Jurnal Kel 6
Jurnal Kel 6
Jurnal Kel 6
Isolation in Conifers
Leila do Nascimento Vieira1, Helisson Faoro2, Hugo Pacheco de Freitas Fraga1, Marcelo Rogalski3,
Emanuel Maltempi de Souza2, Fábio de Oliveira Pedrosa2, Rubens Onofre Nodari1, Miguel
Pedro Guerra1*
1 Departamento de Fitotecnia, Programa de Pós Graduação em Recursos Genéticos Vegetais, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil,
2 Departamento de Bioquı́mica e Biologia Molecular, Núcleo de Fixação Biológica de Nitrogênio, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil, 3 Departamento
de Biologia Vegetal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Abstract
Background: Performing chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) isolation is considered a major challenge among different plant groups,
especially conifers. Isolating chloroplasts in conifers by such conventional methods as sucrose gradient and high salt has not
been successful. So far, plastid genome sequencing protocols for conifer species have been based mainly on long-range
PCR, which is known to be time-consuming and difficult to implement.
Methodology/Principal Findings: We developed a protocol for cpDNA isolation using three different conifer families:
Araucaria angustifolia and Araucaria bidwilli (Araucariaceae), Podocarpus lambertii (Podocarpaceae) and Pinus patula
(Pinaceae). The present protocol is based on high salt isolation buffer followed by saline Percoll gradient. Combining these
two strategies allowed enhanced chloroplast isolation, along with decreased contamination caused by polysaccharides,
polyphenols, proteins, and nuclear DNA in cpDNA. Microscopy images confirmed the presence of intact chloroplasts in high
abundance. This method was applied to cpDNA isolation and subsequent sequencing by Illumina MiSeq (26250 bp), using
only 50 ng of cpDNA. Reference-guided chloroplast genome mapping showed that high average coverage was achieved for
all evaluated species: 24.63 for A. angustifolia, 135.97 for A. bidwilli, 1196.10 for P. lambertii, and 64.68 for P. patula.
Conclusion: Results show that this improved protocol is suitable for enhanced quality and yield of chloroplasts and cpDNA
isolation from conifers, providing a useful tool for studies that require isolated chloroplasts and/or whole cpDNA sequences.
Citation: Vieira LdN, Faoro H, Fraga HPdF, Rogalski M, de Souza EM, et al. (2014) An Improved Protocol for Intact Chloroplasts and cpDNA Isolation in
Conifers. PLoS ONE 9(1): e84792. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084792
Editor: Steven M. Theg, University of California - Davis, United States of America
Received September 17, 2013; Accepted November 27, 2013; Published January 2, 2014
Copyright: ß 2014 Vieira et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was supported by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nı́vel Superior (CAPES) and Conselho Nacional de desenvolvimento
Cientı́fico e Tecnológico (CNPq) with fellowships, and by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Estado de Santa Catarina (FAPESC) under project number
14848/2011-2, 3770/2012, and 2780/2012-4. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the
manuscript.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
* E-mail: [email protected]
Protocols
The three chloroplast DNA isolation methods used here are
described as follows:
A) High salt plus saline Percoll gradient method
(Figure 1). All the following steps were carried out at 0uC, if
not otherwise stated.
5. The pellet was gently resuspended in 12 ml of wash buffer attached to the chloroplast membrane, followed by centrifu-
(Table 1) using a paintbrush. gation at 3500 g for 20 min at 4uC. The supernatant was
6. Homogenate was divided into 6 tubes (50 ml), each containing discarded.
20 ml Percoll (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) gradient 6. The pellet was resuspended again with 250 ml wash buffer and
(70%–30%) and then centrifuged at 5000 g for 25 min at 4uC. centrifuged at 3500 g for 20 min at 4uC to obtain the final
The interface 70%–30% containing chloroplasts was collected. chloroplast pellet.
7. Collected interface containing chloroplasts was washed twice
C) Sucrose gradient method [33].
with 100 ml of wash buffer and centrifuged at 3000 g for
20 min at 4uC to obtain the purified chloroplast pellet. 1. Prior to extraction, about 25 g (fresh weight) of young needles
were collected and kept in dark for 72 h at 4uC in order to
B) Modified high salt method [32]. All the following steps
decrease the starch level stored in the leaves. Fresh needles
were carried out at 0uC, if not otherwise stated.
were cleaned with distilled water.
