Método de Nakamura 1989 Microtremores 1
Método de Nakamura 1989 Microtremores 1
Método de Nakamura 1989 Microtremores 1
UA RTERLY
EPURT
V01. No.1
" 78094 it, 7T2Tti o2TTY irrccs CD C3 C3 LO f isU4kms CD TTTT7rc02 T2acfrTs TiT2Te0oTsTjT T" 14002 macs r
E
lI—|
Hl7.I]l'lnD kmilf 2 .on zorur rr-6 sh 10km
I V W I *__.
I i “Q 010'! “LO:rD OD . Ac: '_.C:r :rC'J
.3. 3
3 Oi :;rC.J , . CDCO
fiflss, IhI~lUk2Lr1IS_§hnZ[]hf"!'tiHe§, She. 2oik|“I1l£‘r’lrLr 7K7n:§i, §|'l|lQlm‘1nl,:6f!fp iljllwlw
I '.‘I u-\.l \.I'tlTJ‘ '. I
‘ T TT r1'\lx-ITTDTCJI1 ‘ 36. I 3? or-Egn- ea
i'I‘\IlI5TITTcli$T‘ minim: TIT: II 7:TCjls 9° 3,8’ l rl-ran=TT§TTE;iTsT‘ 4,3 ‘
rHiratsul<a l ‘ I r "_...
l I I 1 I ,
I
LT’ TT )r~i-- mg miii imam FniiTT'45T(T;;r;i Fm: :7 at ma:ri€TC.|r;TTTT JT‘ T TTTTT,iTn\ax- §;|;l T I, T TT pea
1l
I
\\Kamonomiya I
I I
I
TT
‘I Numazu
T
TTTTTT
TTT
)
I
I
‘
tiiists1 is
Tl Tr'r\l:i§7TGal:T Tinlnngb
-
T
Tf‘T'\IITI
"III
2 vie ls
TT
T To‘Gals
I
"181
Ii-TIT
5
5 T
Tl man the is-s@T
Timon; at3|: H
‘
T
I
T
F maTiT6TTTGars i\T\iTiTIT§TiTTBnls Tr|'~|i§fiTC§IsTTTTT”TTTTT
“
1)
L inn ~
i
TTCZJQTIT moi G
I‘
TTTTTTTTTI TTTT
“T is ‘mm
‘
T
Jl
,-
as es i-
l lwabuchi wL
, Yaizu
TT TI Fiilinrb Cal;
~
s s s TTT T T} n'uI=7!TTGihI 1?: 1
l
I T;
___ _L____ ___
manifi Gaul)
,
__:_
l
5
l
__
T
E
3 Q. 53
\
IT
Shin-Kikugawa
r Irsarr-T1t""c;r.“
if is ‘
i s r
ems»-r:'"c.r,‘": mr;.ra ca. *a.T.irrs;r.l
ii
so I
S
ca. It l T: r r----rs Gm p
T cm»--H Gals’
T
T T 1 "‘Tma=if§'t‘;5r;§” first\ rt»---no-car. y ~51 .r.t mu -- —- r —~ .~..m...t
E s
y , T mu
“ l, I I
Fig. 1. Differencein seismic waveform due to difference in earthquake and observation point
mD
I—4 .5 ‘F
fl1§.§I.§_-§.€2_i}.'ELlU.9.!!§lY_IQK,-EQJTQ;-.lI1§I]..§Q...I19.E..[$..I.9._lg9Pt.iTY II-O
"st Jr
°=I ,0- P\
Kamonlorniya substation of the Tokaido Shinkansen and T‘ 1
‘ h
‘<1. P. I.‘--= t>.____ ‘WT I
‘=1--I
Veo v rt .fl._ 6/ ‘Q
the Tabata substation of..the Tohoku Shinkansen. A \ F?*.
