1

CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION......................................................................2
I. GENERAL PHENOMENA OF MODERNISM.................3
I.1 THE AMBIVALENT NATURE OF KNOWLEDGE......................4
I.2 INTERIOR VERSUS EXTERIOR..............................................4
I.3 FRAGMENTATION................................................................6
I.4 TIME, SPACE AND TECHNOLOGY........................................8
II. JOSEPH CONRAD – A MODERNIST WRITER...........9
II.1 KNOWLEDGE AND THINKING.............................................9
II.2 INTERIOR VERSUS EXTERIOR...........................................11
II.3 FRAGMENTATION..............................................................12
II.5 TIME, SPACE AND TECHNOLOGY.....................................14
III. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION.................................16
BIBLIOGRAPHY...................................................................18
 2

Introduction

This paper will focus on modernist fiction and Joseph Conrad. The main question
that should be answered is why Conrad is considered to be a typical modernist writer.
In order to deal with this subject efficiently it has first to be made clear what
modernism exactly is. This will be the first part of the analysis and it should give a
precise pattern and contain features that can be used to be exemplified on Conrad’s
texts in the second part. Conrad, therefore, will be picked out as a central theme in
the second part only. Part 1 should, furthermore, include aspects that make clear what
marks this literary epoch in contrast to earlier and later trends in literature. The
second part of the paper consists of the argumentation that these features can actually
be found in Joseph Conrad’s texts. The novels which will stand in the centre of
interest are The Secret Agent (1906), Heart of Darkness (1898/99) and Lord Jim
(1899/1900). The stress of the analysis will lie on The Secret Agent. The third part,
finally, should sum up the main ideas.
 3

I. General phenomena of Modernism

Modernism is a term used in the western hemisphere to describe not only a literary
epoch in the first decades of the twentieth century but also to refer to a more general
idea. Modern means a contrast to traditional methods and established rules and
regulations, particularly in art, architecture and religion. However, the term itself has
been more often used in a retrospective sense since the 1960’s than in everyday
speech at the time. “The roots of the change in the novel lie tangled deep in the
modern experience. Causes in the fields other than literature there doubtless were – a
confluence of psychological, philosophical, scientific, social, economic, and political
causes, analogues, and explanations”1

Many features of modernist literature can be found in earlier works. An

accumulating process of certain characteristics finally resulted in what today is
labelled as modernist writing. As always in creative innovations exterior influences
helped to shape the form and content of the new style. At the beginning of the
twentieth century technical development changed the outlook of the people, as the
pace of living suddenly became faster. The German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche
pointed out the connection between technology and art. Technology also changed the
print medium. Mass production led to a reduction in book prices which led to an
increase in literacy. Nevertheless, it was a time of social polarization. The gap
between the rich and the poor grew larger constantly.
The effects of technological advances had a strong impact on the human psyche:
loss of individual value resulted in fear. Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalysis greatly
influenced the writers of that time, and his discoveries found their way into
modernist literature. While nineteenth century literature was mostly concerned with
sociological matters, modernist fiction often focused on the psychological
phenomena of the individual. James Joyce was one of the innovators of this
technique using the stream of consciousness. After Joyce used this technique in
Ulysses (1922), many writers tried to give this method a new twist. Probably the
most interesting variant can be found in William Faulkner’s The Sound and the Fury
(1929), in which the reader is confronted with the point of view of a mentally
handicaped character. Time and space seem to be rescinded in this chapter of
Faulkner’s novel.
1
Alan Friedman, cited in: Randall Stevenson, Modernist Fiction (London, 1998) vii
 4

I.1 The ambivalent Nature of Knowledge

It was a widespread belief in society that science would change the world for the
better. The belief in the sciences and technology reaches its climax in Nietzsche’s
statement Gott ist tot (God is dead). Everything seemed to be possible in the not too
distant future. The artist faced a dilemma, since he was by nature located outside this
scientific arena. What happened in result conveys the impression of a logical
consequence: language and literature were investigated with academic methods. The
Swiss linguist Ferdinand De Saussure had a powerful effect on the linguistic
concepts that existed prior to his Cours de linguistique générale (1915), making
them obsolete. He was the first to understand language as a system of mere values.
His works influenced the development of Russian Formalists and Structuralists.
Claude Lévi-Strauss and Roland Barthes founded their works on De Saussure’s
fundamentally new ideas. The effect on the writers was, if not as strong as on the
literary theorists, nonetheless present. Knowledge, thereby, became a theme in
modern literature. Severe changes, a shift of paradigm, took place in the first two
decades of this century, giving literature a new, more academic, appearance.
At the same time, however, it became obvious that science could not explain
everything (cf. Heisenberg’s Unschärfetheorie). Knowledge, therefore, was always
seen as something that had to be questioned. It was this ambivalent relation between
accepting and questioning knowledge that gave modern literature a unique
characteristic.

