Archer Bruce - Design As A Discipline
Archer Bruce - Design As A Discipline
Archer Bruce - Design As A Discipline
One of the prmclpal assumptions behind the launching of tlons by Bruce Archer The flrst is a short statement
th]s n e w journal zs that Design can be Identffzed as a sub]ect prepared speaally for thzs f~rst issue o f Destgn Studies by
m its own right, independent of the various areas m which Professor Archer, en tztled Whatever Became o f Design
zt *s apphed to practical effect The Ed, torzal Board zs Methodology P The second Is an extract from a lecture
therefore proposing to pubhsh a series o f papers by leading dehvered by Professor Archer at the Manchester Regional
members of the mternatlonal 'mv,s, ble college' of Design Centre for Sclence and Technology on 7 May 1976, under
Studies, whlch will a~m to estabhsh the theoretzcal bases for the t]tle The Three Rs. Thls latter paper argues not only
treating Design as a coherent dzsc~phne o f study m ~ts own that Deszgn should be regarded as a fundamental aspect o f
right educatzon (m no sense a spec]ahzed sublect) but that Deslgn
The questions or zssues that these papers are ~s (or should be) on a par with and distract from science and
expected to address include Can design be a d~sclpline zn zts the humanities
own r,ght ~ I f so, what are ]ts d~stmgulshmg features ~ (What Bruce Archer Is Professor o£ Design Research at the
are the kind o f features that d]stmgmsh any d~sc]plme ~) To Royal College o£ Art, London, where he ~s also Chairman o f
what questions should the dzsc~pline address ~tself - m both The Faculty o f Theoretical Studies, Head o f The Department
research and teaching ~ What methodology does zt use ~ What o f Deszgn Research and Head o f The Design Education Umt
results - what apphcatlons - should ]t be trying to achieve ~ He zs a member o f The Editorial Advzsory Board o f Design
To start the series we are pubhshmg two contrzbu- Studle£
Des=gn methodology =sahve and well, and hwng under the thinking and commumcatmg, and as powerful as scientific
name of Destgn research. and scholarly methods of enqu=ry, when apphed to its own
To tell the truth, I never did hke that hybr=d kinds of problems
expression 'design methodology' My object=on was not It is wtdely accepted, I think, that design problems
only to the corrupt etymology, but also to the tmpress=on, are characterized by being all-defined An all-defined
conveyed by the term, that the student of destgn methods problem ts one =n whmh the requtrements, as g=ven, do not
was exclusively concerned with procedure For my own contain suffm=ent mformatton to enable the desCgnerto
part, the mot=ve for my entering the field (25 years ago, arrive at a means of meeting those requtrements s0mply by
God help me) was essentmlly ends-directed, not means- transforming, reducing, opttm=zmg or super=mposmg the
or=ented I was concerned to find ways of ensuring that the given reformation alone Some of the necessary further
predominantly quahtatwe conslderat=ons such as comfort mformat~on may be discoverable stmply by searching for it,
and convemence, ethms and beauty, should be as carefully some may be generateable by exper=ment, some may turn
taken into account and as doggedly defenstble under attack out to be stat0stmally variable, some may be vague or
as predominantly quant~tattve cons0derat~onssuch as unrehable, some may ar=se from capricious fortune or
strength, cost and durablhty. Moreover, ~t ts demonstrable transitory preference and some may be actually unknowable
that the assumpt=ons upon whmh even the quantitative In adder=on,once known, some of the requtrements may
cons=derat=ons are based can never be wholly value-free, turn out to be mcompattble wtth one another As it happens,
and I wanted these assumpttons to be at least acknowledged most of the problems that most people face most of the
m the design process The study of methods was thus not t~me tn everyday hfe are all-defined problems ~n these terms
an end m =tself, and was certainly not motwated by the Not surprisingly, m the course of evolut0on, human beings
desire to ehmmate or down-grade the quahtat=ve considera- have found qu=te effectwe ways of dealing wtth them It is
tions, although a lot of people interpreted ~t that way these ways of behaving, deeply rooted in human nature, that
In retrospect, I can see that I wasted an awful lot he behind des0gn methods
of ttme =n trying to bend the methods of operational The first thing to recogmse Is that 'the problem' =n
research and management techmques to des=gn purposes. a design problem, hke any other all-defined problem, is not
