Ordinary Agenda 19 March 2018
Ordinary Agenda 19 March 2018
Ordinary Agenda 19 March 2018
on
19 March 2018
5.30pm
at
Civic Centre
HORSHAM
Order of Business
9. COUNCILLORS’ REPORTS................................................................................................. 10
10. OFFICERS REPORTS ......................................................................................................... 11
10.1 ACTING CHIEF EXECUTIVE........................................................................................................... 11
10.2 DIRECTOR OF CORPORATE SERVICES ............................................................................................. 12
10.2.1 REVIEW OF DELEGATED POWERS .............................................................................. 12
10.2.2 REVIEW OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GRANTS AND COMMUNITY DONATIONS
POLICIES ..................................................................................................................... 17
10.3 DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC ...................................................................................... 19
10.3.1 REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF STREET NAMES – “BRADY” AND “GRIFFIN” ................ 19
10.3.2 EXEMPTION FOR FARM BUILDINGS FROM REQUIREMENT TO OBTAIN A BUILDING
PERMIT POLICY ........................................................................................................... 20
10.4 DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES ........................................................................................... 22
10.4.1 DRAFT WIMMERA REGIONAL LIBRARY CORPORATION BUDGET 2018/19 AND FIVE
YEAR INDICATIVE BUDGET ......................................................................................... 22
10.4.2 YMCA CONTRACT EXTENSION PROPOSAL .................................................................. 23
10.4.3 RURAL ACCESS PROGRAM.......................................................................................... 28
10.4.4 PUBLIC ART ADVISORY COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE ..................................... 28
CLOSE
GRAEME HARRISON
Acting Chief Executive
A Councillor who has a conflict of interest and is attending the Council meeting must
make a full disclosure of that interest.
(a) by either –
(i) advising the Council at the meeting of the details required under
paragraphs (b) and (c) immediately before the matter is considered at
the meeting; or
(ii) advising the Chief Executive Officer in writing of the details required
under paragraphs (b) and (c) before the meeting; and
(b) classifying the type of interest that has given rise to the conflict as either –
(d) if the Councillor advised the Chief Executive Officer of the details under
paragraph (a)(ii), the Councillor must make a disclosure of the class of
interest only to the meeting immediately before the matter is considered at
the meeting.
Members of Staff
Under Section 80C of the Local Government Act 1989, officers or people engaged
under contract to the Council providing a report or advice to Council must disclose
any conflicts of interests in the matter, including the type of interest.
7. OTHER BUSINESS
8. OTHER REPORTS
Farm Lease, Western Highway, Burnt Creek between Horsham Rural City Council and
Gavin Laurence O’Sullivan and Peter Eugene O’Sullivan
Farm Lease off Kenny Road, Horsham between Horsham Rural City Council and
Geoffrey and Christine Rethus.
Recommendation
That -
NIL
9. COUNCILLORS’ REPORTS
No Reports
Purpose
To update Council’s delegations to staff with changes arising from the Maddocks
Delegation Service.
Background
Powers to Council are granted through Part 1A of the Act which defines the charter
for Local Governments. This states the purpose of Local Government, its objectives,
role, functions and powers. Under Section 3F Council’s powers are defined and are
essentially very wide in nature. Section 3F (1) states “Subject to any limitations or
restrictions imposed by or under this Act, a Council has the power to do all things
necessary or convenient to be done in connection with the achievement of its
objectives and the performance of its functions”.
Because these powers are very wide Council cannot operate by means of passing a
resolution every time that it wishes to act. So for day to day operations Council
needs others to make decisions and act on its behalf.
Any delegation made under Section 98(1) to a member of staff or to the Chief
Executive (CE) must be made by a resolution of Council.
Under Section 98(2) & (3) of the Act, the CE is specifically given the power to
delegate to any member of the Council staff any power, duty or function of their
office other than the power of delegation.
Under Section 98(5) delegations may be made to individual persons or to the holder
of an office or position. Council has always taken the approach to delegate to the
position wherever possible rather than the individual staff member.
Section 98 (6) of the Act requires Council to review delegations within 12 months of
a general election. However, regardless of this statutory requirement delegations
should be made carefully and reviewed regularly to ensure:
• Decision-makers are clearly identified
• Accountability and responsibility is clearly identified
• Conditions, limitations and guidelines are well documented
• Precision in the making of decisions that will be defendable under legal scrutiny
Some Acts contain specific powers of delegation to persons other than the CE. In
these cases there is a presumption that a power of delegation cannot be sub-
delegated in the absence of express authority to do so, hence Council must delegate
these items direct to individual staff members.
Under the Building Act 1993, Municipal Building Surveyors (MBS) may also delegate
their powers to other officers. This is therefore not a delegation by Council but by
the MBS to staff and is signed-off by the MBS.
Council may also delegate powers to Special Committees established under Section
86 of the Act or Section 188 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987. Each
committee must have an Instrument of Delegation that clearly articulates the nature
of the delegation, and any conditions or limitations under which the delegation is to
be exercised.
A. Delegations of Council:
1. Council to CE
2. Council to Staff
3. Council to Special Committees
B. Delegation by Others:
4. CEO to staff*
5. Municipal Building Surveyor to Staff
Council has put in place detailed guidelines that help staff understand their
obligations and responsibilities when it comes to exercising a delegated power. Each
staff member receives a copy of their individual delegations and they are reminded
to read and understand the guidelines for the exercising these delegated powers.
Issues
A. DELEGATIONS OF COUNCIL
The delegation to the CEO was updated in Oct 17 and there were no further updates
at this point in time.
There is only one amendment that impacts on delegations from Council to Staff and
that is the changes to the Planning and Building Legislation Amendment (Housing
Affordability and Other Matters) Act 2017 which impacts on S173 (1A) of the
Planning & Environment Act 1987.
Details of all of the delegations from Council to Staff are shown in Appendix “10.2A”.
The delegation in relation to the determination of planning permit applications
Section 61 (1) of the Planning and Environment Act 1987, was identified as a
delegation requiring a review at a future point in time.
B. DELEGATIONS BY OTHERS
Under Section 98 (2) & (3) of the Act, the Chief Executive Officer is specifically given
the power to delegate to any member of the Council staff any power, duty or
function of their office other than the power of delegation. These delegations have
also been updated but do not need to be made by resolution of Council, so have not
been attached to this report.
There was a significant amendment of the Building Act 1993 that came in to force on
31 January 2018. This has resulted in the change that Councils can no longer appoint
authorised persons under the Building Act, this is now only possible by the Municipal
Building Surveyor (MBS). The MBS must ensure that the authorised person has the
appropriate qualifications or has successfully completed training.
Consultation/Communication
The attached delegations have been updated using the Maddocks Lawyers
delegation service and with consultation with relevant Council officers.
Financial
The financial impact of the review of delegations is limited to staff time and the cost
of the Maddocks Delegation Service which has been included in the 2017-18 budget.
