1831799.80. Cf. Ibn Khallikan, III, pp. 18 ff. Ob. 80)699-700. Cf. Ibn Khailikan, III, p.
627.
44 AL-GHAZALj'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY
" Woe be unto you, you have killed my ewe for strangers whom
you assert to belong to the Quraysh." Shortly afterwards
destitution forced, them to go intb the city, where the man was
reduced to collecting dung and selling it, so that they might live
on the proceeds. One day, as the old woman was passing
throughh one of the streets of the city, Hasan, sitting at the door
of his house, recognised her, though she did not know him, and
he sent his servant to bring her to him, when he said : " I was
your guest on such and such a day." Then she rejoined : " You
are my father, and my mother." He then gave orders that one
thousand ewes should be brought for her from the sheep of the
tithe,' and that she should also be given one thousand dinars,
and he sent her with her servant to Husayn. The latter asked
her what his brother had given her and when she told him,
Husayn commanded that she should be given a similar amount
from himself and then sent her with his servant to 'Abdallah b.
Ja'far, who asked her how much Hasan and Ijusayn had given
her. She said : " Two thousand ewes and two thousand dinars,"
and 'Abdallah gave orders that she should be given another
two thousand ewes and two thousand dinars, and observed to
her : "If you had begun with me, I would have wearied them
both (i.e., in.,equalling my gift)." So the old woman returned
to her husband with four thousand ewes and four thousand
dinars. 2
Having travelled widely himself, al-Ghazali has much to say
of the advantages of travel, especially on the human side.
Perhaps there is a personal reminiscence of early fears, in his statement that " a certain one" who
was conscious of cowardice and faintheartedness within himself, and desired to make himself
courageous, used to sail on " the sea " (possibly the Tigris, since most great rivers in the East are
called" the sea " by those who live near them, up to the present day), in winter, when the waves
were disturbed. 3 Travel may be of great advantage, he thinks, to those who are mature enough
to reap the benefit, but not for the young, as it is likely to make them idle and
2 ' The Za/at or alms-tithe levied in kind on the Muslim's possessions, eluding animals, and
devoted to charitable gifts. Ihya, III, p. zt6.
Ihya, III, P. 54.
disinclined to settle down to work. For those who are fitted for it, travel means an increase in
knowledge. " Flowing water is good, but stagnant water loses its goodness." The traveller who
visits other places, sees their scenery, mountains and deserts and oceans, and all kinds of animals
and plants, and these remind him that their Maker is One. He also meets with other men, the
learned and the saints, and this is profitable and may induce the traveller to imitate them. Travel,
too, serves as a convenient means, as -it had done for al-Ghazali himself, of escaping from
disturbances to religion, e.g., position and authority and other hindrances : it enables the heart to
be at leisure from itself. But al-Ghazali's fondness for company is suggested by his
recommendation not to travel alone, but to choose a good companion, " First the companion,
then the road." r
al-Ghazali advocated tolerance and charity towards others and we have the evidence of his
friends that he practised these virtues in his mature years. He expressed his disapproval of
slander not only because it might cause pain if overheard, but because it was finding fault with
God's handiwork, for God created mankind and their qualities and their actions and their
characters and these therefore ought not to be blamed.' al-Ghazali also commends the advice to
speak no harsh word to others without a kind word to follow it. The only way to get rid of envy
is to look upon all men, whether in a good or an evil state, as being the same fellow human
beings, and this state of mind will not come about so long as any attention is paid to this world's
goods. A man must needs " become absorbed' in the love of God Most High, like one intoxicated
and beside
himself, so that his heart at last pays no attention to the different
states of men, but he regards all with one eye and that is the eye
of compassion, whereby he sees all to be the servants of God
and their actions to be the actions of God and all under His
control, but this state occurs but briefly, it does not last." 3
To show the lengths to which he felt that charity and kindness
I Ihya, 11, pp. z2S ff. Cf. the saying of Rabi'a al-'Adawiyya of Basra, quoted by al-Ghazali
himself, " First the neighbour, then the house." 11iya, IV,
p. 269.
Cf. Acts, X, 25. "what God bath cleansed, make not thou common."
Ihya, III, p. 273.

i
to others should be carried, he tells a Franciscan story of how
'Abdallah b. 'Umarl did not hesitate to eat with those suffering
from elephantiasis, and how he gathered the lepers and the
afflicted and made them sit at his table.2
al-Ghazali carried his spirit of tolerance to notable lengths
when asked whether it was not legal to curse the Caliph Yazid
b. Mu'awiya, who was generally regarded as responsible for the
death of the Prophet's grandson Husayn at the battle of Karbala
(6r /68o), 3 and his name held in execration by most Muslims.
But al-Ghazali replied that it was absolutely forbidden to curse
a Muslim and he who did so was himself accursed. " How
should be be allowable to curse a Muslim," he asks, " when it is
not permitted to curse the beasts of the field, and we have been
prohibited from doing sd ? . . . Now, it is certain that Yazid
was a Muslim, but it is not certain that he slew IIusayn or
that he ordered or consented to, his death, and as long as these
circumstances remain uncertain, it is not allowable to believe

that he acted so. Besides, it is forbidden to think ill of a Muslim.,
since God has said : " Be not ready to entertain suspicions of
another, for it may be that these suspicions are a sin." 4 The
Prophet has declared that the blood, the wealth and the reputa
tion of the Muslim are sacred and of him no ill should be thought.
Moreover, if any person asseit that Yazid ordered Husayn's death or consented to it, he gives
thereby a proof of his extreme folly, for were he to endeavour to discover the true circumstances
of the death of such great men, viziers and sultans, as perished in his time he would not succeed
not even if the murder were perpetrated in his neighbourhood and his presence. And how can he
know the truth (of Yazid's conduct), now that four hundred years have elapsed, and that crime
was committed in a place far remote ? . . . the true circumstances of it cannot therefore be known
and such being the case, it is incumbent on us to think well of every Muslim who can possibly
deserve it.... Suppose that there be positive proof of one Muslim having
' Ob. 931692.3, one of the most eminent of the Companions, who devoted himself to the
religious life.
' 14ya, III, p. 306.
Cf. R. A. Nicholson, Literary History of the Arabs, pp. 196 ff., Ya2Id himself was not resent at
the battle.
r4 S~ira, XLIX, i
AL-GHAZALI'S LIFE AND PERSONALI`T'Y 47
murdered another; -the judgment of those whose authority is to be accepted is that the murderer
may not be cursed, because the act itself is not an act of infidelity, but of disobedience to God. It
may also happen that the murderer repents, before he dies. If an infidel be converted from his
infidelity, it is not allowable to curse him how much the less, then, is it allowable to curse him
who repents of having committed murder ? Besides, how can it be known that the murderer of
Husayn died unrepentant ? " And he accepteth the repentance of his servants." 1 Wherefore,
inasmttch as it is not lawful to curse a Muslim after his death4 he who curses him is a reprobate
and disobedient to God.... 'Accursed are those who are alienated from God Almighty,' but who
those may be is a mystery, except in the case of such persons as die infidels.... As for the
invocation of the Divine mercy on Yazid, it is allowable, nay acceptable . . . in fact, it is included
in those words which we titter in every prayer,
• 0 God, pardon the men and women who believe,' for Yazid was a believer. God knows if
my opinion be right." 2
It was at least the opinion of one who would be neither unjust nor intolerant in his judgment of
others, who had the moral courage to express a conviction which was likely to incur the criticism
and hostility of others. 3 al-Ghazali was tolerant even of the religious views of those who were
not of his faith and urged that a Christian's teaching should be tolerated except where it
conflicted directly with the tenets of Islam.'
With this charity towards other men was associated a sense of humility and of his own
unworthiness which, in his more mature years, replaced the intolerant pride of his youth. al-
Ghazali held that for any man to regard anotherr as worse than himself was really pride and he
tells a story of the humility of the Caliph 'Umar b. 'Ahd al-'Aziz, s to whom a visitor came one
night when he was writing and the lamp had almost gone out. So the guest asked if 'he might
replerish it. The Caliph replied
• It is no honour to a man to let his guest do a servant's work."
1 Sara IX, 105.
• Ibn KhallikIn, Biig. Dict., II,'pp. 23o ff.
• Cf. Khwinsdrf, Raw4dt aI Jpnat, p: 182,
at-Mungidh, p. 13. .
• Reigned A.D. 717-720, a just ruler who was both philosopher and saint,
The guest asked then if he should rouse the servant-boy, who was sleeping, but the Caliph would
not allow it, saying that the boy was enjoying his first sleep. Then he himself rose and fetched
the leather bottle and filled the lamp with oil. His visitor said : " Was it for you to rise and do it
for yourself, 0 Commander of the Faithful ? " The Caliph replied : " I was 'Umar when I went
and 'Umar when I returned. I have lost nothing. The best of men is he who humbles himself in
the sight of God."'
al-Ghazali relates another story in praise of modesty, a quality conspicuous in himself in his later
years, of how the preacher
Ibn al-Sammak entered the presence of Hariin al-I2ashid 2 and
said to him : " 0 Commander of the Faithful, your humility in regard to your high rank is more
honourable to you than your rank." Haran replied : " That is well said." The preacher continued :
" 0 Commander of the Faithful, if God creates
a man with goad looks and of high li
,neage and wealthy and that
wealth an is modest in regard to his appearance and munificent with
hism and humble in regard to his lineage, then he is written
down in the Divine record among the purest of God's saints."
Then Harun called for ink-horn and paper and wrote it down
with his own hand. 3
al-Ghazali was not only a lover of his fellow-men but of the
humbler creation. He had obviously a great fondness for
animals, taking a great interest in them and their habits, and plainly very observant of them, He
does not seem to have shared the usual Muslim prejudice against dogs. He commends the fidelity
of the watch-dog, which is ready to sacrifice itself and its sleep, for the sake of its master, and he
points out the value of the dog, both for protection and for hunting. 4 He has several stories to
tell of dogs, among these, of how someone found Malik b. Dinar4 sitting by himself, with a dog
which had put its muzzle on his knee. This officious person wished to drive the dog away, but
Malik would not allow it, saying : " Let it alone, it does no harm and it is better than an evil
companion."4 He tells also
' I hya, III, pp. 207- 208.
'Abbasid Caliph, reigned AD86 8 .. 7,09.
Iiya, IC, p. 29,5.
" al-Hikmal ft fllukhhigdt
Allah, P 4
fhya, 1I 3•
s fib. 527/741, a famous ascetic of Basra , p. zo8.
a story of 'Abdallah b. Ja'far, who went out one day to one of. his estates and alighted at a,
certain palm-grove, where a black slave was working. His food was brought to him and shortly
afterwards a dog entered the garden, whereupon the slave threw it a loaf of bread, then a second
and then a third. 'Abdallah looked at him and said : " 0 slave, how much food have you each
day? " The slave answered : "What you have seen." 'Abdallah asked why he had preferred the
dog to himself, and he said : " He had come a long journey and was hungry and I was unwilling
to satisfy my appetite, while he went hungry."
But what will you do to-day ? " asked 'Abdallah, and the slave replied : " I shall go hungry to-
day." So that the slave-boy should not outdo him in generosity, 'Abdallah b. Ja'far bought the
garden and the slave-boy, and the tools in it, and set the boy free and presented him with the
garden.'
al-Ghazali was evidently fond of cats, too, and perhaps had a favourite of his own, for he speaks
of one who has an eye for beauty being able to find it in his own domestic cat, and he was
thinking, no doubt, of the grace of its form and movements. = He also tells a story of how the
Sufi al-Shibli found Abu'lIjusayn Mr! 3 at prayer, absolutely still and concentrated, without any
bodily mpivement at all, and al-Shibli asked him afterwards how he had attained to this degree of
meditation and stillness, and Nuri replied : " I learnt it from a cat we had when she was seeking
her prey, she used to establish herself above the mouse-hole and never stirred a hair." 4 al-
Ghazali was indignant over cruel treatment of animals, especially of those who did service to
men, and in this connection he quotes the saying of Abu Darda. 5 : "Fear God and beware of
men, for they never ride on a camel's back without galling it, nor on the back of a swift horse
without laming it." ° He gives advice to the traveller which, we may be sure, he had observed
himself
r Ihyd, III, p. 220.
2 Ihyd, III, p. 41. While the cat, in the East, is often a neglected household drudge, expected to
secure its own food, in other cases it is cherished as a pet, e.g., the traditiunist Abu Hurayra
received his nickname (Father of a Kitten), because of his habit of carrying a favourite kitten
about with him.
' Cf. my Early Mystic of Baghdad, pp. 31 ff.' IhY4, IV, PP- 340, 341
5 One of the Companions of the Prophet, a nctcd ascetic. ' i1A.98, II, p. 209.
50. AL-GHAZALI'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY
on his own travels, urging him to be merciful to his beast and not
overload it or beat it in the face, which is forbidden, nor should
sleep upon it, for " he becomes heavy in sleep " and the beast
he
will be Injured by his weight. Godfearing folk, al-Ghazali
observes, do not sleep upon their beasts, except for a short nap.
The Prophet himself said : "Do not regard the backs of your
animals as seats." It is desirable to dismount at least in the
morning and evening and give the animal a rest thereby. It is laid down in the Canon Law that if
any man injures a beast by beating or overloading it, that will be required at his hand on the Day
of Judgment. It is related that Abu Darda said to a camel of his when it was dying, " 0 camel, do
not accuse me to thy. Lord, for I have not overloaded thee." To dismount for an hour serves a
double purpose, for it is a benefit to the beast and also to its rider, enabling him to stretch his
limbs. 1
al-Ghazaji was equally interested in birds and their ways, and he frequently refers to them in his
writings. He may himself have kept pigeons, as it was a common custom to keep doves
of many colours about the palaces of the great, and he must
surely have been speaking from personal experience when he
refers to the pigeon-fancier, who will stand on his feet all day
in the burning sun, and does not feel the heat to be trying,
because of his delight in the birds and their movements in flight,
as he watches them soaring and wheeling about in the vault of
the heavens.2
He quotes as fitting and beautiful the lines
" The dove coos in the watches of the night,
Perched on a branch, while I lie here asleep.
I have lied, r swear it, when I said I was a lover,
For the doves surpass me in their lamentation,
While I assert that I am beside myself with lovq
To my Lord, but I weep not, while even the doves lament."
He commends the cock, too, for its praiseworthy energy, in re
peating the Prophet's words : " There are three sounds dear
to God Most High, the voice of the cock (when it crows at dawn),
and the voice of him who recites the Qur'an, and the voice of those
who ask for forgiveness at the break of day." He also quotes
Ibyj, II, p. 226.
4Y4, 111, p. 51.
AL-GHAZALI'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY 53:
the saying of the wise man Luqman, to his son, " 0 my son, let not the cock outdo you in greeting
the dawn, while you are still asleep." 1 He was perhaps interested in falconry also, for he advises
men to treat the lower self as the falcon is treated when it is to be trained and its hostility to man
and its wild nature subdued to obedience and discipline. *It must be confined at first th a dark
building, with its eyes covered, in order that it may be weaned from its habits of flying in the
heavens, until it has forgotten the natural freedom to which it was accustomed. It must be treated
kindly and fed with meat, so that it becomes familiar with its owner and grows accustomed to his
presence, so that when he calls it, it comes to him and when it hears his voice, it returns to him, 2
There is a story related of al-Ghazali by Muhyi al-Din Ibn al-'Arab! (cf. pp. tog ff. below) which
shows again his interest in birds. Once, when he was in Jerusalem, he saw a -crow and a pigeon
associating with each other and he said when he saw it " Their association with each other must
be due to some bond of kinship," and he pointed to them. They moved away and behold, both of
them were lame. 2
al-Ghazali refused to condemn the practice adopted by some of the Sufis of spending the night
with wild beasts in the wilderness, in order to show their trust in God and His care for them, a
custom which his critics thought was to be regarded as tempting Providence. It may be that al-
Ghazali himself had personal experience of the practice : at any rate he appears to have held the
view that the saints had the power so to subdue and tame wild beasts that they' could ride upon
them, and rub their ears, and the creatures would obey them. 4 He writes that it is the mark of the
saint that he has the power to tame wild creatures and beasts of prey, and the lions and other wild
beasts love him, and the lions " wag their tails for him." He tells a+ story of Ibrahim al-Raggi, 5
who visited Abu'l-Khayr al-Tinati ° and found him reading the Fatiha, and as he went out for his
I Khuld$al al-Tapinif fi'l-TaFawuwf, pp. 11, 12.

2 1hyd, 111. P. 51.
1 al-hfun3wl, op. ci... fol. 195 a. Cf. also Ikyd, II, 6 Murtada, Iliidf, p. 35. Minhdj al-'Abid1n, p.
go.
06. 3421953.
s Cf. Sarrdj, K1tdb al-Luma', pp- 234, 317.
6
P. 143.
52 AL-GHAZALT'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY
ablutions before prayer, he met a lion and turned back in fear,
and told his host what had befalen him. Thereupon Abu'l
Khayr went out and called to the lion : Did I not tell you not
to attack my guests ? " and the lion turned away. al-Raggi
then performed his ablutions and returned, and Abu'l-Khayr
observed to him : " You were engaged in adjusting outward
things and we were occupied in adjusting inward things, and so
we were able to make the lion afraid."' It is related also of the
woman Snff Rabi'a of Basra that the wild creatures-deer,
gazelle, mountain goats, and wild asses, used to gather round her,
unafraid and doing her no harm. 2
al-Ghazali had also an interest in, and affection for, plants
and flowers and frees, which suggests that he was a garden-lover,
and like most dwellers in the East, he must have spent much time
in his garden, and this, like other Eastern gardens, would include fruit-trees, grown as much for
their blossom as their fruit, and water in the form of streams or fountains. He evidently gave
close attention to the habits of plants. This is clear from the observations he makes in his
writings. He speaks of rejoicing in the sight of different kinds of fruit with their varied forms and
colours, and the beauty of the flowers and blossom and the ruddy apple, and the joy of looking
upon green things and running water. On the other hand, he knows something of the difficulties
of a gardener in a land where rain falls infrequently and irrigation is necessary. He speaks of the
water hidden beneath the dust and the dry clay and how it can be discovered and utilised by the
digging of conduits, which is easier than the transport of water
from a distance. The joy of the gardener in the advent of rain
long-desired is shown in his quotation of the words of Luqman :
" 0 my son, associate with the learned and approach them with
great humility, for hearts are given life by wisdom, as the dead
earth is given life by heavy showers of rain." 6 He mentions
the tree which grows of itself and receives no care, which very
soon withers away, or if it does survive-for a time, bears leaves
but no fruit. Again he writes of the plant which has no depth
' Ihya, III, P. 22.
' Cf. my Rdbi'a the Mystic and her Fallow-saints in Islam, P. 34 and similar
stories of the Christian saints, e.g„ St. Anthony.
' IhYd, II', P. 237. IV, p. 67, II, p. 152.
of soil and so dies, while that which is deeply rooted survives.' He compares the imparting of
knowledge to the casting of seed into the ground, which will assuredly, grow and thrust its roots
downwards and extend its branches upwards. 2 He knows something of the nuisance of weeds in
the rainy season, and observes that to pull them up does not ensure that they will not recur as
long as the ground is exposed to rain.3 He compares the self-deluded to a man who wishes to
clear a field of weeds, who goes over it carefully, searching for the weeds and uprooting each
one he sees, but not searching for what has not yet raised its head above the earth, because he
supposes that everything has appeared and shown itself. But from the roots fine shoots may have
grown and extended under the soil (perhaps he knew something of bindweed), which he has
overlooked and neglected, and behold, they grow and become strong and injure the roots of his
crop, he knows not how. So also is he who thinks that the outward expression of religion is
sufficient and neglects the inward corruption.' al-Ghazali had also watched the leaves falling in
winter, as they dried up, leaving the tree in its essence, bare, but with a new beauty and delicacy
and grace in its bareness, and notes that so, too, sin can fall away from the soul, when it has no
longer any encouragement or support. 6
But al-Ghazali thinks of plants and flowers not only as things of beauty and a source of keen
delight to every lover of Nature, but also as displaying the wisdom and loving-kindness of God,
Who has given the fruit its rind so that it may be protected against the birds, Who has ordained
that the roots of the mighty tree shall be buried deep in the ground, in order to drink water
therefrom, so that the earth becomes like a nursing-mother to it. The veins of the leaves, he
notes, are like those of human beings, and serve the same purpose. It is by the wisdom of God
that the leaves appear before the fruit, to protect it while it is still immature and liable to injury
from the heat of the sun, or from unduly cold winds. Of His kindness to man, the
I Munawi, op. cit., fol. 196b. Ihya, IV, p. 69, the latter reference perhaps
a reminiscence of the Parable of the Sower. i Ihyd, it, p. 216.
s Subki, Tab., p. '39. 4 Ihyd, III, P. 337
6 1 hvd, II, p. 141.
Creator has fashioned the trees and the fruits and the flowers, of different colours and shapes and
flavours and scents, small and great, splendid and humble, of all colours and all shades in those
colours : the very sight of them, says al-Ghazali, purifies the heart of unclean thoughts, and
refreshes the mind as it contemplates them, and the soul rejoices in their radiant beauty. He notes
that the branch is made strong enough to support the pomegranate, so that it will not fall until it
is ripe, and how the melon and the gourd rest on the ground, because their stems cannot support
so heavy a weight, and how all these ripen just at the season when man most needs them. He
refers to the wonderful means by which the date-palm is fertilised and notes how God has
created aromatic roots with medicinal properties, able to relieve and cure the diseases of men. He
points out that, by the Divine power, all these, the tree and the blade of grass and the fragrant
herb and the flowers, with their varied hues and shapes, all alike have developed from one
substance, from which they have derived their nourishment, and that is water, one cause, yet
such infinite variety in results.'
Such a man, then, was al-Ghazali in his maturity, with his intellectual powers unabated, a keen
observer, possessed of the eager curiosity which was inspired by his passion for truth, a man
wise, tolerant and charitable, a lover of his fellow-men and of the humbler creation, both animate
and inanimate.
I al-Hikmat fr blakhlugkt dlldh, pp. 57 fi.
CHAPTER IV
al-Ghazali's family herlat2Hislyhome-lifer His friends and
His sisters a
disciples.
We have very little information Ahmadn who asewellal-Ghazali s family, except
known both as preacher and mystic. Ahmad seems to have been possessed of great gifts, b outh
he was con early tent to act as attracted a servant the religious life and y sha
In so to the Sufis, while learning ala ~owledge~of the mystic Pathltand and seclusion he cam
then went to 'Iraq and gave himself to the task of preaching in Baghdad, where great crowds
were attracted to hear his sermons. He used also to o d into recall them to God letAsanvd
preach to the Bedouin,
have seen, r he exercised the privilege of relationship in criticising his more famous brother and
he is said to have recited these lines in reference to him
" When you keep company with kings,
then clothe yourself
With the fear of God, the most valuable of garments,
And when.you enter, enter with closed eyes,
And depart, when the time comes, with closed lips.
Ahmad, as already related, was bridgment,ofrhis brother's deathbed,
r an bab
and was responsible ears, and died
alIhyd). He survived Abu llamid by fifteen y
at Qazwin in 520/1'120.2 his mother was still
al-Ghazali had also several thsisters
sons had become famous.
alive and in Baghdad
He was married before the age of twenty, but none of his bio
graphers give the name of his wife. There are indicatiions,
however, that his was a happy
• C1. P. 30 above. Gi- also Khwans ri,,oQ. dl., p.18o and Zwemer,
• Sublet, Tab., IV, PP- 54
a Moslem Seeker after God, p. 68. 55
dogmatic teaching, he follows the orthodox doctrine as .to the
subordinate place of women in society, elsewhere it is evident
that he fully appreciated the importance and value of their

influence in the home and also in a wider sphere. He considers
that marriage is a great advantage to a man, not only for the
sake of having children, but because of the satisfaction and
benefit and refreshment to be obtained, from the companionship
of a wife, which is a consolation to the heart and strengthens
it for the service of God. The soul, he says, sometimes grows
weary in well-doing, and the refreshment and joy which it
derives from the companionship of women dispels its heaviness
and cheers the heart, and so a good wife is of the greatest value to a man's religious life.
Moreover, it is the woman's character and religious faith which contribute most to a happy
marriage. " He who marries a wife for the sake of her wealth and her beauty," he says, " makes
her beauty and wealth unlawful to him, but upon him who marries a woman because of her faith,
God will bestow both wealth and religion."'
We have seen, too, that he considered that the mother's training of the child's character was as
important as that of the father and he held that only a godly woman should be allowed to suckle
and nurse a child. 2 He gives many stories in which women
play the chief part and are held up as an example to the other sex. He advises those who plead
that they are unable to follow in the steps of the illustrious leaders of the Faith, to consider the
God-fearing women and the degree to which they attained in the spiritual life, and to admonish
their own sluggish souls in saying, " 0 soul, be not content to be less than a woman for it is
contemptible that a man should come short of a woman in respect of her religion or her attitude
to this world. So," he says, "we will now mention somewhat of the spiritual states of those
women who have striven to serve God," and he devotes the rest of the chapter to setting forth the
outstanding example of the women saints of Islam.9
Among the stories he gives is that of a certain devotee who stopped before Haban b. Hilal, when
he was sitting with his
1 Ihya, 1, p. 28.
' M. Rids, op. cit- p. 5a. ' IkydWV, p 351
friends, and asked if she might put a question to one of them. They bade her ask any question she
would of Haban b. Hilal. She then asked them what was their idea of generosity ? They replied :
" The giving of gifts, and munificence, and the preference of others to oneself." She said : " This
is generosity in relation to this world, but what is generosity in respect of religion ? " They
replied : " That we should serve God Most Glorious, with willing hearts, ungrudgingly." She
asked : " Do you seek a reward for that ? " They admitted that they did and when she asked why,
they answered : " Because God Most High has promised us, for each good deed, a ten-fold
reward." 1 She said " God be praised, if you give one and take ten, how can you be called
generous ? " Nonplussed, they asked her for her idea of true generosity and she said then : " In
my view, generosity means to serve God, with joy and delight in His service, ungrudgingly, and
without seeking any reward, so that your Lord may do with you what He wills. Are you not
ashamed that God should look into your hearts and know that by one gift you are seeking another
? This is considered a shameful thing in worldly affairs."
Another woman saint once asked : " Do you reckon that generosity is concerned only with
dirhams and dinars ? " She was asked : " With what then ? " She replied. " To my mind,
generosity means the gift of oneself, body, soul and spirit." 2
al-Ghazali was evidently a devoted father, much concerned with the happiness and well-being of
his children. His kunya "Abu Hamid" seems to indicate that he had at least one son, though no
sons survived him and perhaps any son or sons died as children. He writes tenderly of the
relation of the infant to its mother : " He knows only her and will take refuge only with her and
trusts her alone, so that when he sees her, he clings to her skirts and will not leave her and if any
trouble overtakes him when she is not there, the first word his tongue utters is a cry of " Mother,"
and the first thought which comes into his mind is of his mother, for she is his refuge. He
depends upon her as his surety and sufficiency and as always full of pity for
Cf. the story of Rahi'a in my Rdbi'a the Mystic, pp. 32 ff. 9 Ihya, III, p. 226.
P
him;: and this reliance on her is based on a certain amount of comprehension, through what small
power of discrimination he possesses." Again he writes : "The infant boy knows that if he does
not cry for his mother, she will seek him out, and even if he does not cling to her skirts, she will
he does not ask her for milk, she will give him him drink even if
al-Ghazali knows, too, the value of distracting a child's atten
tion by a counter-attraction, for he notes that the child is weaned
from the breast, by being induced to play with toy-birds and such
like, to distract him from his desire. He also notes how sweet
music will hush the crying of the child in the cradle, and take
his attention from the cause of his Weeping.2 It was, no doubt,
from observation of his own children in their infancy that he
points out that the incapacity of the suckling to appreciate the sweetness of honey and fatted
birds and delicious sweetmeats does not indicate that these things are not enjoyable, nor does the
infant's appreciation of milk indicate that it is the most desirable of foods. I He speaks also of the
small boy who, when he has become attached to some plaything, will not be parted from it and if
it is taken from him, he weeps and protests until it is restored to him. -When he goes to bed, he
takes it with him and when he wakes up, he remembers it and' takes hold of it. Whenever he
loses it, he cries, and when he has found it again
he laughs. If anyone disputes his possession of it, he is angry,
but he loves that one who gives it back to him. 4
al-Ghazali had a deep sense of the obligation of a father to his
children : the business of training a .child he reckons to be one
of the most important that can be undertaken. " The boy,"
he writes, " is a trust in the hands of his parents, and his heart,
in its state of pristine purity, is a precious jewel, clear and free,
as yet, from any imprint or image, but susceptible of every
impression and inclination. If he grows up accustomed to
what is good and with a knowledge of it, then he will be happy
in this world and the next, and his reward will be shared by his
teacher and his preceptor. But if he becomes accustomed to
what is evil and is as neglectful (of what is due to God) as the
2 Ihy4, IV, p. 225. IAyd, II, p. 243
AL-GHAZALI'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY ~9
brutes, then he will be wretched and come to an evil end, and the responsibility for that sin will
be upon the one who controls and rules him." As the father protects his little child from fire in
this life, so also he must protect him from the fire of Hell, which is of much more consequence,
and this protection is assured by a good upbringing, positive training in virtue, and protection
from evil companionship.
The boy should not live too easy and comfortable a life, nor be allowed to grow fond of outward
adornment, lest he should waste his life when he grows up, in seeking for material possessions,
and so perish eternally. As soon as the child shows signs of discrimination, he must be watched
more carefully, so that his choice shall be directed towards what is good and the evil shown to be
such, and rejected, and so he will maintain purity of heart and attain to a sane and well-balanced
judgment.
The boy should lead an active life and take plenty of exercise, lest he grow sluggish, and after he
has finished his lessons he should be allowed to play games which he enjoys, but he should cease
to play in the presence of his elders. His father must preserve the dignity of speech in talking to
his son and should upbraid him but rarely and this only in private, not publicly. The mother
should rebuke him for what is shameful and say that she will tell his father if he does not amend
his ways. I
If al-Ghazali suffered the loss of children while still young, it must have been a consolation to
him to remember the tradition, which he quotes, to the effect that on the Day of Resurrection,
when all mankind are examined as to their deeds, those who have died as infants will gather
round the judgment Seat of God the All-Merciful and He, looking upon them, will say to His
angels, "Take them hence_ to Paradise." 2 It was no doubt with his own children in mind that al-
Ghazali says that if a child is no longer with us and we wish to maintain our love for him, absent
or present, living or dead, we speak at length of his courage and generosity and his learning and
the rest of his lovable qualities, and so our love and our memories are kept alive,'
al-Ghazali was survived by three daughters and, apparently,
M. Rids, op. cit., pp. 5o d. Ihya, IV, p. 69. Ihy6, III, p. 227.
a Ibya, IV, p. 257.
Itfiran al-'Ama!, p. 91.
IhYa, IV. p. 286,
6o AL-GHAZALI'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY
by his wife, since it is mentioned more than once that he died
in poverty, having reserved of his former wealth only what was

sufficient to maintain, them. It was presumably the urgent
requests of his little daughters to which he refers when he says
that " the prayers of his infant children " induced him to give
up a wandering life and to return to his native land. r It is
much to be desired that we had the letters which passed between
al-Ghazali and his wife and children, when he was absent from
them. The company of his' daughters must have been a great
satisfaction to sd devoted a father and as we have seen, his frequent references to women and
girls as exemplars in the religious life does not suggest that he would consider them as of less
real consequence than his sons. He quotes with approval the story of a little slave-girl who used
to take the Prophet by the hand, in Medina, and relates that he did not withdraw his hand from
hers, but used to let the child accompany him wherever she wished. 2 One of his daughters, .who
was named Sitt al-Nisa, had a son called 'Ubayd Allah, whose great-great-grandson, Majd al-Din
Muhammad was alive in Baghdad, in the year 710/1310,3 so that al-Ghazali probably had
grandchildren to delight his last years.
A man with al-Ghazali's personality and capacity for friendship naturally gathered many friends
and disciples around him and some of his associates were men of outstanding character and
importance. Among his fellow-students in Nishapflr was Abu'lMazaffar Ahmad al-Khawafi, 4
who also studied under the Imam
al-Haramayn and was one of his most distinguished and most
favoured pupils, who was permitted to discuss with him by day
and by night and earned the highest commendation from the
Imam. He was said to earn his living by his success in debate
as al-Ghazali was able to earn his by his success in writing.
al-Khawafi began to teach in the lifetime off the Imam and was
appointed as Qadi of Tvs, but he gave up his appointment in
order to devote himseT-to the life of a religious ascetic.
al-Khawafi died at Tds in 500/1106.6

One of al-Ghazali's earliest friends, whose life was exactly
Mungidh, p. 22.
_''y4, III, p. 306. , Cf. .'i, ab. e.,, p. 4,
° Subkr, Tab. TV, pp. 55,p308. bov.

AL-GHAZALI'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY 6r
contemporary with his own, was Abu H5-mid 'Ali al-Tabari alHarrasi, 'Imad al-Din, known as
al-Kiya (= one of high rank or great influence), born the same year as al-Ghazali, in 450/1058, in
Tabaristan, and also a Shafi'ite. He went to Nishapur and studied under the Imam al-Haramayn,
who made him an assistant tutor. We are told that he was a good-looking man, with a clear voice,
who expressed himself in a polished and agreeable style, and 'Abd al-Ghafir, one of his
contemporaries, declared him to be a second Abu Hamid (al-Ghazali), " Nay, more profound in
learning, more holy in life, more pleasing in voice and more agreeable in countenance," r but he
admits that al-Ghazali had the keener intelligence of the two and was quicker in exposition and
explanation. It was said that when al-Kiya had memorised a piece of work, he used to repeat it at
each step as be went up the stairs leading up to the Nizamiyya College at Nishapur and there
were seventy steps. From Nishapur he proceeded to Bayhaq, where he taught for a time and then
went to 'Iraq, where he was appointed chief professor at the Nizamiyya College, and held his
chair for the rest of his life. He was there, we know, in 495, and was high in favour with the
Seljuk sultan Maid al-Mulk Barkiyaruk, sod of Malik Shah, who appointed him chief Qadi. al-
Kiya was a traditionist, and in one of his sayings be declares : " When the horseman of the
Traditions gallops about in the hippodrome of contestation, the heads of analogical deductions
are struck off and given to the winds." He is also said to have been responsible for the following
lines, while engaged in a discussion with Abu'l-Wafa' b. 'Uqayl al-IHanbali
" Have pity on thy servant, for he has the dryness
Of Media, while thou hast 'Iraq and its waters."
al-Kiya died in 504/1110 and the poet Abu Ishaq Ihrahim', al-Ghazzi composed this elegy upon
him after his death : "Islam weeps the absence of its sun and sheds floods of tears, compared
with which the rain would not be copious. Behold that learned divine, who used to receive us
with an open and smiling countenance : with that look of pleasure which, to a visitor, was the
best of welcomes. Death may tread him under foot, but his vast
1 Cf. p. iG above. Ibn Khallikan, op. Cit., II, p. 229.
62 AL-GHA,ZALI'5 LIFE
AND PERSONALITY
learning has spread abroad to distant climes.
lessons gave new life to Ibri Idris al_ l ` There instructive position, intelligence and reflection
stand a and, their who
was so fortunate as to note them down He unfading brightness. The obscurities ' possesses"
now a torch of -
scurities of jurisprudcnce, elucidated
by thy words, are like the foreheads of brown horses marked with a white star. Did I
him and exclaim ; ' know throe equal, I should invoke
from th The age is impoverished and requires succour
Y riches."' Among his works were the U -
(Principles of Religion) and Aljkdm al-Qur'dn $alDof the Q~an), s (The Ordinances
Another contemporary and intimate friend of al-Ghazali, of the greatest importance, because he
has left us so much information concerning al-Ghazali was Abu'I-Hasan
Isma iI al, born at Abd al-Ghafir b.
infant r lFarisi,Nishapur, in 45111059. He was an
P gy, able to read the Qur an at the age of five, and to
recite the articles of the faith in Persian
on his mother's side, of Abu'1-Q He was a grandson
the author of one of the earliest treatises alu m shayri,
alQushayriyya), with whom he studied the traditions, andahe learnt also from his grandmother
Fatima hint Abi 'All al-Dahhaq (al-Daggaq), He studied for four
al-Harama Years under the imam
yn, as a fellow-student of al-Ghazali and al-Kiya. On leaving Nishapur, he went to Khwarazm
(the district along the banks of the Oxus, extending to the Caspian Sea), where he
studied and lectured. Thence he travelled, by way of Afghanistan, to India. On his return from
his travels, he was appointed as
ere
preacwasherwhilineNishapur hand taught in the mosque of Akil.
that al-Ghazi returned to take
It
up teaching work and 'Abd. al-Ghafrr was once
m
association with his one-time fellow-student and was greatly
close
astonished at the complete change in his character. 3 He died in Nishapur in 529/1134• He was
the author of a number of
works, including Kitab al-Arba'in, Majma' al-Ghard'ib and an outline history of Nishapur•+
' Ob, '2041820 . Cf. Ibn Khallikdn, op. cit.. II, pp. 569.
' Subkr, Tab. IV, pp, z8r 8. Ibn Khallikan, Biog. Dial., II, two books are extant at Cairo.
' Cf. p. 32 above P 229. These
Ibn Khallikin, op. cit„ 11, p
A faithful friend of al-Ghazali, who had also been his fellowstudent under the Imam al-
Haramayn and had gone with him to 'Iraq was Abu Mahir Ibrahim al-Shaybani (called also al-
Shabbak) al-Jurjani.. After al-Ghazali had resigned his Chair and had become a wandering
ascetic, al-jurjani accompanied him to the Hijaz and Syria. He then returned to his own country
of jurjan and took up the work of teaching and preaching, and his teaching proved so acceptable
to his hearers that a College was built for him. He was _killed in a 'raid, and so attained to
martyrdom, in 513 /1119.1
Another faithful friend and fellow-student was Isma'il Abu'l-Qasim al-Hakimi al-Tusi, who went
with al-Ghazali to 'Iraq. He was older than al-Ghazali, who, we are told, treated him with great
honour and gave him precedence. The two went together to the Hijaz and Syria. al-Hakimi died
in 529/1135 and was buried beside al-Ghazali8
s "` -
al-Ghazali numbered among his students some who later became famous in various spheres of
life. Among the best-known of these was Abu 'Abdallah M. Ibn Tumart, known as al-Mahdi,
born 485 /io92 at Sus in Morocco. While still very young, he became renowned for his piety, and
as a youth, desiring to make the pilgrimage to Mecca, he travelled to Cordova and, thence to the
Hijaz. It was presumably at this time that he met al-Ghazali in Damascus, while he was living
there as an ascetic, in retirement, and shared his retreat in the mosque of the Umayyads. a
Visiting 'Iraq for the purpose of acquiring learning, he there met al-Ghazali, al-Kiya al-Harrasi
and al-Turtashi, and in Baghdad attended the lectures of al-Ghazali at the Ni;amiyya, probably
attracted to his teaching by his previous meeting with him.' It was while Ibn Tumart was in
Baghdad that news reached al-Ghazali that the Sultan 'Ali b. Yusuf b. Tashfin (ob. 537 /1143),
described as a mild, grave and virtuous prince, but a Malikite, and very submissive to the
theologians, had ordered his books to be destroyed, because he was told that they contained pure
philosophy, which he abhorred as heretical.
1 Subki, Tab., IV, p. 200.
s Ibid., pp. 204. ff. Cf. p. 37 above.
• Cf. p. 26 above.
• Cf. P. 29 above.
170. Subki. Tab. IV, p. 255.
iV.
64 AL-GHAZALI'S LIFE--AND-PERSONALITY
When al-Ghazali heard this, he foretold that the Amir's power wouwould be taken from him and
his son killed and his son's successor
ld be one who was even then, present in his
audience. The young Ibn Tumart, as he listened, prayed that this might cone to pass by his
means. He returned to Alexandria and thence to North Africa, having acquired on his travels a
knowledge of the Ash'arite-doctrine, mingled with something of the Mu'tazilite teaching and the
Shi'ite theory of an infallible Imam descended from Àlt. The disturbances caused by his
heretical teaching caused him to be expelled from Tripoli, but he secured a large following
among the Berbers and proclaimed
himself Mahdi and overthrew 'All and the Almoravide dynasty,
which was replaced by the Almohades (a name taken from the
title of al-Muwahhid, which Ibn Tilmart claimed for himself).
Ibn Tumart himself was killed in 1130, but his teaching disseminated in N. Africa and Spain by
his successors. He
wrote a number of works, including one on Tawhidand the Kanz
al-'Ulum dealing with religious philosophy.,
Another of al-Ghazali's students, who later occupied a pro
minent position, was Abii l3akr Muhammad Ibn al-'Arabi, born
at Seville in 46711076, who was travelling in the East with his father in 1092, He visited
Damascus and Baghdad, where he may have met al-Ghazali and must, in any case, have heard of
his teaching, and proceeded to the Hijaz, but returned to Baghdad, in order to attend al-Ghazali's
lectures. Ibn al-'Arabi afterwards returned, by way of Cairo and Alexandria, to Seville, where he
acted as Qadi for a time and later was teaching, until his death there, in 546/1151. To him we
owe certain replies given to him by al-Ghazali in response to his questions, which may have been
sent in writing from Spain, or may have been given to him
in person and set down by him in writing. s
One of the most famous of al-Ghazali's students was Abu Sa'id b. Yahya al-Nishapuri, known as
Muhyi al-Din, born in 476/1083-4, who studied larvunder Abu Hamid and his .fellow
' Ihn Rhallikan, op. cii., III, p. soy. Subkr, Tab., IV, PR 71 ff. 'Abd al-4VShid al-Marakushr,
History of the al-Mohades, ed. R. Dozy, D. 13- Macdonald notes that Ibn Tamart laboured, very
different Manner, to bring about in the West the same revival of faith and religious 8life
though in a very v
toswhich al-Ghazsn gave himself in the East. J.A.O.S., 1899- p. i'3.
Cf. -N'S. Paris, 5291.
A -GHAZALI'S LIFE AND ,PERSONALITY 65
student Abu'l-Nazaffar al-Khawafi and became an eminent jurisconsult, being appointed as chief
of the jurisconsults at Nishapur. So great was his reputation that persons came from all directions
to study under him. He lectured at the Ni7,amiyya College at Nishapur and later, at the Niz,
amiyya College at Herat. It is related that at one of his lectures someone `was moved to recite
these lines : " The mouldering remains of religion and of Islam receive new life from our master
Muhvi al-Din, son of Yahya.' When lie teaches, he seems To have received a revelation from
God, the Lord -of the Throne." al-Nishapuui said that his master al-Ghazali and his knowledge
could be known only by one who had himself reached or almost reached, intellectual perfection.
al-Nishapuri wrote al-Aluhil in explanation of al-Ghazali's Wasit. He was killed in battle, when
the Ghury attacked the Seljuks, in 548/11153. a
Another of al-Ghazali's students, who became- a dis iiiguished and popular teacher, was Abu'l-
Fath al-U*iili, born in 466 /1083-4, who was at first a Hanbalite, but later studied under al-
Ghazali and al-Kiya. He lectured at the NiZamiyya for,a time and then in his own house and
pupils thronged to him' in-siich numbers that he was occupied all day long and continued
teaching after nightfall. A group of students besought him to lecture to them on al-Ghazali's Ihyd
: he refused at first on the ground of lack of time, but he finally gave way and agreed to lecture
on it at midnight. He died in 518 /1124.9
Among al-Ghazali's students were Ibn 'Uqayl and Abu'lKhattab, who attended his classes during
the period when he first held his chair in Baghdad, and made notes of his lectures and quoted his
sayings in their own works.'
Another faithful recorder of al-Ghazali s words was the Shaykh Sa'd b. Farts, known as al-
Luban, who was present at al-Ghazali's sermons after his return to Baghdad (cf. P. 29 above),
when the people thronged his assemblies to hear him preach. The Shaykh made a record of the
sessions for exhortation and found that they amounted to one hundred and eighty three. The
Shaykh read
Malryi al-Din = the Reviver of Religion : Yahya = he lives.
• Ibn Nhallikiin, op. cii., II, p. 628. Subki, Tab., IV, p. 197.
• Subkl, lab., IV, pp, 42 #.
• hh Rida, op. tit., p. g.
AGHAZALI'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY hiis, iiote!i. of these- addresses to al-Ghazali, who,
after he had --to rrected -them, gave the Shaykh leave to make use of them,
and the Shays pied them out into two stout volumes. I
Otherstuden d disciples of al-Ghazali are mentioned by
his biographers, 2 but little is known of the subsequent career of most of these.
'
BrockelmannIbfd., p• 16 , P• Perhaps 44• the Hitab a1-Ma,,-,jr or fhe Na a'ih al-Ghazdlr,
Cf. , I, P 2x and Suppf., P. 752. . Murtad
- t, Ifhn
CHAPTER V
al-Glfazdli's Literary Style. His wide resources. His
extensive use of Imagery.
al-Ghazali's literary style is clear, attractive, readable and, in some ways, curiously modern. His
knowledge of Persian is perhaps the reason why he uses Arabic with a freedom. and lack of
formality which is unusual among Arabic writers. Everywhere he shows himself to be a master
of his subject and possessed of the power of penetrating men's minds and souls. I Much of his
written work represents the substance-of his lectures-and . bears the marks of a teacher's
endeavour to impress his meaning upon his audience, but an audience which-consisted chiefly of
scholars and divines whose education had been much the same as his own and whose learning
was not- greatly inferior. But there are short works of his written in a style simple enough for the
common folk and with the type of illustration which could be expected to appeal to them.
To his profound learning and his wide experience of men and life al-Ghazali added a religious
passion for truth which is revealed on every page of his greater works and gives them their claim
to immortality. The intellectual curiosity which had combined with his search for truth to make
him study philosophy and natural science, as well as theology, jurisprudence and the traditions,
enabled him to draw upon a great and varied store of knowledge, for both his method of
exposition and his illustrations. His arguments are closely reasoned, especially in the most com-
prehensive and characteristic of his writings, the Ihyd Whim al-Din, 2 which was the outcome of
long reflection, culminating in the period of solitude and meditation which followed his
conversion. In this great work we have his mystical teaching
' His style, in its ease and lucidity, has been compared with that of St. John Chrysostom (the
Golden-tongued) Cf. Carra de Vaux, Les penseurs de I'Islani, IV, p, too.
3 In Islam, this work may be said to take the place of the Sunnua Theoloefca of St. Thomas
Aquinas in Christendom. Cf. #. Guillaume, Prophecy and pivinalion, p. 326.
68 AL-GHAZALT'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY

