Citizenship Literacy Among 16-Year Old Secondary School Students in Malaysia
Citizenship Literacy Among 16-Year Old Secondary School Students in Malaysia
Citizenship Literacy Among 16-Year Old Secondary School Students in Malaysia
Students in Malaysia
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the citizenship literacy of second-
ary school students in Malaysia. Citizenship literacy was examined from two
perspectives, namely, the level of knowledge; and secondly, the perception of
selected aspects of citizenship. A questionnaire was developed to elicit the
response of the subjects. A total of 4,040 sixteen year old secondary school
students participated in the study. The Crammer’s V Correlation Coefficient
was used to analyze the relationship between citizenship literacy and the se-
lected variables. A similar analysis was conducted to determine the relation-
ship between the perceptions of the subjects and the variables.
Keywords
citizenship literacy, social justice, educational policy
1
Institute of Principalship Studies, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur
Corresponding Author:
Fatt Hee Tie, Level 2, Block C, UM City Campus, Jalan Tun Ismail, 50480 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Email: [email protected]
the convention, most of the provisions have yet to be fully realized. This is
attributed to the lack of awareness of the law affecting children and, in par-
ticular, adolescents. However, it is vital for adolescents to possess a suffi-
cient level of citizenship literacy to prevent any form of abuse of their rights.
Furthermore, an informed opinion of various aspects of citizenship such as
the law and government policy contributes to citizenship that is more
effective.
There is a need to maintain a minimum, necessary, right for students in
terms of the availability of legal provisions, protection, and encouragement
to participate in the affairs of the country in future. In this regard, the enact-
ment of certain laws and regulations has a national purpose such as the pro-
tection of a nation’s sovereignty. An example in Malaysia is the law making
it compulsory for all citizens to carry an identity card. The legislation enacted
this with the primary purpose of maintaining national security. On the other
hand, it is ironical that the centralization of education and the imposition of
national curricula have been deemed less likely to promote children’s partici-
pation rights (Franklin, 2002). In this context, the limitation may occur in the
Malaysian system of education due in part to the school curriculum, which
has in the past 5 years provided little emphasis to citizenship education. The
emergence of a new paradigm concerning the protection and maintenance of
the legal rights of adolescents is not likely to happen when the level of citi-
zenship literacy is inadequate.
The result of a decline in civic education in Malaysia during the 1980s to
1990s has serious implications in terms of the preparation of students for
future citizenship. The general assumption that students are well informed of
the law and aware of the current political situation may, therefore, be flawed.
In addition, there is a dearth of research on the citizenship literacy of 16-year-
old students in Malaysia. Although measures have been undertaken to rein-
troduce civic education into the curriculum and reverse the decline of civic
engagement, greater commitment is needed to promote compliance with vari-
ous legislations and enhance the level of literacy on citizenship. Certain mea-
sures must be taken to monitor and ensure that the Malaysian students are
well informed of the various rules and regulations that govern their daily life.
This is necessary as Malaysia has accepted the obligations and ratified the
provisions encapsulated in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of
the Child. The government’s decision to participate in this international ini-
tiative has led to an increase in interest and concern over student’s knowledge
on citizenship and civics from the perspective of the law, political status, and
social and welfare needs of the individual.
Review of Literature
Citizenship literacy or knowledge on civics and government is inextricably
linked to the state of citizenship and civic education. Cogan (2000) opined
that citizenship and civic education that are usually taught in the school his-
tory focus on developing knowledge of the function of the government and
other institutions, the rights and duties of citizens, and the development of
national identity. This was succinctly reported by McConnell, who, citing the
National Assessment of Educational Progress Report Card in Civics, revealed
that about 25% of students in the United States could achieve a proficiency in
their knowledge of civics and government. The result is worrisome as the
nation valued and cherished the ideals of democracy (McConnell, 2007).
