Zero Gravity Chair Bed Bath Beyond Complaint
Zero Gravity Chair Bed Bath Beyond Complaint
Zero Gravity Chair Bed Bath Beyond Complaint
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
FAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT
CASE NO. 18-CI-
V ELECTRONCIALLY FILED
COMPLAINT
And
COMES NOW, Plaintiff, by and through counsel, Smith, O’Toole & Brooke and for his cause
of action states:
SYNOPSIS
1. This suit involves a claim for the defective design, manufacture and ultimate failure of a
zero gravity chair purchased by Plaintiff that completely gave way when Plaintiff collapsed
back onto the chair resulting in Plaintiff suffering grievous injuries including paralysis and
various debilitating medical issues that arose as a result of the injury sustained as a direct
and proximate result of the defective design and/or manufacture resulting in the ultimate
COM : 000001 of 000011
2. The specific defects of the chair, include, but are not limited to:
Page 1 of 11
Filed 18-CI-03522 10/05/2018 Vincent Riggs, Fayette Circuit Clerk
Filed 18-CI-03522 10/05/2018 NOT ORIGINAL
Vincent Riggs, Fayette Circuit Clerk DOCUMENT
10/08/2018 01:26:39 PM
CourthouseNews-1
weakening, and/or total system failure when any part of the component fails as a
b. Manufacturing defects that resulted in the bungee cord failing after only 1 season
outdoors, being weakened so much that the product was unsafe to use as
intended;
c. Design defects in the framing of the chair that resulted in premature rusting and
or deterioration of the bungee cords involved and contributed to the total failure
of the chair in the manner that was the direct and proximate cause of Plaintiff’s
injuries;
rusting and deterioration of the bungee cords involved and contributed to the
total failure of the chair in the manner that was the direct and proximate cause of
e. Other defects in design and/or manufacture may be discovered as the matter may
proceed and may have contributed to the failure of the chair that caused the
4. Defendant Bed Bath & Beyond Of Lexington Inc. is a Kentucky corporation with its
COM : 000002 of 000011
registered agent, Corporation Service Company, located at 421 West Main Street,
Page 2 of 11
Filed 18-CI-03522 10/05/2018 Vincent Riggs, Fayette Circuit Clerk
Filed 18-CI-03522 10/05/2018 NOT ORIGINAL
Vincent Riggs, Fayette Circuit Clerk DOCUMENT
10/08/2018 01:26:39 PM
CourthouseNews-1
Frankfort, KY 40601 and does business in Fayette County Kentucky at the Bed Bath &
5. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. is a Foreign Corporation with its registered agent, Prentice Hall
Corporation System, Inc. located at 421 West Main St., Frankfort, KY 40601.
6. Upon information and belief, Zenghua International Co. Ltd. Is the manufacture of the
defective product in question in this matter and is located in Chengxi new Zone,
7. Upon information and belief Trademark Global, LLC is the manufacturer and/or
distributor of the defective product in question in this matter and a Foregin Limited
Liability Company with its registered agent, Corporation Service Company, located at 421
8. Upon information and belief, Caravan Canopy Int’l, Inc. is a California Corporation, selling
goods, including the product in question in this matter, in Kentucky, with its principal
9. John Doe Defendants 1-20 are placeholder Defendants that include manufacturers,
distributors and/or sellers of the various components of the zero gravity chair specifically
including the design of the chair, the selection of the materials used in the manufacture
of the chair, and the manufacture of the components that are used in the chair, that are
completely unknowable by the Plaintiff at this time but will be discoverable through the
process of discovery.
COM : 000003 of 000011
Page 3 of 11
Filed 18-CI-03522 10/05/2018 Vincent Riggs, Fayette Circuit Clerk
Filed 18-CI-03522 10/05/2018 NOT ORIGINAL
Vincent Riggs, Fayette Circuit Clerk DOCUMENT
10/08/2018 01:26:39 PM
CourthouseNews-1
10. Venue is proper in Fayette County because the injury occurred in Fayette County, the
chair was purchased in Fayette County and at least one of the Defendants has a physical
location in Fayette County and several of the Defendants do business in Fayette County.
11. Jurisdiction is proper in Fayette Circuit Court because the amount in controversy exceeds
$5,000 and Fayette Circuit Court is a court of general jurisdiction, and the parties have all
subjected them to the jurisdiction of the Kentucky courts as a result of doing business in
Kentucky.
FACTS
12. Plaintiff purchased a zero gravity chair from Sam’s Club in Lexington, Kentucky.
13. Plaintiff purchased a zero gravity chair from Bed Bath & Beyond in Lexington, Kentucky.
15. The zero gravity chair was defective in the following ways:
a. The entire support of the chair was dependent on bungee cords that were prone
to weakening when exposed to weather which directly caused the collapse of the
b. The frame of the chair was prone to rusting prematurely as a result of poor
COM : 000004 of 000011
bungee cord and ultimate failure of the chair which caused Plaintiff’s injuries.