V yr. 8 A
velocity meter of specific period of 1 sec. equivalent was
7/HT?‘
used for the observation. spectrum discuss- /Fm
gilt T
the prevailing frequency of the surface layers. iFig. 4
shows the amplitude characteristic of incident waves to
8'5
surface layers estimated from b0l'iI"lg investigation and
kn
P8 velocltv logging The ml<1'0i£.?.m9.L..!tl1L*3Q-i..$..99D§.iQ§t.:
.m!ar.m.s.-aq--J. l ....._.__..-_._._l...........
fe uenc _(about 15 Hz of ‘/
surface la ers did not b,ec_om_e,_remar_l<a_b,le duringgthge
\@w4wwww:___. wee--- »___s.s__,_,_ -___ _______ _ ____ q_.,,,,,___:,,¢ _______.,_,_,_,____.;___
P U1
SHS
ude
m b——ll- time span when_?__t”he_ampli”t,u\d_e_" becomes smallest, but itm,_
L1
.._ __‘
_.__l_ m was ebsewed during 8 . re'.at.i!s!x.,.9.Pi.s£ .£i.£ns;..ses.0-,tr.9m..--
20100 P -m- t2.i.§§.i'-iI95?!Y...i.9.§.i.QQ.8.-
Four
erampt 3.2 ggasawarran at Tabata I
The surface layers. at this point are 18 m in thickness
0.05 Jr--~—~ - ~ ~ ' and sandy as 8 whole IIJ.?...I§I..\!.i=.i.I..l.!§..i..Q_§...§i§.QII1-Q.1.£t.mJ§_
0.1 0.2 0.5
- Frequency (Hz)
1.0 2.0 5.0 10.0 20.0 ..sLev.e.d....3..s.r1§...restsassas.ta9sal.Lv.-.as...ths-.dsr2tb_J.nc.rsasss
s.e£.£.§.e£b.§.§.a.!;<.>.es!;l.§9..ét,,!hs-d?.eIh_.0f..1.§-m~ Below this
level, the soil has an N value of 50 or more, with the
Fig. 3 Time change the horizontal spectrum of the shearing wave velocity at around 500 m/s.
microtremor Measurement of microtremor was made from the
night of June 24 (Thursday) to the morning of 26
(Friday), 1987. Tabata is located in a district of intense
10 _
I
T T T TTT T
i social activities and_f_l,_a_g@_Tr;1_§w%}th~ microtremors. Besides,
Karnonornry the measuring time PspanT’T‘ir\r%%T\one considered to be
5 i—III _ heavily laden with artificial tremors in the week. s
XIII I V! =5-"2 2 ! |lIr 1
ilI_III
-“_-n |lI||I| I
tamp
ude
10
I
it
iii
EA!-.=._ s s .: s IIi"l l _IlIl l -@552!!IIITI
i ihjppg
--In-5
‘ I_EIl l is-.-s.I|IuIu| :| nnrrir
i
i
V ' I
- Tabata: June 25, 1937 °* Horizontal
er?“ °°"'p°"°"t
component
-1r
Ii
IIHIIM
" 5 Illi- -s
U
T iTfT
-o
o.
-T- -i=0 T'_‘:~o ,0. +444-.4 +
(m10
kirn/s)
ne
3
___“ .-°T
T 1 ud 1 _-=o o=--2'1":
QT”
T E .,/.
‘I l I 1 i
ill,‘ , ‘I
l ‘
I l
0;.“-Q
--QT ""0-._ 1:0
¢".-oT
~ \ ~ o <T5Tt><>°‘.
E -
ll yampt
e
._. '5TT "x , ITT
IIIIIIr--r
sar- i: illlllT‘
Tl‘
_
-
IZ c" ashi =.4....: tr _ _ T‘ --o L44l
1-:-
cul- TTTT _ a 8 be ed;t
5I -I IE;InngT;To I
ii.
