31.0 Thermal Considerations: 31.1 Computer Finite Element Analysis
31.0 Thermal Considerations: 31.1 Computer Finite Element Analysis
31.0 Thermal Considerations: 31.1 Computer Finite Element Analysis
Rigorous analysis isn't normally a practical problem for several reasons. One is
that we are somewhat conditioned to accept thermal conditions that have existed
in vacuum tube guitar amplifiers for many decades.
Finite element analysis programs were once extremely expensive, limiting their
usage to corporations (or very affluent engineers). That situation has changed
now and freeware is even available. Freeware tools are not for average people,
in my opinion. These are mostly basic packages developed with an assumption
that the user has prior experience and knowledge of FEA, and are limited in
application.
This analysis was performed with LISA, a popular and inexpensive FEA
application. Note that the predicted temperatures, as with most FEA applications
are in degrees Kelvin. For those more comfortable with other scales:
The vacuum tube thermal models were developed separately with LISA then
imported and merged into the chassis model. For simplification, vacuum tube
thermal models did not include most of the internal details because they are
second-order heat contributors (or even third-order). The major heat sources are
the plates, cathodes and filaments of the power vacuum tube models.
Here are some of the conditions assumed for the FEA simulation.
This is a view of the amplifier chassis (enclosure not shown) as depicted by LISA
after meshing:
After applying heat generation, convection and radiation properties to the FEA
model the simulation was performed, the results of which are described below.
Temperature color codes, temperature scales and the "cutting plane" are user-
defined in this particular FEA application. As expected, maximum temperatures
are found within these two vacuum tubes.