1. Prior to extraction, 25 g (fresh weight) of young needles were 2. Needles were homogenized in 400 ml of ice-cold isolation
collected and kept in dark for 72 h at 4uC to decrease starch buffer (Table 1) for 30 s. The homogenate was filtered into
level stored in the needles. Fresh needles were cleaned with centrifuge bottles using two layers of Miracloth by softly
distilled water. squeezing the cloth.
2. Needles were homogenized in 400 ml of isolation buffer 3. The homogenate was centrifuged at 200 g for 15 min at 4uC.
(Table 1) for 30 s. Homogenate was filtered into centrifuge The nucleus pellet and cell-wall debris were discarded. The
bottles, using two layers of Miracloth (Calbiochem, San Diego, supernatant included chloroplasts suspended in it.
CA) by softly squeezing the cloth. 4. The supernatant was centrifuged at a higher centrifugal force
3. The homogenate was centrifuged twice at 200 g for 20 min at (2000 g) for 20 min at 4uC, and the resulting chloroplast pellet
4uC. The nucleus pellet and cell-wall debris were discarded. showed some contamination.
Supernatant included chloroplasts suspended in it. 5. The pellet was resuspended in 7 ml of ice-cold wash buffer
4. The supernatant was submitted to a higher centrifugal force (Table 1), using a soft paintbrush.
(3500 g) for 20 min at 4uC, resulting in a chloroplast pellet 6. The homogenate was gently loaded into 6 tubes (50 ml)
contaminated with some nuclear DNA. containing sucrose step gradient consisting of 18 ml of 52%
5. The pellet was gently resuspended in 250 ml of wash buffer sucrose and overlaid with 7 ml of 30% sucrose.
(Table 1), using a paintbrush to wash the nuclear DNA 7. Step gradients were centrifuged at 3500 g for 60 min at 4uC.
Table 1. Composition of chloroplast isolation buffers and wash buffers for modified high salt method, high salt plus saline Percoll
method and sucrose gradient method.
High salt plus saline Percoll method Modified high salt method [32] Sucrose gradient [33]
Isolation Buffer (pH 3.8) Isolation Buffer (pH 3.8) Isolation Buffer
Wash Buffer (pH 8.0) Wash Buffer (pH 8.0) Wash Buffer
Both BSA and DTT were added just before the start of the experiment.
Percoll gradient solutions consisted of wash buffer with Percoll at a final concentration of 70% (v/v) and 30% (v/v).
Sucrose gradient solutions consisted of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 25 mM EDTA and sucrose addition for a final concentration of 52% sucrose (w/v) and 30% (w/v)
sucrose.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084792.t001
Figure 2. Chloroplast visualization of Araucaria angustifolia in phase contrast microscopy. (A) Chloroplasts isolated with improved high salt
method; (B) Chloroplasts isolated with sucrose method; (C) Chloroplasts isolated with high salt plus Percoll method; (D–F) Micrographs during
chloroplast isolation with high salt plus saline Percoll method; (D) Broken and intact chloroplasts before Percoll gradient centrifugation; (E) Intact
isolated chloroplasts in interface 70/30% after Percoll gradient centrifugation; (F) Broken chloroplasts in upper 30% phase after Percoll gradient
centrifugation. Dotted arrows indicate broken chloroplasts. Solid arrows indicate intact chloroplasts. Bar –50 mM.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084792.g002
8. The band from the 30–52% interface containing chloroplasts Chloroplast DNA Isolation
was collected, diluted twice with 200 ml of wash buffer, and Chloroplast DNA isolation was the same for all chloroplast
centrifuged at 1500 g for 15 min at 4uC to gain the purified pellets obtained using the three different isolation methods. DNA
chloroplast pellet. isolation buffer consisted of 100 mM NaCl, 100 mM Tris-HCl
(pH 8.0), 50 mM EDTA, and 1 mM DTT.
