2 Aminobenzothiazole PDF
2 Aminobenzothiazole PDF
2 Aminobenzothiazole PDF
Original article
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: A new series of 6-substituted 2-aminobenzothiazole derivatives were synthesized and screened in vitro
Received 23 October 2012 as potential antimicrobials. Almost all the compounds showed antifungal activity. In particular, com-
Received in revised form pounds 1n,o, designed on the basis of molecular modeling studies, were the best of the series, showing
27 March 2013
MIC values of 4e8 mg/mL against Candida albicans, Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis. None of
Accepted 28 March 2013
Available online 9 April 2013
the two compounds did show any cytotoxicity effect on human THP-1 cells.
Ó 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Antifungal activity
2-Aminobenzothiazole derivatives
CA-CYP51
Docking
Cytotoxicity
0223-5234/$ e see front matter Ó 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2013.03.064
358 A. Catalano et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 64 (2013) 357e364
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: (i) 4-nitrophenol (for compounds 3eeh,n) or phenol (for compound 6i), PPh3, DIAD, anhyd THF, rt; (ii) HCOONH4, 10% Pd/C, i-Pr2O/H2O/THF, rt
(for compounds 6feh); H2, 10% Pd/C, MeOH/abs EtOH, rt (for compounds 5 and 6e), H2, 10% Pd/C, abs EtOH, rt (for compounds 6n,o); (iii) Br2, NH4SCN, HCOOH/CH3COOH, 0 C then
rt.
compounds under study. All of them are actually capable to bulkiness and/or lipophilicity, was already highlighted in the 2D-
accommodate the active site mainly anchoring the heterocyclic QSAR study previously mentioned. As long as this evidence was
system nearly perpendicular to the heme group of CA-CYP51, by concerned, the synthesis of novel compounds was perceived and
mean of a coordination bond involving the iron and the nitrogen carried out according to the insights achieved by the modeling
atoms, as it might be perceived from the docking of the most study. Indeed 2D-QSAR highlighted the affect of lipophilicity on
potent antifungal agent 1e depicted in Fig. 3. As a figure of merit, antifungal activity, suggesting thereafter that an increase of this
the same binding topology has also been experimentally observed chemical cliché would have been at least mandatory to challenge
in the X-ray structures of other thiazoles in complex with cyto- the pMIC data. Moreover, the nature of the CA-CYP51 binding cleft
chrome different from the CA-CYP51, but functionally related to was proved from dockings to be most likely characterized by ar-
our target [28]. At the same time, the amino group at position 2 omatic, or at least very low polar, residues. This guided us in the
reinforces the binding engaging Thr311 and Gly307 with design of 1n,o as antifungals with improved activity. As expected
hydrogen-bonding mediated polar interactions. This evidence these analogs were found to be the most potent of the series. The
then facilitates the positioning of the apolar and steric hindered better antimicrobial profile might be ascribed not merely to a
substituents into a most likely hydrophobic dome placed above balancing in lipophilicity, but also to the additional and favorable
the heme group. It is very interesting to note that the benzyl van der Waals interactions occurring between the chlorine atom
moiety of the most potent antifungal agent 1e make extensive pe and the side chain of Val509 (see Fig. 3).
p stackings with Phe228 and Tyr118. Other remarkable indications
have to be ascribed to the reduced accessible surface of the active 2.4. Cytotoxicity assay
site lodge, shaped and delimited by bulky residues, namely
Met508 and Val509. This evidence might justify, at least in part, The most active compounds of the series (1n,o) were tested for
the very low pMIC of derivatives bearing very large and long their cytotoxicity by the measurement of the release of the cytosolic
lipophilic groups hampering a proper docking (i.e. 1h). On the enzyme lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and by the uptake of trypan
other hand, compounds with a very small group, and lacking the blue in damaged cells. The results obtained on human THP-1 cells
phenyl ring (i.e. 1b,c), might not be capable to establish significant indicate that these compounds show no cytotoxicity. Fig. 4 shows that
interactions, resulting then with a lower antifungal potency. It may 1n caused a significant increase for both markers for concentrations
be noted that the need of a suitable functional group, in terms of 20 mg/mL (4 MIC) and that 1o did not cause any LDH release and
induced a small but significant increase in the number of trypan blue-
Table 2 stained cells when its concentration was 40 mg/mL (10 MIC).
