PMBok
PMBok
PMBok
Fundamentals
June 2012
1. Name (Nickname)
2. Where do you work?
3. What do you do there?
4. Why are you here?
5. What is your favorite pastime when you
are not working?
2. Effective Implementation
Systems to deliver the Technology
3. Institutional Capability & Capacity — Particularly
Trained & Competent People — to Manage the Implementation
You ALREADY KNOW 1) Your Professional Sector’s TECHNOLOGY
Food for thought: What kind of “profession” can be learned in only five days of classroom
training; and -- even with a Diploma in Project Management attesting to your knowledge
and mastery of PM acronyms, concepts, definitions, knowledge areas and processes --
how competent can you be without specific “hands-on” skills training?
INTRODUCTION:
OVERVIEW OF THE
PROJECT PROCESS GROUPS
& KNOWLEDGE AREAS
A temporary endeavor
undertaken to create a
unique product, service,
or result
- PMBOK® guide
The practice of Project Management (PM) is evolving, leading to two relatively infant
PM-related practices – PPgM (Project Program Management) and PPM (Project
Portfolio Management).
The drivers of adding a layer management for a group of related/unrelated projects:
•Management of “shared resources”
•Strategic alignment of projects with the organization’s business
objectives (from initiation/planning to feedback)
Project Management
(PM)
• What is a “PORTFOLIO”?
– A portfolio is a collection of projects and/or
programs and other work that are grouped
together to facilitate the effective management
of that work to meet strategic business
objectives. The components of a portfolio are
quantifiable (i.e., they can be measured,
ranked, & prioritized).
Ref.: The Standard for Portfolio Management (PMI)
A project terminates
After attaining its
objective.
but
Operational work
continues indefinitely
to sustain the business.
An application of knowledge,
skills, tools and techniques
to project activities to meet
project requirements.
- PMBOK® guide
Risk
Is a combination of
5 Process
Groups,
9 Knowledge
Areas
&
42 Processes
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 39
5 Project Management PROCESS GROUPS
1 Initiation
NOTE: CONCEPTUALLY, PROCESS GROUPS MAY
2 Planning BE SIMILAR TO – BUT NOT SPECIFICALLY THE
SAME AS -- PROJECT LIFE CYCLE STAGES OR
PHASES
3 Execution
5 Closeout
9 Procurement
Project Procurement - Plan Purchases & Acquisitions - Conduct - Contract Administration - Close Contracts
Management Procurements
• 5 9 42
1 1 1 1 2 1
and 3 2
5 Process Groups, 9 Knowledge Areas & 42 Processes 5 1
2 1
• 2 20 8 10 2
1 1 1 1
1 3
1 1 2 1
• 1
6 5 6 3 3 4 5 6 4 5
1 1
1
1 1
9 Knowledge H 4 1 3
Areas
C 5 1 1 2 1
&
42 Processes
R 6 5 1
P 4 1 1 1 1
PHASES &
PROCESS GROUPS . . .
Figure 2.23
• PMBOK’s high level or bird’s eye view of the “entire” project life
cycle
• There is No single way of presenting the project life cycle
• Very general or very detailed
• Industries and organizations have their own preferred life cycles
• Project Life Cycle and Project Phases are parallel in multiphase
project
• REMEMBER: The Project Life Cycle is not the same as the
Project Process Groups or a Product Life Cycle
Cost and staffing and resource levels are low at the start, peak as the
work is carried out, and drop rapidly as the project draws to a close,
but then drags on indefinitely . . . !
Time
Figure 2.25
Adapted form PMBOK Guide
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 50
Project Life Cycle Characteristics
Project Project
Figure 2.27
Time
Adapted form PMBOK Guide
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 52
Project Process Groups
Overlapping Sub-Processes
Stage
Execution
Planning
Initiation Closeout
Controlling
Monitoring &
Controlling
Initiating Processes Closing Processes
to Start a Project or Planning to Exit a Phase or
Enter a Phase End Project
Initiating Closing
Executing
Figure 3.7
Adapted from PMBOK Guide
Project Life
Cycle
Executing sub-project
Figure 3.8 Adapted from PMBOK Guide
TURN
FEASIBILITY DESIGN & IMPLEMENTATION OVER &
STUDY APPROVAL CLOSE OUT
Monitoring and Controlling Monitoring and Controlling Monitoring and Controlling Monitoring and Controlling
ning
ning
ning
ning
Pl a n
Pl a n
Pl a n
Pl a n
Initiating Closing
Initiating Initiating
Closing Initiating
Closing Closing
Exe c
Exe c
Exe c
Exe c
uting
uting
uting
uting
Adapted from PMBOK Guide
Progressive Elaboration
Adapted from PMBOK Guide
Process Specifications
Deliverables
Project Project Prototype Development
Charter Charter Design Review
Test Market
Project
Charter Product Introduction
Project
Charter Product evaluation
Deliverables Deliverables
Develop use-cases & validation doc
4 2
Negotiation & Preparation
Board Approval 3
Preliminary
Detailed Appraisal Preparation
Design Preparation
Or is it only Three? Or Four?
