M 6-D S D E F S S: 1.0 Scope and Application
M 6-D S D E F S S: 1.0 Scope and Application
M 6-D S D E F S S: 1.0 Scope and Application
While we have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this Internet version of the document, it is not the
official version. To see a complete version including any recent edits, visit:
https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/ECFR?page=browse and search under Title 40, Protection of
Environment.
1.1 Analytes.
Analyte CAS No. Sensitivity
SO2 7449-09-5 3.4 mg SO2/m3
(2.12 × 10)−7 lb/ft3
1.2 Applicability. This method applies to the measurement of sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions
from stationary sources.
1.3 Data Quality Objectives. Adherence to the requirements of this method will enhance the
quality of the data obtained from air pollutant sampling methods.
2.0 Summary of Method
2.1 A gas sample is extracted from the sampling point in the stack. The SO2 and the sulfur
trioxide, including those fractions in any sulfur acid mist, are separated. The SO2 fraction is
measured by the barium-thorin titration method.
3.0 Definitions [Reserved]
4.0 Interferences
4.1 Free Ammonia. Free ammonia interferes with this method by reacting with SO2 to form
particulate sulfite and by reacting with the indicator. If free ammonia is present (this can be
determined by knowledge of the process and/or noticing white particulate matter in the probe and
isopropanol bubbler), alternative methods, subject to the approval of the Administrator are
required. One approved alternative is listed in Reference 13 of section 17.0.
4.2 Water-Soluble Cations and Fluorides. The cations and fluorides are removed by a glass wool
filter and an isopropanol bubbler; therefore, they do not affect the SO2 analysis. When samples
are collected from a gas stream with high concentrations of metallic fumes (i.e., very fine cation
aerosols) a high-efficiency glass fiber filter must be used in place of the glass wool plug (i.e., the
one in the probe) to remove the cation interferent.
1
Method 6 8/3/2017
5.0 Safety
5.1 Disclaimer. This method may involve hazardous materials, operations, and equipment. This
test method may not address all of the safety problems associated with its use. It is the
responsibility of the user to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the
applicability of regulatory limitations before performing this test method.
5.2 Corrosive reagents. The following reagents are hazardous. Personal protective equipment and
safe procedures are useful in preventing chemical splashes. If contact occurs, immediately flush
with copious amounts of water for at least 15 minutes. Remove clothing under shower and
decontaminate. Treat residual chemical burns as thermal burns.
5.2.1 Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2). Irritating to eyes, skin, nose, and lungs. 30% H2O2 is a strong
oxidizing agent. Avoid contact with skin, eyes, and combustible material. Wear gloves when
handling.
5.2.2 Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH). Causes severe damage to eyes and skin. Inhalation causes
irritation to nose, throat, and lungs. Reacts exothermically with limited amounts of water.
5.2.3 Sulfuric Acid (H2SO4). Rapidly destructive to body tissue. Will cause third degree burns.
Eye damage may result in blindness. Inhalation may be fatal from spasm of the larynx, usually
within 30 minutes. May cause lung tissue damage with edema. 1 mg/m3 for 8 hours will cause
lung damage or, in higher concentrations, death. Provide ventilation to limit inhalation. Reacts
violently with metals and organics.
6.0 Equipment and Supplies
6.1 Sample Collection. The following items are required for sample collection:
6.1.1 Sampling Train. A schematic of the sampling train is shown in Figure 6-1. The sampling
equipment described in Method 8 may be substituted in place of the midget impinger equipment
of Method 6. However, the Method 8 train must be modified to include a heated filter between
the probe and isopropanol impinger, and the operation of the sampling train and sample analysis
must be at the flow rates and solution volumes defined in Method 8. Alternatively, SO2 may be
determined simultaneously with particulate matter and moisture determinations by either (1)
replacing the water in a Method 5 impinger system with a 3 percent H2O2 solution, or (2)
replacing the Method 5 water impinger system with a Method 8 isopropanol-filter-H2O2 system.
