Position Paper
Position Paper
Position Paper
Position Paper
Sasha Booker
Professor Jacobs
World Religions
How fairly women have been treated within their religion is a tough topic to navigate for
many reasons, including historic rules turned to comfortable norms, and reforms introduced to
women without seeking the advice of said women. There are in fact, few religions where we can
witness a man and a woman treated equally. This unjust treatment dates way back in history, but
even today, we can see that there are still very few religions that treat women with true equality,
leaving examiners wondering, which came first: unfair treatment towards women, or religious
norms?
While all the great men within all religions were given life by a woman, there it is a very small
percentage of fair treatment towards said women within major religions. It is true that historic religions
including Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism, Christianity and others are now attempting to restore their
misogynistic view of females, however, the majority of these ancient religions started out embarrassingly
sexist. Within the Christian religion, it is said that it was Jesus himself that even saw women as worthy to
join in his presence. “In his inclusive “table fellowship,” he ate with people of all sorts, including
those designated as impure by Jewish law in order to preserve Temple purity. These
marginalized people included all women because of menstruation and childbirth;” Today, it
might seem absurd that a female would be deemed impure because she is capable of childbirth,
There are, of course, some religions that stand out as perhaps a more feminist take on a
woman’s place as a practicing member. Jainism is known as one of these few religions.
Considering how complex a woman’s place is within religion though, it shouldn’t be surprising
that even within the liberal religion, Jainism, a woman’s fate isn’t as simple as “equal.” The
Religious views are somewhat split into two sides: “Digambaras believe that women cannot
become so pure that they could rise to the highest heaven or so impure that they would be reborn
in the lowest hell; they cannot renounce clothes and be naked; they cannot be such skillful
debaters as men; they are of inferior status in society and in the monastic order. They can be
While a perk of being a woman within Digambara practice means that she could not be
considered so impure that she would be reborn into hell, subjectively we must admit, the cons of
being a woman seem to outweigh the pros. Fortunately for those with this similar viewpoint
within the religion, a second branch exists: Shvetambaras. Being a female Shevtambra means
more liberation within the religion, but if a woman is looking for true equality, the scale is still
far from tilted in her favor. “Shvetambaras feel that women are capable of the same spiritual
achievements as men, and that the nineteenth Tirthankara was a woman. In truth, even
Shvetambara nuns are of lower status than monks, but they still comprise the great majority of
Jain nuns.” While it is disappointing that even after achieving such greatness as acquiring nun
Booker 3
status, women as still looked down on compared to monks, still Shvetambara does embrace
In the scheme of all of the mainstream religions out there, it can feel like Shvetambara is
within the small percentage of Religions getting fair treatment of woman right the early on.
Today, we can see the efforts of Catholics trying to rewrite the rules as a necessary adjustment as
“Pope Francis inherited a Roman Catholic Church in which there is controversy over
participation by women (who are not allowed by the Vatican to be priests), and widespread
disregard of existing papal prohibitions on effective birth control, abortion, test-tube conception,
surrogate motherhood, genetic experimentation, divorce, and homosexuality. These topics are
under lively discussion, with considerable resistance to Pope Francis’s liberal views from
conservative Catholic leaders. Liberals argue that contemporary realities force a rethinking of
dogmas such as the traditional Catholic ban on birth control.” (Fisher, Mary Pat. Living
etc., it’s worth pointing out that a man could likely say a certain number of Hail Mary
Certainly worse than recognizing women’s issues too late in the game, is using women as
political pawns by creating new laws banning women from practicing the rituals they believe in.
Let us look at how outsiders like Europeans have treated Islamic women. For example, as of
Considering that these women were taught that modest clothing including face veils and
headscarves are worn to protect them against harm such as molestation, many of us can only
imagine how frightening the idea of being stripped of their security would be to an Islamic
woman. France is not the only ignorant source attempting to “liberate” these women by axing
“Turkey, long home to Ataturk’s secular vision, is now engaged in power struggles
between secularists, devout Muslims, and hardline Islamists. This conflict leads to paradoxical
situations. For instance, women are prohibited from wearing traditional headscarves in
universities. Religiously observant women who do not want to give up their headscarves and
expose their hair publicly are now resorting to an unusual protest measure: Some students are
Booker 5
wearing their headscarves and then jamming wigs over them when they attend classes.” (Fisher,
The question still remains: are these changes occuring because these religions recognize
their treatment towards women has been unethical and care, or because their treatment is
unethical and will no longer been tolerated? For now, we must accept that the silver lining is, the
dialog is out there, and that indicates a change for the better is coming. Here is a message from a
religious woman: We are the ones who know how worthy we feel. We are the ones who know
what as an individual makes us comfortable or uncomfortable to wear. We are the ones who
deserve to reform needed changes. Let us not forget, women are the ones that gave life to
religious me. The men are the ones who made the rules without basis of understanding, with no
thank to their sister or their aunt or their nun. These are the men that took away our voice, told us