Slide 61
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals
THE ADB PROJECT CYCLE
& Phases
1. Identification
• Medium Term Strategic Framework Development
• Country Operational Strategy Study
• Country Programming Mission
• CSP -> RAP -> BAP
2. Preparation
• Project Preparatory TA
• Fact-Finding Mission
3. Appraisal
• Appraisal Mission
• Preparation of Board Documents (RRP, LA)
Time Action by
1. Identification 1-3 years EA/ ADB
2. Preparation 1-2 years EA
3. Appraisal 9-12 ADB
months
4. Negotiation 1-3 EA/ ADB
months
5.Implementation +/- 6 years EA
6. Evaluation 6 months ADB
1. INITIATING
2. PLANNING
3. EXECUTING (Implementation)
4. Monitoring & Controlling
[NOTE: M&C Included in All Process Groups]
5. CLOSING
- PMBOK® guide
ngni
Plan
Initiating Closing
Exec
ng uti
Monitoring &
Controlling
Initiating Processes Closing Processes
to Start a Project or Planning to Exit a Phase or
Enter a Phase End Project
Initiating Closing
Executing
Figure 3.7
Executing project
Figure 3.8
Adapted from PMBOK Guide
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 68
Project Phases & Process Groups
Monitoring and Controlling Monitoring and Controlling Monitoring and Controlling Monitoring and Controlling
ning
ning
ning
ning
Pl a n
Pl a n
Pl a n
Pl a n
Initiating Closing
Initiating Initiating
Closing Initiating
Closing Closing
Exe c
Exe c
Exe c
Exe c
uting
uting
uting
uting
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 69
Project Life Cycle
Progressive Elaboration
Process Specifications
Deliverables
Project Project Prototype Development
Charter Charter Design Review
Test Market
Project
Charter Product Introduction
Project
Charter Product evaluation
Deliverables Deliverables
Develop use-cases & validation doc
Preliminary Planning
PP Project Concept Initiated
DD Detailed Design
I Executing / Implementing
Implementation
Duration 5 - 7 years
Scope
Quality
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 78
MANAGING THE TRIPLE CONSTRAINTS
Scope Creep:
Expanding the scope
beyond the approved
baseline
PROJECT
SCOPE
PROJECT
SCOPE
PROJECT
SCOPE
PROJECT
SCOPE
Quality
PROJECT
Note: Scope Creep
does not refer to
Lower Quality Authorized changes
because the Baseline
Reduced Scope is updated to include
them.
PEOPLE !!!
A TEAM IS…
A group of people with a high degree of mutual
support and interdependence geared toward
the achievement of a common objective
• Consensus on Objectives
• Mutual Agreement about Individual Roles &
Responsibilities
• Respect for Other Team Members Contributions
• Realistic Work Schedule, Budget and other Resources
• AUTHORITY TO DO THE JOB
• Standard Procedure for day-to-day operation
• System to Monitor Performance and Adjust to Reflect
Needs of any Change in the Situation
• Mechanism for Maintaining External Support
a 4 "Thinking" person?
b 1 "Feeling" person?
1a to 8a 1b to 8b 9a to 16a 9b to 16b
T F P J
NOTE: The total for each letter T, F, P, & J ranges from 0 to 40.
Each pair of letters — “T + F” and “P + J” — should also total 40.
IF NOT, YOU HAVE MADE AN ARITHMETIC ERROR!!
FJ TJ TP or FP
2. Write the letters on a “post-it” note
and stick it on your Name Tag.
F
40
FP FJ
P J
40 0 40
TP TJ
40
T
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 96
ASSESSMENT
SCORE RANGE INTERPRETATION
0 - 10 Considerable Weakness
11 - 15 Definite Weakness
16 - 18 Some Weakness
19 - 21 BALANCE
22 - 24 Some Strength
25 - 29 Definite Strength
30 - 40 Considerable Strength
TJ
TP
FJ
FP
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 100
Interpretation P – PROCESS ORIENTED
Strengths Weaknesses
Compromises Indecisive
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 101
Interpretation J – JOB ORIENTED 1
Strengths Weaknesses
Makes Detailed Plans Often Inflexible,
Not Adaptable to Change
Makes Quick Decisions Snap Judgments --
Often Uninformed
[Fails to read instructions, or
seek help — even when
available]
Directs/Orders Stubborn, Uncompromising
Controlling Judgmental
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 102
Interpretation J – JOB ORIENTED 2
Strengths Weaknesses
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 103
General Guidelines 1
People with similar strengths in the same dimensions
usually get along well together and tend to reach
job-oriented decisions quickly — particularly if they
agree with each other. However, TJs particularly
may experience major difficulties if they disagree —
because they always think they are right; therefore
anyone who disagrees must be wrong! Decisions
may also suffer if most team members have similar
strengths because of similar blind spots.