Risks
The risk to Council of having inadequate instruments of delegation is that actions are
carried out without appropriate authority and therefore are subject to be challenged
in a court of law.
Also the fact that a delegation has been made does not affect the Council’s powers
in relation to the issue concerned. A delegate’s decision (once made) is taken to be
the decision of the Council itself. The Council can therefore find itself bound by a
decision which it may not itself have made. This risk is mitigated by having in place
appropriate policies and guidelines under which delegation should be exercised.
Guideline G04/004 has been put in place to address this issue and was recently
reviewed by the Executive Management Group.
Recommendation
In the exercise of the powers conferred by section 98(1) of the Local Government Act
1989 (the Act) and the other legislation referred to in the attached instrument of
delegation (Appendix “10.2A”).
2) The instrument comes into force immediately the common seal of Council is
affixed to the instrument.
3) On the coming into force of the instrument all previous delegations to members
of Council staff (other than the Chief Executive Officer) are revoked.
4) The duties and functions set out in the instrument must be performed, and the
powers set out in the instruments must be executed, in accordance with any
guidelines or policies of Council that it may from time to time adopt.
Purpose
Background
In March 2014, Council adopted two new policies that established clear protocols for
the allocation of Community Development Grants and Community Donations as part
of the annual budget process. These policies are reviewed each year as part of the
annual budget process.
Issues
This policy provides the framework for the delivery of Council’s Community
Development Grants Program. The policy outlines the:
• Funding priorities
• Eligibility
• Application process
• Assessment criteria and process
• Timelines and reporting
Minor changes have been made to this policy (refer Appendix “10.2B” – tracked
changes). These changes are as follows:
• Changes to funding priorities – to reflect new Council Plan and Health and
Wellbeing Plan
• Change in title for Planning and Economic Group
This policy provides the framework for Council’s annual Community Donations
program, that assist some groups with ongoing recurrent funding assistance. The
policy provides the rationale for community donations, eligibility, donation requests,
assessment criteria, donation approval and payment processes.
Minor changes have been made to this policy (refer Appendix “10.2C”) as follows:
Consultation/Communication
All key internal stakeholders have been consulted in the review of these Council
Policies including: Director of Corporate Services, Finance Manager, Manager
Recreation and Sustainability, Manager Information and Rating Services and the Risk
Management Co-ordinator.
Financial
There are no overall budget implications relating to proposed policy changes. The
two policies provide the framework for the allocation of community development
grants and donations as part of the annual budget process.
Community Development Grants Policy aligns with the Council Plan and Health and
Wellbeing Plan.
Recommendation
KERRIE BELL
Acting Director Corporate Services
Purpose
To request Council approval of two street names for new streets in the subdivision at
99 Robinson Street, Horsham.
Background
Mr Tim Hopper on behalf of Crest Pty Ltd has requested Council approval for the
names “Griffin Court” and “Brady Court” for the two new courts off Hamilton Street
in their subdivision at 99 Robin Street, Horsham.
Issues
Mrs Kerrie Bell, Manager Property and Rates has provided the following comments:
Griffin:
Norm Griffin has submitted the name Griffin in honour of his father, Charles Edward
Griffin. Charles worked in Horsham for many years as an Inspector for the State
Rivers and Water Supply Commission. He was also President of the Horsham
Homing Pigeon Club during the 1940’s and an active member of this club for many
years. Charles married Alice Elizabeth Overall from Quantong in 1932 and they
raised their five children in Horsham. Charles Edward Griffin died in 1954.
Brady:
Robert Henry Brady (deceased) was a returned soldier who served in the Middle East
and New Guinea. Robert and his wife, Joyce Emily Brady, established their property,
a soldier settlement block, at Drung Drung in 1947. Robert and Joyce raised five
children. They sold the farm and moved into Horsham where Robert was employed
for a period of time at Horsham City Council as a maintenance worker with the
technical services department.
Consultation/Communication
Financial
Recommendation
That Council approve the street names “Griffin Court” and “Brady Court” for the two
new streets off Hamilton Street in the subdivision at 99 Robinson Street, Horsham.
Purpose
To rescind the Exemption for Farm Buildings from requirement to obtain a building
permit policy.
Background
The exemption for farm buildings from requirement to obtain a building permit
policy was adopted by Council on 15 December 2003. This policy is now due for
review. A copy of the policy is attached as Appendix “10.3B”
Issues
The exemption for farm buildings from requirement to obtain a building permit
policy provides an exemption from certain farm buildings having to obtain a building
permit.
Since the implementation of this Policy over a decade ago, the National Construction
Code and Building Code of Australia has been amended, and now specifically covers
Farm Buildings and Sheds in their definitions.
Building Interim Regulation 2017 - R1804 states that Council may exempt a Class 10
building on a farmland used for farming to be exempt from obtaining a building
permit. This however is a conflict with the Building Code of Australia where farm
buildings and sheds by definition are now classed as Class 7 and Class 8 buildings.
They were previously considered to be Class 10. A description of the definitions is
included in Appendix “10.3C”. A class 10 building is now a private garage, carport or
shed.
As a result in the change of legislation, Council no longer has the power to grant this
exemption, and thus, the Policy is voided.
Consultation/Communication
Financial
Recommendation
That Council rescind the exemption for farm buildings from requirement to obtain a
building permit policy.
ANGELA MURPHY
Director Planning and Economic
Purpose
To inform Council of the proposed 2018/19 budget for the Wimmera Regional
Library Corporation including Horsham Rural City Council’s contribution to the library
service.
Background
The Wimmera Regional Library Corporation Board considered its draft budget for
2018/19 on 18 February 2018 and requested that the budget be referred to member
Councils for consideration in accordance with the Regional Library Agreement.
Issues
A copy of the draft budget is attached (see Appendix “10.4A”) and includes:
• Maintaining current opening hours and staffing levels at Horsham Library, and
the mobile service to Laharum and Natimuk;
• Collections budget, including e-resources of $304,986;
• Wi-Fi environment that enables patrons and visitors 24/7 internet access at
Horsham Library;
• Wage increases of 2.50% as per WRLC Agreement;
• Continuation of the Swift shared library consortia arrangements; and
• Continuation of State government library grant.
Consultation/Communication
The Wimmera Regional Library Corporation Board comprises six member Council
representatives who have participated in the draft budget discussions. Cr Koenig and
Kevin O’Brien (Director Community Services) represent Horsham Rural City Council
and are Wimmera Regional Library Corporation Board members.
Financial
Recommendation
That the proposed Wimmera Regional Library Corporation Budget for 2018/19 be
referred to Council’s budget process, and that the Library Board be advised
accordingly.
Purpose
Background
Council entered into a contract with the YMCA in July 2012 for management of the
Horsham Aquatic Centre for a three-year term, with two further options, each for an
additional three years. The first of these options was taken up by the YMCA, which
extended the original contract until 30 June 2018.