I.2 Interior versus Exterior

This feature of modernist writing is closely linked to Sigmund Freud. Freud’s

psychoanalysis changed the view of understanding human behaviour. According to
Freud to comprehend the characteristics of a person one had to take the subconscious
into account. This theory is sharply reflected in modernist literature. Elizabeth Dew
explains that modern novelists found “the older technique too clumsy for their
purposes” because of an “engrossing interest” in “conscious and deliberate
psychology”2. One possible technique of investigating the subconscious of characters

2
Elizabeth Drew, cited in: Randall Stevenson, Modernist Fiction (London, 1998) 65
 5

is to describe their dreams. Freud began to publish The Interpretation of Dreams in

the late 1890’s and his works were quickly translated into English. German speaking
novelists such as Stefan Zweig (cf. eg. Verwirrung der Gefühle, Der Amokläufer) and
Arthur Schnitzler (cf. eg. Fräulein Else, Traumnovelle) were among the first to put
Freud’s ideas into stories, giving their characters traits that could easily be
interpreted with the help of Freud’s theories. Thereby the credibility of literary
characters increased immensely, at least from the scientific point of view, giving
them a completely new dimension.
In terms of literary techniques it can be seen that interior and exterior are often
contrasted in a novel. At first external appearances are described and then the focus
shifts to the feelings, emotions and problems of the character. One means for
describing a character’s interior is, of course, Joyce’s stream of consciousness.
Cinema arguably contributed more than any other medium to the significant change
in literature. The montage technique used by Griffith (Birth of a Nation) and
Eisenstein (Battleship Potemkin) connected for the first time different narrative
strands and may have influenced the structure of some modernist novels. Cinema
may also explain the tendency towards the internal. No literary style, not even the
Naturalist, can create images that are as precise as cinematographic pictures
throughout the length of a novel. “Concentration within inner consciousness ... may
reflect a recognition that film could be more effective than written narrative in
recording external reality.”3
The conflict in a novel was not necessarily bound to exterior influences anymore.
Conflict could arise internally. In nineteenth century literature inner conflict was
often caused by external circumstances. In Gaskell’s North and South, for example,
problems surface when a family decides to move away from their home, in the
Sherlock Holmes detective stories a crime is usually the engine of the story, and in
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein the creation of “the wretch” initiates conflict. Modern
civilization, for which the individual was not crucial, led to a retreat into the self.
Accordingly, the term “conflict” must be modified. It is no longer the “conflict” but
the “self-conflict” that seems to be in the centre of interest.

The Modernist discourse about selfhood owed considerably to the

psychoanalytical movement, as has already been evidenced. With

3
Randall Stevenson, Modernist Fiction (London, 1998) 133
 6

respect to the problems of self-deception and self-conflict, the new

perceptions of psychoanalysis were highly relevant. Whatever the
developing struggles of emphasis within the Freudian group, their
theory and practice clung tenaciously to the key of notions of the
Unconscious, repression and the work of censorship. Phantasy,
projection, introjection and all manner of defence mechanisms were
accepted as basic functions of the self. Man, the neurotic animal, was
thus seen as condemned to self-conflict at the very heart of his
intentions and motives – a confused state which only therapy could
begin to unravel.4

I.3 Fragmentation

World War I created the images that lead to fear of fragmentation.Words such as
“torn into pieces”, “fall apart”, “break down”, “disintegrate”, “shock” and
“fragmentation” all found their direct combat meaning.5

To die from a bullet seems to be nothing; parts of our being remain

intact; but to be dismembered, torn into pieces, reduced to pulp, this is
a fear that flesh cannot support and which is fundamentally the great
suffering of the bombardment.6