Antibacterial activity results of 2-aminobenzothiazole derivatives 1aeo (MIC, mg/
mL).
Table 3
Microorganism (MIC, mg/mL) Antifungal activity results of 2-aminobenzothiazole derivatives 1aeo (MIC, mg/mL).
S.a. 29213 E.f. 29212 E.c. 25922 C.a. 10231 C.p. 22019 C.t. 750 C.k. 6258
1a >512 >512 >512 1a >512 >512 >512 >512
1b 128 128 >512 1b 256 256 256 512
1c 512 512 >512 1c 128 128 128 256
1d >512 >512 >512 1d 128 16 32 32
1e >512 >512 >512 1e 8 8 8 64
1f >512 128 >512 1f 8 16 32 16
1g 512 128 >512 1g 32 16 16 16
1h 512 256 >512 1h 512 128 512 >512
1i 256 128 >512 1i 32 16 16 64
1j >512 >512 >512 1j 256 128 256 256
1k >512 >512 >512 1k 64 64 64 128
1l 256 256 >512 1l 16 64 64 64
1m 256 512 512 1m 64 64 128 128
1n 256 256 >512 1n 4 8 4 64
1o 512 512 >512 1o 8 4 8 32
NRF 0.5 4 0.03 FCN 2 2 4 32
Antibacterial activity was estimated by using CLSI assay [15]. Abbreviations: S.a.: Antifungal activity was estimated by using CLSI assay [16]. Abbreviations: C.a.:
S. aureus; E.f.: E. faecalis; E.c.: E. coli; NRF: norfloxacin. C. albicans; C.p.: C. parapsilosis; C.t.: C. tropicalis; C.k.: C. krusei; FCN: fluconazole.
360 A. Catalano et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 64 (2013) 357e364
Fig. 2. Plot of pMIC vs CLogP data. Data not included in the regression model are
represented by square. Fig. 3. Docking poses for 1e (left) and 1n (right) in the active site of CA-CYP51. Ligands
and iron atom are displayed as ball and stick to help interpretation.
Fig. 4. Toxicity of 1o (left) and 1n (right) for THP-1 monocytes, as assessed by measuring LDH release (left axis) or trypan blue staining (right axis). Data are mean SD of 3 independent
determinations (when non visible, SD are smaller than the symbol). Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA with Dunnet’s post-hoc test vs control: *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01.
performed on silica gel columns by column chromatography on (%) 271 (Mþ, 13), 91 (100); 1H NMR (CDCl3): d 1.75e1.95 (m, 4H,
silica gel (Kieselgel 60, 0.040e0.063 mm, Merck, Darmstadt, Ger- CH2CH2CH2CH2), 2.71 (t, J ¼ 6.9 Hz, 2H, CH2eAr), 4.06 (t, J ¼ 5.6 Hz,
many) as described elsewhere [29e31]. TLC analyses were per- 2H, CH2eOAr), 6.92 (d, J ¼ 9.1 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.15e7.35 (m, 5H, Ar), 8.19
formed on precoated silica gel on aluminum sheets (Kieselgel 60 (d, J ¼ 9.1 Hz, 2H, Ar); 13C NMR (CDCl3): d 27.9 (1C), 28.8 (1C), 35.7
F254, Merck). (1C), 68.9 (1C), 114.6 (2C), 126.1 (2C), 126.2 (1C), 128.6 (4C), 141.6
(1C), 142.1 (1C), 164.4 (1C).