In December 2017, the YMCA submitted an initial contract extension proposal for
the second three-year option as per the conditions of the contract. Since then
discussions have taken place with the YMCA regarding the proposal, in particular
regarding the new contract cost and the proposal to introduce a 24/7 Gymnasium.
Negotiations have taken place with the YMCA, Acting CEO (Graeme Harrison) and
Director Community Services (Kevin O’Brien) after more detailed financial
information and proposed Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) were provided by the
YMCA. A detailed analysis was undertaken of the gross margins associated with each
of the service activities and the changes in key items of expenditure such as salaries
and YMCA overheads. From that analysis it was accepted that the figures reflected a
reasonable position going forward. Following these negotiations, we have reached
what officers consider to be an acceptable position.
To engage a management agency for the Horsham Aquatic Centre who will develop
an effective and accountable management relationship with Council to provide
sporting and recreational facilities of the highest standard that:
• Seek to cater for the needs of all sections of the local community and visitors as
far as practicable;
• Are utilised for fun and enjoyment, social connection, health and fitness,
education and training, relaxation and competition;
• Are innovative and creative in the range of leisure opportunities available to
users;
• Encourage and support residents, local organisations and groups to participate in
a range of recreational activities;
• Demonstrate sound business acumen, industry best practice and a focus on
quality services;
• Deliver on Council’s goals as included within the Council Plan;
• Recoup the operational cost of the facility while maintaining a high quality,
affordable service; and provide an environment that is functional and safe.
Discussion
If approved by Council the YMCA contract extension proposal increases the current
annual contract payment of $100,848 to the following:
The justification for the profit/loss share arrangement is that YMCA is taking the risk
of the 24/7 Gym model by making the capital investment; therefore, it is fair that the
YMCA should take any profit that occurs through this investment. The 100%
contractor profit/loss share arrangement reduces Council financial exposure.
Issues
On average, there have been 116 less members per month in the 2016/17 financial
year compared to the average number of members in the previous three years
(2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15 financial years). This has resulted in a loss of
income. A similar story with swimming memberships with an average reduction of
117 per month in 2016/17 financial year compared to the average of the previous
three years (2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15 financial years), which also resulted in a
significant loss of income in the 2016/17 financial year.
The YMCA sees the introduction of the 24/7 model as more of a membership
retention strategy rather than leading to increased memberships (which may also
occur). The YMCA argues that by introducing the 24/7 model it will meet the
broader needs of the community, which are changing constantly requiring more
flexibility in the way current services are delivered. The YMCA are willing to fund the
capital amount required to set up the 24/7 Gym.
Financial Analysis
A detailed analysis was carried out of the YMCA financial model for the final contract
extension period. Overheads are budgeted to increase by an average of 2.33% per
annum. There is expected to be a significant increase in Aquatic Education revenue
as a result of changes in the structure of the program and additional marketing. Also
casual aqua aerobics, recreational swim and group fitness attendances are expected
to increase
Consultation/Communication
• A number of meetings have been held with the YMCA in relation to the contract
extension proposal.
• The YMCA has carried out a specific survey in relation to the 24/7 gym model to
provide an opportunity for former members, casual members and the general
community to provide feedback on current service provision.
Financial
The 2017/18 & proposed 2018/19 Budget for the overall running of the Horsham
Aquatic Centre is as follows:
Item 2017/18 2018/19
(proposed)
Aquatic Centre Building Maintenance 54,000 56,000
Aquatic Centre Grounds Maintenance (Materials) 800 1,000
Aquatic Centre Grounds Maintenance (Plant Hire) 3,100 3100
Aquatic Centre Grounds Maintenance (Wages) 12,900 13,400
Aquatic Centre Major Plant Maintenance (Scheduled 47,000 47,000
and Reactive)
Contractors (YMCA) 100,848 250,000
Contractors Other 9,152 9,000
Electricity 163,000 183,000
Fire Services Levy 10,500 10,000
Gas Charges 71,500 81,500
General Rates 48,000 48,000
Insurance 13,000 13,000
Materials Purchased 700 700
Other Sundry Expenses (Miscellaneous when required) 10,000 10,000
Water Charges 35,000 42,600
Outdoor Pool Maintenance 4,000 4,000
The actual contract payment to the YMCA in the 2017/18 financial year is
$100,848.00. This has remained the same for the past three years. Any proposed
increases in Fees and Charges are subject to approval by Council as per contract
conditions.
There is a proposal to install Solar Panels at the Horsham Aquatic Centre. The timing
of this is unknown at this point as are the exact expected savings. Installation would
be dependent upon the receipt of a state government grant.
It also needs to be noted the YMCA’s commitment to reduce energy has been
highlighted in their proposal letter. As part of an ongoing commitment to the
sustainable operation the Horsham Aquatic Centre, the YMCA will also commit to
support council to explore energy related efficiency initiatives which can potentially
reduce the level of energy consumption at the facility.
The YMCA has proposed an increase in the contract payment as follows, 2017/18
arrangements have been included for comparison purposes:
It is to be noted that the proposed 2018/19 contract figure above does not include
the additional funding required to extend the outdoor pool’s hours on a trial basis in
the 2018/19 season as per the recent petition to Council, the amount being
$8,609.84. This would occur through a contract variation. This amount is included in
the overall budget as “contractors other” in the Financial section above.
Conclusion
The additional proposed cost to the YMCA Contract is due to changes in the market
because of new gym providers and competition in relation to swimming lessons.
The introduction of the 24/7 model invests in an innovative service model which will
better meets community needs with no Council contribution and the possibility of
generating additional memberships.
Recommendation
• Contract fees
2018/19 2019/20 2020/21
$250,000 $255,000 $260,100
Profit share – YMCA 100% Profit share – YMCA 100% Profit share – YMCA 100%
Loss share – YMCA 100% Loss share – YMCA 100% Loss share – YMCA 100%
Recommendation
That Council refer this item to the confidential briefing part of the meeting to
consider the report from the Director Community Services in accordance with
Section 89(2)(d) contractual matters and Section 89 (2) (a) personnel matters, of the
Local Government Act, 1989.
Purpose
As part of Council’s Committee review process, the Public Art Advisory Committee’s
(PAAC) has been reviewed to ensure principles of good governance and
transparency. This process has identified the following:
• Terms of Reference (ToR) are required (Appendix “10.4B”)
• Committee membership process needs to be revised. It is proposed that this be
an Expression of Interest (EOI) (Appendix “10.4C”)
Background
Horsham Rural City Council established the PAAC in 2015 to act as the principle
advisory body to Council on public art.
The PAAC led the development of the first draft of a Public Art Policy. This policy was
redeveloped into the Public Art Policy (adopted 2013) with the most recent version
reviewed and adopted in 2017.
Since its establishment, the PAAC has had a fluctuating membership. Up until now,
there has been no formal membership process and/or Terms of Reference.
Membership has generally comprised of Council Officers, Councillors, artists,
community art organisations and interested community members.
It is timely to call for Expression of Interests to the PAAC as there are a number of
vacancies as previous members have resigned and/or stepped aside.