-n-n
Ampf
for
magn'
cat
onnc'dent'cfation I _III ZfllTilT-'l‘Bll A I::::=
Ileiiii
- .-
TATTTT
TI-.-g I‘Tun Ii -Ins“.:1 '"::-:.-':!:2:' —I‘- -~ I=iIlI,g
r:g::::i
-IIIIIkq.||| I
T inc!‘
1. -_ ‘U-u
Veoct I
5
i
0
I
s
I
12
I
re
I
24 30
.1
1 __
Fig. 5 Time change of microtremor amplitude I
0.1 0.2 0.5 1.0 2,0 5U to 5: @
I--I“pi OI
Frequency (Hz)
15"shows the time change of velocity amplitude.
Tabata is a place subject to substantial effect of the
Fig. 4 Amplitude amplification characteristics for train-induced tremor because the Tohoku Shinkansen,
incident seismic motion on surface layers at Tohoku Line, Keihin-tohoku Line. Yamanote Line, and
each point, which is estimated from results freight line run nearly. The velocity amplitude was read
- of boring and PS prospecting avoiding the train-induced tremor as much as possible.
5° |||| _ .rrr|T T
wave to the surface layers estimated from boring investi-
gation and PS velocity logging are shown in*Fig.,4.T+ -This
i- ,, I.%lI;gll|IIIl_l!!i1:;;:":::1::.:;
k
mne-s
lligrr iiililffl.Hie-=" —I.,.-_bait - . ._."‘=_ _*r:-=_.- 5
F3
- n-'ch.-=;'
T II
¢I'Ib
5-OTIII -- E_
III
3 00
ai-s-
-- I
- i T ' Iritri.
__ _ _ it
$52)":
5 _ qg‘i;
Four
S53
teramp
ude
I‘l
__ Q
*1
"I-‘I-Q
- ,Q—_ ,
:"
TTT
El1
....
-.
1-0
0 5...
,__
’ J;-§l\\!crri§r
’J?.'?-Ii)’-\'\VJ!‘... I,
4' .I/Ji\ -. it‘{'TIh: fs\$L'0Tfavlt III K
1* S=\1[l_!1I_}1-
I *n.\.\rwa rl. Q Ie-.z-s»*-._|I"_'-ra- '-"~-.
':3-TIT.’
""l!'lrl
r “Ii
3% int
t-4:r!-1.;."L:'-...9:*.."‘“?a=i‘gi ~;-=-:.':*____,'=-.—_:=I
0.05
an9-itg |T~ | '":.lll==
: : FiI=flIi:!
s':Ti-|:::Fi I- =13".
5"
-'1-T ‘.4 T="-lg
Frequency (Hz)
TT.5 TIT° lllll ‘"ITT|||..
IIIII_
fliflgg
Is»T‘TIIIII_.
Q-ERE : 552":
:2il%_.P 0.:’-=-7 E8.I‘-T- 1::
I9E-3
\--III,
Fig. 8 Comparison of tremor spectra between train
IMII - _ .-'1 ;-3"-=‘,_ -,.8-g.:7-._
.Iu‘ ‘
Four
S53
teramp
umkne-
de s
TT"'
'}-T1i-1-.'—1"|‘Tt“i-'Tp¢i4;:,T induced tremor and quiet time span
5-T'Z‘.L'\- ;-4-r~
'A-E.ZI Q -if-:'=_r-n|
;_I
"'lI'f". I".£;0;f;-
Ti%;_'i, _'T‘,:"--TT_: .@';:-r
(intermission of train operation and 3.00 a.m.)
0.1)--
' re-
‘‘I.i‘ll1i7,] I . E?-""‘
TTT='‘T-' .Li.*".';_.:"-.?'-_: -., -‘
TTT i IT IQ
I IOI, +1!_ ‘ Io 01 i'_-_-c.i t.h ¢li_»b
. -Qi1$—I l - 2
ft-.If_4!‘ IE" '€I‘t§'\"="U,'.-:.;'=¢I:-;.‘-*I"I-Iti;—q:t—-A-.—"T:D"vT“*'@
Ti-'iT-. i__:
=‘Gp-.*'"
E1"1: '-1."—'‘I“'9"' 1-;?_i$—‘rO
._Q
!:.''_?»:‘q;;_.-.:‘.~tl=_a¢1.-?—-I-In-Q'.--I"-‘-5.-:':-!'nQ.
