Criticalissues13 PDF
Criticalissues13 PDF
Criticalissues13 PDF
Transportation
2013
transportation research board
2013 executive committee*
Chair: Deborah H. Butler, Executive Vice President, Planning, and CIO, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk, Virginia
Vice Chair: Kirk T. Steudle, Director, Michigan Department of Transportation, Lansing
Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board
Victoria A. Arroyo, Executive Director, Georgetown Climate Center, and Visiting Professor, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, D.C.
Scott E. Bennett, Director, Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, Little Rock
William A. V. Clark, Professor of Geography (emeritus) and Professor of Statistics (emeritus), Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles
James M. Crites, Executive Vice President of Operations, Dallas–Fort Worth International Airport, Texas
Malcolm Dougherty, Director, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento
John S. Halikowski, Director, Arizona Department of Transportation, Phoenix
Michael W. Hancock, Secretary, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, Frankfort
Susan Hanson, Distinguished University Professor Emerita, School of Geography, Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts
Steve Heminger, Executive Director, Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Oakland, California
Chris T. Hendrickson, Duquesne Light Professor of Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Jeffrey D. Holt, Managing Director, Bank of Montreal Capital Markets, and Chairman, Utah Transportation Commission, Huntsville, Utah
Gary P. LaGrange, President and CEO, Port of New Orleans, Louisiana
Michael P. Lewis, Director, Rhode Island Department of Transportation, Providence
Joan McDonald, Commissioner, New York State Department of Transportation, Albany
Donald A. Osterberg, Senior Vice President, Safety and Security, Schneider National, Inc., Green Bay, Wisconsin
Steve Palmer, Vice President of Transportation, Lowe’s Companies, Inc., Mooresville, North Carolina
Sandra Rosenbloom, Professor, University of Texas, Austin (Past Chair, 2012)
Henry G. (Gerry) Schwartz, Jr., Chairman (retired), Jacobs/Sverdrup Civil, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri
Kumares C. Sinha, Olson Distinguished Professor of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
Daniel Sperling, Professor of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science and Policy; Director, Institute of Transportation Studies; University of California, Davis
Gary C. Thomas, President and Executive Director, Dallas Area Rapid Transit, Dallas, Texas
Paul Trombino III, Director, Iowa Department of Transportation, Ames
Phillip A. Washington, General Manager, Regional Transportation District, Denver, Colorado
Rebecca M. Brewster, President and COO, American Transportation Research Institute, Marietta, Georgia (ex officio)
Anne S. Ferro, Administrator, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio)
John T. Gray II, Senior Vice President, Policy and Economics, Association of American Railroads, Washington, D.C. (ex officio)
Michael P. Huerta, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio)
Paul N. Jaenichen, Sr., Acting Administrator, Maritime Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio)
Michael P. Melaniphy, President and CEO, American Public Transportation Association, Washington, D.C. (ex officio)
Victor M. Mendez, Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio)
Robert J. Papp (Adm., U.S. Coast Guard), Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (ex officio)
Lucy Phillips Priddy, Research Civil Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, Mississippi, and Chair, TRB Young Members Council (ex officio)
Cynthia L. Quarterman, Administrator, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio)
Peter M. Rogoff, Administrator, Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio)
Craig A. Rutland, U.S. Air Force Pavement Engineer, Air Force Civil Engineer Center, Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida (ex officio)
David L. Strickland, Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio)
Joseph C. Szabo, Administrator, Federal Railroad Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio)
Polly Trottenberg, Under Secretary for Policy, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio)
Robert L. Van Antwerp (Lt. General, U.S. Army), Chief of Engineers and Commanding General, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, D.C. (ex officio)
Barry R. Wallerstein, Executive Officer, South Coast Air Quality Management District, Diamond Bar, California (ex officio)
Gregory D. Winfree, Administrator, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio)
Frederick G. (Bud) Wright, Executive Director, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C. (ex officio)
T
he United States depends on transpor- deaths and injuries from crashes, demand
tation to compete globally and to help for imported petroleum, and the release of
revive a sluggish domestic economy. greenhouse gas emissions and other forms of
Individuals depend on transportation pollution.
not only to get to work but to shop, socialize,
and access health care, among other goals focusing on research
(1). For all of its benefits to the nation and
individuals, however, transportation imposes The Executive Committee of the Transporta-
large costs—lost time in traffic congestion, tion Research Board (TRB) has compiled a list
of critical issues in transportation for 2013 to
stimulate awareness and debate and to focus
research on the most pressing transportation
issues facing the nation:
sources
Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS). Pocket Guide to Transportation. U.S. Department of
Transportation, 2012, Tables 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 4-6.
BTS. National Transportation Statistics, Table 1-51, www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/
files/publications/national_transportation_statistics/index.html. Accessed May 25, 2013.
Census Transportation Planning Products, Chapter 4. www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/census_issues/
ctpp/data_products/journey_to_work/jtw4.cfm. Accessed May 20, 2013.