Discussion
Terms of Reference
The proposed ToR is consistent with other Council Advisory Committees and is based
on current best practice.
Membership
Remaining current PAAC members will be encouraged to apply for PAAC
membership.
Expression of Interest
New representatives on the PAAC will be selected through a competitive application
process.
The PAAC EOI will be advertised in accordance with Council’s engagement principles,
and in local newspapers and on Council’s website between 21 March and 4 April
2018.
Applicants will be advised within the fortnight and invited to participate in the next
Public Art Advisory Committee Meeting.
If there are more suitable members than vacancies then the appointment decision
will be referred to the 16 April 2018 Council meeting.
New PAAC Representatives will be supplied with a Welcome Kit that includes:
• Welcome Letter
• ToR
• Public Art Policy
• Public Art Implementation Plan
Consultation/Communication
Previous PAAC members and Community Development and Technical Services staff
have been consulted on these proposed changes.
Financial
Recommendation
That Council adopt the Public Art Advisory Committee Terms of Reference as
attached as Appendix “10.4B”.
KEVIN O’BRIEN
Director Community Services
Purpose
1. To present an initial draft roads program for inclusion in the 2018-19 budget
estimates, and the basis on which the identified works have been prioritised.
2. To propose an engagement process about the road program.
Background
The roads program for the 2018-19 budget includes 23 categories, encompassing:
• Road construction
• Footpaths
• Drainage
• Re-seals and final seals
• Drainage
• Gravel re-sheets
• Bike paths
• Bridges
• Minor design consultancies and works
• Rural and urban areas.
The majority of these works are renewal works, i.e. where assets are re-constructed
to the original construction standard. In these cases, asset management principles
provide the basis for the program prioritisation, for example:
A small component of the program provides for upgrades of existing assets, for
example widening the seal of a road from 3.7 m to 6.2 m, or conversion from an un-
sealed to sealed road, or footpath upgrades. The priorities for these programs are
generally based on:
A small component of the program provides for some other sections of roads to be
upgraded. The ability to upgrade these roads is often linked to the availability of
external funding. For example, the latest section of Winfields Road is being upgraded
with a Local Roads to Market grant.
Discussion
Most of the program categories are funded at approximately consistent levels from
year-to-year, and condition assessments are used to establish the extent of the
program in each category. The broad aim with the program is to gradually reduce the
renewal gap of roads funding. In simple terms, the renewal gap is the difference
between the amount of depreciation in condition of our roads, and the amount that
Council is spending on maintaining / renewing them to an acceptable standard.
Condition assessments form the basis of our understanding of the condition of our
road assets. These reviews are undertaken each three years, with an assessment
being done of about 5,000 sections of gravel and sealed roads. The assessments
show how the road conditions are changing over time, and are used to identify the
sections of roads due for renewal, and to provide long-term projections of our need
to invest in roads to maintain them in a serviceable condition.
Prioritisation Process
There can be some discretion in which roads might be included, in the urban and
rural construction programs, at the margin of these programs. That is, some of the
roads can potentially wait a year for re-construction if there is some alternative
priority identified for some other non-renewal reason.
Funding
Funding for roads is drawn from rates, roads allocation from the Grants Commission
funding and other grants.
Two major sources of grant funding are Roads to Recovery and ad-hoc grants.
As advised at the 20 November 2017 Council meeting, Council has been receiving the
following funding from Roads to Recovery (R2R) in the past three years:
2017-18 $1,990,890
2016-17 $2,298,217
2015-16 $2,843,980
This coming year sees a reduced level of funding, with the reduction in R2R, and a
reduced potential for other grant funding.
Proposed Program
The attached spreadsheet Appendix “10.5A” presents a summary of the two key
programs where greater flexibility exists to influence priorities for the program.
These are the rural and urban construction programs. These programs are also the
most visible areas of the program.
For each of these programs, urban and rural, the program shows:
Consultation Program
In 2016-17 Council applied to the Essential Services Commission and was approved
permission to increase rates 1% above the rate cap. In its report on this approval, the
ESC indicated that for future proposals, Council would need to demonstrate a higher
degree of consultation and community acceptance of proposals, to support a rate
increase above the cap.
While a rate increase above the cap is not currently proposed, it is planned to
commence an approach on better engagement with the community on the roads
program.
Initially, this will commence with the urban and rural construction program, using
the following tools:
• Use of community map to highlight the proposed program and alternatives
considered
• Seeking comments via public notices and Facebook
• A media program to highlight this information and that feedback is being
sought.
Purpose
Background
The petition was presented to and discussed at Council’s 5 February 2018 meeting.
The resolution from that meeting was:
Issues
In January 2018 the original cause of the petition was addressed, i.e. a leak in the
wall that holds the pond’s water level had been leaking – this was repaired. However
residents also had concerns about:
A preliminary response to the petition had indicated that the water level would not
be able to be refilled after the leak was fixed. However, this position was changed, as
it was considered necessary to test that the leak was in fact fixed, by filling the pond.
As a result, the water in the wetland was at its normal level at the 2 March meeting.
Present at the meeting were Mayor Clarke, Cr Grimble this Director and about 20
residents of the estate.
• That there may be a second, smaller leak, which cannot be seen when the
water level in the drain beyond the wetland is high (as was the case at the
time of this latest meeting).
• Frogs do not seem to be in the wetland any more – they were in the past.
• Consideration should have been given to desilting the wetland when it was at
a low level in January
• It was observed that there appears to be blue-green algae in nearby Wotonga
Basin – that was confirmed by this Director, who had been advised of this
earlier in the afternoon of the meeting.
• Concern about fish (carp) stirring up silt in the wetland.
• There used to be 13 pelicans which frequented the wetland, but they no
longer land there.
• Drainage pipes from the local stormwater system appear to be flowing
poorly, potentially due to the build-up of silt within the wetland.
• Several aspects relating to the condition of the lawns and gardens
surrounding the wetlands
Subsequent to the meeting, a further email was received from one of the residents.
This focussed primarily on the apparent need for slushing / desilting of the wetland.
The measures outlined above will provide guidance in this regard.
Consultation/Communication
This report outlines the discussions with around 20 residents, and that further
communication will follow.
Financial
The cost of water sampling and investigations will be sourced from existing
maintenance and operation funds.
Council’s mission, from the Council Plan, includes the following relevant points:
Horsham Rural City Council, working with the community, will develop the
municipality through … responsive services and quality infrastructure, whilst
enhancing … our liveability and natural environment.
Maintenance and ongoing operation of the wetland is consistent with these aspects
of Council’s mission.
Purpose
Background
Since the last report details of the funding support package by the State Government
has been announced, and Council has had to provide an Expression of Interest to the
State Government in order to be considered for this funding.
Issues
The clarification and details on the funding support package is positive overall. The
funding will assist us in managing the cost increase until 30 June 2018.
Consultation/Communication
Financial
The potential remains for cost increases in Council’s waste service of around $30 -
$40 per service from 1 July 2018. The actual level of cost increase will depend on the
development of alternative medium-term arrangements, which is a current focus for
staff.