(d, J ¼ 8.5 Hz, 2H, Ar), 6.75 (d, J ¼ 9.1 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.15e7.35 (m, 5H, ether 1:1) to give 0.93 g (65%) of an orange solid: mp 163e164 C;
Ar); 13C NMR (CDCl3): d 31.2 (1C), 32.4 (1C), 67.9 (1C), 116.0 (2C), IR (KBr): 3436 (NH2) cm1; GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%) 194 (Mþ, 81),
116.9 (2C), 126.1 (1C), 128.7 (4C), 139.8 (1C), 141.9 (1C), 152.6 (1C). 165 (100); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): d 1.28 (t, J ¼ 6.9 Hz, 3H, CH3), 3.34
(br s, exch D2O, 2H, NH2), 3.96 (quartet, J ¼ 7.0 Hz, 2H, CH2), 6.64e
4.3.2. 4-(4-Phenylbutoxy)aniline (6h) 6.80 (m, 1H, Ar), 7.16e7.28 (m, 2H, Ar); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): d 15.5
Prepared as reported above for 6f starting from 3h. Yield: 90%; (1C), 64.1 (1C), 106.8 (1C), 114.0 (1C), 118.7 (1C), 132.5 (1C), 147.4
brown oil; IR (neat): 3361 (NH2) cm1; GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%) 241 (1C), 154.1 (1C), 165.4 (1C). Anal. calcd. for C9H10N2OS$0.17H2O
(Mþ, 53), 109 (100); 1H NMR (CDCl3): d 1.72e1.88 (m, 4H, (197.25) %: C, 54.80; H 5.28; N 14.20. Found: C, 55.02; H 5.13; N
CH2CH2CH2CH2), 2.62e2.75 (m, 2H, CH2eAr), 3.12 (br s, 2H, NH2), 13.92.
3.85e3.95 (m, 2H, CH2eOAr), 6.60e6.68 (m, 2H, Ar), 6.70e6.78 (m,
2H, Ar), 7.15e7.35 (m, 5H, Ar); 13C NMR (CDCl3): d 28.1 (1C), 29.3 4.5.1. 6-Methoxy-1,3-benzothiazol-2-amine (1b)
(1C), 35.9 (1C), 68.7 (1C), 116.0 (2C), 116.7 (2C), 126.0 (1C), 128.5 Prepared as reported above for 1c starting from 6b. Yield: 26%;
(2C), 128.7 (2C), 140.0 (1C), 142.5 (1C), 152.6 (1C). beige crystals: mp: 162e163 C (CHCl3/hexane); IR (KBr): 3388
(NH2) cm1; GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%) 180 (Mþ, 81), 165 (100); 1H
4.4. General procedure for the synthesis of 4-substituted anilines (5 NMR (DMSO-d6): d 3.32 (br s, exch D2O, 2H, NH2), 3.71 (s, 3H, CH3),
and 6e,n) 6.75e6.85 (m, 1H, Ar), 7.15e7.30 (m, 2H, Ar); 13C NMR (CDCl3):
d 56.1 (1C), 105.6 (1C), 113.9 (1C), 119.9 (1C), 132.9 (1C), 146.4 (1C),
The method adopted for the synthesis of 4- 155.9 (1C), 164.3 (1C). Anal. calcd. for C8H8N2OS$0.50H2O (189.24)
aminophenylmethanol (5) is described. Catalytic hydrogenation of %: C, 50.78; H 4.79; N 14.80. Found: C, 50.82; H 4.21; N 14.43.
4 (1.50 g, 9.8 mmol) in 30 mL of a mixture of MeOH and absolute
EtOH (2/1) was conducted at room temperature for 24 h in the 4.5.2. 6-Phenoxy-1,3-benzothiazol-2-amine (1d)
presence of 10% palladium on carbon at 10 bar. The catalyst was Prepared as reported above for 1c starting from 6d. Yield: 65%;
removed by filtration and the residue taken up with EtOAc and brown crystals: mp: 171e172 C (EtOAc/petroleum ether); GC/MS
washed with water. The solvent was removed to give 1.03 g (85%) of (70 eV) m/z (%) 242 (Mþ, 100). Anal. calcd. for C13H10N2OS$0.20H2O
a yellow solid which was recrystallized from EtOAc/petroleum (245.90) %: C, 63.50; H 4.26; N 11.39. Found: C, 63.80; H 3.89; N
ether to give 0.65 g of yellowish crystals: mp 65e66 C; GC/MS 11.41. Other spectroscopic data were in agreement with the litera-
(70 eV) m/z (%) 123 (Mþ, 100). Other spectroscopic data were in ture [13].
agreement with the literature [36].
