'Dissertation - Synopsis

`DISSERTATION –SYNOPSIS
DR. AJITH GV
POSTGRADUATE STUDENT
DEPARTMENT OF ORTHODONTICS &DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS
BATCH 2017-18
VOKKALIGARA SANGHA DENTAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL

BANGALORE
RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, BANGALORE

KARNATAKA
RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES,
BANGALORE.KARNATAKA.
ANNEXURE-I
PROFORMA FOR THE REGISTRATION OF SUBJECTS FOR DISSERTATION.
1 NAME OF THE CANDIDATE DR.AJITH .GV,

AND ADDRESS VOKKALIGARA SANGHA DENTAL
( IN BLOCK LETTERS) COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL,
KARNATAKA
2 NAME OF THE INSTITUTION VOKKALIGARA SANGHA DENTAL

COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL,
BANGALORE.
KARNATAKA.
3 COURSE OF STUDY AND MASTER OF DENTAL SURGERY

SUBJECT (M.D.S) IN ORTHODONTICS AND
DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS.
4 DATE OF ADMISSION TO
COURSE
5 TITLE OF THE TOPIC .SKELETAL AND DENTAL CHANGES
WITH NONEXTRACTION BEGG
MECHANOTHERAPHY IN PATIENTS
WITH CLASS II DIVISION I
MALOCCLUSION
6 BRIEF RESUME OF THE INTENDED WORK:
6.1 NEED FOR THE STUDY:

Experimental studies conducted to determine the effects of intermaxillary traction
(with class II elastics) show evidence of remodeling changes in the glenoid fossa and
the head of the condyle,but are of inadequate magnitude to correct the skeletal
discrepancy. class II elastics acts both as an orthodontic device and as a unctional
appliance capable of stimulating growthrate and increasing the amount of condylar
cartilage, thus lengthening the mandible.however most studies reports that the effects
of class IIelastics are primarily dentoalveolar.
The begg technique originated by P.RAYMOND BEGG was proposed
primzarily for extraction treatment..However some studies by Barrer and Cadman
proposed that nonextraction treatment with begg theraphy would be effective in cases
that present a combination of minimum treatment requirements ,maximum intra arch
space, good growth potential . so this clinical and cephalometric study was undertaken
to assess the mode and magnitude of correction of CLASS II correction with Begg
mechanotheraphy nonextration growing children.
6.2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE:

.7
AIM:
To study the skeletal and dental changes with nonextraction begg mechanotheraphy
treatment in patients with class II division I Malocclusion patients
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY:

1. To assess the mode and magnitude of class II correction with begg
mechanotheraphy nonextraction treatment in growing children
2. to know the
6.3
7 MATERIALS & METHODS :
7.1 SOURCE OF THE DATA:

The dental casts for this study will be collected from patients who have undergone
orthodontic treatment at the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial
Orthopaedics, VokkaligaraSangha Dental College & Hospital, Bangalore.
7.2 MATERIAL :
i) Digital Vernier calliper
ii) Dental cast
7.3 PLACE OF STUDY :
VokkaligaraSangha Dental College & Hospital, Bangalore.
7.4 STUDY DESIGN :

Comparative study.
7.5 STUDY DURATION :

18 months
7.6 SAMPLE DESIGN :

Purposive sampling
7.7 SAMPLE SIZE :

40
7.8 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS :

ANOVA with post-hoc test subject to verification of normality assessment
Tucky test
7.9 INCLUSION CRITERIA :

Average growth pattern
Patients with Class I and class II malocclusion who underwent treatment with
MBT 0.022” slot
Permanent dentition
Age limit : 13-35 year
EXCLUSION CRITERIA :
Patients with periodontal problems
Patients with craniofacial anomalies
Patients with systemic diseases
Patients with asymmetries
METHODOLOGY:
The dental casts of 40 patients were selected, which included :
Group I – class I 10 Patients who underwent extraction
10 patients who didn’t undergo extraction
Group II – class II 10 patients who underwent extraction
10 patients who didn’t undergo extraction
Digitalverniercaliperwill be used to measure the widths of the anterior and posterior
parts of maxillary and mandibular dental arches in canine and molar regions from the
most labial aspect of the buccal surface of those teeth.
The caliper is placed at the best estimate of a right angle to the palatal suture in the
maxillary arch and to a line bisecting the incisor segment in the mandibular arch. Each
distance is measured three times and the average of the three values is used as the
final measure.
Does the study require any investigation or intervention to be conducted on

patients or other human or animal? If so, please describe briefly.
No
Has ethical clearance been obtained in case of above?