The analysis for SO2 must be consistent with the procedure of Method 8. The Method 6 sampling
train consists of the following components:
6.1.1.1 Probe. Borosilicate glass or stainless steel (other materials of construction may be used,
subject to the approval of the Administrator), approximately 6 mm (0.25 in.) inside diameter,
with a heating system to prevent water condensation and a filter (either in-stack or heated out-of-
stack) to remove particulate matter, including sulfuric acid mist. A plug of glass wool is a
satisfactory filter.
2
Method 6 8/3/2017
6.1.1.2 Bubbler and Impingers. One midget bubbler with medium-coarse glass frit and
borosilicate or quartz glass wool packed in top (see Figure 6-1) to prevent sulfuric acid mist
carryover, and three 30-ml midget impingers. The midget bubbler and midget impingers must be
connected in series with leak-free glass connectors. Silicone grease may be used, if necessary, to
prevent leakage. A midget impinger may be used in place of the midget bubbler.
NOTE: Other collection absorbers and flow rates may be used, subject to the approval of the
Administrator, but the collection efficiency must be shown to be at least 99 percent for each test
run and must be documented in the report. If the efficiency is found to be acceptable after a
series of three tests, further documentation is not required. To conduct the efficiency test, an
extra absorber must be added and analyzed separately. This extra absorber must not contain more
than 1 percent of the total SO2.
6.1.1.6 Drying Tube. Tube packed with 6- to 16- mesh indicating-type silica gel, or equivalent,
to dry the gas sample and to protect the meter and pump. If silica gel is previously used, dry at
177 °C (350 °F) for 2 hours. New silica gel may be used as received. Alternatively, other types
of desiccants (equivalent or better) may be used, subject to the approval of the Administrator.
6.1.1.8 Pump. Leak-free diaphragm pump, or equivalent, to pull gas through the train. Install a
small surge tank between the pump and rate meter to negate the pulsation effect of the diaphragm
pump on the rate meter.
6.1.1.9 Rate Meter. Rotameter, or equivalent, capable of measuring flow rate to within 2 percent
of the selected flow rate of about 1 liter/min (0.035 cfm).
6.1.1.10 Volume Meter. Dry gas meter (DGM), sufficiently accurate to measure the sample
volume to within 2 percent, calibrated at the selected flow rate and conditions actually
encountered during sampling, and equipped with a temperature sensor (dial thermometer, or
equivalent) capable of measuring temperature accurately to within 3 °C (5.4 °F). A critical
orifice may be used in place of the DGM specified in this section provided that it is selected,
calibrated, and used as specified in section 16.0.
6.1.3 Vacuum Gauge and Rotameter. At least 760-mm Hg (30-in. Hg) gauge and 0- to 40-ml/min
rotameter, to be used for leak-check of the sampling train.
3
Method 6 8/3/2017
6.2 Sample Recovery. The following items are needed for sample recovery:
6.2.2 Storage Bottles. Polyethylene bottles, 100-ml, to store impinger samples (one per sample).
6.3 Sample Analysis. The following equipment is needed for sample analysis:
6.3.1 Pipettes. Volumetric type, 5-ml, 20-ml (one needed per sample), and 25-ml sizes.
6.3.2 Volumetric Flasks. 100-ml size (one per sample) and 1000-ml size.
6.3.4 Erlenmeyer Flasks. 250-ml size (one for each sample, blank, and standard).
7.1 Sample Collection. The following reagents are required for sample collection:
7.1.2.1 Check each lot of isopropanol for peroxide impurities as follows: Shake 10 ml of
isopropanol with 10 ml of freshly prepared 10 percent potassium iodide solution. Prepare a blank
by similarly treating 10 ml of water. After 1 minute, read the absorbance at 352 nm on a
spectrophotometer using a 1-cm path length. If absorbance exceeds 0.1, reject alcohol for use.
4
Method 6 8/3/2017
7.1.4 Potassium Iodide Solution, 10 Percent Weight by Volume (w/v). Dissolve 10.0 g of KI in
water, and dilute to 100 ml. Prepare when needed.
