Learning and Cognition Essay
Learning and Cognition Essay
Learning and Cognition Essay
Essay Question: How should our teaching practices be influenced by a child’s cultural background?
Introduction
The impact of a child’s diversity on their own, and others’, learning and development has never been
more relevant than in today’s classroom. This has been appreciated by today’s psychologists who
‘recognise that the child’s culture shapes cognitive development by determining what and how the
child will learn about the world’ (Woolfolk and Margetts, 2013, p. 95). Australia in particular is a
country that has seen massive amounts of immigration from all over the world swell its population.
In fact, as a major country it holds the second highest percentage of residents born overseas
(Australian Department of Immigration and Citizenship, 2012).While such national diversity
represents a new age of globalisation, acceptance and equality, it also presents a number of
problems to our education system that teachers must adapt to. We have schools full of children who
not only speak a different language or follow a different religion, but possess a completely different
view of the world from each other, and therefore will require teaching strategies that cater best to
these beliefs. The effect of a child’s cultural setting on their learning and development has been
studied closely by a number of well-known psychologists and played a significant role in their
resultant theories. This paper will analyse three of these theories; namely Vygotsky’s Sociocultural
Theory, Bronfenbrenner’s bio-ecological model of development and the Information Processing
Theory. Furthermore, the impact of culture on a child’s development will be studied and how as
teachers we must adapt our learning strategies to accommodate this impact.
Body
Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory
As humans, our activities can only be understood by observing the cultural environments they were
formed in (Woolfolk & Margetts, 2013, p. 95). An absolutely pivotal facet of the way cultural
environments influence our development and the ensuing activities is our social interaction with
others. Lantolf and Thorne (2014, p.198) state that a child’s interactions in their various
environments is the primary source of higher cognitive thought development. These cognitive
structures are formed firstly as interpsychological and are then internalized to become
intrapsychological. These internalized structures will have been influenced by symbolic cultural tools,
such as language, or physical cultural tools which would have dictated the way information was
conveyed to the child. Conceptual tools are another form of cultural tools that can influence a child’s
development (Woolfolk & Margetts, 2013, p. 96). The concept of cultural tools is linked to the
importance of interactions mentioned previously. Children will require adults, most likely their
parents, to instruct them in the use of cultural tools, and the extent to which they understand and
use the tools is reliant on the proficiency of instruction. This can also influence how their thought
processes develop. The cultural tools concept is also closely related to the ZPD notion that Lev
Vygotsky was famous for creating. ZPD stands for Zone of Proximal Development and it explains how
The notion and use of play in children is another important facet of Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory.
It is another activity that has the capability to greatly increase a child’s ZPD and interpersonal skills.
The presence of structure, regulation, encouragement and advice all lead to faster and more
effective development. Lillemyr et al. (2011) also states that play is crucial in promoting language
development and providing a greater understanding of cultural concepts. Children from different
cultural backgrounds will have drawn specific forms and methods of play from their own
perspectives and tools specific to their culture. This can often lead to greater or lesser development
in certain areas involved with the play, and also a different understanding of play as a whole. Things
such as speaking, listening, physical action and the use of rigid structures will all have varying levels
of importance for different children (Lillemyr et al, 2011). Therefore, it is beneficial that when play
tasks amongst children are assigned, that they are mediated by a teacher or adult so all children are
provided with the same opportunity for learning and development. Arguably the most important
outcome of interactive play is that it leads to a sense of closeness and belonging between the
children involved. Children engaging in play that is specific to their new cultural environment will
most likely develop a sense of identity with that culture. Deci and Ryan (1995) acknowledge that this
sense of relatedness is much more desirable in all cultures than that of autonomy and isolation.
While both isolation and interpersonal relations are both required for greater development, play
extends the ZPD and builds relationships, which is essential for higher order thinking. The
importance of play is not restricted to specific cultures; it applies to all and this means it is a
powerful tool in the hands of a teacher responsible for a diverse classroom.
Bronfenbrenner’s Theory
The different environments a child interacts with will shape that child’s development. This was
explained in the previous section in relation to Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory and the importance
of interactions, but Bronfenbrenner’s Theory goes into much more depth on this aspect.
We will look closer at proximal processes, which are the close and enduring relationships a child
engages in in the microsystem stage. The elements of the proximal processes, time, the attributes of
the developing child in question, and the context of the environments all influence the effect these
environment structures have on a child (Bronfenbrenner, 1994, p.38). Activities that fall under the
umbrella term of proximal processes include parents reading to their children, interactions involving
play or study and even solitary reading. The child’s culture saturates each environmental structure,
from the macrosystem inwards and this has a significant effect on how they engage in their proximal
processes. Therefore, even if certain aspects of the environment were the same e.g. school or
workplace, the cultural influence on these settings will result in children from different cultures
developing differently. The set of values that a culture holds must be factors in at least one of the
microsystems of the child to influence their development. As teachers we must acknowledge that
school is only one facet of a child’s ecological environment, and is often at conflicts with other
environmental structures in the child’s life. Even if children share many aspects of the same culture
now by living in the same country, there are still aspects of that culture that are influencing their
development, such as home life or religious gatherings.
