Dimensioning tool

for flexible ring net

barriers against
debris flows

Software Manual

DEBFLOW
Date: 28.04.2017
Debris flow protection

Subject to change without

notice.

© Geobrugg AG
CH-8590 Romanshorn
Software manual DEBFLOW Seite 2 / 23

PREFACE

Thank you for using DEBFLOW, the dimensioning tool for flexible ring net barriers against debris flows
established by the Geobrugg AG, Geohazard Solutions. Every effort is made to give you the best possible
support for the dimensioning of our flexible debris flow protection systems.

DEBFLOW offers you the possibility of considering a dynamic impact of a debris flow wave into the ring net
and the corresponding static load case of a filled and overtopped barrier. Additionally, a first rough estimation
of the retention volume can be carried out. The calculations are based on International Units in English and
German.

This manual provides you with the most important references and function descriptions to enable you to use
the program correctly. Please read the operating instructions carefully prior using the program for the first
time. Keep this reference book close at hand at all times.

Numerous parameters need to be entered for the dimensioning operations. It is the responsibility of the user
of this program to select and enter these parameters correctly.

Rico Brändle
Geobrugg AG

April 2017
Software manual DEBFLOW Seite 3 / 23

PRODUCT LIABILITY

Rockfall, landslides, debris flows or avalanches are sporadic and unpredictable. Causes can be e.g. human
(construction, etc.) or environmental (weather, earthquakes, etc.). Due to the multiplicity of factors affecting
such events it is not and cannot be an exact science that guarantees the safety of individuals and property.

However, by the application of sound engineering principles to a predictable range of parameters and by the
implementation of correctly designed protection measures in identified risk areas the risks of injury and loss
of property can be reduced substantially.

Inspection and maintenance of such systems are an absolute requirement to ensure the desired protection
level. The system safety can also be impaired by events such as natural disasters, inadequate dimensioning
parameters or failure to use the prescribed standard components, systems and original parts; and/or
corrosion (caused by pollution of the environment or other man-made factors as well as other external
influences).

DISCLAIMER

1. The programs are only approved for preliminary designs and preliminary projects. Both the input
parameters and output values must always be checked and confirmed by a specialist. All values are average
values; they have to be checked and confirmed on project base before any application of a Geobrugg
system.

Geobrugg cannot be held liable for damages of all kind - namely direct or indirect damages, cost of defects
and damages due to defects, losses or costs - which occur by using wrong assumptions or input parameters.

2. All information and data included in the programs are based on the principles, equations and safety
concepts according to the technical documents, dimensioning concepts, product manuals, installation
instructions, etc. of Geobrugg which have to be strictly followed.

Geobrugg cannot be held liable for damages of all kind - namely direct or indirect damages, cost of defects
and damages due to defects, losses or costs - which occur due to incorrect application of the programs.

3. It cannot totally be excluded that there are errors in the programs.

Geobrugg cannot be held liable for damages of all kind - namely direct or indirect damages, cost of defects
and damages due to defects, losses or costs - which occur due to application of faulty programs.

4. Changes in the data of the programs by the user can lead to results which do not comply with the safety
regulations given by the law and Geobrugg.

Geobrugg cannot be held liable for damages of all kind which result from changes made by the user.
Geobrugg is indemnified and hold harmless by the user from any claims of third parties.
Software manual DEBFLOW Seite 4 / 23

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 5
2. The Geobrugg VX/UX debris flow protection systems.............................................................................. 6
3. Testing of the components in 1:1 field tests and calibration of finite element model ............................... 7
4. Access to the online-tool ........................................................................................................................... 8
5. The software ........................................................................................................................................... 11
6. Conclusions............................................................................................................................................. 22
References ...................................................................................................................................................... 23
Software manual DEBFLOW Seite 5 / 23

1. INTRODUCTION

The software DEBFLOW serves to dimension flexible debris flow protection systems consisting of the high-
tensile steel wire ring net ROCCO®, support ropes with a determined number of brake rings, flexible spiral
rope anchors and a specially designed abrasion protection device.

The software DEBFLOW is based on FARO [9] simulations of each standard barrier system for the given
debris flow input parameters. The design concept is described in [11].
The DEBFLOW concept analyzes the stability of the chosen barrier system and calculates the appearing
dynamic and hydrostatic forces during the filling process and the overtopping.

The dimensioning of the anchors in the slopes has to be carried out carefully and respect the prevailing
geological circumstances. Anchor forces up to 350 kN have to be transmittable into the slopes.

