2002 Rules KR10

The Karnataka Determination of Seniority of the Government Servants
Promoted on the basis of Reservation (to the posts in the civil services of the
State) Act, 2002
Act 10 of 2002
Keyword(s):
Government Servant, Reservation Order, Seniority
DISCLAIMER: This document is being furnished to you for your information by PRS
Legislative Research (PRS). The contents of this document have been obtained from sources
PRS believes to be reliable. These contents have not been independently verified, and PRS
makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy, completeness or correctness. In
some cases the Principal Act and/or Amendment Act may not be available. Principal Acts
may or may not include subsequent amendments. For authoritative text, please contact the
relevant state department concerned or refer to the latest government publication or the
gazette notification. Any person using this material should take their own professional and
legal advice before acting on any information contained in this document. PRS or any persons
connected with it do not accept any liability arising from the use of this document. PRS or any
persons connected with it shall not be in any way responsible for any loss, damage, or distress
to any person on account of any action taken or not taken on the basis of this document.
1
THE KARNATAKA DETERMINATION OF SENIORITY OF THE GOVERNMENT

SERVANTS PROMOTED ON THE BASIS OF RESERVATION (TO THE POSTS
IN THE CIVIL SERVICES OF THE STATE) ACT, 2002.
ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
Statement of Objects and Reasons:

Sections:
1. Short title and commencement

2. Definitions
3. Determination of seniority of the Government servants promoted on the
basis of Reservation.
4. Protection of consequential seniority already accorded from 27th April,
1978 onwards.
5. Power to make rules.
6. Power to remove difficulties.
7. Repeal and savings.
8. Schedule.
STATEMENT OF OBJECTS AND REASONS
The Government of Karnataka has introduced the policy of reservation in

promotion in favour of the Government Servants belonging to the Scheduled
Castes and the Scheduled Tribes as per the Government Order No. DPAR 29
SBC 77 dated 27-4-1978 (henceforth called, “Reservation Order”).
Paragraph 7 of the Reservation Order stipulates that the inter-se seniority

amongst persons promoted in accordance with that order on any occasion has to
be determined, in the manner provided in rule 4 or 4-A, as the case may be, of
the Karnataka Government Servants (Seniority) Rules, 1957.
The Supreme Court of India, in its Judgment dated 1-12-

2000, in the case of M.G. Badappanavar and Another Versus State of Karnataka
and others in Civil Appeal Nos. 6970-6971 of 2000 with Civil Appeal No. 6972 of
2000 (AIR 2001 SC 260) while dealing with the issue of determination of seniority
inter-se between the persons belonging to the reserved categories and the
general category, in pursuance of the ratio of the decision of the Constitution
Bench in Ajit Singh and Others (II) Vs State of Punjab and others-(1999) 7 SCC
2
209- has examined rule 2(c), rule 4 and rule 4-A of the Karnataka Government
Servants’ (Seniority) Rules, 1957 and has observed that there is no specific rule
therein permitting seniority to be counted in respect of a person promoted against
a (reserved) roster point.
While it is true that rules 2(c), 4 and 4A of the Karnataka Government

Servants (Seniority) Rules, 1957 do not cover promotions made on the basis of
roster, paragraph 7 of the Reservation Order introducing the policy of reservation
in promotion stipulates the manner of determining the inter-se seniority amongst
persons promoted on any occasion of promotion (on the basis of reservation).
This provision is independent of the said rules contained in the Karnataka
Government Servants (Seniority) Rules, 1957 as the Reservation Order is a self-
contained code regulating promotions on the basis of reservation.
Subsequently, the Parliament has enacted the Constitution (Eighty Fifth