Yes
8 LIST OF REFERENCES:
1. Luis Alberto Bravo, Jose Antonio Canut, Alejandro Pascual, Begona Bravo.
Comparison of the changes in facial profile after orthodontic treatment, with
and without extractions. British Journal of Orthodontics: February 1997;
24;25-34.
2. Gayle Glenn, Peter M Sinclair, Richard G. Alexander. Nonextraction
orthodontic therapy: post treatment dental and skeletal stability. Am J
OrthodOrthop: October 1987; 92(4):321-8.
3. FabianeLouly, Paulo Roberto AranhaNouer, ArnaldoPinzan. Dental arch
dimensions in the mixed dentition: a study of Brazilian children from 9 to 12
years of age. Journal of Applied Oral Science: April 2011; 19(2):160-74
4. Anthony A Gianelly. Arch width after extraction and non-extraction
treatment. Am J OrthodDentofacial Orthop:2003;123:25-8.
5. Claudio Herzog, DimitriosKonstantonis, NikoletaKonstantoni, and Theodore
Eliades. Arch width changes in extraction vs non extraction treatments in
matched class 1 borderline malocclusions. Am J OrthodDentofacialOrthop
2017: 151; 735-43.
6. Robert N Staley, Wendell R Stuntz and Lawrence C Peterson. A comparison
of arch widths in adults with normal occlusion and adults with class 2,
division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod: august 1985; 88(2):163-9.
7. David E. Paquette, John R. Beattie, Lysle E. Johnston. A long – term

comparison of non-extraction edgewise therapy in “borderline” class II
patients. American Journal Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop: July 1992; 102(1):1-14.
9 SIGNATURE OF THE CANDIDATE DR. ANUSHA G HEGDE
10 REMARKS OF THE GUIDE
11 NAME & DESIGNATION OF DR SHAILAJA.MDS

(IN BLOCK LETTERS) PROFESSOR
11.1 GUIDE DEPARTMENT OF
ORTHODONTICS & DENTOFACIAL
ORTHOPAEDICS
VOKKALIGARA SANGHA DENTAL
COLLE AND
HOSPITAL,BANGALORE
11.2 SIGNATURE
11.3 CO-GUIDE (IF ANY)
11.4 SIGNATURE
11.5 HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT DR .SANTOSH RAMEGOWDAM.D.S
PROFESSOR & HEAD OF THE
DEPARTMENT OF
ORTHODONTICS & DENTOFACIAL
ORTHOPAEDICS,
COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL,
BANGALORE
11.6 SIGNATURE
REMARKS OF THE CHAIRMAN DR. USHA.H.LM.D.S.

12
& THE PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL,
COLLEGE AND
HOSPITAL,BANGALORE
12.1 SIGNATURE

'Dissertation - Synopsis

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

'Dissertation - Synopsis

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

'Dissertation - Synopsis

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

`DISSERTATION –SYNOPSIS

VOKKALIGARA SANGHA DENTAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL

RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, BANGALORE

PROFORMA FOR THE REGISTRATION OF SUBJECTS FOR DISSERTATION.

1 NAME OF THE CANDIDATE DR.AJITH .GV,

2 NAME OF THE INSTITUTION VOKKALIGARA SANGHA DENTAL

3 COURSE OF STUDY AND MASTER OF DENTAL SURGERY

6.1 NEED FOR THE STUDY:

6.2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE:

OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY:

7.1 SOURCE OF THE DATA:

7.4 STUDY DESIGN :

7.5 STUDY DURATION :

7.6 SAMPLE DESIGN :

7.7 SAMPLE SIZE :

7.8 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS :

7.9 INCLUSION CRITERIA :

Does the study require any investigation or intervention to be conducted on

Has ethical clearance been obtained in case of above?

7. David E. Paquette, John R. Beattie, Lysle E. Johnston. A long – term

10 REMARKS OF THE GUIDE

11 NAME & DESIGNATION OF DR SHAILAJA.MDS

11.3 CO-GUIDE (IF ANY)

REMARKS OF THE CHAIRMAN DR. USHA.H.LM.D.S.

You might also like