Violence is thematized in modernist fiction more openly than ever before, on the one
hand to shock the reader and on the other to reflect inner conflicts to the outside. It
becomes a metaphor for the state of the soul.
Fragmentation is not only restricted to the story itself but can also be mirrored in the
form, structure and style of the novel. Franz Kafka’s Der Prozeß (The Trial), for
example, is an unfinished fragment. The correct chronology of the chapters remains
a controversial issue. Furthermore, fragmentation is a means of demonstrating to the
reader that life and meaning cannot be grasped in total, hence every possible
narrative is incomplete by nature. Modernist writers were the first to stress this
insight by deliberately giving the reader fragmented novels. “If narrative purpose,

4
Dennis Brown, The Modernist Self in Twentieth-Century English Literature (Hampshire, 1989) 109
5
cf. ibid., page 43
6
unknown cited in: ibid., page 43
 7

coherence, rationality are founded on and speak the notion of integral selfhood, then
vagueness, indirection and ambigious symbolisation express awareness of self-
fragmentation.”7. Metaphorically, fragmentation stands for universal breakdown.
Four examples for breakdown in modernist narrative are8:

a) The breakdown of language. A language-crisis is obvious if the use of dialogue in

Victorian and modernist novels is compared. While in nineteenth century
literature spoken language was used by the characters to influence, convince and
argue (cf. North and South), in modernist fiction usually only short sentences of
dialogue are used. Again, this goes hand in hand with the tendency to look
inwards. Moreover, it is often the case that language is misunderstood or
misinterpreted by the recipient (character and reader).

b) The breakdown of signs. Signs loose their meaning. This is, of course, closely
connected to the breakdown of language for language is a system of signs. But
also religious signs, and other symbols change their meaning or become
difficult to interpret.

c) The breakdown of the self. Based on Freud’s psychoanalysis an individual can

no longer be understood as one unity. He differentiates between Ego, Superego
and Id, thereby fragmenting the self.

d) The breakdown of time. “Modernist fiction rarely abandons the story altogether,
or smashes up the clock entirely, but it does resist as far as possible the
arrangement of ‘events in their time sequence’” 9. This typical feature can be
evident in the composition of chapters, which do not follow the chronological
order (cf. eg. The Sound and the Fury).10

I.4 Time, Space and Technology

7
Dennis Brown, The Modernist Self in Twentieth-Century English Literature (Hampshire, 1989) 28
8
Textual examples are given in II.3
9
Randall Stevenson, Modernist Fiction (London, 1998) 87
10
This device is also often used in film: cf. Once Upon A Time In America (1984) or Pulp Fiction
(1993)
 8

Not only the breakdown of time’s chronology but the clock itself as symbol for
time and technology can frequently be detected in all forms of modernism. In the
film Modern Times (1936), for example, Charlie Chaplin is trapped by intricate
cogs and wheels of industrial machinery as if he were being mangled by the
workings of a monstrous clock.11 Chaplin provides us with an image of the kind of
servitude people felt towards time. The clock as instrument was perfected in the
beginning of the twentieth century and while its mechanical ingenuity and precision
was celebrated, at the same time many people felt a sense of unease.

Consciously or unconsciously aware of the increasing peril of ‘great

and perfect systems’, of ‘rules, laws and formulae’ in an increasingly
complex late industrial age, modernist writing likewise drops the
clock. Moving away from serial chronology, it recreates in a past
recovered memory, in streams of consciousness, or in time in the mind
otherwise established ... some of the organic continuity that had been
divided, subdivided and sliced out of contemporary public life.12

Nevertheless, time as represented in fiction cannot generally be viewed as negative.

The modernist writers were seeking to place the main action inside a character,
memory can function as a neutral zone in which past, present and (an imagined)
future collide. Time and space are unbound in this territory, offering the writer new
possibilities of creating interesting and unknown situations.
“For modernist novelists, memory becomes an essential structuring device in the
creation of a ‘time in the mind’ able to move - through the randomness of
recollection - away from ‘mechanical succession’ and the oppressive control of the
clock.”13
While the characters of the novels became much more passive in modernist
literature, inanimate objects (mostly technological devices) became particularly
active. The clock, for example, moves in a regular, seemingly unstoppable, rhythm.
Animation of objects has been a literary technique for a long time. In modernist
writing, however, it becomes established through the opposing passiveness of the
living.

11
cf. Randall Stevenson, Modernist Fiction (London, 1998) 127
12
ibid., pages 127-128
13
ibid., page 96
 9

II. Joseph Conrad – A Modernist Writer

Considering the dates in which the three novels (The Secret Agent (1906), Heart of
Darkness (1898/99) and Lord Jim (1899/1900)) were written it becomes clear that
Joseph Conrad was definitely ahead of his time.