set forth in an ordered sequence of thought, original, profound
and mature, which is based upon reasoning as sound as it is
subtle. But his lesser works show the same literary character
istics and are equally lucid and well-reasoned, containing a wealth
of imagery and appeals to analogy. Not onlyy the fact that he
had great resources of knowledge at his command, but the
additional fact that he was a lover of both plants and animals
and aa close observer of-Nature in all her manifestations, is re
vealed in al-Ghazali's choice of images and illustrations. Every
kind of creature seems to have attracted his attention, whether
bird or beast, and anything which could fly or creep or swim.
Earth and water, too, flowers and trees, the heavens and the
winds, and, not least, men and women, all have come under his
observant eye, and all that he observed, as well as his own personal
experience, was drawn upon to make its contribution, directly,
or by way of illustration, to his teaching.
He notes that the gnat, in spite of its minute size, acts with
deliberation and intelligence : that, though so small, it has been
created with a body as perfect as that of the elephant and is
possessed of all the faculties and functions which other animals
enjoy. He goes on to speak of how it is guided to man and the
human pore, to seek its'nourishment and how its eyes, though
perfect, are too small to possess eyelashes, the purpose of which
is to preserve the eyes from dust, and it is therefore provided
with antennae to serve the same end. Then he observes how,
through the weakness of its sight, it falls into the lighted lamp,
because it is seeking the daylight and supposes the lamp to be a
window in a dark room, and if it flies beyond it, yet it returns again to it, until it is consumed.
The gnat serves as an illustration of the wonders of God's handiwork, but also of man's blindness
and ignorance, when he is attracted by the lights of desire and does not realise that they make for
his destruction, not only here, but in the fire which is not quenched."
al-Ghazali also bids his readers consider the bee and its capacity for building a house of wax, and
its choice, from all forms, of that which is hexagonal, not round or square or pentagonal, the
square being rejected because the space in the cor4ers would
' I!4Ta, IV, p. 273.
be wasted, while the cells would not fit into the round shape only the hexagonal is perfectly fitted
to its needs. Then, too, from the flowers and fruit blossom the bees obtain nectar, from which
they extract the wax for their houses and the honey for their nourishment, and from these men
can secure liEht and medicine. al-Ghazali goes on to note how the bees preserve the nectar from
all defilement and will slay any intruder who might enter the hive and defile it, and how they
obey their queen, who administers justice impartially towards them. He bids his readers draw the
moral from this simple illustration, for as human architects fall short of the bee's unerring instinct
for building, and of its perfect accomplishment of its purpose, so also man's knowledge falls
short of the Divine knowledge, for what he knows is not worthy to be called knowledge in
comparison with the Omniscience of God.'
Of the limitations of science and the need for a knowledge which is beyond that attained by the
senses, al-Ghazali writes : " The mere physicist is like an ant which, as it crawls over a sheet of
paper, observes black letters spreading over it, and refers the cause to the pen alone. The
astronomer is like an ant of rather wider vision, which catches sight of the fingers moving the
pen, that is, he knows that the elements are under the influence of the stars, but he is unaware
that the stars are under the control of the angels. So also those whose eyes do not look beyond
the phenomenal world are like those who mistake servants of the lowest rank for the king
himself." s
Reason is compared by al-GhazalL.with a horseman going out to hunt, whose horse represents
human lust and his dog passion. When the horseman is a skilled rider and his horse well broken
in, and his dog thoroughly trained and obedient, he deserves to be successful : but if he lacks
wisdom and his horse is restive and his dog savage, and his horse will not obey his urging, nor
the dog his signals, he does not deserve to obtain what he seeks .3 al-Ghazali gives another
illustration taken from hunting, to show how desire and passion can be turned to good purposes
and how those in whom they are strong, but well under control,
e {
r TheAlchemy of Happiness, p. 35. 9 3llzin al-'Aural., p.-47.
reach a higher degree than those in whom they are repressed
altogether. Some people say that the hunter who hunts without
either horse or dog is more of an expert, and to be esteemed more
highly than the hunter using the dog and horse, because he is
safe from the danger of his horse bolting with him, and he cannot
be attacked and bitten by his dog, but this view al-Ghazali
considers mistaken, for he who hunts with horse and dog, if he
is strong and has them well-trained and under control, is a hunter
of a higher class than the other and will get more enjoyment
out of his hunting. 1
al-Ghazali compares this world to a snake, smooth to the
touch and attractive in appearance, but possessed of deadly poison, and he advises men to
beware of what they admire in it, because its allurements cloak the power to do men deadly
harm. 2 Again he compares self-centred action and absorption in the desires of the self with the
action of the silk-worm " which spins continually and comes to a grievous end in the midst of
what it spins." So, also, man can destroy himself by a life centred in himself, and if he will take
warning from the self-destruction of the silk-worm, he will utterly reject the life of self-
indulgence, and save his soul alive. 8
al-Ghazali frequently uses images derived from his knowledge and love of plants and his
experience of a garden and its needs. He compares the man who imagines that human knowledge
will suffice him apart from Divine revelation, to one whose father built him a castle on a
mountain-top and placed within it a certain growing herb, with aromatic properties, and
impressed upon his son that the castle must never lack this herb for a single hour. The son
planted all kinds of sweet herbs around the castle and sought far and wide for cuttings of aloes-
wood and saffron and musk and many sweet-smelling trees, so that the scent of the original herb
was quite overpowered and he said within himself: "Doubtless my father bade me preserve this
herb simply for its fragrance and now with all these scents, we have no need of it and it serves no
purpose now except to take up space," so he threw it away. When he had done so
I Ih''d, IV, p, 37. 1 ILyd, IV, p. 208. s AP!, III, p. 187.
from a certain hole there appeared a poisonous snake, which bit him and brought him to the point
of death. Then he realised, when it was too late, that.the herb had been expressly intended to
keep away this deadly snake and that his father, in bidding him preserve the herb had two
purposes in view, firstly, that his son should benefit by- its fragrance, a purpose which the son
had realised by means of his reason, and secondly, that the deadly snake should be kept away by
its scent, and this purpose the son, by his unaided reason, had failed to realise, because he
supposed there was nothing beyond what he knew. So al-Ghazali draws the moral that human
knowledge and reason are not enough for men, they need the guidance of the prophets, to whom
is revealed the mystery of God. 1
He uses the nut to illustrate the different classes of believers. The first, he says, is like the outer
husk of the nut, the second like the inner rind, the third like the kernel, and the fourth like the oil
which is extracted from the kernel. just as the outer shell of the nut is not fit to eat, but is bitter to
the taste, and when used as fuel, extinguishes the fire and makes it smoke, and if left about in the
house, clutters up the place, and it is therefore thrown away, so also the confession of faith with
the tongue only, apart from the heart's conviction, is profitless, harmful, blameworthy, both
outwardly and inwardly, though useful for a time, to preserve the inner rind until death comes.
For the inner rind represents the heart and the body, and the confession of the faith, even by the
hypocrite, preserves his body from hostile swords, for they are not bidden to pierce men's hearts,
the sword reaches only the flesh, which is the outward husk, and when this is stripped from him
in death, there remains no advantage afterwards in his confession of faith (which was only with
the lips). The inner rind serves to preserve the kernel and to keep it from corruption, while it is
stored, and when it has been removed, it may be used as fuel, but is of little value in comparison
with the kernel, so also the heart's conviction, accepted on the authority of others, is of greater
profit than mere confession by the lips, but is of much less value than the belief produced by
personal experience of the grace of God. Though
I Subki, Tab., IV, p. 137.
01.
I
the kernel is precious in itself, as compared with the inner rind,
and as a whole is desirable, it is not free from a certain admixture
of impurity, in comparison with the oil which is extracted from
it, and so also the believer, who through his own experience
sees God to be the Only Agent, has attained a high rank, yet he .
may not be free from some acceptance of " otherness " as com
pared with the mystic who does not regard God in relation to His
works at all, but sees Him alone and nought else.'
Of the stations attained by the traveller on the mystic Patti,
al-Ghazali says that they consist of knowledge, feeling and action (in accordance with
knowledge and feeling), 2 and the knowledge is like a tree, the feeling like the branches and
action like the fruit, and this is universally true in regard to the stations of those who are seeking
God. 2 Referring to the capacity for attaining to perfection, which God has implanted inhih
man, wc may akesbe
brought from potentiality to actuality, if man chooses the
conditions which make for its development, al-Ghazali t
for illustration the date-stone which, he observes, is neither an
apple-tree nor a date-palm, but has been created such that it
may become a date-palm, if it is properly cultivated-it could
never become an apple-tree, even with cultivation-but the
date-stone is affected by the choice which gives it the conditions
necessary for growth, or fails to do so. So, too, we can choose
to develop our character and our religious life, by self-discipline
and effort, which lead us to salvation and the life with God,
Who gave us the capacity to ascend, if we but choose to do so.+ In stating his conviction that it is
essential for the novice on the road to God to have a spiritual director as guide and tutor to help
him and train him in getting rid of the vices which hinder his progress, and in acquiring those
virtues, by the help of which he can go forward, al-Ghazali compares such a director with the
ploughman who harrows the soil, in order to remove the thorns and weeds from the crop, so that
its growth may be
stimulated and it shall thrive more perfectly. s
al-Ghazali also compares the different capacities of men for the attainment of knowledge, with
the different means of
= Cfyp• IV, below. Cf. p. z67 below. 3 Ihya, IV, P. 55. 5 Ayyuha'l-walad, p. 38 Ihy6, I11, p. q8.
obtaining a water-supply. If wells have to be dug there must be effort involved, but as there is
water which flows without any work on the part of men, and some which is hidden beneath the
earth, which requires perseverance in digging in order to discover it, and some which needs toil,
but very little of it, so it is also with the attainment of knowledge within the human soul. Some
comes forth from potentiality to actuality without human study, and this is the case with the
prophets, for their knowledge is received from heavenly sources apart from human means, and
for some, prolonged effort is needed, which is the case with most men, and for others,
comparatively little.'
Again al-Ghazali compares the heart to a reservoir, into which flow waters which are offensive,
turbid, impure, from the rivers of the senses, and the purpose of self-discipline is to free the
reservoir from such waters and from the mud which defiles it, and also to prevent the water
which is clean and pure from being affected by defilement. How, asks al-Ghazali, can such water
be drained away from the reservoir, while the rivers are free to flow into it, for at every moment
the supply is renewed to a greater extent than it is removed ? Therefore the senses must be
controlled and limited to what serves a necessary purpose, as waters which flow into a reservoir
must be controlled and purified, and self-control, he adds, is made perfect only in solitude and
freedom from distraction, in which state the seeker hears the call of God and contemplates the
glory of the Divine Majesty. 2
al-Ghazali illustrates the difference between spiritual and material values by a reference to the
merchant in precious stones. To the ignorant it seems that to give one hundred dinlars for a gem
which weighs but a mithgal (one and oneseventh of a dram), is to give ten times the like of it,
since the money weighs ten times as much as the gem, but the jeweller knows better. The worth
of a jewel is not perceived simply by looking at it, but by the knowledge of the expert. The boy
and the villager and the Bedouin deny its value, saying: " This jewel is nothing but a stone, it
weighs but a mithgdl and the
All-an al-Àinal, p. tog. Cf. al•Risalat at-Laduniyya, pp. 46 ff. 1 hva, III. p. 66.
74 AL-GHAZALI'S LIFE AND i

weight of a camel is a thousand thousand rni qa s." To
it seems that the camel must therefore exceed the jewel in value to that extent, but it is they who
are wron
values cannot be measured in terms of material o, tooalents.t, al Comparing the eternal happiness
of the next life
passing pleasures of this world, al-Ghazali says ; " with the
we were given a world full of pearls, and eve Indeed, if
a bird were to snatch away g every hundred years
pearls would vanish, but no part of eternal f happiness ' will shell ever
pear e diminish or pass away." 2 He observes elsewhere
in which the pearl is enclosed ought not to distract you from the
l itself, nor the outward form of the spirit i.e, which it inhabits) from the spirit, nor the outer
huskowhich
surrounds it, from the kernel, so that you are led away by the
things which are seen and temporal from the things which are
not seen and are eternal. You should therefore be concerned
with one thing only, and busy your heart with God alone : the
Adversary will then have no power against you and you will become one of God's chosen
servants." 3
al-Ghazali often has recourse to the common things of life to provide him with illustrations. To
make clear the difference between Self-subsistent Being
does not subsist of itself), and Not-Being (i.e., that which
does u in the ghe says that when the dust of the earth itself e the in the of i y the wind and
proudly twists about suppose that the dust itself is v~hirl ~yoandl°0k~ng upon it would
tt is the wind which is moving it, but while he cannot see the wind,
g but it is not so,
he can see the dust. The dust is not a Being, Not-Being but the wind is. The dust in its movement
is simply
helpless, under the power of the wind, and all power rests with
the wind, though that power is not evident.
So likewise is
the creature under the power of the Creator : it seems to act
by its own volition, but in reality all is due to the Will of the
Creator, though that Will is invisible. 4 to beware of despising the little things whIn warniyi~, h
readers
ich combines to make
up both what is good and what is evil,. al-Ghazali urges them
' Ihya, IV, p. 25
' :lliz¢n al-'rlntat, p. 3, IV, p. 66•
1dm+, Nafahrit al-Uns, P• 426.
AL-GHAZALI'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY ;
not to be like the woman who was too lazy to spin and excused herself by saying that she could
manage to spin but one thread in an hour and asked : " What good is attained by a single thread
and what contribution will that make to a garment ? " not realising that the clothes worn in this
life combine thread with thread, as the material substances of the world combine particle with
particle, and so make up the whole. So also the little deeds of goodness are by no means lost in
the sight of God. i
That it is impossible to serve God and Mammon al-Ghazali seeks to prove by the example of the
vessel, from which, as the water enters, the air passes out : it cannot contain them both. So too,
the heart cannot contain both the love of this world and the love of God, and he who lives in
fellowship with God is preoccupied with Him and can be concerned with nothing else. He uses
much the same image to prove that, as Nature abhors a vacuum and you cannot therefore empty
the vessel of air without replacing it with water or something else, otherwise it will be filled with
air, as a matter of course, so too, the heart which is occupied in serious reflection on religion is
free from the suggestions of Satan. On the other hand, to be heedless, even for an instant, of the
claims of God Most High, means that in that very instant, Satan enters in. 3 He also observes that
nothing can leak from a vessel except what is in it, and so also the heart gives forth only of that
which has taken possession of it, whether good or evil. 4
al-Ghazali notes that the darkness of sin cannot exist along with the light of good deeds, just as
the darkness of the night cannot co-exist with the light of day, any more than the defilement
caused by dirt can co-exist with the cleanliness produced by soap. "Just as the use of clothes for
manual work soils them, and washing them in soap and hot water cleanses them, so also the
concern of the heart with sensual lusts defiles it, and ,vashing it with tears and burning it with
contrition cleanses and purifies it. The heart which 'is thus purified is acceptable unto God and it
is for you to cleanse and purify it. The heart of man
Iltva, I\', P. 43. a flit-it, IV, p. 65.

Ihh'd., p. 2O) ' 1), I'd, II, P. 237• ' Iktid, IV, p. ii.

al-Ghazali compares to a glass vessel, and evil qualities are
like smoke and darkness : if these affect the heart, the way to
happiness is darkened, but good qualities are like light and
flame, and when these take possession of the heart, it is purified
from the darkness of sin : the heart is either enlightened or
darkened, and none can hope for salvation save him who ap
proaches God with a pure heart.'
In reference to the seeker who is sure of the way to God and
follows it of his own accord, al-Ghazali says that if God gives
illumination on the way to such a seeker, he does not become
more certain of it, but he sees it more clearly, just as one who
sees a man at dawn, when the sun has risen, is not more certain
that it is a man, but sees more clearly the details of his form .2
The Reason he compares to a lamp and the Canon Law to the
oil which supplies it : so long as there is no oil, the lamp is useless and if there is no lamp, the oil
cannot serve its purpose. There is a reference to this in the verse : " God is the Light of the
Ifeavens and the earth," for the Canon Law is Reason from without and the Reason is a Canon
Law from within. s
al-Ghazali draws a striking picture of the degree to which men vary in respect of gnosis and
faith, upon which theit eternal happiness depends, for only by means of the light of knowledge
do men pass hereafter into the Presence of God, which is the true meaning of Paradise. Some
give forth light like a mountain and some much less, and in the lowest rank is the man who has
only light enough for the toe of his foot, a light which shiries at one time so that he can go
forward and at another is extinguished and he stands still. The passage of the faithful over Sirdt-
the bridge, sharper than the edge of a sword and finer than a hair, which is suspended over the
flames of Hell, over which they must pass to Paradise,-depends upon the light they possess.
Some pass like the twinkling of an eye, some like a flash of lightning and others like quicksilver
or a shooting star, Some pass like a race-horse at full speed, but he who has light enough only for
his great-toe crawls along, face downwards, on his hands and feet, dragging one hand and
' )Cfriya al-Sa'ada, p. 13.
_ lhya, IV, p. 218,
' illa'arij al-Q, ds, p, Go. Sura XXIV, 35.
holding on by the other, with the flames touching his sides, and so makes his way until he is
safely across. As the light of the sun, if measured against the light of all the candles in existence,
would surpass them, so also the light of some men is like the sun's light, far surpassing the
candle-light possessed by the common folk. The faith of the righteous is a light like that of the
moon and the stars, but the faith of the Prophets is like the sunlight. Just as the surface of the
world, from one -_--horizon to the other, is revealed in the light of the sun, while l
t ie light of a candle reveals but the kno
corner of the wledge which expands the
'
there is a distinction between
breast (of the ordinary believer) and the revelation of the full , extent of the Kingdom to the heart
'of the gnostic. . . . Oil the Day of Resurrection those Whose rhearts contain less, weight I of a
grain of faith, or half a grain, q brought forth from the flames of Purgatory, but those whose faith
exceeds the weight of a grain will not enter the flames at all.'
In reference to other worldliness, al-Ghazali quotes the words of
Yahya b. Mu'adh' who said : " The ascetic for the sake of God,
makes you sniff vinegar and mustard, but the gnostic makes
you inhale musk and ambergris." The same mystic is quoted
as saying : " This world is like a bride.and the worldling who
seeks her is her tire-woman-the ascetic blackens her face and
pulls out her hair and tears her garments, but the gnostic is so pre
occupied with God that he does not even turn towards her"
e
Another simile of which al-Ghazali makes use in reference to
this world is one derived f turn the Prophet, who said : ` It is
as if a rider, journeying on a hot day and seeing a tree, were
to take an hour's rest beneath its shade : then he goes on his
way, leaving it behind." He who regards the world in this
light, says al-Ghazali, does not rely upon it or mind whether
his days therein are spent in distress and hardship or in dace
and luxury. He does not build brick upon brick (i.e.,
not make a permanent abode for himself there). He repeats
also a tradition do t not makes your abode there," and adds pass
over it, but = b x258/8 1, a mystic of Nishapiu. 2 Ihpa, IV, P. 28.
;3 AL-GHAZALI'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY

this is a clear simile, for thee life of this world is -a passage to the
next and the cradle is the first milestone and the tomb the last,
and between the two is a journey, the length of which is limited;
men include those who have crossed half the bridge and some
who have crossed a third and some two-thirds, and some for
whom there remains but a step more. In any case, it must
be crossed, and to build upon the bridge and adorn it, in the
course of crossing it, is the height of folly al-Ghazali uses another
simile taken from words ascribed to Jesus : " He who seeks
this world is like one who drinks salt water, the more he drinks
the more his thirst increases until it kills him." He gives
another illustration of the worldling's folly, taken from the
Prophet, who said : " The worldling is like one who walks on water, and how can anyone walk
on water and his feet not give way ? " r
Again al-Ghazali compares this world to a halting-stage or market-place through which pilgrims
pass on their way to the next. While in this world, it is a man's business to secure provisions for
the way, that is to, say, by the use of his bodily faculties, to secure some knowledge of the works
of God, and, through them, of God Himself, in the vision of. Whom he will find his bliss in the
world to come. s
Dealing with the " lust of the eyes " al-Ghazali quotes from a saving of Fudayl 3 that Satan says :
" It is mine ancient bow and mine arrow which goes not astray," al-Ghazali is reminded that the -
Prophet had also said : " The glance of the eye is one of Satan's poisoned arrows, which he
shoots with unerring aim and no shield can ward it off save the shutting of the eyes and fleeing
from the direction of its course, for this arrow is shot only from the bow of outward forms and if
you turn aside from the (temptation) of those forms, Satan's arrow cannot reach you.
'4
Writing of the one who possesses knowledge and acts in accordance with his knowledge, al-
Ghazali says that he shall be called great in the Kingdom of Heaven, and compares him
1h
Y4, III, pp. 187, 188.
• 1hya, 111, p. 182.
• Ihn 'lyid (ob. 187,6o2) one of the best-4nocn of the early Sufis. ' 11sYir, III, p. 37, IV, p.
66.
AL-GHAZALI'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY 79 with the sun which is both radiant in itself and
gives of its radiance to others, and like themusk hiehwhot knows ands doe
diffuses its fragrance abroad. not act accordingly i sessing the knowledge, and` the whetstone.
others, while itself pos
which sharpens others and has no cutting-edge elitself naked w and
and the needle which clothes others,
the wick of the lamp which gives light but is itself burnt away,
as someone said
It is only a wick which was lighted,
It gave light to men and was itself consumed." 2 "Though
In this connection al-Ghazali writes in one of his books: would of you were to measure out
othousand did notadrinkithereof. Therefore
Therefore
become intoxicated, if y
know that it does not profit ~k o s to o~g4asr youudo not ac knowledge
and nd to accumulate many accordance with what they teach." 3
He compares the heart heard man to a sheet and believed s since paper is childhood. is imprinted
all that he has
Some may have come to fmh~ maturity Qhea beliefs
and nd these are receptive
not so deeply impressed that is so deep that they are like paper the but in some the impression
imprint on which cannot be lags destroyed hand, thinking by g of the heart' paper and burning it.
O
susceptibility to temptation turns roundions its nest every hour, pares it to the bird
to the pot when it is boiling hard, and its h of the continually blows
disturbed and to a feather on waste land, it over and over. a
Some of his illustrations instance, disastrous effectcof recall his by land and by prominent
position he
wrong-doing on the part of those in a p
writes : " The sin of a learned man is like the wreck of a ship
1 Cf. p. 3o below•
• Il'y I, p 44 Cf. &Iizan af-'Ama1,6p. 129.
• Khulasat ul-tasanif p'1-Tafaw'W~+f' p'
k1izan at-'Am al, p. 163.
• Ihva, 111, p. 40
8o AL-GHAZALI'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY

which sinks together with those on board her." 1 Another simile
derived from his experience as a traveller is used in reference
to the virtue of patience, which, he considers, is to faith what
the head is to the body : " There is no body without a head,
nor does anyone possess faith without patience. The two
half-loads (borne on each side of the camel) and the small package
(which is placed on top) are bestowed upon the patient, the two
side-loads being Prayer and Compassion, and the small package
Guidance." I
In urging his readers to tolerance of those whose beliefs may
differ from their own, and pointing out that truth is truth,
irrespective of the person who holds it, and that even those who
are in error as a whole may be in possession of some measure
of truth which can be detached from their errors, he reminds
them that gold is obtained from dirt, and that no harm comes
to the assayer when he thrusts his hand without hesitation into
the forger's bag and draws forth the genuine gold and silver
from amongst what is debased and bad, trusting to his expert
knowledge. it is only the ignorant peasant, he continues, not
the expert assayer, who should be prevented from having any
dealings with the coiner. So, too, it is the inexperienced swimmer
who is kept back from the seashore, not the swimmer who has
the skill to surmount the waves, just as a child is prevented from touching a snake, but not so the
highly skilled charmer. So al-Ghazali defends the seeker for truth, who is experienced in the
search, for his study of what contains the false as well as the true. a
It was perhaps his experience of the illness which preceded his resignation which led al-Ghazali
so often to use illustrations drawn from the science of medicine. Pointing out that in the matter of
knowledge generally, men accept the conclusions 'of experts, without insisting on testing the
matter in question by first-hand experience, lie says : " Suppose we imagine a man, mature and
capable of reasoning, who has never before experienced illness, and then falls ill, whose father is
a doctor, compassionate and skilled in medicine, whose medical skill has always
i 1hYa, I1', p. 30.
' Ihva, IC, p. 34.
.lluegidh, p. ,3,
been known to his son. If his father makes up a prescription and says to him : " This will help
you in your sickness and will heal you of your affliction," what will his reason suggest to such a
man? Even though the medicine is bitter and abominable in taste, will he accept it, or will he
reject it, saying " I understand that this medicine can ensure a cure, but I have not myself tested it
by experience ? " Would you not reckon him a fool if he did so ? So also teaching which comes
down on the authority of the Prophet and his successors is to be accepted even though its validity
may not have been tested by the experience of those who receive it, and those who reject it for
this reason are but fools who deprive themselves of guidance and help."'
Again, in discussing the comparative values of different types of knowledge and the estimation
iniwhich they should be held, he points out that the results to be obtained from any branch of
knowledge are the really important thing. Therefore a knowledge of religion is of infinitely
greater value than a knowledge of medicine, for the fruit of the latter is temporal life and the fruit
of the former is life everlasting. 2
1 mungidh, p. 33
2 Fn1i¢dt a(-' Ulum, p. 59.
CHAPTER VI
al-Ghazali as Poet and Musician. His love of Beauty.
Although al-Ghazali's fame as a writer and teacher rests on
his prose works, yet he was also a poet, responsible for a volume
of poems, 1 and there are verses of his to be found in his prose
writings, and quoted by his biographers. Moreover, his writing
everywhere, and his choice of words and images, is that of the
poet, whose ears and eyes are open to the world of experience
which lies behind the world of the senses, but is approached
by means of them. " He who is without hearing and sight," he writes, "cannot enjoy sweet
singing and beautiful forms and colours," and just as it is not given to all to have the sensitive
eye and ear, so also many lack the inner power which would enable them to respond to the
beauties' of sight and sound, that feeling for beauty and that love for the beauty of the natural
world, which is the " joy in widest commonalty spread." 2 To al-Ghazali, all beauty, whether
manifested to the eye or to the ear-for he was a great lover of music-made an irresistible appeal.
He writes of the beauty of green things, of running water, of a fair face, and of beautiful colours
and sounds, and perhaps there have been few of the mystics with whom it was not so : nearly all
of the Sufis were poets, and their mysticism expressed itself most often in poetry. There are
Divine yearnings within the soul which can be expressed only by means of it and of music, but
those who have no poetry within them, who are not responsive to the rhythm and music and
imagery of poetry, cannot interpret its significance. " Consider," writes al-Ghazali, " the poetic
sense by which certain people are distinguished. It is a kind of apprehension, which is so lacking
in others that they cannot discriminate between the scansion of a regular metre and that which is
irregular. Consider how,
' dlu'amalal Asrar al-D1x. Cf. pp. 36ff6 above and the Qasida contained in MS. Paris 3198
fol. 87b.
2 Ihya, IN', p. 23.
82
AL-GHAZALT'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY 83
in others, this capacity is so developed that thereby they o produce music and melodies, able to
provoke sorrow and joy,
slumber and weeping and madness, inciting to combat, or the cause of swooning. But these
effects are produced strongly only in one who is himself possessed of this gift, while one who is
devoid of it, though he also hears the sound, is very little affected by it, and he wonders at the
one who is seized with ecstasy or swoons away. So that, if all those who are themselves poets or
musicians were to try to make him understand not do so." '
what it means to 0 possess that faculty, writes elsewhere : " He al-Ghazali, who possessed. who
has a heart (i.e., is spiritually minded) and knows its true
nature, knows that it is moved by poetry and music as it is not moved by other things. Therefore
he seeks to move it in this way, either by his own voice or that of another." al-Ghazali defines
poetry as that which has measure and significance
in poetry, he says again, is wisdom to be found."
One of his love-poems, which has been handed down and

belongs perhaps to early days, his " The curls3 about her temples, to the moon of her cheeks,
have
fall'n,
In loveliness so radiant, that none with her can compare,

In the sign of the Scorpion, we have often seen the moon,
To see the Scorpion in the moon, that is a thing more rare."'

But these lines might well have a mystical significance, for the
hyacinthine locks of the Beloved, in the poetry of the Sufi,
represented the One veiled by the Many, and her moon-like
cheek ses attributed toe him by al-Jawharitexpressed his opinion of the religious leaders of his
day Cf. the words of a modern
Ilryk, II, p. 200. llishkat of- in¢u6r, p. L33. i mystic (George Russell), " The purified psyche rs a
focus or burning point ests
ure light
through which that which sbecoming sevenfold ;boundless ntellectualpfires are
through p, thoLight, Power, for ever playing upon us and we apprehend them as ~nsdom, love,
music is one oay in which teansaersraspiation and we eceive,tinterpret or misinterpret the oracle
as our being hose is pure or clouded•" A.~ , 0ng
and its Fountains, pp. 23. 24.

s Ihya, II, p.265, pp 240, 241.
r 'Agarib, which means both scorpions " and" curl IV, p r5 Ibn Khallikdn, op. eit., II. P. 623. Cf,
Subki,

" Like lamp-wicks are the men we know, Whose light burns brightly, but below Is something
other than appears : As brass another aspect wears, Its worthless nature hid from sight, When
overlaid with silver bright."'
There are verses attributed to him in the days when he was
travelling and living a life of solitude, after his conversion, which are expressive of what his
conversion had meant to him :
" Once I had been a slave : Lust was my master, Lust then became my servant : I was free.
Leaving the haunts of men, I sought Thy Presence, Lonely, I found in Thee my company.
Not in the market-place is found the treasure Nor by the ignorant, who know not Thee,
Who taunt me, thinking that my search is folly, But at the end, Thou wilt be found with rim'" 2
Among his verses on love to God were the following lines

Though love afflict me, yet it is not grievous,
For death to self, means life in Thee my Lover, To suffer thirst, if that shall be Thy pleasure, To
me, is sweeter far, than all refreshment. Nothing can grieve me now, save what divides me
From Thee-but with Thee, nought has power to harm me."'
There are verses left to us which refer to al-,t hazali's experi

ence in teaching at Nishapnr, when he had been persuaded to leave his life of retirement and had
to face such calumny and hostility
What though the darkness of their enmity,

E'en like a threatening cloud, envelop me, Doth not the pearl in darkness chew its light, Against
a sombre background shine more bright ? Whether they praise my teaching, or they err,
Despising it as false : though they prefer Dust to a gem--it matters not to me, Pearls still are
pearls, unvalued though they be."
Of one whose life was devoted utterly to the service of God
Subki, Tab., IV, p. 115. ' Subki, Tab., TV, p. ri5.

Murtada, Ithaf, p. 24, ' Subki, Tab., IV, p. 105.
and perhaps he was thinking of his own flight from the world, he wrote
" He cast away his books that he might travel without burden, His provisions, yea, even his
sandals, did he cast away." 1
al-Ghazali also frequently quotes the verses of other poets, though almost invariably without any
reference to their source, 2
Closely linked with his poetic genius was al-Ghazali's love for music, which was responsible for
some of his most inspired writing. " The deaf man," he writes, " misses the joy of sweet sounds
and musical notes : he is like one who is absent, though present, and dead, though he be alive." 3
It was a much vexed question among the orthodox in Islam, as to whether listening to music and
singing was permissible or unlawful. 4 al-Ghazali ranged himself with those who reckoned it to
be lawful, for man, he points out, is not forbidden to delight in that which gives him pleasure, if
it is not associated with anything which leads to sin. With his usual sanity and breadth of
outlook, he states his view that it is not possible that listening to music should be unlawful
simply because it is pleasant and measured, for no one regards the voice of the nightingale or of
other birds as unlawful, and there is no difference between one throat and another, or between
the inanimate and the animate. So we ought to draw an analogy from the voice of the nightingale
to the sounds which proceed from other bodies, especially the sound which issues from the throat
of man, or from musical instruments.
He quotes the tradition of David (obviously founded on the legend of Orpheus), that when he
bemoaned himself, reciting the Psalms, so sweet was the sound that men, jinns, wild beasts and
birds used to gather round to listen to his voice. He points out further that even the camel, though
stupid by nature, is affected by the cameleer's song to such an extent that its heavy burdens seem
light to it, and listening to music gives it an energy that makes long journeys seem short, and
produces an
lb:d„ p. toe.
7a For further examples of his own verses cf. dli'ydr al-'Ilm, p. 14. Subkl, iIV, pp. 102 if.
Murtac.l5, I!haf, 1, pp. 24 ff. Khwansari, Raaedat alJauea, p. 184. Ibn Khallikan, op. cit., 11, p.
623. al-ffikniat fi Makhlzigat Allah, p. 27. Cf. trujwiri, Kasf.f al-.1lahlcib. PP, 399, 413

excitement which intoxicates it. So when' the desert-roads
seem long to them and they are overcome by the fatigue of
travelling and the weariness of the heavy loads upon their pack
saddles, then the cameleer summons them with his song and
they stretch out their necks, listening to the singer, with their
ears pricked, and hasten their pace, until their loads and saddles
are shaken upon them, and perhaps they may perish, because
of the violence of their pace and the weight of their loads, of
which they are unconscious, because of their excitement.
al-Ghazali also tells a story of Abu Bakr. M. Da'ud al-Dinawari,
known as al-Raggi, r who, when he was travelling in the desert,
met with an Arab caravan and was given hospitality by one of the men, who brought him into his
tent. There Abu Bakr saw a black slave in fetters and a number of dead camels in front of the
tent, and one camel so weak and emaciated that it seemed about to die. The slave appealed to
Abu Bakr, saying "As a guest you have a right to ask favours, therefore intercede for me with my
master, for he will be gracious to his guest and will not reject your intercession, and it may be
that he will release me from these bonds." So when food was brought in, Abu Bakr refused to eat
and said : " I will not eat until I have interceded for this slave," to which his host rejoined : " This
slave has reduced me to poverty and destroyed my possessions," and when Abu Bakr inquired
how this had come about, his host said : " He has a beautiful voice, and I made my living from
hiring out these camels (lit, from their backs). and he loaded them with heavy loads and then
sang to them so that they accomplished a three days' journey in a single night, because of the
beauty of his song, and when they were unloaded, they all died except this one camel. But you
are my guest and for your sake I give you what you ask." Then Abu Bakr wished to hear the
slave's voice, and when morning came, he bade him sing to a camel which was drawing water
from a well near by, and when the slave lifted up his voice, that camel was maddened and
snapped its ropes, and Abu Bakr fell upon his face, and thought lie had never heard such a
wonderful voice.
If therefore, music has such an effect, even upon the brute
'. Or al-flugg1. Cf. ]ami, Nafa~¢i a/-Uun', No. 229.
creation, anyone who remains unmoved by it, must be regarded as being in some way deficient,
lacking a sense of proportion, unspiritual, ruder and coarser in nature than the camels and the
birds, indeed than all the beasts, for all of them are moved by measured melodies. Music and
singing do not produce in the heart something which is not there, but they stir up what is already
within it.
Music also refreshes the heart and serves to distract it from temptation and from anxiety, for
when hearts are overdriven (and no doubt music had been a relief to al-Ghazali himself at the
time of his spiritual wrestling), some recreation helps to strengthen them and to fit them once
more for concern with worldly affairs and for religious duties, such as prayer and reading the
Quràn. A period of leisure and recreation may be regarded as the remedy for weariness and
restlessness, both of mind and body, and therefore music is permissible and even desirable, for
this purpose, but there ought not to be much recreation, as there ought not to be too much
medicine, to cure bodily affliction. Moreover, listening to music, simply for the sake of
enjoyment and relaxation, though permissible, is the lowest level of listening, shared by every
kind of living being.'
A degree above this is listening to music with understanding, but with application to some
material thing. A third and higher stage of hearing includes the application of what is heard to the
relation of the soul with God, and this kind of listening is that of the seekers (ruridun), especially
those who are novices, for they desire the direct knowledge of God Himself and the entrance into
His Presence and the enjoyment of secret contemplation, and the removal of the veil between the
soul and God. So when the nnurid hears the singer singing of arrival or approach or ardent desire
for one expected, or longing for one who is absent, or of loneliness or fellowship, or the mention
of the sight of the beloved one, undoubtedly one or other of these will be in harmony with the
spiritual state of the fnurid in his search. The heart of man is like a flintstone and music evokes
the fire hidden within it, so that its flames blaze up and its longing is strongly aroused and
overpowers him who hears,
' 144, II, pp. 239, 243, PP- 250 ff. 257.
and spiritual experience of divers kinds is made possible for
him thereby.
But the highest type of listening to music, in al-Ghazali's
view, is the listening of the soul for what God Himself may
reveal to it through music.' " The purpose of music, considered
in relation to God," he writes, " is to arouse longing for Him
and passionate love towards Him and to produce states in
which He reveals Himself and shews His favour, which are beyond description and are known
only by experience, and by the Sufis these states are called ' ecstasy.' The heart's attainment of
these states through hearing music is due to the mystic relationship which God has ordained
between the rhythm of music and the spirit of man, and the human spirit is so affected by that
rhythm that music is the cause to it of longing and joy and sorrow and 'expansion' and
'contraction.' 2 But he who is dull of hearing and unresponsive and hard of heart is debarred from
this joy, and such a one is astonished at the delight of the mystic and his ecstasy-for enjoyment is
a kind of apprehension, and apprehension requires something to be apprehended and-the capacity
to apprehend, and he who lacks such a perfected capacity cannot imagine such enjoyment. How
can anyone who lacks the sense of taste enjoy food, or he who has no ear, the pleasure of sweet
sounds, or one who is out of his mind enjoy intelligible things? So also, after the sound has
reached the ear, the true significance of music is apprehended by the inner sense within the heart,
and he who lacks that sense, of necessity takes no pleasure in it," 3
The fourth and highest degree of listening to music, therefore, is that of the gnostic who has
passed beyond states and stages, who is conscious only of God and has become unconscious of
self and his own actions and his relations with others. In that state of absorption, he plunges into
the ocean of contemplation,
I Cf. a modern writer, R. Heber-Newton, who regards music as the living God within us, " if we
obliterate or extinguish music, we extinguish the last light God has left burning within us, to
point the way to find Him anew." The Mysticism of Mu.cic, p. 4.
' CL sera 11, 246 and Hujwirf, "Qabd denotes the contraction of the heart in the state of being
veiled (hijab) and bast denotes the expansion of the heart in the state of revelation (kashf) "
Kashf at-Alahjub, p. 374
-' I¢ya, 11, pp. 246, 247.
and such a state as this the Sufis describe as passing away from the self {fans'). Dhu'l-Nun al-
Mi~ri said of the ecstasy produced by music that it was a Divine messenger, urging the heart to
seek God, and he who listens to it, seeking its spiritual meaning, will find God, and he who
listens to it only with the outward ear, sinks into unbelief. I
So, too, Abu'l-Husayn al-Darraj 2 said : " Ecstasy (wajd) is an expression for what is experienced
in listening to music, and music carries me away to the place where Beauty dwells and enables
me to contemplate God (wujiid Allah) within the veil, for He has poured out for me the cup of
beatitude and I have attained thereby to the station of Satisfaction, and have entered the spacious
gardens of eternal joy." 3
Listening to music, al-Ghazali says again, results in the purification of the heart, and purification
is the cause of revelation, for by the power of music the heart is roused to activity and is
strengthened for the contemplation of what was previously beyond its power, just as, by the
cameleer's song, the camel is strengthened to bear a load which it could not endure before, for it
is the heart's business to seek for revelation and the contemplation of the mysteries of the
kingdom of God. 4
In conclusion, al-Ghazali states that anyone who listens to music should have regard for time and
place and company, and should avoid any distraction and anything which would disturb the
heart. The listener should give his attention to what he hears, being present in heart, absorbed in
what he is doing, guarding his heart and meditating upon what God may reveal to him, of His
mercy, within his inmost self. Listening to music, then, is altogether desirable for one who is
dominated
I Ihyd 11, P-257. For a further study of gnosis and fans, cf. Chapter XII below.
2 Cf. lami, Nafahaf al-Uns, No. 207.
3 Ikyd, fl. p. 257. Cf. Hujwfri, " IVajd is a mystery between the seeker and the Sought, which
only a revelation can expound. 1Vujlid is a grace bestowed by the Beloved on the lover, "and
again," wujrid is the thrill of emotion in the contemplation of God . . . some declare that ward is
thaglowing passion of lovers, while wuj&d is a gift bestowed on lovers," Iinshf al-Mahjrib,
PP• 413, 313.
Ihyn, II, p. 258. Cf. E. Underhill, " Of all the arts music alone shares with great mystical
literature the power of waking in us a response to the lifemovement of the universe, brings us-we
know not how-news of its exultant passions and its incomparable peace." Mysticism, p. 76.
go AL-GHAZALI'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY
by the love of God, in whom music. arouses only praiseworthy
qualities, for on those who by nature are emotional, the effect
of music is greater, fanning into flame the love which has already
taken possession of the heart, whether that love be earthly and
sensual, or Divine and spiritual.'
But music, to al-Ghazali, has also a cosmic significance
earthly music is but an echo of the heavenly music. In his
Qasida al-Ta'%yya al-Ghazali explains that the soul responds
to music here, in this life, because it is reminded of melodies
heard long since, before it was invested with its body, when it
listened to the sweet melody of the spheres. So, by some earthly
melody, it is reminded of the time of its pre-existence,. when it
dwelt in the heavenly places, and it longs to be once again re-united with its Source. When the
babe in the cradle is soothed by sweet singing and shows its delight, and lies at peace, it is
remembering the celestial music which rejoiced it in the heavenly realms, when the spheres,
revolving on their orbits, sang together and offered their praises to the All-High .2 So, also, al-
Ghazali writes that the perfected gnostic, within his heart, hears the music of the spheres and has
the joy of listening to the angelic choirs, and then he understands the meaning of the songs of the
birds, for they, too, uplift their voices in praise of their Maker. 3 In listening to music, therefore,
the mystic is sharing in the supernal harmony, and the human spirit is entering into communion
with the Infinite and Eternal Spirit. Music, for al-Ghazali, was
a door to Eternity.
' 'Td, 11, pp. 265. 269. The Alchemy of Happiness, p. 64.
z UP- cit., pp. 228 ff. Cf. Shakespeare,
There's not the smallest orb which thou beholdest, But in his motion like an angel sings, Still
quiring to the youngeye'd cherubins Such harmony is in immortal souls."
The Merchant of Venice. Scene I, dct V. 3 al-dln'arif al-'Agiiyya, fol. 8b.
CHAPTER VII
al-Ghazali as mystic. Asceticism and Solitude. The
life of Prayer.
In his autobiography, al-Ghazali states that when he had considered the Sufi way of life, he
realised that it could be followed only by means of "knowledge and action." Having acquired the
theory by his study of the writings of the Sufis, he knew that he must carry it into practice if he
was to attain to their spiritual experience and, through mysticism, find his way to God. The first
step on the way was the cleansing of the soul from the qualities which hindered its search for
God, it order that it might be set free for His service. " The entrance to the Path," he says, " is the
absolute purification of the heart from all save God, the beginning of which (just as the Tahrim--
the acknowledgment of God's Holiness-is the beginning of Prayer) is the complete absorption of
the heart in the recollection of God, and the end of it is to pass away altogether into God, the end
of the Path, that is, but the beginning of the Unitive Life, and all that precedes it is but the
vestibule by which the mystic enters therein." r
The purification of the Sufi, be states elsewhere, means that " he offers the pleasures of the self
as a ransom for the sake of his soul. There was no difference, he held, between a man's worship
of himself and his worship of an idol. Whenever man worships any other than God Himself, he is
veiled thereby from God, 3 al-Ghazali therefore, applied himself to the asceticism which would
purify his heart from vice, and enable it to acquire virtue as a fixed habit of life, against which no
temptations could prevail, but he did not find it an easy thing, and he felt that it would have been
harder still, had he not felt the call of
' Mungidh, pp. 22, 23.
• Ayvuha'6Walad, p. 4a.
• IhYd, III, p. 53
91
God while still in the prime of life. "What is acquired in
youth," he says, "is like engraving on stone, but it is hard to
teach old age."' Three things, he felt, were necessary for the
healing of his soul, sick as it was with self-love and love of this
world : firstly, flight from temptation, for so long as he remained
on the scene of his worldly triumphs, desire would get the better
of him, and God had made the world wide enough to offer a
place of refuge from temptation, as He Himself said : " Is not
God's earth broad enough for you to find refuge therein ? " 2
Secondly, he must constrain himself to change his whole manner
of life, and, for wealth and ease, he must substitute poverty and
hardship, exchanging the garb of pomp for the vesture of humility,
and, in fact, in every aspect of life, in his downsitting and his
uprising, he must do the exact opposite of what he did, while
still in the world and of it. The remedy must be the antidote
for the disease. But, thirdly, he must be mindful in doing this,
to go gently and gradually and not rush from one extreme to
the other, for human nature is perverse and its attributes cannot be changed in a moment, so
renunciation should be first of one thing and then of another, until little by little his evil qualities
would be eradicated and the service of God would not seem hateful to him. I Asceticism, for al-
Ghazali, began with control of the natural appetites, for self-indulgence he regarded as one of the
gates to Hell, and satiety as its foundation, while selfcondemnation and contrition were a gate
into Paradise, the foundation of which was fasting. The locking of a gate into Hell meant the
opening of a gate into Paradise, to be near to one meant being far from the other. He held, too,
that moderation in eating kept the body healthy and excess led to sickness, in addition to being a
hindrance to devotion. Self-indulgence and the love of this world were the cause of man's
destruction in the next and therefore he set himself against both and cut himself loose from
worldly attachments, in order that he might be detached to God. a Four things, he considered,
would guard against " bandits " on the road to God, those temptations which might snatch the
traveller back to the world he had abandoned, and
these four were solitude and silence, fasting and vigils. Fasting made the heart pure and receptive
of the Divine revelation, from which it is veiled while hardened by self-indulgence. Vigils have
the same effect, and by such means the heart becomes like a bright and shining star, or a polished
mirror, wherein is manifested the Divine Beauty, and so it may contemplate within itself the
mysteries of the world to come. 1 Too much sleep al-Ghazali considered to be destructive to the
heart, the ascetic should indulge only in the strictly limited amount necessary for health, during
which he might hope to have revealed to him the secrets of the Unseen. 2 Love of this world al-
Ghazali felt to be largely identical with love of money, for " dirhams and dinars " were the means
by which all the goods of this world were obtained. Wealth he compared with a snake, producing
both venom and the antidote for it, being calamitous in respect of its venom and profitable in
regard to the remedy for it. Anyone who recognises both the danger and the advantages of wealth
can guard against its perils and extract what is good from it. But renunciation of the world meant
renunciation of wealth for all personal use, hence al-Ghazali s abandonment of his own
possessions, except what was needed for the support of his family, after his conversion.3
f Asceticism, he felt, was of three degrees, the aim of the lowest
degree being salvation from the fires of Hell and its sufferings,
and of the second degree, the desire for the Divine reward and
the favour of God and the fulfilment of His promises. But the
highest degree is that in which the ascetic desires nothing but
God and communion with Him, and his heart is not concerned
with escape from the pains of Hell nor with attainment of the
bliss of Paradise, but his concern is only with God Most High,
and this is the asceticism of the lovers of God, the gnostics, for
only that one who knows Him really loves Him. This highest
degree of renunciation, to the ascetic, does. not seem to be re ~- nunciation, for he does not feel
that he has abandoned anything,
since he knows that the world is of no account, he is like one who
has cast away a potsherd and replaced it by a jewel and that
1 I4ya III, p. 65.
2 11uni%V1. Op. cit., fol. r96b. above.
2 Ihya, III, pp. ?02, 204. Cf. p. z-
' ' ' n al-'Aural, p. 38. Siura, IV, gg.
Ihya, IV, P. 69.
1 Mundw3, op. cit., fol. rgya.
c)4 AL-GHAZALI'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY
seems to him no renunciation. So the ascetic does not rejoice in ,`-hat he possesses nor grieve
over what he lacks : praise and blame are alike to him, for his fellowship is with God Most High
and what predominates in his heart is the joy of obedience.'
To al-Ghazali this world seemed to be only a place of sowing for the world to come and the
harvest was the consummation for ever of that fellowship with God which has its beginning here
on earth. Death to him, was not the end of existence, but merely the final separation from this
world and a closer approach to God, the Beloved. While in this world he was hindered from
continuous fellowship and continuous recollection of Him and the contemplation of His Beauty.
The tomb, therefore, seemed to him but the entrance-gate into the gardens of Paradise, whereby
he would be set free from the prison of the body and worldly fetters, and could at last be alone
with his Beloved. Therefore, while still travelling on the way to that invisible world, he
continued to observe a rule of life which would keep him apart from this world and would enable
him to give his time to recollection and meditation upon the life to
come. 2
al-Ghazali say that he had heard one of the Sufi Shaykhs declare that the traveller to God looks
upon the next world whil<' he is still in this, and Paradise is really found within his own heart,
when the self has been purified from its defilements and the concern is concentrated upon God.
But recollection i p;sible only to the heart at leisure from itself and for this
uliiudc is necessary. Only in solitude can the mystic hear i L, call of the Creative Truth
and contemplate the Divine Glory. ,l-Ghazidi himself had sought that experience and lie states
that all solitaries know that this is true. 4 He writes of his own experience, when lie strove to
overcome desire and sought seclusion and tried to give himself to meditation and recollection
and found himself continually distracted by Satanic suggestions " There is no remedy for this
except bycutting off all ties, both outward and inward, by flight from wife and child and wealth
N1 161a. op. cit., p. 65.
ILna, ill, p. rg!.
nnawi, op. cit., foL r97a. ,ilizun al-'Arlrrl, p. ii.
P. 33.
and position and companions and friends. Then must come the withdrawal to a cell and a
minimum of food, and contentment with that. But all this will not suffice unless the concerns of
the heart become one concern, which is God Himself. Even
when that prevails over the eupon t, it the Kingdom of heaven meditation by the inmost self earth
and the wonders which God has made and the rest of the
gates which lead to a direct experience of God and then, and then
/only, will the solitary be free from Satanic temptations." Then
every moment `must be occupied with reading and recollection
and prayer, with a heart at leisure orecollection. attention This
concentrated
n the approach to God through beginning, says a1-Ghazali, when you utter the name of God with
your tongue and your heart is present with Him. Then ersevere the tongue no longer moves,
bremain ssoul in the heart.
heart So far the
and the meaning of that word w
mystic has chosen to concentrate his thoughts, but after this the of hat
choice ceases and there remains Only the Cectatiinwhowhad may be revealed by God. " This,,,
say
trodden that way, " is the highroad of the Sufis," 1 and he notes in connection with Recollection
that the Prophet had said that hearts get rusty as iron does and the means of polishing them is
t-"' the recollection of God.'
al Ghazali relates that a certain monk was asked how he could endure his loneliness and the
monk replied : " I am not alone, I have God as my Companion : when I wish Him to talk with
me. I1 read His book, and when I wish to talk with Him, I pray." al-Ghazali himself had the
quality of mind which could endure and was content to be alone for the sake of gathering the
fruits of seclusion. But the chief value which he found in solitude was the opportunity it offered
for Prayer.' Much of his time was given to the prayer-life : we know that he spent whole days
and nights in devotion and he has left us many of his prayers, both of intercession and adoration
and he has told us much of what
• 1NHaaf al-'A-al, p. 35. anwuf, p 31. Cf. Chapter X1 below.
• Khuld$at al-fasdnff, f'l-Tai
• 14ya, II, p. 202,
• Cf. Ibn Jubayr who says that most of al-Ghazali s prayers were answere ,
and adds ; .1 We commend all sinners to his intercession, far God benefits us by the prayer of the
pure-headed among His saints." Rlhla, p. 119.
r
Prayer meant to him and of what he felt as to its nature and purpose.
He quotes a saying of Sufyan al-Thawri that God has a wind which blows at daybreak and'bears
the praises and supplications of men to the King Supreme. 1 He forestalls the objection that there
is no end to be reached by prayer if all is pre-determined by the Almighty Will of God, in saying
that it is pre-determined that evil shall be averted by prayer and supplication for mercy. Just as
the shield serves to turn aside the arrow and water causes the plants to spring out of the earth,
and the shield contends with the arrow, so also Prayer and evil wrestle together, and belief in the
pre-determining power of God does not debar anyone from using armour or from watering the
earth, after sowing the seed. 2 God invites His worshippers to pray, in order that prayer may
lead them to recollection and humility and self-surrender, which
enlighten the heart and make it receptive of His revelation and
mean a continuance of His loving kindness. This does not mean
dissatisfaction, on the part of those who pray, with God's Will
for them, but just as lifting up the water-jar and drinking its
contents does not mean dissatisfaction with the thirst which
God has decreed, for He has also decreed that water shall quench
thirst,-so also it is right to pray, for prayer is the means appointed
by God for the satisfaction of men's spiritual needs. e
It is characteristic of al-Ghazali to believe that even the humbler
creation joins with men in offering prayer and praise to God
and he observes that it is said that the birds and the insects
meet one another on Friday 4 and say : " Peace, peace, this is
a sacred day." s Of prayers for rain he states that when the streams cease to flow and the rains
fail and the conduits are dried up, it is an act of merit for the Imam to bid the people first to fast
for three days and to give alms according to their ability, and to refrain from doing injustice, and
to repent of their sins. Then, on the fourth day, he should go forth with them, accompanied by
old women and boys, all having purified themselves
' I(hulaFat al-lacinff f'l-Ta,awuutf, p. 10. ' Ihya, I, p. 298.
' Ihya, IV, p. 303.
' Friday th6o.ay for public worship in Muslim countries.
and being clad in coarse raiment, submissive, humble, in contrast
to their mien on feast-days, and it is said to be a very fitting thing
to take with them the cattle, because they also share in the need,
and may fittingly share in their petitions. I
aI-Ghazali held that a man should pray for his friends not only
during their life-time but also after their death, and he gives a
prayer to be said at the burial of the dead, commending the soul
of the faithful departed unto its Lord : " 0 Lord, Thy creature
has returned unto Thee, therefore have pity upon him and show
mercy towards him. 0 Lord, we beseech Thee, open the gates
of heaven unto his spirit and welcome him as he approaches
Thee. 0 Lord, if he did good (while here upon earth), then multiply his good deeds and if be did
evil, then close Thine eyes to his sins." s He also quotes the Prophet's words : "By the prayers of
the living, the tombs of the dead are lighted up," and the words of one who said : " Prayer for the
dead takes the place of guidance for the living and because of it, an angel enters into the presence
of the dead bearing radiant lights and says : " This is guidance for you from such a friend or
relative," and the dead rejoice in that as the living rejoice in guidance here." 3
He felt that God Himself called His servants to Prayer and made them desire thus to enter into
the. closest relationship with Himself. ° " Praise be to God," he says in an outburst of thanks-
giving, Who overwhelms His servants with His gifts and fills their hearts with the radiance of
faith and devotion.... He differs from earthly kings in that He inspires His servants to ask of Him
and make their plea unto Him, for He says : ' Is there any who calls unto Me ? I will answer him.
Is there any who seeks for forgiveness ? I will grant it unto him.' Unlike the rulers (of this world)
He opens the door and lifts the veil and gives leave to His servants to enter into familiar
intercourse with Him through Prayer. Nor does He limit Himself to giving
1 Ibid., p. 183.
1 Ibid., p. 184.
e Ihya, II, p. 164. Cf. the Christian prayer for the dead : " Let Light
perpetual shine on them, may they rest in peace."
1 Cf. the anchoress Julian of Norwich : I am the ground of thy beseeching:
first it is My Will that thou have it : and after I make thee to will it: and after I make thee to
beseecRevel o o sh f n sine Love, p. 84 (14th Revelation).
them leave but He shows His loving-kindness in inspiring them with the desire for this and
calling them unto Him." 1
The first thought on awaking and the first word upon the tongue, for al-Ghazali, was the
remembrance of God and praise to Him and he gives a morning prayer which we may assume
was his own greeting to his Lord on awaking : "Praise be to God, Who bath brought us back to
life from death (i.e. from sleep).
. 0 Lord, I ask Thee that Thou wilt lead me unto all good and that Thou wilt protect me from
evil.... Through Thee, 0 Lord do we arise in the morning and through Thee do we come to
eventide. Through Thee we live and through Thee we die and unto Thee do we return." a
The remembrance of God and the sense of His constant presence, he felt, should be with His
servant at all times. " Know," he says, and he is undoubtedly relating his own experience, " that
your Companion, Who never forsakes you, whether you are at home or abroad, asleep or awake,
in life or in death, is your Lord and Master, your Protector and your Creator, and whenever you
remember Him, He is there beside you. For God Most High bath said : ' I am the Companion of
Him Who remembers Me. Whenever your heart is stricken with grief for your shortcomings in
religion, He is there at hand, continually beside you. For He bath said : ' I am with those who are
contrite in heart,. for My sake.' If you but knew Him in truth, you would take Him as your Friend
and forsake all others but Him. If you are not able to do that at all times, do not fail to set apart
time both night and day, in which you may commune with your Lord and enjoy His presence in
inward converse with Him and may know what it means to have continual fellowship with God."
a
al-Ghazali bids all who draw near to God to forget this world and its people and to approach Him
as He will be approached on the day of resurrection, when the soul will stand in His Presence,
with no mediator between. In Prayer he says, " God is face to face with you and you are in
intimate conversation
, 1 Fn'a, 1, pp. 129, 130.
Iiidayi al-Hidayat, p. 5. s tlidavat al-Hidayat, p. 39.
AL GHAZALI'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY you are standwith Him and you must know in
Whose presence "
ing, for He is the King Supreme.' The five
al-Ghazali expresses his se
the Pro
nse of the of the ritual prayer beside
in quoting the words of
times of Prayer are like a river 0 fresh eaplunges five beside
btimes
the door of each one of you suppose that leaves of his defileeach day, and what do you
ment ? " s
Prayer with the.lips only ,vas real communion' alwith zGod
view, since he held that confidential cunco mu i His Presence.
could not exist along with any presence
The essence of prayer, he held, was humility, intention, sized
" If Prayer be an inner
of the heart and single-minded devotion, and he always em
the need for the heart to be " present-the rpresence of the heart,
reality, he says, six things are needful, and shame. By the
understanding, adoration, awe,
presence " of the heart al-Ghzltmeant ai t which
F ch the worshipper
enever the
be concerned with nothing except is engaged and what is uttered everything thelse ahe lips. nd
the hear is mindful thought is detached from fro then there is presence of the of that with which it
is concerned, eant something beyond this,
heart. By " understanding
the heart's comprehension of the spiritual meaning of what i is
uttered. Adoration goes beyond both t these and , A5o is an which cannot be given to man but
only to God.
expression for the reverence whi ~h results is from fittig on adoration tthe hrt
its source is the Divine ~lal~~-tY oodness towards him of the servant who believes in Cod's g
enter into prayer, for
it is the
and he does rightly in hoping t that his prayer will be effective. Shame, al-Ghazali feels, n
creature's sense of his shortcomig;and ifY i that about presence
of the Creator. The heart is 11 Present it is concerned and when faith rnce of ~thisa world ands
its affairs, Ill the n~ith a sense of the insigni „ Your heart is Present,'
then resent in prayer. the heart is p
t. i•htfall.
t Kawdat of-T it bhp idp'ay tioh, e x 261. noon and sunwCt, un'ct and n 6
At dash, noun.
s Maya, 1, p 130
Idea u/ the Ha[)', PP
(;f.It.att,, r;,'
roo AL-GHAZALI'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY
al-Ghazali says, " when you enter the presence of one accounted
great (in this world) who is, after all, a creature, with no real
power to injure you or do you good ; ought it not then to be
present when you are in confidential communion with the King
of kings, in Whose hand are both this world and the next, Who
controls all that comes to you, of good or ill ? "'