-..fi‘|§I"‘'"l.-:|_,"-.'5-'~"=at.-“"'=_-=-‘.--"
—\=_r1;:=-."“.=-_ B . ca
TTT‘-‘TT'-T- -P-TTTT
O C. -'*
-4-
H» -~
14-
T‘ noise of microtremor and a method to eliminate the amplified so much through multi-reflection within
effect of Rayleigh wave is studied. surface layers of several ten meters at most in thickness.
‘Rayleigh wave, on the other hand, H ,,
' -» 4.1 Basic Concept rleipbears-remarkably in the vertical tremor. Accordingly,
if There are various research attempts, but there is no the degree of its effect. may be known by determining
established theory concerning what I<lI'ldS ' of wave )the’#1ia'tio").of-vertical tremor between the surface and
motions the microtremor is made up from. Namely,%-the is-suibstrarte. Namely, the effect of Rayleigh wave is nearly
microtremor can be considered to consist of various Zero when the ratio is approximately "1". With an
wave motions. (increasing ratio, ‘the effect of Rayleigh wave may
become more critical. Elirnination of the effect of
after r r rs rTrr r:Tr r ts TTI fiayleigh wave. isstudited by using this ratio.
)-
4)....-
I’
O
_l
1(-
I
s 4.2 New Transfer Function Estimation Method for
Surface Layers
Sf;-yof
surface layers is generally
I O
1
2fl_#__6 I O
I
C
OOIOO I
I
O
2r" O
0
r _-u ‘I73
"TM:
'1“
3?
nI"I\ .—-|‘u3IunII—'I|-it-nu‘ 4|-In P-lh
". Since th_eiTa.oi.f.ir;iai-._ooj§§.I.-.i.§...II19§i..LY_..--9.[9E§_9§i€€i
3 rock rock soft
,.Eta.rrl.e,i9.I1...waxe. -§'H.Si.,-of. .,m.i§=.rQ1tem0r, -..poss,i.bIv
be
/vert
c (rock .:-. softi Iii
arock
It III
mi
xtsoftra j
C'excoety
var-mart tremor is not amplifiedby the surface layers, the
Morokasubstaton
below should represent the effect of
Mex
C'ty
arof
coea
1-;
__-
I1
the vertical tremor:
I
M
arofea KotTokyo
arextsoft
eoaof
ra
en-
X ig, L-‘*1 -1
\T~..
e . .4 M" H,
Mex'ty
ntof
ercmoC
edatearea
-1.
HCLISTFD8 =4 1 LE5‘ will take a
nu-no vsruéi-’|argerrrrhan..‘51','*-.w,rrh increasing effect of Rayleigh
Od
riwave.
Mex
smcc
the
arof
¢ea enter Assuming that the effect of Rayleigh wave IS equal
<3 for vertical and horizontal components‘, ST/ES ITIBV be
Fig. 9 Ratio of maximum values between horizontal “I.
li".ii.'-*-'-..1-.
_ ‘,1 I
M 1-0 .. i I I1"
. .'n r"
ed that RS includes the effect to eliminate the effect of L‘; ti"
Rayleigh wave. t
f. . -'
VEIT \a_g»;f-:2 Hi ll
W
ti.II no i ll l];l;'tl._li
h -I
' ~
_ _§I __I
— . il'.'l
-fill‘.
I r |ll 1 ll
I
Iii.
1':-=
5.. “"- -an
l i rnlmi g
-2 I
5-'i 7 -:..~..:
' a:;. n. , ;\-IF:
SQ,
‘
5.0 W at ' **+‘*‘*‘"'*“
--- Kamonomiya l24-hOUf average)
*1 l frat“-* ._
!IIl:€ |
_. iii
. _ _ _ i
.