’...on or about December, 1910, human character changed’1. Thus

intoned Virginia Woolf. She was referring specifically to the first
English showing of postimpressionist French painting but had in
mind revolutions occurring at that time not only in all the arts but also
in the ways man thinks of his universe, his social organizations, and
himself14

Conrad was a pioneer, as sailor and author. His new techniques not only influenced
but helped initiating the next generation of writers. What exactly are his literary
techniques?

II.1 Knowledge and Thinking

In The Secret Agent knowledge is problematized in so far as there is no single

person who knows everything. Each character has a limited knowledge of what is
happening to and around him. Mr. Verloc, for example, is convinced that his wife
loves him ‘for himself’. In truth, however, she married him for economic reasons and
because he treats her imbecilic brother mildly. Winnie Verloc is not told by her
husband of his contrivances dealing with her brother, she only finds out at the end of
her life.
Stevie, Winnie’s brother, is used by Verloc as if he were an instrument. One can
assume that Stevie does not know what he is actually doing at the zero meridian. The
lack of knowledge in Stevie lets him live by his instincts, which tell him the
difference between right and wrong. Interestingly, he is probably the most likeable
character in the novel, perhaps because his knowledge is so reduced. “Stevie's breast
heave[s]”15 when the cab driver whips the horse. His simple but decent words “Bad

14
Alan Warren Friedman, Forms of Modern British Fiction (Austin, 1975) 3
15
Joseph Conrad, The Secret Agent (Oxford, 1998) 157
 10

world for poor people”16 are more truthful than the words of any other character in
the novel.
Even the reader has no total understanding of the action for a long time, because
the fragmented nature of the text does not allow for a complete picture of the plot
until the end of the novel. Many events occur not only in absence of the characters
but also of the reader. By breaking down the chronological cohesion Conrad is
questioning knowledge the notion of knowledge as absolute.

In Heart of Darkness Marlow is driven by an indefinable urge towards Kurtz,

hoping to broaden his understanding by meeting him. The last five pages of the novel
contain the word “to know” thirteen times only used in direct reference to Kurtz (eg.
“I alone know how to mourn for him” 17; “But you have heard him! You know!” she
cried. ‘“Yes, I know”18; “>I knew it – I was sure!< ... She knew it. She was sure.19).

The eponymous hero of Lord Jim is liable to be in most error when he feels that he
knows what to think:

This is demonstrated early in the conclusion he draws from his first

missed opportunity. When there is a chance to rescue survivors of a
collision, Jim appears paralysed by the storm and fails to join other
training-ship boys in the rescue cutter. As soon as the cutter returns,
successful, his whole attitude changes: ‘The tumult and the menace of
wind and sea now appeared very contemptible.’ 19 The reconstitution of
Jim’s sense of his romantic heroism is ironically accompanied by
descriptions of his ontological recovery: ‘Now he knew what to think
of it ... He exulted with fresh ceritude’. 20 Knowing ‘what to think of it’
is in Conrad the mark of a self-deceived simpleton20.

II.2 Interior versus Exterior

16
ibid., page 171
17
Joseph Conrad, Heart of Darkness (London, 1995) 119
18
ibid., page 121
19
ibid., page 123
20
cf. Dennis Brown, The Modernist Self in Twentieth-Century English Literature (Hampshire, 1989)
119
 11

The Secret Agent is based on actual events. In the year 1894 a bomb exploded in
Greenwich Park killing the anarchist sympathizer who was carrying it. The Times
described the deceased as “a young man of about 30, supposed to be a foreigner. The
only evidence of identification was a card bearing the name ‘Bourbon’” 21. The fact
that Conrad uses a real life event for the telling of a story can be viewed as an
attempt to widen the frame of reality, thereby giving the reader a direct connection to
the novel. The outside world of the reader collides with his own interior. In this way
Conrad goes beyond the border of pure fiction.