For the municipality to be a good place to live and preserve our natural
environments we need to: “Better manage our green and hard waste and
educate the community on recycling and energy efficiency.”
Conclusion
A further update will be provided at the Council meeting based on any developments
since the time of writing this report and Council will be updated on the progress of
the submitted application when we have something to report.
ROB MOIR
Acting Director Technical Services
APPENDICES
4. DISCUSSIONS – 5.30pm
Crs Power and Radford left the room due to Conflict of Interest at 6.25pm.
4.13 Parking
Discussed.
5. FOR INFORMATION
6. CLOSE
7.15pm
Instrument of Delegation
to
Instrument of Delegation
In exercise of the power conferred by section 98(1) of the Local Government Act 1989 and the other
legislation referred to in the attached Schedule, the Council:
1. delegates each duty and/or function and/or power described in column 1 of the Schedule
(and summarised in column 2 of the Schedule) to the member of Council staff holding,
acting in or performing the duties of the office or position described opposite each such duty
and/or function and/or power in column 3 of the Schedule;
2.2.1 comes into force immediately the common seal of Council is affixed to this
Instrument of Delegation;
2.2.3 is subject to any conditions and limitations set out in sub-paragraph 3.3, and the
Schedule; and
2.2.4 must be exercised in accordance with any guidelines or policies which Council
from time to time adopts; and
2.3 the delegate must not determine the issue, take the action or do the act or thing:
2.3.1 if the issue, action, act or thing is an issue, action or thing which Council has
previously designated as an issue, action, act or thing which must be the subject
of a Resolution of Council; or
2.3.2 if the determining of the issue, taking of the action or doing of the act or thing
would or would be likely to involve a decision which is inconsistent with a
(a) policy; or
(b) strategy
adopted by Council; or
2.3.3 if the determining of the issue, the taking of the action or the doing of the act or
thing cannot be the subject of a lawful delegation, whether on account of section
98(1)(a)-(f) (inclusive) of the Act or otherwise; or
2.3.4 the determining of the issue, the taking of the action or the doing of the act or thing
is already the subject of an exclusive delegation to another member of Council
staff.
…………………………………………… Councillor
SCHEDULE
INDEX
and suitable
complied with
safety supervisor
subsection (1)
belongs
section 39
other person and where the first person charged could successfully defend a prosecution without proceedings first where council is the registration authority
being instituted (contd)
r.19 or 20
s. 19
and power to notify applicant of the determination (including power to give notice under section 23 of the
Planning and Environment (contd)
N/D - 7/04/2014
s.184F(2) duty not to amend or end the agreement or give notice of the decision after an application is made to VCAT for
review of a failure to amend or end an agreement
N/D - 7/04/2014
s.184F(3) duty to inform the principal registrar if the responsible authority decides to amend or end an agreement after an
application is made for the review of its failure to end or amend the agreement
be managed
34E(2)(a)-(c)
section 34D(2)(a)
subsections (a)-(c)
adjacent areas
Council Policy
Community Development Grants
1. PURPOSE
Horsham Rural City Council (HRCC) Community Development Grants Program helps
groups in the Horsham & district community to improve community facilities and work
together for more engaged and healthy communities.
This policy provides the framework for the delivery of Council’s Community
Development Grants Program.
2. INTRODUCTION
The HRCC Community Development Grants Program is an annual funding program that
allocates grants to local not-for-profit organisations, groups and associations every year.
This policy outlines the funding priorities, eligibility, application requirements,
assessment criteria, grant approval and payment processes, timelines and reporting
process, and general information.
3. SCOPE
This policy is applicable to all community not-for-profit groups who operate in or provide
activities for the benefit of the residents of Horsham Rural City Council.
4. DEFINITIONS
N/A
5. PRINCIPLES
Warning – uncontrolled when printed – the current version of this document is kept on the HRCC website and intranet Printed 9/03/18
HRCC Policy – Community Development Grants Program Page 1
APPENDIX 10.2B
The Community Development Grants Program is linked to the key priorities of the
current Council Plan and Health and Wellbeing Plan. Accordingly, successful applications
should support one of the following key funding priorities:
A. Social connection
B. Physical activity
C. Healthy, safe and liveable environments
D. Education and economic development
E. Public health and safety
F. Healthy eating
G. Prevention of violence against women
H. Disability Access
• Community & cultural development Formatted: Font: Bold
Council may, for a particular year, add or change key funding priorities.
The maximum allocation per organisation is $10,000 although the majority of successful
applications range between $500 and $5,000. Council may consider a larger staged
project over a number of years for an application in excess of $10,000.
Projects which have a significant cash and/or in-kind contribution by the applicant
organisation are encouraged.
Total funds made available, for a particular financial year, will be a decision of Council
within the annual budget process.
Warning – uncontrolled when printed – the current version of this document is kept on the HRCC website and intranet Printed 9/03/18
HRCC Policy – Community Development Grants Program Page 2
APPENDIX 10.2B
5.2 Eligibility
All not-for-profit organisations, groups and associations based within Horsham Rural City
Council may apply for a community development grant.
The project must be delivered within the Horsham municipality and include direct
benefits for residents of the municipality.
Who cannot apply and what projects are ineligible for funding?
• Individuals
• Those seeking funding for a commercial business
• Those groups who have not expended or reported back on a previous grant
allocation
• Funding for organisational operating costs, e.g. wages and utilities
• Projects that are the responsibility of other sectors of government
• Projects that are a clear duplication of other services
• Projects that have already commenced
• Applications that are received after the closing date.
Projects are to commence after 1 July and be completed by 30 June of the following
year.
Eligible groups must apply by the due date and using the form supplied on the HRCC
Council website: Guidelines and templates for the Community Development Grants
http://www.hrcc.vic.gov.au/community-grants
Warning – uncontrolled when printed – the current version of this document is kept on the HRCC website and intranet Printed 9/03/18
HRCC Policy – Community Development Grants Program Page 3
APPENDIX 10.2B
• All applications are received by the Records Department and saved electronically.
• The Grants Officer prepares a Grants Summary which ranks applications in
accordance with the assessment criteria
• Initial assessment panel consisting of:
- Grants Officer
- Finance Manager
- One representative of Technical Services, Community Services and Economic
Development and PlanningPlanning and Economic
• The initial assessment panel makes recommendations to the Executive
Management Team.
• Sport & Recreation projects are referred to Council’s Sport & Recreation Advisory
Committee for prioritisation before final approvals are made.
• Executive Management Team endorse final grants list
• Final adoption by Council as part of the yearly budget process
Council may only allocate part funding for a project rather than the full amount
requested in the application.
A grant allocation by Council does not mean any ongoing funding commitment or
obligation by Council.
Applications seeking sponsorship for marketing and promotion of a local event outside
the municipality are referred to Council’s Tourism Events & Festival funding program
and guidelines.