7.2 Sample Recovery. The following reagents are required for sample recovery:
7.3 Sample Analysis. The following reagents and standards are required for sample analysis:
7.3.4 Barium Standard Solution, 0.0100 N. Dissolve 1.95 g of barium perchlorate trihydrate
[Ba(ClO4)2 3H2O] in 200 ml water, and dilute to 1 liter with isopropanol. Alternatively, 1.22 g of
barium chloride dihydrate [BaCl2 2H2O] may be used instead of the barium perchlorate
trihydrate. Standardize as in section 10.5.
7.3.5 Sulfuric Acid Standard, 0.0100 N. Purchase or standardize to ±0.0002 N against 0.0100 N
NaOH which has previously been standardized against potassium acid phthalate (primary
standard grade).
8.0 Sample Collection, Preservation, Storage and Transport
8.1 Preparation of Sampling Train. Measure 15 ml of 80 percent isopropanol into the midget
bubbler and 15 ml of 3 percent H2O2 into each of the first two midget impingers. Leave the final
midget impinger dry. Assemble the train as shown in Figure 6-1. Adjust the probe heater to a
temperature sufficient to prevent water condensation. Place crushed ice and water around the
impingers.
8.2 Sampling Train Leak-Check Procedure. A leak-check prior to the sampling run is
recommended, but not required. A leak-check after the sampling run is mandatory. The leak-
check procedure is as follows:
8.2.1 Temporarily attach a suitable (e.g., 0- to 40- ml/min) rotameter to the outlet of the DGM,
and place a vacuum gauge at or near the probe inlet. Plug the probe inlet, pull a vacuum of at
least 250 mm Hg (10 in. Hg), and note the flow rate as indicated by the rotameter. A leakage rate
in excess of 2 percent of the average sampling rate is not acceptable.
5
Method 6 8/3/2017
NOTE: Carefully (i.e., slowly) release the probe inlet plug before turning off the pump.
8.2.2 It is suggested (not mandatory) that the pump be leak-checked separately, either prior to or
after the sampling run. To leak-check the pump, proceed as follows: Disconnect the drying tube
from the probe-impinger assembly. Place a vacuum gauge at the inlet to either the drying tube or
the pump, pull a vacuum of 250 mm Hg (10 in. Hg), plug or pinch off the outlet of the flow
meter, and then turn off the pump. The vacuum should remain stable for at least 30 seconds.
If performed prior to the sampling run, the pump leak-check shall precede the leak-check of the
sampling train described immediately above; if performed after the sampling run, the pump leak-
check shall follow the sampling train leak-check.
8.2.3 Other leak-check procedures may be used, subject to the approval of the Administrator.
8.3.1 Record the initial DGM reading and barometric pressure. To begin sampling, position the
tip of the probe at the sampling point, connect the probe to the bubbler, and start the pump.
Adjust the sample flow to a constant rate of approximately 1.0 liter/min as indicated by the rate
meter. Maintain this constant rate (±10 percent) during the entire sampling run.
8.3.2 Take readings (DGM volume, temperatures at DGM and at impinger outlet, and rate meter
flow rate) at least every 5 minutes. Add more ice during the run to keep the temperature of the
gases leaving the last impinger at 20 °C (68 °F) or less.
8.3.3 At the conclusion of each run, turn off the pump, remove the probe from the stack, and
record the final readings. Conduct a leak-check as described in section 8.2. (This leak-check is
mandatory.) If a leak is detected, void the test run or use procedures acceptable to the
Administrator to adjust the sample volume for the leakage.
8.3.4 Drain the ice bath, and purge the remaining part of the train by drawing clean ambient air
through the system for 15 minutes at the sampling rate. Clean ambient air can be provided by
passing air through a charcoal filter or through an extra midget impinger containing 15 ml of 3
percent H2O2. Alternatively, ambient air without purification may be used.
8.4 Sample Recovery. Disconnect the impingers after purging. Discard the contents of the midget
bubbler. Pour the contents of the midget impingers into a leak-free polyethylene bottle for
shipment. Rinse the three midget impingers and the connecting tubes with water, and add the
rinse to the same storage container. Mark the fluid level. Seal and identify the sample container.