4.5.3. 6-(Benzyloxy)-1,3-benzothiazol-2-amine (1e)
4.4.1. 4-Benzyloxyaniline (6e) Prepared as reported above for 1c starting from 6e. Yield: 20%;
Prepared as reported above for 5 starting from 3e. Yield: 90%; brown crystals: mp: 152e153 C (EtOAc/petroleum ether); IR (KBr):
dark green solid: mp 68e69 C; IR (KBr): 3355 (NH2) cm1; GC/MS 3436 (NH2) cm1; GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%) 256 (Mþ, 15), 165 (100); 1H
(70 eV) m/z (%) 199 (Mþ, 19), 108 (100); LC/MS m/z (%): 200 NMR (CDCl3): d 5.09 (s, 2H, CH2), 5.21 (br s, exch D2O, 2H, NH2), 6.98
(Mþ þ H). Other spectroscopic data were in agreement with the (dd, J ¼ 8.8, 2.5 Hz, 1H, Ar benzothiazole), 7.20 (d, J ¼ 2.5 Hz, 1H, Ar
literature [24]. benzothiazole), 7.28e7.48 (m, 6H, Ar); 13C NMR (CDCl3): d 71.1 (1C),
106.9 (1C), 114.8 (1C), 120.0 (1C), 127.7 (2C), 128.2 (1C), 128.8 (2C),
4.4.2. Synthesis of 4-[(4-chlorobenzyl)oxy]aniline (6n) 132.9 (1C), 137.2 (1C), 146.6 (1C), 155.1 (1C), 164.2 (1C). Anal. calcd.
Prepared as reported above for 5 starting from 3n. This reaction for C14H12N2OS$0.33H2O (262.32) %: C, 64.10; H 4.87; N 10.68.
was carried out at room temperature for 20 min in the presence of Found: C, 64.27; H 4.75; N 10.32.
10% palladium on carbon at 3 bar. Yield: 49%; brown crystals: mp
108e109 C (EtOAc/hexane); IR (KBr): 3366 (NH2) cm1; GC/MS 4.5.4. 6-(2-Phenylethoxy)-1,3-benzothiazol-2-amine (1f)
(70 eV) m/z (%) 233 (Mþ, 14), 108 (100); 1H NMR (CDCl3): d 3.44 (br Prepared as reported above for 1c starting from 6f. Prepared as
s, exch D2O, 2H, NH2), 4.95 (s, 2H, CH2), 6.58e6.67 (m, 2H, Ar), reported above for 1c starting from 6f. Yield: 59%; brown crystals:
6.75e6.85 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.34 (s, 4H, Ar). mp 116e117 C (EtOAc/hexane); IR (KBr): 3432 (NH2) cm1; GC/MS
(70 eV) m/z (%) 270 (Mþ, 100); 1H NMR (CDCl3): d 3.10 (t, J ¼ 7.1 Hz,
4.5. General procedure for the synthesis of 6-substituted-2-amino- 2H, CH2eAr), 4.18 (t, J ¼ 7.0 Hz, 2H, CH2eOAr), 5.19 (br s, exch D2O,
1,3-benzothiazoles (1bei) 2H, NH2), 6.90 (dd, J ¼ 8.8, 2.5 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.12 (d, J ¼ 2.5 Hz, 1H, Ar),
7.20e7.37 (m, 5H, Ar), 7.43 (d, J ¼ 8.8 Hz, 1H, Ar); 13C NMR (CDCl3):
The synthesis of 6-ethoxy-1,3-benzothiazol-2-amine (1c), ob- d 36.1 (1C), 69.8 (1C), 106.6 (1C), 114.6 (1C), 119.9 (1C), 126.7 (1C),
tained following a general procedure for the preparation of ami- 128.7 (2C), 129.2 (2C), 132.8 (1C), 138.4 (1C), 146.3 (1C), 155.1 (1C),
nobenzothiazoles described in the literature [13,14] is described. 164.2 (1C). Anal. calcd. for C15H14N2OS (270.35) %: C, 66.64; H 5.22;
Aniline 6c (1.0 g, 7.36 mmol) and NH4SCN (1.6 g, 21.9 mmol) were N 10.36. Found: C, 66.27; H 5.22; N 10.26.