Amendment) Act, 2001 with retrospective effect from 17-6-1995 providing for
consequential seniority in the case of promotion on the basis of reservation.
Therefore, it is considered necessary to remove any ambiguity and to

clarify that the Government Servants belonging to the Scheduled Castes and the
Scheduled Tribes promoted in accordance with the policy of reservation in
promotion contained in the Reservation Order shall be entitled to seniority as it is
available to the Government Servants belonging to the other categories.
Since the matter was urgent and the Karnataka Legislative Council was
not in session, the Karnataka Determination of Seniority of the Government
Servants Promoted on the basis of Reservation (to the posts in the civil services
of the State) Ordinance, 2002 (Karnataka Ordinance 2 of 2002) and The
Karnataka Determination of Seniority of the Government Servants Promoted on
the basis of Reservation (to the posts in the civil services of the State)
(Amendment) Ordinance, 2002. (Karnataka Ordinance 3 of 2002) were
promulgated to achieve the above object.
This Bill seeks to replace the said Ordinances.
Hence the Bill.
3
KARNATAKA ACT 10 of 2002

(First published in the Karnataka Gazette Extraordinary of the fourteenth day of
August 2002)

IN THE CIVIL SERVICES OF THE STATE) ACT, 2002.
(Received the Assent of the Governor on the twelfth day of August 2002)
An Act for Determination of Seniority of the Government Servants

Promoted on the Basis of Reservation to the Posts in the Civil Services of the
State:
Whereas the Government of Karnataka has introduced the policy of

reservation in promotion in favour of the Government Servants belonging to the
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes as per the Government Order No.
DPAR 29 SBC 77 dated 27.4.1978.
Whereas paragraph 7 of the Reservation Order stipulates that the inter-se

seniority amongst persons promoted in accordance with that order on any
occasion has to be determined, in the manner provided in rule 4 or 4-A, as the
case may be, of the Karnataka Government Servants (Seniority) Rules, 1957.
Whereas the Supreme Court of India, in its Judgment dated 1 -12-2000, in

the case of M.G. Badappanavar and Another Versus State of Karnataka and
others in Civil Appeal Nos. 6970-6971 of 2000 with Civil Appeal No. 6972 of 2000
(AIR 2001 SC 260) while dealing with the issue of determination of seniority inter-
se between the persons belonging to the reserved categories and the general
category, in pursuance of the ratio of the decision of the Constitution Bench in Ajit
Singh and Others (II) Vs State of Punjab and others-(1999) 7 SCC 209 has
examined rule 2(c), rule 4 and rule 4-A of the Karnataka Government Servants’
(Seniority) Rules, 1957 and has observed that there is no specific rule therein
permitting seniority to be counted in respect of a person promoted against a
(reserved) roster point.
Whereas while it is true that rules 2(c), 4 and 4A of the Karnataka

Government Servants (Seniority) Rules, 1957 do not specifically provide for
giving seniority in respect of promotions made on the basis of roster, paragraph 7
of the Reservation Order introducing the policy of reservation in promotion
stipulates the manner of determining the inter-se seniority amongst persons
promoted on any occasion of promotion (on the basis of reservation).
This provision is independent of the said rules contained in the Karnataka
Government Servants (Seniority) Rules, 1957 as the Reservation Order is a self-
contained code regulating promotions on the basis of reservation.
4
Whereas subsequently, the Parliament has enacted the Constitution

(Eighty Fifth Amendment) Act, 2001 with retrospective effect from 17-6-1995
providing for consequential seniority in the case of promotion on the basis of
reservation.
Therefore, it is considered necessary to remove any ambiguity and to

clarify that the Government Servants belonging to the Scheduled Castes and the
Scheduled Tribes promoted in accordance with the policy of reservation in
promotion contained in the Reservation Order shall be entitled to seniority as it is
available to the Government Servants belonging to the other categories.
Be it enacted by the Karnataka State Legislature in the fifty third year of

the Republic of India, as follows:-
1. Short title and commencement.- (1) This Act may be called the
Karnataka Determination of Seniority of the Government Servants Promoted on
the basis of Reservation (to the posts in the civil services of the State) Act, 2002.
(2) It shall be deemed to have come into force on the Seventeenth day of
June 1995.
2. Definitions. - In this Act unless the context otherwise requires,-
(a) “Government” means the Government of Karnataka.