9.0 Quality Control
Section Quality control measure Effect
7.1.2 Isopropanol check Ensure acceptable level of peroxide impurities in
isopropanol.
6
Method 6 8/3/2017
8.2, 10.1- Sampling equipment leak-check Ensure accurate measurement of stack gas flow
10.4 and calibration rate, sample volume.
10.5 Barium standard solution Ensure precision of normality determination
standardization
11.2.3 Replicate titrations Ensure precision of titration determinations.
10.1.1.1 Before its initial use in the field, leak-check the metering system (drying tube, needle
valve, pump, rate meter, and DGM) as follows: Place a vacuum gauge at the inlet to the drying
tube and pull a vacuum of 250 mm Hg (10 in. Hg). Plug or pinch off the outlet of the flow meter,
and then turn off the pump. The vacuum must remain stable for at least 30 seconds. Carefully
release the vacuum gauge before releasing the flow meter end.
10.1.1.2 Remove the drying tube, and calibrate the metering system (at the sampling flow rate
specified by the method) as follows: Connect an appropriately sized wet-test meter (e.g., 1 liter
per revolution) to the inlet of the needle valve. Make three independent calibration runs, using at
least five revolutions of the DGM per run. Calculate the calibration factor Y (wet-test meter
calibration volume divided by the DGM volume, both volumes adjusted to the same reference
temperature and pressure) for each run, and average the results (Yi). If any Y-value deviates by
more than 2 percent from (Yi), the metering system is unacceptable for use. If the metering
system is acceptable, use (Yi) as the calibration factor for subsequent test runs.
10.1.2 Post-Test Calibration Check. After each field test series, conduct a calibration check using
the procedures outlined in section 10.1.1.2, except that three or more revolutions of the DGM
may be used, and only two independent runs need be made. If the average of the two post-test
calibration factors does not deviate by more than 5 percent from Yi, then Yiis accepted as the
DGM calibration factor (Y), which is used in Equation 6-1 to calculate collected sample volume
(see section 12.2). If the deviation is more than 5 percent, recalibrate the metering system as in
section 10.1.1, and determine a post-test calibration factor (Yf). Compare Yi and Yf; the smaller
of the two factors is accepted as the DGM calibration factor. If recalibration indicates that the
metering system is unacceptable for use, either void the test run or use methods, subject to the
approval of the Administrator, to determine an acceptable value for the collected sample volume.
10.1.3 DGM as a Calibration Standard. A DGM may be used as a calibration standard for
volume measurements in place of the wet-test meter specified in section 10.1.1.2, provided that it
is calibrated initially and recalibrated periodically according to the same procedures outlined in
Method 5, section 10.3 with the following exceptions: (a) the DGM is calibrated against a wet-
test meter having a capacity of 1 liter/rev (0.035 ft3/rev) or 3 liters/rev (0.1 ft3/rev) and having
the capability of measuring volume to within 1 percent; (b) the DGM is calibrated at 1 liter/min
7
Method 6 8/3/2017
(0.035 cfm); and (c) the meter box of the Method 6 sampling train is calibrated at the same flow
rate.
10.3 Rate Meter. The rate meter need not be calibrated, but should be cleaned and maintained
according to the manufacturer's instructions.
10.5 Barium Standard Solution. Standardize the barium perchlorate or chloride solution against
25 ml of standard sulfuric acid to which 100 ml of 100 percent isopropanol has been added. Run
duplicate analyses. Calculate the normality using the average of duplicate analyses where the
titrations agree within 1 percent or 0.2 ml, whichever is larger.
11.0 Analytical Procedure
11.1 Sample Loss Check. Note level of liquid in container and confirm whether any sample was
lost during shipment; note this finding on the analytical data sheet. If a noticeable amount of
leakage has occurred, either void the sample or use methods, subject to the approval of the
Administrator, to correct the final results.
11.2.1 Transfer the contents of the storage container to a 100-ml volumetric flask, dilute to
exactly 100 ml with water, and mix the diluted sample.