____ _
f _
it
l
Kamonimrya
I’
' 4.; i __l
rm 1 IIIIII Surhor
I zontfacea Q:= si ii
"';is
I
§ :@-.-Ie6-= 4-i es s:-=- -
‘In_ner.
>-
____--
i!-‘is.
'‘ 44_‘-‘I
5 ' HUcs‘ Li
—A ; _._ P1-B._ -M F4 4: \i5::
&-L
‘:.,_ 9“IIl
U‘ —QII
- __ ‘r0:
4;“AT___ ll
!‘°
4.,as . _ 4 Qln
y s.0 10.0 20.0
""Q ‘Ii’ I \\ iU r 1
pi .'1ll_I1—tI.l
3
_
\ I. ' - Frequency (Hz)
II?
' s'a'5'i-2'.¢IiI-'o'~l'.I'Jl
""
'
_
W H
__
llll
UH
Ill__
.,_~
'll'i!l'
Prll
_.__.
a0== "-I-\fli =. ; Fig. 11 ‘ Time change of horizontal/vertical spectrum
0-II
5- 52>
P U‘
’ *' ._.\l—* r__1___ _ :, "
1;’
5-s0=-‘i i: :i:§!;:: 1:5?-.
Fungi -'25’
i_hg_c:5;§:
I!§i;i‘-=._z': =-: ratio on the surface
‘l
I * *_ : r
l
___;i L _.__ _ . _ _ _ '1-;s1w,-=Q5
0.1 0.2 0.5 1.0 2.0 50 =5
"'- Q3: 8
=- @
"- . _,. ./
L Fig, 10. Spectrum. ratio of horizontal and vertical
. components in the substrate RE
P
(Microtremor: Kamonomiya, Tabata)
i l l ll i ll l‘
' RB should be f_reeg”_f_r%”n1W{?;éffect of Rayleigh wave and .1 ;_, L.’ —.~#. H V .--i"+‘:=- ,_~,_ Te ~ s . 4‘
“T
‘. l -w-»—
l
l i i ‘ it it “ .i
l y . 1 ii. y l\ p, . y 1
d
. §§@!!
': “_*“_ """ STT
130
_I'
“:0.
tr-_:;..!i3_°Ii
—I- ms.- .= : : -Rf
_
ilI-ll
1'“
sm“1*-£3ii:§fl_i—imilIlnimi=:'._:-srn un o I!iii!!-
!"lIl!.!_l|:r=w—-.9Q i ssi.=-55252
I_..J"'-z.-‘i
‘
*55;; "-1:
.-.-5 __4_ T Amp
'f'onmagn'
ccaton
at f F---
‘;-
.
I-' H°"Pg Emgz=-
aagezggn-' 1 0 2.0 5.0 10. Q i-*5 C3
‘f
f‘mp
cmagn
onaton
at L
§l AT I. -ii
.5. Frequency (Hz)
A §§
QEQIEIEEEE -ii III. I-I-It —-I !-i
N —II -_ EQEE1 -ISL: lllll /vi-‘c l" i"f'rr--»-E.‘ 1"
“~51 ||||1
‘U
.—
II tflII Fig. 15 Comparison between the horizontal/,,
0.1 0.2 0.5 1.0_ 2.0 5.0 10.0 20.0 K
vertical spectrum ratio (average) RS of
Frequency (Hzjfk AJ0‘l:°\i3‘-’-H‘!-. .i-i .-\fi,_'.'i.r.?»); train-induced tremor and intermission
l ii-{I o'1.»<€'E'L_$?/71-¥.?"*-*" /‘I/"""~"
at
tremor and the estimated transfer function
F lg. 13 Comparison of estimated transfer function 527' (_"__I_:gb____‘a_g)
(Ka_monomiy_a): RS (24-hour average) and
/Y zwiiira-\fir"‘é:'*-‘P-’i"'
S
TTR. p_tL~»<~Ln»_ic
s -
___ as
Maud
at
s
_ll%ll@_ST
_
'5CJ .:_ W7
ant i i ‘
W W W lil
- ._, . II.-‘I
==:=
1- :-I T . 5 .llil|
_(. Ililll. t
C ‘ii '**"“'”’
;
1-In
"if~"v mu l
Am
f
P
f'ccatmagn
at'onn
.