Figure 4. Reference graph track showing observed coverage values. Different colors show the minimum (light blue), mean (blue), and
maximum (dark blue) observed coverage values for all genomic regions (data aggregation above 100 bp). Araucaria angustifolia, Araucaria bidwilli,
and Podocarpus lambertii sequence reads were mapped on Podocarpus totara; Pinus patula sequence reads were mapped on Pinus thunbergii.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084792.g004
high salt and sucrose methods, bands in agarose gel revealed the the use of the technique. A reference-guided chloroplast genome
presence of degraded DNA, indicating contamination with nuclear mapping was performed to estimate the genome average coverage
DNA and polysaccharides (Fig. 3A, B, respectively), while isolated (Fig. 4). The cpDNA sequencing generated a high average
cpDNA formed a well-defined band, which is indicative of high coverage for all species evaluated: 24.63 for A. angustifolia, 135.97
purity and polysaccharide-free cpDNA (Fig. 3C). for A. bidwilli, 1,196.10 for P. lambertii, and 64.68 for P. patula
In addition, Nanodrop evaluation indicated higher cpDNA (Table 4). Thus, in this study, all of the reference genomes were
yield with the high salt plus saline Percoll method, about 3 times sufficiently covered for assembly.
higher when compared to high salt methods and almost 9 times This protocol presents higher genome coverage when compared
higher when compared to the sucrose method. Enhanced 260/280 to protocols recently applied to conifers chloroplast genome
and 260/230 ratios were observed in the high salt plus saline sequencing, as those using total DNA followed by PCR
Percoll method, 2.05 and 1.99, respectively (Table 2). These ratios amplification with degenerated primers that resulted in genome
indicate a high purity of isolated cpDNA, which is a prerequisite coverage only about 8-fold [11,20]. Furthermore, this strategy is
for whole chloroplast sequencing. In the two other methods time-consuming and difficult to implement because of differences
evaluated, contamination was observed with polyphenols and in gene organization among different plant species. Cryptomeria
polysaccharides (Table 2). Moreover, when we used the sucrose japonica cp genome was sequenced using sucrose gradient method,
method, a highly contaminated and oxidized DNA pellet was followed by DNA isolation with phenol/chloroform, DNA
obtained. Taken together, we considered the high salt plus saline purification with DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN) and ATP-
Percoll protocol as having the best yield and quality for cpDNA dependent DNase (TOYOBO) [19]. As shown in the present
isolation from A. angustifolia. Thus, this method was applied to work, the protocol based on saline buffer followed by Percoll
cpDNA isolation of A. bidwilli, P. patula and P. lambertii. As gradient results in higher quality DNA than sucrose gradient.
expected, a high quality in cpDNA isolated from all evaluated Moreover, all these purification steps applied to the isolated DNA,
species was realized at 260/280.1.95 and 260/230.1.74 ratios
such as the utilization of ATP-dependent DNase, led to a lower
(Table 3). All species showed cpDNA yield similar to A. angustifolia,
DNA yield [32].
with the exception of P. lambertii. However, even its cpDNA yield
In summary, the results obtained in the present work show that
was sufficient for sequencing (Table 3).
these improvements in the general protocol for chloroplasts and
cpDNA isolation in conifers enhance the overall quality and yield
Chloroplast Genome Sequencing of chloroplasts and cpDNA isolation, providing a useful tool for
Improving technologies have made DNA sequencing faster,
studies that require isolated chloroplasts and/or plastid genome
more accurate and far cheaper, creating opportunities to sequence
sequence. Facilitating chloroplast sequencing of this species group
the whole chloroplast genome in order to perform evolutionary
and, hence, increasing the amount of information about the plastid
and phylogenomic studies. To test the quality of cpDNA isolated
genome of conifers may, in turn, lead to greater understanding
by our new method, we sequenced the plastid genome of four
about plant evolution, as well as the structural and functional
conifer species (A. angustifolia, A. bidwilli, P. patula and P. lambertii)
genomics in plants other than conifers.
using the Illumina sequencing technology.
To estimate the efficiency of chloroplast genome sequence
assembly with our cpDNA isolation protocol, we sequenced these Author Contributions
four chloroplast genomes by using MiSeq Illumina sequencing Conceived and designed the experiments: LNV MR MPG RON EMS
with only 50 ng of cpDNA. In other sequencing protocols, about FOP. Performed the experiments: LNV HPFF HF MR. Analyzed the data:
5–10 mg [32,33] were used for sequencing, thereby increasing the LNV HF HPFF. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: EMS FOP
amount of plant material required for isolation and often limiting RON MPG. Wrote the paper: LNV MR MPG.
References
1. Kaneko T, Sato S, Kotani H, Tanaka A, Asamizu E, et al. (1996) Sequence 10. Wu CS, Wang YN, Hsu CY, Lin CP, Chaw SM (2011) Loss of different inverted
analysis of the genome of the unicellular cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. strain repeat copies from the chloroplast genomes of Pinaceae and Cupressophytes and
PCC6803: II. Sequence determination of the entire genome and assignment of influence of heterotachy on the evaluation of gymnosperm phylogeny. Genome
potential protein-coding regions. DNA Res 3: 109–136. Biol Evol 3: 1284–1295.