In the United States, a study among 2,366 students who have completed
12th grade showed that the students were not prepared for effective citizen-
ship (Kahne, Middaugh, & Croddy, 2007). The findings showed that a high
percentage of the students reported that they intended to vote during an elec-
tion. However, they were less informed about the voting process. The
researchers also reported that about 50% of the students were not able to
identify the function of the Supreme Court and that there was limited com-
mitment to be politically involved. In addition, the U.S. Center for Civic
Education observed that there was a low voting rate among Americans, with
“widespread disengagement” and a “lackadaisical acceptance of their own
apathy and inertia” (Bahmueller, 1991). In a subsequent study, Peter Levine
(cited in Morin, 2002, p. 24) expressed that the
In addition, O’Brien and Kohlmeier (2003) also observed that 18- to 25-year-
olds demonstrated a low voter turnout and lack of participation in civic life.
In a study on school effects and civic knowledge in 27 countries, Fabrega-
Lacoa (2004) reported that the variability in civic knowledge that was attrib-
uted to the school was larger than that found in subjects such as mathematics
and science. Student background and experiences accounted for more of the
variability in civics achievement, compared to other school variables. In
addition, the results of the study showed that the less developed countries do
not have school effects larger than family background effects.
over young people’s lack of interest in civic involvement (Crace, 2000). This
was observed by Scott, who felt that “the well-rehearsed themes of youthful
innocence, ignorance, cynicism, and distrust are being blended discursively
to produce a new myth—that of ‘politically apathetic youth’” (p. 299). Scott’s
depiction of youth as “politically apathetic” arises from his observation that
some among the youth population perceived politicians and the protocol of
politics to be broadly irrelevant. This is demonstrated by the rise in apathy
among youth—a predictable response given the existing state (Scott, 2002).
Furthermore, this may be the reason why some adults vote less or not at all. He
noted that a significant number of children, like their parents, no longer live
within or experience a culture of clear party allegiance or voting. On the other
hand, Franklin (1986) disagreed with Scott when he succeeded in proving that
many children show an early interest in political affairs. Unfortunately, the
capacity for participation is limited. Education is vital in introducing youth to
democratic ideals that allow them to exercise their rights effectively in the
near future. It is important to develop an understanding of contemporary dem-
ocratic processes among youth to overcome the growing cynicism and distrust
in the political institution and process due to a lack of understanding in the
system of government. In addition, teachers in the United States, England, and
Hong Kong shared a strong consensus that civics education played a signifi-
cant role in the political development of students (Zaman, 2006).
In Malaysia, civics was an integral part of the curriculum in the 1960s and
1970s (Lim, 2007). The civics curriculum incorporated various elements of
citizenship, different aspects of national ideology, the federal constitution,
the government, and the political process. It provided students the content,
skills, and dispositions for democratic decision making in a multiethnic
society. However, in 1983, a new subject, “moral education,” replaced civics.
After 22 years, the Ministry of Education decided to introduce civics and
citizenship beginning in Year 4 at the primary school level and Form 1 at the
secondary school level in 2005. The subject is aimed at enhancing students’
awareness of their roles and responsibilities in society and the relationships
between the individual and society, family, culture, and the nation.
There is a paucity of research on what students actually know about demo-
cratic citizenship. Research on student’s citizenship literacy is essential
before developing and implementing educational reforms. In Asia, Heater
(2004) expressed that civic cohesion is essential for the proper functioning of
citizenship and nation-building. An enhanced citizenship education program
allows the development of informed, active, and loyal citizens that, in turn,
ensures the state’s survival amidst the global social, economic, and political
changes and minimizes civic lethargy.
Method
The study was conducted among a group of secondary school students aged
16 years. A total of 4,040 students participated in the study. A questionnaire
was designed to measure citizenship literacy in terms of knowledge and
understanding of some key principles related to citizenship in Malaysia. The
questionnaire consists of two parts: (1) the knowledge of the students on
selected aspects of citizenship, and (2) the perceptions of the students on
selected aspects of citizenship. Knowledge of citizenship was assessed in
terms of aspects on individual rights, the election process, and the legislative
process. Perceptions include opinions and views on aspects concerning free-
dom of the press, politics, and right to express opinions.