Figure 1: Application of ring net barriers as an additional building to a concrete check dam in the Illgraben in
Canton Valais in Switzerland (left) and a successfully filled ring net barrier in Italy (right).
Software manual DEBFLOW Seite 6 / 23

2. THE GEOBRUGG VX/UX DEBRIS FLOW PROTECTION SYSTEMS

The VX debris flow protection system has been developed by Geobrugg AG and in essence consists of the
following elements: The support ropes with its brake rings to absorb the energy while the debris flow impact,
the ROCCO® ring net which is clamed between the support ropes, border ropes at each site of the slope and
finally the additional abrasion protection (see figure 2).

Figure 2: Components of a flexible VX barrier installed in the Illgraben in 2005.

The UX protection system has nearly the same construction design. The important difference is that the UX
system is used for larger torrent widths and so posts are necessary keeping the barrier height when the
barrier gets filled [10].

The ring net of ROCCO® mesh has openings of 300 mm in size and depending on the standard system a
different number of windings. The support ropes used for this application consist of high-tensile steel wire
ropes. These support ropes are fixed in the slope with spiral rope anchors or TITAN self-drilling anchors with
special flexible heads, which ensure that forces not working directly in the pulling direction can also be
transmitted. To protect the upper ropes from abrasion, an angle profile was developed and is fixed with
shackles to the upper ropes. So, also overtopping of filled barriers is possible without any damages on the
structural system.
To increase the limited retention volume of one barrier, so called “multilevel barriers”, barriers installed in line
are possible. With multilevel barriers arbitrary retention volumes can be achieved. One example for multilevel
barriers is the installation of 13 barriers at the Hasliberg Region in the Bernese Alpes in Switzerland (see
figure 3). The total retention volume of several barriers in line can be roughly calculated with the DEBFLOW
software tool. But the most accurate method to estimate the retention volume is by laser scanning of the river
bed and creating a 3D model.
If there are more or less muddy debris flows expected with small corn sizes, a secondary mesh can be
added additionally to the ROCCO® 300 mm mesh size. This secondary mesh is not decisive for the
dimensioning concept and is so not taken into account in the DEBFLOW software tool.
Software manual DEBFLOW Seite 7 / 23

Figure 3: Multilevel barriers in the Hasliberg region in the Bernese Alpes.

3. TESTING OF THE COMPONENTS IN 1:1 FIELD TESTS AND CALIBRATION OF

FINITE ELEMENT MODEL

All the barrier components were tested in 1:1 field tests against debris flows. The measured results in the
field tests led to a calibrated finite element model with the Software FARO created by Dr. Axel Volkwein at
the WSL [9]. All the standard barriers were calculated with this simulation tool. More information about the
field tests with debris flow barriers and the development of the finite element model is described in [11].

Figure 4: Test barrier in the Illgraben with a granular debris flow front arriving (left) and overtopping of the
debris flow barrier (right).

Figure 5: Finite element model in FARO of the test barrier in the Illgraben.
Software manual DEBFLOW Seite 8 / 23

4. ACCESS TO THE ONLINE-TOOL

Our hompage www.geobrugg.com offers the access to the online software.

After clicking on the top right corner to “myGeobrugg” the below shown window appears, which offers the
possibilities of the first-time personal registration, the Login and the function of the delivery of the forgotten
password per e-mail.

If the program is used the first time one must click on “register here" and the registration form should be filled
out once. Afterwards one will get the personal user name and password automatically sent per e-mail.
Software manual DEBFLOW Seite 9 / 23

With the so gotten personal login it can be logged in to “myGeobrugg”:

One can choose between the following dimensioning software packages:

RUVOLUM® Online Tool

The dimensioning tool for the TECCO® and SPIDER® slope stabilization system, in German, English,
Spanish, Polish, Portuguese, Romanic, Russian, Chinese und French.

SPIDER®
The dimensioning tool for the SPIDER® rock protection system in German and English.

DEBFLOW
The dimensioning tool for flexible ring net barriers against debris flows, in German, English, Spanish,
Russian and Chinese.