These things, then, al-Ghazali felt to be necessary if Prayer
was to be an inward reality and he was doubtless speaking from
his own experience. He felt, too, that the external ritual and
formalities which accompany prayer must be realised to have a
spiritual significance : they were but outward symbols of an
inner reality. Of the ritual purification which preceded prayer al-Ghazali writes : "When you
purify the place in which you
pray, which is your outermost container, and then your garments, which are your nearest
covering and f hen your skin, which is your inner rind, do not forget your kernel, which is your
real essence, 2 and that is your heart. So strive to cleanse it by repentance and contrition and
therewith purify your inmost self, for He Whom you worship is looking thereon." 3 This
purification of the inmost self means that it is emptied and prepared for the Divine action, for the
ultimate purpose of this purification is that the glory of God and His majesty should be
manifested to the soul. " The knowledge of God," al-Ghazali says, " will never enter and abide in
the soul in very truth until all else but God has been removed from it." 4
Then, too, just as in the ritual prayer, the outward face is turned towards the qibla (the direction
of Mecca) and away from any other direction, so also during prayer the heart should be turned
towards God and to nothing else. " Let the face of your heart," he writes, " be turned in the same
direction as the
• 1hyd, I, p. 145, Cf. the Catholic mystic Angela of Foligno, "Prayer is nothing else save the
manifestation of, God and oneself and this manifestation is perfect and true humility. For
humility consists in the soul beholding God and itself as it should."
• Cf. po. 71,
72 above.
• fhya, f, pp. 148.
• 1hya, ill, p. iii. Cf. a modern writer : "The fundamental discipline and the fundamental duty in
the face of the Eternal is prayer .. , it is more than an outpouring and iar more than an entreating.
It is a gripping of the self by an act of painful and arduous abstraction, from the concerns of time
and space, for the purpose of facing eternity and speaking with the Eternal." R. Barker, The
5,beclator, November 25th, 1938.
AL-GHAZALI'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY ror
Jface of your body and know that the heart does not turn towards God except when it is freed
from the thought of all but Him."' He writes elsewhere on this subject, When you turn your face
towards the qibla, then turn your heart towards the Creative Truth and do not rejoice, for you
have no reason for it, but remember how you must stand in His Presence on the Day of udgment.
Therefore stand on the feet of fear and hope, detaching your heart from regard for this world and
for mankind and transfer your concern to Him, for He will not reject one who take refuge in
Him, nor disappoint a suppliant." 2
al-Ghazali had much experience of the distraction of thought by which prayer is hindered, but he
knew that only those whose prayer was directed solely towards God in humility and adoration
could receive the Divine illumination and apprehend the mysteries revealed by God to His saints.
In player alone were those mysteries revealed and the revelation came only to that one whose
heart was set upon God alone. "When you can say,
My living and my dying belong to God,' then," says al-Ghazali, " you may know that this is the
state of one who is lost to himself and found to his Lord." For when the creature, so lost to self,
approaches God in prayer, He raises the veil between Himself and His servant and meets him
face to face, 3
His own prayers and thanksgivings show that al-Ghazali had this experience of the inner reality
of prayer. lie quotes the words of the Prophet to the effect that he who gives praise to God in the
midst of those who are heedless is like a green tree in the midst of plants that are withered, and
like one who fights among those who flee. Again lie declares that the dwellers in the celestial
regions look down upon those earthly habitations whence prayers and praise rise up to God and
see them as shining stars, and he adds his own petition, which he used to offer on entering the
Divine sanctuary : " 0 Lord, give light unto my heart and my tongue and my hearing and my
sight, and set light behind me and before me and above me, Lord, give me light." 4 One of the
briefest of his prayers is none the less significant because of its brevity : " Lord, make my secret
thoughts
J
3 1hpd, 1, pp. 152, 149.
afinhaj al-'AriJin, p. uo. ' Ihyd, I, p. 292.
' 1111'u, 1, p. 148.
Toe AL-GHAZALI'S LIFE AND PERSONALII'Y
better than my outward acts and make my outward acts good." i
We have al-Ghazali's prayer when he bowed in worship before
the Most High : " 0 Lord, Thee do I adore and in Thee do I put
my trust and unto Thee do I commit myself. I bow my face
in adoration to Him Who created and fashioned it, Who gave
unto me hearing and vision. Blessed art Thou, Who hast
created all things well: with heart and mind I worship Thee,
my soul trusteth in Thee. I yield me to Thy grace, in acknowledg
ing my transgression, and I seek Thy face therein, for Thou alone
canst forgive sin." At the close of prayer he would say : " 0
Lord, Thou art peace, and from Thee cometh peace. Thou
hast blessed me, 0 Lord Most Glorious, Who art worthy of all
praise." 2
Thanksgiving played a large part in al-Ghazali's prayers and
many of these lauds are very beautiful. For the double gift of
purification and the means thereto he offers thanks, saying
" Praise be to God Who bath shown favour to His servants and
bath called them to serve Him in purity and for the cleansing of their inward selves hath
outpoured upon their hearts His radiance and His lovingkindriess, and for their outward forms
hath prepared the purification of pure and limpid water." 3 al-Ghazali offers thanks to the All-
Glorious Who is also the AllCompassionate, when he says : " Praise be to God Whose glory
passes the comprehension of the hearts and minds of His creatures, and they remain amazed
thereat, by the radiance of Whose Light their vision is dazzled, Who looks upon the secrets of
men's inmost selves, Who is aware of what is hidden within their consciences, Who orders all
things by His sovereign will, and none is His counsellor or gives Him aid : Who turns men's
hearts to repentance and forgives their transgressions: Who casts a veil over their sins and
comforts them in their sorrowsto Him be praise." 4
al-Ghazali gives thanks also for the grace of God towards His saints in calling them into
fellowship with Him through prayer, saying: " Praise be to God, Who bath magnified His grace
towards the elect among His creatures and His chosen,
' Suhki, Tab., IV, p. 178. 9 7hyd, 1, p. iii.
144, 1, PP. 292, 293. ' Ihyd, 111, p. 2.
AL-GHAZALL'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY 103
in that He bath made them to be concerned only with His fellowship and bath bestowed upon
them the joy of His grace and bath made their hearts to despise the goods of this world and its
splendour, so that each one from whose mind the veils have been withdrawn is content to be
alone with God and becomes accustomed to the contemplation of the Divine Majesty, in solitude,
apart with Him, and is separated thereby from fellowship with mankind, even though it were his
closest friend-to Him be
praise." i
We have, finally, al-Ghazall's prayers that at the end of this mortal life he may.pass into the
presence of his Lord among the number of His saints, entering His presence as one who already
knows and loves Him : " 0 Lord, let us not pass from this world -i except as gnostics, perfected
in gnosis, submerged in the ocean of Thine Unicity, set free from the fetters of this world and its
pomps and vanities, through Thy mercy, 0 Thou Most Merciful." 2 Akin to this is his prayer :
"We ask God the All-Great to place us among His chosen and His elect, whom He has guided to
the truth and directed along the path, whom He has inspired with the recollection of Himself, so
that they are always mindful of Him : whom He has purified from the defilement of the self, so
that they choose Him in preference to all other, whom He has appropriated unto Himself, so that
they should adore none but Him." 3
But al-Ghazali was never unaware that the good life must mean not only fellowship with God,
but also, and as a necessary consequence, fellowship with man and service to him. It was
necessary for him to find time-for solitude and quiet so that he might hear the Voice of God
speaking to him, but the spiritual experience which he gained in these times of solitude must bear
its fruit in the daily walk of life with other men : the mystic revelations which came to him from
the opening of his heart and mind to the Divine indwelling, were given to inspire him to a higher
service of humanity. Hence his return to teaching
work at the end of his life and his association with his fellow
1 fhya, 11, p. 197
' Aia'&ii al-Duds, p. 188. s illuuigidh, p. 34.
Y
104
AL-GHAZALT'S LIFE AND PERSONALITY
Sufis and with beginners on the mystic Way, in his latter days at Tus. " To be a Sufi," he said, "
means to abide continuously in God and to live at peace with men : whoever abides and deals
rightly with men, treating them with unfailing kindness, is a Sufi. The right attitude towards your
fellow-men is that you should not lay burdens upon them according to your own desire, but
rather burden yourself according to their desire. In your dealings with others, treat them as you
would wish them to treat you, for the faith of God's servant is not made perfect unless he desires
for others what lie desires for himself."'
So al-Ghazali gave his last years on earth to the guidance of others on the road by which he had
himself been led to a know-. ledge of-and fellowship with-God.
I Ayyuha'l-Walad, PP 40, 46. I7ulas t at-lasanif fi'l-7'asawwii.f, pp. 2r, 28.
PART IT.
AL-GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING
CHAPTER VIII
al-Ghazi li's Sources. Neo-Platonism and Arab Philosophy.
Judaism and Christianity. Islamic and Sufi Sources.
The wide scope of al-Ghazali's studies, aided by his extensive travels, enabled him to draw upon
many sources for the ideas which he develops, and the terminology which he uses, in setting
forth his mystical teaching, though it is always to be borne in mind that its chief and most
essential source was his own personal experience. He himself had experienced illumination and
ecstasy, he had received revelations which it was not lawful to describe, he had entered into that
direct knowledge of the Divine which was incommunicable, but it was this experience which
enabled him to give his teaching with the assurance born of his personal conviction of the truth
of what he taught.
His study of philosophy had led him to reject and refute many of its conclusions, but none the
less, he was deeply influenced by Greek thought and especially by Neo-Platonism, and this
influence is to be seen throughout his mystical writings. From Plotinus is derived the idea of God
as the One Reality, the Source of all being, the All-Perfect, transcending all known attributes and
existences. " He is the One, the First and the Last, the Outward and the Inward, but He is neither
body nor substance nor accident, nor like anything that exists.... He does not exist in anything
nor does anything exist in Him, for lie is too exalted to be contained in any place and too holy to
be limited by time, for He was before time and place were created, I-le alone is self-existent in
His essence." " Again al-Ghazali writes : " He cannot be apprehended by the understanding, none
can apprehend the One but the One."' So also Plotinus had written of the One, the First-Existent,
Transcendent,
1 1111-ii. 1, P. ^,q. 1laarlal al-T6lilin, p. 153. Cf. a4Riedlal al-Lad+nni)-ya,
pp. 24, sb. C also Chapter 1X below. IOj
rob AL-GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING
Unconditioned, Unknowable : " The One, transcending intellect,
transcends knowledge, thus the One is in truth beyond all
statement, the All-transcending possesses, alone of all, true being,
and is not a thing among things." 1
Of the Godhead al-Ghazali declares that' from eternity He alone
existed, there was no other with Him, and again he says : " Know
that all that is other than God veils you from Him . , . if it were
not for your alienation, you would look upon Him face to face."
• The freedom of the heart from all that is other than God."
he writes elsewhere, " is needful if it is to be pre-occupied with
the love of Him and the direct experience of Him." So, too,
Plotinus writes of the Supreme as containing " no otherness,"
everpresent with us, and we with It, when we put " otherness "
away. 2
It is from Neo-Platonism also that al-Ghazali derives his
inclination towards the doctrine of emanation. He speaks
of the Unitarian seeing things as a multiplicity, but he sees the
Many as emanating from the One, the Supreme, and again he states that God is the First in
relation to existent things, since all have emanated from Him in their order. a In the Plotinian
teaching the first emanation from the One was Universal Mind and al-Ghazali also makes use of
this term (al-'aql al-awwal), which he calls the Prior of all existences, that which is stronger,
nobler, and nearer to the One, itself perfect because of its relationship to the One, and making
perfect that which comes after it, When God wishes to bestow revelation on a creature, He makes
use of the First Intelligence, " Universal Mind becomes the teacher and the sanctified soul the
taught." 4 Again al-Ghazali states that the human intelligence is derived from Universal
Intelligence as the light from the sun, for it is related to an individual, while the First Intelligence
is absolute, without such relationship, and his commentator adds: " The First Intelligence is a
pure
• Plotinus, Ennead V, 3. 12, 13.

° I>,ya, I, p. 80. Rawdal al-Tdlibin, p. 128. Kitdb al-Arba'in, p. 143, Ennrad VI, 9. S.
Ikyd, IV, pp. 212, 217.
' Icitnb al-Ma'urif al-'Aghyya, Us. 2rb, iib. al-Risdlat at-Laduniyya, PP- 41, 43. 11a'drij al-gads,
p. 15, Sir, al-'Alamavrr rya liashf ina fi'lDlarayn
P. 33, a work arrributed to al-Ghazali, though probably edited by one of his disciples, perhaps
from notes dictated by al-Ghazali.
AL-GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING 107
light outpoured upon all things, for it is the spirit of all and by the gnostics it has been called the
Heart of the Universe." I
From Universal Mind emanates Universal Soul, which in its turn gives rise to the phenomenal
world and to individual human souls. The human soul, says Plotinus, , is a Divine thing,
belonging to another order than that of sense." According to his teaching, the human soul
resembles the Divine Nature in containing three principles, the Intellectual, which is the true self,
the Reasoiiing Soul, which represents the normal, human life and the \iiimal Soul, which is the
irrational nature. 2 So, too, at-Gha ill refers to Universal Soul-related to Universal Mind as Eve
to Adam, and next to it in honour and nobility and receptivity'- as the second emanation from the
One, and that from which individual souls proceed, 4 ".Know," he says " that when Universal
Soul takes possession of a body, its presence there is called a human soul." 5 al-Ghazali also
refers to the human soul as a Divine thing, belonging, not to the sensual, but the spiritual world
(cf. pp. 142 ff. below). That human soul, in al-Ghazali's teaching, includes the highest self (al-
nafs al-nttltnm' inna) which he also calls the " rational " soul (al-nafs al-natiga), to be identified
with the heart and spirit of man, which is Divine in its origin. I There is, secondly, the "
reproachful " soul (al-naIs al-laaiilna) which predominates with the normal human being, in
whom the voice of conscience is at work to correct the downward pull of the " flesh," and
thirdly, there is the " headstrong " soul (al-nafs al-alnntira), which is the irrational self, under the
control of the animal nature.-, al-Ghazali's cosmology, comprising the Divine World ('a?run al-
malaktit), the Celestial World ('clam al jabarfit) and the. material, phenomenal world ('iilam
alan-ulk ua'l-skallada) is in accordance with
r .11-izdn al-'Anml, p. 107.

s Ennead, 111, 4. 3 ff. V, 1. 6, to.
s al-Risdlat a!-Laduniyya, p. 43. Cf. also bli'rdj al-Sdlikin, p. 23.
1 Sirr al-'.dlainal',i, p. 33. .3Ia'&rj al-Quds, pp. 134 f1.
• lla'arij al-'Agliyya, fol. rib. Universal Soul is compared by al-Ghazali with the Sun, which
sheds its light upon all things exposed to it-it is called the Tenth Sphere and the Command ('arnr)
from the dlata' ( =UniversiA Mind. Cf. my al-Risdlal al-Laduniyya, I.H.A.S. April, 1938, p.
1i9.), and the individual soul is said to come forth from it like the spark from the flint. Cf.11ia .-
Ijiaibat -Js'ilat Ibrr al-'Arabi. Paris 5291, fol. 138b.
• al-Itisdlat AI-Ladanfyra, pp. 27 fl. Cf. Chapter la below, pp. ft.
n6Risulal al-Ladioiiyya, p. 31. Cf. Suras, LXXV, 2 : X1f, 53.
Inti AL-GHAZAI-I'S MYSTICAL TEACHING
this three-fold principle, t and so also is his teaching on the three
stages of the soul's ascent to God. 2
al-Ghazali's constant use of imagery derived from Light,
though it is based to a limited extent upon the Qur'an, is also
Hellenic in origin, especially in his identification of knowledge with
light (cf. p.176 above). "Ignorance," he says, "is like a state of
blindness and darkness, and knowledge is like vision and light." a
Especially is this true of the knowledge which comes from above, the Light of God, which, says
al-Ghazali, is " the radiance from the Lamp of the Invisible, shed upon a heart which is pure, at
leisure, receptive." 4 Plotinus had also called this knowledge the light within the soul which
enlightened it, a light lit from above which-gave the soul its brighter life.5 Again al-Ghazali
writes of earthly lights kindled by celestial lights and these in their turn by the Light Supernal
(al-Nur al-aq~d al-a'la), above which there is no light and from which light is shed upon all other
things. 6 Elsewhere he says : " God is Manifest (al-Zdhir) and by Him all things are made
manifest, for that which is manifest in itself, which makes all other things manifest, is Light, and
whenever existence (al-wujiid) confronts non-existence, then undoubtedly existence is made
manifest and there is no darkness darker than non-existence. Now that which is free from the
darkness of non-existence, yea, even from the possibility of non-existence, Which brings all
things out of non-existence into the manifestation of existence, is worthy to be called Light.
Existence is light outpoured upon all things from the Light of His Essence, Who is the Light of
the heavens and the earth."' Plotinus, too, speaks of material forms, containing light, which need
another light so that their own light may be manifested : in like manner celestial beings " all
lightsome " need another and a greater Light, so that they may be visible to themselves and
others." That Light, to al-Ghazali, as to Plotinus, is the
Ultimate Reality (al-Mawljiid al-Hagq).9
Cf. Ihyd, IV, p. 216; and al-Risdlat al-Laduniyya, p. 23. Cf. Chapters X, XI, XII, below.
• al-Risalat al-Ladunivya, p. 25.
• Ibid., P. 43. Cf. also Ihyd, III, p. 16.
Ennead V, 3. 8.
.• llishkdl al-Anwdr, pp. tio, iii. 2 Ennead, VI, 7. 21, 22.
al-nlagsad al-Asnd, p. 70. i ;11ishkul al-Anudr, p. 113.
It is from Neo-Platonism also that al-Ghazali derives his idea of God not only as Light, but as
Supreme Beauty, and of love as the natural inclination of the soul towards beauty, whether
terrestrial or Divine. Plotinus had taught that the original source of Love was to be found in the
tendency of the soul towards pure beauty, and he observes that, while Beauty addresses itself
chiefly to the sight, it has an attraction for the hearing, too, and minds that lift themselves above
the realms of sense are aware of beauty in condufRft and action, in character and in intellectual
pursuits and they see the beauty of the virtues. The soul, too, is conscious of kinship with what it
loves. Beauty is that which truly calls out Love and so it is that the soul, passing over all that is
lovely here, and looking beyond it, loves the Supreme Good, the Divine Beauty, which is the
ultimate Source of all beauty, and, loving God, seeks to be one with Him. 1 So also al-Ghazali
says of Beauty that the eye delights in looking upon what is beautiful, and the ear in listening to
beautiful music, and adds that goodness and beauty exist in other than objects of sense, in
character and knowledge and conduct and the virtues, and he writes in conclusion : " It cannot be
denied that where Beauty exists, it is natural to love it... . The greater the beauty, the greater the
love, and since complete and perfect Beauty is found only in God, He alone can be worthy of
true love."
al-Ghazali, in his mystical writings, refers to the " intoxication " of love : was there ever lover
who was not drunk with love ? For His lovers, God pours out a draught from the cup of His love,
and by that draught they are intoxicated, rapt away from themselves, So also Plotinus had taught
that beyond knowledge is Love, which is " intoxication " and the highest joy, and " to be drunken
is better than to be too staid for such revels." I
al-Ghazali's doctrine of the music of the spheres and his belief that the harmony of earthly music
reminded the soul
of the celestial harmonies it had heard in the. heavenly places
' Ennead 1, 6. t. III, 5. i. V, 8. 7, 8. VI, 7. 22, 31 ; 9, 9.
2 Ihyd, IV, p. 257, 256, 258. Cf. the famous passage in Plato's Symposium in which Diotima
describes Divine Beauty a5 the supreme object of Love.
' lhyd, IV, p. 300. Raw4all al-T'dlibin, p. 131. Cf, also Qasida al-Tii iyya p. 2i9. Ennead, VI, 7.
35
t
IOC)
t
110
before it descended into this world, and therefore stirred it up
to joy and longing, I and his view of the value of music, both
as a source of delight and as a means of bringing the seeker nearer
to God, find their counterpart in Platonic teaching. 2
al-Ghazali also accepts the theory of the Seven Heavens, which
played a part in Platonic and Neo-Platonic thought, a and he
recounts a tradition embodying this belief, which told how God
created seven angels to guard the Seven Heavens, and how the
guardian angels mount with the good deeds which a man has
done, from morn till eve, work which shines like the sunlight,
until they reach the First Heaven, and there the work is rejected
by the Angel who guards the gate, because the servant was
guilty of slander. Then the guardian angels come with more
good works which they praise and magnify until they reach the
Second Heaven, and there are stopped by the Angel guarding
it, because in what he did the servant was seeking worldly ends and boasted of his works among
men. The guardian angels then ascended with work adorned with the light of almsgiving and
fasting and prayer, which excited the admiration of their fellow-angels, and they passed with it as
far as the Third Heaven, but were brought to a halt by the Angel there, who rejected the work
because the servant was arrogant towards his fellow-men. Once again they ascended with work
shining like the stars, a radiance due to the man's praises and prayers and pilgrimages, until they
reached the Fourth Heaven, where the work was rejected because of the servant's pride in it.
Then they ascended as far as. the Fifth Heaven, with work adorned like a bride coming unto her
bridegroom, but the Angel who kept the gate refused to let it pass, because the doer was jealous
of those whose works were like his own. Once more the angels ascended with the servant's good
works of prayer and almsgiving and pilgrimages and fasting, and reached the Sixth Heaven, but
the Angel forbade them to pass, because that servant had no pity on the afflicted, but rather
rejoiced in their affliction. Again they ascended with the work of fasting and prayer and
expenditure for others
Cf. p. go above.
' Cf. The Replibhc, Bk. III. Phaedo, XXX\'[, SLIT. Timuetts, passim. The Repablu, Bk. X.
Mentioned also briefly in the Qur'an, Sara LXVII, 3.
LXXVIII, 12. The scheme is found also in the Talmud.
AL-GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING III
and alms and striving and piety, work resounding like thunder and shining like the sun,
accompanied by three thousand angels, and they bore it up to the Seventh Heaven, but once more
the Angel of the gate barred their advance, because the servant had not done his work for the
sake of God alone, but had sought therein others beside God, seeking exaltation with the divines,
and fame with the learned, and reputation among men.
Yet once more the angels ascended with good works as before and also a fair show of religion,
and silence and the recollection of God, and the angels of heaven escorted that work until they
had pierced all the veils and they brought it before God Most High. Then they stood in His
Presence and bore witness to that good work done in sincerity, for His sake. Then God said unto
them, " Ye are the guardians of My servant's work, but I am He Who looks upon his soul. He
was not Seeking Me, in what he did, he sought another than Myself." So the work was rejected
and the Seven Heavens joined in execration of that faithless servant. I
al-Ghazali owes something to the Platonic theory of Ideas, of things in this world being only a
type or symbol or imperfect copy of the archetype, the reality " laid up in the heavens." He likens
them to the images which appear in sleep, compared with what is seen in waking hours. So, too,
the capacity of the human mind in this life is like that of one who is asleep and what it perceives
is but a type of the heavenly reality. But when men die, they awake from the dream of life and
know things as they really are. Again he says that if there were no relationships between the
visible world and the world invisible and no link between them, any ascent from one world to the
other would be inconceivable. Therefore, by the Divine mercy, the visible world was made-'to
correspond to the world invisible and there is nothing in this world but is a symbol of something
in that other world. 2 " The Ka'ba," he says elsewhere, " is an outward symbol in this material
world of that Presence, .not seen by the eye, which indwells the Divine world, just as the body is
an outward symbol in this visible, phenomenal world, of the heart,
1hya, Ill, pp. 255, 256
I Y ktva. 1V, p. 'i. ]Iishkal. p. 1-4. Cf. Plato, The Republic, Sk. X.
Ph ieiu, Chip..lq. Cf. aJ o p. 155 belo"'
70
1X2 AL-GIRAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING
which cannot be seen by the eye, for it belongs to the world of the Unseen, and this material,
visible world is a means of ascent to the invisible, spiritual world for him to whom God has
opened the door."'
These conceptions, and others in his writings which bear traces of a Neo-Platonic origin, al-
Ghazali may have derived from his own personal study of the Greek writers, in Arabic
translations. He refers to Plato's theories, 2 and Arabicr translations of the Republic, the Timerus,
and the Plurdo, for which Christian translators were mainly responsible, were available from the
ninth century onwards. a He had also direct access to the teaching of Plotinus, in the so-called
Theology of Aristotle, a translation into Arabic of Porphyry's commentary on the Enneads, IV,
V, and VI, and from this undoubtedly he derived both ideas and terminology : sometimes whole
phrases and paragraphs embodying the teaching of Plotinus are transferred to his own work and
adapted to the purposes of his own mystical teaching. a
But al-Ghazali probably owed some of his knowledge of Platonism and Neo-Platonism to the
writings of the Arab philosophers, notably al-Kindi (ob. 260 /873), considered to be the founder
of Arab philosophy, but not an original thinker, rather one who founded his teaching on the
Greek commentators of Alexandria. He was also interested in the effect of music, not only as a
source of pleasure to the hearing, but as an influence on the spirit of man. 5 al-Kindi was
responsible for a number of translations from the Greek.'
The work of systematisation begun by al-Kindi was continued

by al-Farabi (ob. 339!950), who is mentioned by al-Ghazali
as a representative Islamic philosopher.' a1-Farnbi accepted

1hyd, 1, p. 242.
• Cf. Mi'rdj al-Sdlikin, p. 24. ,11ungidh, p. 9 and elsewhere.
' Cf. my Studies in Early aiysticisnl, pp. 715 if and A Guillaume, Th Legacy of Islam, pp 250 ft
Cf also Fl. G. Farmer, Tke Influence of jlusts from Arabic Sources, pp. 6 ff.
• For an account of the relation of Sufism generally to Neo-Platoni_m cf. E. H. Whinfield, Lau-
iYih, pp. 1'I 11. pp. 52 ff. and R. A. Nicholson, The ilyaies of Islam, pp.t2ff. and l)fwdnSlmnes-
i-Tab,iz,pp.XXXIIff. Also J.Oberrnann, Dcr Plrilosopkische and Religiose Subjectivisnuys
Ghazdlf, pp. 63, 64. And A. J. wensinek, Book of the Dove, pp. f.XXX ff.
• Cf. H. G. Farmer, op. cit., p. 16.
• Cf. L. Massignon, Text,•s Inedits. pp. 175 ff.
7 .1lungidh, p. ii,
AL-GBAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING rr3
the Neo-Platonic system of emanation and emphasized the desire of the human being to enter
into the closest union with Universal
Mind so dealthe rlde, before its stressed the pinto pre-existence m of the
s material
soul in th
world.
al-Ghazali mentions also that he had studied the writings of
the Ikhwan al-Safa',r a group of philosophers which was formed
in Basra in the tenth century, who taught the doctrine of emana
tion, and held that all good gifts were due to the outpouring
of the Divine grace and the irradiation of the Divine light upon
Universal Mind and thence upon individual, human souls, 2
They also taught the doctrine of the music of the spheres, of
which souls in this temporal world are reminded by earthly
melodies. s
Ibn Sina (Avicenna. ob. 428 /1087), also mentioned by
al-Ghazali as one of his sources for the study of philosophy, 4 gave a more complete expression
to Arab philosophy. He held thatthereforethe human soul was pre existent, Divine in its origin,
and
a prisoner in thi world and always filled with the desire to return to its proper home. s He taught
the need of the rational soul for inner purification and moral perfection, in order that it might be
fitted to receive the Divine illumination, and he, too, was interested in the influence of music
upon the soul. His teaching on Prayer reaches a high level in his declaration that the inner
significance of Prayer is the contemplation of God. He states that in Prayer the soul which is, as
it were, disembodied, at leisure, free from the effects of time and space, contemplates God in
intellectual contemplation and looks upon Him spiritually. In interior prayer the soul seeks from
Absolute Being its own perfection, through its contemplation of Him, and its highest happiness
through its direct knowledge of Him. Upon such a soul the Divine grace (faytl) descends as it
prays."
It was through his study of these Arab philosophers, who based their philosophy so largely upon
Neo .'atonism, that al-Ghazali
s Muagidh, p. Ibid., 1, p• 152, III, p. too.
i~
" Ras Ikluan oul,old, III, p. 275• a Mungidh, p. rr.
284- Cf. Fatihat
afida ida on the Souf Ziya I3ey, Khardb1221i pp. which sees to be based
.1-11717,12m, `p. 40, and Qas1da at -Ta'tyya, PP•
un Ibn Sina's Qafida. above 6 Mdhiyat al-, aldt, pp. 37, 39• Cf. Pp. 99
Y
x
X14 AL-GHAZALT'S MYSTICAL TEACHING
must have added greatly to the knowledge of Greek philosophy
which he had secured from his own reading of the Greek writers. I
al-Ghazali's mysticism owes a certain amount to Judaistic
sources : he makes use of some Jewish traditions and was pro
bably acquainted With the Old Testament. The stress he lays

on the Kingdom of Heaven ('Alum al-Malakiil, the Divine
World), though the term malakut itself is Aramaic, is due most
probably to the use of the word in the Qu'ran 2 and to a signi
ficance derived from Neo-Platpnic sources. 3 He frequently
quotes traditions concerning Adam, Abraham, Moses, David,
Solomon, Jonah, job and other Old Testament figures, which
must have come ultimately from Old Testament sources or
Jewish traditions. He makes frequent reference to the Chronicles
or Traditions of David (Akhbar Da'ud), which appears to be a
definite work to which he had access. 4 He also refers to the
Tawral and the Psalms and " the writings of Moses and Abraham,"
as being inspired in order to summon men to their spiritual
heritage. s
al-Ghazali also often draws upon Jewish sources to illustrate
his teaching, and his religious tolerance, already mentioned,
enables him to hold up devout Israelites as an example to the faithful of Islam, e.g., he relates
how a certain Israelite worshipped God in sincerity for many years, and God Most High desired
to manifest his sincerity to His angels. He therefore sent one of His angels to him with the
message : " The Lord Most High asks of thee : ' How long wilt thou exert thyself and weary
thyself in serving Me; since thou art destined for Hell ? ' " The angel delivered the message, to
which the worshipper replied : " 1 44 a servant and the servant's business is to serve He is the
Lard and what is the Lord's business none knows but lie.'`. The angel returned to his Lord and
said : " My God, Thou dost know what is secret and hidden and Thou (lost know what Thy
servant said." Then God declared : " If this servant,
1 For a more detailed account of al-Ghazah's indebtedness to the Arab philosophers cf. my al-
Risalat al-Laduniyya, J.R.A.S. April, 1938. pp. 183 ff.
75- VIh 84.
' For a full discussion of aI-Ghazall's use of the term Malaktit cf. A. J, wensinck, The Relation
belqueen Ghazdlf's Cosmology and his Mysticisrro, pp. 2 ff.
4ya, III, PP. 47, 290,"322. IV, pp. 285, 291, 295. 499• Ihya, IV, P. 08.
AL-GI-AZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING 115
in spite of his weakness, did not deny Us, how should We deny him Our grace ? Bear witness, 0
My angels, that We have forgiven his sins," a story which may be based on that of job, and
aliGhazali adds the lines
" For eyes to be wakeful, except for Thy sake, is vain, That eyes should weep, save for loss of
Thee, is folly,
and the words of the Prophet : " However you may live, you will die : how great soever your
love, you will be separated therefrom : whatever you do, you will be requited therefor." 1
al-Ghazali undoubtedly owed much to Christian sources, and had made a careful study of the
New Testament, using the Arabic texts, accepted in his time. In one of his writings' he bases his
arguments on the Fourth Gospel and quotes also from St. Mark. Here he is refuting the Christian
doctrine, but as in the case of philosophy, he made a thorough study of the teaching which he
wishes to refute and not unfrequently he makes use of New Testament texts, and traditions
derived from them, to
illustrate his mystical teacanhioctridng.neFromthat C St. John's Gospel he
had derived the Christihrist was One with God, 3 but this he regards as the error of one who
looks in a mirror
which reflects a coloured object, and supposes that reflection to be the form of the mirror, but
such a one is mistaken, for the mirror in itself has no colour, its function is to reflect colours on
its surface, but those who consider only what is apparent, think
it is the colour of the mirror itself. So, too, one who does not know the nature of glass and wine,
when he sees a glass containing
wine does not perceive the distinction between them and some
times he says : " There is no wine," and sometimes he says " There is no glass." al-Ghazali, in
this connection quotes the
lines of the poet: '
" Fine is the glass and the wine is fine : They are commingled and seem to be one, As if there
were only wine and no glass, Or as if there only glass and no wine."
I
1w
s Khulasat al-tasdsdf fi'i-Tasawaruf. pp. 8, 9.
• ai-Radd al-,Jamtl Ii Ildhiyat 'Isd sarfh al-Injil, Ay3 Sutiya 2246. Cf•
also C. Padwick, The Moslem World, April, 1939- -
r St. John X, 30.
• ibn 'Abbhd. Cf. Ibn Khallikan, op. cit., 1, p. 215•
116 AL-GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING
Such, he says, was the statement of that one l who said : " I
am the Creative Truth," and the poet when he wrote
"I am He Whom I love, and He Whom I love is I."2
It was in this way, al-Ghazali considered, that the Christians
regarded Christ, for they beheld the radiance of the Light of
God shining within Him, a But he held that they were deluded
in supposing that the Divine nature could be made one with the
human (ittihdd al-Ldhist b'il-ndsut), like one who sees a star
reflected in a mirror, or in a sheet of water, and stretches out
his hand to take it, but he is deceived. +
But he constantly quotes the words of Christ. In reference to
religious teachers who are lovers of this world and not spiritually
minded, al-Ghazali gives the lines
The shepherd of the sheep protects them from the wolf,
But what if the shepherds include wolves among them ? "s
and also the verses
0 ye who are righteous, 0 salt of the earth,
If it loses its savour, what use is the salt ? "6
Again al-Ghazali observes that most men are unaware of their
own faults; a man sees the mote in his brother's eye and fails
to see the beam in his own. 7 He gives also the story of the rich i
1 AL-GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING 117
al-Ghazali refers to Christ's denunciation of the scribes and
Pharisees in quoting as His words : " Evil teachers are like a
rock which fell upon the mouth of the river, which neither drank
of it nor let the water escape to water the crops handsome fields.
They are like tombs, which outwardly app
well-constructed, while inside they containf notes ingn but Odead
men's bones." He also gives the saying J
teachers, be not like the sieve which lets the good flour through
while the chaff remains : so also ye bring forth wisdom from
your mouths, while secret hatred remains in your hearts."'
al-Ghazali quotes also from Christ's parable of the Last judgment,
when he writes : " The doctor, physicist and astrologer are
doubtless right each in his particular branch of knowledge,
but they do not see that illness is, so to speak, a cord of love
by which God draws to Himself the saints, concerning whom He
has said : ` I was sick and ye visited Me not.
He writes elsewhere : " I have seen it written in the Gripes
We have sung unto you and you did not rejoice : we have striven piped unto you and you did n~h
dance,' oiaGod, and youed d not
to arouse longing in you, by praise P
long for Him.' " 3 Another Gospel quotation wrongly attributed
to the old Testament, is contained in the tradition that God
didst not visit Me," and
young man" as an example of the snare of riches and worldliness
to those who seek spiritual perfection. As an incentive to
trust in God (lawakkul) he repeats the words of Jesus : " Consider
the birds of the air, they sow not, neither do they reap nor gather
into barns and God feedeth them day by day,""
I Husayn b. Maosur al-Hallaj (ob. 309!932). Cf. L. Massignon, La Passion
dàl-,Hallaj.
' Hallaj, who completed the lines as follows
We are two spirits, indwelling one body,
When thou seest me, thou seest Him,
And when
a Cf. St. Joh n, I, 14- " ?1Ve beheld His glo10u dost us ."
ry, g orysas of the Only-Begotten
of the Father" and VIII, 12. Also St. Paul, II. Cor. IV, 6. "The light
of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ."
al-.hlagsad al-Asna, PP. 74, 75. Ibya, II, p, 150.
Ihya, I, p. 54, a re-echo of John X and Matt. VII, 15.
lhya, III, 54- Matt. V, 13.
° Ihya, TV, p, 2o CCf. Matt. VIT, 3.
f. Matt. XIX, 16, 23.
° Ihyfi, IV, p. 230.. Cf. Matt. Vr, 26. XXIII, !
f said to Moses : " I was sick and thou
Moses asked : " 0 Lord, how came that about ? " The Lord
replied : " My servant so-and-so was sick and thou didst not
visit him and if thou hadst done so, thou wouldest have found Me
with him." ° al-Ghazali quota also Christ's words : " When
you give alms, do it so that your left hand knoweth not wliat
your right hand doeth, and He Who seeth in secret shall rc\:::r:I
you openly. And when you fast, wash your face and anoint
your head, lest any other than your Lord should know of it." s
As an incentive to otherworldliness, al-Ghazali quotes a tradi
tion that t garmentis said: godly efearSeasoning nd gMly over-robes is otflt
My unerg
I FalihaI al-'tllirn, pp ,a, IS Cf. Matt., 13. 27.
2 The alchemy of Happiness, p. 37 (Irons the Hindustani).
s Ihyri, IT, p. 248. Cf. Dlatt. X1, 16.
4 lhva, IV, p. 263. Cf- matt, aw, 43. 45
3 Ilna, t\', p. 289, Cf. Matt. VI, 3, 4, 17, IS.
rr8 AL-GHaZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING
(i.e., the garb of the ascetic). My fire in winter is exposure to the sun and My lamp is the moon.
My means of transport are My own feet, and My food and My dessert are what the earth
brings forth. I go to sleep, possessing nothing, and I rise in the the morning, possessing nothing,
and there is none upon earth
who is richer than I." 1 al-Ghazali also gives a version of the Beatitudes which he may be
quoting from memory : " Blessed, are the meek upon earth, for they shall be exalted on the Day
of Resurrection. Blessed are the peacemakers in this life, for they shall inherit Paradise in the life
to come. Blessed are the pure in heart in this world, for at the Last Day they shall look upon
God." 2 He gives also Christ's actual words on retaliation and the Christian way of treating one's
enemies. 3
There are lines in al-Ghazali's Qacida al-Td'iyya which might
well have been suggested by a study of St. Paul's spiritual struggles.
" I have become at enmity with my self (the 'flesh For it bids me to sin and I seek to restrain it.
We are two antagonists, warring one with the other, Patiently I strive to overcome the flesh,
With the troops of lust, it takes the field against me. What can patience do to withstand its
onslaughts ? If I grow faint in the fight, the flesh waxes strong. Have mercy upon me, 0 Lord,
and forgive me,
For Thou didst create me and Thou art my Lord."4
From St. Paul, too, he may have taken the imagery he uses in saying that the one who, like the
snake, sloughs off the skin of lust and natural desire and puts on the breast-plate of the Canon
Law, will have the joy of receiving Divine enlightenment.4
There is a story told by al-Ghazali, which also contains elements of Pauline teaching, of how the
Sufi Ibrahim b. Adham visited a Christian monk named Sima'an. This monk had lived alone in
his cell for seventy years, his food consisting of a portion of chickpeas each night. Asked how lie
could endure it, he said that on a certain day in the year the monks from the monastery
r Ikya, III, p. 184. Cf. Matt. VIII, 20. VI, 25, 31 ff.,X, q. ' Viva, 111, p. 294. Cf. Matt. V, 5, 9, 8. '
1hya, IV. , 62. Cf. Matt. V, 38
OP. Cit., p. 215. Cf. Romans VII, 14, 25.
s al-,'7a'arif al-'Aghyya, fol. 8b. Cf. Ephesians. IV, 22; VI, 13, 14.
AL-GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING rig
opposite came to him and decorated his cell and walked in procession round it and did him
honour and whenever his soul grew weary of devotion, he reminded it of the glory of that hour
and so he was able to endure constant effort for the sake of one hour's glory. " Therefore, 0
Hanif," he said to Ibrahim, " endure tribulation for a brief space, for the sake of eternal glory," 1
and so gnosis was established in Ibrahim's heart. The monk asked him if he was satisfied or
wished for more, and Ibrahim asked' for still more. The monk told him to go out of the cell and,
having let down to him a small bucket containing twenty chickpeas, bade him go into the
monastery, for the monks had seen what had occurred. So Ibrahim entered the monastery, where
the Christians gathered round him and said to him " 0 Hanif, what did the Shaykh let down to
you ? " and Ibrahim told them that it was some of his food. Then they declared that they were
more worthy of it than he, and asked him to make a bargain with them : he offered the food to
them for twenty dinars, 2 and they paid the price. Ibrahim returned to the monk, who asked for
how much he had sold the food anc: Ibrahim replied : " For twenty dinars." Then the monk said "
You made a mistake ; if you had bargained with them for twenty thousand dinars, they would
have given you that sum. This is the glory of one whom you do not worship, and how great, then,
must be the glory of Him Whom you do worship. 0 Hanif, draw near unto your Lord Himself,
and give up visiting His creatures." 3
Writing of the Beatific Vision, al-Ghazali again quotes St. Paul's words, saying that God has
prepared for His faithful servants " what eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, and what has not
entered into the heart of man.' 4
There are many other quotations taken directly from the' New Testament, and traditions founded
upon the New Testament teachings, to be found throughout al-Ghazali's works and there
1 Cf. If. COT. iv, 17, " Our light affliction which is for the moment worketh for us more and
more an exceeding weight of glory," and Romans, VIII, 1S, " I reckon that the sufferings of this
present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed to usward."
• A dinar is a gold coin.
a Ihya, III, p. 288. Cf. Romans, I, 23, 25.
• Viva, IV, p, 267. Cf. I Car, ii, g.
11
i
120 AL-GIIAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING
is little doubt that he found it a source of inspiration to him in the development of his mystical
doctrine.'
During his travels in Syria and Egypt al-Ghazali must have come into contact with the mystical
teaching of Christians belonging to the Greek Church. 2 Especially in the teaching of John
Cassian (ob. A.D. 432), who had lived at Bethlehem as a monk and then settled in Egypt, there is
a remarkable resemblance to the doctrine developed later by al-Ghazali, for example, in his
division of spiritual knowledge into the active or practical
(apaKr1K11) and the theoretical or contemplative (Oewp,lnK)j).
One depends upon purification from sin and the acquirement of virtue, and the other on the
contemplation of the Divine, the power of penetrating into the hidden significance of God's
Word and seeing with the eye of the soul, a power which comes not through human learning, but
by purity of heart and the illumination of the Holy Spirit. But the contemplative wisdom, John
teaches, can be revealed only by acquiring the practical, for the stains of sin must first be
eradicated before the Vision of God can be attained. Only that one who understands his sins and
has striven to get rid of them can hope to attain to the mysteries revealed in contemplation. 3
So also al-Ghazali declares that spiritual knowledge ('ilm al-akhira) is to be divided into the
practical ('iltn al-ra'arala), which has to do with action, and the contemplative ('ilea al-
mukashafa). The "practical" knowledge has for its purpose action in accordance with what is
known, but the " contemplative " knowledge has for its purpose only revelation. The practical
knowledge leads on to the contemplative, as the latter leads on to the direct, intuitive experience
of God, which is the certainty which comes from the Divine Light " cast into " the heart of a
servant who, by unremitting effort, has purified his soul from the stains of sin. This certainty is
attained by an inward contemplation which is clearer and more glorious than
' Cf. At. Asin Palacies. La Mystique d'al-Ghasdli, pp. 81 ff. Oriental Studies pres.-Wed to &. G.
Broame, pp. 13 ff. Logia et Agrapha, Patrologia Orientalis XIII, XIX. Cf. also S. Zwemer,
Moslem World, April, 1917. Mishkat alAfasabfh, passim.
2 Cf. my Studies in Early Mysticism, Chapters IV, V, VI for a detailed account of Christian
Mysticism in the Near and Middle East and for the contacts between Christianity and Islam.
1 Coll. XIV, 1.3, 9.
AL-GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING ran
the vision of the eyes. But the joy of the Vision lies beyond contemplative knowledge, -_ as
contemplative knowledge lies beyond " practical " knowledge, which means the following of the
Path to God, by cutting off of all hindrances and getting rid of sin. I Again al-Ghazali writes : "
By contemplative knowledge we mean that the veil is raised and that the Divine Glory is
revealed so clearly that it cannot be doubted, and this would be possible to man, if the mirror
were not dimmed by rust and impurity due to the defilements of this world ; and by the
knowledge of the Way we mean knowledge of how to polish this mirror from the stains which
are a veil between God Most Glorious and the understanding of His attributes and His acts, and
this cleansing and purification is secured only by refrainirg from lust. In proportion as the heart
is polished and is turned Godwards, is the Divine Reality manifested therein. There is no way to
attain this except by self-discipline and knowledge and study."'
But so many of the elements in al-Ghaz.li's mystical teaching are to be found in the writings of
the Christian mystics of the Greek and even of the Roman Church that we can hardly doubt that
he had found inspiration either in Arabic translations of their works or in personal contacts with
Christian monks and others. The resemblance between al-GhazalI°s spiritual,experi ence and that
of St. Augustine has already -been: analysed,' but there is a considerable and interesting
resemblance also between their mystical teaching and their outlook on life, e.g., such a passage
in al-Ghazali as: " Beautiful forms are loved for their own sake ; the very perception of-Beauty is
a cause of delight and it is undeniable that it is loved for. its own sake. So also green things and
running water are loved. It is natural to delight in the sight of the celestial lights and in the
flowers and the birds, with their fair colours and varied forms and their perfectly proportioned
shapes, and the griefs and anxieties-Df, man are dispelled as he looks upon them," 4 shows the
sameappre ciation of the good and the beautiful as St. Augustine's joy in
1 Ihya, I,PP. 4, 46, 48. Fatihat at-'UIGm, p. 4t