Findings
Students’ Citizenship Literacy
Item % n
Members of Parliament are immune from 77.4 3409
prosecution
A two-third majority is required to amend the 71.5 3149
constitution
It is an offence not to carry an identity card 53.0 2336
while outside the house
A Bill passed by Parliament must be approved 42.3 1865
by the King before it is enacted as law
Parliament consists of the upper and lower house 41.6 1830
Individuals aged eighteen have the right to vote 36.8 1619
The legal system provides equal treatment to all 28.2 1242
Elections in Malaysia are held every five years 27.2 1197
A juvenile aged below 18 can be tried in a 26.4 1162
criminal court
A guard in a building can retain the identity card 21.1 929
of visitors
The police can enter a house to search without 9.2 404
the permission of the court
were able to provide a correct response. The law states that no one has the
right to retain the identity card of another individual. Thus, the majority of the
participants did not respond correctly to this item. On the other hand, the
police can enter a house to conduct a search only after obtaining the permis-
sion from the court. Unfortunately, only 9.2% of the participants were able to
answer the item correctly.
Relationship χ2 V p χ2 V p χ2 V p χ2 V p
Immunity 6.74 .04 .01 32.67 .09 .00* 28.83 .08 .00* 12.81 .05 .00*
Amendment 63.59 .12 .00* 106.777 .16 .00* 62.36 .12 .00* 50.27 .11 .00*
Identity card outside 0.01 .00 .94 13.17 .06 .00* 9.88 .05 .01 9.28 .05 .01
Approval 0.03 .00 .88 59.89 .12 .00* 46.33 .10 .00* 10.80 .05 .01
Parliament 3.65 .03 .06 22.37 .07 .00* 18.35 .07 .00* 4.74 .03 .09
Right to vote 90.14 .14 .00* 17.35 .06 .00* 21.79 .07 .00* 9.01 .05 .01
Equal treatment 34.00 .09 .00* 22.59 .07 .00* 4.63 .03 .11 13.63 .06 .00*
Elections 17.34 .06 .00* 11.63 .05 .01 0.42 .01 .81 7.80 .04 .01
Criminal court 8.06 .04 .01 4.86 .03 .18 9.20 .05 .01 14.64 .06 .00*
Guard 15.81 .06 .00* 39.58 .09 .00* 20.06 .07 .00* 1.53 .02 .47
Police entry 13.41 .06 .00* 40.10 .09 .00* 4.44 .03 .10 8.62 .04 .02
Item % n
I will vote when eligible 89.5 3941
Students should undergo compulsory urine test for 88.5 3898
drug abuse
Measures to control youth from going out late at night 77.6 3417
are good
Youth that commit serious crime should be punished 68.9 3036
like adults
Legal system provide equal rights for women similar to men 67.7 2981
Youths do not have the opportunity to voice opinions 56.4 2486
Newspapers are free to report on any issues 55.4 2440
Trials for those who are guilty is a waste of time 49.3 2170
Politicians are not interested in issues concerning youth 41.9 1847
I am interested in taking part in politics 35.9 1580
The death penalty should be abolished 23.3 1025
address their needs. The findings also showed that 35.9% of the partici-
pants agreed that they were interested in taking part in politics. In response
to the item on abolition of the death penalty, about 23.3% agreed that it
should be abolished.