Many examples of this trait of modernist literature can be found in The Secret
Agent. Every character in the novel seems to have to suffer from a disharmony
between the outside world and the self.
Chief Inspector Heat’s strong sense of integrity, for example, is not directed inwards
but outwards. He would like to be seen as the honourable and decent man that he is
not:

“ ... he did not like the work he had to do now. He felt himself
dependent on too many subordinates and too many masters.
The near presence of that strange emotional phenomenon
called public opinion weighed upon his spirits, and alarmed
him by its irrational nature. No doubt that from ignorance he
exaggerated to himself its power for good and evil--especially
for evil; and the rough east winds of the English spring (which
agreed with his wife) augmented his general mistrust of men's
motives and of the efficiency of their organization. The futility
of office work especially appalled him on those days so trying
to his sensitive liver.”22

Mr. Verloc is quite similar to Chief Inspector Heat in this aspect. He prefers to hold
information from his wife and Stevie but it does not bother him – he thinks that he
acts in a perfect manner by doing so.

21
The Times (London), Feb. 16, 1894. This quotation is taken from: Eloise Hay, The Political Novels
of Joseph Conrad (Chicago, 1981) 221
22
Joseph Conrad, The Secret Agent (Oxford, 1998) 99-100
 12

Winnie’s interest in marrying Verloc can be seen as another example of a

discrepancy between the internal and external world.
The Professor is the only exception in this context 23. He wants to purify the human
race by eliminating the weak. He would rather kill himself than being caught. In
contrast to his weakly physical description he is supremely self-confident. His sense
of power derives from the bomb he always carries with him. Like most characters in
the novel he has problems in interpersonal relations. In a way he resembles
Shakespeare’s Richard III and Schiller’s Franz Moor who use their resources
(intelligence and cunning) to take revenge on the world and to feel powerful. Like
the Professor they are ugly. However, both Richard and Franz justify their deeds with
their ugliness, while the Professor substantiates his with pseudo-ideology.

Heart of Darkness also problematizes the opposition between interior and exterior.
References, and sometimes comparisons, to the inside and outside worlds can be
found throughout the novel. Internal emptiness is described as something shocking:
“Perhaps there was nothing within him. Such a suspicion made one pause - ...” 24.
Conrad transforms the classic adventure narrative into “an exploration of tormented
inner space”25. Emptiness of the inner self, incarnated by the station manager who is
visited by Marlow, gives the reader the impression of being even more gruesome
than characters who appear passive on the outside.
Kurtz is described to Marlow as “The Chief of the Inner Station” 26. The title itself
insinuates inner richness. Marlow’s trip to Kurtz is a trip to the Inner Station, a trip
into the self.

23
Stevie, who only lives his instincts, cannot be included in this group of characters for he simply
lacks the ability to differentiate between those two spheres.
24
Joseph Conrad, Heart of Darkness (London, 1995) 42
25
Dennis Brown, The Modernist Self in Twentieth-Century English Literature (Hampshire, 1989) 17
26
Joseph Conrad, Heart of Darkness (London, 1995) 47
 13

II.3 Fragmentation

The Secret Agent contains different aspects of fragmentation. In order to

differentiate between the different kinds of fragmentation the table given in I.3 will
be used.

a) The breakdown of language can be observed at different points in the novel. Most
obvious is the lack of communication between Mr. Verloc and his family. There
are relatively few dialogues in The Secret Agent and they demonstrate the
inability to communicate, the degeneration of communication.

b) The breakdown of signs.  is Verloc’s designation as agent. In chapter IX “the

skirts of his heavy overcoat [are] hanging in a triangle on each side of the
chair”27. A triangle occurs additionally in connection with the ‘darkness’ and
‘solitude’ of Brett Street where “few lamps defin[e] its triangular shape” 28. This
shape is especially emphasized when Winnie tries to escape after she murders
Verloc. Originally, the triangle is a symbol for the Trinity in Christianity,
representing the union of Father, Son and the Holy Spirit as one God. Stevie’s
circles are also Christian symbols. Conrad uses the term ‘cosmic chaos’ to
describe Stevie’s drawing. A circle represents eternity, with no beginning and no
end. Here, however, both geometrical figures are taken out of their Christian
context. The exactness of the triangle and the chaos of Stevie’s circles are
contrasting. It is difficult, though, to make a religious interpretation of the novel.
The signs have lost their traditional meaning.

c) The breakdown of the self. In The Secret Agent the characters seem to be
subordinate to the plot. Human instances give the impression of ineffectiveness.
They are often not portrayed as animate beings but rather as objects. Verloc is
often described in that sense: “Mr. Verloc obeyed woodenly, stone-eyed, and like
an automaton whose face had been painted red. And this resemblance to a
mechanical figure went so far that he had an automaton’s absurd air of being