Ihya, I, pp. 18, rg. Cf. Fatihat al-'Utdm,p 41.
a H. Frick, Ghaadlt's Selbsibiographie: ein Vergicicb mil Aupe.stins Konfessionem. ' Ihya,
IV, p. ag6.
i
(i
the grace of the heavens,-the earth and the sea, the brightness
of light in the sun, moon and stars, the shade of the woods, .the colours and fragrance of #owers,
the kinds of birds and their' varied hues and songs, the diverse forms of beasts and fishes,
whereof the least are the rarest (for the fabric of the bee or pismire is more admirable than that of
the whale). All these are " a shadowy foretaste of the glories to be revealed," 1 al-Ghazali's
interest in the bee and other small creatures, as being especially illustrative of the wondeit of
God's creation, has already been mentioned.'
There is little -doubt that aI-Ghazali, being educated and studying where he did, must have-been
in touch also with the mysticism of the Syriac-speaking .Christians of the Middle East. When he
speaks of the Tleart as a Divine thing, irradiated by the Divine Light; he adds : " Then, when the
beauty of the heart is unveiled, it may be that its owner turns towards the heart and so" of its
transcendent beauty that which dazzles him." 31 This passage bears a close resemblance to the
words of Isaac of Nineveh, of the seventh century A.D. 4 " Grace makes manifest all the glory,
which God has hidden in the nature of the soul, showing the soul'this glory and making it glad
because of its own beauty .... it does not remember the body which hid its own beauties from its
sight. Then it sees heavenly beauties in itself, as the exact mirror which by its great purity shows
the beauty of faces." 5
al-Ghazaii's mystical teaching, therefore, certainly owes something to those of other faiths, both
pagan and Christian, of the West as well as the East, but it is developed on lines distinctively
Eastern and Islamic and there is no doubt that. his
chief sources are to be found in the writings of Muslim thinkers,

and above all in those of the Sufis. Like other orthodox Sufis,
he claimed the Qur'an ai i the sayings of the Prophet and his
' Do. Ciu. Doi, XXII, 24. Cf. also VII, 29, 30.
' Cf. pp. 68 ft above and also Kitib al-(Iikmat ff Makhlagdt A17ih, pp. 2, 63 52, 59.
Ihyd, III, p. +50. al-Munawf, -op. cii., fol. 1g8a. Cf. also Mizan al-'A mal, " We desire from
knowledge the soul's attainment of its perfection so that it may ascend thereby, rejoicing in what
it possesses of splendour and perfection
for ever." %,a414, ' Cf. my is Bar1y Mysticism. 97 ff. s Mystical Treatise, P. 349•
AL-GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING T23
successors in the Caliphate as the original authority for much of his teaching, but a great part of
his mystical doctrine is obviously based on the writings or reputed sayings of earlier Sufis,
among them Hasan al-Ba~ri (ob. 110 X728)1, Sufyan al-Thawri (ob. 161 1777) 2 and Ibrahim b.
Adham (ob. i6o /z77). Of the last al-Ghazali relates that he was one who was filled with yearning
love for his Lord and he told how one day he prayed : " 0 Lord, if Thou dost give to any of Thy
lovers a means of rest for his heart before he meets with Thee, then grant it unto me, for
disquietude lies heavy upon me." Then he dreamt that he stood in the Presence of God, Who said
to him-: " 0 Ibrahim, are you not ashamed to ask Me to give you rest for your heart before
meeting with Me ? Does anyone who loves with passionate longing find rest before meeting his
beloved ? " And Ibrahim replied : " 0 Lord, I was distracted by love to Thee and knew not what I
said ; therefore forgive me and teach me what to say." Then the Lord said to him : "Say: ' 0 my
God, make me satisfied with Thy decree and give me patience under the trials Thou lost send,
and grant unto me to give thanks for Thy grace, for this yearning love will find its satisfaction in
the life to come. a al-Ghazali was well acquainted also with the sayings of the woman mystic,
Rabi'a al-'Adawiyya of Basra (ob. 185 /8oi) 4 and Abu Sulayman al-Darani (ob. 215 /85o).5 al-
Ghazali himself, in his autobiography, mentions expressly that he had consulted the works of
Harith al-Muhasibi, Abu Talib al-Makki, and the fragments handed down of the teaching of Abu
Yazid al-Bistami, Junayd and Shibli.'
Harith b. Asad al-Muhasibi (ob. 2431857) was one of the most important, and probably the
earliest, of al-Ghazali's written sources. Upon al-Muhasibi's Ri'aya It Hugitq Allah,' his
I Cf. my Early Mystic of Baghdad, pp. 68, 69 Ihyi, 1, p. 61, III, p. 186, III, pp.183, 214, 320. IV,
PP.254, 293• hfukdshafata!-QuIab, p. 137. Muniwf,
op. cit.. fol. ,96a. z8 28
1 Early Mystic, p. 72. Cf. Ihyd, I, PP. 34, 61. IV, pp. 3. 5.
z Ihya, IV, pp. 277, 287. Cf. also my Eariv Mystic, p. 73 and Ihyi, I, p. 61.
III, p. 182. IV, p. 285. P,fukishafat al- Qullib, p. 137.
a Cf. may Rabi'a the Mystic, and Ihya III, p. 89. IV, pp. 28, 42, 44, 269, 291,
344 (margin), 358 (margin). Minhal al'Absdtn, p. So.
6 Cf. Sharhnl, al-fabagd6 al-Iiubra, 1, p. 68. Ihya, III; PP- '73, 182. IV,
PP. 254, 299. .11uhashafat al-Qulub, p. 138.
' al-dlungidh, p. 20.
7 )iy edition of this has been recently published by the Gibb Trustees.
Iz4 -AL-GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING
Wasayd (Nasd'ih), the Kitdb Ihkam al-Tawba, the Muhdsabat al-Nufus' and his Fasl fs'l-
Mahabba, 2 al-Ghazali draws very largely for both the main principles of his teaching and his
illustrations. His psychology is derived, to a great extent, from al-Muhasibi, whose view of the
Reason as an innate disposition he approves, while stating that it is a quality which distinguishes
man from the brutes. " By the Reason, I mean the innate disposition," al-Ghazali writes,
repeating al-Muhasibi's words, " the original light by which man comprehends the real meaning
of things . . . a clear intellect and penetrating understanding must be an original disposition, and
if a man is not born with this, it cannot be acquired. But if the root of it is in you, it can be
strengthened by close application to study." The human intelligence he compares to a mirror,
which differs from other bodies in possessing the power to reproduce forms and colours, by
means of the polish upon it, as the eye differs from, e.g., the forehead, in its capacity for vision,
and the relation of this innate disposition to knowledge is like the relation of the eye to vision,
and the relation of the Qur'an and the Shay to this natural capacity, in leading it to the revelation
of knowledge, is like the relation of the sun to sight. 3 al-Ghazalf's theory of knowledge is also
based on that of al-Muhasibi, and he makes the same distinction between the knowledge which
can be acquired by study ('ilm) and the intuitive understanding (ma'rifa) which is given, not
acquired, by means of which man can learn to know himself and his Lord and the true worth of
this world in comparison with the world to come. 4
al-Ghazali's teaching on Prayer also owes much to the earlier writer, s and the same is true of his
teaching on Asceticism and the Purgative life, in which the soul is seeking purification from the
grosser vices,6 and the acquirement of the virtues. In dealing with Generosity (cf. P. 57 above)
he quotes a saying of
1 These three works are still unpublished.
= Included in Abu Nu'aym's Hilyat al-Awliyd.
• IhYa, 1, P. 75, III, p. 353. Kimiya al-Sa'dda, pp. io ff. Cf. al-Muhasibi,
Ma'iyyat al-'Aql we ma'nahu, fols. 104 b,
4 M6ya, III, p. 353. Cf. al-Muhasibi, Kitab al-'Ilni, Chap. VIII. Add&
al-Nufus, fols, 84 a ff,
• Cf. Ihya, I, pp. 129 ff. and al-Muhasibi Wasayis (Nasa'ih), fols. lib ff.
17b ff.' Cf. Ihy4, III, passim. and al-Muhlisibi, Ri'afa, passim.
AL-GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING X25
al-Muhasibi to the effect that generosity in regard to religion (i.e., magnanimity) means that you
should be prepared to pour out your very life-blood, spending yourself freely for the sake of God
Most Glorious, and that you should be willing to make even the supreme sacrifice of life itself
for His sake, willingly, not reluctantly, not seeking therewith any reward, either in this life or the
life to come, and even though you are conscious of the reward, yet your predominating thought is
of the beauty and perfection of the generosity which abandons the choice to God, so that it may
be your Lord Who chooses for you what you are not able to choose for yourself.' al-Ghazali also
quotes alMuhasibi's condemnation of wealth and his praise of godly poverty as the ideal for the
traveller on the road to God. 2 He accepts al-Muhasibi's view of the right meaning of trust in
God, which does not mean that a man is to refuse to possess anything, or to take means to earn a
livelihood. 3 al-Ghazali, too, claims al-Muhasibi, for all his asceticism and rigid piety and his
devotion to religion, as a supporter of his own view that listening to music and singing is
permissible for the devout seeker after God. 4 In his teaching on the Unitive life al-Ghazali also
depends to a certain extent upon his predecessor. 6 al-Ghazali's indebtedness to al-Muhasibi is,
in fact, much greater than he himself acknowledges.
al-Ghazali has made use also of the sayings of the famous mystic Abu Yazid al-Bistami (ob. 261
/875), including his words " The learned man is not he who studies from a book, for in that case,
since the Prophet did not study, he would be ignorantbut he who takes his knowledge from his
Lord, when He desires it, without study or instruction : this is the man learned in spiritual
things." a It is perhaps upon this that al-Ghazali bases his own conclusions that the Sufis care
chiefly for the
knowledge bestowed on them by God (al-'alum al-ilhii niyya),
1 Ihya, III, p. 226. = Ibid., p. 273.
2 Ikya, III, p. z29. a 1hya, II, p. 238.
s Cf. 1hya, IV, p. 2911 derived from al-\Iuhasibis Fasl fi'1-11ahabba (Halyaf
al-Awli),4), fols. 240 ff.
e For a more detailed consideration of the subject cf. my article The Fore
runner of al-Ghazblf. J.R.A.S. January, 1936.
' Cf. Studies in Early Mysticism, pp. 236 ff. L. Massignon, Trxtes Inldits,
p. 27 ft.
5 al-lfunawi, od. cit., fol. ig6a,
not that acquired by study, and therefore they do not urge men to study human knowledge or to
peruse what human writers have written, or to discuss statements and arguments, but instead they
claim that the Way (which leads to God) is the choice of effort and the elimination of vices and
the cutting off of all ties and the setting of the concern entirely upon God, and when that comes
to pass, it is God Who takes possession of His servant's heart and is responsible for enlightening
him with the light of knowledge from Himself. I
On the same subject, al-Ghazali quotes the words of Abu Yazid to the theologians of his day : "
You have taken your knowledge from these learned in outward ceremonial, a dead thing from the
dead, but we have taken our knowledge from the Living One, Who does not die."' al-Ghazali's
admiration for al-Bistami and his disinterested service of his Lord is shown in his account of how
Ahmad b. Khadrawiya :saw his Lord in a dream, and He said to him : " All men seek Paradise
from Me except Abu Yazid, who seeks Me for Myself." Then he tells how Abu Yazid himself
saw his Lord in a dream and said : " 0 Lord, what is the way to Thee ? " and He answered :
"Abandon thyself and come unto Me." a al-Ghazali also gives a striking saying of Abu Yazid : "
If it were granted unto you to talk with God face to face as Moses did, and to be filled with the
Spirit, as Jesus was, and to enjoy the Divine friendship, like Abraham, yet should you seek what
is beyond that, for there is infinitely more to be given by Him, and if you rest content with that,
you are veiled thereby, and this is the test for such as these, and one who is like them, for they
are in the highest rank,"'
al-Ghazali had also made a study of the fragments available of the teaching of Abu'l-Qasim al-
Junayd of Baghdad (ob.
298 /854), who had studied under al-Muhasibi and become one of the most famous of Sufi
teachers, though he preferred to talk with a group of intimates, rather than to give formal
instruction to a large number. al-Ghazali states that he would not address more than ten present
at once, and the members of his circle never reached as many as twenty. s Hee also repeats
Junayd's
Ihya, II, p. 16. ° Ihyd, IV, p. 321.
' M. Ridd, op. ail., p. 15. 4 Ihyd, IV, p. 305. Ihyd, I, p. 32.
AL-GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING 127 words to the effect that the best and most
exalted of company is to sit with Reflection, in the sphere of the Unity, breathing the
zephyr of Gnosis and drinking the cup of Love from the ocean of attachment (waddd) and having
fair thoughts of God. Then lie added : " 0 what company, none more glorious, and what wine,
none more delicious : blessed is he who is sustained therewith I " I al-Ghazali relates how Junayd
said of his own experience of the Unitive Life : " I have been talking with God for thirty years
and people suppose that L have been talking with them : this becomes easy only to one absorbed
in the love of God, with an absorption which leaves no room for any other."' He quotes also
words of Junayd which he may have felt were applicable to his own experience : " The journey
from this world to the next (i.e., to give up worldly things for spiritual) is easy for the believer :
the journey from the creatures (i.e., separation from them and from dependence on them) to the
Creator is hard : the journey from the self to God is very hard, and to be able to abide in God is
harder still," and al-Ghazali adds that the greatest hindrances to the soul arise from mankind and
the love of position and the enjoyment of authority. 3 Among the sayings of Junayd on the love
of God al.Ghazali quotes his words : " The sign of love is constant activity and continual conflict
with sensual desire : the body (of the lover) becomes weary, but not the heart." 4
Another of al-Ghazali's sources was Shibli (ob. 334/945),
a
a disciple of Junayd and a well-known saint and Sufi, who preached his doctrines at Baghdad. al-
Ghazali quotes a certain number of his sayings, among them his reply when he was asked to
describe the gnostic and the lover and said : " The gnostic, if he speaks, is lost, and the lover, if
he is silent, is lost." s It is Shibli's lines also that al-Ghazali quotes on Love
Verily love to the All-Merciful has intoxicated me
Have you seen any lover who was not intoxicated ? "7
Mukashafat al-Qulab, p. 138.
• Ihya, 1I, p. 202.
• Ihyd, IV, p. 67.
• Ihyd, IV, p. 286. Cf. also lhyd, II I, PP• 57.73.182, 296. IV, PP• 48,67o292_
• Cf. I., liassignon, Textes InEdits, pp. 77 $. i• llakdshr+fat al-Quiub, p. z21. 10a, IV, p.
308.
Ihvd, IV, p. 30o. cf. p. log above.
Y
128 ' AL-GHAZALrS. MYSTICAL TEACHING
al-GhazAR made considerable use of the Qut al-Qulub of Abu
Ti ;lib al-Makkf (ob. 386/996), who taught in Mecca, Basra and
Baghdad, and especially of his teaching on knowledge, both
'ilm and ma'rifa, and the learned (al-'ulama). The truly learned,
says Abu Talib, are those who prefer the next world to this,
and God to themselves, and he adds the story of the Israelite
given also by al-Ghazali (cf. p.142 above), whose ideal of the truly
wise ('ulamd aldkhira) corresponds to that of Abu Talib.I
Again Abu- TAlib writes of the man wise in spiritual things
(al-'slim ai-rabbans), that one who knows and acts in accordance
with his knowledge, and teaches men what is good, as " he who
is called great in the Kingdom of Heaven." al-Ghazali repeats
the statement, adding that such a one is like the sun, which is
luminous in itself and gives light to others. 3
. Knowledge is compared, by both Abu Talib and al-Ghazali,
with a light which God "casts " into the heart. a Abu Talib distinguishes between outward
knowledge ('ilm al-zdhir) and inward knowledge ('ilm al-bdtin), the former concerned with this
world (al-mulk) and the latter with the world to come (al- nalakut), and the inner knowledge, he
holds, is as superior to the outward as the invisible world to the visible. al-Ghazali makes the
same distinction between the inward and the outward knowledge, the former being that of the
heart, which is concerned with the spiritual world and the latter that which is concerned with the
sensible world. By mulk he says he means the visible world perceived by the senses and by
malakul the invisible world which is perceived by the light of insight. The heart, the instrument
of inner knowledge, belongs to the world of malakut, and the taembers, the instruments of
outward knowledge, and their actions, belong to the world of mulk.' al-Ghazali owes something
also to Abu Talib's teaching on Contemplation (m.ushdhada) and the state of Certainty (yaqin),
which is really the Unitive life, and he follows .Abu Talib in accepting as the foundations of this
state of assured faith, repentance, patience, gratitude,
` Qiet al-Qulub, II, p. 1z. Cf. IHya, II, p. 213, I, P: 1I.

' Qat al-Qulub, II, p. 12. Ihyd, I, p, 49. Cf. Matt, V, 1g. ' Qut, I, p. 197. Munqidk, p. 5.
' QW, I, p. 200, 11, p. 32, III, p. 1o6. Ikvd, 1, p. 107. III, p. 311. 'IV,
p. 216, Mishkat al-Rnwdr, pp. 12z ff. Fatihat al-'1]11im, p. 40- Inala'
pp. 216 ff.
hope, fear, asceticism (zuhd), trust, satisfaction and love, that is, love of the Divine Beloved.'
al-Ghazali was also acquainted with the work of the historian of early Sufism, Abu 'Abd al-
Rahman al-Sulami of Nishapur
ob. 4101'021), whose Tafsir (Kitdb Haga'iq al-Tafsir), he menttions z and whose Tabagdl al-
Suftyya he may also have consulted, for the sayings of the Sufis.
al-Ghazali refers to the well-known writer on Sufism, Abu'lQasim al-Qushayri (ob. 465 /1074), a
disciple of al-Sulami, who taught at Baghdad and had been the teacher of one of al-Ghazali s
early instructors in Sufism (cf. p.17 above), so that al-Ghazali would certainly have been brought
into contact with Qushayri's writings, and he does, in fact, make considerable use of al-Risalat
al-Qushayriyya. This is notably the case in regard to his teaching on Music. al-Ghazali's
quotations from the older authorities, including al-Shafi'i, are found in Qushayri's chapter on the
subject, s and also some of his examples of the power of music to affect even the animals,
including the story of Raggi and the black slave (cf. p. 86 above).' Qushayri had already made
use of Junayd's remark that time, place and company should be taken into account in listening to
music and had divided listeners into different classes, of whom the highest were the gnostics.6
Qushayri, too, had quoted the saying of Abu Sulayman that " A beautiful sound does not bring
anything (fresh) into the heart, it only stirs up what is already in the heart." al-Ghazali also states
: "When the heart is moved (by music) what is manifested is only what it already contains as
from a vessel there drips only what is in it."' al-Ghazali seems to be indebted, to some extent, to
Qushayri, for his teaching on ecstasy (wajd).7
Qushayri compares the Divine revelation which comes to those who are waiting in expectation
for it, to flashes of light (lawd'ii), then rays of light (tawdli'), then the light shining in its full
splendour (lawi mi) and he quotes the lines
1 Qut, I, p. 200. III, P. 74. Ihya, I, PP. 48, 64,
• at-'Risalat al-Laduniyya, p. 23.
• Risala, p. 152. Cf. Ihya, II, p. 237.
• Risala, p. 153. Ikyd, II, p. 243.
• Risala, pp. 154 ff. Ihva, II, pp. 265, 269.
• Risala, p. 157. Ihyd, II, P. 237, 246.
• Risala, P. 34. Ikya, II, pp. 246, 257.
66, 107, IV, Passim.
1
r30 AL-GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING
" 0 lightning which flashes forth : from which horizon of the heavens
dost thou shine ?
First come the flashes, then the rays, then the full splendour like
a radiant light,
Manifest only to those who are veiled."
The rays of light, he says, are clearer than the flashes and do not
disappear so speedily, and the light in- its-splendour r"emains
longer still and is stronger and endures for a longer time. So
also al-Ghazali says that from behind the veil of the invisible
world God causes knowledge 'to shine in men's hearts, sometimes
like a dazzling flash of lightning, sometimes like a succession of
lights, sometimes, but rarely, remaining. I Many other examples
could be found showing the extent to which al-Ghazali has
availed himself of Qushayri's work and borrowed his illustrations.
al-Ghazali evidently made a close study of the Persian writer
Abu'l-Hasan al-Jullabi al-Hujwiri, who was contemporary with
Qushayri, and died a year or two later, probably between 465 /1074
and 469 /ro78. - Hujwiri travelled widely, visiting Damascus and
Teas in the course of his travels, and settled for a while in 'Iraq.
He--wrote- a number of mystical works, including the Kashf
al-Mahjub (The Unveiling of the Veiled) and this is the book of which al-Ghazali makes use.
Hujwiri divided the Way to God into three stages, and those who have reached these stages may
be characterised by wagt (or magam), hal, and tamkin. Hat, he says, is that " which descends
upon waqt and adorns it, as the spirit adorns the body." The one who is still in the stage of wagt
has need to advance to the stage of hal, for then he is no more subject to change and is made
steadfast. " The possessor of wagt may become forgetful, but the possessor of hal cannot
possibly be so." He who has attained to hal does not speak of his state, but his actions speak of
its reality. The world is sometimes a place of tribulation to the owner of wagt because he is
absent from his Beloved and distressed by his loss, but it makes no difference to the possessor of
hal whether he is subject to affliction br in a state of happiness, " for he is always in the place of
actual vision." Hat is an attribute of the object sought (murad), while waqt (or magam) is the
rank of the seeker (murid).
4 Risala, p. 40, Ibyd, III, p. 16.
AL-GHAZALT'S MYSTICAL TEACHING 131 1 amkin is the last of the stages, beyond which
and those to pass, because it is " repose within etWhich re retains the attributes attain to tamkin
are of two classes,
but the other of the self, i.e., still-has some individual personality,
has no personal attributes, for one of this class is ccoompletely absorbed in the contemplation of
God (shahid a1-Hag
al-Ghazali, in his Raw aet Th aN he for LGarden of the Seekers)
ights), makes use of
and his Mishkat al-Anw (
mptoed b HujwM- He these conceptions and the terms e y by
also divides those who traveller,
follow the Sufi Path into threeeth classes, the seeker (murid), who is the possessor of wagl, who
has attained, who is who is the owner of for lhe has p d beyond the possibility of
possessed of tamkm, s in his Mishkat
of changes and stations and states. Again, al-Anwar, al-Ghazali divides those who attain into two
classes, but those with whom things seen obliterated and annihilat d,
soul and those who away passed from self.'
Hforuthjwirieywiri writes es of knowing God by means of His attributes of
Beauty (jamal) and Majesty (jalal) and says that those who know Him through His beauty are
always longing for vision, and longing is the result of love, while those hwrites:
know H Men Goo
His Majesty. are filled with awe. Again ga
manifests His glory to a man's heart, so that H s Majesty r fees, he feels awe, but when God's
Beauty p intimacy-" There is a difference." he adds,
" between one who is love and one h is n
burned by His Majesty in thlight contemplation." ò al1Gha all the ated by His Beauty also notes
that the realisation of the Majesty of God causes awe, m
while the conteplation of His Beauty produces love and longing, and he develops the theme in
much the same way as his predecessor.
Much, too, of' al-Ghazali's teaching on Audition and Music seems to be based on what Hujwiri
had already srt forth.
I Kashf at-Mahjob, pp. 169 a'Cf. also Chapters X, XT, vTT txlnw,
1 Rawdat at-Tdlibht, p.
• op. sit., p- 144. 88, 376 lt. t38 below
• Kashf at-.4fahjsi S 9I. Rawdat at-TdtiMln, p- 163. p 4 Ihya, I1', pp. '7,
i
Hujwiri also gives a story of Ibrahim I{hawwas and a slave
whose beautiful voice so affected the camels of which he had
charge that they hastened their pace to the point of exhaustion
and so died, a story identical in its details with that related by
al-Ghazali of Abu Bakr al-Dinawari.I al-Hujwiri also gives the
legend of David in much greater detail, stating that God made
him His vicegerent and gave him a 'voice so melodious that the
wild beasts and the birds came from mountain and plain to hear
him, and the streams ceased to flow and the birds fell from the
air to the ground. For the space of a month the people who had
gathered round him in the desert ate no food, while the children
neither wept nor asked for milk. Many died from the ecstasy
which resulted from listening to his voice, the number of the dead
at one time amounting to seven hundred maidens and twelve
thousand old men. Then God, wishing to distinguish between
those who merely listened to the voice and those who listened to the spiritual significance of
what was sung, allowed Iblis to do what he would. Iblis constructed a mandoline and a flute and
established himself opposite David, as he sang, and the audience were straight way divided into
the blest and the damned : the latter listened to the music of Iblis, but the former to the voice of
David, being conscious of nothing else, for they saw God alone. al-Ghazali gives this legend, but
in a much attenuated form. 2
Many Sufi terms are used by al-Ghazali in the same sense as Hujwiri and often interpreted by
him in a way which leaves no doubt that he owes the interpretation also to the earlier writer.
From all these varied sources, then, al-Ghazali derived ideas and terminology and inspiration,
threads which were woven into the texture of his own developed doctrine of mysticism, which,
while based upon the foundations laid by the mystics of other times and spheres, yet owed much
of its outward form to his own outstanding genius, and in its essence, owed still more to his own
personal experience of treading the mystic Path which had led him to God.
1 Xashf, p. 400. Ihyd, II, p. 243. Cf. p. 85 above.
Hash), p. 402. 144, II, p. 239.
CHAPTER IX
The Nature of the Godhead. The human soul and its origin.
God and the soul of rnan.
al-Ghazali's mystical teaching, like that of other mystics. is based on his doctrine of the nature of
the Godhead, his conception of the human soul, and his view of the relationship between God
and the soul, and its implications.
In a passage in the Maya, which is justly famed, he sets forth in full his doctrine of the Godhead :
" Praise be to God, the Creator and restorer of all things, Who does what He wills, Lord of the
Glorious Throne, the Almighty, Who guides His chosen servants into the right. path and the
straight road, Who blesses those who acknowledge His Unity, by preserving their faith from the
darkness of doubt ... to them •hath He made known that in His Essence He is One, without
partner. Unique, there is none like unto Him, Eternal, none resembling Him, set apart and having
no equal. He is One, the Ancient of Days, without prior, Eternal, having no beginning,
Everlasting; having no end, continuing for evermore. He abides, never ceasing to be : He remains
and shall never be cut off; He has never ceased, nor shall cease, to be described by glorious
attributes. He is the First and the Last, the Transcendent and Immanent, Whose wisdom
extendeth over all.
He is neither body nor substance nor accident. He cannot be likened to anything that exists nor is
anything like unto Him, nor is He contained by the earth or the heavens, for He is exalted far
above the earth and the dust thereof. Yet is He near unto everything that exists, " nearer to His
servant than the jugular vein." 1 He oversees all things : He is exalted beyond the limitations of
space and time, for He was before time and space were created and He is, now, as He always
was. The fact of His existence is apprehended by men's reason and He will be seen as He is by
that gift of spiritual vision, which He will grant
1 Sara, L, 15.
133
J 34 AL-GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING
unto the righteous, in the Abode of Eternity, when their beatitude shall be made perfect by the
Vision of His Gracious Countenance. He is the Exalted, Almighty, Puissant, Supreme, Who
slumbereth ;lot nor sleepeth, neither mortality nor death have dominion over Him. His is the
power and the kingdom and the glory and the majesty, and to Him belongs creation and the rule
over what He has created : He alone is the Giver of Life.
He is Omniscient, for His Knowledge encompasseth all things, from the deepest depths of the
earth to the highest heights of the heavens ; not the smallest atom in the earth or the heavens but
is known unto Him, yea, He is aware of how the ants creep upon the hard rock in the darkness of
the night ; He perceives the movement of the mote in the ether ; He beholds the thoughts which
pass through the minds of men, and the range of their fancies, and the secrets of their hearts, by
His knowledge, which was from aforetime.
" All that is other than Him, men and genii, angels and Satan, the heavens and the earth, animals,
plants, inorganic matter, substance and accident, what is intelligible and what is sensible, all
were created by His power out of non-existence. He. brought them into being, when as yet they
had no being, for from eternity He alone existed and there was no other with Him. 1
" But then He chose to create all things that His power might be manifested forth for the
establishment of what He had willed aforetime and the fulfilment of His eternal Word. It was not
that He had need of them or that they fulfilled anything lacking (to Him), but for the showing-
forth of His glory in the work of creation and of bringing into existence by the Word of His
power, not on account of any obligation on His part ...but out of His unfailing grace and living-
kindness. But since service is due to Him from His creatures, for He has declared that to be
necessary by the tongues of His prophets, He has not left it
' CI. the Persian mystic Jami :

In solitude, where Being signless dwelt, And all the Universe still dormant lay, Concealed in
selflessness, One Being was Exempt from " I," or" Thou "-ness and apart From all duality :
Beauty Supreme, Unmanifest, except unto Itself."
Yasuf a Zulaykha (trap, E. G. Browne.)
simply to their understanding, but has sent His messengers and has witnessed to their veracity by
manifest miracles .. . and men ought to accept their word in what they relate."'
Every creature, al-Ghazali argues, has need of a Creator, to bring it into existence and to keep it
alive and to maintain its endowments and to control its, actions-by its very need of Him, the
creature bears witness to its Creator. I This world bears witness to its Maker and His power,
because there is evidence of judgment and organisation in its creation, for, says al-Ghazali,
anyone who sees a robe of brocade, beautifully woven and fashioned appropriately to the
embroidery and the trimming, and then imagines that it is the work of something inanimate,
without skill or capacity, must be devoid of reasoning power,
and a fool.3
In passage after passage, al-Ghazali insists on the unity of Being, that everything in existence
apart from God is His handiwork, His creation, and as such manifests forth His wisdom and His
might and His glory and His greatness. "There is no particle in the heavens or the earth," he
declares, " which does not bear some kind of witness to the Unicity of God, which is their
acknowledgment of the Unity. They witness, in their different spheres, to the holiness of their
Maker, by their praise of Him, but men do not understand their praises, for they do not pass
beyond the narrow limits of hearing with the outward ear to the wide scope of hearing with the
inward ear, nor beyond the stuttering accents of the speaker's tongue to the eloquence of the
tongue of the spiritual state. If every weakling (among human beings) were able to do this,
Solomon would not be alone in his ability to understand the speech of the birds, nor Moses in
being able to hear the very Voice of God." 4
One of al-Ghazali's books is expressly devoted to showing how the Eternal Wisdom has been
manifested in the wonders of the Divine creation. " If you reflect upon this world," he says, " you
will find it to be like a house, well-built, within which has been prepared all that is necessary :
for roof, the heavens have been raised above it, and the earth has been spread out as
' Ihyrl. 1, PP- 79 ff.
Ibid., p. oz.
' Ibid., p. 96.
Ihya, IV, p. 371, II, p. 219.
z36 AL-GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING
a carpet for it. The stars are ranged in their order to serve it
as lamps, and material things are laid up within it as provisions.
All that is prepared, ready to serve its purpose, and man is like
the owner of the house, to whom has been given all that is in it, prepared for his needs, sent for
his benefit. The heavens have been created of the colour which is the most vivid suited for the
eyes of men, and fitted to strengthen them: had the heavens consisted of sunbeams or pure light,
men could not have borne to look upon them without suffering injury. Now kings paint pictures
upon the ceilings of their .dwellings and decorate them, in order that the sight of them may give
pleasure and enjoyment, but those who look at them repeatedly grow weary of the sight and
cease to enjoy them. Not so with the heavens and their adornment, for kings and lesser mortals,
when vexed by annoyances, take refuge in enjoying the contemplation of the sky and its great
expanse. Indeed, wise men say that you will be given peace and happiness in your home in
proportion to what you have of heaven in it." al-Ghazali quotes also the statement that looking
upon the vault of heaven brings ten benefits, it dispels anxiety, it diminishes Satanic suggestions,
removes imaginary fears, reminds us of God, increases the heart's reverence for Him, banishes
evil thoughts, prevents melancholy, consoles the one who yearns for re-union with the absent,
brings joy to lovers, and is the direction towards which look all who pray'
The sun, too, is a witness to the wisdom and lovingkindness of the Creator, for how could men
enjoy life, asks al-Ghazali, if they were to lose its light and the benefits it brings ? But for the
brilliant light which it gives, men's eyes would be of no service to them, for they could not
distinguish between different colours. What wisdom, too, is shown forth in its setting as well as
in its rising, since thereby men and beasts find rest and relief from continuous heat. I
I al-Hikmat ff Makhlugat Allah, pp. 2, 3. Cf. Psalm XIX, i, "The
heavens declare the glory of God and the firmament sheweth His handiwork and the words of a
modern writer : " There are star-lit nights which ... sober the mind with a sudden sense of the
march of eternal truth," and he adds " Perhaps it is one of our simple duties to walk abroad at
night, when the world is hushed." Ernest Barker, The Spectator, November 25th, 1938.
11 al-.Hikmat ff Mahhlugat Allah, pp. 3, 4.
Again al-Ghazali considers the benefit resulting . from the succession of the four seasons. In the
winter, he points out, the heat " returns " into the trees and plants and there produces in them the
substance which will later develop into their fruits. The air in winter becomes laden with
moisture and thence come clouds and the rain, which. is good for the brute-creation and for all
the works of Nature. In the Spring Nature awakes once more and, by God's grace, the plants
reappear, and the trees break into blossom, while summer and autumn bring the ripening of the
fruits of the earth.
Within the sea are to be found the likenesses of what is in the earth and for these, too, the Creator
has made provision for all their needs. " Behold," says al-Ghazali, " how God created the round
pearl in its shell beneath the water and fixed the coral on the side of the rocks within the sea."
Strange, indeed, that any can be heedless of the grace of God as shown forth in all this, whether
considered as a whole or in detail.1
al-Ghazali points also to the wonders of God's creation as exemplified in the birds-with tail
created to serve as a rudder to keep the bird on its course-in fish and reptile, who have little
power to save themselves from danger, but are equipped with hard shells as a protection-in
animals created with the instinct to sham death in order to avoid capture, or with the power to
adapt their colour to their environment, like the chameleon-in insects endowed with the foresight
to store their food like the ant, or, like the bee, to take nectar from the flowers and transform it
into honey, as nourishment for themselves and a remedy for man, and the gnat, so minute, yet so
perfectly fashioned that all the inhabitants of the universe, celestial and terrestrial, could not have
conceived of it and cannot penetrate the mysteries of its being. All these show the wisdom of the
Creator manifested in His handiwork and His care for the needs of His creatures.2
It is quite clear, therefore, to al-Ghazali that man has only to look around him to realise that the
existence and attributes of God are shown forth in His universe. " All that we behold and
• al-Hikmat ft Makhlugai Allah, pp. 5, 12, 13.
• Ibid., PP. 36 ff. Ihya, IV, PP. 376 ff.
perceive by our senses, outward and inward," he writes, " bears
irrefutable witness to the existence of God and His power and
His knowledge and the rest of his attributes, the stone and the
clod, plant and tree and living creatures, earth and star, land
and sea, fire and air, substance and accident. Indeed, we ourselves are the chief witness to Him-
but just as the bat sees only at night, when the light is veiled by the darkness and cannot therefore
see in the daytime because of the weakness of its sight, which is dazzled by the full light of the
sun, so also the human mind is too weak to behold the full glory of the Divine Majesty." t
al-Ghazali gives a mystical interpretation of certain of the Beautiful Names of God (the Divine
Attributes) which might seem to be contradictory, since He is called the First and the Last, the
Manifest and the Hidden. He is the First, he says, in relation to existent things, since all have
emanated from Him in their order, one after another, and He is the Last in relation to the course
of those who are journeying towards Him, for they continue to advance from stage to stage until
at last they reach their goal, that Presence, which is the end of the journey, so that He is the Last
in respect of contemplation and the First in respect of existence. He is Hidden in relation to those
who dwell in the phenomenal world, who seek to apprehend Him by means of the senses only,
Manifest in relation to that one who seeks Him within a heart enlightened by that inner vision
which penetrates the Invisible World .2
To al-Ghazali, therefore, God is Transcendent and Immanent, the Creator and the Sole Cause of
all existence, the Prime Mover of all things, and the Eternal Wisdom. He is also Supreme
Beauty, for just as beauty in the works of men, the poet's verses, the painter's picture, the author's
writings, the architect's buildings, indicate the inner beauty of their genius and conceptions-for
only from beauty can beauty come forth-so also the beauty and perfection of the works of God
show that He is Perfect Beauty, the most radiant and most glorious Existence that can be
conceived, and indeed, possessed of a Beauty that is
I Ihyd, IV, p. 275.
3 Ayd, IV, pp. 21;, 218.
beyond man's conception. I al-Ghazali writes of the love of the servant which is aroused by the
Beauty and the Majesty of God : " The joy of contemplating the Divine Beauty," he says " is that
to which the Apostle referred when he declared that God had said : ' I have prepared for My
righteous servants what eye hath not seen nor ear heard nor bath entered into the heart of man'."
2 The realisation of the Divine Majesty brings awe to the servant's heart, but the contemplation
of the Divine Beauty fills his heart with love and that servant is always seeking to penetrate the
veil of the invisible and to look upon the All-Beautiful. The meaning of fellowship with God is
the heart's joy and delight in the contemplation of His Beauty. 3 It is th- Eternal Beauty, of
limitless perfection, seen only with the spiritual eye, more satisfying than all the beauties of this
world, which are but a manifestation of that Absolute Beauty.
al-Ghazali also conceives of God as Light, which is the source, as it is the condition, of life and
action, of beauty and joy, which he associated, as already noted, with wisdom and knowledge. s
Since, in the physical sphere, light is the embodiment of glory and splendour, and in the
intellectual and ethical sphere, represents purity and holiness and truth, it is fitting, in his eyes, to
think of God as Light. Moreover, Light, by its very nature, must manifest itself in enlightenment,
and so it is, too, with the Divine Light. "All existent things in this world," al-Ghazali declares, "
result from the power of God and are enlightened by the Light of His Essence, for in truth there
is no darkness more intense than non-existence and no light' more evident than existence and all
things are a ray of the Essential Light of God, the High, the Holy, since all things are maintained
in existence by the Self-Subsistent, just as the light of material bodies is
I Ihyn, IV, pp- 259 ff
3 Ibid., p. -267
3 Ihya, IV, pp. 267, 291.
Ila'n, IV, p. 300. llishk4t al-aawdr, p. 144. Cf. lami,
" Each. speck of matter did Tic constitute
r1 mirror, causing each one to reflect The beauty of His visage .. .
His Beauty everywhere doth shew itself
And through the forms of earthly beauties shines Obscured as through a veil."
1 isisf u 2ufa,kha (tr. F. G. Browne)
3 Cf. p. rod above.
maintained by the light of the sun, which is radiant in itself. \Whenever part of the sun is
eclipsed, it is customary to place a bowl of water in which the sun is reflected, so that it may be
possible to look at it, the water being the means which enables the eyes to bear 'the sight of a
small part of the sun's light. So also the works of God are a means by which we can contem-.
plate the Attributes of Him Who made them, and we are not dazzled by that Essential Splendour,
when we see it at a distance in His works. I The one Real Light (al-Nilr al-Hagq), therefore, is
God Himself, for all other lights are but partial rays or reflections of His light, imperfect,
transitory and incomplete, nonexistent apart from Him. "The term' light' applied to any but Him
is merely metaphorical, without real meaning-God is the highest and ultimate Light. . . . He alone
is the True, the Real Light and apart from Him there is no light at all." 2 The lesser lights,
heavenly and earthly, which are derived from Him, are of different grades, for which an analogy
can be found in the phenomenal world, by one who perceives the moonlight entering through the
window of the house, and falling upon a mirror fixed upon a wall, from which the light is
reflected upon the opposite wall and thence reflected upon the floor, so that the floor iF
illuminated by it. It is evident that the light upon the floor comes from that upon the wall, and the
light upon the wall from that in the mirror and the light in the mirror from the moonlight and the
light of the moon from the light of the sun, for it is the sun's light which shines upon the moon.
So also the lights of the heavens and the earth rise in gradation, but not in an endless series, for
they ascend to the First Source, \Vho is Light in, and through, Himself, for no light comes upon
Him from anything else, and from Him all lights receive their light in their different grades. "
The term ' light,' therefore," al-Ghazali concludes : " can worthily be applied only to ultimate
Light, above Whom is no light and from Whom light descends upon all else,- 3
We have seen that al-Ghazali compares non-existence with
1 Ihyd, IV, p. 370.