The earher check-hst type models of the des=gn process, the statement of requirements Nor ~s 'the solution' the
such as that pubhshed m Design magazine ~n 1963-64 under means ultimately arrwed at to meet those requtrements
the tttle Systematic Methods for Designers turned out to be 'The problem' usobscurity about the requirements, the
very helpful to qu=te a lot of designers, and hardly a week practicabd=ty of enwsageable prows=ons and/or mtsflt
goes by even today wtthout my recetvtng a request for between the requ0rements and the prows=ons 'The
cop=es. It went out of print a decade ago The later solut=on' msa requ=rement/prows~on match that contains an
mathematmal and flow-chart type models, although ~n acceptably small amount of res=dual misfit and obscurity
many respects less normatwe, were never accepted by Thus the relattonshtp between design problem and design
working designers =n qutte the same way The reason, I requtrements and design provlston hes along one axts and
think, is that mathematmal or Iog=cal models, however the relationship between design problem and design
correctly they may descr=be the flextbd=ty, mteractweness solution hes along another axws The design actlwty is
and value-laden structure of the destgn process, are commutatwe, the des=gner's attent=on oscdlatmg between
themselves the product of an ahen mode of reasoning My the emerging requtrement =deasand the developing prows~on
present behef, formed over the past sex years, ~s that there
tdeas, as he ~llum=natesobscurity on both s=desand reduces
exists a destgnerly way of think=ng and commumcattng that m~sflt between them One of the features of the early
=s both d=fferent from sc~enttfic and scholarly ways of theortes of design methods that really d=senchanted many
18 DESIGN STUDIES
When Sir Wdham Curt=s, MP, coined the phrase 'The Three the material culture as outside h~s scope, although he would
Rs' m or about 1807, he placed an emphasis on literacy be prepared to bring a scientific philosophy to bear upon
which reflected the wrtual monopoly that the church then the study of the making and domg activities of other people
had in the running of schools I had an old great-aunt who Amongst scholars tn the Humamt~es there seems to
protested fiercely whenever the phrase 'The Three Rs' was be less agreement about the nature of their dlsc~phne, apart
mentioned She swore that Sir Wdham had got ~t all wrong from unammtty m the wew that ~t ~s qu~te d~stmct from
The Three Rs were Science. There ~s a fa0r consensus that the Humamtles are
especially concerned w~th human values and the expression
(1) Reading and wr~tmg
of the spirit of man. This justifies scholars m the Humamt~es
(2) Reckomng and flgurmg
in studying the history and philosophy of science, but not
(3) Wroughtmg and wrtghtmg
tn contributing to its content There also seems to be a
By wroughtmg she meant knowmg how thmgs are brought measure of agreement, by no means umversal, that the
about, which we m~ght now call technology By wr~ghtmg humamt~es exclude the making and domg aspects of the
she meant knowing how to do ~t, wh=ch we would now call fine, performmg and useful arts, although thmr hlstortcal,
craftsmanship From readmg and wr=tmg comes the idea cnt0cal and phdosophlcal aspects would stdl be fatr game
of hteracy, by which we generally mean more than Just the for the Humantt~es scholar It ts mterestmg to note that
abdity to read and write Bmng hterate means having the writers on the sc0ence stde frequently mention technology
abd=ty to understand, appreciate and value those ideas which and the useful arts as bemg excluded from themr purwew,
are expressed through the medium of words. From presumably because they are only just outstde the boundary
reckonmg and flgurmg comes the idea of numeracy Be=ng Wrtters on the humamt~es side frequently mention the free
numerate means bemg able to understand, appreciate and and performmg arts as bemg excluded, presumably because
value those tdeas that are expressed m the language of they, too, are only just outstde A third area in educatton
mathemat=cs It was from literacy that the rtch fabr=c of could therefore legitimately claim technology and the fine,
the Humamttes was woven. It was from numeracy that the performmg and useful arts, although not thmr sctent0fic
immense structure of Science was budt But what of knowledge base (if any) or their history, philosophy and
wroughtmg and wrlghtmg? It =s stgmflcant that modern crltictsm (if any), without treading on anyone else's grass.
