2017 Profits of Most Companies Missed Expectations: Slow and Below Expected Earnings Growth
2017 Profits of Most Companies Missed Expectations: Slow and Below Expected Earnings Growth
2017 Profits of Most Companies Missed Expectations: Slow and Below Expected Earnings Growth
The earnings performance of most companies in 2017 was below expectations Out of the 56
listed companies that we monitor, the majority (27 or 48.2%) performed below expectations.
Meanwhile, only a handful outperformed expectations at 9 or 16.1%. Moreover, based on listed
companies’ 2017 earnings results and 2018 guidance, the profit forecast of 21 companies is
expected to be revised downward while the profit forecast of only five companies is expected to
be revised upward.
The same sectors performed well relative to the first nine months of the year. Banks, gaming
and property companies delivered double digit earnings growth. However, despite the strong
profit growth of gaming companies, their performance was disappointing as they suffered from
a low hold rate during the fourth quarter of 2017. Meanwhile cement companies and consumer
companies continued to disappoint as cement companies suffered from weak selling prices and
higher costs while consumer companies suffered from higher costs.
Median 2017 earnings growth of listed companies that we monitor was quite slow at only 6.3%
as growth was pulled down by the power, telecom, media, cement and food manufacturing
sectors.
Note that median earnings growth of the power sector was only 2.1%, as it was dragged by EDC
and FGEN which booked non-recurring expenses. Meanwhile, the telecom sector’s earnings fell
by 19.1% due to the booking of one-off expenses and higher depreciation costs. Profits of media
companies fell by a median rate of 22.4% due to the absence of election spending in 2017. Profits
of cement companies fell significantly (-60.7%) as companies suffered from lower selling prices
and weaker margins brought about by increasing competition from local players and importers.
All food manufacturers registered weaker earnings in 2017 as they suffered from high input
costs. Some also suffered from intense competition.
On the other hand, the gaming sector posted the fastest earnings growth (median growth of
60.8%) driven by the turnaround of gaming revenues. The property sector posted a median
earnings growth of 13.6%. Finally, the banking sector registered a median earnings growth of
11.4%.
Disclaimer: All content provided in COL Reports are meant to be read in the COL Financial website. Accuracy and completeness of content cannot be guaranteed if reports are viewed outside of
the COL Financial website as these may be subject to tampering or unauthorized alterations.
STRATEGY I 2017 PROFITS OF MOST COMPANIES MISSED EXPECTATIONS
Profits of the nine banks that we monitor increased by a median rate of 11.4% in 2017. This was
largely driven by the strong growth of net interest income (+18%) as all banks reported double
digit growth in their lending portfolio and as net interest margins expanded. In 2017, median
loan growth reached 17.3% while net interest margins expanded by around 12 basis points.
Fee income also increased, although two out of the nine banks that we monitor reported lower
fee income on a year-on-year basis (UBP and RCB). Banks also booked lower provisions in 2017,
helping drive profit growth. Provisions fell by a median rate of 21%, as bank enjoyed low levels
of non-performing loans (NPL) and high levels of NPL cover.
Compared to our estimates, two banks (EW and PNB) performed better than expected.
Meanwhile, three banks (BDO, CHIB, and SECB) performed in line. On the other hand, three
banks (BPI, MBT, and UBP) performed below expectations.
Property companies registered an average net income growth of 15.9% in 2017 as both
residential and leasing businesses continued to grow. Combined revenues from residential
development and office units for sale increased by 13.6% to Php201.4 Bil, as companies
continued to increase completion of projects, allowing them to realize revenues from past
take up sales. Meanwhile, recurring income from property companies’ leasing businesses
(including offices, retail and hotel) grew by 12.5% to Php129.7 Bil as companies expanded
their leasing portfolio.
Demand for properties picked up during 2017, allowing property companies to grow their take
up sales by 19.2% to Php378.3 Bil. Property companies also increased their project launches
in 2017 by 54.4% to Php243.4 Bil to take advantage of the strong demand. Nevertheless,
inventory levels remain healthy as the value of launches is still less than the value of take up
sales.