Warning – uncontrolled when printed – the current version of this document is kept on the HRCC website and intranet Printed 9/03/18
HRCC Policy – Community Development Grants Program Page 4
APPENDIX 10.2B
Time lines are established by the Finance Manager in December each year to fit in with
the budget process for the following year. General guideline for timelines is as follows:
• Applications open End of January
• Applications close End of February
• Council Adoption End of April
• Advice to applicants End of April
In general, Grants will be paid in October of each year; however the payment date may
be varied in justifiable circumstances, upon written request to Council.
Payment of grants will be made upon receipt of invoices or evidence of project
payments by the organisation. These invoices and payments must coincide with the
grant financial year.
6. COMMUNICATION
The Community Development Grants program has a dedicated page on the Council
internet site http://www.hrcc.vic.gov.au/community-grants.
The Guidelines and Application forms are forwarded to all applicants from the previous
year.
The Community Development Grants Program is promoted during February each year in
local print media, coordinated by the Media and Communications Officer. Community
information sessions are coordinated by the Grants Officer in February each year
7. RESPONSIBILITY
Warning – uncontrolled when printed – the current version of this document is kept on the HRCC website and intranet Printed 9/03/18
HRCC Policy – Community Development Grants Program Page 5
APPENDIX 10.2B
8. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
Document Location
HRCC Community Grants Program – Funding Guidelines Internet
HRCC Community Grants Program – Application template Internet
HRCC Community Donations Policy Internet
9. DOCUMENT CONTROL
Warning – uncontrolled when printed – the current version of this document is kept on the HRCC website and intranet Printed 9/03/18
HRCC Policy – Community Development Grants Program Page 6
APPENDIX 10.2C
Council Policy
Community Donations
1. PURPOSE
Horsham Rural City Council (HRCC) provides annual assistance to a range of community
groups on a recurrent basis to support the activities of these groups within the
municipality. These community donations are included in the Council Budget adopted
each year.
This policy provides the framework for Council’s annual Community Donations program.
2. INTRODUCTION
In each annual budget process, HRCC allocates recurrent funding assistance to support
the activities of a range of community organisations that provide community facilities,
services, social support and recreational opportunities for the municipality.
This policy outlines the rationale for community donations, eligibility, donation requests,
assessment criteria, donation approval and payment processes.
3. SCOPE
This policy is applicable to community groups who operate in or provide activities for the
benefit of the residents of Horsham Rural City Council.
4. DEFINITIONS
Community Donation – for the purposes of this policy a Community Donation means
Horsham Rural City Council giving a cash payment or other council resources to assist
the recurrent operations of community groups.
Warning – uncontrolled when printed – the current version of this document is kept on the HRCC website and intranet Printed 9/03/18
HRCC Policy – Community Development Grants Program Page 1
APPENDIX 10.2C
5. PRINCIPLES
5.1 Eligibility
and/or Winter. For example: a reserve that is watered for both Summer and Winter Formatted: Underline
competition will receive two allocations. A reserve that is watered for either Formatted: Underline
Recreation reserves that receive direct support and maintenance via Council
recreation staff are not eligible for recurrent cash donations.
Council also provide a recurrent grant to support the operations of the Horsham
District Kindergarten Association.
Warning – uncontrolled when printed – the current version of this document is kept on the HRCC website and intranet Printed 9/03/18
HRCC Policy – Community Development Grants Program Page 2
APPENDIX 10.2C
E Sponsorship of prizes
Council sponsor a number of annual prizes to support the activities of schools and
local events.
The eligibility and amount of community donations is reviewed each year as part of
Council’s annual budget process. A full list of yearly community donations is included
in Council’s Annual Budget (available on Council’s website).
Note - groups receiving a community donation may also apply under the Community
Development Grants Program if they require cash support for a specific project.
The allocation of recurrent community donations are only made to community groups in
accordance with Section 5.1. If a community group believes that they fit under one of
the eligible categories for a community donation or if a current donation recipient
requests a variation they may lodge a request in writing to:
The request must provide details of their organisation, including current membership,
and details of community facilities and services provided including public access. The
Warning – uncontrolled when printed – the current version of this document is kept on the HRCC website and intranet Printed 9/03/18
HRCC Policy – Community Development Grants Program Page 3
APPENDIX 10.2C
request must state the reasons why the organisation is seeking on-going operational
support from Council.
The Chief Executive will make recommendation to Council who must approve any new
community donations as part of the annual budget process.
6. COMMUNICATION
7. RESPONSIBILITY
8. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
Document Location
HRCC Community Development Grants Policy Internet/Intranet
9. DOCUMENT CONTROL
Warning – uncontrolled when printed – the current version of this document is kept on the HRCC website and intranet Printed 9/03/18
HRCC Policy – Community Development Grants Program Page 5
GRASS PLAYING SURFACES MAINTENANCE
CPI 2% inc
Community maintained surfaces rounded to 00's
Watered Proposed
grass HRCC Current amount for
playing Who undertakes collects Grant grant
Facility Sport Snr Jnr Play train surface Committee the work User fees 2017/2018 2018/2019 Comments
Dooen Nil No Dooen Recreation Reserve (DELWP) Committee No $0 $0 No grass playing surfaces
Dock Lake ( Taylors lake) Football X X X X Yes Dock Lake Reserve committee (DELWP) Committee No $11,600 $11,800 2 sports ( all year use)
Cricket X ? X X Yes
Laharum Football X X X X Yes Laharum Sports Inc. ( HRCC) Committee No $11,600 $11,800 2 sports (all year use)
Cricket X X X X Yes
Kalkee Football x X X X Yes Kalkee Recreation Reserve (DELWP) Committee No $5,800 $5,900 1 sport ( partial year use)
Pimpinio Football X X X X Yes Pimpinio Recreation Reserve Committee No $5,800 $5,900 1 sport ( partial year use)
Quantong Football X X X X Yes Quantong Inc. (HRCC) Committee No $11,600 $11,800 2 sports (all year use)
Cricket X X Yes
Riverside ( Equestrian outdoor
surface) Horses X X X No Riverside Recreation Reserve Committee No $500 $500
Noradjuha Cricket X X No Noradjuha Recreation Reserve (DELWP) Committee No $5,800 $500 No watering of grass surface for cricket
Natimuk Showgrounds Football X X X X Natimuk Committee (AandP society) committee No $5,800 $5,900 1 sport ( partial year use)
Toolondo Nil Toolondo Recreation Reserve Committee No $500 $500 No current sport
Coughlin park Football X X X X Saints ( Parish) HRCC & committee No $11,600 $11,800 2 sports (all year use)
Cricket X X X X (HRCC retain funding to allocate internal staff)
school X X
Cricket X X
Dudley Cornell Park Football X X HRCC direct management HRCC Yes $0 $0
Cricket X X X
Soccer X X X
Little Athletics X X X
APPENDIX 10.2D
Haven School X X Haven Advisory Committee (HRCC) HRCC yes $0 $0 Council undertake all the work
Horsham College Football X X Horsham Community COM HRCC Yes $0 $0
Cricket X X X X
Hockey X X X
Umpires X X
Horsham Racecourse Advisory Committee (
Horsham Racecourse Reserve Adhoc Training X X HRCC) HRCC Yes $0 $0
Sunnyside Cricket X X X X Sunnyside Advisory Committee HRCC Yes $0 $0
school X X
POLICY FILE
NO: 5
_____________________________________________________________________
Council at its meeting on Monday 15th December, 2003 adopted the following policy:-
POLICY:
That Council, under Regulation 1.6(2) and 1.6(3) of the Building Regulations 1993 exempt farm
buildings on “farm land” from the requirement to obtain a Building Permit.