Page 4 of 11
Filed 18-CI-03522 10/05/2018 Vincent Riggs, Fayette Circuit Clerk
Filed 18-CI-03522 10/05/2018 NOT ORIGINAL
Vincent Riggs, Fayette Circuit Clerk DOCUMENT
10/08/2018 01:26:39 PM
CourthouseNews-1
c. The overall design of the bungee cord system of the chair with no fail safe
measures to prevent the complete collapse of the chair if one part of the bungee
cord failed contributed to the ultimate failure of the chair which caused Plaintiff’s
injuries.
d. Plaintiff reserves the right to conduct further discovery and have expert review of
the chair manufacture and design to determine what other defects in design,
16. Plaintiff, a 67 year old man, had just finished a 20 mile bike ride when he came home,
went to his back patio and collapsed onto the zero gravity chair he purchased from Bed
17. When Plaintiff collapsed onto the zero gravity chair the chair completely gave way and
18. The force of the impact broke Plaintiff’s back and caused further extensive injuries, pain,
19. Plaintiff lived alone, and he laid paralyzed on his deck for 7 days before his regular Uber
driver checked in on him after not seeing him for several days and discovered him on the
patio.
20. The Uber driver called 911 and Plaintiff was taken to St. Joseph’s Hospital where he was
21. Plaintiff coded several times but survived with treatment from St. Joseph’s Hospital.
Page 5 of 11
Filed 18-CI-03522 10/05/2018 Vincent Riggs, Fayette Circuit Clerk
Filed 18-CI-03522 10/05/2018 NOT ORIGINAL
Vincent Riggs, Fayette Circuit Clerk DOCUMENT
10/08/2018 01:26:39 PM
CourthouseNews-1
22. Plaintiff was hospitalized for months, then spent time at Cardinal Hill, and then at
Diversicare because he was completely unable to care for himself as a result of the injuries
he incurred.
23. To this day Plaintiff is a shadow of himself, although he can now walk gingerly, he is
completely unable to perform any complex physical activity aside from a very ginger and
slow walk.
24. Plaintiff was an elite athlete, a five time all SEC high jumper, which is likely the only thing
25. Plaintiff continued to maintain himself in excellent physical condition throughout his life.
26. Plaintiff is no longer capable of doing any of the physically exerting activities he used to
COUNT I
NEGLIGENCE
MANUFACTURER
27. Plaintiff incorporates by reference paragraphs 1-26 as though fully restated herein.
28. At all relevant times Defendants, Zenghua International Co. Ltd., Trademark Global, LLC,
Caravan Canopy International Inc., and/or John Doe Defendants 1-20 owed a duty to
Page 6 of 11
Filed 18-CI-03522 10/05/2018 Vincent Riggs, Fayette Circuit Clerk
Filed 18-CI-03522 10/05/2018 NOT ORIGINAL
Vincent Riggs, Fayette Circuit Clerk DOCUMENT
10/08/2018 01:26:39 PM
CourthouseNews-1
29. Defendants Zenghua International Co. Ltd., Trademark Global, LLC, Caravan canopy
International, Inc. and /or John doe Defendants 1-20 breached these duties by
c. Failing to properly test the zero gravity chair in the weather and elements; and
d. Failing to properly warn of the deterioration of the zero gravity chair purchased
by plaintiff.
a. Was susceptible to failure as a result of exposure to the weather, even though the
b. Used substandard materials and was created with substandard procedures, and
workmanship;
c. Did not include fail safe components in the design that would prevent the failure
of the entire chair when the bungee cord failed in one spot.
31. At the time the product was manufactured, shipped, distributed and sold there was a
feasible alternative production practice and design that was available that would have
the zero gravity chair to users without creating equal or greater risk of harm to others.
32. These breaches of the manufacturers duty proximately caused the grievous injuries
COM : 000007 of 000011
suffered by Plaintiff including the paralysis, degradation of his overall health and physical
ability, impairment of his mental ability, crippling effects on his entire body, loss of
Page 7 of 11
Filed 18-CI-03522 10/05/2018 Vincent Riggs, Fayette Circuit Clerk
Filed 18-CI-03522 10/05/2018 NOT ORIGINAL
Vincent Riggs, Fayette Circuit Clerk DOCUMENT
10/08/2018 01:26:39 PM
CourthouseNews-1
enjoyment of life, humiliation, pain, suffering, ability to earn a livelihood, long hospital
stay, being confined to a nursing home, generally being unable to care for himself,
medical costs incurred, painful and frustrating rehabilitation, and general frustration with
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests that this honorable court enter judgment against
Defendants Zenghua International Co. Ltd., Trademark Global, LLC, Caravan canopy
International, Inc. and /or John doe Defendants 1-20 in an amount that will adequately
compensate Plaintiff for his injuries together with the costs of this action, interest and
attorney’s fees.