National Bicycling and Walking Study. U.S. Department of Transportation, 2010. http://katana.
hsrc.unc.edu/cms/downloads/15-year_report.pdf. Accessed July 12, 2013.
example, whether to raise federal taxes or to goods shipped by truck, which account for
rely on the states or to fund intercity high- three-quarters of the value of domestic goods
speed passenger rail. States are shouldering shipped.
greater responsibility for funding, but whether In the 2012 legislation reauthorizing federal
they can—or should—without substantial highway and transit programs, Congress
federal support is part of the debate. moved toward measuring the performance
Continued uncertainty about the direction and increasing the accountability of recipients
of federal policy and about funding shortfalls of funds. Meaningful performance measures,
underscores the importance of research. The however, are difficult to define and imple-
discovery and adoption of new solutions to the ment. Many of the intended outcomes, such
critical issues can help address the daunting as improving safety and accessibility, are
challenges ahead. affected by far more than infrastructure capac-
ity. Moreover, agencies do not collect the data
critical issues 2013 required to measure other outcomes, such
as system reliability or travel times in peak
System performance is neither reliable periods. A major effort is required to define
nor resilient. appropriate performance measures; to develop
Transportation systems operate at capacity for consistent, valid indicators; and to support
substantial periods of the day. Unanticipated data collection (5, 6).
events, such as crashes or inclement and ex- Competition between modes and shortages
treme weather, can greatly disrupt traffic and of funding are forcing all modes to operate
intensify congestion and delays. Motorists and more efficiently; this challenge, however, par-
motor carriers on metropolitan area high- ticularly affects public infrastructure agencies,
ways and travelers on intercity planes, trains, which lack the necessary resources (7). Agen-
and buses experience delays more routinely, cies that were established to build systems are
because expansion of the system has slowed only slowly adapting to the need to operate
despite the continuing growth in the popula- the systems efficiently. Because the indi-
tion and in the economy. vidual modes of transportation are organized,
In many major metropolitan areas, motor- funded, and managed independently, optimiz-
ists who must arrive at their destinations on ing system performance to take advantage of
time must allow 60 minutes for trips that the relative strengths of each mode is difficult.
take only 20 minutes in lighter traffic (4). Research and policy analysis can guide agen- www.trb.org/Publications/Blurbs/
The delays to motor carriers raise the cost of cies and Congress in making good decisions 164998.aspx
12
6
Industry
3
Residential
Utilities
0
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
www.trb.org/Publications/Blurbs/ Freight Repercussions by truck and rail. The drilling of new oil wells
169153.aspx The changing energy supply is also affecting requires transport of heavy equipment, frack-
freight services. The increased regulation of ing sands, and other supplies to rural loca-
emissions at coal-burning utilities, coupled tions, which may have inadequate roads and
with low natural gas prices from an abundant bridges for the heavy traffic. Despite growth
domestic supply, has contributed to natural in domestic production, the pipeline transpor-
gas displacing coal as the baseload fuel for tation of diluted bitumen from Canada’s oil
generating electricity in many parts of the sands region is in high demand at U.S. refiner-
country. This is a positive change from a ies, stoking public concerns about continued
climate perspective but has affected railroads’ dependence on fossil fuels and about the risks
traffic mix and revenues. Increased demand of spills.
for coal exports may partly offset the reduced
demand for coal transportation to domestic Development Patterns
utilities but introduces other controversy over Motor vehicle use has rapidly expanded in
coal dust and the impacts of new export termi- the United States in recent decades, resulting
nals in environmentally sensitive areas. in large increases in transportation energy
Geographic shifts in oil and gas supply, demand. The nation’s large land area has con-
often in areas not well served by pipelines, tributed to the increased travel. But develop-
leads to the greatly expanded transport of oil ment in the United States, compared with that
in most other heavily populated industrialized
nations, has spread population at a low density
per square mile. The blessing of abundant land
becomes a curse in terms of energy consump-
tion and vehicle emissions.
The United States consumes far more
energy per capita than other developed
countries do—approximately twice as much
as the European nations in the Organisation
for Economic Co-operation and Development
(17). Total automobile travel per capita in the
United States is three times that of Japan and
nearly twice that of Germany and the United
Kingdom (18), in part because origins and tions. The effects of the Great Recession on
destinations in the United States are spaced these changes, however, are unclear. A deeper
farther apart. In addition, the United States understanding is needed of people’s choices
has not invested as heavily as other developed and how they change in response to the econ-
nations in public transportation and has not omy, lifestyle preferences, the use of informa-
placed constraints on patterns of develop- tion technologies and social media to replace
ment. Not surprisingly, more Americans have travel and to provide more efficient travel op-
chosen travel by automobile than comparable tions, the aging of the baby boom generation,
travelers in other industrial countries. and immigration. This knowledge could help
Concerns about sustainability, personal localities improve planning for transportation
physical activity, health, and livability have re- services, infrastructure, and policies.
newed debates about the form and density of One of the biggest environmental success
development and about transportation’s role. stories in the United States is cleaner air,
In response to changing preferences for urban partly the result of cleaner-burning engines
lifestyles, many jurisdictions are changing and fuels. More improvements are expected
policies to allow for denser development that from tighter emissions standards for transpor-
supports greater reliance on transit, cycling, tation vehicles and fuel economy standards
and walking. This has stimulated interest in for highway vehicles. Nonetheless, 123 million
reorienting autocentric places, as well as a people—more than one-third of the U.S.
vigorous debate about how much the strate- population—live in areas that do not meet
gies would reduce automobile demand and federal standards for ozone (20), resulting in
associated emissions (19). respiratory and other health effects that likely
contribute to premature deaths (21).