SHALLSLIDE
The dimensioning tool for flexible barriers against shallow landslides in German and English.
Software manual DEBFLOW Seite 10 / 23

When starting the online tool, there is first a disclaimer to be accepted:

There is no installation of the software on the user’s computer neither necessary nor possible. The software
has to be used online only. It does not offer any possibilities to save calculations or results for reloading or
optimizing purposes.
Every calculation can be stored as a pdf with all information about input quantities, elements of the system,
number of nails and the proofs of bearing safety included.
Software manual DEBFLOW Seite 11 / 23

5. THE SOFTWARE
The software is structured in a one-page-format as follows:

Title

Print preview and pdf

Input Parameters (the debris flow parameters)

 Choice of three different load cases possible
 Type and density of the expected debris flow
 Total volume
 Expected number of waves
 Expected peak discharge or empirically calculated peak discharge
 Global safety factor

Summary of results concerning the retention volume

 Checking of retention volume compared to required retention volume

Barrier specific input parameter for each selected barrier

 Height of selected barrier
 Span width of the upper support ropes
Barrier geometry
 Span width of the lower support ropes
 Distance to previous barrier (in case of multilevel barriers)
 River bed inclination
Torrent geometry
 Inclination angle of the deposition (to calculate the retention volume)
 Calculated or expected front velocity
 Calculation of the flow height Flow parameters
 Recommended maximum basal opening height

Choice of the standard barrier system

 Proof of geometric barrier design data compared to geometry of standard systems

Proofs of maximum dynamic loading (stopping process)

 Proof of dynamic loading compared to resistance of barrier
 Resistance depends on the chosen standard system and the global safety factor
 Dynamic loading depends on the debris flow input parameters and the flow parameters

Proofs of static loading (overtopping)

 Calculation of the static loading depending on the chosen system
 Checking the resistance of the barrier against the hydrostatic debris pressure

Proof of the chosen standard system

 Checking of dynamic load case
 Checking of static load case
 Checking of all given load cases (Loadcase 1, 2 and 3)
 Checking of geometrical parameter
Activation of the next projected barrier in case of a multilevel barrier system

Calculation of the overall retention volume of all selected barriers

Software manual DEBFLOW Seite 12 / 23

5.1 Print preview and pdf

Activating the button “Print preview” another window in the preview window appears offering the possibility to
introduce further information in the headline or in the footer of the output, respectively. This might be for
instance an appendix number, the project name, project number, name of the user or date, etc.

Figure 6: Creation of the pdf file after the calculation.

Figure 7: Window with the possibility to input information in the header or in the footer of the output.
Software manual DEBFLOW Seite 13 / 23

After, to finally create a pdf, the “Generate PDF” button has to be activated. This may take a minute.

Figure 8: Creation of a pdf.

What could be the problem,

if no pdf can be created and stored after pressing the „Export“ button ?

In this case, a popup may be blocked. Using the right mouse button, the settings can be changed for
accepting popups temporarily at least. The print preview window disappears after. Thus, to create a pdf, the
instructions above have to be followed again.
Software manual DEBFLOW Seite 14 / 23

Figure 9: Temporarily acceptation of popups has to be activated.

If popups are allowed and the pdf window does not open (see figure 13) press the “refresh” bottom F5. Close
the window and try it again. Normally it should work afterwards.

Refresh or “f5“ bottom!

Figure 10: Print error message and possibility to solve the problem.
Software manual DEBFLOW Seite 15 / 23

5.2 Input Parameters

5.2.1 Debris flow parameters

Debris flows behave different all over the world and may not even act in the same manner in one torrent.
Therefore a range of input parameters can be specified for the software tool DEBFLOW which seem to be
common. These ranges of input parameters are shown in the following Table 1.

Parameters Short sign [ ] Default value Minimum value Maximum value

Density granular flow ρgranular [kg/m3] 2200 1900 2300
Density muddy flow Ρmudflow [kg/m3] 1800 1600 2000
Debris flow volume Vtotal [m3] 1000 100 10000
Number of surges N [-] 3 1 10
Volume of first surge VN,1 [m3] 3000 10 10000
Peak discharge QP [m3/s] 50 1 100

Table 1: Debris flow input parameters

More about how to choose the input parameter of debris flow can be found in several articles like [12] or [11].
These input parameters can be varied for three different kinds of load cases.

5.2.2 Load cases

In the program three different kinds of load cases can be chosen (see figure 14). This option is necessary, if
different load cases appear and have to be considered.