0_5
If.
‘:1‘,T T"IiIIISI
)-4!‘-=J5 : :L. § E§ i
II‘.
‘
$53:
“'
5i1.E:-".,I. . .
ii”; Amp
fcaton
magnfcation
ind
nu-
—IIIIfiI§VIl.I1_
IIIPJFIII-I
IlillllI
: r.; -' —:H.|!.|!.l: |'?.—-".5
-Ii-Ill!‘-{I
:g: :===:nIuI__'Ill'I_K
i1=:
.__F:-"—._T _
05 inrnnlllllnullnnn
0.1 0.2 0.5
Frequency (Hz)
1.0 2.0 5.0 10.0 20.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.0 2.0 5 b:_':::I
I;:g5z=:-.n=: n"3'nI u:|=
. =E§ § "“ €-=i'5 %:.-i|r.e-r="i_-
§g"'n-E‘£%Z$'§=: l"'_b
- ink-§!_5£§iH Q
Frequency (Hz)
Fig. 14 Comparison of estimated transfer function Fig. 16 Comparison of the estimated transfer
RS (24»hour average) and S17‘ function flshjbashgi) F, -,
"F')41.;§Yu,r_,__V_£W gv ' ?';);;_\mJg':{rf__ulh0y '"""' K '; '-E hi I oi rt‘/1 3.; i.
L-
O
C (")itv0)(r'€-titer’
8 i F V "T t ' Irror fir“ rt
---- R5 ----— S, EW component
- .1. -- ~+-i—ei-i-i-i-t---
CDAO point
0 ,,,
-L
0' i
o ‘ ;
4 .-l-
I1 H
-_-
A
'T
conat o .° 1
l
III 1
0 ..
I-in in
cu-
c ‘
\ .
n
magn'f I \
l l
.... 2 0- ' o -i
Qi l . O ie
--— l O O
l 0 -I
T _
CDAF point Ampf
cat
o » 0 oo siilvsxicsciifi‘
5 _ ‘ 0/ Along the Tokaido ‘e
/ L ShinkaT_nsen:_:T ~
i i
T
1101") ION 511- '
g r.
I
1 0 0 4 4 1 4 -- 1 I i
1
,__
OH
i
___
l
‘
‘ I
Q
I
I .
T if 41 0; ifs
gn'f'ca l ‘ I
Ho rizontal/vertical maximum value ratio AHS/A VS
f
mp
ca
seismic tremor on the surface
Fig. 18 Relationship between the horizontal/vertical
0.5 .
maximum value AHS/A VS and amplification
10 “Fm M magnification AT of tremor on the surface
SCT pOlflt
Inmj
_ ___ llllll stood at the seismic observation point if the seismic
"""'-2-"IlI (III tremor observation waveform of 3 components, 2
;; .:f'ca E _._
nil E I
horizontal components and vertical component, is
available.
‘I lt has generally been said that the microtremor iit;%E%E‘l$i 3
F Ii
-.
-—i-
-a-.1
-(restriction of the time span, thereby allowing measure-
Q1 ‘_-
_--—-§!
"_:'=I-n*iE".P-'~_-.—g._|-—i_1$_——--quasi-‘ --- (‘ ments within a short period at multiple points. This
nuu _-
§,1ipplie’men_‘(the J boring investigation results
Ill
Bi
I Ian.I I-..Il‘IQ-A=mi?T-n’-n—un:lIl|_._
1
P gn'f
"ii-fo‘r»‘j’prop§§z*i|nd /minute. ifiimation of the characteristics
/2
Amf
Ampf
A
fAmp
'¢a~;cat'Qc'oatn'on B OH H0'
"''5
llllll
ll
”‘ow-—
IlIlIEl-.1"-Il
I
"li
-|||‘“fl||||||l'"Il"i|~ | | l l
Eu.
