Laryngeal Complications After Thyroidectomy: Is It Always The Surgeon?
Laryngeal Complications After Thyroidectomy: Is It Always The Surgeon?
Laryngeal Complications After Thyroidectomy: Is It Always The Surgeon?
Hypothesis: Laryngeal dysfunction after thyroidec- Results: The overall rate of laryngeal complications was
tomy is a common complication. However, few data are 42.0% (320 patients). Complications from an injury to
available to differentiate whether these complications re- the vocal folds occurred in 31.3% of patients. Weakness
sult from injury to the recurrent nerve or to the vocal or paresis of the recurrent nerve was initially present in
folds from intubation. 6.6% and was related to the nerves at risk. This rate was
higher in revision thyroidectomies than in primary sur-
Setting: University medical center. gical interventions (6.2% vs 11.6%; P=.04). The rate of
laryngeal injuries was higher in patients older than 65
Patients: Seven hundred sixty-one patients who years (39.8% vs 30.8%; P =.03).
underwent surgery to the thyroid gland from 1990 to
Conclusions: These data suggest that laryngeal compli-
2002. Of these patients, 8.4% underwent a revision
cations after thyroidectomies are primarily caused by in-
thyroidectomy. jury to the vocal folds from intubation and to a lesser ex-
tent by injury to the laryngeal nerve. We recommend
Intervention: Preoperative and postoperative laryngo-
documentation of informed consent, especially for pa-
stroboscopic examination. tients who use their voice professionally, such as sing-
ers, actors, or teachers.
Main Outcome Measure: Laryngostroboscopic evalu-
ation of laryngeal complications. Arch Surg. 2009;144(2):149-153
L
ARYNGEAL COMPLICATIONS AF- going thyroidectomy, the descriptions of
ter thyroidectomy are a com- vocal fold injury are missing. In smaller
mon problem.1-5 The leading groups of patients undergoing thyroidec-
cause of the problem is in- tomy, laryngeal dysfunction was noted by
jury to the recurrent nerve. Stojadinovic et al16 in 2 of 15 symptomatic
Studies performed on large groups of pa- and 2 of 30 asymptomatic patients and by
tients show a prevalence for permanent palsy de Pedro Netto et al17 in 28 of 100 patients.
of the recurrent nerve ranging from 0% In the present study, we sought to deter-
mine the incidence and characteristics of in-
tubation-related vocal fold injuries after thy-
Author Affiliations: Institute See Invited Critique roidectomy in a large group of patients.
for Musicians’ Medicine, at end of article
Freiburg University Medical
Center, Freiburg
METHODS
after primary surgery to 20% after revision
(Drs Echternach and Richter),
Department of Anaesthesiology,
surgery.1-5 Tracheal intubation can lead to A total of 1001 patients were included in the
Rostock University, Rostock hoarseness as well.6,7 The incidence of la- study between 1990 and 2002. All patients
(Dr Mencke), Department of ryngeal injuries caused by intubation is con- scheduled for thyroidectomy underwent pre-
Surgery, Saarland University sidered to be about 6% to 70% after surgi- operative evaluation of the vocal folds. Over-
Medical Center, Homburg cal procedures not adjacent to the larynx.6,8-13 all, 240 patients failed to appear for postop-
(Dr Schilling), and Department To date, there are few data concerning in- erative examination of the vocal folds at our
of Otorhinolaryngology, juries to the vocal folds after surgery in university medical center (reasons included re-
Asklepios Hospital Harburg, fusal of reexamination, subjective rejection of
Hamburg (Dr Verse), Germany;
close relationship to the larynx. Although reevaluation because of good vocal quality, or
and Department of Surgery, Musholt et al14 and Lombardi et al15 report reevaluation by an otolaryngologist at an-
Liestal Hospital, Liestal, that hoarseness is increased and videolaryn- other institution) and were excluded from the
Switzerland (Dr Maurer). goscopy was performed in patients under- analysis.
(REPRINTED) ARCH SURG/ VOL 144 (NO. 2), FEB 2009 WWW.ARCHSURG.COM
149
(REPRINTED) ARCH SURG/ VOL 144 (NO. 2), FEB 2009 WWW.ARCHSURG.COM
150
(REPRINTED) ARCH SURG/ VOL 144 (NO. 2), FEB 2009 WWW.ARCHSURG.COM
151
(REPRINTED) ARCH SURG/ VOL 144 (NO. 2), FEB 2009 WWW.ARCHSURG.COM
152
INVITED CRITIQUE
(REPRINTED) ARCH SURG/ VOL 144 (NO. 2), FEB 2009 WWW.ARCHSURG.COM
153
Correction
(REPRINTED) ARCH SURG/ VOL 144 (NO. 5), MAY 2009 WWW.ARCHSURG.COM
412