English has no word, equivalent to literacy and numeracy,
meamng the abd~ty to understand, appremate and value THE NAMING OF T H E P A R T S
those =deas which are expressed through the medium of
Clearly, the ground thus left vacant by the spemflc clatms
makmg and domg. We have no word, equ=valent to Science
and the Humanmes, meamng the collected experience of of Sctence and the Humanittes extends beyond the bounds
of 'the material culture' wlthwhose pressmg problems we
the matertal culture Yet the output of the pract0cal arts
began The performmg arts are a case ~n pomt. There are
fills our museums and galler=es, equips our homes,
other areas, such as physical education, which have not
constructs our c~tles, constitutes our hab=tat been mentioned at all it would be temptmg to claim for
Anthropology and archeology, m seekmg to know
the third area tn education everythmg that the other two
and understand other cultures, set at least as much store by
have left out However, we should stick to our last, if I may
the art, buddmgs and artefacts of those cultures as they do
take my metaphor from the domg and makmg area, and
by their hterature and science. On the face of it, if the
clarify the questton of educatton tn the issues of the material
express=on of =deas through the medium of domg and
culture. Any subject which relates with man's material
making represents a distmct=ve facet of a culture, then the
culture must necessardy be anthropocentric A dtsciphne
transmtss~on of the collected experience of the domg and
makmg facet should represent a d=st=nct=ve area =n which clatms, as some kmds of smence do, to deal with
matters that would remam true whether man existed or
education
not, would be ruled out from our third area Material
culture comprises the ideas which govern the nature of
THE V A C A N T PLOT every sort of artefact produced, used and valued by man
Those ideas which take the form of sclenttflc knowledge
If there/s a th=rd area on educat0on, what d=stmgu=shes ~t would belong to Science The historical, philosophical and
from Sctence and the Humanlt0es~ What do Sc=ence and the critical tdeas would belong to the Humanities What 0s left
Humamties leave out~ It now seems generally agreed ~sthe artefacts themselves and the experience, sens~bdtty
amongst philosophers of science, that the dtst=nct0ve feature and sktll that goes mto thmr production and use. If the
of science =s not the subject matter to which the smentist human values, hopes and fears on which the express0on of
turns h~s attention, but the kind of intellectual procedure the sptr~t of man are based are shared w~th the Humamt~es,
that he brings to bear upon it Science ~s concerned w~th the striving towards them, and the mventweness that goes
the attain ment of understanding based upon observation, mto the production and use of artefacts, ~s a necessary
measurement, the formulat0on of theory and the testing of charactenst0c of our third area. Any d~sclphne falhng mto
theory by further observation or experiment. A sctent~st th~s area must therefore be asp0rat~onal tn character, and,
may study any phenomenon he chooses, but the kind of to take them clearly out of both the Science and the
understanding he may achieve will be hm=ted by the Humamt0es fields, it must be operat0onal, that ~sto say,
observat=ons he can make, the measures he can apply, the concerned wtth domg or making Under these tests, how do
theory avadable to h~m and the testab0hty of h=s findings the subjects ordmardy left out by the tradtt~onal Science/
Some sorts of phenomena may therefore be inappropriate I{mamttes dlws~on fare~ The fine arts, which m schools
for sctent~flc study, for the tome being or for ever. Some can be executed m a variety of materials such as ceramtcs
sorts of knowledge will be inaccessible to smence, for th~ and texttles as well as through the medium of pamtmg and
t=me be=ng or for ever Moreover, the scmnt~st =s concerned sculpture, clearly fall into the thtrd area In the useful arts,
w=th theory, that ~s, w=th generalizable knowledge. He is woodwork and metalwork would usually quahfy Technical
not necessarily competent or interested m the practical studies are sometimes conducted m such a way that they
apphcat=on of that knowledge, where social, econom=c, are not actually concerned wtth domg and makmg, and
aesthetic and other considerations for which he does not therefore may or may not rank as Sctence, mstead
possess any theory may need to be taken into account He S~mdarly enwronmental studies m~ght or m=ght not fall
would regard most of the making and doing actwities of mto the third area, according to their manner of treatment
20 DESIGN STUDIES