Relationship χ2 V p χ2 V p χ2 V p χ2 V p
Vote 4.86 .03 .03 32.86 .09 .00* 12.31 .05 .00* 6.15 .04 .03
Urine test 10.52 .05 .00* 3.34 .03 .34 4.21 .03 .13 16.03 .06 .00*
Late nights 101.19 .15 .00* 0.65 .01 .89 6.07 .04 .03 7.80 .04 .01
Punishment 0.12 .01 .73 17.95 .06 .00* 12.10 .05 .00* 4.80 .03 .09
Legal system 112.65 .16 .00* 33.98 .09 .00* 16.35 .06 .00* 21.57 .07 .00*
Opinions 4.27 .03 .04 53.65 .11 .00* 8.42 .04 .50 6.82 .04 .05
Newspapers 6.80 .04 .01 0.88 .01 .83 6.86 .04 .31 3.40 .03 .21
Trial 33.38 .09 .00* 3.73 .03 .29 4.07 .03 .12 2.50 .02 .29
Politicians 0 .00 .97 6.45 .04 .09 2.34 .04 .02 3.10 .03 .18
Interest 56.24 .11 .00* 26.91 .08 .00* 11.63 .05 .00* 1.85 .02 .40
Death penalty 61.61 .12 .00* 30.69 .08 .00* 16.11 .06 .00* 8.52 .04 .02
Discussion
Most of the participants responded correctly to the items related to citizen-
ship literacy. However, Malaysian youth, particularly those aged 16 years or
so, do not seem to have sufficient knowledge of the compulsory requirement
to carry one’s identity card while outside the house. The law mandates that
all citizens are required to carry their identity card for security reasons.
Educators need to ensure that students are taught on this specific aspect of
citizenship, as at present it is not covered in the syllabus. Parents usually
disseminate this information to their children. Similarly, literacy related to
constitutional amendment and parliamentary immunity appears to be at a low
level. This is probably due to a lack of exposure to the topic on the role of
the government and functions of parliament, as citizenship is not taught in
the school curriculum as a specific subject. Education policy makers should
provide more priority to and focus on citizenship literacy while planning the
curriculum, since voter turnout over the past 12 general elections was less
than 70%.
The male and female participants tend to differ significantly in their per-
ceptions toward the legal system. There was a significant relationship
between the items that state that the legal system provides equal treatment to
all irrespective of one’s racial background.
Generally, the responses of the participants with respect to perceptions
regarding citizenship seem to be positive, as most of them recorded an above-
average percentage in their perceptions. Most of the participants expressed
that they are willing to vote when they attain the eligible age. The result
seems to be encouraging, as political attitudes and behaviors of youth can be
a useful predictor toward adult civic participation (Miller & Kimmel, 1997
cited in Hahn, 1998).
Conclusion
In 1983, the Ministry of Education in Malaysia removed civics from the
school curriculum. However, after a lapse of 22 years, in 2005, the ministry
decided to reintroduce the subject into the school curriculum. The shift in
policy is significant, as the government recognized the vital contribution of
the subject in fostering national consciousness and democratic values among
its youth. Given the complex and multifarious nature of democratic partici-
pation, one needs to conduct further research before making policy and cur-
ricular recommendations related to the improvement of the citizenship
curriculum in school.
Schools play a vital role in helping students understand the fundamental
importance of active citizenship. It is important to ensure that students under-
stand the process of meaningful engagement as citizens since they are
bestowed certain legal rights and obligations by the state. The advent of
Internet technology has revolutionized citizenship and, consequently, posed
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or
publication of this article.
References
Advisory Group on Citizenship. (1998). Education for citizenship and the teaching of
democracy in schools. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
Bahmueller, C. (1991). Civitas: A framework for civic education. Calabasas, CA:
Center for Civic Education.
Birzea, C. (2000). Council for cultural cooperation: Project on education for demo-
cratic citizenship: Education for democratic citizenship a lifelong perspective.
Strasbourg, France: The Council of Europe.
Cairns, A. (1999). Introduction. In A. C. Cairns, J. C. Courtney, P. MacKinnon, H. J.
