Effect of Salam (Syzygium Polyanthum (Wigt) Walp.) Leaves Extract On The Microorganism Population in Chicken Meat and Shrimp and Their Sensory
Effect of Salam (Syzygium Polyanthum (Wigt) Walp.) Leaves Extract On The Microorganism Population in Chicken Meat and Shrimp and Their Sensory
Effect of Salam (Syzygium Polyanthum (Wigt) Walp.) Leaves Extract On The Microorganism Population in Chicken Meat and Shrimp and Their Sensory
Department of Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra
1
Received: 30 January 2017 Recently, there has been an increasing demand and interest in developing plant extracts as
Received in revised form: natural food sanitizer, owing to their antimicrobial properties. Hence, the aim of this study
5 March 2017 was to investigate the effect of salam (Syzygium polyanthum L.) leaves methanolics extract
Accepted: 6 March 2017
on the number of microflora on chicken meat and shrimp. Salam leaves extract at different
concentrations (0.0%, 0.1%, 1.00%) and exposure times (5, and 10 min) used to treat chicken
meat and shrimp by using dilution method. Result showed that the total plate count and
Keywords Staphylococcus aureus had been detected in untreated chicken and shrimp samples with 6.66 ±
0.12, 8.66 ± 0.15 and 7.25 ± 0.21, 6.54 ± 0.21, respectively. However, there was no Escherichia
Salam leaves
coli, Salmonella spp. and Vibrio cholerae detected in both samples. The number of total plate
Syzygium polyanthum L
Foodborne pathogens count (TPC) and S. aureus in chicken meat and shrimp were starting to reduce significantly at
Soaking treatment 0.01% concentration of salam leaves extract for 5 minutes of exposure time compared to initial
count. There was no significantly different between exposure times. The highest reduction in
number of microorganism population was at treatment with 1.0% extract for 10 min where
TPC was reduced from 6.66 ± 0.12 to 0.00 ± 0.00 log10 CFU/ml, and from 8.66 ± 0.15 to 4.88 ±
0.00 log10 CFU/ml in shrimp while S. aureus reduced from 7.25 ± 0.21 to 3.88 ± 0.01 and from
6.54 ± 0.21 to 4.92 ± 0.04 in chicken and shrimp, respectively. For the sensory acceptability,
overall acceptability were accepted by panellists until treatment 0.10% for 5 min and 10 min
of soaking time. In conclusion, salam leaves extract might be developed as natural sanitizer for
rinsing raw food materials such as chicken meat and shrimp.
© All Rights Reserved
*Corresponding author.
Email: [email protected]
929 Ramli et al./IFRJ 25(3): 928-935
with slight modification. terms of colour (observed with eyes), odour (smell
with nose), texture (touch with finger) and the overall
Media for enumeration of microorganism by spread acceptability on each treatment samples. The rating
plate method for each analysis of samples were given in a range of
Media were chosen based on Microbiology scale from extremely like (scale of 9) to extremely
Manual (12th ed, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) dislike (scale of 1). Scores ≥5 were “acceptable”.
which included Plate count agar (Merck, Darmstadt,
Germany), Tryptic soy agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Statistical analysis
Germany), Mac Conkey agar (Hardy Diagnostics, Data were analysed by using MINITAB 16 for the
Santa Mania, USA), X.L.D. medium (OXOID Ltd., analysis of variance (ANOVA), one-way, unstacked,
Basingstoke, Hampshire, England) and T.C.B.S. whereby Tukey’s test was employed to determine the
Cholera medium (OXOID Ltd., Basingstoke, significance difference (p<0.05) between different
Hampshire, England). treatments. Results were expressed as means ±
standard deviation (SD) of duplicate analyses, unless
Treatment of chicken and shrimp samples with salam otherwise stated.
leaves extract
Ten grams of raw chicken meat and shrimp Results
samples were immersed in 25 ml of tap water, DIW
and different concentrations (1.0%, 0.1% and 0.01%) Yields of salam leaves extraction
of salam leaves extract solutions at room temperature A 100 g of dried weight of salam leaves extracted
for 5 and 10 min exposure time. A sample without with methanol solvent yielded 3.06 g extract (3.06%).
soaking with any solution served as the positive
control, for both chicken meat and shrimp. Effect of salam leaves extract on number of
microorganisms in treated chicken meat and shrimp
Enumeration of microorganisms by spread plate Chicken meat and shrimp samples were treated
method with different extract concentrations (1.0%, 0.1%,
All treated samples were aseptically removed 0.01%, tap water and DIW) and different soaking
using a flame-sterilized spatula and drained on times (5 min and 10 min). TPC and selective agar
absorbent paper for drying. The treated samples were media were used to enumerate the number of natural
placed into the stomacher bag (Baglight, BagSystem, microflora and food-borne pathogens in chicken meat
Interscience, France) with 90 ml of 0.1% peptone and shrimp samples after treatment. The results were
water. The mixture was homogenized using a interpreted in log10 CFU/ml and summarized in Table
stomacher machine (BagMixer 400-P, Interscience, 1 and Table 2, respectively.