(b) “Government Servant” means a person who is a member of the Civil
Services of the State of Karnataka or who holds a Civil post in connection with
the affairs of the State of Karnataka and includes any person whose services are
temporarily placed at the disposal of the Government of India, the Government of
another State, a local authority, any person or persons whether incorporated or
not.
(c) “Reservation Order” means the Government Order No. DPAR 29 SBC
77 dated 27 th April 1978 containing the policy of reservation in promotion, as
modified from time to time.
3. Determination of Seniority of the Government Servants Promoted

on the basis of Reservation.- Notwithstanding anything contained in any other
law for the time being in force, the Government Servants belonging to the
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes promoted in accordance with the
policy of reservation in promotion provided for in the Reservation Order shall be
entitled to consequential seniority. Seniority shall be determined on the basis of
the length of service in a cadre.
Provided that the seniority inter-se of the Government Servants belonging

to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes as well as those belonging to
the unreserved category, promoted to a cadre, at the same time by a common
5
order, shall be determined on the basis of their seniority inter-se, in the lower
cadre.
Provided further that where the posts in a cadre, according to the rules of
recruitment applicable to them are required to be filled by promotion from two or
more lower cadres,-
(i) The number of vacancies available in the promotional (higher) cadre for
each of the lower cadres according to the rules of recruitment applicable to it
shall be calculated; and
(ii) The roster shall be applied separately to the number of vacancies so

calculated in respect of each of those lower cadres;
Provided also that the serial numbers of the roster points specified in the
Reservation Order are intended only to facilitate calculation of the number of
vacancies reserved for promotion at a time and such roster points are not
intended to determine inter-se seniority of the Government Servants belonging to
the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes vis-a-vis the Government
Servants belonging to the unreserved category promoted at the same time and
such inter-se seniority shall be determined by their seniority inter-se in the cadre
from which they are promoted, as illustrated in the Schedule appended to this
Act.
4. Protection of consequential seniority already accorded from 27th

April, 1978, onwards.- Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act or any
other law for the time being in force, the consequential seniority already accorded
to the Government servants belonging to the Scheduled Castes and the
Scheduled Tribes who were promoted in accordance with the policy of
reservation in promotion provided for in the Reservation Order with effect from
the Twenty Seventh Day of April, Nineteen Hundred and Seventy Eight shall be
valid and shall be protected and shall not be disturbed.
5. Power to make rules.- (1) The State Government, if it deems

necessary, may by notification make rules to carry out the purposes of this Act.
(2) Every rule made under this Act shall be laid as soon as may be after it
is made before each House of the State Legislature, while it is in session for a
total period of thirty days, which may be comprised in one session or in two or
more successive sessions, and if before the expiry of the session, immediately
following the session or the successive sessions aforesaid, both Houses agree
in making any modification in the rule or both Houses agree that the rule should
not be made the rule shall thereafter have effect only in such modified form or be
of no effect, as the case may be, so however that any such modification or
annulment shall be without prejudice to the validity of anything previously done
under that rule.
6
6. Power to remove difficulties.- (1) If any difficulty arises in giving effect

to the provisions of this Act, the Government may by order published in the
official Gazette, make provisions not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act
as appear to it be necessary or expedient for removing the difficulty:
Provided that no such order shall be made after the expiry of a period of
two years from the date of commencement of this Act.
(2) Every order made under this section shall as soon as may be after it is
made, be laid before each House of the State Legislature.
7. Repeal and Savings.- (1) The Karnataka Determination of Seniority of

the Government Servants Promoted on the basis of Reservation (to the posts in
the civil services of the State) Ordinance (No.2), 2002 (Karnataka Ordinance 5 of
2002) is hereby repealed.
(2) Notwithstanding such repeal anything done or any action taken under
the said Ordinances shall be deemed to have been done or taken Under this Act.
SCHEDULE
(see the proviso to section 3)
If three vacancies of Assistant Commissioner are to be filled by promotion at the

same time, by a common order, classification of vacancies would be as follows :
1st ... Scheduled Caste
2nd ... Scheduled Tribe
3rd ... Unreserved
If the seniority of persons in the cadre of Tahsildars who are eligible and qualified
and whose cases are to be considered at that time is as indicated below,
A ... Scheduled Caste
B ... Unreserved
C ... Scheduled Tribe
D ... Unreserved
E ... Unreserved
then, on promotion, their inter-se seniority in the cadre of Assistant
Commissioners, will be as follows :
A ... Scheduled Caste
B ... Unreserved
C ... Scheduled Tribe
If on the other hand the seniority of the Tahsildars at that time is as indicated
below,
A ... Unreserved
B ... Unreserved
C ... Unreserved
D ... Scheduled Caste
E ... Scheduled Tribe
7
then their inter-se seniority, on promotion, in the cadre of Assistant