' blishkdt al-Anwar, pp. 10o ff.
Ibfd., pp. fro ff. Cf. p. io8 above.
darkness and existence with Light. Existence can be divided into that which is self-existent and
that which derives its existence from another : this latter only borrows its existence, it cannot
exist by itself, and this is not real existence at all. So, therefore, if the One Real Light is God, He,
and He alone, is Real Being. 1 " The real meaning of Deity," al-Ghazali writes, " is Unity in
perfection and Unicity in existence in the way of absolute sovereignty, and He Who is Unique in
existence is God, since there is none other co-existent with Him, apart from Him, for what is
other,than Him proceeds from His power, it has no subsistence in itself, but subsists through
Him." Again he writes : The world invisible includes mysteries hidden from the vision of the
eyes, which are fitted only to perceive what is visible, and the sum total of the visible and
invisible worlds considered as a whole is called the Divine Presence (Hadrai al-Rubicbiyya)
which encompasses all existent things, since there is nothing existent save God and His works'
and His kingdom and His servants, who are His handiwork." 2
God, to al-Ghazali, then, is the First Cause, the Final Source, the Eternal Wisdom, Beauty
Supreme, Unclouded Light, the
.One Ultimate Reality. 3
Ìn his teaching on the human' soul and its relation to God, al-Ghazali maintains, like other
mystics, that it was pre-existent, before its attachment to a material body, that it has something of
the Divine within it, and is immortal. He gives it different names-soul, spirit,. heart-and points
out that by the philisophers it was called " the rational soul " (al-nafs al-ndlnafs in the Qur'an it is
called " the tranquillised soul " (al-nafs al-mutnta'inna) and " the spirit which is of the air of God
" (al-rich min amr rabbi), a by the Sufis the "spirit" and the
r Mishkdt p. 113.
1 al-Munawl, op. cit., fol. 197 b. Ihyd,, III, p. 13.
2 Cf. a modern writer: " I mean the 'living God,' the might, the mind, the beauty, the will, the
goodness in and throagh all things and all persons and at the heart of the world : I mean that
which constitutes Unity : I mean that which comprehends into itself and is the Source of all
precious values, being greater and. not less for having attributes. . . . We do better to call this
innermost Reality by lovely names,. inasmuch as we surmise that all splendid thoughts come
from its prompting. . . We call it' Life and Light and Love we call it Eternal and the Father of our
spirits." C. F. Dale, The Hibbcrl Journal, April, 1914.
4 Suras LXXXIX, 27- XVII, 87.
" heart " but all mean the same things, which is the real essence of man (hagiga1 al-Adami), that
which differentiates him from the lower creation.' " The glory of man and his excellence,
whereby he surpasses all other creatures in being receptive of the knowledge of God Most
Glorious, which is this world is his adornment and his perfection and his excellence, and in the
world to come is his equipment and his treasure, is his heart, for by it alone can he receive
knowledge. For the heart is that which knows God, which approaches unto Him, which works for
God and strives after Him, that to which revelation is made of the things of God." 2
The human soul, al-Ghazali teaches, is possessed of five faculties or " spirits " (arwdh) : the
Sensory faculty, which receives information conveyed by the senses : the Imagination, which
records this information ; the Intelligence (al-ruh al-'agli) which apprehends what is beyond the
capacity of the senses and the imagination ; the Reasoning power (al-rash alikri) which, from the
data of pure reason, deduces fresh knowledge, and lastly the Divine prophetic spirit, which
belongs to the prophets and the saints, by means of which the soul receives the revelation of the
Invisible and attains to a knowledge of God Himself. 2
The tradition states that " he who knows himself knows his Lord," and al-Ghazali does not
hesitate to draw the conclusion that the soul is itself Divine in its origin ; it knows God, because
it is godlike. The spirit of man is " of the amr of God " and amr has a deeper meaning than that of
" command " ; it is rather the Divine Spirit. 4 There are two worlds, says al-Ghazali, the world of
creation (khalq) and 'the world of amr and both belong to God. All that is material belongs to the
phenomenal world of created things and is subject to modality and dimension, and sensible
things have, no real existence, but all that is free from modality and dimension, all that has real
existence, belongs to the spiritual world, the world of amr and this is the sphere of the human
soul. It, like all else belonging to that world,
• al-Risdlal al-Laduniyya, pp. 26 ff. Ma'arij al-Quds, p. i i.
• Ihyk, III, p. 2. Kimiya at-Sa'nda,, p. 6.
• Aflshkal al-Anwar, pp. 131, 132.
is abiding, eternal, self-subsistent, incorruptible. I The secret self, man's inward' part (sirr al-
galb) al-Ghazali states elsewhere, is a Divine thing, a ray from the Light of God, a spark from the
Eternal Flame, and within it, and to it, is revealed the Ultimate Reality, the image of the Whole,
so that it, too, is filled with the Divine Light and manifests it forth. 2 Again he speaks of the
human soul as Divine in origin (min al umur al-Alihiyya), more glorious and exalted than vile
bodies. 3 The body is a type of the lower world and the spirit is a type of the higher world. The
rational soul is like a governor who organises and controls and rules and issues commands and
prohibitions and does what he wills in effacing and confirming it is the vicegerent of God in the
sphere of the body and the Word of God in relation to the gross outward form. It is the Divine
bridge stretched between the brutes who are unmixed evil and the angels who are unmixed good.
As it descended from the Heavens so it will re-ascend thither and at the last pass away into the
Divine Majesty.'
The human soul is enabled to see and perceive Divine -Reifrty by means of a spiritual sense
called intuition, which goes beyond reason. Personality, al-Ghazali holds, includes the outward
form and the inward character or self since man is composed of a body which perceives by the
vision of the eyes, and of spirit and soul which perceives by the insight : both have an appear-
ance and a form, either foul or fair, and the soul which perceives by means of the insight is of
greater value than the body which perceives by means of the eyes. s " Certain of the Sufis
maintain," writes al-Ghazali, " that the heart possesses an organ of sight like the body, and
outward things are seen with the outward eye and inward realities with the eye of the mind. The
Apostle said : " Every servant has two eyes in his heart," and they are eyes by which he perceives
the Invisible, and when God wishes well to one of His servants He opens the eyes of his heart, so
that he may see what is hidden from his outward
i al-Risalat al-Laduniyya, p. 29. Ihya, 11. P. 200. III, pp. 326 ff. Kil4b
al-Arba'in, p. 53. Cf. al-Madnun al-. aghfr, PP. 4, 9.
al-Dfunawi, op. cit., fol. ig8a. Ihya, III, p. 350. s .ilfzan al-'Anal, p. 18.
al-Ma'arif al-'Agliyya, fol. 9b, al-Madnan al-Saghir, p. 9. 1 Ihya,-III, p. 46.
IF
sight." The spiritually-minded (arbab al-qulub) see with the inward eye more clearly than with
the outward eyes, for the latter may be at fault, seeing what is far-off as near and the large as
small, but the spiritual insight cannot be at fault. Each of these eyes,. the outward and the inner
has a sun and a light, whereby its vision is perfected, one of these lights is external, belonging to
the material world, to wit, the sun, and the other
to nl 3...7. .,
int rr al, belonging to the spiritual world, and it is the Word
of God. I The veil of man's lusts and his worldly pre-occupations
prevent him from seeing anything of the unseen Divine world,
so long as the veil is not withdrawn from the eye of his.heart,
but when it is withdrawn, as in the case of God's elect, then
undoubtedly man can look upon that Divine world and contem
plate its wonders. 2
There is, too, an " inward hearing." What is heard with the
" outward hearing " is only sound and man shares that faculty.
with the rest of the animals, but by the "inward hearing"
(al-sama` al-bdtin) he can hear and comprehend the spiritual
meaning which lies beyond outward speech. To the man whose
spiritual hearing is dulled, the song of the birds, the noise of
the waves and the sighing of the wind, are mere sounds, but to that one whose spiritual hearing is
alert, they are all bearing witness to the Unicity of God and praising Him with eloquent tongue. 3
This inward perception, which is intuition (al-basirat. al-batina) finds its satisfaction in what is
invisible; inaudible, to the outward senses-in the things which are not temporal, but eternal.4 The
heart, therefore, has two gates, one opening outwards, which is that of. the senses, and one
opening inwards, towards the Divine world, which is within the heart, and that is the gate
whereby it receives inspiration and revelation.6
Like other mystics, both.Christian and Sufi, al-Ghazali compares the human heart or soul, to a
mirror. The human soul, he says,
i al-Ris4lat al-Laduniyya, p. 30. 1hya, IV, P. 26. Mishhat al-4"M-4r, p. roe. Cf. a present-day
writer on mysticism : " What we need to acquire is the seeing eye that sees through the visible
and temporal, in clairvoyant fashion, and discovers the eternal and spiritual here and now
revealed in the midst of time and. things. R. Jones, New Studies in Mystical Religion, p. 86.
' Iliyd, IV, P. 437.
' Ihyd, 11, pp. 218, 219.
' Kilab al-Arba'in, p. 251.
Ihyd, III, p. 22. Mfzan al-'Amal, p. 21.
is a mirror able to reflect the truth and its perfection, and that by which it is distinguished from
all the lower animals, consists in this aptitude, but very often there is a veil over the mirror which
hinders the reflection.. Yet, as a veil may sometimes be removed by the hand and sometimes by
the action of the wind moving it, so also the breezes of the Divine grace may blow, and raise the
veil from men's hearts and reveal therein something oof the Eternal Truth. That may happen in
sleep and also in waking hours, when the veil is raised by God's favour, and there shines within
the human heart something from behind the curtain of the Invisible. So to the inmost self Reality
as a whole may be revealed so that the whole of existence is reflected in it and it comprehends
the Universe. I
The human soul, since it is Divine in its origin, the effect of the inbreathing of the Eternal Spirit,
existed before the body to which it is temporarily attached while in this world, but with which it
has no real affinity, the body being only its vehicle and instrument. The spirit itself is like a
radiant sun and its light is dimmed only while it inhabits this temporal body, in which it is a .
stranger, but that sun will rise again when this body, which obscures its light, passes away. 3 In
his Qasida al-Ta'iyya, al-Ghazali conceives of the soul as being one in essence with its Lord
before it descended into this world for a period of affliction in the body. The death of the body
means, for the soul, only a return to the state in which it was before it was abased.' He quotes the
words of the Prophet, to the effect that " Bodies are the cage of birds or thestable of beasts of
burden," but the soul, when released from that cage, flies upwards to its own
abode. 4
This visible world is a road along which man journeys, but his native land and his permanent
abode is the world invisible.
i Mfzan af'Arial, p. 31. Ihyd, III, pp. 16, 450. 1V, p. 431. III, p. 450• This latter conception finds
a curious parallel in the experience of the German mystic Jacob Boehme (1575-1624) who wrote
: " I saw and knew the Being
of all Beings, the Byss and the Abyss-the Descent and Origin of the World and-of all creatures
through the Divine, Wisdom.... In this Light my spirit suddenly saw through all and in and by all
the creatures it knew Cod Who He is and what His Will is." The Aurora; Chap. XIX.
' 1iiy.,, .IV. T1. 20. at-Ris4lat al-Laduniyya, p, 30. Ma'arij.al-Quds, p. 13o,
i 222, 233•
n,.::i al al-I asanlf fi'l-Ta¢awwuf, p. id and cf. p. 113-above.
K
b
is
146 AL-GHAZALI'S 'MYSTICAL TEACHING
This phenomenal world is like a sleep in relation to the Divine
world! as the Prophet said : "Men are asleep and when
they die, they awake." The realities of waking hours can be
shown in sleep only by images and so what will come to pass
in the awakening of the life to come is seen in the sleep of this
world under an image, and things are seen only as types. When the soul returns to its Lord,, it is
awakened and knows the Reality of what was only typified before. I
al-Ghazali, therefore, believes in the immortality of the soul.
If the soyl.is not immortal then all of which we have been told and which"we have experienced
is vain." 2 He quotes the Qur'anic verse : " Say not of those who are slain for the sake of God
that they are dead, nay, they are alive." s The soul, being a siihpie essence, having real existence,
a spiritual thing, Divine in nature, cannot be subject to corruption or mortality, and al-Ghazali
develops the argument with great subtlety, bringing it to a triumphant conclusion. 4 Since the
human soul is the sphere of faith and gnosis, death has no power over it. "The heart of the
believer does not die and the knowledge he possesses at the time of his death is not obliterated
and his state of purity is not defiled, and that is the meaning of the saying ' The dust does not
devour the abode of faith,' nay, rather death is a means of access and approach unto God.- 6 That
sun, which was temporarily veiled by the body, must return to its Creator and Maker, either
darkened and eclipsed, or shining and radiant, and the sun which shines with its pristine radiance
will not be veiled from the Divine Presence. 6 The soul which descended from its Divine Source
to inhabit a body in this terrestrial world will ascend again to that higher world " it will look
towards its Source and unto Him it will return." 7
Ihya, r[I, p, g, IV, p. 21. Cf. St. Paul "Here we see through a glass
darkly, but then face to face." I Cor., xiii, 12.
' Mi'raj al-Salikisn, p. 23. ' Sura Ir, 149,
s Ma'artjIal-Quds, pp. 126-134. Cf. al-Risalat al-Laduniyya, p. 29. Ihya, II p I
g
,. ' Ihyo, IV, p. 26. .
s at-Risdlat al-Laduniyya, p. 30. Cf. Fatihal al-'Ulum, p, 40
CHAPTER X
The Beginning of the Ascent, The Creature and the Creator.
It is on this conception of the relation of the human soul to God that al-Ghazali bases his
teaching on the mystic Path, by which the soul ascends whence it came. He relates the saying of
a certain gnostic who said that God has two secrets which He makes known to His servant. The
first is revealed when he comes forth from his mother's womb and his Lord says unto him : I
have brought you forth into this world, pure and undefiled, and I have committed your life unto
you and given it to you in trust, therefore look how you fulfil that trust and consider in what
manner you will meet with Me hereafter." The second is revealed when the spirit returns to Him
Who made it and He says : " My servant, what have you done with that which I committed unto
you ? Have you so preserved it that you can meet Me having fulfilled your trust, so that I can
fulfil My promise unto you ? Or have you so squandered it, that I must meet you with a claim
against you for requital ? "
The soul, then, belonging to the spiritual world, bearing the image of the Divine, a mirror able to
reflect Reality, was pure (salim) in its origin-" every child is born with an innate sense of
religion," but through its association with a material body in this lower world, the soul has fallen
from its high estate. The mirror has become tarnished and the pristine purity of the soul defiled :
".that fair countenance has become disfigured by the dust and defilement of sin." 1
In considering the causes by which the human soul has become alienated from its Divine Source,
al-Ghazali has recourse to the tradition : " God hath Seventy Thousand Veils of Light and
Darkness : were He to withdraw them, then would the glory of His Countenance consume every
one who looked upon Him." al-Ghazali considers that these veils vary according to the
I
I Ihya, IV, P. I1.
147
different natures of those veiled from the One Reality. The
first class of these are veiled by Pure Darkness, the atheists
who believe neither in God nor His judgment, and these can be
subdivided into those who regard Nature as the cause of this
world, and those who are not concerned with causality, but
with themselves. Their own selves and their dark lusts are
the veil they establish between themselves and God. Of those
who are veiled by self some make sensual pleasures their chief
aim, others are ruled by the love of power, or riches, or personal
renown. All of these are veiled from God by pure darkness,
and they themselves are darknes- fk- '
The second class are those veilr~, o} ht mingled with dark
ness, and they are of three types. The first are those veiled by the
darkness of the senses, all of whom have passed beyond mere
absorption in themselves, for they look for a God and long
for the knowledge of their Lord, the lowest rank of these being the idolaters and the highest the
dualists. The idolaters make to themselves images of gold and silver and precious stones and
regard these as gods, and they are veiled by the light of Glory and Beauty from the attributes of
God and His Splendour, because they attached these attributes to material bodies, and the
darkness of the senses has barred them from the Divine Light. Some tribes believe that their god
must be something of great beauty, so if they see a beautiful human being, or tree or horse, they
worship it as their god. They are veiled by the light of Beauty, mixed with the darkness of the
senses. Others think that their god must be essential Light, but perceptible to the senses. They
find that Fire answers to this description and they worship it as divine. These are veiled by the
light of Might and Splendour, which really belong only to the Light of God. Others seek for what
has absolute control and is exalted and sublime and so they put their faith in astrology and the
influence of the stars. These are veiled by the light of Exaltation, of Radiance and Dominion, and
these, too, come from the Divine Light alone. Another group hold that their deity must be the
greatest of lights, so that they worship the sun, and these are veiled by the light of Grandeur. The
last of
these maintain that their deity must have no partner in luminosity and so they worship Absolute
Light, which includes all lights, and believe that Light strives with darkness, and these are the
Dualists. There are, also some in this second class who believe in the true God, but have false
notions about Him, such as the anthropomorphists. All of these are veiled by light mingled with
darkness.'
The third class are veiled by pure light. They are free from anthropomorphism, for they know
that the Divine attributes are beyond all human attributes, but yet they do not attain to the highest
conception of the Divine Unity, which is that of the Unveiled, who attain to a Being Who
transcends all that is comprehensible by sight or insight, for they find Him to be indescribable
and inconceivable. 2
It is to be noted that, while all the veils come between the soul and its vision of God, and all
prevent it from recognising Him as He really is, the darkest of the veils are due to the self and its
desires, so that the soul which is entirely self-centred and self indulgent, is farther away from
God than the idolater or the Fire-worshipper or the Dualist, who at any rate recognise something
higher and better than themselves and seek to worship it.
The purpose of the mystic, then, is to set the soul free from its fetters, to purify the heart, to
polish the mirror, and so remove the veils between the soul and God, so that it may he able to
return to its true home, to know God as He is and once more be united with its Source. This
search of the soul for God is the greatest of all quests. " If he who seeks the King Supreme in the
abode of Eternal Bliss possessed a thousand thousand souls and a thousand thousand lives, each
like the life of this world and longer, and if he were to spend them all in this great quest, it would
be little enough, and if he attained thereby to what he sought, he would have gained a Prize far
beyond all he had given." 3 Again al-Ghazali prays for one of his disciples: " May God decree
for you the search for the highest bliss ; may He prepare you for the ascent to the highest height ;
may He
2 1 alishkat al-Anwar, pp. 140 ff. Ibid., p. 144.
Alinnhaj al-Abidin, p. 9z.
' Alishkoe al-Anwar, p. 139.
I
9
anoint your inward vision with the light of Reality ; may He empty your inmost self from all save
His own Presence."'
Since all the veils are due to a wrong conception of God, some setting up themselves and their
lusts as gods, some worshipping His gifts instead of the Giver, others mistaking His true nature
and attributes, the first step to be taken on the return to Him is for the soul to realise what is His
real nature and what is its own relation to Him. It must acknowledge His transcendence as
Creator and its own creatureliness and need. Those who neglect this task are no more intelligent
than the ant which has made its home in a royal palace, the dwellingplace of fair maidens and
noble youths,.which is adorned with many rare and precious things. The ant, when it comes out
of its hole, talks to its fellow-ants only of its home and its food and how to hoard it, but the
beauties of the palace and the royal state are far beyond its consideration, it is concerned only
with itself and its material needs. So, too, man, unmindful of his Creator and the heavens which
are His dwelling-place, knows no more of them than the ant in the roof of his own house knows
of him. But whereas the ant is incapable of understanding the palace and its rarities, man has the
capacity to think upon the Divine world, and to recognise its
wonders.'
Men are too apt, like the ant, to concern themselves with the
means rather than the Final Cause. They think of the rain as
being the means of the sprouting of the seed and its growth,
and the clouds as being the cause of the rain, so, too, they think
of the wind as causing the boat to sail on its course, but all of
this is really polytheism and ignorance. The one who reflects
on the real meaning of things realises that the wind must have
some motive force behind it, and that has a further force behind
it, which ultimately comes back to the First Movent, Who is
not moved in Himself. If a man who has received a royal
letter of pardon begins to think about the ink and the paper
and the pen with which the pardon was written, and imagines
that his deliverance is due to the pen, not to him who employs
Mishhal al-'Anwar, p. 9-9.
' 14a, 1V, p. 381.
it, he is guilty of the greatest folly. But he who realises that it is controlled by the king's hand,
pays no attention to the pen, but gives thanks only to the writer. So, to the spirituallyminded
man, every particle in the heavens and the earth has been made articulate by the Divine Power,
so that these utter their praises to God Most High, while bearing witness to their own impotence.
All things are holding secret and ceaseless converse with the Most High and to the spiritually-
Minded they whisper the secrets of the King and His Kingdom, but only those who listen will
hear.'
" You ought to know yourself as you really are," aI-Ghazali writes, " so that you may understand
of what nature you are and whence you have come to this world, and for what purpose you were
created, and in what your happiness and your misery consist, for within you are combined the
qualities of the animals and the wild beasts and the angels, but the spirit is your real essence and
all beside it is, in fact, foreign to you. . . . So strive for the knowledge of your origin, so that you
may know how to attain to the Divine Presence and the contemplation of the Divine Majesty and
Beauty, and deliver yourself from the fetters of lust and passion . . . for God did not create you to
be their captive, but that they should be your thralls, under your control, for the journey which is
before you, to be your steed and your weapon, so that you may therewith pursue your happiness
and then cast them under your feet." 2
The true happiness of everything and its joy consists in its attainment of the perfection belonging
to it. The perfection proper to man is his comprehension of the real meaning of things, and this
goes beyond imagination or feeling, which the animals share with him. The soul within itself
thirsts for this perfection and, through its innate religious feeling, is prepared for it, and is kept
from it only by its pre-occupation with bodily desires, when these pre-dominate, but when a man
gains control over them and the reason is freed from its servitude to the body, then he concerns
himself with reflection upon the kingdom of the heavens and the earth, nay more, upon himself
and the
' Ihvd, IV, PP. 213, z14.
' Kdniiyo al-Sa'dda, pp. 4, 5.
0
u
F1
152 AL-GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING '
wonderss of his creation, and so attains to the perfection proper to him and to the joy of that
attainment.'
There are three stages on the Path which ,will lead the soul to re-union with its Source, the
salvation which all desirethat of the novice or seeker (al-murid) the creature conscious of its
creatureliness and acknowledging the lordship of the Creator: that of the traveller, who is 'mid-
way (al-sd'ir), the servant walking with his Lord : and that of the perfected gnostic, the one who
has attained (al-wasil), the lover rejoicing in the Beloved.
The novice is concerned with the knowledge of himself and his Lord and its fruits, he is subject
to wagl. 2 This stage means effort and toil, and the drinking of bitter draughts and the sacrifice of
pleasure and ' the undertaking of what is a torment to the self, 3 The novice can be greatly helped
by a wise spiritual director, who is well acquainted with the defects of the self, and understands
its secret sins, which he can make known to the novice, and he can help him to overcome them. "
He who finds a Shaykh, a gnostic, wise, realising the faults of the self, compassionate, able to
give counsel concerning the religious life, one who has accomplished the amendment of his own
spiritual life, and is concerned with the amendment of God's servantshas found the physician for
his ills. Let him cleave to that physician who will deliver him from the destruction with which he
is threatened, for the heart is 'sick' if it cannot accomplish the work for which it was created,
knowledge and wisdom and the love of God and His service and delight in the thought of Him,
and the preference of that over every other object of . desire."
Repentance is the beginning of the Way and the "key of happiness " for the novice, for it means
the return from alienation to proximity and it is based on faith, the conviction that there is no god
but God. Faith appears as a spot of light in the heart and when it leads to doing that which is the
will of God,
• dnadn al-'A,nal, p, 15.
' lVagt is defined by Tustari as "search for knowledge of the state which
exists between him and God in this world and hereafter." Cf. P. 131 above
and Cf. Ilujwlri Rashf, p. 13(1).
• Rawdal ql-Tdlibin, p. 145. 1 Ihyd, III. PP. 55, 56, 54.
AL-GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING r53
it grows and increases until the whole heart becomes bright. Then sin is seen to be poisonous and
destructive, and godly fear and contrition give rise to the sincere desire for amendment of life,
for the abandonment of sin in the present and the future, and for reparation for sins of the past. "
Contrition," writes al-Ghazali, " results from the realisation that sin intervenes between the sinner
and the Beloved ; it is the grief of the heart when it becomes aware of the absence of the
Beloved."' So will repentance be made perfect, for the fire of contrition consumes the dross of
sin and the light of good works obliterates the darkness of evil deeds. 2 The medicine of
Repentance he describes as an electuary compounded of the sweetness of knowledge and the
bitterness of patient endurance, just as oxymel combines the sweetness of sugar and the acidity
of vinegar, each of which plays its part in the cure, when they are combined together.'
Repentance, he says elsewhere, consists of knowledge, feeling and action. The penitent has the
knowledge that his heart has become veiled from its Beloved. He is like one upon whom the sun
shines, after he has been in darkness, upon whom light is shed by the dispersal of the clouds, or
the withdrawal of the veil, so that he is able to see his Beloved. He realises that he had been on
the point of destruction, but the fires of love were kindled in his heart and stirred up his desire to
arise and amend his life, to cast off " the garments of ill-faith " and to spread out the " carpet of
good faith."' The penitent can draw near unto God only by cutting off the heart's attachment to
the vanities of this world and turning his face wholly towards God, seeking for fellowship with
Him, and for love towards Him by the search for knowledge of His Majesty and His Beauty. Sin
is the cause of alienation from God, but He is ever ready to accept the repentance of His creature.
" When My servant calls unto Me, I answer him, and to him who seeks My forgiveness, I will
not grudge it, for I am near at hand, ready to give ear unto his request." Al-Ghazali, in this
connection, quot
1 IhYa, IV, p. 30.
• Kildb al-Arba'fn, p. 186. Ihyd, I, p. 107. IV, p. 11.
• Ihya, IV, p. 44
• i.e., in regard to his Lord. Cf. p. 147 above.
0
0
also the saying of Ibn Mas'ud,1 that Paradise has eight gates, all of which are sometimes open
and sometimes shut, except the gate of Repentance, which has an angel in charge of it, and is
never closed. 2
Repentance is the realisation of the separation from God caused by sin, and it involves spiritual
suffering greater than the physical suffering inflicted upon the body, by fire or sword, for while
the destruction of the body means the separation of parts closely knit together, that which binds
the soul to its Beloved is a still closer bond of union, and the pain of separation is the more
intense. Those possessed of spiritual insight, whose eyes are open to their loss, feel this
separation from God most keenly ; others, less spiritually mature, feel it less, just as the boy,
given the choice between the pain of being deprived of bat and bail, and deprivation of royal
rank, does not feel the latter to be painful at all and says : "A spacious courtyard and the
possession of bat and ball is dearer to me than a thousand thrones and the right to sit thereon." 3
Now the penitent enters upon the contest between the impulse to what is spiritual and the
impulse to what is sensual. and the battlefield is the human heart. He needs the patience which
will enable him to stand fast by what is spiritual, in the face of what is sensual, and this is the
first stage of patience, which means the abandonment of sensual desire. 4 Sovereign power that
is, the power to do what one wishes, is dear to all in this world and that is natural enough, al-
Ghazali feels, for lordship (al-rulubiyya) is one of the attributes of God and is sought by the
human heart because of its affinity with the Divine, but the Law and the Gospel and the Qur'an
and all inspired writings were sent simply to call mankind to a royal power, which is not earthly
but eternal. Men are meant to be kings in this world and the next, but true royalty in this world
means asceticism and the renunciation of it and contentment with but little therein, and royalty in
the world to come is obtained through the approach unto God Most High, whereby man becomes
immortal and
' One of the Companions of the Prophet, ob. 32/625, a great authority on the text of the Our an.
• Ihyd, IV, pp. 3 fl. P. 13.
• 1hyd, IV, pp, 22, 23
enters into a glory which does not pass away and joy unknown in this present life. Asceticism
means that the seeker controls his passions and makes them subordinate to the spirit, through his
faith, and this is sovereignty worthy of the name, since he who has it is set free from the bondage
of the flesh, he is no longer a slave to lust. Those who strive to walk upon this road will be
victorious both in this world and the next. 1
Asceticism, which al-Ghazali considered to mean striving against the world, the flesh, and the
devil,-like Repentance, includes knowledge, feeling and action. The ascetic, who renounces what
is sensual and material, knows that what is abandoned is of small value in relation to what is
gained, as the merchant knows that what he receives in exchange is better than what is sold,
otherwise he would not sell. The ascetic knows that what is Divine is abiding and that the joy of
the world to come is greater and more enduring than any pleasure in this world, just as, for
example, precious stones are more valuable and more enduring than snow and it is no hardship
for the owner of snow to sell it in exchange for precious stones and pearls. So it is with this
world and the next, for this world is like snow placed in the sun, which continues to melt until it
disappears altogether, 2 but the world to come is like a gem, which is imperishable, and he who
is assured of that is prepared to sell all that he has for the sake of obtaining that treasure. Again
al-Ghazali compares the ascetic with one who is prevented from entering into the presence of the
king, by a dog at the gate of the royal palace ; to this dog he throws a morsel of bread and by thus
distracting its attention, he is able to enter and approach the king, from whom he obtains all he
desires. Will he consider that the morsel of bread thrown to the dog is to be compared in value
with what he has obtained;
' 1hyd, I1', p. 68.
a We are reminded of the lines of ' Umar Khayyam, a contemporary of alGhazSli, who met him
at least once and was probably acquainted with his quatrains,
" The worldly hope men set their hearts upon,
Turns ashes-or it prospers and anon
Like snow upon the desert's dusty face
Lighting a little hour or two, is gone."
Cf. also the Parables of the Treasure hid in a held and the Pearl of Great PriceMatt- XIII, 44, 46.
' 1hyd, IV- PP- 53, .58.
]0
r
Satan is like a dog at the door of the King of kings, hindering men from entering in-though the
door is open and the curtain lifted-and this world is like that morsel of bread.'
In this connection al-Ghazali quotes the words of Hasan al-Basri, who said of this world
" It is as dreams when one sleepeth, or a fleeting shadow,
The wise are not deluded by such as these."
He tells also of an Arab who halted at an encampment, where food was set before him, and
afterwards he went to sleep in the shade of one of the tents. They struck the tent, and the sun
falling upon him roused him and he stood up and recited
" Is not this world like the shadow of a mountain ?
Assuredly one day your shade will vanish." 2
So the seeker must be prepared for the sacrifice of everything which veils the heart from God, for
the heart controls the outward conduct, and if it is corrupt, then his life and actions will be
contrary to the will of God. When the walls of a house are illuminated by the fire-light, but the
ceiling is dark and blackened with smoke, you know that the cause of the blackness differs from
the cause of the light : so also, al-Ghazali observes, what enlightens the heart is different from
what darkens it : the former is celestial in origin and the latter a Satanic suggestion. It is by grace
that the heart is enabled to receive what is good, and by the seductions of Iblis that it welcomes
what is evil. As Abu Yazid al-Bistami said : " A heart which is free from Satanic suggestions is
like a house, by which thieves pass : if there is anything in it, they exercise their skill upon it, but
if not, they go on their way and leave it alone. So also, if the heart is empty of lust, Satan does
not enter it." The novice is like a traveller who finds himself, on a dark night, in the wilderness,
where there are many obscure paths, and he cannot hope to find his way except by means of a
discerning eye and the light of the sun, when it rises. What corresponds to the discerning eye is a
heart cleansed by godly abstinence, and the rising sun is the knowledge which can be gained
from the Word of
God. 3
1 Ihyd, IV, p. 381. a Ihyd, III, p. 156. IJiyd, III, pp. 2, 23, 24, 27.
Elsewhere al-Ghazali compares the heart to a well which it is
desired to purify from muddy water, so that the, water which
flows from it may be pure. Every heart which admits Satanic
suggestions to poison the remembrance of God, has muddy
water in it, which may be drained away at one side, but flows
into it from the other, so that the owner's toil is fruitless. But the discerning man dams the course
of the muddy water and allows only the clear water to rise in the well, that is, he gives his heart
over to the remembrance of God alone. I
The chief hindrances on this first stage of the Way are, therefore, the world, the flesh, i.e., the
lower self, and Satan, and when the seeker, who seeks God alone, has accomplished the
purification and amendment of the self and its qualities and has watched over his heart in order
to purify it from all defilement, and is following the direct road, and the world is despised in his
eyes and therefore he has renounced it ; when he has detached his desire from the creatures and
does not turn towards them-for his heart is concerned only with God Most High and joy in the
remembrance of Him,' and in prayer to Him, and the longing to meet with Him-then Satan
cannot seduce him with worldly temptations or selfish desires for Satan no longer has any power
over him. 2 Sufism, said one of the Sufis, is a matter of character, and beauty of character means
that evil has been put away and good has takert its place.
The novice is now ready to pass on to the next stage, for the soul has been freed of its fetters, the
veils of darkness have been rent, the mirror has been cleansed of its rust, brightened and
polished. In reference to this first stage,, which is the purgative life, and its fruits, al-Ghazali
relates a beautiful allegory, which tells how the Chinese and the Greeks came into the presence
of a certain king and vied with one another in boasting of their great skill in drawing and
painting. So the king decided to assign to them a corridor, one side of which should be adorned
by the Chinese, artd the other by the Greeks, and a curtain should be let do> rn between them, so
that neither group could see the work of the other. His commands were carried out,
' Ihyd, IV, p. 273. ' Ikyd, III, P• 354.
and the Greeks began by collecting a great quantity of rare colours. But the Chinese entered upon
their task without any supply of colours at all, and proceeded to brighten their side and polish it.
Then, when the Greeks had completed their work, the Chinese claimed that they also had
finished, whereat the king marvelled, for how had they finished their painting, without the use of
colours ? They were asked " How can you have completed it without materials and without even
beginning the work of painting ? " The Chinese replied: " That is not your concern. Raise the
curtain." Then the curtain was drawn aside and behold, on their side, were reflected all the
wondrous paintings and rare colours of the Greeks, shining with greater brilliancy and more
clearly than on the other, for their side had become like a bright mirror through their patient
efforts, and the beauty of their side was enhanced by much polishing. So also the seekers after
God are solicitous in the purification of their hearts and the brightening and polishing of that
which is meant to be the mirror of the Divine, to receive the reflection of the glory of God.'
! 1hyd, III, p. ig. Mizdn al-'A,nal, p. 37.
CHAPTER XI
The Mystic Path. The Servant and his Lord. The Illuminative Life
The traveller has now passed beyond the stage of the beginner or novice, concerned chiefly with
purification, whose journey brought him only to the gateway of the King's abode, but now, al-
Ghazali says, it is for him to enter the wide spaces of the courtyard, and he quotes the words of a
wise man who said : " The pious say : 'Open your eyes that you may see,' but I say 'Close your
eyes that you may see.'" The first saying is applicable to the seeker at the beginning of the Way,
who is near to the Royal dwelling, but the second is more fitting for the traveller who has passed
beyond the gateway and entered the precincts. Such a one jeopardises himself in search for the
Object of his desire, and not all who start on the quest will face the dangers and the weariness
involved in pursuing it to the end. In this stage the traveller passes from one state to another
(talwin), as he draws nearer to his goal.'
This stage on the way corresponds to the world of Celestial Power (jabarut) in al-Ghazali's
cosmological scheme.2 This scheme includes three worlds through which the traveller must pass,
the first being the material, visible world ('slam al-mulk wa'l-shahada), manifest to the senses,
and the third the World Invisible ('alarn al- rnalakut), which is manifest to the spirit. " There are
two worlds," al-Ghazali writes, " Spiritual and Material, or, if you prefer, Sensible and
Intelligential, or again a Higher World and a Lower World, according to your point of view,
regarding the worlds themselves, or in relation to the eye which sees them (outward in the one
case, inward in the
1 1hyd, II, p. 219. Cf. also I,nld', p. go. Raw4at al-Talibtn, p. 541. Cf. Ilujwiri, " The significance
of talwtn is change and turning from one state to another," and he notes that this is the stage of
those who have not attained
op. cit., P. 37-2
a Cf. p. 107 above.
159
mU
u
r6o AL-GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING
other) or in relation to one another."' So, too, al-Ghazali:
points out, man consists of outward bodily parts and sensible
qualities, and the inward, spiritual attributes and capacities.
The material world has no real existence, but its relation to
that other world is like the relation of the shadow to the body,
and the real essence of man does not consist in. his shadow.
So also the corporeal form has no real existence, but is the
shadow of the reality, which is the Divine world. Therefore
nothing belonging to this world can claim the servant's allegiance,

for the worship of shadows is abhorrent, true worship must be
directed towards the One, Who is the Real.
The world of sense-perception corresponds to the stage of the
novice, who is concerned with the temptations of the self and the senses, which come to him
from the outward world, and with the effort to purify himself from the defilement which they
cause. Between this base world and the Divine world lies the second world, that of jabarut,
which al-Ghazali compares with a ship moving on the water, away from the land; it has not the
constant motion of the water, nor has it the complete immobility of the land and its stability. He
who walks on the land is like one passing through the world of mulk and shahkda, but when he is
strong enough to sail on a ship he has passed into the world of jabarut, and when he reaches the
stage of being able to walk upon the water, needing no ship, then he walks in the world of
malakitl, without sinking.2 The world of jabarut is therefore the stage of the traveller who is mid-
way on his journey ; he has left the land behind and is free from the fetters of a sensual, self-
centred life, but he has not yet attained to a life altogether dominated by the spirit. His inner eye
is open and he sees the goal clearly and hastens towards it, but is not yet there. Of this state al-
Ghazali writes that he who follows et;il with good and wipes out the traces of it, has no darkness
ii his heart, but his light is still " somewhat dim," like a mirror that has been breathed upon.'
Yet the servant has much now to encourage him on his ascent, for he who has repented of sin,
and accepted the obligation of
i Alishkat al-Anwar, pp. 122 Il.

Ln1a', p. 221. Kildb al-Arbaln, P• 54. ' Ihyd, 111, p. 11.
obedience, has the joy of intimate converse with the Most High God and of rest in the knowledge
of Him and obedience to His will and long periods of fellowship with Him, and if the servant
were to obtain no further reward for his efforts than what he finds of the sweetness of obedience
and the sense of fellowship in'communion with his Lord, that would be enough.'
The traveller is now walking in the light, which comes from the gift of the Divine grace. It is for
the servant to seek help from his Lord, to strive to do His will, to discipline himself in
accordance with that Will, but it is God Who gives him help on the way, Who crowns his efforts
with success, Who grants grace to make his discipline effective, and Who draws near to the
servant seeking to approach Him.' That does not depend on the servant's choice, but it is for him
to choose to prepare himself for that Divine rapture (al jadhba), by detaching his heart from all
lower attractions, which would prevent him from being attracted by what is supernal. It is to be
noted that for the Divine grace al-Ghazali uses the term jadhba (lit. attractive force) for it is the
Lord Who draws man unto Himself, He is the true Seeker and the quest is, in truth, evoked by
the One Sought. al-Ghazali quotes in this connection the words of the Prophet : " During your
life here, your Lord has gifts to bestow upon you (nafahat, lit. fragrant breezes), therefore come
within reach of them," for those gifts and raptures are of Divine origin. Again the Prophet
declared that God descends every night to the firmament of this world, saying : ' Is there any who
prays ? I will answer his prayer' For the Lord hath said. 'The righteous have long yearned to meet
with Me, but I have a still greater yearning to meet with them '."'
The Lord is ever ready to give ; our business, says al-Ghazali, is only to make the place empty
and to await the descent of His mercy. We are like one who ploughs the ground and hoes it and
sows the seed, but all that will not avail him without rain, and he does not know when God will
cause the rain to fall, only he trusts in the grace of God and His mercy, in leaving no year
without rain. So, too, there is seldom a, year or a
a Ihya, TV, p. 52. t Rawdat al-Talibrn, p. 139. s llay6, II, p. 8.
Ibva, IV, p. 216.
V
r.
0P
rbz AL-GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING
month or a day, without some rapture and some gift. The servant, therefore, must purify the heart
from the weeds of sensual desire and sow within it the seed of goodwill and sincerity and expose
it to the quarters whence blow the winds of mercy. Just as the expectation of rain is greatest in
the season of Spring, and when clouds appear, so also the expectation of these Divine graces is
greatest in holy seasons, when the concern is concentrated and the heart uplifted. When the
whole concern is set upon God, then His grace is outpoured upon that one, and the Divine
mysteries are revealed to him and the real meaning of things made plain. The servant has only to
prepare himself through complete purification and to have his intention present, with a sincere
will and ardent desire, watching with expectation for what God Most High will reveal to Him, of
His mercy. For to the saints and prophets revelation was made, and their souls rejoiced in
attaining to the perfection possible to them, not by means of study, but by asceticism in this
world, and by shunning it, and cleansing themselves from its hindrances, and concentrating their
whole concern upon God, and, " when anyone belongs to God, God belongs to him." In truth, al-
Ghazali adds, spiritual states and Divine revelations are actually present within your heart, but
you are distracted from them by worldly ties and sensual desires, which veil you from them. But
when that veil is raised, then the radiance of the knowledge of God is seen within yourself.'
In such a heart, purified by godliness, the light of the lamp from the niche of Divinity a shines
forth, so that there cannot be concealed within it that secret polytheism which is more
secret " than the creeping of the black ant on a dark night,"
for nothing is hidden from this light. Such a heart, cleansed
from all that is destructive, will soon be furnished with all that
makes for salvation-gratitude, patience, fear and hope, trust and
other virtues, and so become a heart acceptable unto God, the
heart at rest in Him.' "The rule of the Sufi," al-Ghazali

says : " is that Poverty should be his adornment and Patience
1 MMi:dn aI-'Amal, P. 34, Ilyd, IV, p. 67.
' S5ra XXIV, 35, " God is the Light of the heavens and the earth ; His Light is like a niche,
wherein is a lamp." 3 lhyd, III, p. 40.
his ornament and Satisfaction his steed and Trust his dignity. God alone is sufficient for him ; he
employs his members in acts of devotion, and it may be that he has no desire at all for worldly
things, or if he has, only for what suffices for his needs. His heart is pure from defilement and
distraction through his love for his Lord and he looks towards Him in his inmost self, committing
all things to Him, and having fellowship with Him. He does not rely upon anything, nor does he
have fellowship with any, save Him Whom he worships, preferring God to all else."'
The fruits of God's grace, then, are the virtues, His gift, whereby the traveller is helped to
advance on the Path. The first of these to be considered by al-Ghazali are Patience and Gratitude.
"Praise be to God," he writes, "Who is most worthy of praise and thanksgiving,
Unique in His mantle of
greatness, Alone in His attributes of glory and exaltation, Who helps the elect among the saints,
with the strength of Patience in prosperity and adversity, and Gratitude for afflictions and
blessings alike." Faith itself, he says, consists of two halves, half patience and half gratitude.
Both virtues are necessary for the traveller towards God, for he may expect that trials and
sufferings will come upon him in greater measure than others so that, through the endurance of
affliction, his faith may shine forth more brightly. One of the gnostics said that patience hac'
three stages, the first the abandonment of desires, i.e., the patience to endure without what is
desired, and this is the stage of the penitent; the second satisfaction with whatever is decreed by
God and this is the patience of the traveller who is mid-way, and finally love for all that his Lord
does, which is the rank of the spiritually perfect.'
Gratitude is the complement of Patience. " He who eatsuntil he is satisfied and is thankful," says
Al-Ghazali, " is in the same station as he who fasts and is patient." Like other stations on the
mystic way,. al-Ghazali considers it to include knowledge, feeling and action, for knowledge is
the origin of it, which gives rise to feeling and the emotion produces action. The knowledge is
the recognition of the gift bestowed by the
t Raze4al al-Talibfn, p. 143
2 Ihyd, IV, p. 53 if• 6o• Cf. Abu Talib, Q:a al-Qulab, I, p. 199•
Giver and the feeling is the joy of the one receiving His gifts, and the action is- the observance of
what the Giver desires, and what is acceptable to Him. The servant's knowledge is not completed
until he knows that all gifts come from God and the means (by which these gifts are bestowed)
are under His control. This knowledge lies behind the acknowledgment of the Unity and the
Divine holiness, for these form part of it. When God is known as Essential Holiness, it is realised
that One alone is Holy and One alone God. Then the servant realises that everything in the world
has been brought into existence by the One and every good gift comes from Him. Nothing in the
invocation of God is worth more than " Thanks be to Him " (al-hamd lillah), but it not to be
supposed that its value comes from the movement of the tongue in uttering these words apart
from the realisation of their significance within the heart. " Glory be to God " (subhan) is the
phrase which signifies admission of His Holiness, and " There is, no god but God " (la allah illa
allah), indicates confession of His Unity This knowledge that all gifts come from the One debars
polytheism in action, i.e., the servant will not attribute any of them to the creatures, instead of the
Creator, nor regard the creatures as responsible for what is profitable or injurious to him.
Perfect gratitude consists in the servant's joy in the gifts of God, because he is thereby enabled to
draw near to Him and to dwell in His Presence and to contemplate His Face continually. This is
the highest stage of gratitude and the sign of it is that the servant does not rejoice in this world
except in so far as it is the place of sowing for the world to come and helps him thereto, and he is
grieved .by any gift which distracts him from the remembrance of God, for, as Shibli said : "
Gratitude is the vision of the Giver, not the gift." I
Fear and Hope also mark stages in the progress of the traveller, and these two can likewise be
analysed into the elements of knowledge, feeling and action, for they arise from knowledge and
result in action, but the terms apply primarily to the feeling. If expectation, arising from
knowledge of God's mercy towards the sinner and also His wrath upon sin, looks towards what is
' Ih) , IV, Pp. 70, 71, 72. CL Qushayrl, Risata, p- io6.
abhorred, and produces suffering, it is called Fear, and if towards what is desired, producing joy,
it is called Hope. Fear is the result of knowledge, the knowledge which was the mark of the
penitent, Hope is the result of assured faith. The sign of Fear is flight, and the sign of Hope is
search, and they are symbolised by the sanctuary, (haram, the sacred precincts), and the mosque.
He who enters the sanctuary of discipleship is safe from the creatures, and he who enters the
mosque, keeps his members safe from sinning against God. I " Praise be to God," al-Ghazall
writes, " Who makes His loving kindness and His reward to be hoped for and His wrath and
chastisement to be feared, Who keeps alive the hearts of His saints by the spirit of hope in Him,
so that He may urge them on by His loving kindness until they arrive at absorption in Himself
(fana'ihi), and withdraw from this place of affliction. which is the abode of His enemies." The
spiritually-minded know that this world is the sowing-ground for the world to come and the heart
is like the soil and faith like the seed therein, and the life of devotion represents the ploughing of
the soil and cleansing it and digging the runnels and turning the water into them. The heart which
dotes on this world and is absorbed in it is like the earth which is saline : no crop will grow
except from the seed of faith, and faith seldom flourishes in a heart filled with impurity and evil
qualities, just as seed will not grow in earth which is saltish. The servant's hope of forgiveness
should be like the hope of the sower, who seeks for good ground and sows therein good seed,
neither mouldy nor brackish, and supplies it with what is needful, watering it from time to time,
and hoeing the ground and keeping it clear of all that would check the growth of the seed or
injure it, and then sits down, expecting that God, by His grace, will keep away thunderbolts and
all sources of injury until the seed has grown and the crop is ripe. Such expectation is called
Hope. Though God's mercy is due to His grace, not to human merit, yet the servant must at any
rate strive to be worthy of it.
" You hope for salvation and do not follow the way thereto, But the ship will not move upon dry
land."
I .1fiuhnj al-'Arifin, p. too.
wl yl wl
w
t
Action in accordance with Hope, aI-Ghazali considers to be of a higher order than action as a
result of Fear, because the servants nearest to God are those who love Him best, and love
prevails through Hope.' Yet Fear has its place also, since it is based upon knowledge of what is
to be dreaded, which is summed up in sin against God, which veils Him from His servant, and
godly fear leads to action to avoid it. al-Ghazali quotes a tradition which declares that God
created Hell out of His great mercy, as a scourge wherewith to drive His creatures into Paradise.
Yet the highest form of Fear is not the fear of chastisement, nor even of sin, but only the
servant's fear lest he should be debarred for ever from the contemplation of the Eternal Beauty,
But the servant, as he advances, will pass beyond both these stages to something higher than
either, for both are really reins which hinder the soul from complete freedom, and when the soul
is truly free, there will be no place for Fear or Hope. 2
Among the highest of the stations of the travellers who are drawing near to God are those
characterised by the virtues of Trust in God (tawakkul) and Unification (tawhid), which, to the
ordinary believer, meant the acknowledgment of the Divine Unity, but to the Sufi meant the
merging of the personal, individual will in the Eternal Will of God. In al-Ghazali's view, these
two stations are closely connected. " Praise be to God," he writes at the beginning of his teaching
on this subject,
" the Sovereign Ruler of this world and the world to come,
Unique in glory and might, Who upholds the heavens by the
word of His power alone (lit, upon nothing) 3, Who provides
all His creatures therein with their daily bread, Who turns the
eyes of the righteous and the wise from the consideration of
means and secondary causes to the Ultimate Cause, and prevents
them from concerning themselves with what is other than Him,
and from reliance upon any power save His. Therefore they
worship none but Him, knowing that He is the One, the Unique,
the Eternal God, and being convinced that all creatures are
but servants like themselves. They need not to ask for their
104, IV, PP 123 d• 2 Ihyd, IV, pp. 130, 135.

' Cf. Job XXVI, 7, " He stretcheth out the north upon empty space and hangeth the earth upon
nothing."
AL-GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING 167 daily bread, for not the smallest ant but has been
created by God, and there is no creeping thing but He provides sustenance
for it. So, being assured that He has taken upon Himself to provide for His servants and in Him
they can put their trust, they depend upon Him and declare : " God is our Sufficiency and how
excellent is He in Whom we trust." 1
Like the other virtues, Trust includes knowledge, feeling and action ; the term itself is applied
generally to the feeling, but that results from knowledge of the Divine Unity which is " a vast
and shoreless sea." Tawhid means the realisation that all things come from God and secondary
causes and means are of no account. One of its effects is Trust, and another which al-Ghazali
notes is that the Unitarian ceases to complain against the creatures or to be angry with them and
is satisfied with-and submissive to-the Will of God. Tawhid he describes as a precious substance
which has two outer coverings, one farther away from the kernel than the other, and people
generally limit the name to the outer rind and the business of preserving it, and completely
overlook and neglect the kernel. The first rind is represented by the declaration of the tongue : "
There is no god but God" (which excludes, e.g., the doctrine of the Trinity accepted by
Christians), but it may be made by the hypocrite, whose outward utterance differs from his
inward belief. The second rind corresponds to the affirmation of one who is really convinced of
the truth of what he affirms, and this is the Tawhid of the common people and the theologians,
who seek to preserve this rind from being corrupted by heresy. But the third type of Tawhid is
the kernel, when all things are seen to come from God Most High and the vision of Him
obliterates all that comes between, and He alone is worshipped and none other. This kind of
Tawhid is the station of the truly sincere (a1-Sadigittl).2 The real Unitarian is he who sees only
the One and turns his face not to any earthly Qibla but towards Him alone. 3
Such Tawhid means that the servant can abandon himself
11hya, IV, p. -210.
2 "Sidq" said Dhu'I-Nun, "is the sword of Cod on the earth: it cuts every
thing that it touches," and Hujwirl adds: " Sidq regards the Cause and does
not consist in affirmation of secondary causes." Kashf al-jllahjiib, p. soi' Ihyd, 1, p. 30. Cf.
also 1hyd, IV, p. 2rz and p. yr above.
a
to God in complete trust and merge his will in the Divine Will. The servant no longer finds his
own powers and personality to be adequate, he has ceased to be self-sufficient and has allowed
God to dominate his life. In all that he does or leaves undone he is in the hands of God like the
corpse in the hands of the one who prepares it for burial : he considers himself as a dead body
moved by the Divine decree and is content that the Divine strength should replace his own
human weakness. This degree of Trust means the abandonment of intercession for personal
needs, for the servant relies upon his Lord's grace and His care, believing that He will take the
initiative in giving more than he asks, for how many a gift has been given by Him, before it was
asked for and without being deserved. al-Ghazali quotes the words of Dhu'l-Nun' who said of
Trust that it was " the casting of the soul into self-surrender (al-'ubudiyya) and the withdrawal of
it from self-assertion (al-rubitbiyya)." Again, al-Ghazali gives the words of one who said : "All
of God's creatures receive their provision from Him, but some eat with humility like flee
beggars, and some with constant labour, like the artisans, arg~some with glory, like the Sufis,
who contemplate the All-Glorious and take their daily bread from His hand and see nothing that
comes between (no secondary cause)."'
These stations (magdnidt) involve the active life of virtue ; The middle of the Sufi's journey, says
al-Ghazali, is action and the seeker's effort to move from station to station brings him nearer to
the object of his search. But for such progress, which depends upon the Divine gift of " states,"
the mind and heart of the servant must be open to the influence of his Lord. The object of the
self-surrender involved in tawakkul and tawltid is that the soul of the seeker may be controlled
and guided by the Divine light within him, and this means the presence of the heart in the
practice of Meditation and Recollection, which lead to Contemplation. 3 For these, solitude and
withdrawal
r The great Egyptian Sufi ob. 245/859. Cf- my Shudies in Early Mysticism pp. 191 ff.
' Ihya, IV, pp. 225, 227, 230.
' Itmrdat al-7'utibtn, p. 145. CI. Hujwfri, "The term 'station' denotes the way of the seeker, and
his progress in the field of exertion-whereas the man that has a'state ' is dead to 'sell' and stands
by a 'state' which Cod creates in him." up. cit., p. 181.
are needed if the mystic is to " see " and know God and to enter into communication with the
Eternal. al-Ghazali uses a homely metaphor to prove the need for detachment from worldly
affairs -and human companionship, in comparing the hearts of men to water-pots : so long as
they are filled with water, the air does not enter them, and so the heart, pre-occupied with
anything but God, has no room for the knowledge of His Majesty.' The self cannot become
acquainted with its Lord nor become accustomed to the recollection of Him except when it is
weaned from its natural habits, by solitude and seclusion, firstly in order that its hearing and its
vision may be detached from what is familiar, and secondly that it may become accustomed to
praise and recollection and prayer in solitude, until familiarity with the recollection of God
prevails over it, in place of familiarity with the world.'
Solitude sets the heart free for adoration and reflection and communion through confidential
intercourse with God. Only the heart at leisure from itself is prepared to receive the revelation of
the Divine mysteries and such leisure cannot co-exist with social intercourse and the distraction
of human companionship. Time must be made for silent communing with God, for detachment
from immediate surroundings and the common round, in order to come into touch with the
Ultimate Reality. Withdrawal into solitude is the means for securing such detachment: The
solitaries are those who find rest from this world in the recollection of God and so continually do
they give themselves to recollection that while they live, He is always in their thoughts, and
when they die, it is with His Name on their lips that they pass into His Presence. $
Meditation and Recollection are the means by which solitude may be used to assist the soul in its
ascent to God. The real meaning of Meditation (muragaba), al-Ghazali says, is the attentive
apprehension (muldhaza) of the omnipresence of God (al-Ragib), the direction of all concern
towards Him, a state of introversion in which the heart is listening to His voice, pre-occupied
with Him, all the thoughts directed towards Him, being continually
Mumtwt, op. sit., fol' ig5b. Cf. p. 95 above.
j 11,iyd, III, p. 59. ' 1¢yd, 11, p. 202.
r70
conscious of His Presence. This state results from the realisa
tion that He is aware of the very secrets of men's hearts, and
to Him all things are unveiled, and it is the state of those who
have drawn near to Him (al-mugarrabun).
These can be divided into two classes : the'-first is that of the
Godfearers, the " people of the right hand," who are always
aware of God's regard upon their outward conduct and their
inmost thoughts, who remain conscious of themselves and their
actions and feel abashed before God. But the second class is
that of the " just made perfect " who meditate upon the Divine
Majesty and Glory, when the heart is so submerged in the
apprehension of that Majesty and so overcome by awe that
it cannot be turned aside to anything else. Such a one, absorbed
in Him Whom he worships, gives no thought to himself or his
actions, for his concern has become unified and God is sufficient
for him. He is forgetful of created things and does not perceive
who is present with him, though his eyes are open, and he does
not hear what is said to him, though he is not deaf, f-,- he who
is absorbed in the consciousness of the Presence of God speaks
only of Him and hears only in Him and has no need of words
and actions save in relation to Him. " This is the degree of
those whose hearts in meditation are overwhelmed by the
Divine Majesty and Glory, so that there remains in them no
place for anything else."'
By Meditation the heart comes to know the joy of entering into the Presence of God and
directing towards Him all its thoughts, interests and desires, and having known this joy, it seeks
the practice of the Presence of God at all times, which is Recollection (dhikr) 2, and this, says al-
Ghazali, is the most excellent of occupations, for by it the heart is enlightened and enabled to
contemplate the Vision of God. Godliness is the gate to Recollection and Recollection the gate to
revelation and revelation the gate to the goal of desire (al fawz al-akbar), which is the meeting
with God Most High. 3 Recollection is approached by three stages (qushitr) and the excellence of
these
' 140, IV, PP- 140, 341. Rau4ai al-Tdlibin, pp. i8q ft.
Cf, p. 95 above. 3 10j, III, p. 11.
stages is in proportion to their power to help the soul to its purpose of attaining to that Presence
in which it finds rest and peace. The first stage is Recollection with the tongue only, and the
second is Recollection by the heart, which still finds it difficult to concentrate on worship and to
keep free of distractions, and the third is Recollection which takes complete possession of the
heart and so prevails over it that it can with difficulty be diverted from it to other matters. This
leads to the highest degree of Recollection, when He Who is worshipped takes possession of the
heart and Recollection itself is obliterated and, disappears, and that is the end which is sought.'
By Meditation and Recollection the soul is led on to Contemplation (mushdhada), when the veil
is raised between the soul and God. The worshipper has entered into the sanctuary and there is no
more need of prayer. " When God is present and manifested," said the Sufi Dliu'l-Nun, " there is
no need to make intercession. If He were absent, then should intercession be made to Him." 2
Contemplation, says al-Ghazali, is of three types, contemplation bil_Hagq, which is the vision of
things witnessing to the Unity, and contemplation lil-Hagq, which is the vision of God in things,
and finally the contemplation of God Himself, the vision of Reality, which is certain and without
doubt. 2 To such a contemplative the manifestation of the Eternal and Invisible God is made as
clear as if seen with the eyes. The contemplative, when he reads the Word of God thinks not of
himself or what he reads, for in the word he sees the Speaker and in the words His attributes. He
is not concerned with himself or his reading or with the favours to be received from the
Benefactor, but only with the Speaker, his thoughts are fixed on Him and he is absorbed in
contemplation of Him, to. the exclusion of all else. This is the rank of those who have drawn
near to Him, for such a one no longer thinks of himself, but sees only the Most High and the
mystery of the Unseen is revealed to him, 3 This contemplation of the One Creative Truth is
sometimes continuous and sometimes comes
3 Kilab aI-.4rba'in, p. 52.
2 ahSulami, Tabagat, fols. 7b, 8a. So also Hujwiri says that Contemplation
means to be absent from self and present with God., op. cit., p. 155. 3 11nla, p. 54. Falihal al-
'Uhinm, p. 41. Ihya, I, p. 258.
a
J
n
R
r
i
P
172 AL-GIIAZALFS MYSTICAL TEACHING
unexpectedly like a flash of lightning, and this is what usually happens, continuous
contemplation is rare and unusual. 1 But the contemplative who has attained to this highest
degree of contemplation has come to the rind of the journey and has entered upon the Unitive
Life, which was =_:s goal.
r Ihyd, IV, p. 213.
CHAPTER XII
The end of the Path. The lover and the Beloved. The life of
the Saints in God
The highest contemplation, said Hujwiri, " is violence of love and absorption of human attributes
in realising the vision of God, and their annihilation by the everlastingness of God."' Love is
represented by al-Ghazali as the final stage of the mystic Way, 2 and as its goal. The lover is the
one who has attained (al-wasil) : he is the gnostic (al-àrif ). for " whoso knows his Lord loves
Him," and to him who loves is revealed still greater knowledge of the Beloved, the knowledge
which He Himself " casts into " the heart of His lover, by revelation and inspiration (al-wahy and
al-ilham), the knowledge from on high (al-'ilm al-laduni). To the lover is granted the Beatific
Vision here and now, to the lover is given the consummation of his desire, in union with the
Beloved.
In al-Ghazali's teaching Love includes Longing (shawq), for the lover longs to be with his
Beloved, Fellowship (uns), for he is in intimate communion with Him Whom he loves, and
Satisfaction (ridd'). The lover has entered the ranks of the " just made perfect " (al-sadiqun) and
those, whose singlemindedness (ikhlds) is without flaw, for his love has no taint of self-interest.
This stage includes the perfection of all the stations and states which have preceded it, which the
traveller has experienced on the way, but it transcends them all, for the mystic has no longer
need of states and stations. He who has reached the end of the journey, al-Ghazali states, has
attained to " sobriety " (sahu) 3 and permanence, and is listening at all times
r Kash/ al-Mahjuh, p. 165.
I For, as a modern writer observes : " Purgation leads to peace : illumination leads to truth:
perfection leads to love." P. Elmer More, Christian Mysticism, p. 44.
' " Sobriety," says Hujwiri, " expresses the attainment of that which is desired." op. cit., p. 185.
Cf. Ibn al-hand, " there is no 'where' after (vision of) Reality, since 1 have recovered from
intoxication and the cloud that veiled the Essence has been cleared away by sobriety." R. A.
Nicholson, Studies in Islamic Mysticism, p. 243
173
to the Divine Voice ; he has passed beyond the stations and is in the realm of achievement
(tamkin, lit. fixity)' he is unmoved by fears, and " states" affect him no longer. It is all'', one to
.him whether he suffers hardship or is at ease, whether he has little or much, whether men do him
wrong or keep faith with him, whether he eats or is hungry, whether he sleeps or. wakes. The
desires of the self (al-huzuz) have vanished that which pertains to the spirit (al-huquq) remains. 2
His outward self is with the creatures, his inward self is with the Creative Truth. s
The place of attainment (al-makan) al-Ghazali says elsewhere, belongs to those who have
reached perfection and tamkin, and have arrived at the goal. When the servant has perfectly
realised what attainment means, then it is assured to him and he has passed beyond stations and
states and becomes possessed of makdn, as one wrote :
" Thy place (makan) within my heart is the whole of it,
And there is no room within it, save for Thee."'
The soul is now called the tranquillised soul (al-nafs al-mutma' inna)_, the soul at rest, which
returns to its Lord, satisfied and giving satisfaction to Him, 6 and this stage corresponds to the
`slam al-,nalakut called also `slam al-amr, in al-GhazJi's cosmological scheme (cf. pp. lgq, i6o
above). "In this world;' he writes, "are wonders, in relation to which this visible world is
-seen to be of no account. He who does not ascend to that world . . . is but a brute beast, indeed
he is more in error than any brute beast, since the brutes are not given the wings wherewith to
take flight to that world. Know that the visible world is to the world Invisible. as the husk to the
kernel, as the form and body to. the spirit, as darkness to light, and -as the ignoble to the sublime.
Therefore that Invisible World is called the, World Supernal and the Spiritual World and the
World of
1 Cf. Hujwirl, " Tamkin denotes the residence of spiritual adepts in the abode of perfection and
in the highest grade-- amkin is the resting-place of adepts-repose within the shrine." op. cil.,
37r.
' Cf. the saying of a1-Tay3~lisl. al-R3zI, ' When the spiritual (al-(~uqdq)
appears the fleshly (al-hupt;).,vanishes away." Abu Nair al-Sarraj, Hitdb al Luma.
, P. 336.
' Raw¢u al-Talibin, p. 145,