III.
I | !
I -!—_ill!
§.
‘Q:
1_
u-§
_ Ii:-gI.5:Ii|-FJuIIIIl
= i'I5;_Iill!
| il-_"l|||
“iI=$l.Ba-1-IEl' !I‘
‘
I
IIIII I III_'
-I :iII
-
lHI f_-
III
ll
‘
K.a l< :|I $
-...-
I|'i5lE'Si"*E"?-F3»-?"5iigigg
i ! ~
“-”"i’|“-"i'0|I”l-"§“|‘§'”"~“§=§i;-E'5§~i!5'i| '|i' g_§5s:_asz:;=%|=:§:i i |iill
|iIfI| .|- | II||%
I'e=z-s=a-5*"
'_--_—!-
nuc- ulna?-a_|$1|IIII—=i
s~.@-_".-* - Ei"Si:nffEim§l§¥n:-Z:“~E:T.—"-" 5Il a=s-e_r."-,—.;:%.=_:5-. §_I .:z=.:
—n: : l
-erseie
ivalaeiozn
ayersiand itwis expected to demonstrate
collection of fundamental data for estimation
s==
U!
IitsIli gliIxarlmn-IIIIIJ!
'=q@‘lr=IIIIIin‘-=_n—2gIsIll.r"“:-;Qa1""..Ij|—‘$u-I".e=n--i|§.u5;:lI'\i"-|1oI.-=:5,=-3--_
.In9-.n_l"i-.3u—"nI1l-=.;‘nuim——_In'.ai-u—-a:_u5nt?-—|u1-_I n?2u-:_'~.4:-.|—l -Iliu‘m. ' !§ £1 .... ._.,
/. @ E H 5 I-\3 CD ‘U1 III C3 Q Q 5*" Ii 9'Q1.: 3::--- s==- 20.0 etaf i ledieairth quake damages.
' Q Frequency (Hz)
0 On the basis of above results, the dynamic seismic
Fig. 17 Comparison of the estimated transfer function. characteristics of the soil along an about 1500 km sec-
-. ,s"-1___:.- 2.-\' _.‘
using seismic waveform (Mexico City): tion of the Japan Railways (JR; formar Japanese
R5 and ST National Railways) line in the suburb of the metro-
“'‘\
J/$0 es-L-.3.-=;-?=r‘.*= ‘-’°‘ F-swam .. . politan district have been measured by using micro-
simulfgneous ‘observations in the ._g_rgund _ and on . thew»)
.7 tremor for four years from 1987. This isa part of the
surfaoe. Evidently, the maximumQelocjtjbamplification research project sponsored by the Ministry of Transport
magnification of surface layers can be estimated roughly, and involves measurements of microtremor at an interval
by using the maximum racéeilefatiojiratio of horizontalpwq of about 100 m along the line. In this project, measure-
and vertical Ktféflmvoifflong the surface although there exists ments were made at top and bottom of a structure in
a considerable variation. gm ,~~, order to understand the dynamic characteristics of the
X l Z) fie. {Q structure. The results will be reported as soon as
e.-cenelasiaas". F summarized.
Characteristics of s§__i§_nj_i__Q____’t[§_‘__!]1Q_[ and _rr]_ig;_r__ojtr_ern_gr
were reviewed and a new estimation method for Acknowledgment
dynamic characteristics of surface layers-was proposed. The seismic observation waveforms in Mexico City
This method is based on the assu motion that the ratio of were obtained by UNAM. The seismic observation data
horizontal and vertical spectra of surface tremor as an of the lzu Peninsula and Koto area of Tokyo Metro-
approximate transfer function. The validity of this politan were obtained by the Earthquake Research
method was proved by using microtremor observation lnstitute, University of Tokyo. The author would like
results at several points. lt was also shown that dynamic to express deep gratitude. He would also like to thank
characteristics of surface layers can be roughly under- Mr. Y- Watanabe of Fukuyama Consultants C0,, Ltd. for
this cooperation in measurement and analysis.