Commissioners will be as follows :
A ... Unreserved
D ... Scheduled Caste
E ... Scheduled Tribe
The above translation of dâ}ÖËrdâ (pÖmX{â ûÆÈÒ Éê©ÀêgâÔâ¶[Ìâ° Ýâ°{êMgâùgê) Æ°©ÉâÈÖ»
A|Öpâ{â Àê°©Èê ±ÚK Ýê³ª¬{â ÉâdÖËî }ñdâpâpâ uêX©ÍâFyêÌâ° ¾|ÖËpâÇê %º¾Ìâ°Àâ°, 2002 (2002 pâ dâ}ÖËrdâ
%º¾Ìâ°Àâ° ÉâªfêX 10) be published in the official Gazette under clause (3) of Article
348 of the constitution of India.
T.N. Chaturvedi
Governor of Karnataka
By Order and in the name of the Governor

of Karnataka
M.R. Hegde
Secretary to Government,
Department of Parliamentary Affairs and
Legislation.
8

IN THE CIVIL SERVICES OF THE STATE) ACT, 2002 has been amended by
the following Acts, namely:-
Amendments (chronological)
Sl.No. Act No. and year Sections amended Remarks
1. 10 of 2002 - -
Amendments (section-wise)
Sections Act No. and year Remarks
- - -

2002 Rules KR10

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

2002 Rules KR10

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

2002 Rules KR10

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Karnataka Determination of Seniority of the Government Servants

THE KARNATAKA DETERMINATION OF SENIORITY OF THE GOVERNMENT

Statement of Objects and Reasons:

1. Short title and commencement

STATEMENT OF OBJECTS AND REASONS

The Government of Karnataka has introduced the policy of reservation in

Paragraph 7 of the Reservation Order stipulates that the inter-se seniority

The Supreme Court of India, in its Judgment dated 1-12-

While it is true that rules 2(c), 4 and 4A of the Karnataka Government

Subsequently, the Parliament has enacted the Constitution (Eighty Fifth

Therefore, it is considered necessary to remove any ambiguity and to

KARNATAKA ACT 10 of 2002

THE KARNATAKA DETERMINATION OF SENIORITY OF THE GOVERNMENT

An Act for Determination of Seniority of the Government Servants

Whereas the Government of Karnataka has introduced the policy of

Whereas paragraph 7 of the Reservation Order stipulates that the inter-se

Whereas the Supreme Court of India, in its Judgment dated 1 -12-2000, in

Whereas while it is true that rules 2(c), 4 and 4A of the Karnataka

Whereas subsequently, the Parliament has enacted the Constitution

Therefore, it is considered necessary to remove any ambiguity and to

Be it enacted by the Karnataka State Legislature in the fifty third year of

2. Definitions. - In this Act unless the context otherwise requires,-

(a) “Government” means the Government of Karnataka.

3. Determination of Seniority of the Government Servants Promoted

Provided that the seniority inter-se of the Government Servants belonging

(ii) The roster shall be applied separately to the number of vacancies so

4. Protection of consequential seniority already accorded from 27th

5. Power to make rules.- (1) The State Government, if it deems

6. Power to remove difficulties.- (1) If any difficulty arises in giving effect

7. Repeal and Savings.- (1) The Karnataka Determination of Seniority of

If three vacancies of Assistant Commissioner are to be filled by promotion at the

then their inter-se seniority, on promotion, in the cadre of Assistant

By Order and in the name of the Governor

THE KARNATAKA DETERMINATION OF SENIORITY OF THE GOVERNMENT

Sl.No. Act No. and year Sections amended Remarks

Sections Act No. and year Remarks

You might also like