Swot Manual: (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, & Threats)
Swot Manual: (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, & Threats)
Swot Manual: (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, & Threats)
Manual
AY13
(Strengths, Weaknesses,
Opportunities, & Threats)
Contents
A SWOT analysis is a planning tool that, when used properly, provides an overall view of the most
important factors influencing the future of the program. The SWOT analysis is the foundation for a reflective
self-assessment of how your unit is performing its mission. The SWOT analysis results form the basis for
developing recommendations and action plans, also known as Quality Improvement Plans (QIPs). These
recommendations and action plans take into consideration many different internal and external factors that
maximize the potential of the program’s strengths and opportunities, while minimizing the impact of its
weaknesses and threats. This approach can help ensure efficient use of resources to provide beneficial
program outcomes. A SWOT analysis enables proactive thinking rather than habitual or instinctive reactions
A SWOT analysis is one of several tools for assessment and planning at Austin Community College. This
manual is meant to help understand the general SWOT analysis process, as well as provide detailed guidance
for a organizing and conducting a SWOT analysis.
• Units are required to conduct an intensive self -review on a 5-year rotating schedule. The Instructional
Program Review (IPR) and the Support Services Review (SSR) both follow the same general process.
• During an intensive review year, units participate in a facilitated SWOT analysis to determine what
their strengths and weaknesses are and how the environment will affect their ability to accomplish their
mission
A SWOT analysis is a simple, but powerful, framework for leveraging the unit’s strengths, improving
weaknesses, minimizing threats, and taking the greatest possible advantage of opportunities.
A SWOT analysis is a subjective assessment of data that is organized into a four- dimensional SWOT matrix,
similar to a basic two-heading list of pros and cons.
Strengths Weaknesses
• what the unit does very well where functions are performed
internally internally less than preferred
Opportunities
potentially favorable S&O: Pursue opportunities that are a W-O: Overcome weaknesses to pursue
external conditions for good fit with the program’s strengths. opportunities
the unit
Threats
potentially unfavorable S-T: Identify ways the program can W-T: Establish a defensive plan to prevent
use its strengths to reduce its the program’s weaknesses from making it
external conditions for
vulnerability to external threats. highly susceptible to external threats.
the unit
To develop initiatives (strategies) that take into account the SWOT profile, unit members can translate the four
lists into a matrix (see above) that associates strengths (maintain, build and leverage), opportunities (prioritize
and optimize), weaknesses (remedy), and threats (counter) into actions that can be agreed and owned by the
unit.
SWOT Materials
The facilitator is responsible for providing the following materials for the SWOT session. If you are going to
conduct (facilitate) a SWOT session yourself, you will be responsible for providing these materials.
• The facilitator should introduce the group and set some ground rules/ guidelines.
• The facilitator should lead a discussion about the unit/program’s data and how they relate to the
unit/program’s performance of its mission. This will help illuminate existing strengths and
weaknesses. The strengths and weaknesses should help identify possible opportunities and threats.
• After the discussion of the data, the facilitator will walk the participants through the process of
brainstorming about each of the SWOT elements, one at a time (e.g. Strengths first, then Weaknesses,
then Opportunities, then Threats). Participants will be asked to relate their thoughts or comments to
the data and write them down on the Post Its.
NOTE: While conducting the session, encourage participants to use phrases that are clearly understood
when writing out suggestions or comments for posting.
• Clarify SWOT statements during the session to ensure “context” of statement in future discussions and
analyses.
o Weaknesses – what aspects of the unit/program, which, if not addressed, will impede the
area's future?
o Opportunities – what factors, which the unit/program needs to take advantage of that,
might enhance the quality of the area.
o Threats – what external factors could negatively affect the unit/program’s future?