2. Wolfe KH, Morden CW, Palmer JD (1992) Function and evolution of a minimal 11. Yi X, Gao L, Wang B, Su YJ, Wang T (2013) The complete chloroplast genome
plastid genome from a non-photosynthetic parasitic plant. Proc Natl Acad Sci sequence of Cephalotaxus oliveri (Cephalotaxaceae): evolutionary comparison of
USA 89: 10648–10652. Cephalotaxus chloroplast DNAs and insights into the loss of inverted repeat
3. Chumley TW, Palmer JD, Mower JP, Boore JL, Fourcade HM, et al. (2006) The copies in Gymnosperms. Genome Biol Evol 5: 688–698.
complete chloroplast genome sequence of Pelargonium6hortorum: organization and 12. Rogalski M, Schoettler MA, Thiele W, Schulze WX, Bock R (2008) Rpl33, a
evolution of the largest and most highly rearranged chloroplast genome of land nonessential plastid encoded ribosomal protein in tobacco, is required under
plants. Mol Biol Evol 23: 1–16. cold stress conditions. Plant Cell 20: 2221–2237.
4. Timmis JN, Ayliffe MA, Huang CY, Martin W (2004) Endosymbiotic gene 13. Alkatib S, Scharff LB, Rogalski M, Fleischmann TT, Matthes A, et al. (2012)
transfer: organelle genomes forge eukaryotic chromosomes. Nat Rev Genet 5: The contributions of wobbling and superwobbling to the reading of the genetic
123–135. code. PLoS Genet. 8(11): e1003076.
5. Wolf PG, Roper JM, Duffy AM (2010) The evolution of chloroplast genome 14. Clarke JL, Daniell H, Nugent JM (2011) Chloroplast biotechnology, genomics
structure in ferns. Genome 53: 731–738. and evolution: current status, challenges and future directions. Plant Mol Biol.
6. Greiner S, Bock R (2013) Tuning a ménage à trois: Co-evolution and co- 76: 207–209.
adaptation of nuclear and organellar genomes in plants. Bioessays 35: 354–365. 15. Maliga P, Bock R (2011) Plastid biotechnology: food, fuel and medicine for the
7. Moore MJ, Bell CD, Soltis PS, Soltis DE (2007) Using plastid genomic-scale data 21st century. Plant Physiol 155: 1501–1510.
to resolve enigmatic relationships among basal angiosperms. Proc Natl Acad Sci 16. Rogalski M, Carrer H (2011) Engineering plastid fatty acid biosynthesis to
USA 104: 19363–19368. improve food quality and biofuel production in higher plants. Plant Biotechnol J
8. Jansen RK, Cai Z, Raubeson LA, Daniell H, dePamphilis CW, et al. (2007) 9: 554–564.
Analysis of 81 genes from 64 plastid genomes resolves relationships in 17. Bock R (2013) Strategies for metabolic pathway engineering with multiple
angiosperms and identifies genome-scale evolutionary patterns. Proc Natl Acad transgenes. Plant Mol Biol doi: 10.1007/s11103-013-0045-0.
Sci USA 104: 19369–19374. 18. Wu CS, Wang YN, Liu SM, Chaw SM (2007) Chloroplast genome (cpDNA) of
9. Moore MJ, Soltis PS, Bell CD, Burleigh JG, Soltis DE (2010) Phylogenetic Cycas taitungensis and 56 cp protein-coding genes of Gnetum parvifolium: insights
analysis of 83 plastid genes further resolves the early diversification of eudicots. into cpDNA evolution and phylogeny of extant seed plants. Mol Biol Evol 24:
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 4623–4628. 1366–1379.
19. Hirao T, Watanabe A, Kurita M, Kondo T, Takata K (2008) Complete 31. Rousseau-Gueutin M, Ayliffe MA, Timmis JN (2011) Conservation of plastid
nucleotide sequence of the Cryptomeria japonica D. Don. chloroplast genome and sequences in the plant nuclear genome for millions of years facilitates
comparative chloroplast genomics: diversified genomic structure of coniferous endosymbiotic evolution. Plant Physiol 157: 2181–2193.
species. BMC Plant Biol 8: 70–78. 32. Shi C, Hu N, Huang H, Gao J, Zhao Y, et al. (2012) An improved chloroplast
20. Lin CP, Huang JP, Wu CS, Hsu CY, Chaw SM (2010) Comparative chloroplast DNA extraction procedure for whole plastid genome sequencing. PLoS ONE 7:
genomics reveals the evolution of Pinaceae genera and subfamilies. Genome Biol e31468.