Classroom Applications
These three theories provide teachers with a multitude of crucial information that they can apply in
their classrooms. Vygotsky gives us insight into how a child’s interactions with peers, adults and
cultural tools affect their development. The notion of cultural tools is of particular importance. If a
child has been raised with different tools, or has used similar tools in a different way, then this will
limit their ability in a new environment. When setting learning tasks, teachers must be cautious that
when children are doing these tasks that they are using cultural tools that are familiar to the widest
range of students. Using visuals or moving objects instead of confronting masses of text for a
student struggling with English is an example. For some subjects this will be hard to avoid, but for
others such as maths, which is a universal tool, this will not be an issue. Also technology and its
many resources make this an easier dilemma to solve than ever. Vygotsky also touches on the
importance of play, which as mentioned previously is an extremely helpful tool in the hands of a
teacher. Particularly in a scenario where a child is not fitting in and feeling excluded, play can be
utilised to enable bonding with the other students and boost confidence and self-esteem; a pivotal
trait for successful learning (Lillemyr et al, 2011, p.43). Play also supports a child’s development of
language skills and a general understanding of how their new culture operates.
Bronfenbrenner provides a clear picture of how overwhelming moving to a new culture can be.
Fortunately for teachers, every environment a child encounters is new to them, and as a result they
adapt easier than adults (Bronfenbrenner, 1994, p.39). Sensitivity is still required however. The
classroom set up needs to accommodate the heavy influences different cultural environments have
on the many children on the class; if it is too geared too much towards children of a specific cultural
background then other children’s learning will suffer by no fault of their own. As teachers we will
also have to manage when a child’s other environments come into contact with our own- parents in
particular have varying levels of participation with their child’s education. This often impacted by the
norms of their culture of origin. For the majority of children, seeing their parents in their own school
The concept of discrepant stimuli was discussed thoroughly in the chapter analysing Information
Processing Theory. This aspect of the theory provides a number of applications and cautions for
teachers. Too much new and conspicuous stimuli and a child will become overwhelmed. This can
apply to things such as wall displays, posters or simply new structures and activities. Discrepant
stimuli will be even more overwhelming for a child if it is not relatable to the culture-specific
information they have processed and stored in their long-term memory. Therefore, we should be
constructing learning tasks with the various cultures of our students in mind and implementing plans
that will appeal to the widest spread of cultures possible.
Conclusion
To conclude, our teaching practices should be heavily influenced by a child’s cultural background in
order support their learning development. Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory, Bronfenbrenner’s bio-
ecological model of development and the Information Processing Theory all give explanations as to
how significant an impact a child’s culture has on their learning, and they also provide many
applications as to how teachers can adapt to this. Vygotsky singles out the importance of
interactions in his theory, and with that how play and the use of cultural tools extends their zone of
proximal development. Both of these can be utilised and applied in the classroom to promote higher
order thinking and a sense of relatedness with their peers. Bronfenbrenner highlighted the array of
environmental structures present in a child’s life and the impact these have when they intermingle.
Teachers are at the centre of these environmental interactions and are also one of the child’s
proximal processes, showing how influential we can be in the lives of our students. The theory also
suggests the use of parent participation and sensitivity to ever-adapting children. The Information
Processing Theory goes into detail as to how a child takes in, stores and uses knowledge and
information. The implications of this can be kept in mind when planning lessons, remembering that
students will respond to tasks they can relate to their own culture and be overwhelmed when
presented with too many discrepant stimuli. Groundwater Smith et al. (2015, p. 61) sums it up when
it describes schools as sites where ‘explicit, positive messages can and should be relayed about the
great benefits of an ethnically diverse society’.
Woolfolk, A & Margetts, K 2013, Educational psychology , 3rd edn, Pearson Australia, Frenchs Forest,
NSW.
Groundwater-Smith, S, Ewing R & Le Cornu, R 2015, Teaching challenges & dilemmas, 5th edn,
Cengage Learning, VIC.
Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College
Press.
Lantolf, JP & Thorne, SL 2014, ‘Sociocultural theory and second language learning’ in Theories in
second language acquisition, 2nd edn, ed B VanPatten & J Williams, Routledge, Chicago, pp. 197-217.
Lillemyr, OF, Sobstad, F, Marder, K, & Flowerday, T 2011, 'A Multicultural Perspective on Play and
Learning in Primary School', International Journal of Early Childhood, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 43-65.
Deci, E.L. & Ryan, R.M. 2008, "Self-Determination Theory: A Macrotheory of Human Motivation,
Development, and Health",Canadian Psychology, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 182-185.
Bronfenbrenner, U 1994, ‘Ecological models of human development’ in Gauvain, M & Cole, M (eds.),
International Encyclopedia of Education, vol. 3, 2nd edn, Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 37-43.
Cormier, R 1991, The Role of Cognitive Schemata and Discrepant Stimuli in the Foreign Language
Classroom.