Farm buildings for the purposes of this policy are buildings which are 100% used for farming
purposes and is within the “Rural Zone” and the “Rural Living Zone’ of the Horsham Planning
Scheme
For the purposes of this policy, “farm land” is defined in the Valuation of Land Act 1960 as
follows:
“Farm Land” means any rateable land:
a. That is not less than 2 hectares in area; and
b. That is used primarily for grazing (including agistment), dairying, pig-farming, poultry-farming,
fish-farming, tree-farming, bee-keeping, viticulture, horticulture, fruit-growing or the growing
of crops of any kind or for any combination of those activities; and
c. That is used by a business –
i. That has a significant and substantial commercial purpose or character; and
ii. That seeks to make a profit on a continuous or repetitive basis from its activities on the
land; and
iii. That is making a profit from its activities on the land, or that has a reasonable prospect of
making a profit from its activities on the land if it continues to operate in the way that it
is operating.
The land must be classified as “farm land” for rating purposes by Council’s Valuer
It should be noted that if the land is not so classified, no exemption will be allowed unless the
Council Valuer determines it to be “farm land” on application, which must be made through the
Rate Collector.
• The owner is solely responsible to ensure that any exempt farm building meets with the
minimum structural standards applicable (including any applicable Australian Standards) for
the appropriate wind design speed and use of the building.
• The Horsham Planning Scheme requirements for that building and its required use,
especially with respect to setback distances and the type of wall/roof cladding.
APPENDIX 10.3C
APPENDIX 10.4A
WIMMERA MIBUS CENTRE, 28 McLachlan St HORSHAM VIC 34OO
Phone: (03) 5382 1777 Fax (03) 5382 0727
REGIONAL LIBRARY
Email: [email protected] Website: www.wrlc.org.au
ffi CORPORAT!ON ABN: 1 8 552 238 67 1
22 February 2OL8
Mr Graeme Harrison
Director Corporate Services Group r_,i-r'1, '',.
Horsham Rural City Council
PO Box 511 1 MAr 2018
HORSHAM 34OO
r.r'n r
Dear Mr Harrison, l1i:\J. ltj,
)
i
Re: Draft Library Budget 2018-2019 and 5 year indicative k-eltN ot/3At€i)
The Library Board considered the attached draft budget at the Board meeting on 16 February 2018
and resolved to accept it as tabled and asked that it be forward to member councils for consideration,
as per clause 8.1 of the Regional Library Agreement.
The proposed contribution required from your Council for 2018-19 is 5494,953, a slight increase on
the current year's contribution (S491,576). The draft budget has taken into account the withdrawal
of Buloke Shire Council as at 30 June 2018 and for the Corporation not to significantly increase
member contributions to meet the shortfall.
I am mindful of the enormous challenges facing our member councils, particularly the implications of
rate capping. With this in mind the Budget has been prepared in a most judicious manner. Please call
me if you wish to discuss any aspects of the budget. lf you wish to amend your council's contribution,
then I would ask that you notify me in writing before Friday 6 April so that an amended budget can be
prepared in time for the WRLC Board meeting to be held on Friday 20 April 2018.
Yours sincerely
J*J
Ann Twyford
Chief Executive Officer
APPENDIX 10.4A
APPENDIX 10.4A
APPENDIX 10.4A
APPENDIX 10.4A
APPENDIX 10.4A
APPENDIX 10.4A
APPENDIX 10.4A
APPENDIX 10.4A
APPENDIX 10.4A
APPENDIX 10.4A
APPENDIX 10.4A
APPENDIX 10.4B
Terms of Reference No: TR04/012
Terms of Reference
HORSHAM PUBLIC ART ADVISORY COMMITTEE
1. INTRODUCTION
Horsham Rural City Council has established the Horsham Public Art Advisory Committee
comprising representatives from Council, artists, community art organisations and the
community to support the delivery of public art in Horsham.
2. PRINCIPLES
Underlying Principles
The Horsham Public Art Advisory Committee will act as the principle advisory body to
Horsham Rural City Council on public art.
Operating Principles
The Horsham Public Art Advisory Committee will:
review proposals/concepts of public art
advise Council on public artwork to be commissioned, removed, relocated and de-
accessioned.
3. AIM
To advise Horsham Rural City Council on strategic policy issues and support the delivery
of public art with the current priorities of both the community and Council.
4. OBJECTIVES
Review proposal and concepts of public art
Advise Council on the commissioning of public art works
Advise council on the removal, relocation and de-accessioning of public art
Advise Council on public art needs and trends
Encourage and increase the community’s understanding of the role public art plays
Provide expert input into the development of Council’s Public Art program
Warning – uncontrolled when printed – the current version of this document is kept on the HRCC website and intranet Edited: 14/03/18
HRCC Terms of Reference – Horsham Public Art Advisory Committee Page 1
APPENDIX 10.4B
Terms of Reference No: TR04/012
5. OPERATIONS
The Horsham Public Art Advisory Committee will be a community based advisory
committee appointed by Council. The Committee does not have the power to commit
Council to any decision or action, or to direct council staff in their duties. The Committee
may make recommendations for consideration by Council, but Council reserves the right
to accept or reject recommendations from the Committee.
Membership
Committee membership shall consist of a maximum of eight people, being single
representatives unless identified otherwise, from the following groups:
Ex Officio attendees
Cultural Development Officer
Community Development Manager
Director Technical Services (or delegate)
Selection
Representatives of the Committee will be selected through an application process,
advertised in accordance with Council’s engagement principles, and in local newspapers
and on Council’s website.
If the number of applications does not exceed the number of vacancies, the Council’s
Delegated Officer (Director Corporate Services) will approve nominations. In the event of
more than the required number of applicants for the available positions, nominations will
be forwarded to Council for determination.
Alternative Representatives
As required, an alternative representative may attend meetings on behalf of the named
user groups/members. Alternative representatives are entitled to vote if the named
representative is not present at the meeting.
Warning – uncontrolled when printed – the current version of this document is kept on the HRCC website and intranet Edited: 14/03/18
HRCC Terms of Reference – Horsham Public Art Advisory Committee Page 2
APPENDIX 10.4B
Terms of Reference No: TR04/012
Specialist advice
Individuals and groups may be invited to attend Committee meetings to provide specialist
advice. They must not be involved in the decision making process and cannot vote on any
issue.