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 104
General Guidelines 2
People with strengths in different dimensions often
have difficulty accepting the views, opinions and
actions of others at the outset, and often openly
disagree on many issues. However, decisions
resulting from such interactions are usually
stronger because of the diverse perspectives.
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 105
General Guidelines 3
People are usually over-sensitive to criticism in
their weak areas, and often prefer to avoid
them — particularly FPs. Conflicts often
occur when they are forced to do so, or when
others point out their deficiencies.
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 106
General Guidelines 4
Rather than being right or wrong, many conflicts
arise because of differences in personal styles.
Before rejecting inputs which conflict with your
own, try to view the situation from the other
person’s perspective.
Project Teams should be balanced with mixtures of
different types.
Job/Task-oriented groups, and individuals (of all
types) should consult with people of opposite
types before finalizing decisions.
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 107
General Guidelines 5
When people must interact frequently, those with
greater “power” in the situation should make an
extra effort to become aware of and accommodate
the styles of the others.
People should try to strengthen their weaker
dimensions and be more receptive to others of the
opposite persuasion.
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 108
“Smith Grid”©
Personal Working Style F
Attribute Typology 40
FP FJ
P 40 0 40
J
TP TJ
40
T
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 109
Organize Project Teams
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 110
The Life Cycle of Teams
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 111
GROUP/TEAM LIFE CYCLE DYNAMICS
The “Storming-Norming” Model
Groups go through FIVE stages:
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 112
Group / Team Life Cycle
Dynamics
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 113
Teambuilding Activities
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 114
PROJECT INITIATION
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 115
INITIATION & SCOPING TECHNIQUES
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 116
Introduction to the
PROBLEM TREE TECHNIQUE
for Preliminary Scoping
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 117
Problem Tree
• “Logic Visualization”
• A proven technique for
better problem definition
– also called “why-why”,
“cause and effect”
– used widely in re-engineering
improvement programs -
private and public sector
How
many How many
familiar USE (have
with it? used) it?
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 118
Dealing with Project Problem Trees
• A tree has a visible trunk topped with branches,
and roots that are often fully (or sometimes
partly) hidden from view
• A situation often has a very evident core
problem (trunk), and effects (branches) which
all stem from its causes (roots)
• Core problem situations can only be
resolved by tackling their root causes -- not
simply applying palliatives to the visible trunk or
its branches (apparent effects)
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 119
Logic Visualization
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 120
Problem Tree Development
Effects:
The Problem:
Causes:
Root Causes:
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 121
Problem Tree Example
Low economic
growth
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 122
Low economic
growth
Lack of private
sector
investment
Just tracing
one problem
path only
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 123
Low economic
growth
Lack of private
sector
investment
Industries lack
access to power
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 124
Low economic
growth
Lack of private
sector
investment
Industries lack
access to power
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 125
Low economic Lower than desired
growth employment
Lack of private
sector investment
Industries lack
access to power
High
Insufficient power
transmission
stations
losses
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 126
Guidelines for preparing Problem Trees
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 127
PROBLEM TREE
TEAM EXERCISE
“Your Project”
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 128
TEAM Exercise
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 131
Solution / Objective Tree
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 132
PROBLEM TREE
Low economic
HIGH economic
growth
growth
Lack of private
ADEQUATE
sector
Private sector
investment
investment
Industries lack
access to
Industries HAVE
access
power
to power
Insufficient
SUFFICIENT
power stations
power stations
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 133
SOLUTION/OBJECTIVE
TREE
HIGH economic
growth
ADEQUATE
Private sector
investment
Industries HAVE
access to power
SUFFICIENT
power stations
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 134
Solution / Objective Tree
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 135
Solution Tree
Effects:
The Solution:
Outputs
Activities
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 136
Solution / Objective Tree
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 137
Objective Tree
Effects:
Can Do
Partial Solution:
Out of
Scope
Outputs
Activities
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 138
Consider Alternative Solutions
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 139
Reality Check
• Do we have the
people with
necessary expertise
to do the work?
• Are they willing to
commit to doing work,
barring any
scheduling problem?
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 140
Reality Check
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 141
Reality Check
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 142
Which of the several possible courses
of action below the Problem Statement
could be pursued?
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 143
TEAM Activity
© 2012 Dr. Kenneth F. Smith, PMP Project Management Fundamentals Slide 144