Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 84 views

    People Vs Paraiso

    Uploaded by

    master
    Rolando Paraiso and John Doe broke into Lolita Tigle's home, herded her children into a room, and stole cash and valuables worth over P179,000. Before leaving, John Doe stabbed and killed Lolita Tigle. The court found Rolando Paraiso guilty of robbery with homicide beyond reasonable doubt as an accomplice to John Doe. Paraiso was sentenced to death by lethal injection due to the aggravating circumstances of the crime being committed in the victim's home without provocation and the accused taking advantage of their superior strength.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    People Vs Paraiso

    Uploaded by

    master
    84 views1 page
    Rolando Paraiso and John Doe broke into Lolita Tigle's home, herded her children into a room, and stole cash and valuables worth over P179,000. Before leaving, John Doe stabbed and killed Lolita Tigle. The court found Rolando Paraiso guilty of robbery with homicide beyond reasonable doubt as an accomplice to John Doe. Paraiso was sentenced to death by lethal injection due to the aggravating circumstances of the crime being committed in the victim's home without provocation and the accused taking advantage of their superior strength.

    Original Description:

    Case digest

    Original Title

    People vs Paraiso

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Rolando Paraiso and John Doe broke into Lolita Tigle's home, herded her children into a room, and stole cash and valuables worth over P179,000. Before leaving, John Doe stabbed and killed Lolita Tigle. The court found Rolando Paraiso guilty of robbery with homicide beyond reasonable doubt as an accomplice to John Doe. Paraiso was sentenced to death by lethal injection due to the aggravating circumstances of the crime being committed in the victim's home without provocation and the accused taking advantage of their superior strength.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    84 views1 page

    People Vs Paraiso

    Uploaded by

    master
    Rolando Paraiso and John Doe broke into Lolita Tigle's home, herded her children into a room, and stole cash and valuables worth over P179,000. Before leaving, John Doe stabbed and killed Lolita Tigle. The court found Rolando Paraiso guilty of robbery with homicide beyond reasonable doubt as an accomplice to John Doe. Paraiso was sentenced to death by lethal injection due to the aggravating circumstances of the crime being committed in the victim's home without provocation and the accused taking advantage of their superior strength.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    TOPIC: DEATH PENALTY/ CAPITAL PUNISHMENT

    PEOPLE VS PARAISO

    CRIME COMMITTED: SPECIAL COMPLEX CRIME OF ROBBERY WITH HOMICIDE

    FACTS:

    Rolando Paraiso, armed with a gun, and John Doe, armed with a knife, forced their way
    into the house of Lolita Tigle, the victim. The victim’s 4 children were herded into 1 room while the
    accused ransacked the house for cash (P200) and other valuables worth P179,000. Before leaving,
    the accused stabbed the victim who died. Accused raised the defense of alibi.

    HELD:
    The Court hereby finds the accused Roland Paraiso guilty beyond reasonable doubt as a
    co-principal by direct participation of that certain John Doe of the special complex crime of
    robbery with homicide. The felony at bar was attended by two aggravating circumstances, to
    wit, that the act was committed in the dwelling of the offended party without the offended party
    having given any provocation therefore, and that advantage was taken by the accused and of
    his companion of their superior strength -- without any mitigating or extenuating circumstance to
    neutralize or offset any of these aggravating circumstances. He is accordingly sentenced to the
    supreme penalty of death by lethal injection as mandated by law.

    Article 294 of the Revised Penal Code, as amended by R.A. 7659, provides that:

    ART. 294. Robbery with violence against or intimidation of persons. Penalties. Any person guilty of
    robbery with the use of violence against or intimidation of any person shall suffer:

    1. The penalty of reclusion perpetua to death, when by reason or on occasion of the


    robbery, the crime of homicide shall have been committed, or when the robbery shall
    have been accompanied by rape or intentional mutilation or arson.

    You might also like