France) for 2 min at 250 rpm. The enumeration of
microorganisms was conducted by spread plate Sensory evaluation of raw chicken meat and shrimp
methods. The colony forming unit per gram (CFU/g) treated with salam leaves extract
of samples were calculated after 24 h of incubation Results for sensory evaluation are presented in
at 37ºC. Table 3 and Table 4, respectively.
Table 1.Number of microorganism presence in untreated chicken meat (initial bacterial load) and
treated chicken meat samples (log10 CFU/ml)
Mean values ± standard deviation with different lowercase letter in the same column have significant
difference (P<0.05).
1
ST = soaking time
2
DIW = deionized water
3
TFTC = too few to count (colonies < 30)
obtained through extraction. Extraction was done The highest reduction of S. aureus population also
by using absolute methanol due to its capability to occurred in treatment 1.0% extract from initial load
produce high yield of extract containing high chemical of log10 CFU/ml 7.25 ± 0.21 to 4.11 ± 0.01, and the
compounds from the plant sample (Caunii et al., reduction in population decreased with the decreasing
2012). Table 1 shows the number of microorganisms concentration of extract solutions. On the contrary,
detected in chicken meat before and after soaking chicken meat samples soaked in tap water and DIW
treatment. The number of microorganisms in total gave only slight reduction in bacterial population
plate count (TPC) detected was log10 CFU/ml 6.66 for both 5 min and 10 min soaking. For TPC, the
± 0.12, S. aureus was log10 CFU/ml 7.25 ± 0.21 reduction only from log10 CFU/ml 6.66 ± 0.12 to 6.61
and none were detected for E. coli and Salmonella ± 0.03 and 6.55 ± 0.0 whereas the population of S.
sp. respectively. In this finding, S. aureus was the aureus reduced from log10 CFU/ml 7.25 ± 0.21 to
highest number of species found in the samples, and 7.13 ± 0.03 and 7.15 ± 0.00 respectively.
this correlated with findings from Akbar and Anal Table 2 shows the number of microorganisms
(2013) who also found S. aureus to be predominant in detected in raw shrimp before and after soaking
poultry meat. The number of total plate count (TPC) treatment. The number of natural microorganisms
and S. aureus in chicken meat were starting to reduce in total plate count (TPC) detected was log10 CFU/
significantly at 0.01% concentration of salam leaves ml 8.66 ± 0.15, whereas for S. aureus was log10
extract for 5 minutes of exposure time compared to CFU/ml 6.54 ± 0.21 and E. coli and V. cholerae not
initial count. However, reduction of the bacterial detected. Results also showed that the total surviving
count was not significantly different between the bacterial population (TPC) on shrimp was reduced
soaking times. after treated with different concentrations of salam
Table 1 also shows the highest reduction of leaves extracts (1.0%, 0.1% and 0.01%), tap water
bacterial population (TPC) occurred in 1.0% and DIW. Basically, the reduction trend in shrimp
concentration from initial bacterial load log10 CFU/ samples after treatment was the same as the trend
ml 6.66 ± 0.12 to ‘Too Few To Count’ (TFTC) and in chicken meat samples. The number of total plate
the population was decreased with the decreasing count (TPC) and S. aureus in shrimp were starting to
concentration of extract solutions. This finding reduce significantly at 0.01% concentration of salam
trend was correlated with Boziaris et al., (2010) leaves extract for 5 min of exposure time compared
who indicated that plant extract delayed the growth to initial count. The highest reduction for both total
of microorganisms in a concentration-dependent bacterial population and S. aureus occurred in 1.0%
manner where the higher the concentration, the higher concentration at 10 min soaking from initial bacterial
the growth in inhibition and reduction. It showed that load of log10 CFU/ml 8.66 ± 0.15 to 4.88 ± 0.00 and
the reduction number of microorganisms in chicken log10 CFU/ml 6.54 ± 0.21 to 4.92 ± 0.04, respectively.
meat was strongly correlated with the concentration On the other hand, there was no bacterial count
of salam leaves extract. from untreated chicken and shrimp samples for
Ramli et al./IFRJ 25(3): 928-935 932
Table 2. Number of microorganism presence in untreated shrimp (initial bacterial load) and
treated shrimp samples (log10 CFU/ml).
Mean values ± standard deviation with different lowercase letter in the same column have significant
difference (P<0.05).
1
ST = soaking time
2
DIW = deionized water
Table 3. Result for sensory evaluation on the application of salam leaves extracts on raw
chicken at different concentrations at different soaking times
Mean values ± standard deviation with different lowercase letter in the same column have significant
difference (P<0.05).
E. coli, Salmonella sp. and V. cholerae, indicating for inhibition of pathogens. Among the compounds
that the samples from hypermarket were fresh and identified which have antibacterial activity include
clean at the time the experiment was performed. hexadecanoic acid and phytol (Preethi et al., 2010).
Enterobacteriaceae is a hygiene indicator of food Besides that, Jananie et al. (2011) also stated that
(Zeitoun et. al., 1994). Enterobacteriaceae family is phytol (0.66%) possess antimicrobial activity.