32 QR of RTRI , Vol. 30, No. 1, '89. Feb.
Reference ' Nakamura, Y. and Watanabe, Y.: Characteristics of
(1) Nakamura, Y. and Saito, A.: Estimation of the surface layers and seismic fault as observed in
acceleration amplification characteristics and seismic observation waveform (in Japanese),
maximum acceleration of surface lay.ers on the basis Proceedings of 19th Meeting for Earthquake
of strong earthquake motion records (in Japanese), Engineering Research, July 1987.
Proceedings of 17th Meeting for Earthquake Nakamura, Y.: A Method for Dynamic Character-
Engineering Research, July 1983. istics Estimation of Surface Layers using Micro-
(2) Nakamura, Y. and Ueno, M.: Attempt to estimate tremor on the Surface (in Japanese),.Railway
the dynamic characteristics of surface layers using Technical Research Institute Report, Vo. 2, No. 4,
vertical and horizontal components of the tremor April 1980 _
on the surface (in Japanese), Proceedings of 7th
Japan Earthquake Engineering Symposium,
December 1986.
o u u Q o o Q Q u o u Q a u u Q o - I o I o I o c q Q Q o n Q I Q o n u u Q u n Q Q Q u u Q u o n o o 0 I o o v c a Q u Q a n Q o o I u u u u u n Q Q u o no o o o I n I o o o Q . . . , . . . ' - ¢ q ¢ ¢ Q - Q Q Q Q Q I u Q Q u o o c o u I A a a I Io
unnu- - ¢ Q a n Q p o u a n a Q u u o o n Q u u Q Q I n o Q ¢ Q Q Q - ' q 4 . ' ' - Q - Q n Q Q Q a | q - Q q Q - - - q ¢ Q q ' q Q q ¢ q . ; . q. ' ‘ ' ' ' ' ' ' ‘ *
. I . Q | q Q Q Q o Q Q n I I I 4 o I o I I I I I O O G 1 I I I I I 0 Q o o n Q n I o Q I I I 0 I 0 0 I 0 I I 0 0 I n 0 Q Q o Q Q c Q I Q I o o Q Q no o u n - n - - ¢ - - Q - e ¢ - ¢ - a ¢ | 4 Q n - c e - a ¢ ¢ u u v n Q a o u o a o u Q u a Q u | ¢ o u a Q Q »| Q - a - a n ¢ e . u | o u a ¢ o I I n 0 o o I 0|
on
p o I o o Q 0 Q o Q c Q - I a o Q Q a o u o u 1 o Q o n 0 0 I r u Q Q o Q a - q q Q u u u Q u 1 q Q u v 0 q o Q Q Q ¢ Q Q Q u n Q Q Q u Q Q u q Q Q In o o o o n o u q u Q Q - Q a c Q u u 0 o n o Q e Q Q o n n u q Q ¢ u o q Q u o o u o Q o on
o o o a o Q I a Q o a u | u o Q I n Q o w o o n I I I I 0 I 0 I J 0 o u o u u u Q u I u o Q o Q Q Q 0 I Q Q n Q u u Q Q u u a a Q n I o Q u Q o 0 Q no ' . ' ' ' ' ' ' a o o 0 I o o \ I o o n o n o o o u u a I 0 U o Q I I o o Q u O o J Q IQ
o o Q o o I Q Q Q Q n a u u u o o J I 0 I 0 I ¢ Q I I Q 9 I i I I I I ¢ I Q 0 I o Q o n Q Q - u q u I u Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q q Q Q | q Q Q Q Q Q q Q Q ; an ' ' ‘ ' ‘ ' ' ' I Q 4 I Q o I o 0 Q Q o I Q Q o I o o o 0 o Q O o Q o G Q o o o I I l an
_ ._ . . ,,
Dimensions and Functions
'-A '.
1' >_- .- _;
~
Dimension 560mm(W) x 330mm(D) x
\ _ - 5
l95mm(H)
4-,-
U