' fmld, p. 52. This passage is quoted verbatim from al-Sarraj, Xitdb
al-Luma',p 335•
s Sign, LXXXIX, 27, 28.
Light. . . . He who is,in that world above is with God and has the keys of the Unseen."'
This, then, is the stage of perfection, which is the stage of the lover, and al-Ghazali has much to
say of Love. Love, he says, is of different types and the first is self-love, which includes a man's
desire for his own safety and preservation, love of wealth, because it is a means to self
preservation, love of wife and child and kindred and friends. These things are loved not for
themselves, but because they are bound up with the continuance of a man's own existence and its
perfection. I The second type is love for the sake of the benefit received from the person or thing
loved, and this, too, comes back to selfinterest : the benefactor is not. regarded as the desired
perfection itself, but as a means to it. So the doctor is loved,-not for his own sake, but because he
is a means to health, and money because of what it will buy : but if the benefit ceased, the love
for the benefactor would cease also. The third type is love of a thing for its own sake, not for the
pleasure to be obtained from it apart from itself, and this is real love, which can be relied upon tt
,,,~dure, such as the love of Beauty 9.nd Goodness. All beauty is loved by the one who is able to
perceive beauty, for the perception of beauty is a delight in itself, which is loved for its own
sake, not for anything else. Beautiful forms may be loved for themselves, and not for any end to
be obtained from them and that cannot be denied ; for instance, green things and running water
are loved for themselves, not for the sake of drinking the water or eating the green things. So,
too, with the blossom and the flowers and the birds, with their fair colwrs and beautiful shapes
and their perfectly symmetrical itm,is, the very sight of them is a joy in itself and all joy is
loved.,. It cannot be denied that where Beauty is perceived, it is natural to love it and if it is-
certain that God is Beauty, He must be loved by that one to whom His Beauty and J-Iis Majesty
are revealed.4 The fourth type of love is that_ inspired by Goodness and Beauty in the moral
sense. al-Ghazali concludes that the beauty- and goodness of everything consists. in the
• Miskkdi al-Anwdr, pp. io8, 109. CL Slim, VI, 59.
1 Ilyd. IV, p. 255. -
• t4yd, IV, p. 256.
A
F
presence of the perfection proper to it, e.g., the beautiful horse is one perfect in appearance and
form and colour and pace, easy to wheel round in battle, while beautiful handwriting is that,
which combines due proportion and combination of the letters with the right slope and
alignment. The same is true of the beauty which is perceived not by the senses, but by the insight
: the moral goodness and beauty which are the perfection of character. must be loved. The fifth
type of love is that due to the secret affinity (mundsaba) existing between the lover and the
beloved, for love between two persons may exist without any beauty or pleasure as the cause, but
simply because their spirits are akin.
If all these causes of love were combined in one person and the attributes which are loved were
to reach their highest perfection in that one, would not the result be the highest degree of love? In
God and. in Him alone are all these causes combined and all things lovable found in their highest
perfection. For it is to Him that man owes. his very existence and the qualities by which he may
attain to his perfection. He is the only real Benefactor, and the Ultimate Cause of all benefits. If,
where beauty is found, it is natural to love it, and if beauty consists in perfection, then it follows
that the All-Beautiful, Who is Absolute Perfection, must be loved by those to whom His nature
and Attributes are revealed.' For, as al-Ghazali observes, if love is aroused by the beauty
perceived by the physical eye, which is mistaken in much of, what it sees, regarding as small
what is large, and as large what is small and what is far off as near and what is ugly as beautiful,
is it unreasonable that love should be aroused by the eternal and everlasting Beauty, limitless in
its perfection, perceived by the eye of insight, which is not liable to error, nor subject to death,
indeed, it survives death, alive with God and rejpicing in Him. 2 And finally, man loves God
because of the affinity between the human soul and its Source, because it shares-in the Divine
Nature and- Attributes, because through. knowledge and love it can attaip to eternal life and
itself become Godlike.'
' Jhya, IV, pp. 258-262.
• 14,11 IV, p. 298.
• IAvd, IV, p. 263.
AL-GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL -TEACHING 177
Such love, when it has grown strong and overwhelming, is called Passion ('ishq) which has no
meaning but that of love firmly established and limitless. al-Ghazaii gives two examples of this
passionate love directed towards a human being, that of Zulayka (Potiphai s wife) for Yasuf
(Joseph), which meant the loss of her wealth and her beauty, for though (after her husband's
death, according to the Islamic legend) she possessed seventy camel-loads of jewels and
necklaces, she spent them all in her love for Joseph. To everyone who said to her ; I saw Joseph
to-day," she gave a necklace to enrich that one, until nothing remained to her. She remembered
nothing except Joseph because of her passionate love, and when she raised her head to the
heavens, she saw his name written upon the stars. But after her marriage to Joseph, a greater love
took possession of her and she refused to live with him as his wife, saying " I loved you only
before I knew Him, but when I knew Him, love of Him left no room for the love of any other and
I cannot give His place to another."
The other example is that of Majni n, who went mad for love of Layla, and when asked his name
would reply " Layla." When asked whether Layla was dead, he said : " Layla is within my heart,
she is not dead. I am Layla." One day, when he was passing by her house, he looked up to the
heavens and someone said to him : " 0 Majniin, do not look up at the heavens, but look at the
wall of Layla's house and perchance you will see her." But he said : " I am content with the star
whose shadow falls upon Layla's house."
So, too, it was related of Mansar al-Hallaj, a passionate lover, who laid down his life for his love,
that his friend Shibli visited him after he had been in. prison for eighteen days and asked him. " 0
Mansar, what is love ? " and al-Hallaj said : " Do not ask me to-day, but ask me to-morrow," and
when the morrow came and he was brought forth from prison and the executioner spread out his
carpet, to slay him, Shibli passed by and al-Hallaj called out : " 0 Shibli, the beginning of love is
a consuming fire and the end thereof is death." al-Hallaj, also, when he came to know that
everything save God was of no account and that God was the Sole Reality, forgot his own name
and when asked:
I
i
" Who art thou ? " replied, " I am the Creative Truth " (that is,
I am one with Him Whom I love).'
" It is reasonable," al-Ghazali declares, " to give this passionate
love to that One from Whom all good things are seen to
tome.-In truth, there is nothing good or beautiful or beloved in this
world, but comes from His loving kindness and is the gift of
His grace, a draught from the sea of His bounty. For all that
is good and fair and lovely in the world, perceived by the intellect
and the sight and the hearing and the rest of the senses, from
the creation of the world until it shall pass away, from the
summit of the Pleiades to the ends of the earth, is but a particle
from the treasuries of His riches and a ray from the splendour of His Glory. Is it not reasonable
to love Him Who is thus described and is it not comprehensible that those who have mystic
knowledge of His attributes should love Him more and more until their love passes bounds ? To
use the term "passion" for it is wrong in regard to Him, for it fails to express the greatness of
their love towards Him. Glory be to Him Who is concealed from sight by the brightness of His
Light, If He had not veiled Himself with Seventy Veils of Light, the splendours of His
Countenance would surely consume the eyes of-fhose who contemplate the Beauty which is
His." 2 -
But the lover who claims to love the Most High must spew the signs of love, for Love, al-
Ghazali considers, is like a goodly tree, firmly rooted, the branches whereof reach up to the
heavens, and its fruits are manifest in the heart and by the tongue and the other members, and
these fruits are an indication of love, as smoke is an indication of fire. Among the signs of love
to God is that the lover has no fear of death, for it means meeting with the Beloved face to face
in the Abode of Peace. To the lover, there is no hardship in journeying from his own land to the
home of the Beloved, in order to be blest by the vision of Him 3 ; death opens the way to that
meeting, it is the gate of entrance to the Vision. To lay down life itself for the sake of
1=Mukishafal al-Qulr]b, pp. 23. 24. Ihyd, II, p. 2.47.J Cf. the lines of Ja131 al-pin Rrimi:
Up, 0 ye lovers and away I 'Tis time to leave the world for aye, 0 heart, toward thy heart's love
wend, and - friend,Ay tcu'awq.-tlw Friend." R. A. Nicholson, Eastern Poelry and Prose, No, 136.
,
his Lord is the mark of sincerity in the lover.' Another sign of love is the sacrifice of the lover's
will to that of the Beloved, and in this connection al-Ghazali quotes verses which he attributes to
Ibn al-Mubarak (ob. A.H. 18o), which are attributed elsewhere to the woman mystic Rabi'a al-
'Adawiyya of Basra:
" You disobey God, while you claim to love Him :
This, by my life, is, a strange thing to do,

If your love were sincere, you would have obeyed Him, For surely the lover obeys his Beloved."
2
Another mark of the lover of God is that the remembrance of Him remains ever fresh in his
heart, without effort on his part, for what a man loves he remembers unceasingly and if his love
is perfect, he is never unmindful of it. al-Ghazali gives a tradition which relates how God said to
David : " He spoke falsely who claimed to love Me if, when night concealed him, he was
unmindful of Me. Does not every lover desire to meet with his Beloved ?. And here am I present
with him who seeks Me." 3
Another sign that the love of God prevails in the heart of the lover iS that he loves his fellow-
men, for all are God's servants indeed, his love will include the whole creation, for he who loves
anyone, loves -his. work-.and his handwriting and his possessions.' It is the mark of the lover,
too, that he is eager to be alone, so that he may converse in secret with his Beloved, and he longs
for the approach of night, so that in stillness and silence he may meet with Him Whom he loves.
Finally the sign of love is that the lover finds easy all that he does for his Beloved, The flesh may
fail him and his body become weary in well-doing, but his spirit is tireless and rejoices in
service. The Prophet once asked : " 0 Lord, who are Thy lovers?" and the answer came : "Those
who cleave to Me as a child to its mother : ' those who take refuge in the remembrance of Me as
a bird seeks the shelter of its nest : those.who
r Ikyd, IV, p. 282.

e ILyd, IV, p. 284. Cf. Suhrawardl, 'dwnrif al-Ma'drif. Ihyd, IV, p. 344
(marginlM
a Ihyd, IV, p. 285. This recalls a lover of God, who was ever mindful of
Him. Rabi a of Basra, whose prayer al-Ghardll records : 0 my Lord, the stars are shining and the
eyes of men are closed and kings have shut their doors and every lover is alone with his beloved
and here am I. alone with Thee." Ihyi, IV, P• 353
A Ihyd, IV, p. 285.
ii
are as angry at the sight of sin, as an angry lion who fears
nothing."'
Love includes Longing (shawq), for every lover longs for the
beloved when absent. Within his heart is the image of the
beloved and he longs that the image should be perfected by
vision. The lover of God knows that perfect revelation can be attained only in the life to come,
when his contemplation will be uninterrupted and his joy increase evermore, and for that he
longs, but he knows that much may be revealed here and now, and he longs to see more of the
Beauty and the Glory of God and to attain to perfect union with the Beloved. al-Ghazali relates a
tradition of how the Lord said to David : " Tell My people that I am the Lover of him who loves
Me and the Companion of him who desires My company and in fellowship with him who seeks
My fellowship through Recollection, the Friend of him who is My friend : I choose him who has
chosen Me. There is none who has loved Me with a perfect heart, but I have received him unto
Myself and I have loved him with a love passing that of the creatures. Ho vho sought Me in
truth, f+mnd Me and he who sought any other, found Me not. Come, then, to partake of My
grace and My fellowship and sit down with Me and enter into communion with Me and I will
hasten to satisfy your love. For I have created the nature of My lovers after the nature of
Abraham My friend and Moses My confidant and Muhammad My chosen and I have created the
hearts of those who long for Me, from My light, and I have glorified them with Mine own glory.-
2
Again al-Ghazali says that God declared to one of " the just made perfect " :. " I have some
among My servants who love Me and I love them, who long to meet Me as I long to meet them.
They keep Me in remembrance and I remember them : they contemplate Me and I look
continually upon them. If you have followed in their steps, I have loved you and if you have
turned aside from following after them, I have turned aside from you." He said : "Lord, what is
the sign of these?" He said : ".They seek the shade by day as the compassionate
I Ihya, IV, p. 286. Ihya, IV, p. 278.
AL-GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING r8r
shepherd seeks it for his flock and they yearn for the setting of the sun, as the bird yearns for its
nest, and when night covers them and darkness falls and, every lover is alone with his beloved,
they bow down in adoration before Me. The first thing I give them is to cast My light into their
hearts and they know of Me what I know of them. As for the second, were the heavens and the
earth and all they contain apportioned to them, I should think it little for them. The third is that I
shew them My Countenance and he to whom I shew My Face knows the utmost limit of that
which is My secret."
al-Ghazali relates also a tradition that David asked who were those who longed for their Lord
and the Lord replied : " Those who long for Me are those whom I have cleansed from all defile-
ment and have aroused to eagerness, and I have opened their hearts so that they may contemplate
Me. Their hearts are in My hand and I take them forth and set them in My Presence in the
heavenly places. Then I summon the noblest of My angels and they, when they have assembled,
bow down in worship to Me, and I say : In truth it was not to worship Me that I bade you come,
but to shew you the hearts of those who long for Me, and to boast of them unto you, for their
hearts give light to My angels in the heavens as the sun gives light to those who are in the earth,"'
Love results in Fellowship (sans). Fellowship, says al-Ghazali, is one of the most glorious fruits
of Love and its real meaning is the rejoicing of the heart and its delight in the revelation to it of
the proximity of the Beloved and His Beauty and Perfection. Nearness to God means that when
the heart has been purified from self-regard He is present with His lover (for between God and
man there is only the veil of self). He who has drawn near to God knows that all things, from the
foundation of the world, existed aforetime in His knowledge and are a manifestation of Him,
brought into existence by His Will and His power, which enabled them to exist and to subsist.
The attributes cannot be separated from that one to whom they belong, indeed they subsist in that
one, so that,the lover who is in fellowship with God does not speak of himself or hear of
' 11iya, IV, p. 278.
1
;
1i
;
himself, for it is the Divine attributes which are manifested in and through him.'
Fellowship, al-Ghazali considers, is to Longing what finding is to search, for when the lover is
aware of imperfection and absence, his heart is disturbed and this disturbance is called "longing"
for what is absent or invisible. But when joy prevails with him because he has approached the
Object of his desire and has entered into the presence of his Beloved and is contemplating the
Beauty which is revealed to him, that joy in the sense of intimacy is called Fellowship. To such a
lover someone said : " You are one of those who long," and he replied : " No, longing is only for
one who is absent and when He Who was absent is present, for whom should one long ? " "
These are the words," writes al-Ghazali, " of one who is absorbed in the joy of what he has
attained." The mark of Fellowship with God is the desire to be alone with Him, and a passionate
absorption in the sweetness of Recollection. 2 " No one enters into fellowship with God but one
who has given much time to 'the recollection of Him, for perfect fellowship means that the mind
and the understanding have become absorbed in the joy of inward converse with their Lord, as
one who talks with his
beloved." 3
Among the fruits of love is Satisfaction (rida'), 4 which includes the Satisfaction of God with
man, and man's Satisfaction with God, i.e., his complete acquiescence in the Divine Will, Satis-
faction may be due to the lover's absorption in the object of love, which prevents him from
feeling any affliction which comes upon him. Thus, a passionate lover, wholly concerned with
his love, pays no attention to what would otherwise hurt or grieve him, if it comes from some
other than his beloved, still less if it is due'to the beloved, and if this is conceivable in regard to
slight affliction, because of earthly love, is it not conceivable in regard to a greater affliction, if
the love is greater? If the love of beautiful forms perceptible by the outward vision
r Rau4at at.TatibIn, pp. T81, 182.
t Ihva, IV, pp. 291.
a lhya, IV, pp. 314, 285. Cf. Ihya, II, p. 216.
4 " Satisfaction," said Hujwlri, " is the result of love, inasmuch as the lover
is satisfied with what is done by the Beloved." op. cit., p. 18o.
is strong, so also is the love of fair visions within, perceived by the light of insight, and the
beauty of the Divine Glory and Majesty, with which no other beauty or glory is to be compared.
That one to whom any part of it is revealed is overcome with amazement and is unconscious of
what befalls him.
It was related that the wife of Fath al-Mawsili stumbled and was hurt, but laughed and when
asked if she did not feel the pain, she said " The joy of His reward has taken from my heart the
bitterness of His pain." Sahl al-Tustari (ob. 283/896) suffered from an illness for which he used
to treat others, but did not treat himself, and when asked why, he said : " 0 friend, the stroke of
the Beloved does not wound."
But there is also the Satisfaction with pain that is felt and perceived, which is naturally disliked,
yet may be desired, e.g., satisfaction with a surgical operation which causes pain, yet is desired,
and satisfaction with travel which involves hardship, but also profit and pleasure. So, too, with
the lover of God, the will of the Beloved and His good pleasure are what he seeks and if he
suffers affliction thereby, yet he is satisfied.' One of these lovers said : " I have loved everything
which He loved : even if He desired Hell-fire for me, I should desire to enter the fire." Bishr b.
al-Harith (ob. 227 /841), a great ascetic and mystic, related that he saw a man who had been
beaten with a thousand lashes in Baghdad and yet uttered no cry. When he bad been taken back
to prison, Bishr followed him and asked why lie had been beaten. " Because I was a passionate
lover," he answered, and when Bishr asked why he had kept silence under his sufferings, the man
replied : " Because rny beloved was opposite, regarding one." Then Bishr said : " If only you had
set your regard upon the greatest Object of love," and the man gave a great cry and fell dead. 2
al-Ghazali relates a story from Masr5q, who told how a man lived in the desert and possessed a
dog, an ass and a cock. The cock used to wake them for prayer at dawn, 3 they employed the ass
to convey water and to carry their tent, while the dog used to guard them. One day a fox came
and carried off the
Ihya, IV, pp. 297. ' 1._a, 1V, p. 298. : Cf. p. 5o above.
I
i
cock, and they were grieved at the loss, but the man was pious
and said : " It may be that it is for the best." Then came a
wolf and attacked and killed the ass, and they grieved for him
also, but again his master said : " Perhaps it is best." Later
the dog was taken, and he said likewise. That same day they
found that others had been raided and taken captive, while
they were left in safety and the man said : " Those others
were taken captive because the noise made by their dogs and
asses and cocks betrayed their whereabouts." It had therefore
been for their good that their animals were destroyed, in accordance with the Divine decree. So,
concludes al-Ghazali, he who knows the secret lovingkindness of the Lord is satisfied with what
He does in all circumstances."
al-Ghazali quotes as an example of Satisfaction the saying of Ibn Mas'nd (ob. 32 /652) : "
Poverty and wealth are two riding-beasts ; I do not care which of them I ride, if poverty, I can
exercise patience, and if wealth, generosity." 2 He quotes also the definition of Ibn 'Ata (ob. 310
/922) who said : " Satisfaction is the heart's acquiescence in the eternal choice of God for His
servant, assured that His choice for him is best, so he is satisfied therewith and abandons
discontent." Abu Said was asked if it was allowable for a man to be both satisfied and
dissatisfied, and he said : "Yes, it is allowable for him to be satisfied with his Lord and
dissatisfied with himself and everything which comes between him and God." al-Ghazali relates
how someone quoted to IHasan b. 'All the words of the famous ascetic Abu Dharr : " Poverty is
dearer to me than riches and sickness is dearer to me than health," and Hasan observed " May
God have mercy on Abu Dharr, but I say that he who trusts in the goodness of God's choice for
him does not desire to be in any other state than that which God chooses for him." So the lover of
God does not make intercession to Him, being satisfied that he needs nothing that is not already
his.
Satisfaction results in heart's ease and in joy, for heart's ease comes from the light of Certainty
and when that inner light burns steadily the heart rejoices and the inward eye is opened
' fhya, IV, p. 298. + Ihyd, IV, p. 299.
and the excellence of God's ordering of things is made plain and dissatisfaction and disgust find
no place. The heart is at rest when it is filled with the sweetness of love, for the true lover is
satisfied with all that is done by the Beloved, and it seems to him to be his own desire."
Love of God is rooted in the knowledge and understanding of His nature and the lover is
therefore the gnostic. " True gnosis," writes al-Ghazali, " is to abandon this world and the next
and to be set apart unto the Lord : it is to be intoxicated by the wine of Love and not to recover
therefrom except in the Vision of the Beloved, for the gnostic dwells in the light of his Lord." 2
Gnosis (ma'rifa) is the gift of God, a light which He " casts " into the heart.' " It is that," says al-
Ghazali, " which is attained without meditation between the soul and.its Creator: it is indeed a
ray from the Lamp of the Invisible, shed upon a heart which is pure, at leisure, spiritualised." a
Elsewhere he writes : " The sun which enlightens the heart of the gnostic is more radiant than our
earthly sun, for that sun may be eclipsed and sets, but the sun of gnosis knows no eclipse nor
setting." Deaf to the clamorous voices about them, blind to what goes on around them, uttering
no word in answer to those who would summon them to human affairs,. the gnostics see by that
Divine radiance in the secret place within the veil, which is the Presence of God. a
The gnostics differ in the degree of gnosis to which they attain, for Gnosis is a " shoreless sea,"
the depths of which cannot be fathomed, since none can comprehend the greatness of the Divine
Majesty, and those who plunge into this sf:a do so in accordance with their strength and the
precedence which God granted unto them before time was. 6 al-Ghazali quotes the words of
Junayd in regard to the gnostics : " Their spirits rejoice in communion with the Unseen, abiding
in the presence
• Rau'~fat a]-Talibin, pp. 250, 251.
• Llnkashaal al-Qulii, p. 30.
3 "Gnosis," said Hujwlri, "is the life of the heart through God and the turning away of one's
inmost thoughts from all that is not God. The worth of everyone is in proportion to gnosis, and
he who is without gnosis is worth nothing," op. ciL, p. 267.
• ul•Risdlal a!-Laduniyya, p. 45.
• Raw4al el-Talibin, p. 363.
' 1hva, IV, pp. 241, 270.,
I
IF
186 AL-GHAZALT'S MYSTICAL TEACHING
of the All-Glorious, the Pre-eminent, in the cloud of Glory which envelopes Him, in the shadow
of His Holiness.. They have attained to a high station and they pass on thence to yet greater
perfection, to an absolute glory which is immaterial, and they walk, clad in the mantle of
Unification." But gnosis, Junayd adds, is a thing to be preserved inviolate, a pearl not to be cast
before swine : to be given to those of God's servants, who are worthy to receive it, but to be
withheld from the unworthy. It is the mystery of God " and those who possess it must regard it as
such.'
This gnosis, which is granted only to those who have drawn near to God, means " a light which
is manifested in the heart when it is purified from its blameworthy qualities by sincere self-
mortification. In that light is revealed the true significance of things, the names of which were
heard before and their meaning understood but vaguely. Now their meaning is understood and a
real knowledge is attained of the Nature and Attributes of God, of His wondrous works in the
creation of the heavens and the earth, and His wisdom in regard to this world and the world to
come the gnostic knows the true nature of the human spirit and the relation to the world Invisible
which results therefrom. That distinctive nature is manifest when the senses are stilled in sleep,
and the spirit can contemplate the Unseen and perceive what lies in the future, being absent from
this world. For the spirit is attached to this world only by means of the senses, and during sleep
they are at rest."" But that "window" into the Unseen is not opened only in sleep and after the
death of the body. 3 It is opened in waking hours for the gnostic who has striven and is purified,
being delivered
from the power of sensual desire. Such a gnostic, sitting in
solitude, who closes the channels of the. senses and opens the
eye and ear of the spirit and places his heart in relation with the
Divine World, while he says continually : " God, God, God,"
within his heart, not with his tongue, ceases to be aware of
himself and of this world and remains seeing only Him Who is
Most Glorious and Exalted. Then that window is opened
I lhyd, IV, p. 288.
' Fdlihal at-'Ulum, p. 403 Cf. P- 145 above
AL-GHAZALT'S MYSTICAL TEACHING .187
and he sees in his waking moments that which he sees in dreams, and there appear unto him
angelic spirits and the prophets and wondrous forms, fair and glorious to behold, and the
kingdom of the heavens and the earth are laid open unto him, and he sees what it is not lawful to
describe. This gnosis goes far beyond the knowledge of the learned, for it enters the hearts of the
prophets and the saints direct from the Creative Truth Himself, nor can it be comprehended
except by those who have experience of it.'
al-Ghazali relates the tradition that God said to David " To know Me is to live in contemplation
of Me," so that Gnosis is made perfect in the Vision or God and the contemplation of Him within
the heart.' This is Contemplation in its perfection, for that measure of contemplation which was
granted to the traveller who was mid-way, was but " permission " to enter upon the way which
leads to Union, but this is "finding" (wajd) what was sought, itr means entering in and the actual
experience (dhawq) thereof. The gnostics in this world, says al-Ghazali, see their Lord with the
eye of assured faith and intuition (basa'ir), as in the world to come they see Him with their eyes
and face to face, but He is close to them both here and there, and there is no difference between
His nearness to them there and His nearness to them here, except that there it increases in
subtlety and favour, but in both cases the distance between has been made to disappear' a It is
indeed the possession of gnosis in this life which will mean what is called " Paradise " in the life
to come.
al-Ghazali, on this subject, quotes the words of Rabi a who, when asked what Paradise meant to
her, replied : " First the Neighbour, then the house," and he continues : " No one who
I Kimiy¢ al-Sa'ida, p. 16. Ihvd, III, pp. t8, ig. Cf. St. Augnstine, " If to anyone should grow
hushed the tumult of the flesh, hushed the images of earth, and if the very soul should be hushed
to itself and were by cessation of thought of sell to pass beyond itself. If we should hear Him and
in the flight of thought we touched upon the Eternal Wisdom, that which abideth over all things ;
if this were continued and other visions of a nature by far inferior were taken away and this one
alone should ravish and absorb and enwrap the beholder of it amid inward joys so that life
everlasting might be of such a kind, as?was that moment of comprehension for which we sighed
: were not this an ' enter thou into the joy of thy Lord?"' Confessions, IX, lo.
I Rawdat al-Talibfn, p. 152.
3 [bid., p. 182.
f
f
has not known God in this life can hope to see Him in the life to come, and only he who, has
found the joy of gnosis here will find the joy of contemplation there, since none can be in fellow-
ship with Him in that world, who has not walked with Him in this. None may reap who has not
sown, and a man is raised up only in the state in which he died, and he dies in the state in which
he has lived, and he takes with him only that gnosis which was bestowed upon him, which will
then be transformed into the Vision of God face to face, and his joy therein will be doubled, just
as the joy of the lover is doubled when the image of the beloved is exchanged for the reality, for
that is the consummation of his joy.
For the bliss of Paradise is to each one there only what he seeks, and he who seeks only the
Presence of God finds no joy save in Him and finds all else irksome. Therefore, since the bliss of
Paradise is in proportion to the love of God and the mystic's love of God is in proportion to his
knowledge of Him, the source of that bliss is the gnosis revealed through faith." " If you say" al-
Ghazali goes on, " that the joy of the Vision, if it is in proportion to the joy of gnosis, is but little,
even if doubled, for the joy of gnosis in this world is small, and even if it were great, it would'not
reach such a degree that all the other joys of Paradise would be despised in comparison with it,
know that this contempt for the joy of gnosis arises from being deprived of it. How can he who is
without gnosis comprehend its joy?" '
But the joy of the Vision of God is given in this life to those whose hearts have been so purified
that they can see God. The purpose of the.gnostics is only to attain to this high knowledge and to
possess in it a consolation revealing to them what to others remains unknown. When it is
attained, all cares and sensual desires are obliterated and the heart is filled with its grace. Even if
the gnostic were cast into Hell-fire, he would not feel it because of his absorption and if all the
delights of Paradise were displayed to him, he would not turn towards them, because his joy has
been made perfect and he has attained to what is above all else that can be attained. How can he
1 Ikya, IV, p. 269.
AL-GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING r8g
who understands only the love of sensible things believe in the joy of looking upon the Face of
God Most High, Who is without appearance or form? And what meaning for him has the
promise of God to His worshippers and His declaration that it is the greatest of joys ? But he who
knows God knows that all joys are included in this joy.' '
Again al-Ghazali writes that just as the, physical eye rejoices in vision, so the gnostic in this
world rejoices in the contemplation of the beauty of the Divine Presence, more than in all
imaginable joys beside it, for joy is in proportion to affinity, with what is desired. Now that with
which the heart has most affinity is gnosis, for the heart is the Divine spirit which belongs not to
brutes nor to brutish men, but to the prophets and the saints, and that which is itself Divine
reaches out to the Divine. 2
From Gnosis the mystic has passed to the Vision and in that Vision the mystic passes away from
the self into the One and attains to the state of Union which is the end of the quest. Of- those who
see in existence but One al-Ghazali says that this is the contemplation of the "just made perfect"
and the Sufis call it passing away into the Unity (,fans' fl-tawhid) because, since the gnostic sees
only the One, he ceases to see himself and since he no longer sees himself because he is
absorbed in the Unity, he has passed away from himself into the One.' In passing away from the
self, the mystic has also passed away from others : he seems to have passed away from all save
the One contemplated and he has passed away also from the Vision, for if the heart turns to the
Vision and to itself, because it is contemplating, then it becomes unmindful of the One contem-
plated. 4 " In such a state of absorption," says al-Ghazali, " the mystic is unmindful of himself,
he does not feel what happens to his body, and this state is called fana'. It means that he has
become absorbed in Another and his concern has become one concern and that is his Beloved ;
there remains in him no room for any but the Beloved that he should turn towards him, whether
that one be himself or another. This
1 Ihya, IV. P. 287.
Kita6 at-Arba'In, p. 259. Ihya, IV, p. 212. I ya, II, p. 256.
i
i
Igo AL-GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING
is the state which means attainment by the seeker, of the Sought." 1
For such a one the shadows of his own existence have been overcome by the victorious radiance
of the light of his Unification, for the light of his knowledge of the Unity is extinguished in the
light of his actual experience, as the light of the stars vanishes in the splendour of the light of
day. In this stage the existence of the unitarian is submerged in the contemplation of the Beauty
of the One, in the Whole itself, for he contemplates only the Essence of the One and His
attributes, and the waves of the ocean of the Unity overwhelm him and he is surmerged in the
One and All. 2
{ Again, al-Ghazali writes : " When the worshipper thinks no longer of his worship -or himself,
but is altogether absorbed in Him Whom he worships, that state, by the gnostics, is called Jand',
when a man has so passed away from himself that he feels nothing of his bodily members, nor of
what is passing without, nor what passes within his own mind. He is absent from all that, and all
that is absent from him : he is journeying first to his Lord, then (at the end) in, his Lord. But if
during that state_ the thought occurs to him that he has passed away completely from himself,
that-is a blemish and defilement. For perfect absorption means that be is unconscious not only of
i himself but of his absorption. For fand' from fang' is the goal
of fand'."
Orthodox theologians, al-Ghazali continues, " may regard these words as meaningless nonsense,,
but that is not so, for this state of the mystics in relation to HL Whom they love is similar to your
state in relation to what you love of position or wealth or a human love, when you may be
overcome by anger in thinking of an enemy or so engrossed in your beloved that you perceive
nothing else,, and do not heac.when someone speaks to you, nor see one who passes,,
though;~oiir eyes are open and you are not deaf, for this absorption makes you oblivious of all
else and even of the absorption itself. For any attention to the absorption means being diverted
from the cause thereof.
1hya, IV, p. 23.
' Rawdat al-Tulifdn, p. 153.
AL-GHAZALU'S MYSTICAL TEACHING 1191
So, having explained to you what is meant by fana' you should cast aside doubt. and cease to
deny what you cannot comprehend. ... This absorption at first will be like a flash of lightning,
lasting. but a short time, but then it becomes habitual, and a means of enabling the soul to ascend
to the world above, where pure and essential Reality is manifested to it and it takes upon itself
the impress 'of the Invisible World and the Divine Majesty is revealed to it . . . and at the last it
looks upon God face to face. When such a mystic returns to this world of unreality and shadows,
he regards mankind with pity, because they are deprived. of the contemplation of the beauty of
that celestial Abode and he marvels at their contentment with shadows and their allurement by
this world of vain deceits. He is present with, them in body , . . but absent in spirit : wondering at
their presence, while they wonder at his absence.""
These gnostics have ascended from the lowlands of unreality to the mountain heights of Reality
and at the end of the ascent they have seen 'for themselves that there is none in existence save
God Alone and that " all things perish save His Countenance,"? all. things have been foredoomed
to mortality save the One Himself. These gnostics when they return from their ascent to the
World of Reality are agreed that they have seen nothing existent, but the One, but some attained
to this state through knowledge and some by direct experience and for these latter,' plurality
passed away entirely. They were submerged. in the Absolute Unicity and their human reason
disappeared into its abyss, and they remained stupefied therein. They could no longer recall any
but God ; forgetting themselves, God alone remained with them. It. was in this state, al-Ghazali
declares, that one said : " I am the One Reality " and another "Glory be to Ate. How great is My
majesty," and another " Within this robe is nought but God." But the words uttered by passionate
lovers in a state of ecstasy, al-Ghazali feels, should be concealed, not spoken of. ' This state, in
the language of metaphor; is called Identity (ittihad) and in the language of reality Unification
(tazvhid).3
Kitab al-.-Irba'In pp. 52, 53, 55. Sara LXXXVIII, 23. 3 1lishkia al-dww'ar, pp. 113-115.
It means that the mystic has arrived at the goal and passed into the unitive life with God. "He has
entered into the pure and absolute Unicity of the One, and in the Kingdom of the One and Alone
mortals reach the end of their ascent, for there is no ascent beyond it, since ascent involves
multiplicity, implying an ascent from somewhere and an ascent to somewhere and when
multiplicity has been eliminated, Unity is established and relationship ceases, signs are effaced,
there remains neither height nor depth, nor one to descend or ascend. No higher ascent for the
soul is possible, for there is no height beyond the highest and no multiplicity beside the Unity,
and since multiplicity has been, effaced, no further ascent." 1
The mystic who has reached the end of the Path and ascended to the highest height is the one
who has attained what he sought and arrived}at his journey's end : he is the ua~al. Those who
have passed into the unitive life, writes al-Ghazali "have attained unto a Being transcending all
that can be apprehended by sight or insight, for they find Him to transcend in His sanctity
fall that we have described heretofore. But these can be divided for some of them, all that can be
perceived is consumed away, blotted out, annihilated, but the soul remains contemplating that
Suprene Beauty and Holiness and contemplating itself in the beauty which it has acquired by
attaining to the Divine Presence, and for such a one, things seen are blotted out, but not
the seeing soul. But some pass beyond this and they are the Elect
of the Elect, who are consumed by the glory of His exalted
Countenance and .the greatness of the Divine Majesty overwhelms
them and they are annihilated and they themselves are no more.
They no longer contemplate themselves, having passed away
from themselves and there remains only the One, the Real,
and the meaning of His word"All things perish save His Counten
ance " is known by actual experience.
This is the final degree of those who attain, but some of them
did not in their ascent follow the gradual progress we have
described, nor was the ascent long for them. At the very
beginning,: outstripping their compeers, they attained to a
1 knowledge of the All-Holy and the Divine transcendence.
tlishkjt al-Anwar, p. r18.
They were overcome at 'the first by what overcame others at the last. The Divine Epiphany broke
in upon them all at once, so that all things perceptible by the sight or by the insight were
consumed by the Glory of His Countenance " ; and al-Ghazali adds : "Ask that I may be forgiven
if my pen has gone astray or my foot has slipped, for to plunge into the abyss of the Divine
mysteries is a perilous thing and no easy task is it to seek to discover the Unclouded Glory which
lies behind the Veil.'" 1
But the mystic who has passed away from self is subsisting in Gods+fans' gives place, to bags',
mortality to immortality. This is the life,of the saints in God. al-Ghazali quotes the words of
Bundar 2 "who said : "He who draws near to this world, will ') be consumed by its flames that is,
by covetousness, until he is reduced to ashes ; he who approaches the world to come will be
purified by its fires and becomes a golden ingot which is profitable to others, but he who
approaches God is consumed`; by-the flaming splendour of the Unity and becomes an. essence
of infinite worth."'
• Praise be to God," writes al-Ghazali elsewhere, in solemn thanksgiving for the lives of the
saints, " Who bath freed the hearts of His saints from any inclination to the vanities of this world
and its glamour and bath purified their inmost selves from the contemplation of aught but His
Majesty. These are they whom He hath chosen for Himself that they might be devoted to the
proclamation of His Glory, to whom He hath revealed His Names, and His Attributes, until they
were illumined by the radiance of their knowledge of Him. To them hath He unveiled the
Splendour of His Countenance until they were consumed by the fire of His love." 4
The saints are those whose hearts are occupied with recollection, whose tongues utter praise to
God, whose members are occupied in His service. They find their happiness in fellowship with
Him and are never separated from His love. He is always mindful of them as they are of Him,
and He loves
1 Mishkat al-Anu'ar, pp. 144. 145a • lbn al-Husayn, a pupil of Shiblr, who died at Arrajan,
3531964. Cf.
Sarraj, Kildb al-Luma', pp. 269, 273, 278. s lkya. 111, p. 183.
• lhya, IV, p. 252.
V AL-GHAZALPS MYSTICAL TEACHING
193
I
them as they love Him and is well-pleased with them, even as they are satisfied in Him. Their
capital stock is poverty and their affairs are controlled by necessity. They have realised the
bitterness of sin and have found the remedy which could heal them. They are as lanterns, whose
light bears witness unto • God; keys to the treasure-house of His wisdom. Their path is made
clear before them by a light like that of the rising moon : they are the pure fruit of that blessed
tree, the root of which is the Divine Unity and the branches thereof godliness.' For those whom
He has chosen to be His saints God pours out a "draught from the cup of His love " and by
drinking thereof, thirst is increased.. The saint is as one rapt away, given over entirely to
contemplation. (majdhub). His, very self and his own attributes have disappeared and he has
passed from mortality into the Divine immortality. He is clothed upon with a robe of honour,
which is the Divine promise; " My saint hears by Me and. sees by Me.". God has taken him as
His friend : when he speaks, it is only to speak of Him and when he sees, it is by His light, and
when he moves, it is by His power, and if he is rapt away, it is. by His decree, and therewith
duality vanishes and is transformed into the One Reality. The saints, by the indwelling of the
Divine Spirit, have become deified (ruhaniyun). 2
al-Ghaaali relates a tradition telling how David asked the Lord to show him His saints, and he
was bidden to go to the Lebanon mountains and there he' would find fourteen souls, including.
the young and the mature and the old, and he was to give them greeting from their Lord and the
message : " Will ye not ask for what ye need, for ye are My friends and Mine elect and My saints
? I rejoice in your joy and I hasten to respond to your love. At all times I am regarding you with
the regard of a pitiful, tender mother." So David went his way and gave them the message, which
they received with eyes bent to the ground, and they listened with tears flowing down their
cheeks. But they had nothing to ask save that they might draw still nearer to the Divine Light,
and their only need was to look upon the Face of Him they loved,- Then the Lord
Minkdj.al-'AriJtn, p, 102.
Rau•dal al.Talibin, p. 131 Kilnb al-Arba'in, p. 249.
bade David say unto them : " I have heard your words and granted you your desire. I am raising
the veil between Me and you, that ye may look upon My Light and My Glory." Then David
asked by what means these saints had attained to such grace, and the Lord replied : " By right
thinking and detachment from this world and its people and communion, in solitude, apart with
Me; and this is a degree to which none attain except him who has ceased to be concerned with
this world, whose heart is at leisure, who; has preferred Me above all My creatures. Therefore I
have inclined unto him arid freed his soul, and I have raised the veil between us, so that he looks
upon Me face to face and My grace is with him at all times and I shew him the Light of My
Countenance. If he falls sick I tend him, even as. a pitiful mother tends her child : if he thirsts, I
give him to drink and make him to taste of the recollection of Myself, and so have I detached his
soul from this world and its people and they have ceased to be dear unto him. He does not weary
of devotion to Me, but hastens to draw near unto Me. . . . I am loath to decree his death, for in
him I make Myself manifest among My creatures. He sees none but Me and I see none but him
and I see that his. soul is melted within him, and his body emaciated and his hands bruised and
his heart broken.' By My Glory and My Majesty, 0 David, I will make him to sit down in
Paradise and I will satisfy his desire to look upon Me, until he is content and more than content."'
But the life of the saint is not limited to the joy of fellowship with God ; the light which he
receives from the Divine radiance is a torch whereby he gives light to others. It is for the saint,
al-Ghazali points out, to descend from the mountain of transfiguration to the lower levels of this
world, so that the weak may seek out his company and may kindle their lights at the radiance
which the saint has brought from the heavenly places, as bats find their light in what remains of
the sunlight, and are content with the light of the stars in the watches of the night, and thereby
live a life suited to their bodily state, though not the life of those who come and go in the full
light of the sun.
1 Ihya, IV, p. 279.
ii 1
196 AL-GHAZALT'S MYSTICAL TEACHING
The saint is one, whose eyes are open, so that ' he sees clearly and needs none to lead him, but it
is his busiries~ to lead the blind or those weak of, sight, for his relation ' to,-the weaker brethren
is that of one who walks on water to those who walk on land. Some may. learn to swim, but to
walk on the water is only given to those who have reached spiritual perfection. al-Ghazali says
elsewhere that it is the glory of the saint to spend himself for those in need and to undertake the
task of shepherding them into Paradise. 2, 'Again, it is the mark of saintship to chew compassion
to all God's servants, to be pitiful towards them and to fight for them, and with them, against the
forces of evil.,
al-Ghazali gives a word of encouragement to one: who cannot reckon himself to be among the
saitits of God,, bidding him at any rate to be a lover of the saints, having faith in them and it may
be that at the Resurrection he will find himself with those he loves. As a proof of this al-Ghazal-i
adds a. tradition that Jesus asked the Jews : " Where does the seed grow?" and they replied : " In
the earth." Then He said : " Verily I say unto you, Wisdom takes root only in a heart like. the
earth (i.e., which is soft and receptive of the truth)," and it may be, that those who seek to fulfil
the conditions of saintship will attain to it, through self-abasement and humility. 4
l' al-Ghazali gives thanks for the life of the saints in God in the
~` words : " Praise be unto God, Who hath consumed the hearts of His saints in the fire of His
love and hath taken captive their desires (himam) and their spirits by the longing to meet with
Him and to look upon Him and hath fixed their sight and their insight upon the vision of the
Beauty of His Presence, until by the inbreathing of the spirit of Union, they have become rapt
beyond themselves and their hearts have become distraught by the contemplation of the
splendours of the Divine Glory, so that they see naught but Him in this world or the world to
come, and they remember none in heaven or earth save Him
alone. If any form presents itself to their outward gaze, their
I Ihyd, IV, p. 84. Cf. p. 16o above.
• Mizdn al-'anal, p. 107.
a Ihyd, IV, p. 286.
• Ihyd, IV, p. 306.
AL=GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING 1197

inward vision passes beyond it to Him Who formed it: if sweet music breaks in upon their
hearing, their inmost thoughts pass from it to the Beloved. If any sound reaches them, which is
disquieting or disturbing or affecting or giving rise to joy or sorrow or making for merriment or
for longing or stirring up to excitement-they are disturbed only for His sake, their joy is in Him
alone and they are disquieted only on His account. Their grief is only in Him and their longing is
only for that which is to be found in His Presence, they are aroused only for Him, and their going
to and fro is round about Him alone. For from Him is all that they hear and it is to Him that they
give heed, since He bath closed their eyes to all but Himself and hat} made them deaf to all
words save His. These ate they whom God bath called to be His saints, having claimed them for
Himself from among His chosen and His elect."'
3 1 hyd, II; pp. 236, 237.
i
CHAPTER XIII
al-Ghazali's Influence: upon Islam and Suf is;n : upon Jewish. Thought and upon Mediaval
Christian Mysticism
al-Ghazali's influence was great even during his life-time,
and the widespread appreciation of both his lectures and his
writings made his teaching famous, while he was still alive,
among all Arabic-speaking Muslims, in the West as in the East.
At the same time, his fearless devotion to truth and his consistent
support of the Sufi doctrine incurred much criticism and hostility
on the part of the most orthodox theologians both before, and
after, his death.
In Andalusia, the Qadi of Cordova, Abu 'Abdallah M. b. Hamdin, condemned al-Ghazali's
works, and the rest of the Spanish Qadis accepted the condemnation, with the result that al-
Ghazali's books werd' burnt wherever found throughout Andalusia, and possession of them was
forbidden on pain of scourging or death. These books included the Ihya, but it is noted by one
writer that when it was later brought back to Spain, its return was received with satisfaction and
approbation, and he adds that one admirer even copied it out in letters of gold. 1 But the Qadi s
fatwa bears witness to the circulation of al-Ghazalii's writings, even at this early period,
throughout Spain, and no doubt this was largely due to the dissemination of his teaching by his
students, such as Abu Bakr M. Ibn al-'Arabi, who returned to Spain and taught in Seville after
having studied under al-Ghazali at Baghdad and elsewhere (cf. p. 64 above).
There is similar evidence that al-Ghazali's books were in circulation in North Africa. The Sultan
of Marakash, 'Ali b.
Yusuf b. Tashfin (477/1084-537/1142), whose empire included
not only North Africa, but the whole of Spain and the Balearic isles, was a bigoted fanatic in
religious matters, accepting the authority of the orthodox religious leaders of his time. A devoted
Malikite, he regarded both philosophy and scholastic
1 M. Ridaa, op, cit., p. 30.
198
theology as destructive to the true faith and al-Ghazali's books naturally came under his ban.
Orders were issued that they were to be burnt and anyone found in possession of any part of
them was threatened with confiscation of property and even with death. The biographer who
records this observes that the Maghibi theologians were jealous of al-Ghazali on account of his
authoritative position and profound learning and widespread reputation, and so " they did what
they did, but they did not attain their desire, for God enabled him to triumph over them and the
people welcomed his books and estimated them at their true value." 1
Among al-Ghazali's most bitter critics was Abu'l-Walid M. Ibn Rushd (Averroes), the Spanish
philosopher, bom at Cordova in 520 /1126. He was Qadi of Seville and for a time acted as Chief
Qadi of the whole of Muslim Spain. He paid several visits to Morocco and died there in 595
/1198. Ibn Rushd accused al-Ghazali of inconsistency in advocating the doctrine of emanation in
the Mishkat al-Anwar-he might have found other examples elsewhere in al-Ghazalis works; cf.
pp. ff. 1o6 above-while he expressly denies it elsewhere. Ibn Rushd quotes al-Ghazali's Maga~id
and his Tahafut alFalasafa, the Jawahir al-Qur'an, the Munqidh min al-Dalal the Kimiya al-
Sa'ada, and the Tafriqa bayn al-Islam wa'l-Zandaga. al-Ghazali's teaching, he considers, is
sometimes detrimental to the Shar' and sometimes to philosophy and sometimes to both, but may
equally be considered favourable to both. 2 Ibn Rushd perhaps failed to distinguish between al-
Ghazali the orthodox theologian and al-Ghazali the mystic, and between his earlier opinions and
those of his later years, and it is to the latter period that the Mishkat belongs. al-Ghazali's use of
terms in the mystical sense was not necessarily identical with the use of these terms by the
philosophers. Ibn Rushd had evidently made a close study of al-Ghazali s works, even if it was
only for the purpose of refuting them.
Another critic was Abu'l-Faraj Ibn al-Jawzi, surnamed Jamal al-Din, of Baghdad (ob. 597 /1200),
an able traditionist
' M. Rids, op. Cit., pp. 29, 31.
at-Kashf 'o nandhij al-adifa, pp. 57, 58.
and a celebrated preacher, and the most learned writer of his time, whose pen, very frequently,
was dipped in gall. Lines; which he composed and addressed to his fellow-citizens' in Baghdad
run thus : "There are people in Ìraq for whom ' I;' feel no friendship, but my excuse is. this.,
their hearts are formed of churlishness. They listen with admiration to' the words of a stranger,
but those of their own townsmen attract no attention. If a neighbour profited by the water which
flowed from the roofs of their houses, they,, would turn the spout in another direction. And when
reproached„ their excuse is : That the voice of the songstress has no cjlarms for the tribe to which
she belongs." 1 He was a bigoted Hanbalite, who attacked al-Harith a1-Muhasibi, on whose.
teaching al-Ghazali based much of his own (cf. pp. 123 ff. above), and attacked al-Ghazali
himself, for accepting al-Muhasibi's- views, ..and also, for his adherence to Sufism, to which
Ibn'f al-Jawzi 'himself was bitterly opposed .2
It was for the Sufis, writes Ibn al-Jawzi, that al-Ghazali wrote the Ihya and filled it with false
traditions, and was unaware of their falsity, and spoke of revelation and departed from the Canon
Law, and his words, says Ibn al-Jawzi, are a kind of esoterisism. He quotes also from his
writings the statement that the Sufis in their waking hours behold the angels and the spirits of the
prophets and hear their voices and receive favours from them and then they ascend from
contemplation of their forms to degrees which cannot be described. a al-Jawzi collected what he
considered to be the errors of the Ihya in a book which he called I'ldm al-Ihya b'Ighldl al-Ihya
and also expressed his opinions of al-Ghazali's teaching in his book--Talbis Iblis.4 He quotes al-
Ghazali's statement that the inclination of the Sufis was towards knowledge which was revealed
and not acquired by study, and therefore they did not concern themselves with study nor the
works of human writers, but asserted that the Way gave precedence to self-discipline, in order to
to get rid of evil qualities and to cut off all fetters. They taught the concentration of the concern
upon God, through
cessation of concern with family and wealth and knowledge, and betaking themselves to solitude
for the recollection of God. 1 Ibn Jawzi stoutly defends the pursuit of learning (which alGhazali
never despised, though he reckoned it inferior to the God-given gnosis), and maintains that the
soul, in solitude, is the more subject to Satanic suggestions and its own vain imaginations, and
knowledge is necessary to ward these off. Fasting, vigils, and the waste of time involved in
meditation, Ibn al-Jawzi considers to be contrary to the Canon Law. a
Again, Ibn al-Jawzi takes exception to al-Ghazali's view that listening to music and singing was
permissible, because if listening to a single melodious sound was lawfiul, so also must be
listening to a combination of such sounds (cf. pp. 85 ff. above). Ibn at-Jawzi considers this is a
fallacious argument, pointing out that the string by itself, or the lute without strings, if struck, is
not unlawful, or does it produce music, but if the two are combined and struck in a particular
fashion, that is forbidden. a
Ibn ai-Jawzi expresses his astonishment that al-Ghazali should relate so many stories of the
otherworldliness of the Sufis, their indifference to this world's goods, and the severity of their
asceticism and self-discipline, and not only did he relate these things, but he approved of the
Sufis in such action. " How cheaply has al-Ghazali traded theology for Sufism ! " he exclaims.
Again he says : " Glory be to Him Who withdrew AN! Hamid from the orbit of theology by his
authorship of the Ihya ! Would that he had not related therein such unlawful things. It is amazing
that he should both relate them and express his approval of them and should call the Sufis (lit.
the owners of " states ") his friends : and what state is more vile and more disastrous than that of
one who opposes the Shar' and approves what is opposed to it ? "a In many other passages Ibn al-
Jawzi attacks al-Ghazali in a manner which proves his thorough study of al-Ghazali's teaching
and his indignation that a man of such gifts should have given his support to the Sufis and their
doctrines. He also rebukes
' Ihya, 111, p. j6.