Gram-negative bacteria that include many of more According to Irawan et al. (2012), salam leaves
familiar pathogens such as Salmonella, E. coli, extract contained carbohydrate, tannins alkaloid,
Klebsiella, Shigella and Proteus. Hence, the initial steroid, triterpenoid, and flavonoid and saponins.
population of Enterobacteriaceae can be an indicator Flavonoids have been reported to possess antibacterial,
of adequate hygiene conditions of food. antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antiallergic,
Finding showed that the effect of salam leaves antimutagenic, and vasodilatory activity. Tannin is
extract was positive which induced a reduction in believed to be responsible for the antibacterial activity
microbial population. Besides that, studies from of salam leaves. The mechanisms of inhibition of the
Setiawan (2002) also proved that salam leaves bacteria growth involved precipitation forming and
extract possesses antimicrobial activities to inhibit denaturing of the bacteria protein (Nur Amalina,
the growth of microorganisms such as E. coli, V. 2014).
cholerae and Salmonella sp. Roughly, mechanism Since salam leaves has been proved to have
of antimicrobial action from plant extract can be antimicrobial functions, as also demonstrated in
explained as the membrane disruption pathway this study, sensory evaluation was also carried out
by phenolics and metal chelation by flavonoids in in order to determine the effect of salam leaves
inhibiting the growth of microorganisms. According extract application in the food system on the sensory
to Lau (2015), salam leaves contain different active properties, even at low concentrations. The variations
compounds where each of them functions differently in colour, odour and texture of the food samples after
933 Ramli et al./IFRJ 25(3): 928-935
Table 4. Result for sensory evaluation on the application of salam leaves extracts
on raw shrimp at different concentrations at different soaking times.
Mean values ± standard deviation with different lowercase letter in the same column have significant
difference (P<0.05).
treatment do account for variations in food quality and microorganism population in chicken meat and
consumer acceptance rather than caused by spoilage shrimp was positive. The reduction of the number
bacteria (Solomon et al., 2014). Sensory evaluation of microorganisms by salam leaves extract was
results were interpreted and presented in Table 3 dependent on extract concentration. The higher the
for chicken meat and Table 4 for shrimp. Sensory concentration of extracts resulted the higher the
evaluation was conducted in visual testing basis microbial reduction. In chicken meat and shrimp,
with 30 random panellists. Four attributes including the numbers of microorganisms were starting to
colour, texture, odour and overall appearance were reduce significantly at 0.01% concentration of
evaluated in a 9-point hedonic scale. daun salam extract for 5 minutes of exposure time
Based on the data in Table 3 and Table 4, overall compared to initial count. There was no significantly
acceptability were accepted by panellists until different between exposure times. For the sensory
treatment 0.10% for 5 min and 0.1% for 10 min of acceptability, overall acceptability was accepted by
soaking time. This meaning the treatment by tap panellists until treatment 0.10% for 5 min and 10 min
water, DIW, 0.01% and 0.1% extract at 5 and 10 of soaking time. Overall, these results suggested that
min were not significantly different and this types salam leaves extract exhibited antimicrobial activity
of solutions does not affected colour, odour, texture and might be further developed as a natural food
and overall acceptability of the samples. In this test, sanitizer.
tap water was act as a control. The highest overall
acceptability of treated chicken meat at 5 min and 10 Acknowledgement
min treatment was by soaking in 0.01% extract.
Based on Table 4, for raw shrimp samples, the The study was supported by Penelitian
highest preference of treated sample by panellists Fundamental - FRGS Fasa 2- 2014 to Yaya Rukayadi
was 0.1% extract at 5 min soaking which scored at with number FRGS/2/2014/SG05/UPM/02/2.
6.23 ± 1.55 and 0.01% at 10 min with 6.10 ± 1.63.
Many studies had reported the antimicrobial activity References
of plant extract as natural food sanitizer without
concern on sensory acceptability which might affect Abadias M., Usall J., Anguera M., Solsona C. and Viñas
consumer preference in future. Study conducted by I. 2008. Microbiological quality of fresh, minimally-
Bingol et al. (2011) showed the use of lemon juice processed fruit and vegetables, and sprouts from
extract caused slight reduction of S. Enteritidis and retail establishments. International Journal of Food
E. coli in raw meatball, and interestingly results gave Microbiology 123:121-129.
no significant differences for the sensory attributes; Akbar, A. and Anal, A. K. 2013. Prevalence and
antibiogram study of Salmonella and Staphylococcus
flavor intensity, acidic flavor, juiciness and overall
aureus in poultry meat. Asian Pacific Journal trop
acceptability. Biomedicine 3(2):163-168.
Annan-Prah, A. D., Amewowor, A. K., Osei-Kofi, J.,
Conclusion Amoono, S. E., Akorli, S. Y., Saka, E. and Ndadi, H.
A. 2011. Street foods: Handling, hygiene and client
The effect of salam leaves extract on the expectations in a World Heritage Site Town, Cape
Coast, Ghana. Africa. Journal Microbiology 5:1629-
Ramli et al./IFRJ 25(3): 928-935 934