11.2.2 Pipette a 20-ml aliquot of the diluted sample into a 250-ml Erlenmeyer flask and add 80
ml of 100 percent isopropanol plus two to four drops of thorin indicator. While stirring the
solution, titrate to a pink endpoint using 0.0100 N barium standard solution.
11.2.3 Repeat the procedures in section 11.2.2, and average the titration volumes. Run a blank
with each series of samples. Replicate titrations must agree within 1 percent or 0.2 ml, whichever
is larger.
NOTE: Protect the 0.0100 N barium standard solution from evaporation at all times.
12.0 Data Analysis and Calculations
Carry out calculations, retaining at least one extra significant figure beyond that of the acquired
data. Round off figures after final calculation.
12.1 NOMENCLATURE
CSO2 = Concentration of SO2, dry basis, corrected to standard conditions, mg/dscm (lb/dscf).
8
Method 6 8/3/2017
Where:
K1 = 0.3855 °K/mm Hg for metric units,
K1 = 17.65 °R/in. Hg for English units.
Where:
K2=32.03 mg SO2/meq for metric units,
K2=7.061 × 10−5 lb SO2/meq for English units.
13.0 Method Performance
9
Method 6 8/3/2017
13.1 Range. The minimum detectable limit of the method has been determined to be 3.4 mg
SO2/m3 (2.12 × 10−7 lb/ft3). Although no upper limit has been established, tests have shown that
concentrations as high as 80,000 mg/m3 (0.005 lb/ft3) of SO2 can be collected efficiently at a rate
of 1.0 liter/min (0.035 cfm) for 20 minutes in two midget impingers, each containing 15 ml of 3
percent H2O2. Based on theoretical calculations, the upper concentration limit in a 20 liter (0.7
ft3) sample is about 93,300 mg/m3 (0.00583 lb/ft3).
14.0 Pollution Prevention [Reserved]
15.0 Waste Management [Reserved]
16.0 Alternative Procedures
Vsb(std) = Volume of gas as measured by the soap bubble meter, corrected to standard conditions,
scm (scf).
θ = Soap bubble travel time, min.
θs = Time, min.
16.2 Critical Orifices for Volume and Rate Measurements. A critical orifice may be used in place
of the DGM specified in section 6.1.1.10, provided that it is selected, calibrated, and used as
follows:
16.2.1 Preparation of Sampling Train. Assemble the sampling train as shown in Figure 6-2. The
rate meter and surge tank are optional but are recommended in order to detect changes in the
flow rate.
10
Method 6 8/3/2017
NOTE: The critical orifices can be adapted to a Method 6 type sampling train as follows: Insert
sleeve type, serum bottle stoppers into two reducing unions. Insert the needle into the stoppers as
shown in Figure 6-3.
16.2.2.1 The procedure that follows describes the use of hypodermic needles and stainless steel
needle tubings, which have been found suitable for use as critical orifices. Other materials and
critical orifice designs may be used provided the orifices act as true critical orifices, (i.e., a
critical vacuum can be obtained) as described in this section. Select a critical orifice that is sized
to operate at the desired flow rate. The needle sizes and tubing lengths shown in Table 6-1 give
the following approximate flow rates.
16.2.2.2 Determine the suitability and the appropriate operating vacuum of the critical orifice as
follows: If applicable, temporarily attach a rate meter and surge tank to the outlet of the sampling
train, if said equipment is not present (see section 16.2.1). Turn on the pump and adjust the valve
to give an outlet vacuum reading corresponding to about half of the atmospheric pressure.
Observe the rate meter reading. Slowly increase the vacuum until a stable reading is obtained on
the rate meter. Record the critical vacuum, which is the outlet vacuum when the rate meter first
reaches a stable value. Orifices that do not reach a critical value must not be used.