2 Talbls lblts, pp. 345. 346. Cf. also p. 347 $ Ibid., p. 261.
4 Talbis Iblis, pp. 377 ff. 380.
Ibid., p. 176. Cf. p. 186 above.
I Cf. Talbis Iblis, pp. 171 ff, 4 11, Rids, op. £11., p. 32.
' Ibn 1Khaliikan, 11, p. 91.
4
al-Ghazali for his tolerance towards Yazid (cf. pp. 45 ff. above), in his Book of the Refutation of
the Bigot which is directed against one who denies that Yazid should be cursed.'
But al-Ghazali had a much greater influence on those who admired and accepted his teachings. It
is stated that his fatwas, which, in their tolerance and wisdom, reflected his own religious beliefs,
were written down by the Imam Abu'l-Fadl al-Muzaffar al-'Abdi al-Baharani in the year
564/1170, and so were available for the guidance of those who came after him, who had similar
questions to settle. 2 The large number of summaries of the lhya and commentaries upon it,
beginning with his brother Ahmad's Lubab al-1layd which was followed by those of many
traditionalists and theologians, shews the deep impression made by a book still widely read in all
Islamic communities. a
A writer who made a careful study of al-Ghazali's writings and did not hesitate to pass friendly
criticism where necessary, while at the same time admiring his work and defending it against
those who attacked it, was the celebrated Spanish philosopher and mystic Abu Bakr Ibn Tufayl
(ob. 58r/1185). He admits that al-Ghazali, when addressing himself to the general public " bound
in one place and loosed in another and denied certain things and then declared then to be true."
There are many contradictions in his books, Ibn Tufayl points out, and he quotes al-Ghazali's
own justification for such inconsistency, given in the Mizdn at-'Amal, where he says that
opinions are of three kinds : (i) that which is shared with the vulgar and is in accordance with
their view ; (ii) the opinion given to anyone who comes asking for guidance ; (iii) the opinion
which a man keeps to himself, which is not disclosed except to one who himself holds it. 4 Ibn
Tufayl defends al-Ghazali against the attacks of critics such as Ibn Rushd, saying " Some later
writers have read a grave significance into the words that occur at the end of the Mishknt, to the
effect that those
1 Khwansarr, Rau fiat a1-Jannat, p. 182. } Ithaf, p. 18.
• Alist oL such summaries is given by the Sayyid 9lurtada in the Ithaf,
p. 41. Cf. also Sroekiemann, Geschichle dtr :lrabischen Littsratur, 1, p. 42.
Sapp. I, p. 748.
• Iia.'y b. Yagzan, p, q. MI--an al-'Amat, p. 162.
who Attained-to-Union are convinced that the Existent One
can be described by attributes inconsistent with pure Unity, inferring from this that al-Ghazali
asserted that the First Being,
The Reality, Who Alone is worthy to be glorified, admitted of multiplicity in His Essence, which
God forbid."'
al-Ghazali's teaching, in Ibn Tufayl's view, consisted chiefly of symbolic utterances and
allusions, and none could profit thereby, except that one who, in the first place, examined them
by his insight, and used his insight to interpret them, or one especially fitted to understand them,
one possessed of traps= cendental wisdom, for whom a slight allusion was sufficient. Ibn Tufayl
notes that al-Ghazali himself stated that he composed books of esoteric doctrine and had set
down therein the truth undefiled, but these_buoks, Ibn-Tufayl observes, had not reached
Andalusia. Books reputed to contain such doctrine were the Kitab al-Ma'arif al-'Agliyya and the
Kitab al-Nafkh wa't-Taswiya,z but though these books contain symbolic expressions, IbnTufayl
does not think there is much revealed in them beyond what is set forth in those of al-Ghazali's
books meant for the multitude (though Ibn Tufayl might have found indications. of a belief in
emanation, in the former book). a
It is evident that Ibn Tufayl had made the closest study of al-Ghazali's writings, and the theme of
his own famous romance . Hayy b. Yagzan, with its emphasis on the value of-_the 1I-e in
solitude in communion with the Divine, which results in attainment to the Vision of God and the.
knowledge of all things, may well have been influenced by al-Ghazali's teaching on the subject.
Ibn Tufayl closes his book by stating that he has included in it "secret knowledge which can be
received.only by the gnostics in God, and ignored only by those who are heedless of Him-but the
mysteries which we have confided to these pages, we have concealed with a light veil, easily
withdrawn by those fitted to do so, but impenerrable by those who are unworthy of what lies
beyond it," a method of teaching which by his own admission, is characteristically Ghazalian.4
Hay X b. Yagzan, p. 1q.
' Cf. SUras, XV, 2g. XXXII, 8. XXXVIII, 72.
' Hayy h. Yaq;an, p. 14. Cf. p. 107 above. + Hayy b. Yaq;an, p. 1i8.
r'
i
zoo AL-GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING
There is no doubt that al-Ghazall's- teaching- on the mystic Path had a profound influence on the
founders of the Sufi religious orders which were being established in Islam,, in considerable
numbers, from the twelfth century onwards. Among the greatest of these orders was that of the
Qadiriyya, named after 'Abd al-Qadir al-Jilani (ob; 561/n66). As a youth of eighteen, he arrived
at Baghdad in A.R. 488, just after al-Ghazali's resignation, when everyone was asking why he
had given up his post, and this event must have produced a deep effect on the young student.
:Abd al-Qadir studied Sufism in Baghdad and then spent long years in asceticism and self-
discipline until he attained to the mystical experience and the life of the . saints. He then returned
to Jaghdad to accomplish the work to which he felt himself called tnd devoted his time to
preaching,. as al-Ghazali had done before him. In A.H. 52r he was appointed Professor at the
College of Abu Sa'd al-Mubarak and there his followers built a convent for his $fifi novices. He
was responsible for a large number of writings, in which he follows the teaching of al-Ghazali.
His teaching on the Vision, and the distinction between sight (the physical eye, ba$r) and insight'
(the eye of the spirit, ba$ira),'on the visible and invisible worlds, on Love, which he calls " a kind
of intoxication," Gnosis, which he regards as the knowledge of the hidden meaning of things,,
and ecstasy (wajd), when God pours out the cup of His love, for His saints, and so admits them-
to the Garden of Fellowship with Himself, all follows closely that of al-Ghazali on the same
subjects. I
There is a passage in 'Abd al-Qadir's Fuluh al-GIIayb, in which' he writes : "Die to the creatures,
by God's leave, to your
passions, by His command : to your will,.by His act, and you
will then be worthy to be the dwelling-place of the knowledge
if God. The sign of your death to the creatures is that you
detach yourself from them and do not look for anything from
them. The sign that you have died to your passions is that
you cease to seek benefit for yourself, or to ward off injury,
and you are not concerned about yourself, for you have com
-#
i Cf. M. Àll Aini, Abd al-Kadir Guilaal, pp. 169 ff. and Chapters IX, XII above
AL-GHAZALX'S MYSTICAL TEACHING 205
mitted all things unto God. The sign that your will has been
merged in the Divine Will is that you seek nothing of yourself

or for yourself . . . God's will is working in you. Surrender
yourself into the hands of God, like the hall of the polo-player,
who sends it hither and thither with his mallet, or the corpse
in the hands of him who washes it, ... like the child in its
mother's bosom." I He also writes of God's revelation of Himself
in Majesty and Beauty .-and how those to whom He reveals
Himself in His Majesty' and Greatness are filled with fear and
awe, while, those to whom His Beauty is revealed are filled
with radiance and joy, and know themselves to be near unto
Him. 2 The whole of this work shews plainly that it has been
based upon al-Ghazali's writings. a
The Qadiriyya order was -inspired by Jilani's principles and
based its rule of life upon his teaching. The order has three
degrees of initiation that of Islam, for the believers who accept
the " five pillars" of the Faith (the creed, prayer, almsgiving,
fasting and the pilgrimage), that of Iman, for those whose faith includes belief in God, His
angels, the prophets, the sacred books, the Resurrection and predetermination, and that of Iltsan,
for the elect, who pray to God " as if they saw Him with their eyes," or if they do not see Him,
who know that He sees them. This bears a close resemblance to al-Ghazali's three-fold division
of the degrees of faith and the classes of believers. + The Order bases its teaching also on the
Tradition of the Seventy Thousand Veils, between God and the soul, with its implications of the
need of purification, in order that these veils may be rent asunder. a
Another of the great orders obviously influenced by al-Ghazali's teaching was that of the
Rifa'iyya, whose founder, Ahmad al-Rifa'i (ob-.570 /1r82) rived near Basra, a devout ascetic
who, like al-Ghazali, was a great lover of animal life. He has been called the St. Francis of the
dervishes, and by his followers he was regarded as almost Divine. One of his titles at the
z M. al-Thdaff, Qald'id al-Jauahir (margin), pp. 12 ff. r21 ft.

Ibid., p. 23.
Cf. Chapters XI and XII above and p. 169 above. Cf. M. Aiat, op. cil., p. Ig6. ana p. 167
above ' Cf. p. 147 ff, above. J
f
1:
present day is Abu'I-'Awajiz (the Father of the Needy).' His doctrine of the Godhead is very like
that of al-Ghazali and is stated almost in his words " It is wonderful that, whilst I seek, Thou art
with me : and how I see that Thou art at my side. Still more wonderful that I can know Thee.
Infinite, nothing ,limits Thee : incapable of being represented, Thou hast no body : invisible,
Thou bast no form-How know Thee ? In what way to appreciate Thee ? Thou art not present that
I should lay hold upon Thee : Thou art not absent that I should seek Thee. Thou art not without,
that we can attain unto Thee. Thou -art not within, that one has the right to deny Thee . . . since
all finite things subsist by Thee, they-are of necessity near unto Thee : but finite beings have no
relation to Thee in dignity, and they are therefore far from Thee." 2
The Rift' i Shaykh of the present day says to the novice who desires initiation into the Order : "
You are the dead body and I am the washer of the dead.. You are the garden, I the gardener,"
both similes borrowed from al-Ghazali.3 The Rifa'is also teach the doctrine of the Seventy
Thousand Veils and hold that there are four main stages in the task of rending the veils, the Law,
the Way, Knowledge and Reality. The novice has to begin with Repentance and getting rid of the
gross outward sins, the purgative life. He has then to purify the inner self from the vices and to
replace evil by good. His spiritual director tells him' that he must be cast into the flames of
spiritual love ('ishq) so that he may emerge refined, and the fuel of that fire is the constant
recollection of God. So the initiate attains to the death of self (al fans' al-asghar) and he begins to
have the gifts of light and rapture (jadhba), the illuminative life. But he is still a traveller and has
not yet reached the goal of seeing God in all things and all things in relation to himself when he
knows himself to be the mirror of all things, and so lives the unitive life. e
1 Cf. T. Canaan, Mohammedan Saints and Sanctuaries in Palestine, pp. 274,
276.
3 al-Burhan al-mu'ayyad, p. 124, quoted by Carra de Vaux, al•Ghazdlt, p. 251.
Cf. pp. 133, 98 ff. above.
3 Cf. 168, 72, t6t pp. above.
1 Cf. W. H. T. Gairdoer The Moslem World, 1912.
chapters X, XI, XII above and pp. 144 ff. above.
A very important writer on Sufism, also regarded as the founder
of an order, whose writings, concerned largely with the organisa
tion of the Sufi orders, shew very plainly the influence of
aI-Ghazali, was Shihab al-Din Abu Hafs 'Umar al-Suhrawardi
(oh. 632 t1234). He had studied under 'Abd al-Qadir al-Jilani,
while the Persian mystic poet Sa'di was his pupil. He became
famed as a spiritual director and gathered many disciples around
him. In his 'Awarif al-Ma'arif he gives a systematic account
of the Sufi way of life, much of which is derived from al-Ghazali's
Ihya and his other works.
Of the Path he says that the beginning of Sufism is knowledge
and the middle of it is action and the end of it is a gift from
God.' He teaches that the novice requires the guidance of a spiritual director, whose purpose is to
help to purify his heart from vice and to cultivate the virtues, so that the heart may become as a
polished mirror wherein is reflected the splendour of the Divine Glory, and the radiance of the
Divine Beauty may be manifested therein. The perfect Shaykh is the true gnostic, the chosen
saint, and his guidance of the novice is the medicine for the penitent's affliction, for his teaching
brings healing to his soul.2
Suhrawardi's views on Music are evidently derived from those of al-Ghazali• He points out that
music arouses in the heart only what is already there. That one who is inwardly attached to what
is other than God is stirred by music to sensual desire, but he who is inwardly attached to the
love of God, is moved to do His will, He also observes that the spirit responds to the rhythm of
music, because it has an affinity therewith. He divides those who listen to music into three
classes, the common folk who hear with their outward ears only and whose emotions are stirred ;
those who are more advanced on the way, to whom it brings the vision of the grace of God, the
gnostics to whom listening, means, contemplation ; and finally, the spiritually perfect, to whom,
through music, God reveals Himself unveiled." '
'AuArif al-Ma'drif, 1(iya, II (margin), p. 288. Cf. pp, 152 ff above and Rawat at-fdlibtn, p. 145.
2 'Awdrif al-Ma'arif, Ihya, II (margin), pp. 12. 28. Cf, pp. 153 ff above. a Op. cit. Ihyd, II
(margin), pp. 223 ff. Cf. pp. 87 ff. above.
PP. 173 ff. 245 ff. Cf.
Suhrawardi accepts al-Ghazali's cosmological scheme and
frequently refers to the different worlds of experience, the 'dlam
al-mulk wa'l-khalq wa'l-shahdda, which is that of created forms,
and the 'slam al-amr wa'l-malakut, the spiritual world, to which
the heart of man belongs.' He writes also of the human heart
facing two ways, towards the lower self and towards the spirit,
and only the heart which is completely purified faces continually
towards the spiritual. Like al-Ghazali before him, Suhrawardi
thinks of the hindrances, which prevent the soul from finding
God, as veils, and only when these have been rent, can the
soul become the mirror of the Divine Reality and the splendour
of the Divine Glory be manifested therein. 2
Suhrawardi also lays stress on the Divine approach to man,
on the attractive force (jddhib) of the Spirit of God, which
draws the human spirit,-when it is perfectly tranquillised, and
the mirror is so polished that it reflects the Divine radiance
to its true abiding-place, the Invisible World. This attraction
of the human to the Divine, he says, is stronger than that of the
iron to the magnet. Just as the magnet and the iron are mutually
attracted because of their affinity in substance, so also there is
affinity between the Divine and the human spirit which draws them together. 3
Suhrawardi's teaching on Prayer owes a good deal to al-Ghazali and he also quotes the words of
Abu Sa'd al-Kharraz that when entering upon Prayer a man should approach God as he will on
the Day of Resurrection, when he will stand in His Presence, with no mediator between, for he
who prays is face to face with Him to Whom he prays and in confidential talk with Him, and it
should be remembered that He is the King of kings .4 When the pure in heart, says Suhrawardi,
utter the takbir (God is Most Great), they enter into the heavenly places and are preserved from
Satanic suggestions. The hearts of those who seek to draw nigh unto God ascend through the
heavenly spheres and with each sphere to which they ascend, they leave behind them something
of the darkness of the self, until they pass
1Op.cit. 1hyd,TI(margin),pp.17,28,338. IV,p.217. Cf. pp. 16o, 174 above.
' op, cit. Ihyd, II (margin), pp. 261, 334. 26o. Cf. Pp. 157 f1. above. Op. cit. 1Ayd, II (margin), p.
305. Cf. p. 143 above. ` Op. tit. 1hyd, III (margin), pp. 169, 171. Cf. pp. loo, m1 above.
beyond the heavens and stand before the Throne of God, and then all thought of the self passes
away in the radiant light of the Divine Majesty, and the darkness of the self is tinguished in that
pure light, as the darkness of the night' disappears in the light of day.'
The final stage of the way, to Suhrawardi, as to al-Ghazali, is that of tamkin, and those who
attain to it have left the "states" behind them and pierced the veils, and their spirits dwell. in
Essential Light : they are the lovers, enjoying that fellowship (uns) which Dhu 'l-Nun defined as
the lover's joy in the Beloved, which Suhrawardi describes as the rejoicing of the spirit inn the
perfection of the Divine Beauty. They have returned to their Source, they have found that which
they sought (hagq ai-yargn), and, having passed away from self into God, have attained to the
unitive life in Him (ittisal).2
But the greatest among those who were influenced by al-Ghazali was the Spanish mystic Muhyi
al-Din Ibn al-'Arabi, " al-Sliaykh al-Akbar," who was born at Murcia, in Spain, in 560l1164. He
lived for some thirty years at Seville, then a centre of Spanish Sufism, and there he first studied
its teaching. He then travelled eastwards, visiting Egypt, Syria, Baghdad, Aleppo, and Asia
Minor. He settled finally in Damascus, where he died in 638/1240. His travels brought him into
contact with the chief Sufis of his time and his study of al-Ghazali's writings is proved by his
expressed admiration for the earlier mystic, whom he calls one of the leaders of the Sufi Way,
possessing a knowledge belonging only to the elect among the Sufis, one able to explain both the
name and the named, for whom God had drawn aside the veil, that he might look upon the World
Invisible.' '
In his Kitab al-Ajwiba Ibn al-'Arabi gives his doctrine of the Godhead : " He is, and there is with
Him no after nor before, nor above nor below, nor far nor near, nor union nor division, nor how
nor where nor place. He is now as He was. He is the One without oneness and the Single without
singleness. .
1 Op. cit. lhvd, III (margin), v. 218. Cf. pp. 165, ico above.
2 Op. cit. Iliyd, IV (margin), pp. 407. 307.367.369 ff. Cf. pp, loi, i9o above.
' Cf. lthiif, p. 1o. Munawi, fol. ig5a.
f
zta AL-GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING
He is the very existence of the First and the very existence
of the Last and the very existence of the Outward and the
very existence of the Inward. So that there is no first nor last
nor outward nor inward except Him, without those becoming
Him or His becoming them He is not in a thing, nor a thing in Him, whether entering in or
proceeding forth. It is necessary that thou know Him, after this fashion, not by learning ('ihn) nor
by intellect, nor by understanding, nor by imagination, nor by sense,_ nor by the. outward eye,
nor by the inward eye nor by perception. By Himself he sees Himself and by Himself He knows
Himself. . . . His Veil (i.e., phenomenal existence) is (only) the concealment of His existence in
His oneness, with
out any qualityThere is no other and there is no existence to other, than He. .. He whom thou
thinkest to be other than God, he is not other than God, but thou dost not know Him and dost not
understand that thou seest Him," Nature, he- says, is nothing else than the " breath of God "
indwelling forms higher and lower, which are manifest as phenomena. His relation to the world
is that of the spirit to the body. But he adds, " He is still Ruler as well as ruled and is still Creator
as well as created. He is now as He was as to His creative power and as to His sovereignty, not
requiring a creature nor a subject. . . . When He called into being the things that are He was
(already) endowed with all attributes, and He is now as He was then. In His oneness there is no
difference between what is recent and what is original : the recent is the result of His manifesting
Himself and the original is the result of His remaining within Himself." 1 There is a striking
resemblance in this passage to al-Ghazali's declaration of the Nature of the Godhead, in his
emphasis on the Divine Self-Sufficiency, and his statement that He is as He always was and the
creation was but the shewing forth of His glory, and in his interpretation of the terms First and
Last as applied to the Godhead. 2
Again Ibn al-'Arabi writes : " There is no existence save His existence. To this the Prophet
pointed when he said : "Revile not the world, for God is the world," pointing to the fact that
' Ki1ib al-Ajwiba, pp. 8zo, 813, 817. Cf. Fu;u$ al-Hiham, pp. 271, 116. 2 Cf. Ik)' , I, PP. 79 ff.
IV, pp. 217 ff. and pp. 133. 138 above,
the existence of the world is God's existence without partner or like or equal. It is related that the
Prophet declared that God said to Moses : " 0 my servant, I was sick and thou didst not visit Me.
I begged of thee and thou gayest not to Me," with other like expressions, pointing to the fact that
the existence of the beggar is His existence and the existence of the sick is His existence. And
when this is allowed it is allowed that this existence is His existence and that the existence of all
created things, both accidents and substances, is His existence. And when the secret of an atom
of the atoms is clear, the secret of all created things, both outward and inward is clear, and thou
dost not see in this world or the next, aught beside God, but the existence of these two Abodes
and their name and their named, all, of them, are He without doubt and without wavering." 1 al-
Ghazalf had already stated his view that the sum total of the visible and invisible worlds were to
be regarded as the 'Divine Presence " which encompasses all existent things, since there is
nothing existent, save God and His works and His servants, who are His handiwork," and again
he had written that there was nothing co-existent with God, apart from Him, for everything
subsists through Him. s The traditions attributed by Ibn al-'Arabi to Moses were also quoted by
al-Ghazali, who adds the words of the Lord: " If thou hadst visited My servant, thou wouldest
have found Me with him," 3 and it would seem that Ibn al-'Arabi has taken this from al-Ghazali.
But in Ibn al-'Arabi s teaching al-Ghazali's panentheism is developed inter an unmistakable
pantheistic monism.
In his teaching,on the mystic's realisation of his oneness with the Divine, and' tFe Sufi " union,"
Ibn al-'Arabi writes " When this secret is revealed to thee, thou understandest that thou art not
what is other than God . . . and that thou hast continued and wilt continue without when and
without times.
. And thou seest all thine actions to be His actions and all thine attributes to be His-attributes and
thine essence to be His essence, without thy becoming Him or His becoming thee, either in the
greatest or least degree. " Everything is perishing
I Kildb al-Ajwiba, p. 815.
• Cf. pp. 191, 192 above.
Ir
212 AL-GHAzALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING
except His Face,"' -that is, there is nothing except His Face, then whithersoever ye turn, there is
the Face of God." 2 Later in the aloe treatise he writes : "Just as he who dies the death of the
body loses all his qualities, both praiseworthy and blameworthy, so in the spiritual death, all
qualities both praiseworthy and blameworthy, are cut off and God comes into his place in all his
states. Thus, instead of his own essence, comes the essence of God, and in place of his attributes,
come the attributes of God. He who knows himself sees his whole existence to be His existence
and does not see any change take place in his own essence or attributes. For when thou ' knowest
thyself' thine egoism is-faken away and thou knowest that thou art not other than God." a This
comes very near to al-Ghazali's description of the re-union of those-who--attain ., (al-wdsilun)
with the One, given in the Mishkat, which might well be the source of Ibn al-'Arabi's teaching in
the_ passages quoted, in which even the wording follows al-Ghazali.4
Ibn al-'Arabi's mystical psychology and his theory of knowledge, together with his views on the
"inner eye" and on dreams, bear the closest resemblance to those of al-Ghazali,
so much so that it has been possible for more than one: student
of Ibn al-'Arabs to attribute to the later mystic what is actually
the Work of the earlier writer. e
In his teaching on Love and Beauty Ibn aI-'Arabi also followed
al-Ghazali in holding that the object of natural love is self
satisfaction, which subordinates the object. of • love --to itself,
while in spiritual love the self and its desires are subordinated
to the Beloved. He also holds that the cause of all love is
Beauty and it is as, Beauty that the gnostic knows Him and
' Sara xxviiI, 88. * Sura, II, log.
s Kitab al-Ajwiba, p. 816.
Cf. Mishkat al-Auwar, pp. 113, 115, 118, 144. 145
' Cf. A. E. AlfiS, Tha Mystical Philosophy of M. al-D. Ibis at-'A rabi, pp. 93, 103, 106 ff,pp . 115
ff. and al-Gha9Qf, al-Risalat al-Laduniyys, pp. 27, 39 fl. Baron Carra de Vaux, Professor Asin
Palacios and Dr. Af fi have all accepted as the work of Ibn al-'Arabi the Risela ft Ma'na al-nafs -
wa'l-Rah, which consilts of al-Ghazdll's Risaln with a few additions and some omissions : these
scholars have found -al-Ghaialrs'teaching so similar to that of Ibn al'Arabl that they have been
able to accept it as that of the Spanish mystic. It is to be noted that the teaching of al-Ghazali's
Risala is found in part also in the Ihyd and other works and that the work is his seems beyond
doubt. Cf. my translation, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, April, 1938, pp. 177 fl.
AL-GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL, TEACHING 213
loves Him. On this subject Ibn al-'Arabs has obviously based his teaching on al-Ghazali's Book
of Love.'
Ibn al-'Arabs is a trinitarian, in the Plotinian sense and expressly accepts the -idea of triplicity
(tathlith) as that upon which Reality is based. Like al-Ghazali, he accepts the Plotinian
conception of the Absolute One, Universal Mind and Universal Soul. al-Ghazali's teaching that
man is made in the image of God and as such can be invested with the Divine attributes' is
developed by Ibn al-'Arabi into the doctrine of the Perfect Man" who has fully realised his
oneness with his Divine Source, and so Being, by him, is considered as having three degrees or
phases, those of Pure Being, the Perfect Man (the expression of Universal Mind), and the
Phenomenal World (the expression of Universal Soul), and these correspond to al-Ghazali's
classification of the three worlds, that of Malakut, the spiritual, invisible world, that of Jabarut
partaking of both the eternal and the temporal, and that of Mulk and Shahdda, this material,
phenomenal world.'
In his Tarjuman al-Ashwdq Ibn al-'Arabs describes the journey of the pilgrims through the dark
night of bodily existence. the Purgative way, until they reach the region of the Heavenly Court
(cf. P. 159 above) the Illuminative way. Gnosis of God is inspired only by Love and love means
the annihilation of the lover and the lover's attributes : he becomes one in essence with the
Beloved and vanishes in Him from himself, the Unitive life. s
While Ibn al-'Arabi is the most important of the mystics influenced by al-Ghazali, there were
others after him whose admiration of al-Ghazali's work led them to base much of their teaching
upon his. Among these was Abu'l-Hasan al-Shadhili (ob. 656/1258), a native of Tunisia, who
spent much of his life wandering from place to place, giving himself to meditation and
contemplation. He based his teaching admittedly on the
1 Futahat, pp. 426, 431, 441, Fulaf, p. 154. Cf. pp. 175 ff. above.
• Fusas, p. 293. Cf. pp. 142 ff. above.
For a full treatment of this doctrine cf. R. A. Nicholson, Studies in Islamic Mysticism, pp. 97 ff.
• Cf. pp. 159, 174 above.
s Tarjumin al-Ashwaq XXIII, r. XLVI, i. XXVII, 1. Cf. also Fuaii.s. p. 186 and pp. 192 S. above.
r
f
M
Ihya, and taught his disciples to devote their lives entirely to the service of God and to seek fans'
as the goal of their quest. His importance in extending the influence of al-Ghazali is due to the
fact that he founded the order of the Shadhiliyya, a Sufi fraternity which is still very influential in
North Africa, especially Morocco, Tunis and Egypt, and is represented also in Syria and the
Hijaz.1
Another writer who studied the work of al-Ghazali and spread his fame abroad was 'Afif al-Din
Yafi'i (ob. 768 /1367) a Shafi'ite, deeply interested in Sufism and the Sufis. A native of Yemen,
he travelled to Jerusalem, Damascus and Cairo, became a Sufi and devoted most of his writings
to mysticism. He regarded al-Ghazali as one of the greatest of Imams, to whom the giving of
judicial decisions became easier than drinking water. The Ihya Yafi'i considered to be the most
precious of books and he commends its literary style. al-Ghazali's memory, he held, was
perpetuated by his writings and he notes that students and writers were agreed that no one after
him had left anything to equal his work. Yafi'i wrote a Qasida in eulogy of al-Ghazali and his
work. " The Ihya 'Ulum al-Din, starlike," he writes, " has arisen from the depths of the
knowledge of one who sought for light and found it. Abu I:iamid was a spinner (ghazzal) who
spun a fine thread out of knowledge, not spun by a spindle. He was called The Proof of Islam
and undoubtedly was worthy of the name, absolutely trustworthy (in respect of the Faith) How
many an epitome (has he given) us setting forth the basic principles of religion : how much that
was repetitive has he summarised, and epitomised what was lengthy. How many a simple
explanation has he given us of what was hard to fathom, with brief elucidation and clear solution
of knotty problems. He used moderation, being quiet but decisive in silencing an adversary,
though his words were like a sharp sword-thrust in refuting a slanderer and protecting the high-
road of guidance. In thrust and parry he was foremost, like a hero in, battle, upheld by his virtue.
The hum of his spinning-wheel reached to the heavens, so that Muhammad looked with favour
upon him and boasted of him to Jesus, as one illustrious in gifts,
3 Cf. Ithaf, PP. 10, 27.
eloquent in speech, profound in learning." Yafi'i felt that no other writer was his equal for
literary style and significance of content, nor was his equal likely to be found " as long as the
earth and the heavens endure'" : furthermore, his sources were authoritative and reliable. Yafi'i
adds that the later Sufis depended upon al-Ghazali and made him their authority.'
A contemporary of Yafi'i, who also admired al-Ghazali and did what he could to give others a
knowledge of his teaching, was the lawyer Taj al-Din al-Subki (ob. 7711 /1370), who held
positions as Professor, Mufti, and Qadi, in Damascus and Cairo, where he was Khatib of the
Umayyad Mosque. As a Shafr'ite he devotes much attention to this distinguished adherent of his
own school of thought. Asked his opinion of al-Ghazali, he replied : " What can a man say ? for
his achievements and his fame have covered the earth and he who really knows his teaching
knows that it goes beyond his fame." s He describes al-Ghazali as the " Highway of Religion,
whereby men may be enabled to reach the Abode of Peace." He was a lion, except that in his
presence the lion would cower and hide himself, a perfect full-moon, except that his guidance
shone by day, and a preacher, able to edify. He taught at a time when people had more need of
the truth, than darkness has of the light of the heavens and the barren land of the fruitful rain."
He did not cease to defend the true faith," says al-Subki, " with his persuasive words. and to
protect the sanctuary of religion, and to dip the tip of his arrow in the blood of the arrogant, until
he had established the Faith securely and shewn plainly what was contrary to it." For the benefit
of his readers, al-Subki gives a considerable number of the fatwas and sayings of al-Ghazali,
whom he regarded not only as one of the greatest of Imams, but as a seer of whom he says : " if
there had been a prophet after Muhammad, it surely would have been al-Ghazali." Of the Ihya he
says that it is one of the books which Muslims ought to study and to recommend to others, so
that as many as possible may be enabled to follow its guidance and he adds that there are few
who reflect upon it who do not find some word of counsel and help in it forthwith. 3
1 Mir Ct al- janati, fols. 257a, 258b. 1 I thaf, p. to.
Tabagat al-Shafi'iyya al-hubra, IV, pp. ioi, 102. M. RidA, op. cit., p. 27.
wI
zr6 AL-GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING
A traditionist -who gave his time to the extension of al-Ghazali's influence by making his work
more widely known was Zayn
al-Din b. al-Husayn al-'Iraqi (ob. 8o6/1404). who travelled in
Egypt, Syria and the Hijaz and spent three years as Qacli in Medina. He taught for some time in
Cairo. 'Iraqi regarded the Ihya as one of the greatest books of Islam, in its analysis of what was
lawful and unlawful for the true Muslim, and in its reconciliation of orthodox religion with the
mystical doctrine of the Sufis. al-Ghazali, he says, does not limit himself to what arises out of
religious belief (al furu') I and problems of conduct, but he does not "plunge into a fathomless
sea" whence it would be impossible to return to the shore. He combines both exoteric and
esoteric knowledge in his work, and gives due weight to the deepest significance of both. 'Iraqi
considers al-Ghazali's literary. style to be most felicitous, but never extravagant. He follows the
Via media, in accordance with 'Ali s saying : " The best of this community are those who follow
the middle course (al-namal al-awsat)-the laggard overtakes them and the fanatic returns to
them." 'Iraqi edited and made a collection of the traditions contained in the Ihya, the rough draft
of which he completed in A.H. 751 and the fair copy in A.H. 790. This Takhrij is appended to
the bestknown modern text of the Ihya. 2
One of the last of the great Sufi writers to be influenced by al-Ghazali was the Egyptian 'Abd al-
Wahhab al-Shar'ani (called also Sha'rawi) al-Shafr'i al-Misri (ob. 973 /1585) a a member of the
Shadhiliyya order and therefore naturally attracted towards al-Ghazali's teaching. He wrote a
considerable number of books on mysticism and has something to say of al-Ghazali,' and it is
evident that he followed in al-Ghazali's steps in much of his teaching and conduct, e.g., in his
consideration for animals, s and his view that the good life was one of service to others,
1 at-Sarrll defines these as discipline, morals, spiritual stations and states and acts and deeds.
Kitdb at-Lama; p. 410
1 Cf. the Cairo edition A.H. 1272 (reprint 1340), 1, p. 2. Cf. also DI. Rida,
p. 28.
r Cf. my article al-Sha'rdni the Mystic. The Moslem World, July, 1939.
Cf. Ithaf, p. 9.
6 Mfzdn al-Sha'ranr, pp. XXIX, XXXVIII. Lafa'if al-Minau, p. z1. Cf. pp. 49 ff. above.
a life productive of good for the Faith and for society. He, too,
teaches that the saint is possessed of an inner eye and that when his spiritual understanding is
enlightened, he comprehends all mysteries and by the light of.gnosis can contemplate the
Unseen.' Like al-Ghazali, he holds that this "knowledge from on high" breaks in suddenly upon
those to whom God gives it, who have surrendered themselves wholly unto Him, and such He
chooses to be His saints, to be in constant communion with Himself." These are they who,
having ascended ever higher and higher, enter the unitive life, dead unto self, but alive in God
and in constant contemplation of the glory which has been revealed unto them3
a
al-Ghazali's influence, therefore, made itself felt, throughout the length and breadth of Islam and
affected orthodox and Sufi writers alike, so that his books have been-and still are--read and
studied from West Africa to Oceania.
But it was not only within Islam that his teaching was studied and accepted and made a rule of
life to be followed. Those of other faiths, both in East and West, found much in his writings to be
admired and much of his teaching on the mystic Way, which could be adopted by mystics who
owed no allegiance to Islam.
Upon mediaeval Jewish thought al-Ghazali had a considerable influence, since his ethical
teaching was of a standard and a type which closely resembled that of Judaism, and his works
were carefully studied by Jewish scholars, not only those writings dealing with philosophy,
which aroused wide-spread interest and discussion in Jewish circles, being studied by
Alaimonides among others, but his mystical works also, and within a century of his death,
Hebrew and Latin translations of his works appeared, e.g., his philosophical works were
translated into Latin by Avendeath (Ibn Da'fid c. 1090 to c. 1165) of Toledo, a converted Jew
working in conjunction with Dominic Gundisalvus, Archdeacon of Segovia, and his hl'izan al-
'Aural was translated in the thirteenth century by Abraham Ibn Hasdai of Barcelona, who did
much work in translating from Arabic
' Lrwdgih al-dnuar, pp. 67. Cf. pp- 143 ff. above.
2 Ibid. p. 9. Cf. pp. 199 ff. above.
I .41-Anwar al-Qudsiyva (margin), p. 22. Cf. pp. 206 ff. above.
218 AL-GHAZALY'S MYSTICAL TEACHING
to Hebrew. The Miskkdi al-Anwdr also aroused great interest among Jewish thinkers. It was
translated by Isaac Alfasi,' and quoted by the sixteenth century writer Moses Ibn Habib, a native
of Lisbon, who was himself a poet, translator, and philosopher.
Jewish writers, e.g., Johanan Alemanus also found a likeness between the order and gradation of
the lights which are derived from the Light Supernal and the theory of lights found in the
Qabbalah. In the Zohar, a Jewish mystical treatise, compiled from many sources, which appeared
in Spain in the thirteenth century, A.D., it is stated that " all the heavenly lights are illumined
from One and depend on One and all the lights there form only one Light and desire never to be
separated, and he who does separate them in his mind is as though he separated himself from life
eternal." The Qabbalic doctrine conceived of the ten Sefirat or spiritual agencies as all
manifesting the same Divine Light : the lowest triad corresponding to the Lights Terrestrial and
the second triad to the Lights Celestial, while above all, is the Essential Light. The grouping of
the SefirOt, of which the three highest represent the intelligible world of creative ideas, the
second the moral world of creative formation, and the third the material world of creative matter,
correspond, in some measure, to al-Ghazali's 'dlam al-Malakut, the 'dlam
al-Jabarut, and the 'dlam al-hulk wa'l-Shahdda.2 In one of
his works he writes definitely of ten emanations from the One, of which the tenth is man.3
The Zoharic theory of the soul also resembles closely that of al-Ghazali. " When the Holy One
created man, He made him on the supernal pattern and breathed into him a holy breath consisting
of a triad whose several names are nephesh (nafs), ruah (rich), and neshamah (nasdma), the last
being the highest, for it is the superior energy by means of which man can apprehend and keep
the commandments of the Holy One. For these three aspects of the soul are all one, being merged
one in the other on the pattern of the supernal mystery." 4 This
I Descendant of a Spanish family, who was living in Adrianople in the

sixteenth century.
' Cf. Zohar, IV, p. no and Arishhai, pp. ito, ff. and pp. 139 ff. above.
at-nra'drif al-'Agtrvya, fol. 8a. - ' Zohar, IV, p. 3116.
latter corresponds to al-Ghazali s conception of the rational soul " and the " soul at rest " and the
" heart." 1
al-Ghazali's teaching also had its influence upon Christian writers in the Middle Ages and one of
the earliest of these to make a close study of his work and to make it the basis of his own
mystical teaching was the Jacobite Christian YuhannA Abu'lFaraj Barhebraeus, known also as
Gregorius, the son of a Jewish father. Born at Melatia in Asia Minor in A.D. 1226 he became a
monk and seems to have studied under Muslim teachers during a period of residence in Tripoli.
He wrote Arabic as fluently as Syriac and had also some knowledge of Persian. He became
successively Bishop of Guba, Lakaba and Aleppo and died in Persia in A.D. 1286. He spent
some time in Baghdad, where, no doubt, he came into contact with al-Ghazali's work, and he
made it his business to render Muslim thought accessible to the Syrians. The extent of his
dependence upon al-Ghazali in two of his mystical works, The Book of the Dove and the
Etkikon has already been fully analysed, a In his teaching on the inner life, on the progress of the
seeker towards spiritual perfection, on gnosis and its relation to the love of God, as well as in his
views on music and its spiritual value, Barhebraeus follows al-Ghazali very closely and quotes
frequently from the Ikyd. It seems probable, too, that he was acquainted with the Mizan al-'Anal,
and this is likely enough, since it was well-known to Jewish circles,-and certain of his
expressions suggest an acquaintance also with al-Ghazili's
al-Risdlat al-Laduniyya3 and the Kimiyd al-Sa'dda.4
But it was not only in the East that al-Ghazali's work bore fruit in the writings of Christian
mystics , his influence made itself felt also in the West, where, in Italy and Spain, Christian and
Muslim thought came into close contact. The Crusades had a considerable effect in spreading the
knowledge of Islamic culture and literature and both Arab and Jewish ideas were gaining ground
in the universities of the Nest, from the twelfth century onwards, In the thirteenth century
Frederick II
I Cf. al-Risdlal at-Ladunipy'a, pp. 26, 27, 3i. Cf. pp. '4' ff. above, 2 Cf. A. J. wensinck, Book of
lke Dove, pp. CXI. if. I Ibid., P. 74 (No. 71, 72), al-Risdlat a1-Lad! niv3'a, p. 31.
' Cf, Book of Eke Dove, Chap. IV, ix and KinLiyd, p. 16.
founded the University of Naples, and encouraged a spirit of free inquiry by welcoming both
Arab and Jewish scholars to his court : and their intellectual influence made itself felt at Palermo
and Salerno as well as Naples. Arabic, in addition to Latin and Greek, was recognised for legal
purposes, and in the vernacular form was in constant use among the people in Sicily, which after
a hundred and thirty years of Islam, had come under Christian rule by the Norman conquest, in
1051, and Christian scholars gave themselves to the study and translation of Arabic writings.
Toledo, coming under Christian rule once more, in 10$5, yet continued to be a centre of Islamic
learning, and the Archbishop Raymond (1130-1150) established a school for the translation of
Arabic writings into Latin. It was at Toledo, also, that a School of Oriental Studies was started in
1250, and Arabic became a subject of study not only in Southern, but Northern Europe. There
can be no doubt that al-Ghazali's works would be among the first to attract the attention of these
European scholars. It has now been fully realised that Christian scholasticism and mediaeval
Christian mysticism derived certain conceptions from Muslim writers, among whom al-Ghazali
was included.'
The greatest of these Christian writers who was influenced by al-Ghazali was St. Thomas
Aquinas (1225-1274), who made a study of the Arabic writers and admitted his indebtedness to
them. 2 He studied at the University of Naples, where the influence of Arabic literature and
culture was predominant at the time.
In reference to the inability of the creature to realise the Majesty of the Creator, St. Thomas uses
the very words of al-Ghazali in saying that " the sun, though supremely visible, cannot be seen
by the bat, because of its excess of light." 3 Again, in dealing with the spiritual aspiration of the
human soul, due to its affinity with the Divine, St. Thomas states that the ultimate perfection of
the rational creature is to be found in that which is the principle of its being, since a thing
I Cf. the work of 1I. Asin Palacios, Bruno Nardi and Dr. A. Guillaume. 2 Summa Theol. Suppl.
Part III, Q. 92, A. x. 3 Sununn Theo1. Part I. Q. XII. Art x. Cf. P. 138 above.
is perfect in so far as it attains to that principle. God is the greatest of all goods and He alone is
true perfection, and St. Thomas holds that He is the end towards which all things move, in order
to achieve the perfection which can be given by Him alone, which is to become like Him. Man
must find out wherein his own perfection consists and then seek to pursue it. He was not created
simply for sensual satisfaction, for this is common to both man and the brutes, nor for the pursuit
of material ends, for man shares the nature of the angels as well as the brutes. This argument is
set forth by al-Ghazali, in almost the same terms, in his Kimiya al-Sa'ada and elsewhere. I
St. Thomas teaches that in this life God can be seen mirrored in His works, by consideration of
which we can in the firs: place see something of the Divine wisdom. Then, in the second place,
this consideration leads to a recognition of God's power and so the human heart is led to
reverence before Him. Thirdly, it leads man to a love of God's goodness. His conclusion is that
the goodness and perfection found in individual things is all united in the One Who is the
Fountain of all goodness. If, therefore, man loves goodness, beauty and attraction in created
things, then the very Fountain of goodness, their Creator, must influence men's minds and draw
them to Himself, 2 This is the theme of al-Ghazali'sHiknaal fiMakhlugal Allah and is empha-
sised again in the Ihyd, where he shews that all the causes of love are found in God, the Giver of
every good and perfect
gift. 3
But it is in his teaching on the Beatific Vision and the gnosis which leads to it that St. Thomas
seems to have derived most from the teaching of the Muslim mystics and especially al-Ghaaali.
The goal which man seeks, St, Thomas states, is the contemplation of Truth, for this is
appropriate to his nature and no other earthly creature shares it with him. There is no end beyond
it, for such contemplation is an end in itself.,' " It is impossible for any created intellect to
comprehend God," writes St. Thomas,
1 Suuuna Theol. Part I. Q. XII. A. x. Part II, Q. x. A. i. Q. 11. A. r. Q. II. A. 5, 6. Contra Gen. III,
2, 22, 24, 25, 27. Cf, pp. 150 ff. above and at-Risalat al-Laduniy;ea, and 11,hya, IV, p. 226.
s Contra Geu. II, 2.
' Cf. Pp 142 ff, pp. x7J ff. above and .l y-&, II', p. 355,
Con. Gcn. III, 37.
s
and again : "We have a more perfect knowledge of God by grace than by natural reason.'" This
grace, by which man understands God, is the gnosis which al-Ghazali calls " knowledge from on
high " (al-'ilm al-laduni). In order to see the Vision of God, St. Thomas holds that the created
intellect needs to be raised " by some kind of outpouring of the Divine grace," the disposition by
which the created intellect is raised to the Beatific Vision is rightly called the light of glory
(lumengloriae), and those who are raised to this rank know all things and the whole order of the
universe, for this light is a likeness of the Divine intellect (cf. pp. 145 ff. above).2 This is the uiir
Allah, which God
casts " into the heart, " that which is attained without mediation between the soul and its
Creator," wrote al-Ghazali, " the radiance from the Lamp of the Invisible shed upon the heart
which is pure and at leisure." a
The contemplation of the Divine Vision, St. Thomas believes, will be perfected in the life to
come, but even now, that contemplation gives us a foretaste of beatitude which begins here and
will be continued in the life to come. The Vision is only for those who love and know God. "He
who possesses more love will see God the more perfectly and will be the more beatified." So the
bliss of Paradise will be in proportion to the intensity of the love for God, as this love will be in
proportion to the knowledge of God gained by His saints on earth and called, by Revelation,
faith. The joy of contemplation consists not only in the contemplation itself, but in the love of
Him Who is contemplated. " In both respects," writes St. Thomas, " the delight thereof surpasses
all human delight, both because spiritual delight is greater than sensual pleasure . . . and because
the love of God surpasses all other love." It is the ultimate perfection of contemplation that the
Truth be not only seen, but loved. It is by the Vision that man is made a partaker of Eternal life.'
This is the doctrine of al-Ghazali concerning the Vision, and is given almost in his words, for he
writes : " The joy. of
Sum. Theol. Part I. Q. XII. Arts. 7,-r3.
• Con. Gen., 111, 53, 59.
• al-Risdlat al-Laduniyya, P. 43. Cf. p. 185 above.
• Sum. Theol. Q. CLXXX. Arts. 4, 7. Sum Gen. III, 59.
Paradise is in proportion to the love of God and the love of God is proportionate to the
knowledge of Him, and so the source of that joy is the gnosis revealed through Faith," and fie,
too states that the joy of the Vision surpasses all sensual joys'
Among Christian writers who made a special study of Islamic teaching and made use of it in
their own writings was the Dominican Raymond Martin (or Marti), a-Catalonian, who lived for a
considerable time in Barcelona and died some time after 1284. He was chosen out to study
Oriental languages, for the purpose of missionary work among Muslims and Jews. In his
Explanatio Sifuboli and his Pugio Fidei he quotes from al-Ghazali's lllagasid al-Falasifa, his Ihya
and his lllizan al-'Amal, in each case to skew how al-Ghazali affirms that the joy of knowing
God and of contemplating Him face to face is the most glorious and excellent of all joys. In his
description of the ultimate Beatitude, he refers to the chapter in the Mizdn, where al-Ghazali
states that the true beatitude is the final state of the Blessed. Comparing it with other forms of
happiness, al-Ghazali points out that wealth in the form of dirhams and dinars, even though they
may serve to satisfy all needs, are but as pebbles beside it. The good, he writes, can be divided
into the beneficial, the beautiful and the enjoyable, but these qualities, when related to earthly
goods, are transient and shared with the lower creation, but the Beatitude of God's elect is a
spiritual thing, abiding, unchangeable, a joy for ever, for it consists in the Presence of the Eternal
and the contemplation of His everlasting glory, Raymond Martin, therefore, takes al-Ghazali,
among other Muslim writers, as his authority for the view that tie joy of the Hereafter is a purely
spiritual joy, and as such, above all densual joys. 2
Another great Christian media:val mystic; whose writings shew evidence of al-Ghazali's
influence, lcas;.D.nte Alighieri
r Cf. 1hyd, IV, pp. 267 ft. and also pp, r88 ff. above, did The Legacy of Islam, pp, 270 ff.
r Explanat'o Simboli (Anuari del Institut d'estudis catalans. March, ioro), p. 54- Ile had also
studied the Alungidh and other works. Cf. Pugio Fidri, Part I. Cap. I., par. iv, par. v, par. vii.
Cap. II., par x. Cap. 1'., par I. Cap, XT, par. i. Cep, XII, par. xi, etc. Cf. lAva, II', p. 265, and
,llfcdn a!'.4 am', pp. go ff,, and pp, 88 ff. above.
224 AL-GHAZALI'S -MYSTICAL TEACHING
(x265-1321), who admits his indQbtedness to the Muslim thinkers and quotes al-Ghazali as one
of his sources.,
The ascent through the Seven Heavens, where the Blessed dwell, in accordance with their
spiritual merits, described in the Paradiso, has been recognised as derived from Muslim legends
of the Prophet's Ascent to Heaven 2 and al-Ghazali gives a version of it in which the guardian
angels ascend through the Seven Heavens, bearing the good deeds of believers, none of which
are acceptable to God, unless done for His sake alone. s Dante, like al-Ghazali before him, holds
that goodness arouses love and the greater the goodness and perfection, the greater the love,
therefore that " Essence which is such that all good found outside of it is only a light from its
own ray, draws to itself more than any other the movement of the mind, in love, of that one who
realises the truth of this." e
The conception of the Beatific Vision and the means whereby it may be attained in some
measure even in this life, an attainment which will be perfected in the life to come, as we have
seen above, was derived, at least in part, from Muslim conceptions, by St. Thomas Aquinas, and
there is little doubt that his sources were also available to Dante. To the latter the Vision is Light,
the Divine Essence is conceived of as a living Light, going forth in creation, kindling the lower
lights from its own radiance, a Divine sun " which kindled all and each." Looking upon that
Divine Light man enters therewith into the Divine life also. In that Light man becomes such that
he cannot turn thence to any other sight. For the good which he seeks is therein wholly
concentrated and therein is perfect all that outside is defective. That is the Light Eternal, in
contemplating which the human soul enters into eternal life, s It is al-Ghazali's conception of
God as the Light Supernal, from Whom Light is radiated to all other things, which kindles the
Lights Celestial and the Lights Terrestrial, which are lit by that Light. as the lamp is lit by fire,
for He is Essential Light.
Cf. Corrrito, Ii, I4, IV, 21.
9 Cf. 1f. Asin Palacios,-Islam and the Divine Comedy, pp. 3 ff.
• Cf. 1hyr. III, pp. 255, 256, and pp. rto ff. above.
• I';trarhso, Canto XXVI, 28, 36.- Cf. pp. 178 ff. above.
• Paradiso, XIII, 52 ff. XXIII, 2S-3o. XX;XIII, 10" .r.s.
Elemental Fire. The Vision, for those who attain, is the contemplation of that Light and those
who look upon it, pass away into it. ,
A much later writer in whom the influence of al-Ghazali has been found was the French mystic
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662) and his knowledge of the Muslim mystic's teaching no doubt came to
him through his study of Raymond Martin's Pugio Fidei which came into his hands in a French
edition, towards the end of his life, when he was writing his Pensees, and it is to be noted that
Raymond Martin cites his Arabic authorities in Latin and gives the title of the books quoted."
Pascal holds that there are three ways of believing ; reason, custom and inspiration. Reason
opens the mind to the truths of religion, and custom brings them home to men, but he holds that
it is necessary, by humiliation, to invite inspiration, which alone can bring about a sure and
lasting result. It is the heart which is conscious of God and can have a direct. experience of Him,
not the reason. 3 His faith in intuition recalls al-Ghazali's belief in the superioity of gnosis to
reason. Reason; says Pascal, moves slowly and is for ever falling asleep or going astray, but
intuition acts in a flash and is always ready to act. So men should put their trust in it, for it means
assurance. 4 . This is the gnosis which comes, says al-Ghazali, like a flash of lightning, but leads
to certainty (yagin).6
Pascal's famous wager for and against belief in Gods contains teaching and arguments which are
also to be found in al-Ghazali. Pascal held that to wager for the existence of. God resulted, if it
were true, in infinite gain, and if untrue, in no loss, To
wager against the existence of God, if He exists, means infinite
loss, and if He does not exist, neither loss nor gain. Al-Ghazali
had propounded the same alternatives. He gives as an illus
tration that if a man is hungry, and food is at hand, which he is
r .lishhdt al-,4n,tdr, pp. 110, 111, 117, 144. s Cf. St. Cyres, Pascal, p. 356.
• Peasdes, 245, 278. Cf. ;,lungidh, p. 23. Ihyd, IC, p. 212.
• Pens. 252, Cf. also Pe7IS. 282.
• al-Risdlat al-L adaniyya, p. 42. Cf. pp. 171, 172 above and Chapter XII
above.
• Pens. 233. M. Asin Palacios has written a work entitled Los precedcntes
mrlsuhnanes del " Part " de Pascal, Santander, 1g-2o, to which I have not been
able to refer.
w
zzb AL-GHAZALV'S MYSTICAL TEACHING
anxious to eat, and a boy tells him that it is poisoned, and a snake has licked it, the man will
endure hunger rather than run the risk of eating it. He says to himself that if the boy is lying, he
has only missed the pleasure of the food, and if the boy is speaking the truth, he has been saved
from destruction. al-Ghazali argues, therefore, that it is worth while to live as if there were a God
and a hereafter, for if death means annihilation, nothing is lost thereby, but if death means
Paradise or Hell, then the belief means eternal salvation from the fires of Hell and he quotes the
verses
The astrologer and the physician both declared ;
`The dead are not raised.' I said : 'Look to yourselves! if your statement is true, I shall have lost
nothing. If what I say is true, you will lose everything ! ' " 1
Pascal notes that man's thirst for glory, which may be turned to evil uses, is also the chief mark
of his excellence, and al-Ghazali, too, speaks of sovereign power being dear to. all in this world,
but this is because lordship is a Divine attribute and a quality which can be used to enable the
believer to gain the royalty of service to God in this world and the next. I Pascal, again, lays
much stress on disinterested love and holds that the Truth can be reached only through love, as
the saints knew well, and al-Ghazali, more perhaps than any other Sufi writer, lays stress on
Love as the guide on the mystic way, that pure love which will ultimately lead the ]over to the
Creative Truth
Himself. 3
al-Ghazali, therefore, himself indebted to Christianity and the West for not a little of his own
inspiration, was able to repay the debt in kind and to give to the thinkers of the west as well as
the East and to Christian mystics as well as those of own faith, much that was inspiring and
helpful to them as they also sought to tread the path which he had trodden before them.
1 Kitab al-Arba'rn, p. 185. Ihya, IV, p. 52.
= Pens. 404. Cf. pp. 23, 1.54 above.
Treatise on the Passion of Love. Esprit Geomllrique. Works. Ill, p. 175.
CHAPTER XIV
Summary of al-Ghazali's Mystical Teaching. His place in the history of n iflsm
al-Ghazali, as we have seen was a man who travelled widely, who had been in contact with
Hellenic thought as well as the culture of 'Iraq and Syria, who had made a thorough study of
philosophy and theology, of Sufi mysticism and of the mystical teaching of the Christian Church.
His teaching, therefore, is that of a scholar, a philosopher and a theologian, and his is a reasoned,
philosophic type of mysticism, able to appeal to the intellectual type among his readers, while its
sincerity and the use which he makes of familiar illustrations made it equally comprehensible to
the common folk.
It was his great aim to reconcile orthodox Islam with the mystical teaching which was wide-
spread in his time, and to this he consecrated his life and his time, and he succeeded in giving
Sufism an assured place within orthodox Islam. Professedly based upon orthodox Islamic
doctrine, his mysticism yet goes far beyond it and is permeated by another spirit than that of the
Quran and the Sunna. So, too, he has passed far beyond the ascetic quietism of the earlier Sufis
whose sayings he quotes, and his way of life is based upon a theosophic doctrine of mysticism
according to which the soul, by the Divinity within it, is urged to make the upward ascent to the
Godhead, to which it is akin. The mystical teaching found in his earlier works, such as the Ihya
'Ulum al-Din, meant for all to read, must be considered in conjunction with the teaching given in
his later books or those dealing more specifically with Sufi
doctrine, such as Rawdat al-Talibln, al-Ma'arif al-'Aqliyya, Mishkat al-Anwdr, Mizdn al-Aural,
Mltkashafat al-Qtdib, and al-Risalat al-Laduniyya, in which a more developed and more
theosophic type of mysticism is found, and this must be held to represent his final conclusions,
based on his own personal experience and reflections. He himself refers to " esoteric
227
writings, not intended for the general public, but only for those fitted to receive them' and no
doubt it was to such teaching that he referred. He is concerned to shew that it is the mystical
element in religion which is the most vital. that which makes the religious life a reality.
In his teaching on the Nature of God, he lays stress on the Divine Unity, God as the Sole-
Existent and the Ultimate Cause of all being, Transcendent yet Immanent, the Eternal Will which
is manifest in action throughout the universe. To al-Ghazali, He is a Living, Personal God, but all
His attributes are spiritual. He is the Creative Truth, He is the Light of lights, He is perfect
Goodness and Perfect Beauty, the supreme Object of love, indeed, the Only Object of real love.
Yet lie desires intercourse with His creatures and makes it possible for them to enter into
fellowship with Himself through prayer and contemplation and through the gift of gnosis, that
mystic knowledge, which goes beyond the knowledge gained by means of the senses and beyond
the knowledge deduced by the reason, and leads to " union." Those to whom He reveals Himself
are His " friends," the saints to whom is given here and now the knowledge of the " mysteries of
God."
The soul, al-Ghazali teaches, belongs to the Divine world and is itself Divine in origin, made in
the Divine image and partaking of the attributes of God. It is, therefore, capable of receiving a
direct knowledge of God, and entering into a direct relation with Him. The mirror of the soul,
though it may have become rusty and defiled by neglect and sin, if polished and freed from its
blemishes, can reflect the realities of the spiritual world, and the soul can return to the state in
which it was one with the Divine.
The purpose of the Stiff Path is to enable the soul to free itself from. the veils which hinder it
from seeing God and having direct-access to. Him.' It begins with Repentance and Conversion,
which is a spiritual crisis, leading the creature to acknowledge its creatureliness before its
Creator. It, realises in all humility' what it is, but it also has the vision before it of what
1 Cf. Kitiib al-Aladnu+a- bihi'ala gliayr ahlihi, p. 2. Ibn Tufayl. Hats alYagsmr, pp. i,s-is and pp.
202 ff. above.
it may become, and so it turns towards God with a faith that is not a merely outward confession,
but arises from an inner conviction, which desires the purification of the heart from all but God.
This purification of the heart-the only means by which the mystic can approach unto Gad,-is
accomplished by asceticism and renunciation, so that the heart shall be freed of the ties which
attach it to this world and be at leisure to give itself to the consideration of spiritual things,
emptied of self that it may become the dwelling-place of God. When this first stage, the stage of
the novice, still hampered by the world of material values, still striving against the rebellious
soul, has been passed, the novice becomes the traveller, who is half-way to the goal,
The different states and stages through which the mystic passed on the upward ascent, had been
described by teachers before al-Ghazali, notably by al-lfuhasibi, Dhu'I-Nun al-Misri and
Qushayri, but al-Ghazali considers these stages in much greater detail and his analysis, of each of
them, into knowledge, feeling and action, appears to be the result of his own original thought.
Knowledge of the need for them and in what they consist leads to emotion, which may be
pleasant or painful, and this results in action in accordance with that feeling.'
In the stage of the traveller, al-Ghazali teaches that the evil is replaced by good, the virtues, so
painfully acquired, become fixed habits, there are Divine gifts and graces to illuminate the path,
and to assist the soul in its ascent. The traveller has passed into a world where God is known and
His presence realised : his soul repels the attacks made by its Enemy and resists the downward
urge of the self, for its gaze is directed upwards. The " window " towards the heavenly world has
been opened, the soul is no longer blind and deaf to the Divine claims, but the spiritual eye is
awake and the inward hearing alert, and the mystic is constantly aware of the Presence of God
round and about him.
But knowledge of God, derived from intercourse with Him in prayer, means that He is loved who
knows God, loves Him "-and the servant who has become the lover of his Lord,
1 Cf. pp. 164 ff. abovc.
-.1
lives a life dominated by the spirit. There is no longer strife between the higher and the lower
nature, the soul is tranquillised, it is at home in its native sphere, it has attained the summit of the
ascent. The lover is the gnostic, who has found in his direct apprehension of God " an attainment
above all else that can be attained." To the lover, enlightened by that gnosis, the Divine Beauty is
revealed and the joy of that Vision is " what eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, that which has not
entered into the heart of man." The mystic has pierced beyond the veils and sees God as
Essential Light, the One Reality, transcending all that can be seen by the sight or apprehended by
the insight. In that vision of the Beloved, the soul of the mystic passes into union with Him, and
henceforth he lives the life of the saint in God.
al-Ghazali's place in the history of Sufism is that of a great theologian and an original thinker
who, as we have seen, desired to reconcile orthodox Islam with the mystical ideas of-Sufism,
which were widely prevalent in his day. Islam, in his time, seemed in danger from without, for
the Crusaders were girding on their swords to oust the Saracens from Syria, and in Spain the
Moorish influence was declining. The Faith was in danger also from within from sectarian
divisions and from heretical doctrines, and not least from the teaching of pagan philosophy. al-
Ghazali felt himself called to save the Faith from the slow destruction of inward decay by
infusing it with the new spiritual life which alone could arrest the process. This desire arose out
of the conviction, based on his personal religious experience, that religion was a moral thing and
that moral perfection was to be attained only by following the example of the Sufis, who were
not dependent upon an authority derived from others, nor upon knowledge obtained by study, but
had developed a practical way of life which, they claimed, was revealed to them by God
Himself. al-Ghazali's teaching on the first stage of the way, characterised by asceticism and
purgation, shews affinity with that of the earlier Sufi mystics, and especially al-Muhasibi, and he
does not hesitate to illustrate his teaching, in all its phases, by quoting freely from the earlier
mystics, Rabi'a al-'Adawiyya, Abu Yazid Bistami and others, but he
J
l
has his own original contribution to make. He lays the greatest stress on religious experience and
consequently on personality. Self-observation, self-knowledge and self-discipline, he holds, are
of the first importance for the novice. His epistemology and mystical psychology owe something
to al-Muhasibi and to philosophic theory, but he develops them on his own lines. He lays much
more emphasis than his predecessors among the Sufis, r on the Divine origin of the soul and its
possession of Divine attributes, not the least of which is the possession of a will which controls
action. Believing that the Universe is the manifestation of God, he regards man as a microcosm,
who is equally the manifestation of God, on a smaller scale. This estimate of man as the image of
the Divine means that al-Ghazali takes a lofty view of man's spiritual possibilities ; it means. too,
that man, possessed of will, must himself take an active and strenuous part in seeking to realise
his high possibilities. He is endowed with the reasoning faculty (al-rilh al-'agli wa'l-ruh al fikrii),
which enables him to understand intelligibles and make deductions therefrom, and both mind and
will must be employed in attaining the purpose of bringing both into conformity with the Mind
and Will of God.
But there is a plane beyond that of the Intelligence, and this is the sphere of the Divine spirit, the
"inner light" which comes from the Light of lights, and al-Ghazali has added much to this
conception, found in a more elementary form in earlier writers. That light will burn steadily and
clearly only in a heart pure and at leisure ; it will be reflected in its full glory, only in the
polished' mirror, free from every blemish ; and prayer, worship, meditation and recollection are
the means of gaining that access to God, which means dwelling in the light. It is when min seeks
to draw nigh unto God, that He hastens to draw nigh unto man.2 al-Ghazali has devoted a whole
book to the theme of God as Light and the possession by the human
1 Cf. his al-Ma¢nun al-Saghir, where he writes of the human spirit as the emanation (fay4) of
God's Essence, pp. 3 ff. While insisting that the soul is " created " in the sense of coming into
existence in time, he admits that it is
" untreated " in another sense, being self-subsistent and immortal. Elsewhere he writes of it as "
abiding, eternal, incorruptible." a1-Rosdial a1-Laduuiyva, p. 29.
2 Cf. Mishkal a1.Anud'', pp. 132, 136,
232 AL.GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING
soul of a measure of that light, which in the saints and prophets burns brightly and clearly. But
the conception finds a place in nearly all his mystical writings.1
All the Sufi mystics had realised that Love was the guiding principle of the seeker after God ; the
self with its insistent claims, could only be overcome by a love greater than that of self-love and
so, by all of them, God was conceived of, as the Beloved, and the Sufi thought of himself as the
lover, longing for the consummation of his love in union with the Beloved. Rabi'a al-'Adawiyya
had taught that the seeker could only be purified by love and she was almost the first to teach the
doctrine of Pure Love, love that gave itself with no desire for reward, seeking only the Beloved
and His glory, and al-Ghazali quotes many of her sayings on love. al-Muhasibi also, had written
a book on Love and found that it included both longing for the Beloved and joy in the
consciousness of His presence, and Satisfaction he regards as part of Love, for the lovers of God
have passed beyond states and stations and have found their rest in Him. al-Ghazali reproduces
much of al-Muhasibi's teaching on this subject word for word. Dhu'l-Nun al-Misri, again, had
laid stress on the Pure Love of God, free from all defilement, on Fellowship as the joy of the
lover in the Beloved, on the ecstasy produced by the "wine of Love." Abu Yazid al-Bistami,
another of al-Ghazali's sources, had been a great lover, and to him love was an all-absorbing
passion.
So al-Ghazali had found such teaching on mystic love available to him, and he made full use of it
in his great section on Love in the Ihyd, It was, therefore, no new doctrine, but he develops it in a
new and systematic fashion. He analyses the types of love and the causes of love. Love may be
self-love, or it may be disinterested love, the love of a thing for its own sake, which alone is true
love. He shews that the chief cause of love is Beauty, in whatever form it shews itself, sensual,
intellectual or moral, but affinity is also the cause of love. He concludes that since all the causes
of love are combined in God and in Him alone, He alone is worthy of true love, a pure and all
1 Cf. 1hva, 111, p. 16. IV, pp. 67, 278, 370. Rawr4A al-TdliMO, p. 163. Aluhashafaf af-Qulilb,
p. 30. .tfizdu al-'Amua!, p. 107. al-Mlffaglad al-Astid.
AL-GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING 233 absorbing love, which leaves no room for the
love of anything
else.'
The doctrine of the Beatific Vision was based not only upon the Qur'an 2 and such a tradition as
" God hath Seventy Thousand Veils of Light and Darkness : if He were to withdraw them aside,
then would the glory of His Countenance consume each one who looked upon Him," but upon
legends of the Ascent of Muhammad, an experience to which the Mi'rdj of the mystic Abu Yazid
al-Bistami: approximates very closely. 3 Early mystics, including Rabi'a and Dhu'I-Nun al-Misri
had realised that the Vision of God in His Beauty, the desire of the lover, might be vouchsafed to
the gnostics in this life. But it was al-Ghazali who first gave the doctrine a complete and
developed form and he devotes a whole chapter of the Ihyd to the subject, writing of the Vision
as the result of gnosis, the enlightenment of the understanding by the light of God Himself, and
drawing a parallel between the spiritual and the physical vision.;
The state of mystic ecstasy in which the mystic loses consciousness of self and remains
conscious only of the Divine, when the worshipper is absorbed in Him. Whom he worships,
which the Sufis called fans' (passing away from the self) resulting in bagel' (subsistence in Gods
is a conception found among the early Sufis such as Abu Yazid Bistami, Abu Said al-Kharraz
and Junayd. al-Ghazali adds something to this conception in his teaching on the subject, and
though he tries to guard himself
against the admission that the creature can be actually identified
with the Creator, that is in fact the conclusion which he reaches. 8
Fans' he holds, means that the mystic has become unconscious
not only of his body, but of his very self. He has ceased to be
self-conscious and has become God-conscious. It was in this
state that lIallaj and Abu Yazid felt themselves to be one with
God, and so, to be deified, and it is to be noted that al-Ghazali
1 A recent book a1-Gharaii's Boek der Liefde, by H. Dingpmans (Leiden.