27
Joseph Conrad, The Secret Agent (Oxford, 1998) 183
28
ibid., page 273
 14

aware of the machinery inside him.” 29 Because of his mechanical self, Verloc
loses emotional dimension.
Heart of Darkness is seen by critics as “an attempt to dissolve the very concept of
the integral self: ‘he was hollow at the core’ (p.83). The hollowness is no mere
vacuum, but rather a central chaos where conflicting desires, intentions and
conceptions whirl about in a dark vortex. We have the spectacle in Kurtz of
supreme ‘egotism’ in the absence of any coherent ego.”30

d) The breakdown of time. On the one hand The Secret Agent is fragmented in its
chronology making it difficult for the reader to understand. He has to put together
the pieces of the puzzle. On the other hand the novel is full of traditional literary
techniques. In the first three chapters the narrative is clear and chronological
(with a long flashback in chapter I), then it breaks after the bomb outrage and is
reassembled with difficulty, like Stevie’s body. It reflects a chaotic universe in
which the Greenwich Observatory acts as centre of the world (and of the book),
trying to give sense and order to it. The Greenwich meridian has to do with time,
which is often denied by the narrative structure of the novel. However,
structure and literary techniques are present on a subtle level. For example, the
novel is framed by two similar situations: a man walking down the street. At the
beginning it is Verloc on his way to the foreign Embassy, who is as it seems alone
in the streets. At the end it is the Professor who “passe[s] on unsuspected and
deadly, like a pest in the street full of men.” 31. This framing creates unity and
contrasts the fragmented nature in which the story unfolds. Other techniques
used by Conrad for the same reason are foreshadowing (cf. Stevie’s playing with
fireworks at the very beginning) and repetition (the relationship between Winnie
and Stevie is reinforced through sentences like “She could not bear to see the boy
hurt. It maddened her.”32, which can be found throughout the novel).

29
Joseph Conrad, The Secret Agent (Oxford, 1998) 197
30
Dennis Brown, The Modernist Self in Twentieth-Century English Literature (Hampshire, 1989) 22
31
Joseph Conrad, The Secret Agent (Oxford, 1998) 311
32
ibid., page 38
 15

II.4 Time, Space and Technology

Modernist novels often rise above the concept of absolute time. As already
mentioned, the Greenwich Observatory, which is the symbol of time, not only
functions as target for the anarchists but also as centre of the book. It may be seen as
the central symbol of the novel. The attempt to blow up Greenwich Observatory is a
symbolic attempt to annihilate time itself.
Greenwich Observatory is symbolically significant because it is a place of science
and rationalism. The act of destruction must be irrational to be truly terrifying. The
contrast between rationality and irrationality is also reflected in the opposing
symbols of  and Greenwich Observatory on the one hand and Stevie’s circles on
the other. Conrad uses contrasting symbols and archetypes such as light and
darkness, crowds and emptiness. They often stand in connection with one recurring
theme: alienation, which can be found principally in the relationship between the city
(London) and its citizens. This is particularly apparent in the Commisioner’s journey
in chapter VII.
Some characters in The Secret Agent express their hostility towards clocks. Winnie,
for example, “cared nothing for time” 33 after she murdered Verloc. Winnie, at first,
mistakes the ticking sound of Verloc’s blood dripping on the floor for the sound of a
clock. Time and death are directly linked at this moment. Four pages later Conrad
writes:

This time she managed to refasten her veil. With her face as if
masked, all black from head to foot except for some flowers in her
hat, she looked up mechanically at the clock. She thought it must
have stopped. She could not believe that only two minutes had passed
since she had looked at it last. Of course not. It had been stopped all
the time. As a matter of fact, only three minutes had elapsed from the
moment she had drawn the first deep, easy breath after the blow, to
this moment when Mrs Verloc formed the resolution to drown herself
in the Thames. But Mrs Verloc could not believe that. She seemed to
have heard or read that clocks and watches always stopped at the
moment of murder for the undoing of the murderer. She did not care.

33
Joseph Conrad, The Secret Agent (London, 1998) 264
 16

"To the bridge--and over I go.". . . But her movements were slow.34

Time is passing very slowly in these moments for both Winnie and the reader. Even
the stopping of time is suggested here, which is exactly what the anarchists wanted
and what modernist writing tries to accomplish: “temporal autonomy”35.

In Lord Jim Captain Brierly is given a kind of gold chronometer as a reward. In this
case the measurement of time is celebrated. It is an example of worthwhile human
achievement; nevertheless, it is an instrument that allows “to regulate with minute
precision the movements of workers or machines”36.