16.2.3.1 Leak-Check Procedure. A leak-check before the sampling run is recommended, but not
required. The leak-check procedure is as follows: Temporarily attach a suitable (e.g., 0-40
ml/min) rotameter and surge tank, or a soap bubble meter and surge tank to the outlet of the
pump. Plug the probe inlet, pull an outlet vacuum of at least 250 mm Hg (10 in. Hg), and note
the flow rate as indicated by the rotameter or bubble meter. A leakage rate in excess of 2 percent
of the average sampling rate (Qstd) is not acceptable. Carefully release the probe inlet plug before
turning off the pump.
16.2.3.2 Moisture Determination. At the sampling location, prior to testing, determine the
percent moisture of the ambient air using the wet and dry bulb temperatures or, if appropriate, a
relative humidity meter.
16.2.3.3 Critical Orifice Calibration. At the sampling location, prior to testing, calibrate the
entire sampling train (i.e., determine the flow rate of the sampling train when operated at critical
conditions). Attach a 500-ml soap bubble meter to the inlet of the probe, and operate the
sampling train at an outlet vacuum of 25 to 50 mm Hg (1 to 2 in. Hg) above the critical vacuum.
Record the information listed in Figure 6-4. Calculate the standard volume of air measured by
the soap bubble meter and the volumetric flow rate using the equations below:
11
Method 6 8/3/2017
16.2.3.4 Sampling.
16.2.3.4.1 Operate the sampling train for sample collection at the same vacuum used during the
calibration run. Start the watch and pump simultaneously. Take readings (temperature, rate
meter, inlet vacuum, and outlet vacuum) at least every 5 minutes. At the end of the sampling run,
stop the watch and pump simultaneously.
16.2.3.4.2 Conduct a post-test calibration run using the calibration procedure outlined in section
16.2.3.3. If the Qstd obtained before and after the test differ by more than 5 percent, void the test
run; if not, calculate the volume of the gas measured with the critical orifice using Equation 6-6
as follows:
16.2.3.4.3 If the percent difference between the molecular weight of the ambient air at
saturated conditions and the sample gas is more that ±3 percent, then the molecular weight of the
gas sample must be considered in the calculations using the following equation:
NOTE: A post-test leak-check is not necessary because the post-test calibration run results will
indicate whether there is any leakage.
16.2.3.4.4 Drain the ice bath, and purge the sampling train using the procedure described in
section 8.3.4.
16.3 Elimination of Ammonia Interference. The following alternative procedures must be used in
addition to those specified in the method when sampling at sources having ammonia emissions.
16.3.1 Sampling. The probe shall be maintained at 275 °C (527 °F) and equipped with a high-
efficiency in-stack filter (glass fiber) to remove particulate matter. The filter material shall be
unreactive to SO2. Whatman 934AH (formerly Reeve Angel 934AH) filters treated as described
in Reference 10 in section 17.0 of Method 5 is an example of a filter that has been shown to
work. Where alkaline particulate matter and condensed moisture are present in the gas stream,
the filter shall be heated above the moisture dew point but below 225 °C (437 °F).
16.3.2 Sample Recovery. Recover the sample according to section 8.4 except for discarding the
contents of the midget bubbler. Add the bubbler contents, including the rinsings of the bubbler
12
Method 6 8/3/2017
with water, to a separate polyethylene bottle from the rest of the sample. Under normal testing
conditions where sulfur trioxide will not be present significantly, the tester may opt to delete the
midget bubbler from the sampling train. If an approximation of the sulfur trioxide concentration
is desired, transfer the contents of the midget bubbler to a separate polyethylene bottle.
16.3.3 Sample Analysis. Follow the procedures in sections 11.1 and 11.2, except add 0.5 ml of
0.1 N HCl to the Erlenmeyer flask and mix before adding the indicator. The following analysis
procedure may be used for an approximation of the sulfur trioxide concentration. The accuracy
of the calculated concentration will depend upon the ammonia to SO2 ratio and the level of
oxygen present in the gas stream. A fraction of the SO2 will be counted as sulfur trioxide as the
ammonia to SO2 ratio and the sample oxygen content increases. Generally, when this ratio is 1 or
less and the oxygen content is in the range of 5 percent, less than 10 percent of the SO2 will be
counted as sulfur trioxide. Analyze the peroxide and isopropanol sample portions separately.
