Babaian 2001
Babaian 2001
Babaian 2001
Original Articles
ABSTRACT
Purpose: It has recently been suggested that the diagnostic threshold for the prostate specific
antigen (PSA) assay be lowered to enhance prostate cancer detection. A 22% incidence of prostate
cancer has been reported in men with PSA between 2.5 and 4.0 ng./ml. We designed a study to
confirm this observation.
Materials and Methods: Men who participated in our free early detection program and who had
serum PSA between 2.5 and 4.0 ng./ml. were asked to undergo prostate biopsy. Of 268 eligible
men 151 (56%) agreed to participate in this free trial. All men underwent biopsy using an 11-core
multisite directed biopsy scheme. All biopsy cores were color coded for location specificity and
examined by 1 pathologist.
Results: Cancer was identified in 24.5% (37 of 151) of the men biopsied. The median age of men
with cancer was 62 years (range 43 to 74). Conventional systematic sextant biopsies, which
accounted for 6 of the 11 cores, detected 73.0% (27 of 37) of the cancers and the alternate site
biopsies identified the remaining 10. Gleason score was 6 in 25 men, 3 ⫹ 4 in 5, 4 ⫹ 3 in 4 and
8 or greater in 3 (median Gleason score 6). There were 14 men who had 1 core positive for cancer,
9 had 2 and 14 had more than 2 (median number of positive cores 2). Of the 14 men with 1
positive core 11 had a less than 3 mm. focus of cancer and 8 had only a positive alternate site
biopsy. There were 11 cases of abnormal results on digital rectal examination, 5 of which were
cancer, and 31 cases of abnormal results on ultrasonography, 13 of which were cancer. Median
biological variability in PSA was ⫾15% (range 0.4% to 440.0%).
Conclusions: We found a significant incidence of cancer (24.5%, 37 of 51) in men with serum
PSA between 2.5 and 4.0 ng./ml. In our study 67.6% of the detected cancers were significant
based on the biopsy data. If the PSA threshold is lowered the conventional systematic sextant
technique may be preferable to an extended strategy.
KEY WORDS: prostate-specific antigen, mass screening, incidence, biopsy
The prostate specific antigen (PSA) assay is widely used detecting cancer.5, 6 However, a lower threshold would signif-
throughout the world to detect prostate cancer. The estab- icantly increase the number of men who would become can-
lished absolute cutoff value commonly used to differentiate didates for biopsy.
the risk between cancer and no cancer is 4.0 ng./ml.1 The Approximately 12% of all men have PSA in the range of 2.5
limitations of this marker, specifically its false-negative and to 4.0 ng./ml., and presumably the vast majority do not have
false-positive rates, are well known. Numerous investigators this disease and even fewer would have clinically significant
have attempted to enhance the sensitivity and improve the prostate cancer.7 To our knowledge the relationship between
specificity of the PSA assay through various enhancements, curable prostate cancer and serum PSA has not yet been
including volume and age based indexes.2– 4 These modifica- clearly defined. About 30% of men with PSA 4.1 to 10 ng./ml.
tions have added little, if any, to our diagnostic armamen- have extraprostatic extension of cancer at prostatectomy,
tarium.4 Some investigators have suggested lowering the and this finding is associated with a less favorable outcome
diagnostic threshold to increase the sensitivity of PSA in compared with those with organ confined disease.8 Will low-
Accepted for publication September 15, 2000. ering the PSA threshold significantly improve outcome with-
* Financial interest and/or other relationship with Astra Zeneca out overtreatment of some patients compared to the outcome
and Bayer. achieved using the conventional PSA 4.0 ng./ml. threshold?