All property companies registered higher y/y earnings in 2017. Compared to COL expectations,
ALI, SMPH, and VLL performed in line while MEG and FLI performed better than expected.
However, in terms of core operating results, only MEG outperformed expectations as FLI’s
outperformance was due to higher than expected interest and other income and lower than
expected interest expense and finance charges. Meanwhile, RLC performed below expectations
as it booked weaker real estate revenues.
Median earnings growth of consumer companies that we monitor slowed down further to
only 7.0% in 2017 from 8.5% in 9M17 as most food manufacturers reported lower earnings and
as most restaurants and retailers posted weaker margins during the fourth quarter.
Earnings of food manufacturers fell by a median rate of 17.2%. CNPF, EMP, PIP and URC suffered
from rising input costs and intense competition. Profits of all four companies fell in 2017.
Restaurants performed well, with median net income growth reaching 13.9%. However, the
growth pace was slower than the 15.6% increase registered during the first nine months of the
year as JFC and MAXS both suffered from weaker margins during the fourth quarter of the year
as a result of higher input costs.
Retailers delivered disappointing results. Although median profit growth reached 18.5% in
2017, all retailers except for SSI recorded below expected results as they suffered from weaker
margins during the fourth quarter due to higher than expected increase in operating expenses.
Among the nine companies that we monitor, four companies (CIC, JFC, PIZZA, and URC)
performed in line with expectations, one outperformed expectations (DNL) while four
underperformed (CNPF, EMP, PGOLD, and RRHI).
Median increase of power companies’ headline profits was only 2.1% in 2017, dragged by one
off expenses related to the termination of interest swap and debt prepayment by EDC and
FGEN and earthquake related expenses booked by EDC. However, median growth of core
profits was much faster at 8.1% driven by new power generation capacity (AP), and better
water availability of large hydro plants. This was partly offset by unplanned outages of coal
and geothermal plants.
Compared to estimates, earnings results of power companies were mixed. AP and FGEN
performed better than expected while MER performed in line with expectations. SCC’s profits
were weaker than expected as costs of its coal mining business were higher than expected.
The telecom sector’s recurring core net income in 2017 fell by 1% to Php35.8Bil. Profits fell
largely due to the 15.4% decline in GLO’s recurring core income as it suffered from a significant
increase in depreciation and finance cost. Meanwhile, TEL reported a 10.6% growth in recurring
core income as it benefited from a significant reduction in operating expenses. Although
recurring core net income was down slightly, EBITDA of both telcos was up as GLO benefited
from higher revenues while TEL benefited from lower cash operating expenses.
Combined service revenues of GLO and TEL were flat at Php279.1 Bil as strong growth in data
revenues (+13.5%) merely offset the steep drop in non-data revenues (-9.5%). On the positive
side, data revenue already accounted for 48.8% of telcos’ total revenues in 2017, up from 43.2%
in 2016. The growing share of data revenues should hopefully allow consolidated revenues to
grow at a faster pace going forward. In 2017, GLO’s revenues were up by 6.1% as data revenues
already accounted for 53.9% of total revenues. On the other hand, data revenues accounted
for 44.5% of TEL’s total revenues.
Both telcos suffered from a significant increase in depreciation expense as a results of higher
network infrastructure investments, pulling down profits despite higher EBITDA. In 2017, GLO’s
depreciation costs increased by 15% while TEL’s normalized depreciation costs grew by 13.3%.
Compared to estimates, GLO performed below expectations while TEL performed in line with
expectations. GLO performed below expectations due to the faster than expected decline
from non-data revenues and higher than expected increase in depreciation and financing
costs. Similar to GLO, TEL suffered from a faster than expected decline in non-data revenues.
However, unlike GLO, TEL’s lower than expected costs enabled it to completely offset the
impact of its lower than expected revenues on profits.