Example:
Two load cases have to be considered

 Mudflow, release volume ≈ 2000 m3 in three surges, density ρ ≈ 1800 kg/m3 with high velocity v = 9
m/s

 Granular flow, release volume ≈1000 m3 in two surges,, density ρ ≈ 2200 kg/m3 with slower velocity v
= 3 m/s

 Optional load case 3

For every load case the discharge will be calculated empirically based on Rickenmann [7]. But if you have
better information about peak discharge data you can choose your own decisive value in the program
directly after the proposed value. If you don’t have any experiences in evaluate the peak discharge please
set Qp=Qp,rec.
Software manual DEBFLOW Seite 16 / 23

Evaluated and chosen

peak discharge values
Qp,rec and Qp

Figure 11: Choice of load cases for different kind of expected debris flow events.

The velocity can also be chosen in a different way for every load case. The decisive load case is determined
by the DEBFLOW software afterwards. More about the barrier design input parameters is written in Chapter
5.2.4 and the later necessary decisive barrier design is shown in Chapter 5.2.5.

Different load case for the

design
 decisive one taken for
design

Figure 12: Velocity input for different load cases.

Software manual DEBFLOW Seite 17 / 23

5.2.3 Global safety factor

The global safety factor SF can be chosen between 1.0 up to 1.5 depending on the risk potential in case of
damages [11].

Please choose the safety factor very carefully and in accordance with the respective rules and regulations in
your country. If there is no recommendation available and for the risk to death of humans is high, the safety
factor has to set to SF=1.5!

5.2.4 Input parameters for the barrier design

5.2.4.1 Geometry of barrier location

Most of these parameters influence the later chosen standard barrier system. The range of application is
shown in Table 2.

Parameters Short sign [ ] Default value Minimum value Maximum value

System height H0 [m] 4 2 6
Width of torrent at the bottom bu [m] 10 4 12
Width of torrent at the top bo [m] 15 6 25
Distance to previous barrier Lo [m] 500 5 500
upstream
river bed inclination Is [%] 18 5 80
Deposition inclination of filled Is’ [%] 12 0 80
barrier

Table 2: Geometric parameters for the projected installation place.

If the minimum value L0 = 5.0 m is selected, the impact velocity of the flow is reduced to
vred=0.4·max(vbase;vstr) (see figure 18) according to the performed laboratory tests [13]. Because of the
overflowing process the impact velocity to next barrier is reduced.
5.2.4.2 Calculation of retention capacity

With values of table 2 and the fixed barrier inclination ξ (barrier always 5 ° inclined in forward) the
approximately retention capacity of each barrier is calculated. If the length of the retained material L1, L2,…>
L0,1,L0.2…, the retention capacity is influenced by the next barrier upstream and DEBFLOW software is
considering this in the retention capacity. The maximum length of the retained material is then L1, L2,…=
L0,1,L0.2….

Retention
volume
Figure 13: Calculation of retention capacity of entered barrier.
Software manual DEBFLOW Seite 18 / 23

5.2.4.3 Impact flow parameters

The flow parameters are important to calculate the impact force of the debris flow surge impacting the
barrier. Caused by resistance of flexible barriers and very high impact forces there are the following
limitations for the design of impact velocity:

Parameters Short sign [ ] Default value Minimum value Maximum value

Chosen front velocity v [m/s] 3 1 10

Table 3: Flow specific input parameters for every barrier location

Debris flow front velocities can be determined out of curve deposit, river bed inclination and deposit behavior
in general. But therefore an explicit reconstruction of a past event is necessary. If you don’t have any
information about front velocities, please take the empirical calculated values the DEBFLOW program
advices you! The first velocity value is based on empirical values published by Rickenmann [7] and the
second check of flow velocity is done with vstr based on Japanese Guidelines for debris flow [8] (based on a
Strickler flow regime).

Based on the condition of continuity, the flow height of the debris flow hfl is determined out of the flow velocity
and the channel width at the bottom. A maximal possible value for the basal opening hd is proposed by
DEBFLOW calculated out of the determined flow height hfl.

Empirical calculation of v based

on Rickenmann

Proof of v with Japanese

Guidelines (based on Strickler)

Choice of v for the dynamic calculation

Figure 14: Calculation of flow velocity and entry value.

L1=L0= 5 m

Choice of v for the dynamic calculation

Figure 15: Calculation of flow velocity vred for very closed barriers.
Software manual DEBFLOW Seite 19 / 23

5.2.5 Choice of the decisive standard barrier system

An overview of the standard systems and their design and geometrical limitations are shown in Table 4. For
the standard drawings of the barriers please contact us per e-mail: [email protected]

Standard barrier max Height Hmax max width top bo.,max max width bottom bu,max
system [m] [m] [m]
Type VX080-H4 4 15 6
Type VX140-H4 4 15 6
Type VX100-H6 6 15 8
Type VX160-H6 6 15 8

Type UX100-H4 4 25 10
Type UX160-H4 4 25 10
Type UX120-H6 6 25 12
Type UX180-H6 6 25 12

Table 4: Standard systems based on FARO simulations.