† Financial interest and/or other relationship with IMI, Inc., The task of investigators today is to enhance detection,
Tosoh, dia Dexus and Bayer.
thereby improving outcome, minimizing unnecessary biop-
Editor’s Note: This article is the first of 5 published in this sies and identifying those specific patients who would benefit
issue for which category 1 CME credits can be earned. In-
structions for obtaining credits are given with the questions from therapeutic intervention.
on pages 942 and 943. As a result of the challenge to lower the 4.0 ng./ml. PSA
757
758 SERUM PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN VALUE AND ITS RELATION TO BIOPSY STRATEGY
METHODS
and suspicious for cancer in 11 (7.3%) men, including 6 (5.5%) value to 2.5 ng./ml. will increase the disease specific survival
who had negative and 5 (13.5%) who had positive biopsy rate remains to be determined. However, it has been amply
results. Results of transrectal ultrasonography were abnor- demonstrated that treatment outcome for surgery and radi-
mal in 31 (20.5%) men, including 18 (15.8%) with negative ation therapy is associated with preoperative PSA, with pa-
and 13 (35.1%) with positive biopsy results. Of the 136 men tients with PSA less than 4 ng./ml. fairing better than those
evaluable for a family history of prostate cancer 23 (22%) with PSA 4.1 to 10 ng./ml.14, 15
with negative biopsy results had a family history of prostate Comparison of the conventional systematic sextant biopsy
cancer compared with 12 (34.3%) who had positive biopsy strategy and an 11-core multisite directed scheme revealed
results. This difference was not significant (p ⫽ 0.1863). A cancer detection rates of 17.9% and 24.5%, respectively. An
total of 20 patients reported taking saw palmetto, including 4 alternate biopsy site only was positive in 10 patients. Clini-
(10.8%) with cancer and 16 (14%) with a negative biopsy cally insignificant disease based on the previously stated
result. criteria was detected in 12 patients, 7 (58.3%) of whom had
A history of PSA testing was available for only 46 men only a positive alternate site. In addition, only 8% (2 of 25) of
because of inability to recall prior PSA values. Of the 39 men the significant cancers would have gone undetected if only
who could recall PSA history and who had negative biopsy the conventional systematic sextant biopsies were per-
results 36 consistently had values greater than or equal to formed. These data suggest that extended biopsy strategies
2.0 ng./ml. but less than 4.0 ng./ml., and 3 had levels consis- could be avoided in men with PSA between 2.5 and 4.0
tently less than or equal to 2.0 ng./ml. Of the 7 men with ng./ml. in an attempt to minimize the diagnosis of insignifi-
positive biopsy results 1 had PSA 4.8 ng./ml. and 6 had PSA cant cancers without jeopardizing the detection of significant
2.0 to 4.0 ng./ml. cancer.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
There are relatively few studies that document the inci- A significant number (24.5%) of men with serum PSA in
dence of prostate cancer when the PSA assay value is 2.5 to the range of 2.5 to 4.0 ng./ml. have prostate cancer and based
4.0 ng./ml. In 1996 Shroder et al reported a 14% incidence of on current clinical criteria the majority (70%) of these can-
PSA in the reflex range of 1 to 3.9 ng./ml., and 28% of these cers are clinically significant. Furthermore, if a decision is
men had cancer.12 In a larger study from Washington Uni- made to perform a biopsy when serum PSA is between 2.5
versity biopsy in 36% of men in a screening population with and 4.0 ng./ml., the conventional systematic sextant tech-
PSA 2.6 to 4.0 ng./ml. revealed cancer in 22%. As is readily nique may be preferable to an extended schema to decrease
apparent, these findings are similar to those found in men the detection of clinically insignificant cancers. A more de-
with PSA between 4.1 and 10 ng./ml.13 Our finding of a 24.5% finitive answer regarding the optimum biopsy strategy in
positive biopsy rate is in agreement with these previous these patients awaits larger multi-institutional studies.
reports.