Michelman, & D. E. Smith (Eds.), Citizenship, diversity and pluralism: Canadian
and comparative perspectives (pp. 1-22). Montreal, Quebec, Canada: McGill-
Queens University Press.
Center for Civic Education. (1994). National standards for civics and government.
Calabasas, CA: Author.
Civics Expert Group. (1994). Whereas the people . . . civics and citizenship education.
Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Commission on Citizenship. (1990). Encouraging citizenship. London: HMSO.
Coogan, J. J., & Derricott, R. (Eds.). (2000). Citizenship for the 21 s t century: An
international perspective on education. London: Kogan Page.
Crace, J. (2000, February 15). The new citizens. Guardian Education, p. 2.
Fabrega-Lacoa, R. A. (2004). School effects and civic knowledge: A cross-national
study of youth political socialization. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertation &
Theses. (AAT 3242692). pqdweb? did=1273091271&sid=3&Fmt=2&dientld=39
54&RQT=309&Vname=PQD.
Franklin, B. (1986). The right of the child. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Franklin, B. (Ed.). (2002). The new handbook of children’s rights: Comparative pol-
icy and practice. New York: Routledge.
Gilbert, R. (1996). Identity, culture and environment: Education for citizenship for the
21st century. In J. Demaine & H. Entwistle (Eds.), Beyond communitarianism:
Citizenship, politics and education (pp. 42-63). New York: Macmillan.
Hahn, C. L. (1998). Becoming political: Comparative perspectives on citizenship edu-
cation. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Heater, D. (2004). A history of education for citizenship. London: Falmer.
Homana, G., & Barber, C. (2006, November). School climate for citizenship edu-
cation: A comparison of England and the United States. Paper presented at the
Second IEA International Research Conference. Retrieved January 3, 2010,
from http://www.iea.nl/fileadmin/user_upload/IRC2006/IEA_Program/CIVED/
Homana_Barber.pdf.
Kahne, J., Middaugh, E., & Croddy, M. (2007). The California survey of civic educa-
tion. Social Studies Review, 46(2), 10-15.
Kymlicka, W., & Norman, W. (2000). Citizenship in culturally diverse societies:
Issues, contexts, and concepts. In W. Kymlicka & W. Norman (Eds.), Citizenship
in diverse societies (pp. 1-44). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2005). Differing concepts of citizenship: Schools and communi-
ties as sites of civic development. In N. Noddings (Ed.), Educating citizens for
global awareness (p. 69). New York: Teachers College Press.
Lim, R. (2007, October 7). Much ado about morals. The Star.
McConnell, T. (2007). The civic mission of our nation’s schools. Social Studies
Review, 46(2), 6-10.
Miller, J. D., & Kimmel, L. (1997). The education of 21st century citizens: Cross-
ing the bridges to participation. Paper presented to the Social Science Education
Consortium, Asilomar, CA.
Morin, R. (2002, January 14-20). A record low-and no one’s cheering: A census sur-
vey shows that fewer young voters are going to the polls. The Washington Post
National Weekly Edition, p. 24.
Morrow, V. (2002). Children’s rights to public space: environment and curfews. In
B. Franklin (Ed.), The new handbook of children’s rights: Comparative policy and
practice (pp. 168-181). New York: Routledge.
National Curriculum Council. (1989). The national curriculum and whole curriculum
planning: Preliminary guidance (Circular Number 6). York, UK: Author.
Nelson, J., & Kerr, D. (2005). International review of curriculum and assessment
frameworks, active citizenship: Definitions, goals and practices, background
paper. Berkshire, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research.
O’Brien, J., & Kohlmeier, J. (2003). Leadership: Part of the civic mission of school?
The Social Studies, 94(4), 161.
Bios
Fatt Hee Tie is an associate professor at the University of Malaya in Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia. His research interests include education law, leadership, and school
governance.
Yan Piaw Chua is a senior lecturer at the University of Malaya in Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia. His area of research includes educational leadership, memory and thinking
skills, and creativity.