The first number is the intensity of the debris flow surge acting on the width of the barrier and the second
number describes the height of the barrier. The VX systems are without posts for smaller sections and the
UX with two posts in the middle for wider flow sections. You can only choose the standard system which fits
to your geometric input values. If the standard barrier you have chosen is too weak for the debris flow
loading, the DEBFLOW software tells you that the proof of the barrier is not fulfilled. In this case you have to
choose a stronger standard barrier.

Figure19: Example for a too weak barrier at the static loading case for load case 1.
Software manual DEBFLOW Seite 20 / 23

5.2.6 Calculation of multilevel barriers

If you want to calculate several barriers in line, you have first to activate the second barrier after the
successful input of the first one (see figure 20).

Figure 20: Activation of barrier 2 after the successful calculation of the barrier at location 1.
After design of the second barrier you have to continue with barrier 3 until you will achieve your desired
retention volume. The overview of the retention volume of each barrier compared to the required retention
volume is shown in DEBFLOW. An example for two barriers is shown in Figure 21. Every safety factor of
each barrier is checked with the chosen global safety factor. If each safety factor of each barrier is equal or
bigger than the chosen global safety factor the complete multilevel barrier is fulfilled. If also the required
retention capacity is fulfilled all the calculations are fulfilled (see figure 22).

Total retention volume is

larger than the required
retention volume
Figure 16: Checking of the required retention volume with two barriers.
Software manual DEBFLOW Seite 21 / 23

SFglobal

SFmin

SFglobal < SF min

fulfilled

Vr,tot > Vtot,maxi

fulfilled

Figure 17: Checking of the complete entered barrier system (safety factors, retention volume).
Software manual DEBFLOW Seite 22 / 23

6. CONCLUSIONS

 DEBFLOW covers STANDARD TYPE debris flow barriers with flexible ring nets for muddy and
granular debris flow within certain limits
 Proof of barrier resistance is given for stopping of the front, filling of the barrier and overflowing
 Proof of standard channel retention geometries is given

The program should be used as a quick and reliable calculation in the earliest planning stage. If some
parameters of the barrier do not correspond to standard barrier parameters, a solution may still be possible!
Please contact your Geobrugg agent for a design proposal.
Software manual DEBFLOW Seite 23 / 23

REFERENCES

[1] De Natale, J.S. et al. (1996). Response of the Geobrugg cable net system to debris flow loading,
report by California Polytechnic State University.

[2] Duffy, J.D., Peila, A. (1999). Case studies on debris and mudslide barrier systems in California.

[3] Mitzuyama et al. (1992). Prediction of debris flow peak discharge, Interpraevent, Bern, Bd. 4, 99-108.

[4] Muraishi, H., Sano, S. (1997). Full scale rockfall test of ring net barrier and components.

[5] Philips, C. J. and Davies, T. R. H. (1991). Determing rheological parameters of debris flow material.
Geomorphology, 4:101-110.

[6] PWRI (1988). Technical Standard for measures against debris flows (draft), Ministry of Construction,
Japan.

[7] Rickenmann, D. (1999). Empirical relationships for debris flows, Natural Hazards, 19(1), 47-77.

[8] Rickenmann, D. (2001). Estimation of debris flow impact on flexible wire rope barriers, Birmensdorf,
interner Bericht, unpublished.

[9] Volkwein, A. (2004). Numerische Simulation von flexiblen Steinschlagschutzsystemen.

[10] Wendeler, C., B. W. McArdell, D. Rickenmann, A. Volkwein, A. Roth, and M. Denk (2006). Testing
and numerical modeling of flexible debris flow barriers. In Zhang, M. and H. Wang: Proc. Of the sixth
International Conference on Physical Modeling in Geotechnics, pp. 1573-1578. Balkema.

[11] Wendeler, C. (2009). Loading approach for flexible debris flow barriers, in preparation.

[12] Iverson, R. M. (1997). The physics of debris flow. Rev. Geophysics, 35(3): 245-296.

[13] Speerli, J., R. Hersperger (2009). Murgangmodellierung Geobrugg, Bericht des IBU Hochschule für
Technik Rapperswil.