The significance of our study is that approximately 56% of
all eligible patients underwent biopsy, reducing the effect of REFERENCES
bias on the result. There were no significant differences be- 1. Benson, M. C., Whang, I. S., Pantuck, A. et al: Prostate specific
tween men with negative and those with positive biopsy antigen density: a means of distinguishing benign prostatic
results in regard to abnormal findings on digital rectal ex- hypertrophy and prostate cancer. J Urol, 147: 815, 1992
amination, or in the proportions of those taking saw pal- 2. Babaian, R. J. and Camps, J. L.: The role of prostate-specific
metto. Furthermore, no man in our study had ever taken antigen as part of the diagnostic triad and as a guide when to
finasteride. As expected, a higher proportion of men with perform a biopsy. Cancer, 68: 2060, 1991
positive than those with negative biopsy results had a family 3. Oesterling, J. E., Jacobsen, S. J., Chute, C. G. et al: Serum
history of prostate cancer, although the difference was not prostate-specific antigen in a community-based population of
healthy men. Establishment of age-specific reference ranges.
statistically significant. The only preliminary conclusion that JAMA, 270: 860, 1993
can be drawn from the PSA history data is that men have a 4. Babaian, R. J., Kojima, M., Ramirez, E. I. et al: Comparative
poor recollection of prior PSA results and that most evaluable analysis of prostate specific antigen and its indexes in the
men did not have any prior values that were significantly detection of prostate cancer. J Urol, 156: 432, 1996
different from those at entry in this study. 5. Catalona, W. J., Smith, D. S. and Ornstein, D. K.: Prostate cancer
The only rationale to detect cancer early is to improve the detection in men with serum PSA concentrations of 2.6 to 4.0
survival rate and decrease disease related morbidity. Cata- ng/mL and benign prostate examination. Enhancement of spec-
lona et al reported that 83% of patients with PSA between 2.6 ificity with free PSA measurements. JAMA, 277: 1452, 1997
and 4.0 ng./ml. who underwent prostatectomy had significant 6. Schroder, F. H., van der Cruijsen-Koeter, I., de Koning, H. J. et
al: Prostate cancer detection at low prostate specific antigen.
disease defined as greater than 0.5 cm.3 tumor volume.5 On J Urol, 163: 806, 2000
the basis of an earlier study we showed that 32% of cancers 7. Kane, R. A., Littrup, P. J., Babaian, R. et al: Prostate-specific
with a tumor volume between 0.5 and 1.5 cm.3 had extra- antigen levels in 1695 men without evidence of prostate can-
prostatic extension, which has been reported to increase bio- cer. Findings of the American Cancer Society National Pros-
chemical failure rates.10 Whether lowering the PSA cutoff tate Cancer Detection Project. Cancer, 69: 1201, 1992
760 SERUM PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN VALUE AND ITS RELATION TO BIOPSY STRATEGY
8. Walsh, P. C., Partin, A. W. and Epstein, J. I.: Cancer control and 12. Shroder, F. H., Damhuis, R. A., Kirkels, W. J. et al: European
quality of life following anatomical radical retropubic prosta- randomized study of screening for prostate cancer—the Rot-
tectomy: results at 10 years. J Urol, 152: 1831, 1994 terdam pilot studies. Int J Cancer, 65: 145, 1996
9. Babaian, R. J., Toi, A., Kamoi, K. et al: A comparative analysis of 13. Catalona, W. J., Smith, D. S., Ratliff, T. L. et al: Measurement of
sextant and extended 11-core multisite directed biopsy strat- prostate-specific antigen in serum as a screening test for pros-
egy. J Urol, 163: 152, 2000 tate cancer. N Engl J Med, 324: 1156, 1991
10. Babaian, R. J., Troncoso, P., Steelhammer, L. C. et al: Tumor 14. Zagars, G. K. and Pollack, A.: Radiation therapy for T1 and T2
volume and prostate specific antigen: implications for early prostate cancer: prostate-specific antigen and disease out-
detection and defining a window of curability. J Urol, 154: come. Urology, 45: 476, 1995
1808, 1995 15. Partin, A. W., Pound, C. R., Clemens, J. Q. et al: Serum PSA
11. Terris, M. K., McNeal, J. E. and Stamey, T. A.: Detection of clini- after anatomic radical prostatectomy. The Johns Hopkins
cally significant prostate cancer by transrectal ultrasound- experience after 10 years. Urol Clin North Am, 20: 713,
guided systematic biopsies. J Urol, 148: 829, 1992 1993