dissolved in a 20% formic acideglacial acetic acid mixture
(100 mL) and cooled to 3 C with stirring, under N2. With the 4.5.5. 6-(3-Phenylpropoxy)-1,3-benzothiazol-2-amine (1g)
exclusion of light from the reaction mixture, bromine (0.30 mL Prepared as reported above for 1c starting from 6g. Yield: 41%;
dissolved in 20 mL of glacial acetic acid) was added dropwise, gold crystals: mp 126e127 C (EtOAc/hexane); IR (KBr): 3419
while the reaction temperature was kept between 3 C and 0 C. (NH2) cm1; GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%) 284 (Mþ, 81), 166 (100); 1H
The light shield was removed and the mixture was allowed to NMR (CDCl3): d 2.05e2.20 (m, 2H, CH2CH2CH2), 2.82 (t, J ¼ 7.6 Hz,
warm to room temperature overnight. Sodium hydroxide pellets 2H, CH2eAr), 3.96 (t, J ¼ 6.3 Hz, 2H, CH2eOAr), 5.18 (br s, exch D2O,
and ice were added with stirring until pH 11 was attained, and the 2H, NH2), 6.91 (dd, J ¼ 8.5, 2.6 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.11 (d, J ¼ 2.5 Hz, 1H, Ar),
mixture was extracted with EtOAc. The organic layer was sepa- 7.15e7.35 (m, 5H, Ar), 7.44 (d, J ¼ 8.5 Hz, 1H, Ar); 13C NMR (CDCl3):
rated and filtered through celite to remove polythiocyanogen d 31.1 (1C), 32.4 (1C), 67.9 (1C), 106.4 (1C), 114.6 (1C), 119.9 (1C),
(SCN)n. The organic layer was then washed with water, saturated 126.2 (1C), 128.8 (4C), 132.8 (1C), 141.7 (1C), 146.3 (1C), 155.3 (1C),
NaHCO3 and brine; then, the solvent was evaporated in vacuo. The 164.1 (1C). Anal. calcd. for C16H16N2OS (284.38) %: C, 67.58; H 5.67;
residue was purified by flash chromatography (EtOAc/petroleum N 9.85. Found: C, 67.52; H 5.60; N 9.81.
A. Catalano et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 64 (2013) 357e364 363
4.5.6. 6-(4-Phenylbutoxy)-1,3-benzothiazol-2-amine (1h) each bacterial strain were prepared in Cation Adjusted Muellere
Prepared as reported above for 1c starting from 6h. Yield: 62%; Hinton broth (CAMHB) and incubated at 37 C until the growth
beige solid: mp 98e99 C; IR (KBr): 3428 (NH2) cm1; GC/MS ceased. The turbidity of bacterial cell suspension was calibrated to
(70 eV) m/z (%) 298 (Mþ, 28), 166 (100); 1H NMR (CDCl3): d 1.70e 0.5 McFarland Standard by spectrophotometric method (625 nm,
1.90 (m, 4H, CH2CH2CH2CH2), 2.65e2.75 (m, 2H, CH2eAr), 3.90e range 0.08e0.10), and further the standardized suspension was
4.05 (m, 2H, CH2eOAr), 5.13 (br s, exch D2O, 2H, NH2), 6.89 (dd, diluted 1:100 with CAMHB to have 1e2 106 CFU/mL. All wells were
J ¼ 8.8, 2.5 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.11 (d, J ¼ 2.5 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.14e7.34 (m, 5H, seeded with 100 mL of inoculum. A number of wells containing only
Ar), 7.43 (d, J ¼ 8.8 Hz, 1H, Ar); 13C NMR (CDCl3): d 28.1 (1C), 29.1 inoculated broth as control growth were prepared. The plates were
(1C), 35.8 (1C), 68.7 (1C), 106.3 (1C), 114.5 (1C), 119.9 (1C), 126.0 incubated at 37 C for 24 h, and the MIC values were recorded as the
(1C), 128.6 (2C), 128.7 (2C), 132.9 (1C), 142.4 (1C), 146.3 (1C), 155.3 last well containing no bacterial growth. The MICs were determined
(1C), 164.1 (1C). Anal. calcd. for C17H18N2OS$0.2H2O (302.00) %: C, by using an antibacterial assay repeated twice in triplicate. Nor-
67.61; H 6.14; N 9.28. Found: C, 67.84; H 6.02; N 9.22. floxacin was used as reference drug.
medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and 2 mmol L- [11] A. Catalano, J.-F. Desaphy, G. Lentini, A. Carocci, A. Di Mola, C. Bruno,
R. Carbonara, A. De Palma, R. Budriesi, C. Ghelardini, M.G. Perrone,
glutamine/L in an atmosphere of 95% air/5% CO2. Cells were sub-
N.A. Colabufo, D. Conte Camerino, C. Franchini, J. Med. Chem. 55 (2012)
cultured every third day by gentle shaking, followed by pelleting and 1418e1422.
reseeding at a density of 3 103 cells/mL. The cultures were used [12] A. Carocci, A. Catalano, A. Lovece, G. Lentini, A. Duranti, V. Lucini, M. Pannacci,
after 2 days, when they reached a density of 0.1e5 106 cells/mL. F. Scaglione, C. Franchini, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 18 (2010) 6496e6511.