Profits of listed gaming companies increased by a median rate of 60.8% in 2017. This was
despite the entry of Okada Manila as the combined gross gaming revenue of all four integrated
resorts increased by 25.5% in 2017. Growth would have been faster if not for the drop in the
hold rate for both BLOOM and MRP in the fourth quarter of 2017. In 2017, gaming volume of
BLOOM, MRP and RWM increased by 16.0% to Php2,087 Bil. However, gross gaming revenue
or GGR increased by a slower pace of 14.0% to Php98.8 Bil. Consequently, despite the strong
growth in gaming companies’ profits, results were below expected. All three integrated resort
operators (BLOOM, MRP and RWM) performed below expectations.
Similar to the first nine months of the year, BLOOM and MRP continue to perform strongly while
RWM continued to suffer as a consequence of the June 2, 2017 shooting incident. In 2017,
gaming volume of BLOOM’s Solaire increased by 14.5% while gaming volume of MRP’s CoD
jumped by 66.6%. On the other hand, the gaming volume of RWM fell by 32.6% as a result of
lower gaming capacity and lower volume per gaming unit. Gaming volume was strong across
the board – from VIP tables, mass table to slots and ETGs. However, both BLOOM’s Solaire and
MRP’s CoD suffered from weaker hold rates in 4Q17 explaining their weaker than expected
performance.
Cement companies performed poorly in 2017, with profits falling by a median rate of 58.6%.
Profits fell mainly due to lower revenues and margins. Average selling prices (ASP) of cement
fell by around 10% based on our estimates. Note that ASP of cement has been declining
consistently since fourth quarter of 2016 due to intense competition from local manufacturers
and independent traders selling imported cement. Among the three listed cement companies,
only EAGLE was able to grow revenues (+12.0%) as growth in sales volume was able to offset
lower selling price. CHP and HLCM were already operating at full capacity limiting their ability
to grow sales volume.
Rising oil and coal prices towards the end of FY17 also negatively affected the earnings of
cement companies. Note that fuel and power account for ~49% of cost of sales. Coupled with
lower ASP, this in turn led to lower operating EBITDA margins, with CHP’s margin declining the
most (by 12.8 pp) followed by HLCM (by 11.1 pp) and lastly EAGLE (by 5.9 pp).
TEL PHILIPPINE LONG DISTANCE TEL In Line Down Down Weaker than expected revenues, higher than expected capex guidance
Power
Core income higher than forecast due to hydro plant's earnings, but not
AP ABOITIZ POWER CORP Above - -
likely sustainable
EDC ENERGY DEV CORP Below - - Core income in line with forecast
FGEN* FIRST GEN CORPORATION* Below - - Core income higher than forecast
MER MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY In LIne - -
Property
ALI AYALA LAND INC In Line - -
FLI FILINVEST LAND INC Above Down Down Slower real estate sales booking
MEG MEGAWORLD CORP Above Up Up Real estate gross profit was higher than expected
RLC ROBINSONS LAND Below - -
VLL VISTA LAND & LIFESCAPES In Line - -
SMPH SM PRIME HOLDINGS In Line - -
HOLD
Stocks that have a HOLD rating have either 1) attractive fundamentals but expensive valuations 2) attractive valuations but near-term earnings outlook might be poor
or vulnerable to numerous risks. Given the said factors, the share price of the stock may perform merely in line or underperform in the market in the next six to twelve
months.
SELL
We dislike both the valuations and fundamentals of stocks with a SELL rating. We expect the share price to underperform in the next six to12 months.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Securities recommended, offered or sold by COL Financial Group, Inc. are subject to investment risks, including the possible loss of the principal amount invested.
Although information has been obtained from and is based upon sources we believe to be reliable, we do not guarantee its accuracy and said information may be
incomplete or condensed. All opinions and estimates constitute the judgment of COL’s Equity Research Department as of the date of the report and are subject to change
without prior notice. This report is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security. COL Financial and/
or its employees not involved in the preparation of this report may have investments in securities of derivatives of the companies mentioned in this report and may trade
them in ways different from those discussed in this report.