Other Effects
Total U.S. travel per capita appears to have lev- Funding sources for public infrastructure
eled off, and the youngest driving-age cohorts are inadequate.
appear to have different driving and lifestyle In the past century or more, the nation has
www.trb.org/Publications/Blurbs/
preferences from those of previous genera- invested in a massive transportation system 162093.aspx
1
Unless Congress acts to change expenditure levels 2
Many general opinion polls show majority opposition to
or taxes, the trust fund will have fewer receipts than fuel tax increases, but the answers depend on how the
expenditures in 2015, continuing a trend of the past questions are framed. For example, one research project
several years. Moreover, if Congress chooses not to found that the majority supported increases under certain
transfer monies from the general fund in 2015—projected conditions, such as when the revenues are specifically
at $15 billion in 2015, compared with $6 billion in 2013— dedicated to improving maintenance. See A. W. Agrawal
the trust fund would not be able to support any new and H. Nixon, What Do Americans Really Think About
obligation of federal funding in 2015, because any cash on Federal Tax Options to Support Public Transit, Highways, and
hand would be required to liquidate previous obligations. Local Streets and Roads? Results from Year 4 of a National
This would result effectively in a cut of approximately Survey, Mineta Transportation Institute, 2013. http://
$50 billion in federal aid in that year. See K. P. Cawley, transweb.sjsu.edu/PDFs/research/1228-American-tax-
Testimony: Status of the Highway Trust Fund, Congressional poll-2013-public-transit-highways-streets-roads.pdf.
Budget Office, July 23, 2013. Accessed July 12, 2013.
www.trb.org/Publications/Blurbs/
156647.aspx
7/2012
8-hour Ozone
Classification
Extreme
Severe 15
Serious
Moderate
Nonattainment areas are indicated by color. Marginal
When only a portion of a county is shown in
color, it indicates that only that part of the
county is within a nonattainment area boundary.
Aviation
The demand for air travel has increased stead-
ily but slowly since the Great Recession began.
With capacity flat—or slightly declining—the
number of passengers per flight has increased,
and profitability has improved for many U.S.
airlines, although marginally. Freight Railroads Fuel tax revenues have declined
steadily, even as infrastructure
At the same time, however, collections to Major freight railroads are privately owned
demands continue to grow.
the aviation trust fund that supports the oper- and make extensive capital investments to
ating and capital costs of air traffic control and sustain their systems; recent capital invest-
airport capital assistance have not kept pace ments have reached record levels (28).
with costs; as a result, transfers from the gen- Federal policies that affect capital allocation
eral fund have increased. Uncertainty about can divert these private investments from
the federal government’s willingness to pay essential needs. For example, a federal regula-
as much as 25 to 40 percent of annual federal tion requires freight railroads to invest in
aviation agency budgets for operations from train control technologies that would avoid
the general fund (27) threatens the level of air train-to-train collisions and that would allow
traffic services offered, the modernization of passenger trains to mix safely on track shared
the air traffic control system, and capital grants with freight trains, including those carrying
to fund infrastructure renewal and expansion toxic inhalation hazards. Compliance involves
at airports. large costs and significant technical hurdles
for freight railroads (29). Meanwhile, the
Airplanes line up for takeoff. Federal funds for air traffic control and airport capital assistance face an www.trb.org/Publications/Blurbs/
uncertain future. 165823.aspx
0.08%
0.07%
0.06%
0.05%
0.04%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
61 64 67 70 73 76 79 82 85 88 91 94 97 00 03 06 09 12
19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 20 20
systems and technologies face controversy over demand-responsive transit—that could play
the sharing of the expense between the private a large role in improving passenger transport
and public sectors and uncertain federal fund- efficiency, serving those without access to cars,
ing (27). Safety regulators are hard-pressed to and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
ensure that new safety technologies will work Nevertheless, innovations are being
as intended (12). The new required systems introduced and implemented. Electronic
to avoid train crashes on shared track must stability control technology is saving lives
overcome daunting technical challenges. Major by reducing motor vehicle rollover crashes
public-sector investments in information (34). Electronic toll passes are increasingly
and communications technologies have yet interchangeable across multiple toll collec-
to produce the dramatic changes in mobil- tion systems. Real-time data on traffic and
ity services—such as dynamic ridesharing or parking are being delivered to mobile devices
www.TRB.org