1938), includes a translation into Dutch of al-Ghazali's Book on Love, together
tvith an introduction on al-Ghazall's teaching on the subject
Cf. SOras LXXV. 22. XCII, 20. XXIV, 35.
' Cf. my Studies in Early Mysticism, pp. 240 II- Cf. Rawlat al-Tdlibtn, pp. 762, 182, and cf. pp.
188 ff above. ' Cf. R. A. Nicholson, The Mystics of Islam, pp. 163 ff. " Cf. pp, 191 ff. above. Cf.
Ihy4, IV, p. 212.
,
p. 70.
234 r AL-GHAZALI'S MYSTICAL TEACHING
has 'n(? word of condemnation for them. only adding that " the words/ of passionate lovers in the
state of- ecstasy should be concealed and not spoken of. " This, he says, is not real identity
(ittihad), but what is meant by the verses of al-Iiallaj
" I am He Whom I love and He Whom I love is I,

We are two spirits indwelling one body."
It is as if a man should look into a mirror and suppose that the form he sees in the mirror is the
form of the mirror, one with it, or as if, seeing the wine in the glass, he supposes it is the colourbf
the glass. When such a state prevails with the mystic, it is called fand', even fans' al-fans',
because he is unaware that he has passed away from himself.. Behind this statt , al-Ghazali
admits there are mysteries which it is not fitting to discuss. ' But at the end of the same treatise he
does go farther still, and asserts that at the end of the journey the mystic " is consumed " by the
glory of the Divine Countenance and overwhelmed by the Divine Majesty and as a separate
personality is absorbed into the One Reality. "All has15erished save His Countenance." 2
Elsewhere he writes that the mystic is overwhelmed by the waves of the ocean of Unity and is
submerged in the Whole. s This is "union" in the deepest mystical sense of the term, though it is
the re-union of the drop with the ocean whence it came forth, and the re-union of the spark with
the flame, the part still subsistent in the whole.
It can hardly be said to differ essentially from the conception of mystical union maintained by
the pantheist, but al-Ghazali is usually careful, at any rate in those of his writings intended for
the general public, not to make the transition from theosophy to pantheism : his belief;
recognising the transcendence as well as the immanence of God, is rather panentheism, " not the
doctrine that all is God, but the doctrine that all is in God, Who is also above all.",' None the less,
when writing as a
' Mishkd4, pp. 114, 115. 1 Ibid., PP- 144, 145.

s Rawtat al-Talsbin, p. 153. Cf. Personality above.
' Cf. R. A. Nicholson, The Idea of Personality in ,Sufism, p. 27, also M. Igbal, " in him, like
Borger and Solger in Germany, Snff pantheism and the Ash ante dogma of personality appear to
harmonise together, a reconciliation which makes it difficult to say whether he was a Pantheist or
a Personal Pantheist of the type of Lotze." The development of Metaphysics in Persia, p. 75.
mystic, for the benefit of the initiated, he comes very close to pantheism in his inclination
towards the doctrine of emanation, 1 which means that the Divine Essence is really the substance
of all existent things, for they are one in kind with it, if differing in degree. But al-Ghazali comes
still nearer the position of the pantheistic monist when he declares, even in the Ilhyd, meant for
the general reader, that the universe, including the visible and invisible worlds, considered as a
whole, is the Divine Reality, which includes all existent things. 2 Again he writes of seeing all
multiplicity as emanating: from the One, and then, of ceasing to see multiplicity at all, but seeing
all existence as One.3 He expresses this view even more clearly in the Miskkdt, where he states
that there is no ipse but God (Id kuwa illa kuaa'a), for huwa is an expression for what • can be
indicated, and in whatever direction we turn, He alone is indicated (for all things point to Him).
Indeed whenever you indicate anything the indication is really to Him, though it may not be
realised. Again, he writes that God is " with " everything at all times, and by and through Him all
things are manifested, and the Manifestor cannot be separated from what is manifested. So "
nothing remaineth but the One Reality." God, the One in All and the All in All. 4
Here, in al-Ghazali's mystical teaching, is found the anticipation of the development of Sufism
into a definitely pantheistic system of philosophy, of which the greatest exponent was Mubyi al-
Din Ibn al-'Arabi, in the century following al-Ghazali's death, and it is evident that the chief
principles of his teaching are to be found in essence in al-Ghazali's writings, though Ibn al-'Arabi
goes far beyond al-Ghazali in making a fundamentally pantheistic monism the basis of all his
mystical teaching. To the same school of thought belonged the great Persian mystic poets Jalal
al-Din Rumi, who died some thirty years after Ibn al-'Aralhi ind Jami, who lived some two
centuries later, who wrote :
6 Cf. al-ila'drif al-Agliyya, fol. iib. Mishhdt, pp. 117. 144. al-Risdlat
al-Ladaniyya, p. 43. al-Madman al-Saghir, p. 3. Strr nl-' har„ayu, p. 32. 1 Ihyd, III, p. 13. Cf. P.
141 above. Z Ihyd, IV, p. 212.
' IiisMdP, pp. 117, 120, 121, 145.
236
" Where'er a veil thou seest, Behind that veil He hides,"
and again
" He is both Treasure and Casket : there is here no place for I and
Thou, which are but phantasies."
Al-Ghazali s place in the history of Sufism, therefore, is that of the thinker who really
systematised its doctrines and gave them clearness and precision, and by his great influence
enabled Sflfism henceforward to be accepted as an integral-and the most vital-element in Islam.
It was his aim to bring men to a knowledge of God through mysticism : he was convinced that
true religion must always be a matter of personal experience, and it was because his teaching was
so plainly the result of his own spiritual experience and a reflection of his own inner life, that his
leadership was acknowledged and men counted him as one of the greatest of the Sufis, one of the
friends" of God, a second Prophet, and his Ihya as a second Qur'an. His teaching includes all of
value that the earlier Sufis had to contribute, to which he adds his own great and original contri-
bution, while the reasoned, philosophic form in which it is presented enabled others who came
after him to build on the foundations which he had laid and to develop a mystical doctrine, which
for him depended upon a deep religious and personal experience, into a definitely pantheistic
system of philosophy.
It is a significant fact that at the present time al-Ghazali's works are still read and studied (and
their teaching accepted as authoritative), more widely than those of any other Muslim writer,
throughout the length and breadth of the world of Islam.
BIBLIOGRAPHY OF AUTHORS QUOTED
I, GENERAL
A. E. Affifi, The Mystical Philosophy of AI. at-D. Ibn al•'Araid. Cambridge
1939.
M. 'Ali Aini, Abd. al-Kadir Guildnf. Paris. 1438.
T. l6. Arnold and A. Guillaume (Editors), The Lceacv of Islam, Oxford. 1931. - and R A.
Nicholson, Volufne of Oriental Studies presented to E. G. Lrcuaac,
Cambridge. 1922.
St, :lugustine, Confessions. London. 1886.
De Civilate Dci,
J. 13oehme, The .lurora (tr. J. Sparrow). London. 101.4.
C. Brockelmann, Geschichte der Arabischcn Litteraiur, Weimar. 1898-19c.. - Supplement. 1937
E. G. rowne, .9 Literary History of Persia. Cambridge. 1928. Kh. Bukhsh, Islamic Civilisation,
Calcutta. 1929-30.
T. Canaan, Mohammedan Saints and Sanctuaries in Palestine. London. 1027. Carra de Vaux, Les
penseurs de l Islam. Paris, 1923. - al-Ghazali. Paris. 19o2.
John Cassian, Colloquia.
t. Cyres, Pascal. London. igog. Dante .Alighieri, Conuito. - Paradiso.
H. Dingemans, ai-Ghazall's Boeh der Liefde. Leiden. 1938.
H. G. Farmer, The Influence of Music, from Arabic Sources. London. 1929. H. Frick, Ghazdli's
Selbstbiographie : sin Vergleich mit Augustins KonJessionesn.
Leipsig. igig.
W, H. T. Gairdner, al-Ghazatt's Mishhdt al-Anuar, London. 1924.
L,,..Ir. Gosche, Cbsr Ghaeili's Leben u Werke. Berlin. 1858,
A. Guillaume, Prophecy and Divination. London. ,1938.
R. Heber-Newton, The Mysticism of Music. London. 1915.
J. Hell, The Arab Civilisation (tr, J. K. Bukhsh). Cambridge. 1926. Ar. Igbal, The Development
of Metaphysics in Persia. London. 1906, Rufus Jones, New Studies in M stical Religion. London.
1927. Julian of Norwich, Revelations ofyDivine Love. London. 1927.
A. von. Kremer, Geschichle der herrschenden Ideen des Islams, Leipsig. 1868. D. B. Macdonald,
The Life of aI-Ghazdlf. Journal of the American Oriental
Society. 1899.
Raymond Martin (Marti), Explanatia Simboli. Anuari d'estudis catalans.
March. 1910.
- Pugio Fidei. Leipzi&. 1687.
L. Massignon, La Passion d'al-Halldj. Paris. 1922. - Textes In6dits. Paris. 1929. P. Elmer More,
Christian Mysticism. London. 1932.
R. A. Nicholson, Eastern Poetry and Prose, Cambridge. 1922. - The Idea of Personality in
Sufism. Cambridge. 1923. - .4 Literary History of the Arabs. Cambridge. 1930. - The Mystics of
Islam. London. 1914. - Studies in Islamic Mysticism. Cambridge. 1921.
J. Obermann, Der Philosophische and Religiose Subjectivismus Ghazalfs. 1921.
237
238
M. Assn Palacios, Islam and the Divine Comedy (tr. H. Sunderland). London.
• 1926.
- Logia et Agrapha. Patrologia Orientals,. \III, XIX. Paris. 1926.
- La Mystique d'al-Gharalf. Beyrout 191 f
- La esptritualidad de Algazel y ore scni to .-ristiano. Madrid. 1934-1936. Blaise Pascal, Works
(ed. Lahure). Paris. 1972 Plotinus Enneads (tr. S. Mackenna). London 1917- 1o. G. Russell (A.
E.), Song and its Fountain, I . radon. 112. Margaret Smith, An Early Mystic of Baghdad
L Ion. 1935. - RSbi'a the Mystic and her Fellow-Saints in l:l'sm. 'ambridge. 1928. - Studies in
Early Mysticism. London. 1931 G. Le' Strange, Palestine under the Moslems, hmdo..', Tbyn. St.
Thomas Aquinas, Contra Gentiles.
- Summa Theologica.
A. J, Wensinck, The Relation between al-Gkasdlf's Cosmology and his Mysticism.
Amsterdam. 1933
A. F. Wfistenfeld, Die Acadamien der Araber and ihre Lehrer. Gottingen. 1937. The Zohar (tr.
H. Sperling and 111. Simon), London. 1931-34. S. Zwemer, A Moslem Seeker after God. New
York. 1920.
II. ARABIC, PERSIAN AND SYRIAC AUTHORS
N. al-D. Ibn al-'Arabs, Kitab al-Ajwiba (tr. T. H. Weir). J.R.A.S. 1goi. - Fusus al-Hikam.
Bombay. A.H.1300. - Futlihal al-Makkiya. Cairo. A.H. 1293- Tarjurndn al-Ashwaq (ed. and tr.
R. A. Nicholson). London. 1gi,.
Ibn 'Asakir, Kitab Tabyin (tr. Mehren) IIIrd Inter. Congress of Orientalists. Abu'l Faraj
Barhebraeus, Book of the Dove. Leiden. i9o9. Abu Hamid al-Ghazall, The Alchemy of
Happiness (tr. C. Field from the
Hindustani). London.
- al-Arba'in ft Ulul al-Din. Cairo. A.H. - Ayyuha'-l-Walad. Cairo. A.H. 1349- Bidayat al-Hiddya.
Cairo. A.H. 1349. - Fatihat al-'Ulum. Cairo. A.H. 1322.
- al-Hikmat ft Makhlugat Allah, Cairo. A.H. 5321.
Ihya 'Ulum al-Din. Cairo. A.H. 1272 (reprint 1340). - Imih (margin Ithaf). Cairo. A.H. 1311. -
Khuldsat al-Talanif f'l-Tacawwuf. Cairo. A.H. 1327. - Kimiya al-Sa4da. Cairo. A.H. 1343. - al-
Ma'arif al-'Agliyya. 11 MS. Bodleian. Pococke 263. - Ma'arij al-Quds fi madarij Ma'rifat a1
Nafs. Cairo. - al-Matinun bihi 'ala Ghayr ahlihi. Cairo. A.H. 1309. - at-Marinun al-Saghir. Cairo.
A.H. 1309. - al-Maglad al-Asnd Sharh Asma Allah. Cairo.
- Min Ajwibat As'ilat Ibn al-'Arabf. MS. Paris. 5291- Minhaj al-'Ahidin. Cairo. A.H. 1353. -
Minhaj al-'Arifin. Cairo. A.H. L344- Mi'rdj al-Sdlihtra Cairo. A.H. 1344.
.tlishkat al-Anwar. Cairo. A.H. 1343. - ;bli'yar al-'I'm. Cairo. A.H. 1329. - .1111kashafat al-
Quhib. Cairo. n,d.
al-Mungidh min al-Datal. Cairo. A.H. 1304
- al-Qalida al-Ta'iyya. Cairo. A.H. 1346.
- al-Radd alJamil li Ilahivat 'Isd bi larch allnjfl. - ol-Rawdat al-Tdlibin, Cairo, A.H. 1344- al-
Risalat al-Laduniyya. Cairo. A.H. 1343. - al-Risalat al-Wa'yya. Cairo. A.H. 1343.
- (attributed tc) Sire al-'Alamayn wa Kashf ura fit-Darayn. Cairo. A.H. 5327.A. b. 'U. al-jullanl
al-Hujwiri, Kashf alMahjab (tr. R. A. Nicholson), London.
1926,
BIBLIOGRAPHY 239
Ikhwln al-Sail, Rasa'il. Cairo. 1928.
Isaac of Nineveh. Mystic Treatises. (Tr. A. J Wensinck): Amsterdam. 1923. Abu Nu'avm al-
Isfahani, Hilyat al-.tw?rya MS. Leiden Or. 3iIa. 'A. al-R.. Jamt, Lawa'ih (ed. and tr. R. Ff.
Whinfield). London. 1928.
Nafaat al-Uns.. (ed. W. N. Lees) Calcutta. 1850.
J. al-Din Ibn al-Jawzi, al-Ndmus ft Talbis Iblis. Cairo. A.H. 1340. Ibn Jubayr, Rihla (ed. de
Goeje). London 1907. Ibn Khaldun, Ilistoire des Berb&res (tr. de Slane). Paris. 1925. Ibn
Khallikln, Biographical Dictionary (tr. de Slane). . Paris. 1842M. b. 'A. al-Khatib, Mishkat al-
Ma.66fh. Lucknow. A.H. 1319. M. Bagir Khw&nsarl, RaWat al-Jannat. Teheran. A.H. 1306.
Abu J'alib al-Makki, Qut al- uliib, Cairo. A.H. 1351.
'A. al-Wahid alMarrakusbI, History of the al-Mohades (ed. R. Dozy). Leiden.
1881.
H. b. Asad al-Muhasibl. Fall fi'l-Mahabba. MS. Leiden. Or. Via. - Kitab al-'71m. MS. 'Milan
Am. 460. - Ma'iyyat al-'Aql wa ma'ndhu. MS. Stambul. Jarallah. - al-Ri aya li Hugaq Alldh (ed.
Margaret Smith). Cambridge. - Risalat Adab al-Nufus. t'IS. Stambul. Jarallah.
al-IValdva (Nal6'ih). Cairo Ta;. 1416.
AI. al-Murtada, Ithaf al-Soda. Cairo. A.x. 1311
'A. al-R. al-Mun&wl, at-Kawakib al-Durriyya. MS. Brit. Mus. Add. 23369. 'Abd al-Qadir, Futiih
al-Ghayb (margin Qala'id). Cairo. A.H. 1303. Qazw[nl, Athdr al.Bil4d (ed. F. Wustenfeld).
Guttingen. 1848. Abu' 1-QAsim al-Qush'ayri, Risala. Cairo. A.H. 1330. M. Rid&, Aba Humid
al-Ghas4li. Cairo. 1924.
Abu'l-Walid ibis Rushd (Averroes) alKashf 'an manahij. al-adilla. Cairo.
A.H. 1319.
J. al-D. Rums Diwdn Shams-i-Tabriz (ed. and tr. R. A. Nicholson). Cambridge.
1928. -
Abu NaF al-Sarraj, Kitab al-Luma' (ed. R. A. Nicholson). London. 191,.. 'A. al-W. al-Sha'rdril.
(Sha'rlwi) al-Anwdr al-Qudsiyya (margin Landgilrl
Cairo. A.H. 1299.
- Lata'if al-Minan. Cairo. A.H. 1288.. - Mizan (ed. Perron). Alger. 1898.
- al-Tabagat al-Kubra (Lawigih al-Anwar). Cairo. A.H. 1299.
Ibn Sin& (Avicenna), Fi'l-Kashf -an Mahtyat al-$alai, Cairo. 1817. T. al-D. al-Subkr, J'abagat al-
Shafi'iyya. Cairo. A.H. 1324.
Sh. al-D. Abu Hats Suhrawardi, 'Awarif al-Maarif (margin Ihya)• Cai
A.H. 1272 (reprint 1340).
'A. at-R. al-Sulamf, Tabaqat al-$ufiiyya. MS. Brit. Mus. Add. 18520. M. al-Tadaff, Qala'id al-
Jawethir. Cairo. A.H. 1303. Ibn Tufayl, Hayy b. Yagzdn. Alger. 1goo.
Yafi'f al-Sb, al-Tamimi, Mir'at al-Jandn. MS. Br. Mus. Or. iii (sup. 4 Yaqut b. 'Abdallah, Mu'jam
al-Buldan (Geog. Worterbuch). Leipsig. I. Ziy& Bay, Khardbat. Stambul. A.H. 1291,
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1940.
1344.
A.H. 1346.
MS. Aya Suya. 2246.
.Y
INDEX
I. GENERAL
Arabic names to which the definite article al- is prefixed will be found under their initial letter-
Titles of books, etc., are printed in italics.
'AbdallAh h. Ja'far, 43, 44, 49 'Abdallah b. 'Umar, 46
'Abd al-Ghafir, Abu'1-Hasan al-Fdrisl,
32, 33, 61, 62
'Abd al-Hakim, 42
'Abd al-Qadir al-Jilani, 204, 205, 207 Ahiwardf, Abu'l-Mu4affer, 37 Abraham, 114, 126, 180
Abu'l-'Abbas al-Alishl, 37, 38 Abu 'AbdallAh Af. b. Hamdln, 198 Abu 'Abdall3h b. Said (al-
ZAhid). 27 Abu Darda, 49. 50 Abu Dharr, 184
Abir Hhmid, A. b. SalAmat, 30
Abu 'HAmid al-Ghazall (uncle f
al-Ghaz.ll), ro, 17
Abu'l-Hasan al-Basrl, 28, 43 Abu Hurayra, 49 Abu'l-Khattab, 65
Abu Nu'aym al-IsfahAnl, 15, 124 Abu Sa'd al-Mubarak, 204
Abu Sa'id b. Abi'l-Khayr, 9, 184 Abu Sulavman, see al-Dar3nl Abu Talib, see al-Makkt AN
TammAm, 37
Abu'l-WafA' b. 'Ugayl al-Hanball, 61 Ably Yazid al-Bistamf, 9 123, 125, 126,
156, 230, 232 ff.
Adam, 107 114 Adrianople, 218 Affifi, A. E., 212 Afghanistan, 6z Ahkdm al-Q>Mr'dn, 62
Ahmad b. Khadawiya, Aini, M. 'All, 204, 205 AhhMr Da'aid, 114 Alemanus, Johanan, 278
Aleppo, 209, 219 Alexander, II Alexandria, 28, 64, 112 Alffsi, Isaac, 218 'All b. Abl Talib, 64,
21.6
'All b. Yiisuf b. TAshfln, 63, 64, 1g8 Almohades, 64
Almoravides, 21, 64 Alp Arslan, in, s8
Aminiyya (Madrassa), 28
Amul, 19, 28 Andalusia, 198, 203 Angela of Foligno, coo Anthony, St., 52
Aquinas, St. Thomas, 67, 220 ff., 224 Asceticism, 17, 91 ff., 124, 129, 154
162, 201, 204, 229 Avendeath (Ibn Da'ud), 217 Averroes, see Ibn Rushd Avicenna, see Ibn
SIMS Augustine, St., 2g, 121, 187 'Awarrf al-Ma'tlrnf, 207
Baghdad, ro, 149 ff., 29, 30, 33, 35. 55,
6o, 63 ff., 127 ff., 183, 198 ff., 204
209, 219
Baharanl, Abu'l-Fadl al-blu er, 202 Balearic Isles, rg8
Balkh, 19
Balgls (Quests of Sheba), 27 Barcelona, 217, 223 Barbebraus, 219 Barker, E., zoo, 136
Barkiyaruk, Majd al-Mulk, 61 Basra, 19, 48, 113, 128, 205 Baybaq, 61
Bayt al-Hikma, 20
Beauty, Divine, 89, 93, 94, 109, 131,
138, 139, 141, 151, 153, 175 fl.,
190, 192, 196, 205, 207, 209, 212,
228, 230, 233.
Bedouin, 55, 73 Berbers, 64 Bethlehem, 120
Bishr b. al-Harith, 183 Bistaml, see Abif Yazid Bahme, Jacob, 145 Book of the Dove, 319 Book
of Love (Ihyu),.213
Book of the Refutation of the Bigot, 202 Brockelmann, C., 66, 202 Browne, E. G., 9, 134, 139
Bukhsh, Kh., 20
Bundar, Ibn al-Husayn, 193
126
241
244 INDEX
Listron, 218
Lotze, 234
Love. 35, 75, 84, 88, 99, 109, 123, 12q,
129, 131, 141, 152 ff., 173 ff., 185 ff.,
204, 212, 213, 226, 228, 232 1obab al-lhva, 55, 202 Llsgman, 52, 52
.4fa'arif ai-':lvlivya, 203, 227

Macdonald, D. B., 64 Maimonides, 217
Majd al-Din Muhammad, 6o Afajma' at-Ghara'ib, 62 isfalnun, 177
Makkl, Abu Tdlib, 123, 128, 163 Mdlik b. Dlnar, 48 Malik Shah, 9, 28, 61 Ma'mun, 20
11Iagd$id al-Fahisafa, 199, 223
Maraght, Abu'l-Futuh, 28 Marakash, 198
Marakushi, 'Abd al-Walud, 64 Mark, SL, 1x4
Martin, Raymund, 223, 225 Ma41$i, NW Allah, 27 Masruq, 183
Ma.ssignon, L., 112, 125, 127 Matthew, St., 1x6 ff., 128, r55 MazdarAn, 13
Mecca, 15, 22, 63, 128 Media, 6
Medina, 15, 6o, 216
Meditation, 25, 26, 32, 49, 67, 94,
168 ff., 185, 201, 213, 231
Melatia, 21g Merv, 2g Meshed, 9
Minaret of al-Ghaz&li, 27
Mishkdt at-Anwar, 232, 199, 202, 212,
2,8, 227, 235
Mizdn al-'Amal, 202, 217, 21g, 223, 227 More, Elmer, 173
Morocco, 33, 63, 199, 214
Moses, 15, 114, 117, 126, 235, 180, 211 Moses Ibn Habib, 218 Mosul, 19
Muhammad, the Prophet, 16, 34, 41,
43. 46, 49 ff., 6o, 77, 78, 82, 95, 97
99, 101, 114, 122, 125, 143, 145, 146,
161, 179, 180, 210, 214, 225, 233, 236 M4diabal at-Nufas, 124
Muhaslbf, Harlth, 123 ff., 200, 229 8. Muk4shafai al-Qulab, 227 Munaw1, 35, 39, 51. 53, 92 ff.,
122, 125,
141, 143
Mungidh min al-DaMl, igg
Mania, 209
Murta4a, 15, 18, 30, 37, 51, 66, 84,
85, 94, 202
Music, 58, 83 ff., 109, 110, 1F2,
125, 129, 131, 197, 201, 207
INDEX
245
113,
Naples, 220
Nardi, Bruno, 220 Na.r al-Magdisl, 27 Nassaj, Yusuf, 14, 25 Nawgan, 9
Nawgani, Abu Sa'Id, 30 Neo-Platonism, 105, io6, log, 110,
112 ff.
Nicholson, R. A., 9, 38, 46, 112, 173,
178, 213, 233. 234
Nishapur, ,o, 15, 17 ff., 31, 32, 6o ff-,
65, 77, 84, 129
NlshApurf, Abu Sa'Id b. Yahya, 64, 65 Niyam al-Mulk, 9,,17 ff. Nurl, Abu'l-Husayu, 49
Qabbalah, -218
Qadiriyya, order, 204, 205 Qaslda al-Ta'iyya, 9o, 118, Qazwln, 55
Qazwinl, 37, 39
Qur'4n, 10, 25, 35, 5o, 62, 87, 109, 114,
122, 124, 154, 227, 233, 236 Quray:h, 43, 44 Qushayri, Abu'I-Oasim, 17,
129 ff., 164, 229 QtI al-Quiab, 128
Rabi a al-'Adawivya, 45, 52, 57, 123,
179, 187, 230, 232 ff.
Radhkdn1 al-Tus1, 13
al-Raggl, Abu Bakr, see al-Dinawarl al-Raggi, Ibrahim, 51, 52 Rawdal al-f'alibln, 26, 131, 21-7
Raymond (of Toledo), 220 Ra2I, al-TayalisI, 174
Reason, 69, 71, 76, 124, 142, 151, 222,
225
Recollection, 25, 94 ff., 103, Iii, ,68 ff.,
180, 182, 193, 206, 231 Repentance,.29, 102, 128, 152 ff., 206,
228
Republir, The, Iiz
Resurrection; 41, 59, 77, 98, 118, 196,
208
Ri'aya ti Uagaq A11ah, 123
Rida, M., 11, 15, 19, 37, 56, 6o, 65,
94, 126, 3198, 200, ^-16
Rifa'I, Ahmad, 205 ff. Rifa'iyya; order, 205 ff. Risalat al-Laduniyva, 227
Risalat at-Qushayriyya, 62, 129, 219 Rumi, Jalal al-Din, 178, 235 Russell, George, 83
Sa'd b. Faris, al-LubAn, 65
Sa'di, 207
Said {Grand Vizier), 33
Saints, 42, 52, 56, 102, 103, 142, 163,
165, 193 8., 204, 217, 222, 226, 228,
232
Salerno, 220
Samisatiyya, Rhangah, 26
Sarraj, Abu NW, 51, 174, 193, 216 Satan, 14, 24, 74, 75, 78, 134, 156, 157 Satisfaction, 29, 89,
izg, 163, 173,
182 ff., 232
Seftrtt, 218
Self- the 70, 84, 91, 94, zoo ff., 103,
107, 227, 143, 148 ff., 160, 174, 175,
181; 186, 289, 194, 206 ff., 212,
231 ff. ; self-mortification, 17, 18, 25 Seljugs, 20, 65
Seven Heavens, 38, 110 ff., 224
Seville, 64, 198. 199, 209
ShabbAk, see al-Jurlanf Shadhill, Abu'l-Hasan, 213 Shadhitiiyya, order, 214, 216 Shafi'l, 42, 63,
129 5hahnama, 9
Shakespeare, go Sha'ranl, 123, 216
Shibli, 35, 49, 123,-127, 164, 177, 103 Shirizi, Abu Ishaq,'20 Sicily, 220
Sima'an (Christian monk), 118
Sin, 25, 41, 53, 75, 79, 102, 120 ff.,
153, 160, 164, 166, 180, 194
Sitt al-Nisk, 6o Sociability, 40 ff.
Solitude, 18, 25, 54, 67, 73, 84, 93 6.,
103, 168, 169, 186, 195, 201, 203 Solomon, 114, 135
Soul, the, 16, 23, 25, 53. 56, 73, 88,
91, 98, 107 ff., 213, 122 R., 141 ff.,
147 ff., 157, 166.ff., 174 ff., 189,
207, 219, 222, 228 ff.; Universal
Soul, 107, 213
Spain, 21, 64, 198, 199, 209, 219, 2298. Spheres, the, go, 109, 113 Spirit, the Divine, 90, 120,
1.26, 142,
145, 208, 231
States, 5Ufi, 14, 15, 56, 88, 131, 162,
168, 173, 174, 201, 216, 229, 232
Stations, Stiff,- 14, 72, 131, 163, 166,
168, 173, 174, 216, 232
Subkl, so, 11, 13 ff, iS, 20, 21, 26 ff.,
32, 33, 35 ff., 53, 55, 60, 62 ff-, 71,
84, 85, 102, 215
Sufis, 17, 18, 22, 23, 33, 51, 53, 82,
88, 89, 91, 95, 104, 122, 123, 125,
129, 143, 157, 168, i89, zoo, 201,
209, 214, 216, 227, 230 ff., 236 Sufism, 24, 15, 17, 22, 23, 25, 26, 32,
62, 129, 141, 157, 200, 20t, 204, 207,
209, 214, 227, 230, 235, 236
Sufyan al-Thawrl, see al-Thawri Suhrawardi, al-lllagtul, 19, 37 Suhrawardi, Shibab al-Din, Abu
Hafs,
179, 207 ff.
Sulami, Abu 'Abd al-RahmAn, 129, 171 Sus, 63
Suwar, M. b., 1,4
Syria, 25, 63, 120, 209, 214, 216,
230
TabarAn, 9, 36
T'abaristdn, 19, 28, 61 Tabagal al-,dbyya, 129 TIdaf2, 205
Tafriga bayn al-Islam wa'l-Zandaga,
199
Tafstr (Kildb Haga'iq at-Tafstr), 129
145
i
19, 62,
Obermann, J., 112 Orpheus, 85 Otto, R., 99 Oxus, 62
Padwick, C., 115 Palacios, M. Asin,
225
Palermo, 220 Panentheism, 211, 234 Pantheism, 211, 234 ff.
Paradise, 36, 41, 43, 59, 76, 92 ft.,
118,154, 166,187 ff.,195,196, 222 ff.,
226
Paradiso, 224
Pascal, Bfaise, 225 ff.
Path, of the Sub, 17, 18, 25, 55, 72,
9i, 121, 131, 147, 152, 159 1f.
173 ff., 192, 204, 207, 228
Patience, 8o, 128, 154, 162 ff. Paul, St., 24, 216, 118, 119, 146 Pensies (of Pascal), 225 Persia,
xo, 21g
Pheedo, 112 Pharisees, 117 Plato, tog, 121, Platonism, 112 Plotinus, 105 ff., 112 Porphyry, 1i2
Potiphar, t77
Poverty, 6o, 92, 125, 262, 184, 194 Prayer, 35, 8o, 90, 95 ff., 110, 113, 124,
i6,, 169, 171, 208, 229, 231;.for
the dead, 97
Prophet, see Muhammad Psalms, 85, 114 Pugio Fidei, 223, 225
Purification, 25, 89, 91, 100, 102, 113,
120, 1211 124, 1$7 ff., 162, 205, 229
120, 212, 220, 224,
95,
i
112
227,
246
Tahafut al-Faldsafa, 199 Takhrij (of Iraqi), 216 Talbis MO. 200 Talmud, Ito
Tarjuman al-Ashwaq, 213 7awral, 114
Thawri, SufvAn, 97, 123 Theology of 'Aristotle, 112 Tigris, 17, 44
Ti,nceus, 112
Tlnati, Ab'l-Khayr, 51, 52 Toledo, 217, 220
Traditions, 10, 20, 95, 61, 62, Travel, 44 ff.
Trinity, 167
Tripoli, 64, 219
Trust, in God, 116, 129, 162, 163, 166 ff., sea tawakkul Tughril Bey, 1o
Tunis, 213, 214
Turtasbf, Abu Bakr, 21, 63
TUs, 9, 10, 13 f., 17, 30, 33, 35, 60, 104, 130
Tustarr, Sah], 13, 183
'Ubayd AM, -6o

Umar b. 'Abd al-'Aziz, 47, 48 'Umar b, al-Khattab, 28 'Umar Khayyam, 9, 155
Umayyads, z6, 63
Underhill, E., 89
Union (the Unitive life), 125, 121, 128, 172, 187, 189 ff., 206, 213, 217, 228, 230, 234
WVasay4 (Nasa'ih), 124 W,Is2/, 65
Wensinck, A. J., 112, 114, 219 Whinfield, E, H., 112
Will, of God, 13, 74, 96, 97, 156,
Y6fi'f, 'Afif al-Din at-Tarniml, 16, 33,
274 .
Ya36, a b. u' ffadh, 77
Yaqut, 27, 37
Yamani, Abi'l-'Abbas, 37
Yazid b. Afu'awiya, 46..47, 202Yemen, 214
YUsuf, 177
YUsuf b. TAshffn,, 21, 22, 33, 63
Ziya Bey, 113 Zohar, 218 Zulayka, 177 Zwemer, SS., 55, 120
naJahat, 161
nafs, 218; al-nafs al-ammara, 107;
al-nafs al-lawama, 107; al-I1afs
al-muhna' ulna, 107,141,174 ; al-nafs
al41afiga, 107, 141 nfsr allah, 108, 140, 222
gibla, 33, 36, 100,. 101, 167 qufb, 29,38

ragib, 169
ride, 173,182
rububiyya, 23, 154, 168
ruff, 141,218 ; al-rah al-'agli, 142, 231;
al-rah al-flkri, 142, 231
sadiq,in, 167, 173
tahrin', 90
talwln, 159 tamkin, 130, tagiid, t6 ldthlith, 213
lawakhul, 116, 166, 168 lawali', 129 tawhid, 64, i66 ff., 191
'ubudiyya, 168
'utlim al-ilhamsyya, 125 flits, 173, 181
wally, 173
wajd, 89, 129, 187, 204 wags, 130, 131, 152
mass!, wasillin, 152, 173, 192, 212 wujud, 89, 108
yagin. 128, 209, 225
zawiva, 27 zuhd, 129
INDEX
Usul al-Din, 62 U~Uli, Abu'l-Fath, 65
Veils (between God and man), 147 ff., 178, 205, 206, 233
Vision, the Beatific, 78, 119, 120, 130, 131, 149, 170, 172, 173, 185, 187 ff., 203 ff., 221 ff.,
230,
1
la-'il'l'. 129
lawamti', 129
38, madrassa, II, 19
121, makan, 174
tnala11di, 114, 128, 213
178,
anag4m, 130, 168
233 mo'rifa, 124, 128, 185
mutahaza, 169
,hulk, 128
mugarrabim, 170
muragaba, 169
murid, 87, 130, 131, 152
161, mushahada, 128, 171
INDEX
sahli, 173 se'ir, 152
salln+, 147
soma al-balm. shauq, 113,,8'1
siral, 76 sir,., 143
247
119
114
131, 174, 209
,66, 167, 181, 182, 205, 228, 231 WUstenfeld, F., 20, 28
II.
TECHNICAL TERMS, ETC.
ahwal, 15
clam al-jabardl, 107, 159, ,6o, 213, 218 'slam al-malah 1t, 107, 114; 159, 16o,
174, 208, 213, 213
'alam al-murk war-shahada, 107,
160, 208, 213, 218 amr, 107, 142, 174
'aql al-awwal, 106
'arif, 173
baga',, 193, 233 basa'ir, 187 basira, 144, 204
dhikr, 170
Jana', 89, 165, 189, 190, 191, 193, 206, 214, 233, 234
faYi, 113
arai at-rubfibiyya, 141
hat, 130, 131 hagq, 171 huquq, 174
huzsiz, 174
ikhlas, 173 ilham, 173

'ilm, 18, 21, 1x4, 128, 210; 'ilnv
al-dkhira, 120; 'llm al-batin, 128;
'ilm al-laduni, iS, 173, 222 ; 'ilm
al-ma'amala, 120; 'illn al-mukashafa,
120; 'iim al-zdhir, 124 'Pill , 177, 206 illiMd, x16, 191, 234 itlisal, 209
jadhba, t6i, 206 jalal, 131 jamal, 131
hhalq, 142
159

AL Ghazali1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

AL Ghazali1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

AL Ghazali1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What is the book about?

What is the book about?

What are the main topics discussed in the book?

What are the main topics discussed in the book?

AL-GHAZALI

Accurate Printers Paisa Akhbar, Lahore

i Ihya. III, pp. 63, 64. IV, P. 85

M. al-Murtadk, lthdf, p. 9. Al. Ride, Abu Maslid, pp. 22, 23,

desire to comprehend the real meaning of things for himself

and he had come to'the conclusion that the greatest hindrance

in the search for truth was the acceptance of beliefs on the

authority of parents and teachers, and a rigid adherence to the

heritage of the past. He remembered the traditional saying

a Jew or a Christian or a Magian," and he was anxious to know

what was that innate disposition before it was affected by un

reasoned.convictions imposed by others. So he set out to secure

a knowledge which left no room for doubt, and involved no

possibility of error or conjecture, and, finding that none of the

knowledge which he had acquired, except that which was based

" Take what you see and let hearsay alone,

to his goal. I It was probably to this period that al-Ghazali was

referring .when he stated: "When I desired to set forth upon

the Sufi Path, and to drink of their wine, I considered my soul

and saw that it was encompassed by many veils. So I retired

into solitude and occupied myself with self-discipline and self

mortification for forty days, and I was given knowledge which

and I considered it, and lo, it contained a legalistic element.

Then I betook myself again to solitude and occupied myself

with discipline and self-mortification for forty days, and then

possessed at first, and I rejoiced in it : then I e,Lamined it and

behold, it contained a speculative element. So I returned

it contained an admixture of knowledge acquired by human

means ('ilm) and so I had not yet overtaken those possessed of

knowledge from on high (al-'alum ai-Laduniyya).' So I realised

made of stone and over the door was carved a dedicatory in

scription, while the interior included an open courtyard, contain

to lectures, nor any limit to the number of lectures that might

be delivered on a given subject. The lecture usually took the

except by written permission, nor could members of the class

make use of the substance of the lecture without the lecturer's

his brother Ahmad to take his place in the Nizamiyya College,

to maintain his family, and in 488 Jro96 he left Baghdad, with

the intention never to return thither.

al-Ghazali had finished speaking, they called the villager and

the peasant explained the matter, they came to al-Ghazali and,

recognising him, surrounded him, requesting him to establish a

and then returned to'Damascus, though al-Ghazali himself does

settled down to a life of seclusion in Damascus, in the mosque

of the 'Umayyads, where he spent much time in prayer and

.him a circle of disciples. Abu'l-Futiih al-Maraghf stated at

a conference in Amul, in Tabaristan, that he had been present

at a gathering in Jerusalem, at the " Cradle of Jesus," a which

included al-Ghazali, Isma`il al-Hakimi, Abu'l-Hasan al-Basri

and Ibrahim al-Shabbak al-Jurjani3 and a large number of pious

strangers, and these verses were improvised, one account says,

you assert to belong to the Quraysh." Shortly afterwards

on the proceeds. One day, as the old woman was passing

are my father, and my mother." He then gave orders that one

Husayn commanded that she should be given a similar amount