Evol 2: 504–517. 33. Jansen RK, Raubeson LA, Boore JL, dePamphilis CW, Chumley TW et al.
21. Werner O, Patino J, Gonzáles-Mancebo JM, Gabriel RMD, Ros RM (2009) (2005) Methods for obtaining and analyzing whole chloroplast genome
The taxonomic status and the geographical relationships of the Macaronesian sequences. Methods Enzymol 395: 348–384.
endemic moss Fissidens luisieri (Fissidentaceae) based on DNA sequence data. 34. Walker DA, Cerovic ZEG, Robinson SP (1987) Isolation of intact chloroplasts:
Bryologist 112: 315–324. general principles and criteria of integrity. Methods Enzymol 148: 145–157.
22. Wakasugi T, Tsudzuki J, Ito S, Nakashima K, Tsudzuki T, et al. (1994) Loss of 35. Diekmann K, Hodkinson TR, Fricke E, Barth S (2008) An optimized chloroplast
all ndh genes as determined by sequencing the entire chloroplast genome of the DNA extraction protocol for grasses (Poaceae) prove suitable for whole plastid
black pine Pinus thunbergii. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 9794–9798.
genome sequencing and SNP detection. PLoS ONE 3: e2813.
23. Cronn R, Liston A, Parks M, Gernandt GS, Shen R, et al. (2008) Multiplex
36. Kubis SE, Lilley KS, Jarvis P (2008) Isolation and preparation of chloroplast
sequencing of plant chloroplast genomes using Solexa sequencing-by-synthesis
from Arabidopsis thaliana plants. In: Posch A, editor. 2D-PAGE: sample
technology. Nucleic Acids Res 36: e122.
preparation and fractionation: Humana Press. 171–183.
24. Palmer JD, Sein DB (1986) Conservation of chloroplast genome structure among
vascular plants. Curr Genet 11: 823–834. 37. Mastroberti AA, Mariath JEA (2003) Leaf anatomy of Araucaria angustifolia
25. Bookjans G, Stummann BM, Henningsen KW (1984) Preparation of chloroplast (Bertol.) Kuntze (Araucariacea). Rev Bras Bot 26: 343–353.
DNA from pea plastids isolated in a medium of high ionic strength. Anal 38. Yamamoto ES, Otto A, Simoneit BRT (2004) Lignans and resin of Araucaria
Biochem 141: 244–247. angustifolia by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. J Mass Spectrom 39:
26. Keeling CI, Bohlmann J (2006) Diterpene resin acids in conifers. Phytochem 67: 1337–1347.
2415–2423. 39. Arif IA, Bakir MA, Khan HA, Ahamed A, Farhan AH, et al. (2010) A simple
27. Atherton RA, McComish BJ, Shepherd LD, Berry LA, Albert NW, et al. (2010) method for DNA extraction from mature date palm leaves: impact of sand
Whole genome sequencing of enriched chloroplast DNA using the Illumina grinding and composition of lysis buffer. Int J Mol Sci 11: 3149–3157.
GAII platform. Plant Methods 6: 22. 40. Gargano D, Maple-Grødem J, Reisinger V, Eichacker LA, Mølle SG (2013)
28. Ayliffe MA, Timmis JN (1992) Tobacco nuclear DNA contains long tracts of Analysis of the chloroplast proteome in arc mutants and identification of novel
homology to chloroplast DNA. Theor Appl Genet 85: 229–238. protein components associated with FtsZ2. Plant Mol Biol 81: 235–244.
29. Ayliffe MA, Scott NS, Timmis JN (1998) Analysis of plastid DNA like sequences 41. He ZH, Li HL, Shen Y, Li ZS, Mi H (2013) Comparative analysis of the
within the nuclear genomes of higher plants. Mol Biol Evol 15: 738–745. chloroplast proteomes of a wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) single seed descent line
30. Goremykin VV, Salamini F, Velasco R, Viola R (2009) Mitochondrial DNA of and its parents. J Plant Physiol doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2013.03.016.
Vitis vinifera and the issue of rampant horizontal gene transfer. Mol Biol Evol 26:
99–110.