[13] J.B. Baell, P.J. Duggan, S.A. Forsyth, R.J. Lewis, Y.P. Lok, C.I. Schroeder, Bioorg.
Cells were incubated with compounds at increasing concentrations Med. Chem. 12 (2004) 4025e4037.
during 24 h and toxicity was evaluated using two assays in parallel, [14] K. Nagarajan, S.B. Hendi, A.N. Goud, H.G. Sen, B.N. Deb, Ind. J. Pharm. Sci. 48
namely the release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), a cytoplasmic (1991) 85e88.
[15] CLSI, Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that
enzyme, and trypan blue exclusion assay [39]. This method repre- Grow Aerobically. Approved Standard, eighth ed., Clinical and Laboratory
sents a valid alternative to the MTT assay previously performed Standards Institute, Wayne, PA, 2009. M7eA8.
[11,40]. LDH release was measured with the Roche LDH kit (cyto- [16] CLSI, Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of
Yeast. Approved standard, third ed., Clinical and Laboratory Standards Insti-
toxicity detection kit [LDH], Roche, Basel, Switzerland) in accordance tute, Wayne, PA, 2008. M27eA3.
with the manufacturer’s instructions. Percentage of LDH release was [17] J.E. Schuster, R. Fu, T. Siddique, C.J. Heckman, J. Neurophysiol. 107 (2012)
calculated relative to that of the control (cells incubated with 2% 484e492.
[18] C. Hansch, T. Fujita, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 86 (1964) 1616e1626.
DMSO; 0% LDH release), and that of cells lysed with Triton X-100 [19] H.V. Bossche, L. Koymans, Mycoses 41 (1998) 32e38.
(100% LDH release). For trypan blue assay, 90 ml of cell suspension [20] D.J. Sheehan, C.A. Hitchcock, C.M. Sibley, Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 12 (1999)
incubated with compounds were mixed with 10 mL Trypan blue re- 40e79.
[21] D. Lamb, D. Kelly, S. Kelly, Drug Res. Updat. 2 (1999) 390e402.
agent (1:9 ratio) and incubated for 2e3 min at room temperature.
[22] G.I. Lepesheva, M.R. Waterman, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1770 (2007) 467e477.
10 mL were transferred to a Burker counting chamber to determine [23] H. Ji, W. Zhang, Y. Zhou, M. Zhang, J. Zhu, Y. Song, J. Lü, J. Zhu, J. Med. Chem. 43
the number of viable (transparent) and non-viable (blue) cells. At (2000) 2493e2505.
least 200 cells were counted per condition. Percentage mortality was [24] H. Ji, W. Zhang, M. Zhang, M. Kudo, Y. Aoyama, Y. Yoshida, C. Sheng, Y. Song,
S. Yang, Y. Zhou, J. Lü, J. Zhu, J. Med. Chem. 46 (2003) 474e485.
determined as the ratio between the number of trypan blue labeled [25] J. Zhu, J. Lu, Y. Zhou, Y. Li, J. Cheng, C. Zheng, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16
cells and the total cell number. (2006) 5285e5289.
[26] A. Macchiarulo, G. Costantino, D. Fringuelli, A. Vecchierelli, F. Schiaffella,
R. Fringuelli, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 10 (2002) 3415e3423.
Acknowledgments [27] F. Schiaffella, A. Macchiarulo, L. Milanese, A. Vecchierelli, G. Costantino,
D. Pietrella, R. Fringuelli, J. Med. Chem. 48 (2005) 7658e7666.
This work was accomplished thanks to the financial support of [28] I.F. Sevrioukova, T.L. Poulos, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107 (2010) 18422e
18427.
the Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (MIUR). [29] M.M. Cavalluzzi, C. Bruno, G. Lentini, A. Lovece, A. Catalano, A. Carocci,
The authors kindly acknowledge Prof. Antonio Macchiarulo for C. Franchini, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 20 (2009) 1984e1991.
supplying the CA-CYP51 homology model. [30] A. Catalano, A. Carocci, F. Corbo, C. Franchini, M. Muraglia, A. Scilimati, M. De
Bellis, A. De Luca, D. Conte Camerino, M.S. Sinicropi, V. Tortorella, Eur. J. Med.