Analyze the peroxide portion as described above. Sulfur trioxide is determined by difference
using sequential titration of the isopropanol portion of the sample. Transfer the contents of the
isopropanol storage container to a 100-ml volumetric flask, and dilute to exactly 100 ml with
water. Pipette a 20-ml aliquot of this solution into a 250-ml Erlenmeyer flask, add 0.5 ml of 0.1
N HCl, 80 ml of 100 percent isopropanol, and two to four drops of thorin indicator. Titrate to a
pink endpoint using 0.0100 N barium perchlorate. Repeat and average the titration volumes that
agree within 1 percent or 0.2 ml, whichever is larger. Use this volume in Equation 6-2 to
determine the sulfur trioxide concentration. From the flask containing the remainder of the
isopropanol sample, determine the fraction of SO2 collected in the bubbler by pipetting 20-ml
aliquots into 250-ml Erlenmeyer flasks. Add 5 ml of 3 percent H2O2, 100 ml of 100 percent
isopropanol, and two to four drips of thorin indicator, and titrate as before. From this titration
volume, subtract the titrant volume determined for sulfur trioxide, and add the titrant volume
determined for the peroxide portion. This final volume constitutes Vt, the volume of barium
perchlorate used for the SO2 sample.
17.0 References
1. Atmospheric Emissions from Sulfuric Acid Manufacturing Processes. U.S. DHEW, PHS,
Division of Air Pollution. Public Health Service Publication No. 999-AP-13. Cincinnati, OH.
1965.
2. Corbett, P.F. The Determination of SO2 and SO3 in Flue Gases. Journal of the Institute of
Fuel. 24:237-243. 1961.
3. Matty, R.E., and E.K. Diehl. Measuring Flue-Gas SO2 and SO3. Power. 101:94-97. November
1957.
4. Patton, W.F., and J.A. Brink, Jr. New Equipment and Techniques for Sampling Chemical
Process Gases. J. Air Pollution Control Association. 13:162. 1963.
5. Rom, J.J. Maintenance, Calibration, and Operation of Isokinetic Source Sampling Equipment.
Office of Air Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Research Triangle Park, NC.
APTD-0576. March 1972.
13
Method 6 8/3/2017
6. Hamil, H.F., and D.E. Camann. Collaborative Study of Method for the Determination of
Sulfur Dioxide Emissions from Stationary Sources (Fossil-Fuel Fired Steam Generators). U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. EPA-650/4-74-024. December
1973.
7. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Part 31; Water, Atmospheric Analysis. American Society
for Testing and Materials. Philadelphia, PA. 1974. pp. 40-42.
8. Knoll, J.E., and M.R. Midgett. The Application of EPA Method 6 to High Sulfur Dioxide
Concentrations. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Research Triangle Park, NC. EPA-
600/4-76-038. July 1976.
9. Westlin, P.R., and R.T. Shigehara. Procedure for Calibrating and Using Dry Gas Volume
Meters as Calibration Standards. Source Evaluation Society Newsletter. 3(1):17-30. February
1978.
10. Yu, K.K. Evaluation of Moisture Effect on Dry Gas Meter Calibration. Source Evaluation
Society Newsletter. 5(1):24-28. February 1980.
11. Lodge, J.P., Jr., et al. The Use of Hypodermic Needles as Critical Orifices in Air Sampling.
J. Air Pollution Control Association. 16:197-200. 1966.
12. Shigehara, R.T., and C.B. Sorrell. Using Critical Orifices as Method 5 CalibrationStandards.
Source Evaluation Society Newsletter. 10:4-15. August 1985.
13. Curtis, F., Analysis of Method 6 Samples in the Presence of Ammonia. Source Evaluation
Society Newsletter. 13(1):9-15 February 1988.
18.0 Tables, Diagrams, Flowcharts and Validation Data
14
Method 6 8/3/2017
15
Method 6 8/3/2017
16
Method 6 8/3/2017
17
Method 6 8/3/2017
18