SWOT Process:
o The facilitator should circle the room continuously collecting the post-its.
o The notes should be placed in a random pattern across the front of the group minimizing and
ensuring that they are not “clumped” with or by any bias.
o When the group seems to have finished with writing topics, the facilitator should then proceed
to read aloud the entire list on the wall.
o Next, the SWOT participants are encouraged to come up and “group” the topics into “themes”
or likenesses.
o The facilitator will next work with the participants to collectively come to an agreement and
agree on a “title” for each of clusters...
o There may be a massaging of the groupings upon the themes that are brought out.
NOTE: Once all statements have been reviewed on the board, for the purpose of more efficient and accurate
processing/ reporting, the facilitator is asked to stack the Post-its according to the identified categories. This
will allow the person creating the SWOT report to quickly (and more reliably) input the data.
NOTE: There may be a need for the facilitator to keep the focus of the group on task. The group may start to
wander off topic and into another area of the SWOT process.
1. NEED – Is the need for the program/unit increasing, decreasing, staying the same?
2. COST –
a. Are program/unit costs increasing, decreasing, staying the same?
b. In what areas is our budget adequate/inadequate?
Some of the following areas will be specifically applicable to instructional programs and some
to administrative units. Some areas will be applicable to both. Choose areas that are relevant
and/or correlate to your program/unit’s data.
Student Achievement
Are graduation/transfer rates a concern?
Student Retention
Are course completion rates higher/lower than average?
Student Outcomes
How do students do at transfer institutions?
How do students do on the job?
What other kinds of outcomes are important to us?
Access
P a g e |6 Austin Community College SWOT Team manual
Is the gender/ethnicity of our students a concern?
Can students take courses at different times/places/methods?
Are we offering enough/too many/about the right number of sections/services?
Can student get timely services? Possible barriers?
Curriculum
Is curriculum current and reflective of our field?
What are changes that we see coming in our discipline?
Is the curriculum aligned with UT/SWT and others?
Is the curriculum articulated with UT/SWT and others?
Instruction
How are we accommodating educational theory in the ways we teach?
How will changes in delivery of instruction affect our area?
Technology
How are we accommodating technology in the ways we teach?
How will changes in technology affect our area?
Are we using technology sufficiently in providing service?
How can we improve or maximize our technological resources for better effectiveness?
Faculty/ Staff Development
In what areas are our faculty/staff strong?
Where do we need to focus faculty/staff development?
Diversity
Is diversity of faculty/staff strong?
Is diversity of students strong?
Student Satisfaction
What do we know about how our students feel regarding our courses/ services?
Transfer
What do we know about how transfer institutions regard our courses/students?
Are transfer institutions making any changes that will affect us?
Delivery of Services
Are we delivering timely service?
Are we providing quality service to our students and stakeholders?
What’s NEXT?
The SWOT analysis should result in a list of the issues that are the most pertinent for the program/unit area at
this time. These will form the basis for any QIP (Quality Improvement Plan).
At the end of the SWOT analysis, the facilitator will collect and stack the Post-its in respective groupings and
either
o return them to the OIEA office for processing
OR
o the facilitator may wish to use the SWOT report and enter the data themselves.
As part of the overall review of the program or unit, it is required that the following actions be taken
prior to conducting the program’s/ unit’s SWOT session. This will help maximize the benefits of the
SWOT session and analysis.
• Prior to SWOT session – To allow time to review data, it is recommended that the data be
provided to participants AND facilitator no later than 2-3 weeks prior to the SWOT session.
o SSR data should be identified and related to the unit’s mission and purpose
The unit’s mission statement or purpose should be used as a basis/guide for selecting
the appropriate data to review.
Examples of data could include:
• Point-of-Service Surveys
• Departmental Performance Metrics
• CAS Standards Metrics
• Scheduling Data
• Time Served Data
• Benchmark Data
NOTE: Appointment Slots Can NOT have the date/ time adjusted by either the facilitator or the
requestor. If you must change meeting you MUST select another appointment slot.
5. Provide water/ beverages/ snacks. This is optional, but recommended, as the SWOT session is
scheduled for 3 hours or more. (Not provided by OIEA; Follow administrative rules)
4.