Council Officers
Council Officers, Cultural Development Officer, Community Development Manager and
Director Technical Services (or delegates) will attend all meetings. Council Officers are not
members of the Advisory Committee and are not eligible to vote.
Term of Office
Membership shall generally be for a term of two years. Members may apply for re-
nomination to the Committee for a second term. Maximum membership will be two
terms.
Resignations
Committee members who resign prior to the end of their appointment should submit their
resignation in writing to the Chairperson.
If a vacancy occurs within two months of the end of the term of the Committee, the
vacancy will not be filled. In all other instances, the vacancy will be filled to reflect the
composition of the Committee as identified in Section 3.
Meeting procedure
At the beginning of each calendar year, the Committee will agree on a regular schedule of
meetings.
Meetings will generally be held six times each year.
Additional special meetings may be called as required. Committee members must be
provided with seven days’ written notice of a special or additional meeting and the
purpose of the meeting must be clearly stated.
Electronic Meetings
Meetings of the Committee may be held through the use of a conference telephone or
similar communications equipment provided that all members participating in the
meeting can communicate with each other. Participation in a meeting in this way
constitutes attendance at the meeting.
Attendance at meetings
It is expected that members will attend all meetings. In the event of a Committee member
missing a meeting they should contact the Chairperson with notice of their absence and
this will be recorded in the minutes.
Warning – uncontrolled when printed – the current version of this document is kept on the HRCC website and intranet Edited: 14/03/18
HRCC Terms of Reference – Horsham Public Art Advisory Committee Page 3
APPENDIX 10.4B
Terms of Reference No: TR04/012
If a member of the Committee misses three consecutive meetings without explanation the
Chairperson or nominee, will contact the member to determine if they wish to continue
their participation on the Committee.
If a member resigns from the Committee, their position will be filled by a representative
from the same sector or group.
Council will:
Document minutes of each scheduled meeting and distribute
Ensure Council officers or delegates are present at all Committee meetings, wherever
possible
Report details of public art commissions, removal, relocation and de-accessioning to
the Committee
Notify the Committee of approved Committee membership
Provide regular reports to Council regarding Committee recommendations
Provide timely feedback (and if applicable timelines) of Council’s consideration of
recommendations approved by Committee
Respond to requests/letters from the Committee as per Council’s Customer Services
Charter
Every four years or earlier if required, review the function and purpose of the
Committee and determine if the Committee should continue
Warning – uncontrolled when printed – the current version of this document is kept on the HRCC website and intranet Edited: 14/03/18
HRCC Terms of Reference – Horsham Public Art Advisory Committee Page 4
APPENDIX 10.4B
Terms of Reference No: TR04/012
Confirm the accuracy of minutes at the next meeting of the Committee. The
Chairperson must sign a copy of the confirmed minutes
Actively participate in activities that support the achievement of the purpose and
responsibilities of the Committee.
Councillor report
The Responsible Councillor may choose to give a verbal report of the key issues at this
meeting.
Confidentiality
Information discussed, received, used or created by the Committee may be
confidential. A Committee member must not disclose, discuss or otherwise make
public confidential information, unless authorised by the Officer supporting the
Committee.
Council may terminate a Committee member’s appointment if they have been found
to breach confidentiality requirements.
Conflicts of Interest
In accord with the requirements of the Local Government Act, 1989 members must
comply with these provisions including declaration of conflicts of interest.
Reporting
The Advisory Committee shall:
provide to Council a copy of its meeting minutes.
provide reports to Council on its recommendations as required
Media
The Chairperson is authorised to speak to the media with the approval of the Manager
Community Development.
In the absence of the Chairperson, the Manager Community Development or approved
delegate is empowered to be spokesperson for the Committee.
Media releases, flyers, brochures, pamphlets or other sources of information
distributed by the Committee must be first approved by the Manager Community
Development, or nominee.
Chairperson
All members of the Horsham Public Art Advisory Committee are eligible to be elected
to the position of Chairperson.
Warning – uncontrolled when printed – the current version of this document is kept on the HRCC website and intranet Edited: 14/03/18
HRCC Terms of Reference – Horsham Public Art Advisory Committee Page 5
APPENDIX 10.4B
Terms of Reference No: TR04/012
Review
The composition, activities and Terms of Reference of the Committee will be
reviewed at least every four years, or as required. The results of any review shall be
reported to Council prior to the fourth year of operation or earlier, if a quorum is
unable to be formed for three successive meetings.
Cessation
An Advisory Committee ceases to exist at the conclusion of the period specified in
the Terms of Reference, unless Council resolves that it continue.
Council may also disband a Committee at any time, following a review of its
operation or if Council Policy or strategic direction alters significantly.
7. RESPONSIBILITY
8. DOCUMENT CONTROL
Warning – uncontrolled when printed – the current version of this document is kept on the HRCC website and intranet Edited: 14/03/18
HRCC Terms of Reference – Horsham Public Art Advisory Committee Page 6
APPENDIX 10.4C
APPLICATION
PUBLIC ART ADVISORY COMMITTEE
I, ...............................................................................................................................................
(Given Names) (Surname)
of ...............................................................................................................................................
(Address)
Phone No ...................................................................................................................................
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Process: Application close 4th April, 2018. Applications will be assessed by Council Officers and will be
advised by the 11th April, 2018 0or 17 April 2018 if a council decision is required regarding membership.
Acceptance on the Committee is the prerogative of Council whose decisions are final. Privacy of all applicants
will be maintained.
Acceptance Statement: If accepted as a member of the Committee, I agree to disclose any conflicts of
interest, maintain confidentiality within my participation and abide by the Terms of Reference of the
committee and undertake my duties and responsibilities to the best of my ability.
Please return the completed application form to xxx, Executive Assistant by [Insert date]:
Email: [email protected]
Post: PO Box 511, Horsham, VIC, 3402
Address correspondence to: Chief Executive Officer, PO Box 511, Horsham Victoria 3402
Civic Centre 18 Roberts Avenue, Horsham Victoria 3400
Ph 03 5382 9777 Fax 03 5382 1111 Email [email protected] Website www.hrcc.vic.gov.au
APPENDIX 10.5A
Estimd. Condition
Description From - to Comments
Costs Rating
ASPLINS ROAD Wimmera Hwy to Jahn Ave $ 233,000 Widen to 6.2m seal width. 5
Seal change to seal change (Narrow Widen it to 6.2m wide seal. Do crest and
WAIL KALKEE ROAD
seal section)
$ 282,000
intersection.
Not Funded
ASPLINS ROAD Jahn Ave to Lanes Ave $ 240,000 Widen to 6.2m seal width. Not Funded
LANES AVENUE Asplins Rd to Chequers Rd $ 70,000 Widen to 6.2m seal width. Not Funded
CHEQUERS ROAD Lanes Ave to Seal Change $ 20,000 Widen to 6.2m seal width. Not Funded