C.B. Cox points out the confrontational nature of characters and inanimate objects
in the novel. While the characters seem to lack energy, objects become peculiarly
active. The automated piano in the restaurant, whose “keys sank and rose
mysteriously”37, the city of London that appears like a beast with an appetite for
people, the door bell of Verloc’s shop which “is hopelessly cracked, but ‘at the
slightest provocation, it clattered behind the customer with impudent virulence’” 38,
an armchair that seems to bite The Assistant Commisioner’s elbows, Winnie’s
defective gas-burners that whistles ‘as if astonished’ and purrs comfortably like a cat
and Verloc’s hat which seems to live on even after Verloc died. Hats “often act as
symbols of identity”39 in Conrad’s fiction.40

34
Joseph Conrad, The Secret Agent (London, 1998) 268-269
35
cf. Randall Stevenson, Modernist Fiction (London, 1998) 128
36
Randall Stevenson, Modernist Fiction (London, 1998) 127
37
Joseph Conrad, The Secret Agent (London, 1998) 67
38
C.B. Cox, Joseph Conrad: The Modern Imagination (London, 1974) 84
39
C.B. Cox, Joseph Conrad: The Modern Imagination (London, 1974) 85
40
A symbol that tends to get used in this context up till today in contemporary film such as Miller’s
Crossing (1990), directed by Joel Coen.
 17

III. Summary and Conclusion

The aim of this paper is to exemplify features of modernist fiction in Conrad’s

novels. Therefore, the major characteristics of this epoch were defined at first and
then demonstrated on textual basis. This structuralist method was chosen for reasons
of clarity.
Modernist fiction can be defined as a literary epoch characterized by breaking with
traditional methods, such as innovation in point of view (stream of consciousness
technique), dissolving of the self, fragmentation and breakdown of various narrative
traits, which accounts for the loss of the cause-effect relation. Symbols, signs and
language change or lose their meaning. Time becomes both a symbol of progress and
of enslavement. Conrad, who wrote the novels that were being discussed before the
actual period of modernism “was announced”, included all these issues in his works.
Accordingly, he had the impact of a pioneer and is consequently seen as one of the
most typical modernist writers.
The differences between modernist fiction and the fiction of the nineteenth century,
and especially the Victorian novel, are plentiful.
The difference to postmodernist fiction can be considered to be not that drastic,
since the modernist features are still being used, only in a modified way, making it
even more difficult for the reader to follow the plot.

In conclusion, it is safe to assume that modernism was the most influential period
of writing in the twentieth century. Ulysses, first published in 1922, contains certain
traits of modernist writing, although it is problematic to label it as a modernist book.
It was recently announced by Time magazine to be the ‘best book’ written in the
twentieth century. Even though the term “best” is not very concrete if referred to
literature, it once again underlines the importance of that era.
The term ‘modern’ is still being used to describe phenomena that appear to be new.
In that sense the period of modernism is not finished yet, it has just changed its face.
Needless to say, that modernist fiction as it was discussed ceased to be written in that
form by the second half of the century at latest. However, the impact can still be
recognized today.
 18

Bibliography

Brown, Dennis. The Modernist Self in Twentieth-Century English Literature: A

Study of Self-Fragmentation. Hampshire & London: The Macmillan Press
Ltd., 1989.

Cadeddu, Manuel. Two Modernist novels: The Secret Agent by Joseph Conrad and A
Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man by James Joyce. Essay for an English
Tutorial at the University College Dublin. Winter Term 1999.

Collins, Lucy & Holdridge, Jeff. The Aesthetics of Politics in Modernism. Notes
from a 12 week Lecture held at the University College Dublin. Winter Term
1999.

Conrad, Joseph. Heart of Darkness. London: Penguin Books, 1995.

Conrad, Joseph. Lord Jim. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.

Conrad, Joseph. The Secret Agent. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

Cox, C.B. Joseph Conrad: The Modern Imagination. London: J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd.,
1974.

Friedman, Alan Warren. Forms of Modern British Fiction. Austin: University of

Texas Press, 1975.

Hay, Eloise Knapp. The Political Novels of Joseph Conrad – A Critical Study.
Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1981.

Klarer, Mario. Einführung in die anglistisch-amerikanistische Literaturwissenschaft.

Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft Darmstadt, 1995.