COUNT II
BREACH OF EXPRESS AND/OR IMPLIED WARRANTY - MANUFACTURER
34. The zero gravity chair was not reasonably fit for use outdoors even though it was
advertised as an outdoor chair and the failure of the chair was, at least in part, due to
35. By advertising the zero gravity chair as an outdoor chair, Defendant manufacturers
created an both an express and implied warranty that the zero gravity chair was fit for
use outdoors.
36. The zero gravity chair was in fact not suitable for use outdoors because the bungee cord
37. This failure of the zero gravity chair was a breach of the implied warranty that the chair
Page 8 of 11
Filed 18-CI-03522 10/05/2018 Vincent Riggs, Fayette Circuit Clerk
Filed 18-CI-03522 10/05/2018 NOT ORIGINAL
Vincent Riggs, Fayette Circuit Clerk DOCUMENT
10/08/2018 01:26:39 PM
CourthouseNews-1
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests that this honorable court enter judgment against
Defendants Zenghua International Co. Ltd., Trademark Global, LLC, Caravan canopy
International, Inc. and /or John doe Defendants 1-20 in an amount that will adequately
compensate Plaintiff for his injuries together with the costs of this action, interest and
attorney’s fees.
COUNT III
NEGIGENCE AGAINST SELLERS – ALL DEENDANTS
40. At some point in the process from manufacturing through delivery of the zero gravity
41. At all relevant times, Defendant sellers owed a duty to Plaintiff and to the public in general
to properly market and sell their products, properly test their products, and to research
reviews of similar products that may have disclosed defects in manufacture or design.
42. Defendants knew or should have known that the zero gravity chair was not reasonably
43. Defendants knew or should have known that the zero gravity chair was not reasonably
44. Defendant sellers did not adequately test the product they were selling to ensure that it
COM : 000009 of 000011
was safe and reasonably fit for the particular purpose it was sold.
Page 9 of 11
Filed 18-CI-03522 10/05/2018 Vincent Riggs, Fayette Circuit Clerk
Filed 18-CI-03522 10/05/2018 NOT ORIGINAL
Vincent Riggs, Fayette Circuit Clerk DOCUMENT
10/08/2018 01:26:39 PM
CourthouseNews-1
45. Defendant sellers knew or should have known that the zero gravity chair was not
reasonably safe to be used outside because of deterioration of the bungee cords due to
46. If the Defendant sellers had conducted proper testing on the zero gravity chair, then they
would have known it was not reasonably safe when it was sold.
47. Defendant sellers did not do adequate testing, and at the time the product was
manufactured, shipped, distributed and sold there was a feasible alternative production
practice and design that was available that would have prevented Plaintiff’s injury without
significantly impairing the usefulness or desirability of the zero gravity chair to users
Defendants in an amount that will adequately compensate Plaintiff for his injuries
together with the costs of this action, interest and attorney’s fees.
COUNT IV
BREACH OF IMPLIED AND EXPRESS WARRANTY - SELLERS
48. Plaintiff incorporates by reference paragraphs 1-47 as though fully restated herein.
49. The zero gravity chair was not reasonably fit for use outdoors even though it was
advertised as an outdoor chair and the failure of the chair was, at least in part, due to
50. By advertising the zero gravity chair as an outdoor chair, Defendant manufacturers
COM : 000010 of 000011
created an both an express and implied warranty that the zero gravity chair was fit for
use outdoors.
Page 10 of 11
Filed 18-CI-03522 10/05/2018 Vincent Riggs, Fayette Circuit Clerk
Filed 18-CI-03522 10/05/2018 NOT ORIGINAL
Vincent Riggs, Fayette Circuit Clerk DOCUMENT
10/08/2018 01:26:39 PM
CourthouseNews-1
51. The zero gravity chair was in fact not suitable for use outdoors because the bungee cord
52. This failure of the zero gravity chair was a breach of the implied warranty that the chair
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests that this honorable court enter judgment against all
Defendants in an amount that will adequately compensate Plaintiff for his injuries together
/s/James O’Toole
Smith, O’Toole & Brooke
2333 Alexandria Dr.
JURY DEMAND
Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury.
/s/James O’Toole
Page 11 of 11
Filed 18-CI-03522 10/05/2018 Vincent Riggs, Fayette Circuit Clerk