Chem. 43 (2008) 2923e2925.
References [31] C. Franchini, A. Carocci, A. Catalano, M.M. Cavalluzzi, F. Corbo, G. Lentini,
A. Scilimati, P. Tortorella, D. Conte Camerino, A. De Luca, J. Med. Chem. 46
[1] C. Pozzi, S. Ferrari, D. Cortesi, R. Lucini, R.M. Stroud, A. Catalano, M.P. Costi, (2003) 5238e5248.
S. Mangani, Acta Crystallogr. D68 (2012) 1232e1241. [32] U. Sharma, P.K. Verma, N. Kumar, V. Kumar, M. Bala, B. Singh, Chem. Eur. J. 17
[2] S.L. Khokra, K. Arora, H. Mehta, A. Aggarwal, M. Yadav, Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2 (2011) 5903e5907.
(2011) 1356e1377. [33] C.N. Carrigan, R.D. Bartlett, C.S. Esslinger, K.A. Cybulski, P. Tongcharoensirikul,
[3] R.V. Patel, P.K. Patel, P. Kumari, D.P. Rajani, K.H. Chikhalia, Eur. J. Med. Chem. R.J. Bridges, C.M. Thompson, J. Med. Chem. 45 (2002) 2260e2276.
53 (2012) 41e51. [34] A. Catalano, A. Carocci, G. Lentini, I. Defrenza, M.M. Cavalluzzi, C. Franchini,
[4] A. Gupta, S. Rawat, J. Curr. Pharm. Res. 3 (2010) 13e23. Drug Metab. Lett. 6 (2012) 124e128.
[5] G. Alang, R. Kaur, G. Kaur, A. Singh, P. Singla, Acta Pharm. Sci. 52 (2010) 213e218. [35] A. Catalano, A. Carocci, G. Lentini, I. Defrenza, C. Bruno, C. Franchini, Drug
[6] C. Franchini, M. Muraglia, F. Corbo, M. Florio, A. Di Mola, A. Rosato, R. Matucci, Metab. Lett. 6 (2012) 182e186.
M. Nesi, F. Bambeke, C. Vitali, Arch. Pharm. Chem. Life Sci. 342 (2009) 605e613. [36] H. Yang, Y. Li, J. Wang, H. Fu, Chem. Eur. J. 17 (2011) 5652e5660.
[7] D. Armenise, M. Muraglia, M.A. Florio, N. De Laurentis, A. Rosato, A. Carrieri, [37] G.M. Morris, R. Huey, W. Lindstrom, M.F. Sanner, R.K. Belew, D.S. Goodsell,
F. Corbo, C. Franchini, Arch. Pharm. Chem. Life Sci. 345 (2012) 407e416. A.J. Olson, J. Comput. Chem. 16 (2009) 2785e2791.
[8] J.K. Malik, F.V. Manvin, Nanjade S. Singh, Drug Invent. Today 1 (2009) 32e34. [38] S. Tsuchiya, M. Yamabe, Y. Yamaguchi, Y. Kobayashi, T. Konno, K. Tada, Int. J.
[9] A. Carocci, A. Catalano, F. Corbo, A. Duranti, R. Amoroso, C. Franchini, Cancer 26 (1980) 171e176.
G. Lentini, V. Tortorella, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 11 (2000) 3619e3634. [39] M.N. Berry, H.J. Halls, M.B. Grivell, Life Sci. 51 (1992) 1e16.
[10] R. Pascale, A. Carocci, A. Catalano, G. Lentini, A. Spagnoletta, M.M. Cavalluzzi, [40] A. Carocci, A. Catalano, C. Bruno, A. Lovece, M.G. Roselli, M.M. Cavalluzzi, F. De
F. De Santis, A. De Palma, V. Scalera, C. Franchini, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 18 Santis, A. De Palma, M.R. Rusciano, M. Illario, C. Franchini, G. Lentini, Bioorg.
(2010) 5903e5914. Med. Chem. 21 (2013) 847e851.